Mobile learning about mobile learning Michael M. Grant, PhDhttp://viral-notebook.com
Michael M. Grant 2010
Image from http://www.flickr.com/photos/joshrussell/2907842784/
Michael M.
Grant
Tweeting?
@michaelmgrant
Please use #WTTS .
http://bit.ly/westtntech
Download the slides from here.
Background
What is mobile learning?
“The intersection of mobile computing and e-learning: accessible resources wherever you are, strong search capabilities, rich interaction, powerful support for effective learning, and performance-based assessment. eLearning independent of location in time or space.”
(Quinn, 2000, para. 5)
What is mobile learning?
The “exploitation of ubiquitous handheld hardware, wireless networking and mobile telephony to enhance and extend the reach of teaching and learning.”
(Mobile Learning Network [MoLeNet], 2009)
What is mobile learning?
“Any form of learning that happens when mediated through a mobile device.”
(Herrington et al., 2009)
What is mobile learning?
Mobile learning is more than just learning delivered and supported by handheld and mobile technologies. It is learning that is both formal and informal, context aware, and authentic for the learner.
(Traxler, 2005, 2007, 2010)
vs.
http://bit.ly/cOSsBi
(So, 2010)
Distance Learning
eLearning
mLearning
(So, 2010)
Distance Learning
eLearning
mLearning
A pilot invitation
What I did …
Graduate Course: “School Change & the Internet”
Completely online course
Local students could check out an iPod Touch
One unit of nine
Inservice teachers & LMS certifications
Ages: 24–51 (mean=36.4)All women
Survey adapted from (Motiwalla, 2007) and (Grant & Cheon, 2007)
Discussion posts about the experience
Demo
The mobile app/unit
How did it go?
Survey Items (n=15) Mean Std. Deviation
The MOBL 21 application was easy to use. 4.27 .799
The MOBL 21 application was easy to understand. 4.40 .737
The mobile learning unit was an effective learning strategy for me. 4.13 .915
The mobile learning unit allowed me to convert any wait (dead) time into productive time. 4.27 .884
The mobile learning unit allowed convenient access to course materials. 4.27 1.223
The mobile learning unit should be used as a supplemental tool for any existing course. 3.60 1.121
The mobile learning unit could replace an online course unit. 2.53 .990
Lickert scale of 1:Strongly Disagree to 5:Strongly Agree
Survey Items (n=15) MeanStd.
Deviation
The text in the mobile learning unit was acceptable quality. 3.87 .915
The media (e.g., images, videos) in the mobile learning unit were acceptable quality. 3.20 .941
I am willing to use a mobile device for learning. 3.80 1.320
The mobile learning unit was an effective method to receive course content. 4.27 .799
The mobile learning unit stimulated my thinking. 4.00 .845
The mobile learning unit content was of high quality. 4.20 .676
The MOBL 21 application was easy to download and install. 4.40 .828
I accessed the content in this mobile learning unit more often than I did the other units on our course website.
2.87 1.407
Lickert scale of 1:Strongly Disagree to 5:Strongly Agree
I liked it better than I thought I would. I was able to walk around with it and read more easily than with a book. But, I had to keep touching the screen to keep it lit because I was taking notes while I was reading.
Also, the font was small which was o.k., but I was wondering how someone with trouble seeing would adjust because the size couldn't figure out how or if the size could be adjusted like it can be on some other apps. I also, like the idea of it from a conservation stand point- less paper and waste.
“
”
The text was small and could not be made larger by turning the device or tapping (which enlarges the image in some apps), but I could still read it ok.
“
”
I really like the concept of this application. My husband has an i-Touch, so I was able to download the app. easily. However, we do not have Wi-Fi access on it, so I had to drive down the road a little to download the cards. After that I was able to take it to the ballgame and study.
“
”
I was not able to gain access to an Ipod …. My experience with the desktop application was great. I had no problems downloading the applications or with maneuvering through the material. I liked the idea that I could quickly move from section to section without a lot of lag time waiting for it to load.
“
”
Unexpectations
Hey! Where’d my image go?
Moving forward … Oh, it’s a five-
month-old
Conversations with MOBL 21
adding Android and iPad versions
A mobile CMS — mCMS?
Things to come
Image from http://www.flickr.com/photos/zetson/3758193625/
Questions?
Twitter@michaelmgrant
Emailmgrant2 [at]
memphis [dot] edu
References & Acknowledgements Grant, M. M., & Cheon, J.-p. (2007). The value of using synchronous conferencing
for instruction and students. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3). Available at http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/viewarticle.cfm?volID=6&IssueID=21&Ar ticleID=109.
Herrington, J., Herrington, A., Mantei, J., Olney, I. & Ferry, B. (2009). Using mobile technologies to develop new ways of teaching and learning, in J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney, & B. Ferry (eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, Australia.
Mobile Learning Network (MoLeNET ). (2009). What is mobile learning? Retrieved December 30, 2009, from http://www.molenet.org.uk/
Motiwalla, L.F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education, 49, 581-596.
Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning. Mobile, Wireless, In-Your-Pocket Learning. Linezine. Fall 2000. Available at http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
So, S. (2010, October 27). Pedagogical and technological considerations of mobile learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, CA.
Michael M. Grant 2010