8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
1/20
Francesco Molinari & Erika PorquierKrems, 6th May 2010
Social Networking on ClimateChange: The IDEAL-EU Experience
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
2/20
Abstract Our paper reports about the deployment of a multilingual SocialNetworking Platform in three Regions of Europe (Catalonia,Poitou-Charentes and Tuscany), in the context of a EU-fundedPreparatory Action on eParticipation (IDEAL-EU), dealing withthe issue of climate change and energy policy making at the levelof the European Parliament.
The US (Obama) approach and a novel European usage of social networks in political online discourses are compared.
A recommendation to policy makers is that social networking can be useful whenever the topics under discussion are limited inscope, but also wide in implications, so that they require movingforward from one-shot and ad-hoc participation experiments,towards the permanent coverage of mission critical PublicAdministration functions.
Krems, 6th May 20102
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
3/20
Overarching research questions
1. Are computer-based social networks a valid extension of those based on face-to-face interaction?
2. Can the former be of use for politicians and policy makers?3. Are there any structural differences between the US and
the EU approach (if any) to social networking in politics?
Not a systematic collection of evidence, but some hints from existing theories and practice
Krems, 6th May 20103
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
4/20
Evidence
Research Question #1
Krems, 6th May 20104
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
5/20
Contradictory trends?Global Web Traffic to SocialNetworking Sites
Unique Visitors Growth Vs.Penetration
Krems, 6th May 20105
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
6/20
Social implications of Dunbars number
Krems, 6th May 20106
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
7/20
Maximum network size averaged 153.5 individuals ,
with a mean network size of 124.9 for those individuals explicitly contacted;these values are remarkably close to the group size of 150 predicted for humanson the basis of the size of their neocortex. Age, household type, and therelationship to the individual influence network structure, although the
proportion of kin remained relatively constant at around 21%. Frequency of contact between network members was primarily determined by two classes of variable: passive factors (distance, work colleague, overseas) and active factors(emotional closeness, genetic relatedness). Controlling for the influence of passive
factors on contact rates allowed the hierarchical structure of human social
groups to be delimited. These findings suggest thatthere may becognitive constraints on network size .
Krems, 6th May 20107
Source: Hill and Dunbar (2003)
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
8/20
Evidence
Research Question #2
Krems, 6th May 20108
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
9/20
Five impact areas of social networks inUS politics
Krems, 6th May 20109
Branding Voter registration Fund raising Volunteering Voter Turnout
Source: Chris Kelly (2007)
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
10/20
Can we say they work? Yes, we can!
Krems, 6th May 201010
This graph taken from Marcelo et al. (2008)
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
11/20
Evidence
Research Question #3
Krems, 6th May 201011
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
12/20
A European Way to Social Networking?
Krems, 6th May 201012
The IDEAL-EU SNPhttp://www.ideal-debate.eu
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
13/20
The IDEAL-EU SNP Figures
July-December 2008 January-December 2009
Krems, 6th May 201013
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
14/20
The IDEAL-EU SNP Traffic
Krems, 6th May 201014
Google Stats
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
15/20
Five characters of successful socialnetworks in EU/US politics
Krems, 6th May 201015
a) Specialist / rather than generalist like in the US (e.g.electoral Facebook groups)
b) Top down (by Government initiative) / rather than
bottom up (Party campaign)c) Dealing with policy issues / rather than electoral aimsd) The presence of lively debates increases reputation and
attractiveness, thus Google driven traffic (only EU)e) They can induce mass imitation and multiplicative effects
(both but at different action levels presumably)
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
16/20
Vote Rush Vs. Bar Chat
The US Way The EU Way
Krems, 6th May 201016
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
17/20
Recommendation for EU PA
Krems, 6th May 201017
Build an ICT infrastructure (better if OpenSource) for social networking whenever thetopics under discussion arelimited in scope, but wide
in potential implications. This can justify moving forward from one-shotand ad-hoc participation experiments, towardspermanent coverage of Public Administrations
mission critical functions.
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
18/20
Disclaimer
Krems, 6th May 201018
The underlying research was made possible in part by a co-financement of the European Commission to the IDEAL-EUProject, a Preparatory Action in the area of eParticipation.However, the opinions expressed in this paper are solely of
the authors and do not involve any of the EU institutions.
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
19/20
References
Krems, 6th May 201019
R.A. Hill and R.I.M. Dunbar (2003): Social Network Size inHumans. In Human Nature, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 5372.
K.B. Marcelo, M.H. Lopez, C. Kennedy and K. Barr (2008):Young Voter Registration and Turnout Trends. CIRCLE/Rock theVote, online: http://www.civicyouth.org
Morgan Stanley Research (2009): Economy + Internet Trends.March 20, 2009, online: http://www.slideshare.net/tcrock08/techtrends032009final
Nielsenwire (2010): Led by Facebook, Twitter, Global Time Spenton Social Media Sites up 82% Year over Year. http://
blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/led-by-facebook-twitter-global-time-spent-on-social-media-sites-up-82-year-over-year/
8/8/2019 Molinari @ EDEM10
20/20
Contacts Corresponding author:Francesco Molinari, [email protected]
Erika Porquier, [email protected]
Krems, 6th May 201020