MÁSTER EN FORMACIÓN DEL PROFESORADO DE EDUCACIÓN SECUNDARIA OBLIGATORIA, BACHILLERATO, FORMACIÓN PROFESIONAL
Y ENSEÑANZAS DE IDIOMAS
“Curricular adaptations in the ESL classroom: students with special
educational needs.”
TRABAJO FIN DE MÁSTER. CURSO: 2012 - 2013 ESPECIALIDAD: Lengua Extranjera – Inglés APELLIDOS Y NOMBRE: Ramírez Montero, Susana DNI: 47544829-B CONVOCATORIA: SEPTIEMBRE TUTOR/A: Dra. Asunción López-Varela Azcárate. Departamento de Filología Inglesa II. Facultad de Filología A.
_______________________________________________________________________
1
ABSTRACT
During the last decades in Spain, the field of orientation has considerably evolved in our
educational system. It is not only a right for all students, but also a symbol of educational
quality. Precisely, the current tendency claims for the so-called “mainstream principle” or
school integration of students with special educational needs (i.e., those whose physical,
intellectual or social capacities are below or above the population average) in the ordinary
classroom, instead of segregating them in special education centres or in other kind of
institutions. Hence, curricular adaptations appear as a solution and as an alternative to
help students with special needs to develop their potential in the most successful way
possible.
Curricular adaptations can be carried out in all subjects, but the main aim of this paper is
to analyse how they are dealt with in the ESL classroom at a high school level and how
students’ performance in L2 benefits from these measures. In order to do that, a detailed
explanation about what the term “special educational needs” refers to and what curricular
adaptations consist of (both in theoretical and practical terms) will be given, followed by a
description of several particular cases (mainly, cases of mental retardation in students
from 2nd year) in which different contents and materials have been used with this kind of
students to accomplish our aim in the ESL classroom. Then, these activities and their
degree of success in our students’ performance in L2 will be analysed according to
Howard Gardner’s theory of multiple intelligences. Finally, a comparison between the
adapted materials and the ordinary ones will be done so that we can check to what extent
curricular adaptations are positive for these students to acquire knowledge in L2 and how
they gradually improve and evolve.
Key words: orientation, educational system, mainstream principle / school integration,
Special Education, curricular adaptations, students with special educational needs,
ordinary classroom, ESL classroom, performance in L2, mental retardation, types of
activities, multiple intelligences, adapted materials.
RESUMEN
Durante las últimas décadas en España, el campo de la orientación educativa ha
evolucionado de forma considerable. No sólo es un derecho de todo estudiante, sino un
símbolo de calidad. Precisamente, la tendencia actual aboga por el llamado “principio de
normalización” o integración escolar de los alumnos con necesidades educativas
especiales (es decir, aquellos cuyas capacidades físicas, intelectuales y sociales se
2
encuentran por debajo o por encima de la media de la población) en el aula ordinaria, en
lugar de segregarles en centros de Educación Especial u otro tipo de instituciones. Así,
las adaptaciones curriculares aparecen como una solución y como una alternativa para
ayudar a los alumnos con necesidades especiales a desarrollar su potencial de la manera
más satisfactoria posible.
Las adaptaciones curriculares pueden llevarse a cabo en cualquier asignatura, pero el
principal objetivo de esta investigación es analizar cómo se trabajan en el aula de inglés a
nivel de secundaria, y cómo el rendimiento de los alumnos en la segunda lengua se ve
beneficiado por estas medidas. Para ello, se dará una explicación detallada acerca de a
qué se refiere el término “necesidades educativas especiales” y en qué consisten las
adaptaciones curriculares (tanto en términos teóricos como prácticos), seguida de una
descripción de diversos casos particulares (principalmente, casos de retraso mental en
estudiantes de 2º curso) en los que se han utilizado diferentes contenidos y materiales
con este tipo de estudiantes para cumplir nuestro objetivo en el aula de inglés.
Posteriormente, estas actividades y su grado de éxito en el rendimiento de nuestros
estudiantes se analizarán de acuerdo a la teoría de las inteligencias múltiples de Howard
Gardner. Finalmente, se hará una comparación entre los materiales adaptados y los
ordinarios para que podamos comprobar hasta qué punto las adaptaciones curriculares
son positivas para que estos estudiantes adquieran conocimiento de la segunda lengua y
cómo mejoran y evolucionan de manera gradual.
Descriptores: orientación, sistema educativo, principio de normalización / integración
escolar, Educación Especial, adaptaciones curriculares, alumnos con necesidades
educativas especiales, aula ordinaria, aula de inglés a nivel de secundaria, rendimiento
en la segunda lengua, retraso mental, tipos de actividades, inteligencias múltiples,
materiales adaptados.
1. INTRODUCTION: JUSTIFICATION AND AIMS
Curricular adaptations within the field of educational orientation are meant to be a useful
way to help students with special needs to make the most of their physical, cognitive and
social capacities in order to grow both academically and personally. These adaptations go
from a lower to a higher degree of significance, from changes in materials or assessment
to deeper modifications in the contents or the objectives of a particular subject. They also
try to make possible that this kind of students are integrated with the rest of their
classmates in the ordinary classroom, so that they are able to take advantage of
3
collaborative learning in the same environment. Thus, the ESL classroom can be an
opportunity to work on these adaptations and discover how beneficial they are to the
development of these students’ skills in L2 (in comparison with the contents and materials
aimed at the rest of students with no special needs). In other words, this paper will base
its analysis on real results obtained from implementing curricular adaptations to students
with special needs (cognitive, above all) integrated in a high school ESL classroom, so
that one can check if these measures are really effective to help this kind of students to
develop their L2 learning skills in a successful way.
Why is it relevant to focus our attention on the learning process of students with special
needs within the ESL classroom? We live in a society where changes at all levels are
constantly taking place, and in this sense the attention to diversity has proved to be a
notable landmark in the world of education. Through the “mainstream principle” or school
integration, students with special needs can in theory access to the same opportunities
that the rest of their peers in both academic and social terms while they are helped to
overcome their learning difficulties and to gradually evolve by receiving individualised
attention and adapted contents and materials. To what extent this is positive and feasible
in reality is something still in process of evaluation.
2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Special Education in Spain has considerably evolved throughout the last decades. It
started as an initiative at a social and medical level to educate people considered as
“different” in comparison to the average population in terms of performance and learning
rhythm. However, from the late 50s the tendency changed towards a new educational
model against the segregated schools and known as “principio de normalización” (what
Wolf Wolfensberger called “mainstream principle” in Canada in the 70s). In this sense:
normalización significaría que es preciso plantear para las personas que
presentan cualquier hándicap los objetivos más ordinarios posibles, […]
operar sobre el entorno físico de la persona para hacerlo tan similar
como sea posible al del resto de los individuos. […] promover cambios
en la valoración social de las personas discapacitadas, así como de los
servicios específicos que éstas precisan. (González Manjón, 1995, p.10)
Thus, school integration (i.e. “integración escolar”) appeared to be the way in which the
normalisation principle would be applied in practice. In fact, in 1982 the so-called Ley de
4
Integración Social de los Minusválidos was promulgated with the purpose of managing
school integration between ordinary and special centres and in four levels: “1. Integración
completa […]; 2. Integración combinada (unidades ordinarias y de Educación Especial);
Integración parcial (unidades de Educación Especial en centros ordinarios); y 4. No-
integración en Centros específicos (escolarización en centros específicos de Educación
Especial).” (Castanedo, 1998, p.20)
In Spain, educational and professional orientation had been recognised as a right for
every student thanks to the Ley General de Educación (LGE) in 1970, but it was in 1990
when it was seen as a mark of educational quality with the Ley de Ordenación General del
Sistema Educativo (LOGSE). This law went one step further in the attention to diversity in
the educational context, beginning with the introduction of the term “acnee" (alumnos con
necesidades educativas especiales, i.e. students with special educational needs) through
the Real Decreto de Regulación de la Educación Especial in 1985. This concept refers to
those students who perform below or above their physical, intellectual or social capacities
according to what is considered as a normal or average intelligence. In this way,
“curricular adaptations” (which will be explained in detail later on in our study) were
designed to cover the different needs of these students in order to help them develop their
academic and personal potential in the most effective way possible. Nevertheless, the
term “special educational needs” had been used for the first time in the English
educational system thanks to the Warnock Report in 1978 and implemented with the 1981
Education Act. Since that, “many Local Education Authorities (LEAs) have pursued a
policy of integration in which many or, in some cases, almost all pupils are supported in
mainstream schools.” (Montgomery, 1990, p.1)
The Warnock Report changed the existing ideas within the field of Special Education and
it influenced most of the educational systems in other countries. It rejected categorisation
and labelling and it presented the concept of “special educational needs” as a relative and
contextual term, referring to a continuum of students, related to learning difficulties in the
classroom and requiring extraordinary resources. (Marchesi, 2002) Likewise, what
distinguishes this concept from other approaches is that its focus is not on the student as
a problem in himself/herself, but on the educational response carried out to cover his/her
specific needs: “…la condición personal del individuo pasa a ser concebida como un
condicionante, pero lo que realmente determina la especificidad de sus necesidades
educativas […] es la interacción entre éstas y la respuesta educativa que se planifica para
el conjunto de su población de referencia.” (González Manjón, 1995, p.12) On the other
hand, the Warnock Report defined three different types of integration (physical, social and
functional):
5
La integración física se produce cuando las clases o unidades de educación
especial se han construido en el mismo lugar que la escuela ordinaria, pero
continúan manteniendo una organización independiente, si bien pueden
compartir algunos lugares como el patio o el comedor. La integración social
supone la existencia de unidades o clases especiales en la escuela ordinaria,
realizando los alumnos en ellas escolarizados algunas actividades con el
resto de sus compañeros […]. Finalmente, la integración funcional es
considerada la forma más completa de integración. Los alumnos con
necesidades educativas especiales participan a tiempo parcial o completo en
las aulas normales y se incorporan como uno más en la dinámica de la
escuela. (Marchesi, 2002, p.35)
Then, community integration takes place once these students leave school and prepare
for the job market, which involves a great commitment from the part of institutions and
citizens. It is important to mention that school integration benefits all students, not only
those with special needs. Therefore, it has to be seen as a process and not as a mere
management of resources. (Marchesi, 2002)
However, there is a huge debate about school integration and about the possibility of
having a particular curriculum for students with special needs or not. As Diane
Montgomery states, “Should there be a special curriculum for pupils with learning
difficulties?” (Montgomery, 1990, p.44) In other words, should these students learn the
same or different contents than the rest of their classmates? To what extent being
identified as a student with special needs helps or is detrimental to the child in question?
Who has the biggest power of decision in the schooling of these students: professionals or
parents? What is more beneficial for these students: the ordinary classroom or a special
one? (Marchesi, 2002) Our educational system is based on a curriculum that embraces a
series of general educational experiences, objectives, contents and materials. From its
most ideal perspective, school integration aims at keeping the same curriculum for all
students respecting their individual differences. It is a difficult task, though. According to
some scholars, a special curriculum can prevent students with special needs from having
access to ordinary learning experiences, whereas a standard one may not be but a light
version of the real ordinary one. (Montgomery, 1990) Thus, “to enable pupils with learning
difficulties to participate in the ordinary curriculum, we must address ourselves not only to
curriculum development but also to pedagogical change.” (Montgomery, 1990, p.48) To
meet all our students’ needs, then, we must focus our attention on the purpose we want to
achieve (aims and objectives), what learning experiences we want our students to have
6
(contents), how we want to approach those learning experiences (methods) and how we
can check if this organisation is successful or not (assessment).
It is necessary to change our conception of the given curriculum towards more open
criteria in which the curriculum serves as a tool and not as an end for educational
development. In this sense, the curriculum will be modified and gradually adjusted to
cover our students’ needs. (González Manjón, 1995) In the case of students with special
needs, the educational response is put in practise through the so-called “curricular
adaptations” (adaptaciones curriculares). They appeared as an alternative to the previous
Programas de Desarrollo Individual (P.D.I.), which had their origin in the Individualized
Educational Plans (IEPs) of the USA (Public Law 94-142) in 1975. In Spain, the P.D.I.
were devised as an educational instrument aiming at the global development of an
individual both in academic and social terms, as well as covering his/her physical,
cognitive and emotional needs. They were based on an individual and multidisciplinary
initial evaluation (once identified the problem) followed by the implementation of possible
solutions. In addition, they were functional, flexible and modifiable programmes meant to
be feasible in real life. (González Manjón, 1995) They could be classified according to the
curricular structure, the educational resources employed and the degree of integration of
the student: “en un centro específico. […] en el contexto de un aula especial en centro
ordinario. […] en un aula especial y en un aula ordinaria, complementariamente.”
(González Manjón, 1995, p.21) They appeared as the only way to deal with students’
special needs, and, instead of taking into consideration the student and his/her context,
they were student-centred and they started from the dichotomy of a general curriculum
versus a specific or special one, and that was a motive of criticism. In this sense,
curricular adaptations marked a remarkable and positive change, as they evaluated the
student taking into account his/her context and they started from the ordinary curriculum
with individual adaptations depending on the student in question. Moreover, while P.D.I
were developed by a multiprofessional team with the collaboration of teachers, curricular
adaptations are made by the tutor and the teachers with the help of the orientation
department of the school. (Galve Manzano y Trallero Sanz, 2002)
Curricular adaptations involve adaptations in the ways to access the curriculum (i.e.
personal and material resources) and adaptations in the basic curricular elements. Also,
they can be non-significant (if they carry out changes in methodology, activities and
resources) or significant (if they imply changes in the objectives and contents). They can
be designed for any subject, and they go from the lower to the higher degree of
significance (timing > material resources > personal resources > assessment > contents >
objectives). (Domínguez Pérez, 2012-2013) Of course, in order to undertake them, a
7
certain pattern must be followed: “el proceso de adaptación del curriculum a las
necesidades especiales de un individuo dado ha de ser gradual y progresivo, efectuando
en cada momento las modificaciones mínimas estrictamente necesarias para atender a la
diversidad perdiendo el mínimo de comprensividad.” (González Manjón, 1995, p.82) In
order to decide the degree of significance of a curricular adaptation, we must pay attention
to several functional and pedagogical criteria, such as the individual needs of the student
in question, the type of subject in which the activities will be implemented and the
student’s learning style (visual, audial or kinesthetic), as well as contextual and
institutional factors. All these elements work together towards the most integrative
educational response possible so that students with special needs can develop their
academic and personal capacities to their full potential. It is important to clarify that when
curricular adaptations are significant, they are called “individual curricular adaptations”
[adaptaciones curriculares individuales (A.C.I.)]. The characteristics of both significant and
non-significant curricular adaptations can be seen in Figure 2. Before elaborating an
A.C.I., we should have gone through all the previous possibilities of a lower degree of
significance with more or less success to be sure that what the student in question really
needs is a complete individual programme, the last option of the educational response to
his/her situation. As expressed in the following diagram (Figure 1), the whole process has
several steps and it goes from the identification of a student with special needs and the
implementation of some measures from the part of the tutor to the elaboration of an A.C.I.
if the solutions previously undertaken have not been enough:
8
El proceso decisional hasta llegar a la elaboración de una A.C.I. Adaptado de Ruiz (1988).
Figure 1. (González Manjón, 1995, p.111)
Thus, the initial evaluation (evaluación psicipedagógica) of a student with special
educational needs consists of collecting data about different aspects:
El primer apartado centra su valoración en datos no curriculares […] informes
médicos, psicológicos, logopédicos, socioeconómicos, […] situación socio-
familiar del alumno/a […] El segundo apartado de esta evaluación se centra
en datos propiamente escolares y curriculares. La parte central del mismo se
destina a describir el Nivel de Competencias Curriculares del alumno/a. se
trata de valorar las habilidades del alumno en relación a los objetivos/
contenidos del ciclo en que está integrado. […] También se evaluarán las
9
competencias del alumno en relación a los objetivos/ contenidos que se
relacionan con su situación y/o dificultad más característica o más importante.
[…] El tercer apartado describe las necesidades educativas especiales del
alumno y, consecuentemente, los niveles y tipos de adaptaciones curriculares
que requiere.” (Garrido Landívar y Santana Hernández, 2001, p.137-138)
Figure 2. (González Manjón, 1995, p.86)
An A.C.I. (usually a long-term programme) tends to be elaborated for some subjects in
particular (e.g. Spanish Language, Mathematics, English, Science) depending on the type
of special need the student presents, and they can be distinguishable according to how
much they modify the contents related to the course and cycle in which the student is
immersed. (Garrido Landívar y Santana Hernández, 2001) However, an A.C.I. can also be
10
thought as a short-term programme, corresponding to what we know as Didactic Unit (i.e.
a topic or field of knowledge which is covered and worked on in class for several days,
weeks or months with its concrete objectives, contents, methodology, materials, activities,
timing and assessment). In this sense, the A.C.I is carried out modifying and adapting the
different elements of the didactic unit in question to the student’s needs. We will see some
examples of this in the Analysis and the Appendix sections.
From the 80s, the Spanish educational system has considered students with special
needs as “exceptional individuals” (sujetos excepcionales) in physical, psychological or
social terms: “1. Excepcionales Físicos (enfermos crónicos, déficit sensoriales, déficit
motores); 2. Excepcionales Psíquicos (déficit intelectuales, déficit parciales,
superdotados, alteraciones de la personalidad); 3. Inadaptados Sociales
(comportamientos predelincuentes, inadaptación social y delincuencia,
drogodependencia).” (Domínguez Pérez, 2012-2013, p.13-16) This paper will focus on
A.C.I.s implemented in the English classroom and applied to students with learning
difficulties, above all at a cognitive level, but also related to sensory or physical deficits
and ethnic minorities. In any case, before analysing in depth each case, it is important to
give a general overview of what each situation consists of and what they imply both
academically and socially speaking.
Regarding cognitive disorders, the first problem we encounter is a terminological debate.
Is Mental Deficiency (MD) synonymous of Mental Retardation (MR) or are there any
differences between both concepts? Usually, the former is considered to be due to
intrinsic or medical / biological causes, whereas the latter is thought to be the
consequence of extrinsic causes, such as sociocultural factors. (Castanedo, 1998)
Anyway, either of these concepts is used in most contexts as almost synonymous. Maybe,
one of the reasons why it is so difficult to reach to an agreement in the definition is
because some of the terms employed have contemptuous connotations (e.g. disabled /
handicapped), and that is why some countries as Spain and the UK have opted for more
integrative expressions such as “sujetos excepcionales” or “exceptional individuals”.
Basically, we could consider that Mental Retardation is outlined according to three
elements: “el funcionamiento intelectual se determina por el rendimiento en un test de
inteligencia […] la conducta adaptativa, se refiere a […] la capacidad de ser
independiente. […] el período de desarrollo (0 a 18 años).” (Castanedo, 1998, p.69) Most
approaches to MR base their analysis on the results obtained in the previously mentioned
intelligence tests, which measure people’s performance according to certain parameters
represented in the well-known “Campana de Gauss-Laplace” or “Curva Normal de
11
Inteligencia”, as seen in Figure 3. In this sense, someone with an IQ of 70 or less is
considered to have MR, since the average intelligence corresponds to an IQ of 100. This
is the criteria followed by the American Association of Mental Retardation (AAMR), for
example. For its part, the WHO also takes into account the intelligence tests and classifies
people with MR in four types: mild (IQ 50-55 to 70), moderate (IQ 35-40 to 50-55), severe
(IQ 20-20 to 35-40) and profound (IQ < 20-25). This grouping is also interpreted in terms
of education, from people able to develop their academic and social skills (mild and
moderate MR) to those who need supervision to learn the most basic things about self-
care and communication (severe and profound MR). However, there are other
classifications which do not start from the IQ premise, but from other criteria based on the
possible causes of the MR: biological (organic, antenatal), familiar, cultural, psychological,
social or environmental factors. (Castanedo, 1998)
Figure 3. (Montgomery, 1990, p.23)
It is very important to pay attention not only to the existence of an intellectual deficit in a
person, but on the consequences it may have on his/her learning process and on the
development of basic skills who help him/her reach personal autonomy in real life. In this
way, attention and memory play a crucial role. The former involves the “temporal function”
(people with MR have the capacity to pay attention for a short period of time, but they
have more difficulties for activities which require more time) and the selective function
(they fail in their capacity to select relevant stimuli). The latter manages information
12
processing and learning strategies (before information gets to the short-term memory
stage, it needs to be registered through the process of attention so that learning can then
take place, but it is precisely in this transition when these people have problems).
(Castanedo, 1998)
Nowadays, most children with RM are integrated in the ordinary classroom, and, as with
the rest of situations in which an individual curricular adaptation (significant A.C.I. in this
case) is to be elaborated, an initial evaluation of each student has to be made in order to
determine the educational response to his/her needs:
Hay, en primer término, una posible y necesaria evaluación de déficit físicos,
orgánicos, neurológicos sensoriales, motores, perfectamente identificables, a
menudo asociados al retraso mental. Esta evaluación corresponde al médico
especialista […] En otro extremo, en ámbito escolar, está la evaluación de
carácter educativo o curricular en la cual se evalúa la adquisición por parte de
un alumno de aquellos conocimientos, competencias y capacidades que
constituyen el contenido del currículo. Esta evaluación corresponde al
maestro, al profesor, […] Entre ambos extremos […] se extiende una ancha
franja de evaluación precisamente de aquellas capacidades adaptativas
básicas que se consideran constitutivas — o descriptoras — del retraso
mental. (Fierro, 2002, p.287)
It is interesting to notice that there are several features associated with MR not at an
intellectual level, but in terms of personality and social behaviour. For example, people
with MR feel comfortable with activities which imply repetition and routine, since they find
it difficult to adapt to new situations (in fact, intelligence is defined according to this
premise). However, although this can be positive for future industrial and craft jobs, it can
be negative for their personal development. That is why parents and teachers are
responsible for introducing the new in their lives in a gradual way, keeping their emotional
balance but helping them to accept changes as part of their evolution. In addition,
something which characterises these people’s interpersonal relationships is precisely that
persistence, since they are highly emotionally dependent on others. Finally, they have
many difficulties in the development of self-reflection, and they usually have a very low
self-esteem. (Fierro, 2002) They have low levels of motivation because they do not think
they will succeed in what they do, and they constantly need others’ approval in their
actions. Thus, positive reinforcement from the part of parents and above all teachers is
essential to help them increase their self-confidence. (Castanedo, 1998) Integration in the
13
ordinary classroom has proved to be beneficial for these students, but there is still work to
do concerning their social integration both at school and in other contexts: “Quedan
muchas dudas de que se dé la aceptación del RM en unas sociedades donde predomina
la tecnología, […] en las que se concede a la inteligencia uno de los más altos valores
humanos. […] se necesitaría producir un cambio de conciencia individual y colectiva: […]
modificar las actitudes de la sociedad como una sola unidad hacia las personas
excepcionales.” (Castanedo, 1998, p.104)
Castanedo (1998) analyses other kind of phenomena we can encounter within special
educational needs, such as students suffering from a hearing deficit. Depending on the
degree of hearing loss [defined by the place where the damage has occurred (i.e. in the
external, inner or middle ear)], the age at which it appears and how the intervention is
managed, it will have a different impact on speech and language acquisition. We must
also bear in mind the family background of the student, for example if his/her parents are
deaf, and if he/she has other difficulties apart from a hearing deficit. Before an audiometry
and a psychological evaluation are carried out, teachers can discover if a child has
hearing and learning difficulties by observing his/her physical behaviour and his/her
language skills: for instance, if the child is not paying attention to the class, if he/she
frequently catches a cold, if he/she needs to open his/her mouth to breathe in a better
way, if he/she often pricks up his/her ear, if he/she speaks quietly or if he/she has
problems to articulate words. In addition, when evaluating the student’s use of language, it
is important to check his/her range of vocabulary (use of expressive words, for example),
as well as his/her syntactic and grammatical management and his/her capacity to employ
and to understand pragmatic language and non-verbal communication in certain social
situations. As for their intellectual capacity, it is hard to determine, mainly because
traditional psychological tests are based on verbal instructions and they usually require
verbal responses. In fact, when using non-verbal tests with these children, their
intellectual potential virtually does not differ from that of people with no hearing difficulties.
The same happens when trying to relate the academic performance of students with
hearing deficits with their intellectual development; that is, in general terms, one thing has
nothing to do with the other: “… el rendimiento académico de los alumnos con deficits
auditivos no parece correlacionar con su potencial intelectual. […] las áreas de mayor
dificultad son aquellas en las que el lenguaje es más necesario. […] incluso el CI,
obtenido con tests de inteligencia no verbal, no es un buen predictor del rendimiento
académico futuro del niño.” (Castanedo, 1998, p.215) These children are normally
integrated in the ordinary classroom, which of course has implications in the educational
response they receive. Some of them count on the help of qualified interpreters, for
14
instance, and, depending on the degree of significance of their needs, the appropriate
curricular adaptations will be elaborated for them. Finally, Figure 4 shows the relationship
among the degree of hearing loss a person can have, its effects on language
comprehension and the repercussions it has in the analysis of special educational needs
within the school context:
Figure 4. (Castanedo, 1998, p.219)
Concerning physical deficits, they do not require significant curricular adaptations in
general, but only non-significant adaptations in materials and resources. However, there
are a few exceptions (for example, if physical handicaps are combined with other kind of
deficits at a cognitive level or if they occur in students from a cultural and ethnic minority).
In the case we analyse in this paper, the student in question has certain physical
15
limitations and he belongs to the gypsy community, too. Usually, there are external
professional teams expert in educational and pedagogical orientation (Equipos de
Orientación Educativa y Psicopedagógica = EOEPs) which collect data about the
intercultural reality of a certain geographical area and which advise high schools on the
educational actions they can accomplish regarding integration and attention to diversity in
the academic and social context students are immersed in. (Arrillaga Aldama, 1995) Then,
teachers study all the possibilities and they carry out different measures. The main
purpose is to work on tolerance and respect so that these children can learn and develop
their personal identity in the most favourable environment possible.
Finally, this study will deal with a neurological disorder which affects a small percentage of
students (boys, above all) and known as TDAH (Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con o
sin Hiperactividad), which often implies learning difficulties. It can be defined according to
the following features:
desatención (incapacidad de resistirse a estímulos irrelevantes, lo que
dificulta su concentración durante mucho tiempo y, por tanto el mantenimiento
del “trabajo consistente” en una tarea, por un periodo de tiempo más o menos
largo), hiperactividad (alto nivel de actividad motora) e impulsividad (dificultad
de autocontrol en sus emociones, pensamientos y conductas), que se
presentan con mayor intensidad y frecuencia de lo esperado para su edad y
nivel de desarrollo, de tal forma que interfieren de manera negativa en su
aprendizaje y/o comportamiento. Estos síntomas pueden manifestarse
conjuntamente o bien predominar solamente uno de ellos. El TDAH no
siempre cursa con hiperactividad. (STILL, n.d., p.6)
TDAH can also appear combined with other kind of situations, going from learning
difficulties to physical or behavioural disorders. It is important to work on self-esteem with
these students and to foster their self-confidence and their emotional balance. In addition,
these children’s personal environment (family and school above all) can highly influence
on the disorder’s symptoms and contribute to increase or to mitigate them. Thus, early
detection and diagnosis of the problem and an effective medical, familiar and educational
response will benefit these students’ future development. (STILL, n.d., p.7)
Last but not least, we will relate the different special educational needs of our students
and the type of activities we work with them with their learning styles (visual, auditory or
kinesthetic) and with Howard Gardner’s theory of Multiple Intelligences. According to
16
Gardner, we have eight different and independent intelligences, although one of them is
dominant over the rest: linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical,
interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic. (Domínguez Pérez, 2012-2013)
3. METHODOLOGY As the aim of this study is to analyse how the performance in L2 of students with special
needs integrated in the ordinary ESL classroom benefits from the implementation of
curricular adaptations, all data will be based on the comparison of the contents, materials
and activities worked with them and those used by students with no special needs who
follow the standard syllabus.
The participants (1st and 2nd year students between 12 and 16 years old) will be given
several materials on a topic to work with, such as exercises from the textbook, worksheets
to practice grammar and vocabulary, texts, images, board games, crosswords, prompt
dialogues, etc. Once they have dealt with all those activities, the different materials used
and the results obtained in students with special needs will be described, analysed and
interpreted both in quantitative and in qualitative terms and in comparison with the ones of
students with no special needs. This will tell us if curricular adaptations really help those
students with special needs to develop their potential capacities and their performance in
L2 or not and what aspects should be improved. Moreover, according to data and
depending on the success each of the activities proposed has in these students’
performance, it will be possible to determine which of the eight multiple intelligences
defined by Howard Gardner are dominant in them and the kind of learning styles that they
follow (i.e. kinesthetic, visual or auditory):
Alumnos con orientación cinestésica-táctil - […] la relación con los otros es
clave en su aprendizaje y trabajo. […] Uso de la gesticulación al hablar. /
Pierde interés ante un discurso verbal largo. Necesita involucrarse
directamente con lo que aprende. Alumnos con orientación auditiva -
Captamos su nivel de emoción por su tono, timbre y volumen de voz. Crea y
formula sus ideas mediante la discusión. Le gusta escuchar y hablar. […]
Disfruta con el bombardeo de ideas. […] Tiende a utilizar descripciones
largas. Alumnos con orientación visual - Contempla el entorno para analizar la
situación. […] La expresión facial es un magnífico índice de sus emociones.
Piensa con alto nivel de detalle […] Cualquier movimiento o desorden visual le
17
distrae. Organiza sus pensamientos para enseguida llevarlos al papel […].
(Domínguez Pérez, 2012-2013, p.14-16)
Finally, it is important to mention that, while students following the standard syllabus
usually receive all the information in L2 in addition to working on it, students with special
needs receive all the explanations in their L1 and then they are able to work on L2. This
fact will also be analysed from a teaching point of view to see how it can influence the way
in which both kinds of students learn L2.
4. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS
In this section, five different cases of students with special educational needs to whom an
individual and significant curricular adaptation has been applied within the ordinary ESL
classroom will be analysed. The analysis will be divided in several parts according to the
type of special need each student presents (in this case, two children with MR, one child
with a hearing deficit, one child from a cultural minority and with a physical deficit, and
finally a child with TDAH). The contents, materials and activities worked on with them
during a teaching practice period of almost three months will be described in detail and in
comparison with those standardly prepared for 1st and 2nd of E.S.O. students. Then, the
degree of success in their performance will be assessed and interpreted taking into
account the course objectives and students’ learning styles (related to Gardner’s theory of
multiple intelligences). All relevant data about these children’s initial evaluation
(elaborated by the professional psycho-pedagogical team of the high school and with the
help of teachers) and examples of their A.C.I.s and materials will be provided in the
Appendix section of this paper.
To begin with, we will deal with two cases of 2nd year students with mild MR (identified as
students A and B in the Appendix section). They are 16 year-old boys whose intellectual
development and academic competence are lower than those of the average population
of their age. As mentioned before, although they are integrated in the ordinary ESL
classroom, they receive special attention in the form of individual and significant curricular
adaptations, and sometimes other teachers specialised in pedagogical therapy work with
them in a separate classroom (usually reinforcing core subjects as Spanish Language and
Mathematics). The first thing to be noticed is the simplification of contents and materials,
which are based on the ordinary curriculum followed by their peers but which have clear
modifications. Hence, they have their own textbook (which combines grammar and
18
practical exercises) in which all the instructions and explanations are given in Spanish and
in which a brief glossary related to the topic in question (also in Spanish) appears at the
end of each page to help them do the different exercises. Similar to the activities proposed
for the ordinary curriculum, those exercises mainly consist of “fill the gaps” activities
(sentences, pictures, crosswords and dialogues) and matching activities, usually based on
a model to imitate or a pattern to repeat. Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8 are
good examples:
Figure 5. (Hudson, Hardy-Gould and Holwill, 2010, p.114)
19
Figure 6. (Hudson, Hardy-Gould and Holwill, 2010, p.140)
20
Figure 7. (Hudson, Hardy-Gould and Holwill, 2010, p.141)
21
Figure 8. (Hudson, Hardy-Gould and Holwill, 2010, p.144)
These students are quite good at this kind of mechanic exercises in which they use
grammar and learn vocabulary on a topic through practice and in which there is a set
model to follow. However, they fail at creating by themselves from nothing, that is, they
have difficulties when the guidance they receive is minimum and when they are asked to
attempt at doing something alone using their imagination (for example, to invent
sentences or to write a dialogue). In addition, they feel more comfortable with activities
that have to do with writing and reading skills rather than listening or speaking. In fact, as
all the instructions and (grammatical) explanations are given in (or translated into)
Spanish, they hardly receive oral input in English, and that affects their oral production
22
(almost inexistent). By contrast, students following the ordinary syllabus work on
communication skills in a more active way, as shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10:
Figure 9. (Quinn, 2010, p.62)
Figure 10. (Quinn, 2010, p.62)
23
This aspect should definitely be improved in the future, so that these two students in
particular, and students with (mild) MR in general, can access to a more complete
although adapted knowledge of L2. On the other hand, these children are more motivated
with activities which they think they can control, that is, similar exercises with slight
changes that do not break the routine they are used to. They constantly work on writing
and reading skills, and their learning style is more visual and auditory than kinesthetic. In
this sense, linguistic intelligence seems to be dominant in them. However, they have
difficulties with (and they are not interested in) activities related to logical-mathematical,
spatial and interpersonal intelligences which require a certain degree of abstraction,
imagination, critical thinking or social skills, such as role-plays or board games. Mind-
mapping activities, for example, are easier and a little bit more attractive for them,
although they still need individual guidance and set patterns to carry out them. Concerning
intrapersonal intelligence, it can be worked on in class by means of self-esteem building
activities, in which teachers can help these children to better their performance and to
develop their self-confidence when learning L2 through positive reinforcement.
(Armstrong, 2009)
Regardless of their different personalities, these two students have many things in
common: for instance, they always look for their teachers’ approval in all what they do,
they need to feel secure and at ease while they are doing the activities, leaving no room
for improvisation. They are quite emotionally dependent as well, and their personal and
academic balance is based on keeping a certain routine in what they do and in who they
are with every day. In that case, they try to do their best when learning with the purpose of
reaching a higher degree of normalisation in their daily life (and also in comparison to their
peers). They feel anxious for having immediate results in their evolution (precisely, it is
hard to establish evaluation criteria for them), but it is essential to make them realise (and
to realise as teachers or parents) that any single step forward, no matter how small it is or
at what rhythm it occurs, is extremely important and valuable in their development as
students and as individuals.
As for student C, she is a 12 year-old girl with a mild hearing deficit. She is integrated in
the ordinary classroom (in 1st year), but, as students A and B, she sometimes receives
supportive instruction in a separate classroom. In general terms, this child’s hearing
difficulties affect her learning process, her learning style (more visual and kinesthetic than
auditory; she frequently needs to read people’s lips, for example) and her social skills. Her
self-esteem is quite low, as well as her capacity to deal with problems and stress and her
motivation for learning, so it is important to reinforce these aspects from the part of
24
teachers and parents. Academically speaking, she has trouble with reading and writing
activities (in fact, it takes too long for her to do the different tasks and to articulate words,
and she needs to develop her vocabulary). It is hard to determine her intellectual potential,
since, as mentioned before in this paper, it does not need to be in keeping with her
academic performance. As she has difficulties in acquiring basic writing and reading skills,
the activities, contents and materials prepared for her are some steps behind the average
level of her peers. In this sense, and within the English classroom context, she works on
the same topics as the rest of her classmates, but in a more abridged way. Mainly, she
learns vocabulary through different worksheets which combine crosswords (with pictures),
matching activities, handwriting exercises (e.g. order letters to form words and then
practise by writing those words once and again), short sentences, charts to complete and
word search games. Figure 11 shows a good example (in comparison with the contents
and materials aimed at the students who follow the ordinary syllabus, in Figure 12).
Grammar is almost inexistent in those worksheets and it is limited to set patterns to follow
when doing exercises on a topic (for instance, if the student is working on Food and
Health, she can be asked to write sentences following this structure: “I like apples but I
don’t like pears.”) or to brief explanations on the blackboard about a concrete structure
(for example, if working on vocabulary on food, the teacher can explain how to form the
plural of nouns). In theory, the more this student is used to practising these repetitive
tasks, the better she performs, the more autonomous she is and the more mechanically
she learns. However, the problem with this system is that there is little room for change
and that learning of L2 can become too functional and boring instead of dynamic or
creative, which could have negative long-term consequences for the student. As students
A and B, student C is given all the explanations in Spanish, so she does not practise
listening and speaking skills in L2 in class, and that is definitely something to be improved
in the future.
25
Figure 11.
26
Figure 12. (Quinn, 2010, p.74)
The dominant intelligence in this girl seems to be the intrapersonal one, since she prefers
to study on her own and she feels more comfortable and she performs better when she
receives individualized instruction. (Armstrong, 2009) When she does not feel confident
about the activities she has to accomplish (because of her fear of failure, above all), she
can quickly lose her interest in them with a negative attitude. In addition, if working with
student D (they usually work together in the English classroom), she sometimes gets
nervous and she makes a special effort to do her best and to try to understand and to do
the exercises by herself no matter how long it takes (it is a question of pride). She does
not want to make mistakes and she looks for the teacher’s guidance. Precisely, when she
receives special attention from the teacher, she asks her doubts and she shows a more
27
positive and attentive attitude. Thus, it is important to reinforce her self-confidence and to
help her express her feelings towards the subject in more active ways.
Concerning student D, he is a 15 year-old boy with a mild physical deficit and belonging to
the gypsy community. This student is also integrated in the ordinary classroom (in 1st
year) and he receives supportive attention in a separate classroom with other teachers
(usually, twice or three times a week). His individual curricular adaptation not only
includes changes in methodology and materials (due to his physical limitations), but also
in contents (although his intellectual potential corresponds to the one defined by his age,
his academic performance is below the average in comparison to his peers). In social
terms, his cultural identity has caused him some problems of discipline and some
difficulties in his relationship with others, and that is something to be worked on. As for his
learning style, he prefers to study on his own and he feels more comfortable when doing
short and functional tasks which develop his motivation (he could be considered to have a
more kinesthetic learning style instead of visual or auditory). Concerning the English
classroom, he shows interest in activities which require the use of language in a mechanic
and entertaining way, and for example he is quite good at vocabulary exercises which
combine language and pictures, such as crosswords on a particular topic (see Figure 11).
In this sense, he works on the same issues that students following the standard syllabus
deal with, but from a more simplified perspective (Figure 13 can be taken as an example):
28
Figure 13. (Whitney, 2008, n.p.)
When working with student C he tries to prove his superiority over her and to make clear
his ability to understand and to do the different tasks. Having this in mind, his dominant
intelligences seem to be the intrapersonal and the linguistic ones, but it would be
interesting to cultivate his interpersonal intelligence with activities implying cooperative
learning and social skills. (Armstrong, 2009) Moreover, his learning of L2 should be
enlarged and completed by promoting listening and speaking activities and not only
reading and writing ones (although combined with Spanish, it is important to gradually
introduce English as part of his routine so that he gets used to it in a more natural way).
Finally, student E is an 11 year-old boy suffering from TDAH. As in the previous cases,
this child is integrated in the ordinary classroom (in 1st year) and he receives supportive
attention several times a week in a separate classroom with specialised teachers. The
disorder’s symptoms (lack of attention, hyperactivity, impulsiveness) are the origin of his
29
learning difficulties. His intellectual capacity corresponds to the one expected for his age,
but his academic performance is below the average in comparison with his peers. The
objective is to make him gradually abandon the adapted curriculum and join the ordinary
syllabus. But in order to do that, he first needs to reinforce and consolidate some basic
concepts in terms of grammar and vocabulary to be at the same level that his classmates.
In this sense, he has a special book for the English classroom (elaborated by the teacher),
and although he covers the same topics that his peers work on with a very similar
structure, there are some modifications (see Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16 as
representative exercises taken from his book and Figure 17 as an example of the ordinary
textbook). He prefers doing activities than studying, and he feels more comfortable when
the explanations (given in Spanish) and exercises count on a visual support and when
they follow a certain routine that he feels to control. In addition, he benefits from
individualised instruction and he performs better when he has enough time to think about
what he is doing. In this sense, his learning style is more kinesthetic and visual than
auditory and his dominant intelligences seem to be the linguistic and the intrapersonal
ones. Apart from what could be improved in academic terms (for example, to work with
him on listening and speaking skills in L2), it would be positive to help him develop his
interpersonal intelligence with activities requiring his social involvement, such as peer
tutoring or cooperative learning. (Armstrong, 2009) Lastly, for us teachers and also for
parents, it is essential to foster his self-esteem and his self-confidence towards his
learning process and to help him see any single advance as an important step in his
growth as a student and as a person.
30
Figure 14. (Mugüerza, 2012-2013, p.5)
31
Figure 15. (Mugüerza, 2012-2013, p.6)
32
Figure 16. (Mugüerza, 2012-2013, p.34)
33
Figure 17. (Quinn, 2012, p.68)
5. CONCLUSIONS
In order to carry out the main purpose of this paper (i.e. to analyse how performance in L2
of students with special educational needs integrated in the ordinary ESL classroom
benefits from the implementation of curricular adaptations), different aspects have been
taken into account. In the first place, the evolution of special education throughout the last
decades till the present time (particularly in Spain) has been portrayed from a political,
social and pedagogical point of view:
Artículo 74. Escolarización. La escolarización del alumnado que presenta
necesidades educativas especiales se regirá por los principios de
normalización e inclusión y asegurará su no discriminación y la igualdad
efectiva en el acceso y la permanencia en el sistema educativo, pudiendo
34
introducirse medidas de flexibilización de las distintas etapas educativas,
cuando se considere necesario. La escolarización de este alumnado en
unidades o centros de educación especial, que podrá extenderse hasta los
veintiún años, sólo se llevará a cabo cuando sus necesidades no puedan ser
atendidas en el marco de las medidas de atención a la diversidad de los
centros ordinarios. (LOE, 2006, p.36-37)
Secondly, what curricular adaptations consist of and what kind of special educational
needs can be encountered has been explained in detail (only those relevant for this
study). Finally, the description of five particular cases of students with special educational
needs to whom an individual curricular adaptation has been applied. These have been
analysed from quantitative and qualitative perspectives with several examples of the
contents and materials elaborated for them, in comparison to those worked on by students
following the ordinary syllabus for the English classroom.
After the analysis, this paper reaches to the conclusion that curricular adaptations do help
students with special educational needs integrated in the ordinary ESL classroom to
gradually develop and better their academic performance in L2, although some aspects
should be improved (e.g. working on listening and speaking skills and not only on reading
and writing; promoting cooperative learning and social skills; combining Spanish and
English when addressing these students as teachers; helping students to see changes as
part of their evolution without breaking their emotional balance). In any case, and even
though there are still things to do, all the advances which have taken place in this field
during the last decades in our country have definitely been extremely positive and
important to help these children integrate in society and develop not only as students but
also as human beings. Thus, going on in the same direction will probably give us even
more rewarding results in both educational and social terms in the future.
35
6. REFERENCES Alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales / específicas. Universidad de
Castilla-La Mancha. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.uclm.es/profesorado/ricardo/ee/necesidades.html
(consulted in June 2013)
Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom. 3rd edition.
Retrieved from
http://issuu.com/stedranet/docs/multipleintelligencesintheclassroom
(consulted in June 2013)
Arrillaga Aldama, M. (1995). Minorías Culturales: Tratamiento Educativo. En E.
González (Coord.), Necesidades educativas especiales. Intervención
psicoeducativa.
Castanedo, C. (1998). Bases pedagógicas de la educación especial. Evaluación e
interpretación. Colección Campus, vol.7. Madrid: Editorial CCS, 2ª edición.
Coll, C.; Marchesi, Á. y Palacios, J. (2002). Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 3.
Trastornos del desarrollo y necesidades educativas especiales. Madrid:
Editorial Alianza, 2ª edición.
Domínguez Pérez, D. (2012-2013). Material for the subject Procesos y Contextos
Educativos (Máster en Formación del Profesorado) elaborated by the
teacher on the following topics: “Atención a la Diversidad”, “Adaptaciones
Curriculares” and “Estudios en torno a la Inteligencia”.
English With Crosswords. Book 1: Elementary level. (2001). Photocopiable edition.
ELI Publishing.
Fierro, A. (2002). 10. Los alumnos con retraso mental. En C. Coll, Á. Marchesi y
J. Palacios (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 3. Trastornos del
desarrollo y necesidades educativas especiales.
36
Galve Manzano, J.L. y Trallero Sanz, M. (2002). Adaptaciones curriculares. De la
teoría a la práctica. Fundamentación teórica. Vol. 1. Madrid: Editorial
CEPE, S.L.
Garrido Landívar, J. y Santana Hernández, R. (2001). Cómo elaborar
adaptaciones curriculares de centro, de aula e individuales. Madrid:
Editorial CEPE, S.L.
González Manjón, D. (1995). Adaptaciones curriculares. Guía para su elaboración.
Málaga: Ediciones Aljibe, S.L.; 2ªedición.
González, E. (Coord.) (1995). Necesidades educativas especiales. Intervención
psicoeducativa. Colección Campus, vol.1. Madrid: Editorial CSS.
Hudson, J.; Hardy-Gould, J.; Holwill, H. and Medina, S. (2010). 1000+ Activities for
Mixed Ability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marchesi, Á. (2002). 1. Del lenguaje de la deficiencia a las escuelas inclusivas.
En C. Coll, Á. Marchesi y J. Palacios (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y
educación. 3. Trastornos del desarrollo y necesidades educativas
especiales.
Marchesi, Á. (2002). 2. La práctica de las escuelas inclusivas. En C. Coll, Á.
Marchesi y J. Palacios (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 3.
Trastornos del desarrollo y necesidades educativas especiales.
Montgomery, D. (1990). Special needs in ordinary schools. Children with learning
difficulties. New York: Nichols Publishing Company.
Mugüerza García, H. (2012-2013). Cuaderno de Trabajo en Inglés (material
elaborated by the English teacher for a particular student).
Quinn, R. (2010). Switch 1. Student’s Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quinn, R. (2010). Switch 2. Student’s Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37
Selfe, L. and Stow, L. (1989). Understanding children with special needs. London:
Unwin Hyman Ltd.
Special needs education within the education system in Spain. (n.d.). Retrieved
from http://www.european-agency.org/country-information/spain/national-
overview/special-needs-education-within-the-education-system
(consulted in July 2013)
STILL. Asociación Balear de padres de niños con TDAH. (n.d.). Guía práctica con
recomendaciones de actuación para los centros educativos en los casos
de alumnos con TDAH (Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con o sin
Hiperactividad). Palma de Mallorca: Asociación STILL.
Whitney, N. (2008). New Thumbs Up! 1. Student’s Book. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
_______________________________________________________________________
38
7. APPENDIX
INFORMES INICIALES DE LOS ALUMNOS CON NECESIDADES EDUCATIVAS
ESPECIALES CONFECCIONADOS POR EL DEPARTAMENTO DE ORIENTACIÓN DEL
CENTRO PARA LOS PROFESORES DE LAS DISTINTAS ÁREAS.
IES. CLARA CAMPOAMOR – DPTO. DE ORIENTACIÓN – PROGRAMA DE INTEGRACIÓN EDUCATIVA
ALUMNO A
DATOS PERSONALES
Nombre:
Fecha de nacimiento:
Domicilio: Teléfono:
Nombre del padre: Nombre de la Madre:
NECESIDADES EDUCATIVAS ESPECIALES
Elegir una ubicación idónea en el aula (próxima al docente y a algún alumno modelo) que le ayude
en su proceso de aprendizaje y en su socialización.
Planificación del trabajo escolar.
Supervisión en la organización del material, espacios y tiempos.
Centrar su atención en lo que se está trabajando en el momento.
Entrenamiento en hábitos y técnicas de estudio. Supervisión de la agenda.
Reforzar sus esfuerzos y éxitos para aumentar su autoestima.
Potenciar la relación familia-centro a través del trabajo tutorial para llevar una actuación coherente
en su educación.
Control de asistencia a clase.
Utilización de la agenda diariamente como una medida de autocontrol, responsabilidad y fijación de la atención.
ASPECTOS DE ADAPTACIÓN E INSERCIÓN SOCIAL
Insatisfacción personal.
Somatización del desajuste afectivo (tendencia a sentir molestias y dificultades corporales).
Imagen desajustada de sí mismo, con un exagerado optimismo, confiado e inmaduro.
39
Es introvertido y presenta hostilidad hacia los demás en algunas ocasiones.
ESTILO DE APRENDIZAJE
Es metódico en el estudio.
Tiene motivación e interés por el aprendizaje.
Prioriza los resultados obtenidos al proceso de Aprendizaje.
Le cuesta asumir errores descargando toda culpa en los demás.
NIVEL DE COMPETENCIA CURRICULAR
El nivel de competencia curricular corresponde a segundo ciclo de primaria. Sus mayores dificultades están
relacionadas con la comprensión lectora, razonamiento y resolución de problemas matemáticos.
ADAPTACIONES
CURSO 2010-2011: Inglés, Ciencias Naturales, Ciencias Sociales, Lengua Matemáticas y Recuperación de
Lengua.
CURSO 2011-12: Inglés, Ciencias Naturales, Ciencias Sociales, Lengua y Matemáticas.
PENDIENTES
No tiene pendientes.
ORIENTACIONES
• Reforzar su autoestima.
• Atención individualizada.
• Seguimiento sistemático con la familia.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ALUMNO B
DATOS PERSONALES
Nombre:
Fecha de nacimiento:
Domicilio: Teléfono:
Nombre del padre: Nombre de la Madre:
NECESIDADES EDUCATIVAS ESPECIALES
Mejorar habilidades sociales.
40
Desarrollar su nivel de autonomía a la hora de realizar las tareas escolares.
Planificación del trabajo escolar
Centrar su atención en lo que se está trabajando en el momento.
ASPECTOS DE ADAPTACIÓN E INSERCIÓN SOCIAL
Bien aceptado en el grupo-clase y fuera de él.
Respeta las normas y se muestra afecto con los profesores.
ESTILO DE APRENDIZAJE
Tiene cierta tendencia a evitar el esfuerzo, aunque se siente motivado por los aprendizajes
escolares.
Trabaja mejor con instrucciones precisas y cortas.
NIVEL DE COMPETENCIA CURRICULAR
Tanto en Lengua como en Matemáticas se sitúa en torno al segundo ciclo de Educación Primaria.
ADAPTACIONES
CURSO 2010-11: Inglés, Ciencias Naturales, Ciencias Sociales, Educación Física, Educación Visual, Lengua,
Matemáticas, Tecnología y Refuerzo de Lengua.
CURSO 2011-2012: Inglés, Ciencias Naturales, Ciencias Sociales, Lengua, Matemáticas y Refuerzo de
Lengua.
PENDIENTES
No tiene pendientes.
ORIENTACIONES
Necesita muchas instrucciones y pautas para realizar las tareas.
Estar cerca del profesor porque está muy pendiente de los compañeros.
Reforzar de forma explícita tanto los resultados como su esfuerzo durante el
proceso.
Potenciar las habilidades sociales, invitándole a participar en actividades extraescolares:
campeonatos escolares, refuerza…
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ALUMNO C
Los datos reflejados en este informe se han obtenido de la evaluación psicopedagógica.
41
DATOS PERSONALES
Nombre:
Fecha de nacimiento:
Domicilio: Teléfono:
Nombre del padre: Nombre de la Madre:
NECESIDADES EDUCATIVAS ESPECIALES
Elegir una ubicación idónea en el aula (próxima al docente y a algún alumno modelo) que le ayude
en su proceso de aprendizaje y en su socialización.
Se fatiga con facilidad y le cuesta mantener la atención en una tarea, incluso cuando se trata de
tareas que sabe resolver.
Planificación del trabajo escolar.
Supervisión en la organización del material, espacios y tiempos.
Centrar su atención en lo que se está trabajando en el momento.
No gestiona bien su tiempo cuando se enfrenta sola a una tarea y comete múltiples errores por falta
de atención.
Entrenamiento en hábitos y técnicas de estudio. Supervisión de la agenda.
Habla rápida y entrecortada, poco inteligible, empleo de estructuras sintácticas sencillas.
Potenciar la relación familia-centro a través del trabajo tutorial para llevar una actuación coherente
en su educación.
Acción tutorial para reforzar autoestima y favorecer su participación en clase. Debe interpretar sus
equivocaciones como parte del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje y no como fracasos.
Dificultades muy importantes en lectoescritura. Falta de vocabulario.
Utilización de la agenda diariamente como una medida de autocontrol, responsabilidad y fijación de la atención.
Controles más cortos, con aprendizajes básicos, a veces de tipo oral, o escritos pero de respuesta múltiple.
ASPECTOS DE ADAPTACIÓN E INSERCIÓN SOCIAL
Sociable pero infantil, teniendo poca autonomía para resolver sus conflictos y requiriendo a veces la
intervención del profesor.
Se relaciona bien con el profesorado y en general respeta las normas.
Baja autoestima.
REQUIERE PAUTAS Y LÍMITES CLAROS, asunción de responsabilidades y adquisición de mayor
autonomía.
ESTILO DE APRENDIZAJE
Poca motivación hacia el aprendizaje.
42
Falta de motivación e interés por el aprendizaje.
Prioriza los resultados obtenidos al proceso de Aprendizaje.
Le cuesta asumir errores descargando toda culpa en los demás
NIVEL DE COMPETENCIA CURRICULAR
ÁREAS INSTRUMENTALES: Segundo ciclo de educación primaria.
En el resto de áreas habrá que valorar.
ADAPTACIONES
CURSO 2011-12: Presenta un desfase curricular de más de dos años en las áreas instrumentales que ha
requerido adaptaciones curriculares significativas (nivel de 3º EP).
PENDIENTES
No tiene pendientes.
ORIENTACIONES
• Reforzar su autoestima.
• Atención individualizada.
• Seguimiento sistemático con la familia.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ALUMNO D
Los datos reflejados en este informe han sido recogidos del informe que ha llegado al instituto del EOEP de la zona.
DATOS PERSONALES
Nombre:
Fecha de nacimiento:
Domicilio: Teléfono:
Nombre del padre: Nombre de la Madre:
NECESIDADES EDUCATIVAS ESPECIALES
Ambiente estructurado y predecible.
43
Necesita métodos y materiales compensadores de sus limitaciones físicas. En escritura las TIC
pueden suponer una valiosa aportación.
Necesita actividades de aprendizaje cooperativo.
Necesita priorizar un mayor conocimiento de sí mismo en relación con el mundo laboral.
Necesita desarrollar y potenciar de manera específica sus capacidades mnemotécnicas.
Necesita desarrollar y potenciar el autocontrol.
Necesita aprendizajes funcionales que promuevan su motivación e interés, en todas las áreas y en
particular en matemáticas.
Es impulsivo y poco constante en la realización de la tarea. Le ayudan las tareas cortas.
Tiene dificultades de escucha y atención y le gusta llamar la atención del profesor.
ASPECTOS DE ADAPTACIÓN E INSERCIÓN SOCIAL
En el momento actual está presentando muchas dificultades para asumir y respetar las normas de
conducta del aula y del centro. Lo que más le gusta es salir a diario con el grupo de amigos y las
relaciones con las chicas, abiertamente reconoce que no le interesan nada “los libros”. Sin embargo
le gusta leer, lo que rechaza es el estudio.
Según la información aportada por sus profesores pretende no pasar desapercibido, reafirmando su
identidad, hablando alto, pretendiendo ser respetado por sus iguales y respetando en general más la
figura masculina.
ESTILO DE APRENDIZAJE
• En el área de Lenguaje muestra un buen nivel en velocidad y comprensión en la lectura. El
aprendizaje de contenidos gramaticales le desmotivan, no se esfuerza en aprenderlo. Escribe con
letra legible, no cuida la presentación de los trabajos.
• En inglés solo muestra interés ocasionalmente.
• En el área de matemáticas observan un rechazo al área que se traduce en no querer aprender las
tablas ni interesarse por ningún contenido del área.
• Los mejores resultados los ha obtenido en conocimiento del medio.
• Plástica, no muestra ningún interés.
• Educación Física, se ha comenzado a involucrar en el área en actividades que dan más importancia
a la fuerza, la resistencia y el juego en grupo, el resto de actividades las rechaza. Por sus
características físicas tiene poca flexibilidad y coordinación motora.
• Música, es disruptivo.
• Prefiere trabajar solo.
NIVEL DE COMPETENCIA CURRICULAR
En Lengua presenta dificultades de expresión oral, falta de coherencia y expresión escrita, confusión de
fonemas…Necesita utilizar referentes temporales y nexos que den continuidad al discurso. Precisa pautas
para elaborar una narración y necesita reforzar ortografía y vocabulario. En Matemáticas, tiene automatizadas
las operaciones de suma y resta, multiplicación por tres cifras y división por dos cifras (iniciada). Resuelve
44
problemas en los que se ven implicadas suma y resta. Afianzar objetivos curriculares de segundo ciclo de E.
Primaria e iniciar el trabajo sobre los objetivos mecánicos de tercer ciclo.
ADAPTACIONES
CURSO 2010-11: Adaptación en todas las áreas.
CURSO 2011-12: Según el informe del EOEP, necesita una adaptación curricular en el área de Educación
Física y en el área de Plástica y en lengua y matemáticas. El resto de áreas se valorarán por el equipo
docente. No olvidar sus dificultades motoras finas y gruesas.
PENDIENTES
No tiene pendientes.
ORIENTACIONES
Necesita instrucciones y correcciones claras, asegurándonos de que las comprenda.
Favorece su aprendizaje un estilo directivo-afectivo y prefiere trabajar individualmente.
Ayudarle en la planificación del trabajo escolar.
Precisa instrucciones paso a paso en tareas y más tiempo para su ejecución.
Utilización de la agenda diariamente como una medida de autocontrol, responsabilidad y fijación de la atención.
Favorecer la implicación familiar en relación al aprendizaje y orientación profesional de Juan.
Siempre que se pueda, utilizará preferentemente los materiales que usen sus compañeros.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ALUMNO E
Los datos reflejados en este informe han sido recogidos del informe que ha llegado al instituto del EOEP de la zona.
DATOS PERSONALES
Nombre:
Fecha de nacimiento:
Domicilio: Teléfono:
Nombre del padre: Nombre de la Madre:
45
NECESIDADES EDUCATIVAS ESPECIALES
Ambiente estructurado y predecible.
Ayudarle en la planificación del trabajo escolar, secuenciando los pasos y centrando su atención en
las tareas que en cada momento vaya a realizar.
Permitirle asistir al servicio por un problema de control de esfínteres.
Incrementar de forma progresiva su inserción en los aprendizajes del grupo de referencia.
Aumentar su confianza facilitando el éxito ante tareas nuevas. Responde bien a la ayuda tutorial.
Favorecer su nivel de atención.
Utilización de la agenda diariamente como una medida de autocontrol, responsabilidad y fijación de la atención.
Coordinación con la familia para el seguimiento escolar y para ofrecerle pautas que afiancen sus
hábitos de estudio.
ASPECTOS DE ADAPTACIÓN E INSERCIÓN SOCIAL
Se relaciona bien con los iguales.
Acata las normas y no falta al respeto.
ESTILO DE APRENDIZAJE
Prefiere realizar actividades a dedicar tiempo al estudio.
NIVEL DE COMPETENCIA CURRICULAR
Presenta un nivel de competencia curricular situado en torno a un 5º de Primaria.
ADAPTACIONES
Valorar la utilización de ACIS por parte del equipo docente. El EOEP recomienda ir dejando paulatinamente
las ACIS para incorporarse al ritmo normal del grupo de referencia.
PENDIENTES
No tiene pendientes.
ORIENTACIONES
Facilitar su integración dentro del grupo; reforzando sus intervenciones y creando un clima de
seguridad que le permita preguntar y consultar cuando lo necesite.
Entrevistas periódicas con la madre para ajustar el trabajo del alumno a las exigencias.
Elevar su nivel de expectativas.
Uso de la agenda para organizar el trabajo.
Ubicarle en un lugar donde pueda centrar su atención.
Proponerle tareas que le permitan moverse: borrar la pizarra, repartir libros.
Estructurar bien su trabajo.
Apoyo visual de las explicaciones orales.
46
Permitirle que termine las tareas en tiempo extra.
Utilizar el refuerzo positivo sin llegar a sobreprotegerle.
Utilizar la tutoría con iguales.
____________________________________________________________________________________
47
EJEMPLO DE ADAPTACIÓN CURRICULAR INDIVIDUAL (A.C.I.) PARA EL ÁREA DE
INGLÉS (1º E.S.O.)
48
49
50