Office of Nuclear Physics
Collaboration Meeting 5/19/08 #1
nEDM Reworked Schedule
Kim Selvage
Project Controls Analyst
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #2
The Reworked WBS Number of activities reduced by 339
Each subsystem has about 100 activities
1.9 now has activities that have been identified to take place after CD-4
Consistency added in naming activities• P-Preliminary• F-Final• O-Operating
All logic ties and resources transferred to the activity level
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #3
Resource Changes Added a cost loaded resource dictionary
• More realistic but also more complicated• A resource rate can be updated easily
Several rate corrections made• Approximately $350K increase
Duplicate resources consolidated
Over allocation can now be identified
Added NSF/DOE Coding by activity
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #4
Change is Good. Really!! The better our baseline, the easier the
effort to update the schedule and accurately predict the outcome.
Understand that everyone will have different degrees of change. The impact will be different for each subsystem.
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #5
Overview of Changes by Subsystem 1.5
• 1.5.8 Test Cryostat (new activity, $140K)• 1.5.9 3He Spin-Holding Coil – new activities
1.6• Rate Correction ($52K)
1.8• More labor hours added. ($590K)• Missing ODC added. ($345K)
1.10• Rate Correction ($296K)
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #6
Transfer of Dollars (Base $s) -1.1.2.10 Laser induced fluorescence Deleted $37,037
-1.3.3.3 Liquid helium refrigerator for precool from 4 K to 1.5 K (WP) Moved $’s $77,658 to +1.3.3.5.3.3 Construction of refrigerator by vendor
-1.3.5 Cryovessel Assembly, Testing and Operation Infrastructure (WP) Duplicate activity deleted $467,801
-1.3.3.4 First Dilution Refrigerator (WP) Moved $97,665 to R&D +1.1.2.13 Dual Use Cryostat Dilution Refrigerator
-1.5.11.6 O- Transport Conventional Shield and Degaussing System had $34,515 moved to +1.9 O- Transport Conventional Shield and Degaussing System
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #7
CD-1 vs Current Schedule
ID WBS Task Name Total Slack BaselineStart
Start BaselineFinish
Finish BaselineDuration
Dur Baseline Cost CD-2CostnCont
1 1 EDM Project 0 d? 11/15/05 11/15/05 11/14/13 2/14/16 2921.4 d 3744 d? $17,196,313 $18,382,464
2 1.1 Research & Development 0 d 4/1/06 4/1/06 12/24/07 11/2/08 633 d 947 d $560,133 $550,985
121 1.2 Polarized Neutron Beamline and Shielding41 d 4/1/06 4/1/06 12/23/12 11/28/12 2458.4 d 2434 d $2,213,737 $2,232,086
174 1.3 Cryostats, Refrigerators and Related Equipment371 d 10/1/06 12/3/06 6/7/10 6/30/11 1345.08 d 1671 d $4,855,524 $4,211,804
276 1.4 3He Services (He3S) 602 d 1/3/07 2/14/07 5/26/13 10/11/12 2335.84 d 2067 d $1,568,088 $1,496,720
440 1.5 Magnets & Magnetic Shielding 0 d 1/2/07 2/14/07 4/9/12 8/20/13 1923.52 d 2380 d $2,669,936 $2,971,523
537 1.6 Central Detector System 223 d? 4/1/06 4/1/06 4/17/11 1/16/12 1842.76 d 2117 d? $1,816,270 $1,888,193
667 1.7 Electronics, Simulations, Data Analysis 0 d? 1/3/07 4/1/06 12/14/10 6/14/11 1441.47 d 1901 d? $576,113 $576,131
804 1.8 Infrastructure 676 d 1/3/07 2/14/07 6/7/11 8/14/10 1616.4 d 1278 d $960,567 $2,028,051
899 1.9 Assembly and Commissioning 0 d? 6/7/10 6/30/10 9/14/13 2/14/16 1195.32 d 2056 d? $534,978 $575,918
956 1.10 Project Office 493 d 4/1/06 4/1/06 11/13/13 11/11/13 2784 d 2782 d $1,440,967 $1,851,054
966 1.11 Cash Flow 0 d 4/1/06 4/1/06 1/1/12 1/2/12 2102 d 2103 d $0 $0
991 1.12 Critical Decisions 0 d 11/15/05 11/15/05 11/14/13 3/19/15 2921.4 d 3412 d $0 $0
1012 1.13 External Milestones 220 d 4/1/06 4/1/06 8/1/09 8/1/09 1219 d 1219 d $0 $0
Finish of nEDM ProjectNew Guidance Current9/7/14 3/19/15
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #8
CE Budget Profiles ($k)FY’06 FY’07 FY’08 FY’09 FY’10 FY’11 FY’12 FY’13 FY’14 Total
DOE
Guid.
180 1,200 2,500 1,100 4,000 6,000 3,000 575 550 19,105
DOE
Use
180 1,200 2,125 1,475 4,000 2,300 415 100 ? 11,795
DOE
G-U
375 -375 3,700 2,585 475 550 7,310
NSF
R&D/E
200 200
NSF
Mgmt.
40 50 50 140
NSF
TPC
200 2,510 2,150 2,450 7,310
NSF
Prop.
2,550 2,200 2,500 7,250
NSF
Use
200 2,550 2,200 1,425 450 275 350 7,450
NSF
P-U
0 1,075 -450 -275 -350 0
TPC 180 1,400 2,125 3,985 6,150 3,675 865 375 350 19,105
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #9
1.4 3He Systems
Steve Williamson (Illinois)
1.2 Polarized Neutron Beam Line & Shielding
Wolfgang Korsch (Kentucky)
1.1 Research & Development
Martin Cooper (LANL)
1.6 Central Detector Systems
Takeyasu Ito (LANL)
1.8 Infrastructure
Walt Sondheim (LANL)
1.9 Assembly & Commissioning
Paul Huffman (NCSU)
1.7 Electronics, Computers, Simulations,
Data AnalysisJim Miller (Boston)
1.5 Magnets and Magnetic Shielding
Brad Filippone (Cal Tech)
1.3 Cryostats, Refrigerators and
Related Equipment
David Haase (NCSU)
1.10 ProjectManagement
Martin Cooper (LANL)
Organizational ChartnEDM Project
Martin Cooper (Contractor Project Manager)
Kim Selvage (Project Controls Analyst)
KeyGreen: logic reviewed, resource loaded scheduleYellow: still needs to work out a few issuesOrange: refined the intersystem logic
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #10
Operation Tasks “O-” added to task name
Identifies activities that will happen after CD4
By moving them to the bottom of the schedule, individual Subsystems will have a more accurate finish date
Will not be part of CD-2/3a Schedule
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #11
Snapshot of OperationsID WBS Task Name Start Finish Dur
932 1.9.4 B-Shield Assembly and Commissioning at FNPB6/7/12 11/22/15 1264 d?
933 1.9.4.1 O- Hold Shield at Caltech 6/7/12 6/23/13 382 d
934 1.9.4.2 O- Disconnect cryostat plumbing 3/20/15 3/24/15 5 d
935 1.9.4.3 O- Transport Conventional Shield and Degaussing System3/20/15 7/9/15 112 d
936 1.9.4.4 O- Roll cryostat back 3/25/15 3/29/15 5 d
937 1.9.4.5 O- Mate neutronics 3/30/15 4/7/15 9 d
938 1.9.4.6 O- Roll cryostat forward 4/8/15 4/12/15 5 d
939 1.9.4.7 O- Reconnect cryostat plumbing 4/13/15 4/17/15 5 d
940 1.9.4.8 O- Neutron beamline installed 4/17/15 4/17/15 0 d
941 1.9.4.9 O- Receive Tested B-shield at the FNPB 7/9/15 7/9/15 0 d
942 1.9.4.10 O- Bolt lower B-shields to platform 7/10/15 7/27/15 18 d
943 1.9.4.11 O- Assemble/Debug B-shield DAQ 7/10/15 7/27/15 18 d
944 1.9.4.12 O- Mount platform assembly to rails and roll under cryostat7/28/15 9/1/15 36 d
945 1.9.4.13 O- Scaffolding Installed at FNPB 9/1/15 9/1/15 0 d
946 1.9.4.14 O- Install protection on lower B-shield 9/2/15 9/10/15 9 d
947 1.9.4.15 O- Assemble upper portion of B shield and protection9/11/15 11/3/15 54 d
948 1.9.4.16 O- Test B-shields 11/4/15 11/21/15 18 d
949 1.9.4.17 O- B-shields Assembled/Commissioned 11/21/15 11/21/15 0 d
950 1.9.4.18 O- Install Shielding in Building 11/22/15 11/22/15 1 d?
951 1.9.4.19 O- Install Cosmic Ray Vetoes 11/22/15 11/22/15 1 d?
952 1.9.5 Commissioning at the FNPB 3/19/15 2/14/16 332 d
953 1.9.5.1 O- DAQ final testing/acceptance 3/19/15 3/19/15 0 d
954 1.9.5.2 O- Commissioning Run 11/23/15 2/14/16 84 d
955 1.9.5.3 O- Assembly/ Commissioning Complete 2/14/16 2/14/16 0 d
956 1.10 Project Office 4/1/06 11/11/13 2782 d
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #12
Known Issues that Need to be Resolved 7 day workweek converted to 5 day workweek
Over allocation of several people• Examples on next slide
Need FY08 Rate Table • Needs to be costed
Need to match funding profile
Need to update the Resource Dictionary with current workforce
Separate O’s into a subproject
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #13
Over allocated ResourcesBoston - Jim Miller
Caltech - Brad Plaster
Caltech - Engineer - Boissevain
Duke - Faculty - Haiyan Gao
Duke - Grad Student - Qiang (Alan) Ye
Duke - Staff - Dutta
UIUC - Draftsman - D1
UIUC - Engineer - Bartoszek
UIUC - Grad Stud - Yoder
UIUC - Technician - Eric Thorsland
IU - Staff - Long
LANL - Tech - Gomez
LANL-TSM Sondheim
LANL-TSM Cooper
NCSU - Cryogenic Tech 1
NCSU - Cryogenic Tech 2
NCSU - Elect Tech - Patrick Mulkey
NCSU - Electrical Eng - Bret Carlson
NCSU - Faculty - David Haase
NCSU - Mech Eng - Matthew Busch
NCSU - Software Engineer
NCSU - Student Tech
ORNL - Engineer-Rick Allen
ORNL - Staff - Procurement
ORNL - Technician 1
ORNL - Technician 2
SFU - Faculty - Mike Hayden
Berk - Grad Student - Sushkov
Yale - Staff - Lamoreaux
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #14
In Closing… The changes have made a better baseline
Still need to make many more changes
Draft version is available
Office of Nuclear Physics
Collaboration Meeting 5/19/08 #15
nEDM Preparing for CD-2/3a
Kim Selvage
Project Controls Analyst
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #16
CD2/3a Work List Complete R&D to establish technical feasibility
Calculation of forecasted sensitivity based on R&D
Build schedule and work packages to be baselined from R&D results
Identify Work Package Leaders
Build Cost Book
Complete preliminary engineering and selected cryogenic final engineering
Convert preliminary documents to final documents
MOUs between LANL and collaborating institutions
Establish NSF support of the project and integrate it with the DOE support
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #17
Steps Update your rate table
Develop your WBS in the MS Project Schedule
Link your activities – Revise your logic
Logically group your activities into Work Packages
Document your changes
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #18
Rate Tables CD-1 used FY06 rate table
CD-2/3a will use a current FY08 rate table• All institutions will submit their current
information• Escalation will take place FY09 out• WP will be updated as well as the schedule• Approximately 60 procurements > $25K
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #19
Example of Procurement <$25K 1.4.10.3 V2 Valve, V4 Valve, V5 Valve
$70,000• 1.4.10.3.3 Procure V4 Valve Bodies and Seat
$15,000• 1.4.10.3.4 Procure V2 Valve Body and Seat
$10,000• 1.4.10.3.5 Procure V5 Valve Bodies and Seat
$15,000• 1.4.10.3.6 Procure V2 Valve Actuator
$10,000• 1.4.10.3.7 Procure V4 Valve Actuator
$10,000• 1.4.10.3.8 Procure V5 Valve Actuator
$10,000
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #20
FY2010 Field Budget Call
Fiscal YearAnnualFactor
CumulativeFactor
AnnualFactor
CumulativeFactor Proc Labor
FY09 1.02 1.020 1.044 1.044 -0.002 -0.001
FY10 1.02 1.040 1.045 1.091 -0.004 -0.004
FY11 1.02 1.061 1.045 1.140 -0.005 -0.008
FY12 1.02 1.082 1.045 1.191 -0.006 -0.011
FY13 1.02 1.104 1.045 1.245 -0.008 -0.016
FY14 1.02 1.126 1.045 1.301 -0.010 -0.020
FY15 1.02 1.149 1.045 1.360 -0.012 -0.025
Difference from CD-1Procurement Labor
Escalation Factors
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #21
Resources in Schedule Schedule is resource loaded
• Duplicate resources combined• Do not enter resources or procurements in
schedule• Project Office will enter the resources and
procurements based on your work packages• Define how the costs will be spread over the
duration of the activity by selecting an accrual method
– Prorated– Start– End
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #22
Revising Logic Do not put predecessors/successors on
summary tasks
When to use FS and SS
Lag vs. Constraints Discussion
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #23
The Small Version of the Big Picture
Development
Feedback
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #24
Performance Baseline SSM Effort (9/19)
Work Breakdown Structure in MS Project
Verify FY08 Rate Table
Work Packages• Contingency Analyses
Risk Table
WBS Dictionary
Cost Books (NEW)
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #25
Cost Book Needs The Basis-of-Estimate (BOE) shall contain supporting
information substantiating each cost data item • vendor quotes• engineering calculations• graphs• figures
(BOE code) which characterizes the uncertainty associated with the estimate. The categories established for the project in decreasing order of confidence include:• CP, catalog prices for off-the-shelf items;• VQ, vendor quotations based on finished drawings, followed by
vendor quotes on preliminary drawings;• HD, historical data from previous experience with similar
components and efforts; and• EE, engineering estimates based on the estimator’s judgment and
experience.
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #26
Cost Book Example
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #27
WP Leaders Verified Each Subsystem Manager will receive
a worksheet• Fill out the WP Managers• The WP Manager should not be a limited
term employee• How will you handle when a person
moves from one institution to another?• Return to Kim on Tuesday • The WP managers will work with the
Subsystem Managers
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #28
Work Packages Designed to allow you to estimate burdened
costs and generate work packages in preparation for CD-2/3a and beyond.
This process will also establish the contingency on each activity.
Current labor and overhead rates will be loaded into a linked rate table. You can estimate total costs using easy-to-use drop down menus and entry fields.
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #29
Section 1. Set Up Activity Sheets For each activity in the MS Project schedule
• If work package contains > 20 activities, break into multiple work packages
• Do not add additional activity sheets to the workbook
Enter estimated duration
Start and end dates will be entered by the project office at a later date
Estimate contingency according to the rules contained in the PEP
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #30
Contingency Refresher
Re-evaluate current work packages
Durations and cost in the work package• No contingency• Currently the duration in the Microsoft Project
Schedule is with contingency
With some exceptions, the contingency will decrease due to R&D advancements
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #31
Risk Factors
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #32
Risk Weights
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #33
Section 2. Estimate Labor Costs Specific Person
• Assign name, institution, labor type and hours
Generic resources in the Project schedule • Assign TBD, institution, labor type and hours
Graduate students, scientific staff and professors should not have a cost associated with them.• Capture their effort both here and in the
schedule for planning purposes.
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #34
Duration and Work Effort Comparison
I. EDM Activity Information
WBS Number:
360
8%
6%
4%
II. Labor ChargesBase Labor
Cost0.03 72 52.44 3,775.68 - - 0.03 72 55.94 4,027.68 - - Caltech CalTech Engineer
Name (Optional) Home Institution Labor Type or DisciplineFractional
TimeHours
Base Labor Rate
Org SupportFacility Cost
(LANL)
Weighted Cost Contingency:
Schedule Contingency: Schedule Contingency Weight: 1 Weighted Schedule Contingency:
Technical Contingency: Technical Contingency Weight: 2 Weighted Technical Contingency:
Cost Contingency: Cost Contingency Weight: 1
Caltech
Activity Title: F-Design Superconducting Shield Including Penetrations
Anticipated Start Date: Anticipated End Date:
Ray CortezBob Carr
Estimated Duration in Days:
CalTech Technician
VI. Assumptions, Constraints and Dependencies123456789
10
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #35
Section 3. Estimate Other Direct Costs (ODC)
Enter cost type, base estimate and purchasing institution.• travel, supplies and small equipment purchases
Check accuracy and completeness of your ODC estimate• make sure that you have included appropriate amounts
of ODC for each institution participating in the activityIII. Other Direct Costs (ODC)
Base Estimate Purchasing Institution
Loaded Total
ODC Base Total - -
ODC Type
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #36
Section 4. Estimate Major Procurements Estimate the burdened cost of all procurements over $25k
• Write a brief description of the item• Enter a base estimate (best guess until you have a quote)• Assign institution that will initiate the purchase
Institutions may have different overhead rates for small and large procurements. Be sure to enter procurement costs in the section with the appropriate overhead rate.
Submit vendor quotes labeled by WBS electronically to the project office for purchases greater than $25K or as requested by Project Office• Will provide reviewers with a better understanding of how cost
estimates on largest ticket items were determined• Some purchases might be grouped
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #37
Section 6. Assumptions Assumption - A condition or statement
assumed to be true for the purposes of planning that if proved false could significantly alter the project's ability to complete the activity as expected.• Example: you may assume that your institution
will assign a lower overhead to the project because of its scientific importance. If the institute eventually decides against offering the lower rate, the estimated cost of the activity could increase significantly.
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #38
Section 6. Constraints Constraint - A restriction or limitation that must be
met by the activity in order to satisfy project requirements. • Example: the EDM Project Manager may assign a
budget constraint to a particular piece of equipment in order to complete the project within DOE's funding profile.
• Example: an activity on the critical path may have to be started or finished on a certain date in order to meet a Critical Decision point or other high level milestone.
Use this section to document constraints that the project office needs to know
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #39
Section 6. Dependencies (Links) Dependency - A relation between activities,
such that one requires input from the other. • Example: completion of an activity may
require that another activity from outside of your WBS element be completed first.
• Document any dependencies of which you are aware in the activity sheets
• Refer to the master schedule to identify the logical relationships that have been defined to this point
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #40
Complete the Work Package Sheet Once you have finished a sheet for each
activity in the work package, the last step is to complete the work package. • Enter a work package title• WBS number at the Summary level• Max. 3-4 sentence description of the work
scope– The detail will go into the WBS Dictionary
• Milestones• Assumptions pertaining to the overall work
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #41
Milestones The following definitions from the planning
guidance apply to entering milestone levels:• Level 1 DOE
– Critical Decisions• Level 2 PEP Milestone
– 1 to 2 per Year• Level 3 Work Package
– 1 to 2 per Quarter• Level 4 Activity (Lowest Level)
– Your internal milestones to manage
DOEPO
NSF
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #42
Risk Need to rework contingency
Document risk
Contingency >30% needs to be documented on the work package section 6.
A risk log will be created from the WP documentation
The work packages and the schedule can easily show the amount with and without contingency
Schedule contingency dropped from 12 months to 8 months
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #43
High Contingency ActivitiesWBS Task Name Cont %
1.6.11.13 Test entire central detector system 78
1.5.6.4 Fabricate Dressed Spin Coils 74
1.6.7.3 Procure end cap 66
1.6.6.1.5 Procure Optics 64
1.3.2.3.4 Construction of the volume and dummy end cap for testing 60
1.6.8.2 Prototyping 60
1.6.8.4 Procure V1 valve 60
1.6.6.1.3 Prototyping 56
1.4.5.3 F-Design Purifier Concen Measure Eqpt 54
1.4.5.9 Procure Purifier Concen Measure Eqpt 54
1.4.8.2 F-Design Pressurizer Bellows 54
1.4.8.4 Procure Pressurizer Bellows 54
1.4.10.2.2 F-Design V1 Valve Actuators 54
1.4.10.2.4 Procure V1 Valve Actuators 54
1.5.4.5 Fabricate B0 Field and Gradient Field Coils 54
1.5.11.7 Cold Test of B0 Coil Package 54
1.6.2.1.3 Procure Capacitor 54
1.6.2.2.3 Procure Electrodes 54
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #44
High Contingency Continued1.6.2.3.3 Procure Connecting Line 54
1.6.2.4.3 Procure Penetrations 54
1.6.4.4 Procure Cells 54
1.6.4.5 Coatings 54
1.5.4.7 High Field B0 Test 52
1.5.6.6 Warm Test of Dressed Spin Coil 52
1.5.9.8 Test 3He Spin-Holding Coil at CIT 52
1.5.11.3 Warm Test of B0 Coil Package (Low Field) 52
1.5.1.5 Procure Conventional Shield and Support Structure 51
1.2.3.2 Procure Magnets 50
1.6.3.2 F-Design HV Monitor 50
1.2.2.2.1 P- Magnetic Field Design 48
1.2.2.2.2 F- Magnetic Field Design 48
1.3.3.5.3.3 Construction of refrigerator by vendor 48
1.4.3.10 Collection System Sensor Instrumentation 48
1.6.6.3.3 Prototyping base 48
1.5.3.4 Procure Ferromagnetic Shield 45
1.5.10.4 Procure Ferromagnetic Shield 45
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #45
Performance Baseline PO Effort (10/24) Change Log submitted from SSM effort
Work Breakdown Structure
WBS Dictionary
Work Packages
Contingency Analyses
Cost Books
Resource Loaded Schedule
Critical Path Schedule
Rework Schedule
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #46
Sample Change Log
Unique ID Describe Change
CHANGE LOG
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #47
Changes What has been added to the schedule
Use the change log to identify requested external links
Document deleted activities
Document new activities
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #48
Change Control “Who can do what and at what authority”
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #49
Sample Baseline Change LogDate
ApprovedBCP
Number Description BCP
Amount Contingency Remaining
Contingency
2/14/2007 Initial OPC Contingency Amount 60,000$ 60,000$
2/14/2007 Initial TEC Contingency Amount 221,000$ 281,000$
-$ 281,000$
7/23/2007 BCP00 Manufacture the tricoil vacuum can at MIT (20,000)$ -$ 261,000$
-$ 261,000$
not approved Identified pulled out. Will be corrected. 9,000$ 270,000$
11/1/2007 Corrected (9,000)$ 261,000$
-$ 261,000$
10/1/2007 FY08 Contingency TEC 799,000$ 1,060,000$
1/4/2008 FY08 Capital funds reduction (140,000)$ 920,000$
-$ 920,000$
BCP01 Correction for NMGRT (1,100)$ -$ 918,900$
BCP01 LHe for dual-use cryostat operations (38,900)$ -$ 880,000$
BCP01 Dual-use cryostat construction (261,800)$ -$ 618,200$
BCP01 3He relaxation, geometric phase studies at NCSU (50,000)$ -$ 568,200$
BCP01 HV studies at Indiana University (8,000)$ -$ 560,200$
BCP01 NMGRT on NCSU ans Indiana contracts (3,200)$ -$ 557,000$
5/14/2008 Current Balance 940,000$ 557,000$
Office of Nuclear Physics
Annual Review 8/1/07 #50
What The Project Office Needs New Rate Table in FY08 dollars
New/Revised WBS
Microsoft Project with Internal Logic
WBS Dictionary
New/Revised Work Packages
Change log
Cost backup documentation