+ All Categories
Transcript
Page 1: Nisha Ranganathan, Rebecca Johnson, Andrew M. Edwardsevent.federationinfectionsocieties.com/wp-content/... · 2017. 12. 18. · Nisha Ranganathan, Rebecca Johnson, Andrew M. Edwards

Staphylococcal bacteraemia: finding the path of least persistence NishaRanganathan,RebeccaJohnson,AndrewM.Edwards

Background•  DespitethefallingincidenceofMRSAbacteraemia,therateofMSSAbacteraemiaisrising1

•  Inasignificantpropor@onofcases,bacteraemiapersistsdespiteappropriatetherapy2

•  Challengestotreatmentariseasunderthetwinthreatsofan@bio@csandtheimmune

system,bacteriabecomedormant,metabolicallyinac@veandarethusan@bio@ctolerant3

•  TheregulatorofthestressresponseinS.aureus,SigB,regulatesentryintodormancy4

Thehostenvironmentmodulatesan7bio7c

suscep7bility

A B

C

Figure2.(A)Titra7ngconcentra7onofAHTinthecomplementedsigBmutantresultedinincreasingsigB expression, as evidencedby increase inpigmentproduc7onand (B)fibronec7nbinding (bothsigBdependentphenotypes). (C)IncreasingsurvivalofS.aureusinbloodonincreasinginduc7onofsigBexpressionwithAHTincomplementedmutantbutnotinemptyplasmidvector.

Figure1.Bloodmodulatesan7bio7csuscep7bilityofS.aureusonexposuretoCloxacillin(A)Gentamicin(B),Vancomycin(C),Ciprofloxacin(D)Clindamycin(E).Withtheexcep7onof(B)theaddi7onofan7bio7cfailedtosignificantlyenhancekillingcomparedtobloodalone,howeveran7bio7csfunc7onedinserum.

A

SigBmodulatesan7bio7csuscep7bilityinthehostcontext

Figure 4. (A) sigB effectors SA2440 and SA2452 promote survival in blood infec7onmodel.IncreasingexpressionofSA2452butnotSA2440increasessurvival inbloodalone(A)andinbloodplus cloxacillin (B) inadosedependentmanner. Increasingexpressionofbothgenesincreasessurvivalonexposuretociprofloxacin(C).SA2440butnotSA2452promotessurvivalonexposuretogentamicin(D).

Conclusions•  Bloodappearstohaveaninhibitoryeffectontheac@vityofcertainan@bio@cs.

•  SigBpromotessurvivalinbothbloodaloneplusincombina@onwithcloxacillin,ciprofloxacinandgentamicin.

•  TwoSigBregulatedgeneshavebeeniden@fiedthatpromotesurvivalinanan@bio@cspecificmanner.

•  Rethinkingtherapyinthecontextofthehost-pathogen-druginterac@onsmayleadtoinnova@vesolu@onstoenhanceexis@ngtreatmentstrategies.

References1.  HealthProtec@onAgency.VoluntaryRepor2ngofStaphylococcusaureusBacteraemiainEngland,WalesandNorthernIreland,2010.London:HealthProtec@onAgency,20112.  Kha@bR,etal.2006.PersistenceinStaphylococcusaureusbacteremia:incidence,characteris@[email protected]:7–143.  KLewisMul@drugtoleranceofbiofilmsandpersistercellsCurrTopMicrobiolImmunol,322(2008),pp.107–131BischoffM,DunmanP,KormanecJ,MacapagalD,MurphyE,MountsW,Berger-BachiB,ProjanS.2004.Microarray-basedanalysisoftheStaphylococcusaureusσBregulon.JBacteriol186:4085–4099.

AcknowledgementsMembersofthefi`hflooroftheCentreforMolecularBacteriologyandInfec@onatImperialCollegeLondon,andtheEdwardsgroupinpar@cular,areacknlowedgedfortheir invaluable support. This work is funded by the MRC as part of a clinicalresearchtrainingfellowship

SigBpromotessurvivalinblood

010100010100AHT

WTΔsigB

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigBpEmpty

ΔsigBpEmpty

ΔsigBpsigB

ΔsigBpsigB

ΔsigBpsigB

0

10

20

30

40

50

% S

urviv

al

010100010100AHT

WTΔsigB

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

gentamicin

% S

urvi

val

WTΔsigB

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

0

2

4

6

8cloxacillin

% S

urvi

val

WTΔsigB

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

0

2

4

6

8

10

ciprofloxacin

% S

urvi

val

WT

ΔsigB

ΔsigBpEmpty

ΔsigBpEmpty

ΔsigBpEmpty

ΔsigBpsigB

ΔsigBpsigB

ΔsigBpsigB

0

100

200

300

clindamycin

% S

urv

ival

BloodSerum

WTΔsigB

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

pEmpty

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

ΔsigB

psigB

0

50

100

150

vancomycin

% S

urvi

val

SigBregulatedgenesmodulatesurvivalinblood+/-

an7bio7cs

D

WTΔsigBp2440p24

40p2440

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmptyp2452p2452p2452

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

0

5

10

15Blood Alone

% S

urvi

val

WTΔsigBp2440p2440p2440

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmptyp2452p2452p2452

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

0

5

10

15

20

25

% S

urvi

val

Blood + Cloxacillin

WTΔsigBp2440p2440p2440

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmptyp2452p2452p2452

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

0

2

4

6

% S

urvi

val

Blood + Ciprofloxacin

WTΔsigBp2440p2440p2440

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmpty

2440

pEmptyp2452p2452p2452

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

2452

pEmpty

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

% S

urvi

val

Blood + Gentamicin

B

DC

A

E

cB

0 2 4 610

100

1000

Cloxacillin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

0 2 4 61

10

100

1000

Cloxacillin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

0 2 4 61

10

100

1000

Cloxacillin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

0 2 4 61

10

100

1000

Cloxacillin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

0 2 4 60.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

Gentamicin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

0 2 4 61

10

100

1000

Vancomycin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

MJ blood+ vancMJ Blood

0 2 4 60.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

Ciprofloxacin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

0 2 4 610

100

1000

Clindamycin

Time (h)

% S

urvi

val

B

Figure3.IncreasingsigBexpressionincreasessurvivalofS.aureusinbloodpluscloxacillinciprofloxacinandgentamicin(A,B,C)butnotonexposuretobloodplusvancomycinorclindamycin(D,E).

A

•  Aim:TocharacterisetheroleofSigBanditseffectormoleculesinthesurvivalofS.aureusinaclinicalbacteraemiamodelLewisetal3

C D E

Top Related