Notice & Agenda
Swift County Board of Commissioners
Tuesday, September 1, 2015 9:00 AM
Swift County Board Room – 301 14th
St N, Benson, MN
If you need any type of accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact the County Administrator at 320-314-
8399 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Times are only estimates and items may be taken out of order.
Time Reference Item
9:00 a.m. Call to Order and Roll Call
9:01 a.m. Approve Agenda
9:03 a.m. Consent Agenda
1-2 (1) Minutes from the August 18, 2015 Meeting
3-5 (2) Consider approving a resolution setting a wheelage tax in 2016
for transportation improvements in Swift County
9:04 a.m. Consider Approval of Commissioner warrants and review Auditor
warrants reviewed 9:05 a.m. Commissioner and Board reports
9:20 a.m. Citizens Comments
9:20 a.m. Presentation from Maggie Boese on the Safe Communities Coalition
9:30 a.m. Sen. Lyle Koenen and Rep. Tim Miller, Legislative Update
10:00 a.m. Update from Rick Lee, CEO of Woodland Centers
10:15 a.m. Kim Saterbak, County Auditor
6-9 Consider accepting a bid for tax-forfeited property in the City of Appleton
Parcels #22-0291-000, & #22-0297-100 from Bill and Ann Hanson
10:25 a.m. Mike Pogge-Weaver, County Administrator
10 2016 Preliminary Budget Presentation
County Administrator Report
Other Business
11-17 Consider approving a MOU between AFSCME Local #2538 – Human
Services Unit and Swift County on implementing the Classification and
Compensation Study
None Strategic Plan Update
11:15 a.m. Adjournment
SWIFT COUNTY BOARD MINUTES
August 18, 2015 Chairman Peter Peterson called the meeting to order at 11:00 AM with all present. Also in attendance were
County Administrator Mike Pogge-Weaver and Mary Fischer from Southern Prairie Community Care.
Chairman Peter Peterson asked if there were any changes to the agenda. There were none.
08-18-15-01 Commissioner Hendrickx moved and Commissioner Edward Pederson seconded to approve
the agenda as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
08-18-15-02 Commissioner Fox moved and Commissioner Rudningen seconded to approve the Consent
Agenda which consisted of: (1) Minutes from the August 4, 2015 Regular Meeting, (2) Approval of the
2015 Emergency Management Performance Grant, (3) Approval of increasing credit card purchasing limits
for certain employees, (4) Approval of an application from Northern Lights Trails for an exempt permit to
conduct lawful gambling in Swift Falls, and (5) Appointment of Eddie Massey to the Revolving Loan Fund
Advisory Board. Motion carried unanimously.
08-18-15-03 Commissioner Fox moved and Commissioner Rudningen seconded to approve the
Commissioner warrants as follows: Revenue: $66,505.45; Solid Waste: $29,835.77; Road and Bridge:
$370,532.82; County Ditches: $1416.33; and County Health Insurance: $424.00 which includes the
following bills over $2,000: Anoka County Human Services, $2,375.00; Boyer Trucks, Inc., $3,834.42;
Braun Intertec Corp, $14,141.16; Computer Professionals Unlimited Inc., $5,238.24; Duininck Inc.,
$260,679.06; Johnson Controls, $2,773.00; MN Counties Intergovernmental Trust, $3,555.85; Pflipsen
Trucking LLC, $14,457.65; Riley Brothers Companies, $84,680.34; Soil Conservation Office, $25,000.00;
and Waste Management of Northern Minnesota, $10,240.10. Motion carried unanimously.
Board and Committee Reports were given as follows: Chairman Pete Peterson reported on a meeting on the
Prairie Correctional Facility and Countryside Public Health. Commissioner Fox reported on the MCIT
Training, Pitch with the Commissioner of Health, Restorative Practices, Woodland Centers, Pomme de
Terre River Watershed, and Well-Being Committee. Commissioner Edward Pederson reported on the
MCIT Training and Soil and Water Conservation. Commissioner Rudningen reported on the MCIT
Training, Well-being Committee, SCEMO, and RASP. Commissioner Hendrickx reported on Corrections,
Woodland Centers, the meeting on the Prairie Correctional Facility, and AMC.
Administrator Pogge-Weaver updated the board on the CCA discussions, the CPA Taskforce, the
September 1st meeting with our legislators, the feasibility study on developing a regional broadband
network, and the budget.
Chairman Peterson asked for citizen’s comments. There were none.
Southern Prairie Community Care Executive Director Mary Fischer and Medical Director Norris Anderson
gave an update to the board.
Swift County Soil and Water Conservation District Chairman Dale Schlieman and Office Manager Sheri
Gades gave an update to the board.
The board recessed for lunch at 12:04 PM and reconvened at 1:00 PM.
Southwest Initiative Foundation Program Officer Cheryl Glaeser gave an update to the board.
1
Attorney Kurt Deter updated the board on the new buffer strip requirements.
Veteran Services Officer Dave Barrett presented the board with the VSO Annual Report.
VSO Barrett further requested the board approve applying for the 2016 Enhancement Grant.
08-18-15-04 Commissioner Hendrickx moved and Commissioner Rudningen seconded to approve applying
for the grant. Motion carried unanimously.
Pioneerland Library System Librarians Cindy Hendrickx, Vicki Bartz, and Dawn Erickson gave an update
to the board.
Environmental Services Director Scott Collins requested approval of Conditional Use Permit #4997 for
Dennis Smith (owner) for expansion of a feedlot from 475 animal units to 950 animal units of beef finish
cattle and constructing a new 200’ by 120’ total confinement mono-slope shed located in the NW ¼ of
Section 27 in Moyer Township.
08-18-15-05 Commissioner Rudningen moved and Commissioner Hendrickx seconded to approve CUP
#4997. Motion carried unanimously.
Administrator Pogge-Weaver presented the board with a resolution in support of a broadband grant
application and committing to financially backing the project subject to specific terms.
08-18-15-06 Commissioner Rudningen moved and Commissioner Fox seconded to approve a resolution
supporting Federated Telephone Cooperative’s Border to Border Broadband Development Grant and
commit to financially backing the project subject to certain terms and final legal review. Motion carried
4-1 with Commissioner Edward Pederson opposing.
Administrator Pogge-Weaver presented the board with the preliminary 2016 budget requests and a
discussion was held.
Chairman Peter Peterson adjourned the meeting at 3:03 PM.
WITNESSED:
_____________________________
Peter Peterson, Chair
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Michel Pogge-Weaver, Clerk of the Board
2
Request for Board Action BOARD MEETING DATE:
Commissioner's Report September 1, 2015
Department Information
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE:
Administration Mike Pogge-Weaver 320-314-8399
Agenda Item Details
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST:
Consider approving a resolution setting a wheelage tax in 2016 for transportation improvements in Swift County AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT?
Consent Agenda No IS THIS MANDATED? EXPLANATION OF MANDATE:
No n/a BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION:
At the May 5th meeting, the Board discussed and voted to extend the $10.00 wheelage tax for an additional year for 2016. Attached is the formal resolution that the Board needs to approve formalizing that action. PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED? Discussed at the May 6th meeting
Budget Information
FUNDING: The wheelage tax is used to support transportation infrastructure in Swift County.
Review/Recommendation
COUNTY ATTORNEY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Danielle Olson Mike Pogge-Weaver RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS:
Was not submitted for review Approve COMMENTS: COMMENTS:
None None
3
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
SWIFT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A WHEELAGE TAX
Motion by Commissioner ______________ Seconded by Commissioner ______________
WHEREAS, Swift County's transportation infrastructure forms the backbone of the
county's economy and has a direct impact on future economic development; and
WHEREAS, funding for highway and bridge systems in Minnesota has remained stagnant
and is failing to keep pace with growing population and growing population and growing demands
including increased freight shipments; and
WHEREAS, local governments throughout the state are challenged with maintaining local
transportation systems while state funding has not kept up with the needs on the State Aid system;
and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Legislature’s 2013 Transportation Appropriation Bill
(Chapter 117, Article 3, Section 4) included expansion of authority for all 87 Minnesota counties
to impose a wheelage tax at a $10.00 per vehicle rate to provide additional revenue for highways
and bridges; and
WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. 163.051 further provides that the board may provide by
resolution for collection of the wheelage tax by county officials or it may request that the tax be
collected by the state registrar of motor vehicles, and the state registrar of motor vehicles shall
collect such tax on behalf of the county if requested; and
WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. 163.051, Subd. 4, provides that the treasurer of each county
receiving proceeds from the wheelage tax is to deposit such proceeds in the county road and bridge
fund, which moneys shall be used for purposes authorized by law which are highway purposes
within the meaning of the Minnesota Constitution, Article 14; and
WHEREAS, The Swift County Board desires to implement such a wheelage tax and have
the state registrar of motor vehicles collect the tax to help improve the quality of the county road
system, prolong the useful life of county roads and provide a smoother driving surface and a safer
highway system.
4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Swift County Board of
Commissioners authorize and impose a wheelage tax as provided for in Minn. Stat. 163.051(2013
Regular Session Law, Chapter 117, Article 3, Section 4) of $10.00 for the year 2015, subject to
levy limits and other factors, on each motor vehicle which is
kept in Swift County when not in operation and which is subject to taxation and registration under
Chapter 168.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the county requests the state registrar of motor
vehicles to collect the wheelage tax on behalf of the county.
Adopted on a ____________ vote by the Swift County Board of County Commissioners the
20th day of May, 2014.
Swift County Board of Commissioners
__________________________________
Joe Fox, Chairman
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Michel J. Pogge-Weaver
County Administrator and Clerk of the Board
I, Michel J. Pogge-Weaver, Clerk of the County Board in and for the County of Swift,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Board of County Commissioners on the 20th day of May, 2014.
_________________________________
Michel J. Pogge-Weaver
Clerk of the County Board
I, Kim Saterbak, Swift County Auditor in and for the County of Swift, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners on the 20th day of May, 2014.
_________________________________
Kim Saterbak
Swift County Auditor
5
Request for Board Action BOARD MEETING DATE:
Commissioner's Report September 1, 2015
Department Information
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE:
Auditor Kim Saterbak 320-843-6108
Agenda Item Details
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST:
Consider accepting a bid for tax-forfeited property in the City of Appleton Parcels #22-0291-000, & #22-0297-100 from Bill and Ann Hanson AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT?
10:15 No IS THIS MANDATED? EXPLANATION OF MANDATE:
Yes Submitted bid for a Tax-Forfeited Property must be approved by the Board of Commissioners
BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION:
Parcels #22-0291-000, & #22-0297-100 were tax-forfeited to the State of Minnesota for lack of property tax payment. A bid on these properties have been submitted by Bill and Ann Hanson. I attached detailed information on each of these parcels, in addition to the submitted bid letter. For the purchase of Parcels #22-0291-000 and 22-00297-100, they are offering a bid of $200.00 with the intention of building a single family home with a value greater than $50,000 within the next 3 to 5 years on these parcels. PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED?
Budget Information
FUNDING: n/a
Review/Recommendation
COUNTY ATTORNEY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Danielle Olson Mike Pogge-Weaver RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS:
Was not submitted for review Review and consider taking an action COMMENTS: COMMENTS:
None None
6
7
Hanson Lot Request
03/26/2015 8
Just a little history on these parcels…..
Parcel #22-0291-000
Forfeited in 2002
Annual tax amount in 2001 of $54.00
Request to purchase made by Vincent Hughes on April 20, 2015 for $250.00 (includes parcel
#22-0297-100)
Special Assessments of $2,700 – mainly comprised of Appleton utility charges. (Special
assessments are “written off” at tax forfeiture, but we have typically tried to get enough to pay
back the municipality, but this is not required).
Parcel #22-0297-100
Forfeited in 2011
Annual tax amount in 2010 of $28.00
Request to purchase made by Vincent Hughes on April 20, 2015 for $250.00 (includes parcel
#22-0291-000)
No Special Assessments
9
Request for Board Action BOARD MEETING DATE:
Commissioner's Report September 1, 2015
Department Information
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE:
Administration Mike Pogge-Weaver 320-314-8399
Agenda Item Details
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST:
Presentation, review, and discussion of Swift County’s Preliminary 2016 Budget and Levy AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT?
Other Business No IS THIS MANDATED? EXPLANATION OF MANDATE:
Yes The County Board is required to approve preliminary levies and budgets prior to September 30. They are also required to set the TNT meeting by September 30.
BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION:
The full budget and supporting document on the preliminary 2016 Budget and Levy is included in the supplemental material. The board is asked to review and discuss the proposed preliminary budget and levy. Action will be requested to be taken at the Board’s September 15th meeting. PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED? None
Budget Information
FUNDING: n/a
Review/Recommendation
COUNTY ATTORNEY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Danielle Olson Mike Pogge-Weaver RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS:
Did not review Review and discuss COMMENTS: COMMENTS:
n/a None
10
Request for Board Action BOARD MEETING DATE:
Commissioner's Report September 1, 2015
Department Information
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT: REQUESTOR: REQUESTOR PHONE:
Administration Mike Pogge-Weaver 320-314-8399
Agenda Item Details
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF YOUR REQUEST:
Consider approving a MOU between AFSCME Local #2538 – Human Services Unit and Swift County on implementing the Classification and Compensation Study AGENDA YOU ARE REQUESTING TIME ON: ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT?
Other Business No IS THIS MANDATED? EXPLANATION OF MANDATE:
No BACKGROUND/JUSTIFICATION:
The County has been working on implementing a new Classification and Compensation Study that was completed last summer. This is the fourth of five employee groups that will be moving forward with implementation of the new Classification and Compensation Study. The only group to not move is the between AFSCME Local #2538 – Highway and Environmental Services Unit. PREVIOUS ACTION ON REQUEST / OTHER PARTIES INVOLVED?
This agreement has been ratified by the full union group.
Budget Information
FUNDING: The approximate cost to the County to proceed with implementation with this group (AFSCME – Human Services Unit) over the contracts that are currently in place is $29,000 for 2015 and $66,000 for 2016.
Review/Recommendation
COUNTY ATTORNEY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR: Danielle Olson Mike Pogge-Weaver RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDATIONS:
Reviewed by the County’s labor attorney and found to be acceptable to form.
Approve
COMMENTS: COMMENTS:
n/a None
11
RESOLUTION
APPROVING A MOU WITH AFSCME LOCAL #2538 – HUMAN SERVICES UNIT
RELATED TO IMPLEMENTING THE CLASSIFICATION AND
COMPENSATION STUDY
Motion by Commissioner ______________ Seconded by Commissioner ______________
BE IT RESOLVED, that the MOU between Swift County and AFSCME Local #2538 – Human
Services Unit related to implementing the classification and compensation study and on file in
the office of the Clerk of the Board is approved and the Board Chair and Clerk of the Board are
hereby authorized to sign the same on behalf of Swift County.
Adopted on a ____________ vote by the Swift County Board of County Commissioners
the 1st day of September 2015.
Swift County Board of Commissioners
__________________________________
Peter Peterson, Chair
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
Michel J. Pogge-Weaver
County Administrator and Clerk of the Board
Fox __ Hendrickx __ E. Pederson __
P. Peterson __ Rudningen __
12
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
Between
Swift County
and
AFSCME Council 65, Local #2538, Swift County Human Services Unit
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) concerns the implementation of a new
classification and compensation study that Swift County recently completed. This MOU is made
and entered into this 1st day of September, 2015; by and between Swift County (hereinafter
"Employer") and AFSCME Council 65, Local #2538, Swift County Human Services Unit
(hereinafter "Union").
The Employer and the Union agree to the following amendments to the Master Agreement
between the County of Swift and AFSCME Council 65, Local #2538, Swift County Human
Services Unit – January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2016 (hereinafter “Master Agreement”):
On January 1, 2015, employees shall progress on the current “Appendix A –
Classification” in the Master Agreement as they would have prior to this MOU.
On January 1, 2015, the attached “Appendix A.1 – Classification” shall be added to the
Master Agreement.
Related to step increases on anniversary dates starting on January 1, 2015 and for annual
wage adjustments starting on January 1, 2016 “ARTICLE IX. SENIORITY AND
RETIREMENT” shall be revised in the Master Agreement as follows:
ARTICLE IX. SENIORITY AND RETIREMENT
Section 6. Step salary increases shall be granted on an employee’s anniversary date to their
current position and as long as an employee is achieving a satisfactory
performance evaluation. A step increase shall be effective for work performed on
and after the employee’s anniversary date to their current position. Denial of a
salary increase due to work performance issues requires a special performance
evaluation to be completed at least sixty (60) days prior to the employee’s
anniversary date. A copy of the special performance evaluation denying a step
increase shall be provided to the Union representative at least fourth-five (45)
days prior to the employee’s anniversary date.
The employer shall complete a supplemental performance review within six (6)
months of an unsatisfactory performance evaluation in which a salary increase
was withheld. If the employee received a satisfactory performance evaluation on
the supplemental performance evaluation then the employee shall receive the
13
salary increase they would have otherwise been entitle to effective the date of the
supplemental performance review.
If a performance review results in the denial of a step increase, that performance
review shall be grievable by the employee.
Employees will be evaluated by their immediate supervisor as outlined in the
County's Personnel Policies. Appeals of a review shall follow the County
Personnel Policy.
Section 7.
General wage adjustments to the pay plan shall be effective for work performed
on and after the effective date.
Employees shall transition from Appendix A to Appendix A.1 using the following
method:
o Unless an exception is otherwise noted in this MOU, on an employee’s first
anniversary date after 1/1/2015, the employee shall receive any step increases on
Appendix A and longevity pay to determine their hourly wage. Using this hourly
wage, the employee shall then be placed on the wage table in Appendix A.1 using
the following method:
If the hourly wage equals a step on the new wage scale then the employee
moves to that step on the new wage scale.
If the hourly wage falls between two steps then the employee shall receive
the higher of the two steps.
o The following are the exception to how social workers will be transition to the
new wage table in Appendix A.1:
For social workers hired in 2011-2013, they will be placed on the new pay
plan one step higher than outlined above. This is to avoid having
individuals that start in 2014 and 2015 being paid more than current
employees.
For social workers hired in 2014 they will be placed on step 0 on July 1,
2015, then moved to step 1 on 1/1/2016, and then see a step annually after
that on 1/1 of each year.
For social workers hired in 2015 hires they will be placed on step -1 on
July 1, 2015, then move to step 0 on 1/1/2016, then move to step 1 on
7/1/2016, and then receive a step annually after that on 7/1 of each year.
Step -1 shall be eliminated as of 1/1/2016.
For social workers hired in 2016 hires they will start on step 0, then move
to step 1 on 1/1/2017, and then receive a step annually after that on 1/1 of
each year.
Step 0 shall be eliminated on 1/1/2017.
14
For new social workers hired on and after 1/1/2017 they will start on step
1 and receive step increases on their anniversary dates.
Social workers who started on or prior to March 5, 1998 shall all be
moved to the new pay plan together effective April 25, 2015 and be placed
on Step 9 for their position as listed on “Appendix A.1 – Classification”
on April 25, 2015. For these social workers, they shall be placed on Step
10 on April 25, 2016 subject to all other terms of this MOU.
o Longevity pay shall be discontinued once an employee is moved to the new pay
plan.
o The current incumbent to the Support & Collections Specialist position shall remain
on the old Appendix A and longevity included in the current master agreement
until such time a new master agreement is mutually agreed to by both parties. The
effect of deleting Article XIII – Longevity and Appendix A shall not impact this
employee during the term of this MOU.
o For the Eligibility Worker position, new hires starting on or after January 1, 2015
will be placed on Step Ø through December 31, 2015. Step Ø shall be eliminated
from the pay plan on December 31, 2016.
o Individuals in the position of Case Aide/Family Support and Educator; Eligibility
Worker; or Information Systems Specialist, Sr. and are at the 12th yr step on
“Appendix A. Wage Table” prior to the implementation of this MOU shall all be
moved to the new pay plan together effective May 21, 2015 and be placed on Step
10 for their position as listed on “Appendix A.1 – Classification” on May 21,
2015.
“Article XIII. Longevity” in the Master Agreement shall be deleted as of January 1, 2016.
“Appendix A – Classification” shall be deleted as of January 1, 2016.
Effective with the signing of this MOU, the following language shall be revised in the
Master Agreement as follows:
Article VII Health, Welfare, and Expenses
Section 6.
2. Meal Expense Reimbursement.
Meal reimbursement, for expenses incurred outside of Swift County, is
allowed at the following maximum rates: Breakfast - $10.00; Noon -
$12.00; and Evening meal - $18.00. For county related travel exceeding 24
hours meals may be aggregated up to $40.00 per day. Employees may
purchase groceries in lieu of restaurant meals; reimbursement will follow
15
the meal reimbursement schedule. Meal gratuity and alcoholic beverages
are not reimbursable expenses.
This Memorandum of Understanding is effective once signed by the two parties and shall run
through the end of the current 2014-2016 Master Agreement unless amended by mutual
agreement of both parties.
For the Employer: For the Union:
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________ _____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
16
APPENDIX A.1 – CLASSIFICATION
January 1, 2015 Wage Table Hourly Rate
Title Grade -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Office Support Specialist 6 13.65 14.06 14.47 14.92 15.36 15.83 16.29 16.78 17.29 17.81
Account Technician I 8 15.33 15.79 16.27 16.76 17.26 17.78 18.31 18.86 19.42 20.01
Case Aide/Family Support and Educator 10 17.23 17.75 18.28 18.83 19.39 19.98 20.57 21.19 21.83 22.48
Eligibility Worker 10 16.71 17.23 17.75 18.28 18.83 19.39 19.98 20.57 21.19 21.83 22.48
Information Systems Specialist, Sr. 10 17.23 17.75 18.28 18.83 19.39 19.98 20.57 21.19 21.83 22.48
Child Support Officer 11 18.26 18.81 19.37 19.96 20.55 21.18 21.81 22.46 23.14 23.83
Support and Collections Specialist 12 19.36 19.95 20.53 21.16 21.79 22.44 23.12 23.81 24.52 25.26
Lead Eligibility Worker 12 19.36 19.95 20.53 21.16 21.79 22.44 23.12 23.81 24.52 25.26
Social Worker 14 20.46 21.10 21.75 22.40 23.08 23.77 24.48 25.22 25.97 26.75 27.55 28.38
January 1, 2016 Wage Table Hourly Rate
Title Grade -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Office Support Specialist 6 13.85 14.27 14.69 15.14 15.59 16.07 16.53 17.03 17.55 18.08
Account Technician I 8 15.56 16.03 16.51 17.01 17.52 18.05 18.58 19.14 19.71 20.31
Case Aide/Family Support and Educator 10 17.49 18.02 18.55 19.11 19.68 20.28 20.88 21.51 22.16 22.82
Eligibility Worker 10 16.97 17.49 18.02 18.55 19.11 19.68 20.28 20.88 21.51 22.16 22.82
Information Systems Specialist, Sr. 10 17.49 18.02 18.55 19.11 19.68 20.28 20.88 21.51 22.16 22.82
Child Support Officer 11 18.53 19.09 19.66 20.26 20.86 21.50 22.14 22.80 23.49 24.19
Support and Collections Specialist 12 19.65 20.25 20.84 21.48 22.12 22.78 23.47 24.17 24.89 25.64
Lead Eligibility Worker 12 19.65 20.25 20.84 21.48 22.12 22.78 23.47 24.17 24.89 25.64
Social Worker 14 20.78 21.42 22.08 22.74 23.43 24.13 24.85 25.60 26.36 27.15 27.96 28.81
17