NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OCTOBER 8, 1992
8:30 A.M.
CLARK COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS
225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89155
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT:
VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGER
301 EAST CLARK AVENUE, SUITE 301
LAS VEGAS NEVADA 89101
455-31 39
POSTED: OCTOBER 2, 1992
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS 2200 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE NORTH LAS VEGAS, NV 89030
CLARK COUNTY BRIDGER BUILDING 225 EAST BRIDGER AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NV a9155
CITY OF LAS VEGAS CITY HALL 400 EAST STEWART LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 301 EAST CLARK, SUITE 301 LAS VEGAS, NV 89101
.................. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.* .*.-.-.-.*.*.*.-.- .-.-.-.*.-*-.-.*.-
......... ......... w-1 ......... .........
n
AGENDA
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OCTOBER 8, 1992
I. CALL TO ORDER AND MINUTES
1) ACTION TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA
2) ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1992
I I . PLANNING
3) DISCUSSION AND ACTION TO APPROVE A REVISION TO THE ADOPTED STREAM PRIORITIES FOR FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES (FIS)
111. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
4) ACTION TO APPROVE A RECOMMENDATION FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR AWARD OF BID FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS AT PECOS ROAD, SANDHILL ROAD AND MOUNTAIN VISTA STREET
5) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS FOR CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO. 4 FOR THE ANGEL PARK OUTLET AND OUTFALL
6) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF HENDERSON FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CHANNEL
7 ) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 FOR THE GOWAN DETENTION BASIN OUTFALL PROJECT, SCHEDULE "B" (STIMSON CHANNEL)
RFCD Board Agenda
IV. ADMINISTRATION
Page 2 October 8, 1992
RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT ON THE FLOOD AWARENESS PROGRAM
RECEIVE A STATUS REPORT FROM THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMllTEE ON 1992 ACTIVITIES
ACTION TO ACCEPT THE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS
ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL REPORTS
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION No action can be taken on any matter discussed under this item, although the Board can direct that it be placed on a future agenda
MINUTES CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
MEETING NOTICES:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS EXCUSED:
STAFF:
INTERESTED PARTIES:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS SEPTEMBER 10, 1992
Public Notices of the meeting were posted September 3, 1992, by Jon Downer of the Regional Flood Control District in the following locations: Las Vegas City Hall, North Las Vegas City Hall, Clark County Bridger Building, and the Clark County Regional Flood Control District offices.
Public Notices of the meeting were also mailed on September 3, 1992 to the cities of Boulder City, Henderson, Laughlin, and Mesquite for posting on community notice boards.
Michael R. Harris, Chairman, City of Henderson Iris Bletsch, City of Boulder City Bruce Woodbury, Clark County Jan Laverty Jones, City of Las Vegas Scott Higginson, City of Las Vegas Tom R. Leavitt, City of Mesquite Theron Goynes, City of North Las Vegas
Thalia Dondero, Vice-chairman, Clark County
Virginia Valentine, General Manager Gale Wm. Fraser I\, Assistant General Manager Deanna Lefko, Management Analyst I Chris Figgins, Deputy District Attorney Dennis Johnson, Manager, Business & Finance Catherine Razor, Project Administration Coordinator Chrisell Anderson-Jones, Word Processor
Bill Brandt, Clark County Public Works Denis Cederburg, Clark County Public Works
Board Minutes September 10,. 1992 Page 2
1. CALL TO ORDER AND MINUTES
1) ACTION TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND TO APPROVE THE AGENDA
The meeting was called to order at 8:34 a.m.
Commissioner Woodbury moved to approve the agenda. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 6 AYES - 0 NAYS
2) ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF AUGUST 13. 1992
Commissioner Woodbury moved to approve the minutes. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 6 AYES - 0 NAYS
II. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
3) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR CHANGE DRDER NO. 2 FOR THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL
Ms. Valentine stated that Clark County submitted a request to final out the actual quantities and that staff recommends approval.
Commission Woodbury moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 6 AYES - 0 NAYS
4) VAN.BUSKlRK CHANNEL
4A) ACTION TO ACCEPT A PRESENTATION BY CLARK COUNTY FOR THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS - DETENTION BASIN SITE "C"
Board Minutes September 10, 1992 Page 3
Bill Brandt, Senior Engineer, Clark County Public Works, assisted by Denis Cederburg, made the presentation to the Board. Chairman Harris asked if the right-of-way was in place for this phase of the project. Mr. Brandt stated that it was.
4B) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS - DETENTION BASIN SITE "C"
Ms. Valentine stated that staff recommends approval of the interlocal contract.
Commissioner Woodbury moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 6 AYES - 0 NAYS
5) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE
DRIVE TO THE GOWAN SOUTH DETENTION BASIN INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR DESIGN OF THE CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO
Ms. Valentine stated that this request for $67,000 applies to the design and right-of- way engineering to connect the existing Cheyenne Avenue Channel to the Gowan South Detention Basin and that staff recommends approval.
Commissioner Woodbury moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 6 AYES - 0 NAYS
6) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN- THE SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR THE HEMENWAY VALLEY WASH IMPROVEMENTS
Ms. Valentine stated that Boulder City had requested an increase of $1 60,000 to cover construction contract administration and addition of the gabions which were previously change-ordered out but are still required. The staff recommended approval.
Councilman Bletsch moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 6 AYES - 0 NAYS
Board Minutes September 10, 1992 Page 4
(Mayor Jones arrived at 8:40 a.m.)
a
7 ) ACTION TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE SECOND SUPPLEMFNTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE GOWAN DETENTION SYSTEM
Ms. Valentine said the City of Las Vegas submitted a request to use $30,000 already encumbered under the existing Interlocal Contract to provide busing for students around the construction area of the Gowan Detention Basin. The District Attorney has reviewed the Second Supplemental Interlocal Contract. Staff recommended approval of the amendment to the Interlocal.
Councilman Higginson moved for approval.
Councilman Bletsch stated that the School District had provided busing in this area last year; however, since they could not provide that service this year, it was important for the Regional Flood Control District to protect the children from the construction area. She noted that the citizens in the area should realize that when construction was completed, the District would no longer be responsible for funding the busing. Councilman Higginson stated that the residents are aware that the additional busing routes are temporary and they are working with the School Board Officials. He added that he appreciated the Board’s support in providing safety to the school children.
There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
8) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR THE LAS VEGAS WASH
Ms. Valentine stated that the project is completed and this is the final change order. Staff recommended approval.
Councilman Goynes moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
9) ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM CLARK COUNTY FOR A VARIANCE FROM THE UNIFORM REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL OF DRAINAGE -
Board Minutes September 10, 1992 Page 5
ELEVATION REQUIREMENT AT 3699 CATAt ,INA. LAUGHLIN, NEVADA
Councilman Bletsch moved for approval.
Ms. Valentine commented that as a condition of approval to the variance request, the property owner must execute a release and waiver to indemnify the District and the County prior to the issuance of any building permits.
Chairman Harris asked if the condition was included in the negotiations. Ms. Valentine confirmed that it had been.
There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
111. ADMINISTRATION
io ) REVIEW/DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL - 1992
Ms. Valentine stated that the proposed amendment outlined the District’s policy for requiring quarterly reports on maintenance activities. She further explained that the existing section of the Policies and Procedures Manual covering reporting requirements had been expanded to include the due dates, and verbiage which would clarify the District‘s policy.
Chairman Harris requested confirmation that all entities were in concurrence with the change. Ms. Valentine confirmed.
Chairman Harris moved for approval. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
11) PECEIVE A REPORT REGARDING PROJECTS ON WHICH AESTHETIC ENHANCEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED AND DIRECT STAFF’ AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE
Board Minutes September 10, 1992 Page 6
Ms. Valentine stated that staff had reviewed all the detention basins in the 10-Year Plan, determining which were currently in urban areas, and which may be in urbanized areas by the time construction begins. On the basis of cost per lineal foot committed for the Oakey Detention Basin site, landscaping cost estimates were roughly projected. Based upon this criteria, staff estimates that there could be funding requests for landscaping amounting to approximately $3.6 million. She added that the report did not include any other enhancements, i.e. off-site improvements, etc.
Councilman Bletsch stated that this was the item which, at a previous Board Meeting, Commissioner Dondero had suggested that funding for landscaping and aesthetic enhancements be equally shared between the requesting entity and the District. She added that upon review of the previously approved funding and future possible requirements, she agreed with Commissioner Dondero, and felt the Board should not carry the full burden of funding landscaping.
Councilman Higginson commented that he felt the Board had already established a policy, that the District would fund these types of improvements. He added that the state law clearly stated that flood control dollars can be used to mitigate public impact, going so far as to say that funding can be provided to construct recreational facilities to make the project more accommodating to the community.
Councilman Bletsch asked if the Board had previously set a limit on the amount of funding that could be allocated for landscaping. Ms. Valentine stated there were no limits in place, that the Board makes the decision on a case-by-case basis, establishing a limit at the time of the interlocal approval.
Chairman Harris stated that the Board's past actions have set precedence, and the purpose of this item was to set policy.
Commissioner Woodbury commented that the Board has approved funding in the past for landscaping when it was deemed appropriate. In approving this type of expenditure, he added that it is important to be conservative, spending as much as possible on the actual projects. He requested that each entity minimize this type of expenditure, noting that there are certain instances where it is appropriate and necessary to approve landscaping funds.
Commissioner Woodbury moved to accept the reports.
Councilman Higginson said that the Board can review each request to fund landscaping as it is presented on a project-by-project basis. He further requested that, as required, each entity bring forward project landscaping plans which are as cost-
Board Minutes September 10, 1992 Page 7
effective, while accomplishing their goals, as they can possibly be.
Mayor Jones stated that the Board already has the flexibility and the policy to review the funding for landscaping expenditures on a project-by-project basis. She felt it would be detrimental to set a parameter which cannot be deviated from in the future.
Chairman Harris agreed with the motion to accept the report and suggested that the information be used in Carson City while lobbying. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
6
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
12) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO DIRECT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE TO REPRESENT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IN MATTERS RELATED TO THE KERN RIVER GAS PIPELINE
Ms. Valentine stated that the District Attorney requested authorization to enter testimony on behalf of the Regional Flood Control District in the Kern River lawsuit, The gas line traverses the west side of the Valley and crosses a number of facilities which may necessitate modifications. The project may need to be deepened or widened to accommodate the gas pipeline, thus increasing the cost of the facilities.
Councilman Bletsch moved for approval.
Councilman Higginson asked if the District was involved in the lawsuit. Ms. Valentine stated that the Regional Flood Control District is not a party in the lawsuit. Mr. Figgins added that the District Attorney could not do a Motion to Intervene at this time because it is too late; however, the District could enter the case under NRS 37. The main concern is if one of the entities (Clark County, or the cities of North Las Vegas or Las Vegas) pulls out of the lawsuit, the District Attorney would be able to argue on behalf of the Regional Flood Control District. Currently, Mr. Figgins said, up to $600,000 could be recovered.
There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
Board Minutes September 10,. 1992 Page 8
13) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE PROJECT STATUS REPORTS
Ms. Valentine stated there are 29 projects complete to date, 10 currently under construction, and about 22 in design or awaiting start of construction. She cited the significant milestones reached during the month of August in project completions and starts. Ms. Catherine Razor gave a brief overview of the status of the projects.
Chairman Harris moved to accept the Project Status Reports. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
14) ACTION TO ACCEPT THE FINANCIAL REPORTS
Ms. Valentine said the usual monthly Financial Reports were in order for approval.
Chairman Harris moved for acceptance. There being no further discussion, the motion carried.
VOTE: 7 AYES - 0 NAYS
15) CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
There was none.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Chairman Harris adjourned the meeting at 8:59 a.m.
Respectfully submitted, Attest: 1992
V I R ~ N I A VALENTINE, P.E. MICHAEL R. HARRIS GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER CHAIRMAN
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL F W D CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
FLOOD INSURANCE RESTUDY - STREAM PRIORITY
STAFF:
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Approve revised FIS priority list, Exhibit C, and submit to FEMA.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.
CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.
RFCD AGENDA ITEM # 3 Date: 10/8/92
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL, FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
SUBJECT:
FLOOD INSURANCE RESTUDY - S W A M PRIORITY
PETITIONER:
VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF ENGINEER
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
DISCUSSION AND ACTION ON THE ADOPTED STREAM PRIORITIES FOR FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES (FIS)
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
On March 8, 1990, the Regional Flood Control District Board approved a resolution, included in the backup as Exhibit A, establishing hydrologic study areas and prioritization recommendations to be forwarded to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for use in updating the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the Las Vegas Valley.
On January 9, 1992, after completion of the FIS Hydrology Study and prior to commencement of the first FIS restudies, the Board approved a revision to the FIS study area priority list, included in the backup as Exhibit B. Based on project completions and entity coordination, the Flamingo Wash study area was moved from second priority to fourth.
During recent discussions with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) regarding their 5-year FIS budget forecast, it was made clear that FEMA is interested in continuing with the Las Vegas Valley FIS priority list until it is completed. The FIS for the Tropicana Wash and portions of the Blue Diamond/Duck Creek system are currently scheduled for completion by the end of 1992, and several flood control master plan projects have begun or will begin construction in the near future. For these reasons, staff has reviewed and proposed revisions to the FIS priority list as shown in Exhibit C. The final Board approved priority list will be forwarded to FEMA for their use.
Respectfully submitted,
TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA ITEM# 5 ITEM# 3 Date: 9/24/92 Date: 10/8/92
Virginia Valentine, P.E. General ManagerKhief Engineer
. .
Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: FLOOD INSURANCE RESTUDY - STREAM PRIORXTY
Date: 9/25/92
On March 8, 1990, the Board approved a resolution establishing hydrologic study areas and prioritization recommendations to be forwarded to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for use in updating the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for the I s Vegas Valley. On January 9, 1992, the Board approved a revision to the FIS study area priorities based on project completions and entity coordination.
The FIS for the Tropicana Wash and portions of the Blue DiamondIDuck Creek system are currently scheduled for completion by the end of 1992, and several flood control master plan projects have begun or will begin construction in the near future. For these reasons a review and possible revision to the FIS priority list should be considered. The final Board approved priority list will be forwarded to FEMA for their use in preparing their 5-year FIS budget.
Staff Recommendation:
Consider and approve the staff recommended revised FIS priority list, Exhibit C, and submit to FEMA.
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA # 5 Date: 9/24/92
Recommendation:
Approve the revised priority list as recommended by staff.
I AGENDA # 5 Date: 9/28/92
Approve.
EXHIBIT "A"
RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH HYDROLOGIC STUDY AREAS AND P R I O R I T I Z A T I O N RECOMMENDATIONS TO FEMA
WHEREAS, the Reg iona l F lood Con t ro l Dis t r ic t Board d e s i r e s t o have a F lood Insurance Res tudy of the L a s Vegas Valley conducted by t h e F e d e r a l Emergency Management Agency;
WHEREAS, the Reg iona l F lood C o n t r o l Dis t r ic t Board has e s t a b l i s h e d s p e c i f i c areas t o b e r e s t u d i e d ;
WHEREAS, The Regional F lood Cont ro l Dis t r ic t Board has e s t a b l i s h e d p r i o r i t i e s f o r f e d e r a l l y - f u n d e d F l o o d Insu rance Updates; and
WHEREAS, the Reg iona l F lood Con t ro l Dis t r ic t Board i s comprised of r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s f r o m a l l e n t i t i e s i n t h e Las Vegas V a l l e y , i n c l u d i n g C l a r k C o u n t y , C i t y o f L a s Vegas , Ci ty of North L a s Vegas, and Ci ty of Henderson, a l l of which are communities p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n the Nat iona l F lood Insurance Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I T RESOLVED t h a t t h e Board o f Di rec tors of t h e Regional Flood C o n t r o l Dis t r ic t h e r e b y e s t a b l i s h e s t h e areas of t h e Las Vegas Val ley for Flood Insu rance R e s t u d i e s a n d p r i o r i t i e s f o r upda t ing t he F lood In su rance S tudy as o u t l i n e d i n a t t a c h m e n t " A . "
PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED t h i s e i g h t h d a y o f March, 1 9 9 0 .
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
1 LTiZ urn& BRUCE L. WOODBURY, CHAlkMAN
ATTEST : I 1990
L
EN L. KELLER S e c r e t a r y t o F l o o d Con t ro l Board
6CtibitA 1 omm2
HYDROLOGIC UNIT
A t t a c h m e n t ItA1' Federa l Emergency Management Agency
F l o o d Insurance R e s t u d y L a s V e g a s V a l l e y R e s t u d y A r e a s & P r i o r i t i e s
March a, 1990
I . C - 1 CHANNEL HYDROLOGIC UNIT A. C-1 CHANNEL
1. CONFLUENCE W / LAS VEGAS WASH TO
* 2. LAKE MEAD BLVD. TO BOULDER HWY. LAKE MEA0 BLVD.
3. BOULDER HWY. TO MISSION DR. (SOUTH S I DE 29-22-64)
* B. BREAKOUT FLOW * 1. LEFT OVERBANK
* a. KOLA STREET TO LAKE MEAD BLVD.
11. PITTMAN WASH HYDROLOGIC UNIT A. PITTMAN WASH
1. CONFLUENCE W / DUCK CREEK (BOULDER HWY. ) TO UPRR
2. UPRR TO PEBBLE RD. (S. SIDE 13-22-61)
B. PITTMAN WASH TRIBUTARIES WITHIN THE CITY OF. HENDERSON, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY LAKE MEAD DRIVE ON THE SOUTH, W. SIDE SEC 16-22-62 ON THE WEST, E. SIDE SEC 15-22-62
N. SIDE SEC 10-22-62 (WARM SPRINGS (GIBSON RD. ) ON THE EAST, AND
RD.) ON THE NORTH
I11 . DUCK CREEK HYDROLOGIC UNIT A. DUCK CREEK * 1. CONFLUENCE W/ LAS VEGAS WASH
TO CONFLUENCE OF BLUE DIAMOND WASH
* 2. CONFLUENCE OF BLUE DIAMOND
3. INDUSTRIAL RD. TO RAINBOW WASH TO INDUSTRIAL RD.
BLVD. (LOWER END OF ALLUVIAL FAN STUDY AREA)
MILES OF STUDY
SUB-REACH REACH STREAM UNIT --- 7.6
6.5 1.5
3.4 1.6
1.1 1.1
1.1
13.2 7.2
3.6
3.6
6.0
36.4 19.3
12.1
3.8
3.4
At tachmen t "A " March 8, 1990 Page 2
MILES OF STUDY
HYDROLOGIC UNIT
B. BOULDER HWY. TRIBUTARY
C. BLUE DIAMOND WASH 1. T H I S I S PART OF PITTMAN WASH
* 1. CONFLUENCE W / DUCK CREEK TO UPRR
END OF ALLUVIAL FAN STUDY AREA)
* 1. CONFLUENCE W / BLUE DIAMOND WASH
2. UPRR TO RAINBOW BLVD. (LOWER
2. UPRR TO RAINBOW BLVD. (LOWER
D. SOUTH BRANCH BLUE DIAMOND WASH
TO UPRR
END OF ALLUVIAL FAN STUDY AREA) * E. BREAKOUT FLOWS
* 1. RIGHT OVERBANK
* 2. LEFT OVERBANK * a. UPRR TO PECOS STREET
* a. SUNSET RD. TO BOULDER HWY. * b. BOULDER HWY. TO LAS VEGAS WASH
IV. TROPICANA WASH HYDROLOGIC UNIT A. TROPICANA WASH
UPPR * 1. CONFLUENCE WFLAMINGO WASH TO
* 2. NORTH BRANCH * a. UPRR TO JONES BLVD. * b o JONES BLVD. TO RAINBOW BLVD.
(LOWER END OF ALLUVIAL FAN STUDY AREA)
* 3. CENTRAL BRANCH * a. UPRR TO DECATUR BLVD. * b o DECATUR BLVD. TO RAINBOW BLVD.
(LOWER END OF ALLUVIAL FAN STUDY AREA)
4. SOUTH BRANCH * a. DECATUR BLVD. TO PATRICK LANE
b o PATRICK LANE TO RAINBOW BLVD. (LOWER END OF ALLUVIAL FAN STUDY AREA)
SUB-REACH
0.5
3.3 1.5
1.9 1.3
1.1 2.1
1.8 1.1
REACH STREAM UNIT --- 0.0
5.9 0.0
4.3
1.6
5.9 4.5
1.4
5.3 0.5
4.8
19.9 17.6
3.4
3.2
3.2
2.9
A t t a c h m e n t " A " M a r c h 8, 1990 Page 3
MILES OF STUDY
SUB-REACH REACH STREAM UNIT
8
HYDROLOGIC UNIT
5. UNNAMED TRIBUTARY a. CONFLUENCE W / TROPICANA WASH
TO UPRR (LOCATED WEST OF 1-15) 6. AIRPORT CHANNEL
TO UPRR a. CONFLUENCE W/ TROPICANA WASH
* B. UPRR BREAKOUT * 1. UPRR TO FLAMINGO WASH
V. FLAMINGO WASH HYDROLOGIC UNIT * A. FLAMINGO WASH
* 1. CONFLUENCE W/ LAS VEGAS WASH TO
* 2. RAINBOW BLVD. TO DURANGO DR. B . RED ROCK WASH (BUFFALO CHANNEL) * 1. CONFLUENCE W/ FLAMINGO WASH
RAINBOW BLVD.
TO TROPICANA AVE. 2. TROPICANA AVE. TO HARMON AVE .
* C. BREAKOUT FLOW * 1. UPRR BREAKOUT - NORTH
* a. FLAMINGO WASH TO SPRING MOUNTAIN ROAD
* 2. UPRR BREAKOUT - SOUTH
* 3. 1-15 BREAKOUT * a. UPRR CROSSING TO WINNICK AVE.
* a. NORTH BRANCH - I- 15 TO DESERT INN ROAD
MARYLAND PKWY. TO EASTERN AVE.
* a. BOULDER HWY. TO LAS VEGAS WASH
* a. FLAMINGO WASH BETWEEN NELLIS BLVD. TO LAS VEGAS WASH
* b. SOUTH BRANCH - TWAIN AVE. AND
* 4. BOULDER HWY. BREAKOUT
* 5 . SOUTH FLAMINGO BREAKOUT
1.5 1.5
3.4 3.4
2.3 2.3
27.7 14.8
12.6
2.2
0.5 1.0
0.5
0.8 11.9
0.8
0.9
5.4 0.9
4.3
1.1
2.1 2.1
2.7 2.7
A t t a c h m e n t "At1 March 8 , 1990 Page 4
I
HYDROLOGIC UNIT
VI. LAS VEGAS CREEK HYDROLOGIC UNIT * A. LAS VEGAS CREEK
* 1. CONFLUENCE W / LAS VEGAS WASH TO 1-15
* 2. 1-15 TO WILDROSE STREET EXTENDED * B. RIGHT OVERBANK OVERFLOWS
* 1. ALTA DRIVE BRANCH * a. CONFLUENCE W / LAS VEGAS WASH
TO WILDROSE STREET EXTENDED * 2. CHARLESTON BOULEVARD BRANCH
* a. CONFLUENCE W / LAS VEGAS WASH TO ALTA DRIVE BRANCH AT 1-15
* C. LEFT OVERBANK OVERFLOWS * 1. CONFLUENCE W / LAS VEGAS WASH
D. LAS VEGAS CREEK TRIBUTARY (SHEET AND/OR STREET FLOW AREAS) U.S. HWY 9 5 FROM WILDROSE STREET EXTENDED TO RAINBOW BLVD.
TO LAS VEGAS BLVD.
E. OTHER AREAS (SHEET AND/OR STREET FLOW) 1. RANCHO DR. SOUTH FROM ANN RD. TO
2. U.S. HWY 95 FROM CHEYENNE AVE.
3. GOWAN RD. FROM U.S . HWY 95 TO
LAS VEGAS CREEK
TO RANCHO ROAD
WESTERN TRIB. OF LAS VEGAS WASH
MILES OF STUDY
SUB-REACH REACH STREAM UNIT --- 41.7
6.2 4.7
1.5
7.8 13.1
7.8
5.3 5.3
3.5 3.5
3.5
* VII. RANGE WASH (SLOAN CHANNEL) HYDROLOGIC UNIT * A. RANGE WASH
* 1. CONFLUENCE W / LAS VEGAS WASH TO CONFLUENCE W/ WESTERN TRIB. OF RANGE WASH
* B. WESTERN TRIB. TO RANGE WASH * 1. CONFLUENCE W / RANGE WASH TO
UNNAMED NORTHERN TRIB. TO WESTERN TRIB. OF RANGE WASH
* 2. UNNAMED NORTHERN TRIB. TO WESTERN TRIB. OF RANGE WASH TO 1-15
* 3. 1-15 TO UPRR
15.4 7.4
2.4
5.6
17.9 4.4
4.4
5.1 2.3
2.3
0.5
A t t a c h m e n t " A " March 8, 1990 Page 5
MILES OF STUDY
I
HYDROLOGIC UNIT SUB-REACH REACH STREAM UNIT
* C. EASTERN TRIB. TO RANGE WASH * 1. CONFLUENCE W/ RANGE WASH TO
NELLIS AIR FORCE BASE * D. UNNAMED NORTHERN TRIB. TO THE WESTERN
* 1. CONFLUENCE W / WESTERN TRIB. OF RANGE WASH
RANGE WASH TO UPRR * E. BREAKOUT FLOWS
* 1. RIGHT OVERBANK
* 2. LEFT OVERBANK * a. CHEYENNE AVE. TO STEWART AVE.
* a. CHARLESTON BLVD. TO LAS VEGAS WASH
VIII. LAS VEGAS WASH HYDROLOGIC UNIT A. LAS VEGAS WASH
1. NORTH SHORE RD. TO WEST SIDE
2. WEST SIDE SEC 22-21-63 TO SEC 22-21-63 (LAKE LAS VEGAS)
CONFLUENCE W/ DUCK CREEK (WEST S IDE SEC 25-21-62)
* 3. CONFLUENCE W/ DUCK CREEK TO CONFLUENCE W/ FLAMINGO WASH
* 4. CONFLUENCE W/ FLAMINGO WASH TO CONFLUENCE W/ WESTERN TRIB. -OF LAS VEGAS WASH
LAS VEGAS WASH TO LONE MTN. RD. * 5. CONFLUENCE W / WESTERN TRIB. OF
6. LONE MTN. RD. TO ELKORN RD. (NORTH SIDE SEC 23-19-61)
B. WESTERN TRIB. OF THE LAS VEGAS WASH * 1. CONFLUENCE W/ LAS VEGAS WASH TO
1-15 * 2. 1-15 TO LONE MTN. RD.
3. LONE MTN. RD. TO JONES BLVD. (WEST SIDE SEC 24-19-60)
* C. KING CHARLES DIVERSION CHANNEL * 1. LAS VEGAS WASH TO WESTERN TRIB.
OF THE LAS VEGAS WASH
1.0 1.0
3.0
3.0
4.4 3.2
1.2 3.2
1.2
34.5 23.3
2.4
4.5
4.1
6.5
2.5
3.3
8.4 1.1
2.2 5.1
1.1 1.1
At tachmen t "A " M a r c h 8, 1990 Page 6
MILES OF STUDY
i
HYDROLOGIC UNIT
* D. LAS VEGAS WASH OVERFLOW TO RANGE WASH * 1. CONFLUENCE W/ RANGE WASH TO LAS
VEGAS BLVD.
SUB-REACH REACH STREAM UNIT --- 1.7
1.7
IX. ALLUVIAL FAN AND/OR STREET FLOW HYDROLOGIC UNIT n.a. A. WESTERN AREA n.a.
1. AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY n.a. CHARLESTON BLVD. TO THE NORTH, BLUE DIAMOND RD. TO THE SOUTH, RAINBOW BLVD. TO THE EAST INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING:
* a. RED ROCK FAN NO. 1 (RED ROCK FAN)
* b. FLAMINGO FAN NO. 1 (SEC 22-21-59)
(SEC 26-21-59) * c. FLAMINGO FAN NO. 2
* d. FLAMINGO FAN NO. 3 (SEC 35-21-59)
* e. TROPICANA FAN (BLUE DIAMOND FAN)
2. AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY ALEXANDER ROAD TO THE NORTH, CHARLESTON BLVD. TO THE SOUTH , WEST OF FORT APACHE ROAD
ALEXANDER ROAD TO THE SOUTH, HAULPAI WAY ON THE WEST, KYLE CANYON WASH ON THE NORTH, U.S. 95 ON THE EAST
3. AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY
B. EASTERN AREA 1. EASTERN C-1 AREA
(SEC 23-22-64)
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a. n.a.
TOTAL 198.9
NOTE: ENTRIES WITH A "*'I INDICATES STUDY AREAS PROPOSED BY FEW.
Attachment "A" March 8, 1990' Page 7
P r i o r i t i e s
1) Duck Creek - Blue Diamond Wash
2) Flamingo Wash and Associated Alluvial Fan
3) Tropicana Wash
4) C-1 Channel and Associated Alluvial Fan
5) Northwest A1 l u v i a l Fans
6) Las Vegas Creek
7) Pittman Wash
8) Las Vegas Wash
9) East Range Wash
10) West Range Wash
11) Northwest Las Vegas
EXHIBIT "B"
January 9. 1992 Pnonhes . . .
8
Duck Creek - Blue Diamond Wash
Tropicana Wash
C-1 Channel & Associated Alluvial Fan
Flamingo Wash & Associated Alluvial Fan
Northwest Alluvial Fans
Las Vegas Creek Pittman Wash Las Vegas Wash
East Range Wash
West Range Wash
Northwest Las Vegas
EXHIBIT "C"
1) Blue Diamond/Duck Creek - Complete unstudied reaches.
2) Las Vegas Wash - Initial reaches of multi-reach study. priority upgraded due to construction of Upper Las Vegas Detention Basin.
3) Northwest Lsrs Vega - The area bound by Ann Road, Buffalo Drive, Washington Avenue, and 1-15. Priority upgraded due to the need to resolve discrepancies between current maps at jurisdictional boundaries.
4) Pittman Wash - Priority upgraded to reflect completion of Phase I and I1 improvements.
5) Range Wash - This constitutes a combination of the hydrographic basins for the East and West Range Washes. Priority upgraded due to proposed construction within the time frame of commencement of this study.
6) C-1 Chamel and Fan
7) Flamingo Wash and Fan
8) Northwest Fan
9) Las Vegas Creek
REVISED PRIORITY LIST
0 .......... ..........
.. . - . _
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
I SUBJECT: 1 RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS AT PECOS ROAD, SANDHILL ROAD, AND MOUNTAIN VISTA STREET - AWARD OF BID (CLA.02.F.92)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Approve Clark County's recommendation for Award of Bid.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Approve.
CITIZENS COMMIlTEE: Approve.
RFCD AGENDA l m " 4 Date: 1018192
CLARK COUNTY
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECX
RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS AT PECOS ROAD, SANDHILL ROAD, 1 AND MOUNTAIN VISTA STREET I I PETITIONER
M. J. MANNING, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER
THAT THE REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT APPROVE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT THE RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS AT PECOS ROAD, SANDHILL ROAD, AND MOUNTAIN VISTA STREET, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, TO THE BEST BIDDER, LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION, IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 875,819.00.
FlSCAL IMPAm $ 833,122.50 Funded by Regional Flood Control District
$ 42,696.50 Clark County (Fund No. 202) $ 875,819.00 Total
(Fund No. 444)
BACKGROUM):
On September 18, 1992, bids were opened for the Rawhide Channel Crossings at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road, and Mountain Vista Street in Las Vegas, Nevada in the off ice of the Director of General Services. Las Vegas Paving Corporation was the best bidder in the amount of $ 875,819.00. A copy of the bid abstract is attached.
R m y rubmitted,
UBLIC WORKS MJM:JJC:bat
Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: Date: 9/25/92
RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS AT PECOS ROAD, SANDHILL ROAD AND MOUNTAIN VISTA STREET - AWARD OF BID (CLA.02.F.92)
Bids were opened on September 18, 1992 for construction of the Rawhide Channel Crossings at Pecos Road, Sandhill Road, and Mountain Vista Street. Clark County has recommended Award of Bid to the best bidder, Las Vegas Paving Corporation, in the amount of $875,819.00. District funding is sufficient to cover the Award of Bid.
Staff Recommendation:
Approve Clark County’s recommendation for Award of Bid.
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee!: E # 7 Date: 9/24/92
Recommendation:
Approve.
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: 1 # 7 D Z Z 9 2
Recommendation:
Approve.
RAWHIDE CHANNEL CROSSINGS
AT PECOS ROAD8 SANDHILL ROAD8
AND MOUNTAIN VISTA STREET
BID NO. 2873-92
RAWHIDE STREET IMPROVEMENTS (STA. 2+55.7 to STA. 9+35.9)
ll Item Approx. Quantity
Plantmix Bituminous 222.0 Surface
Prime Coat 2 . 0
Seal Coat
611 Type I1 Under
42.0 4 " Type I1 Under sidewalk
530.0 10" Type I1 Under Pavement
0 .8
32 .0 Curb & Gutter
4 " Concrete Sidewalk 3,400.0
rlLvl Type Curb & Gutter 680.0
Roadwav Excavation 710.0
TOTAL
Survey Traffic Mobilization
* Clark County Total Cost * RFCD Total Cost * Total Construction Cost
* Construction Cost per Las Vegas proposal
Unit Unit Bid Price
TON $ 300.00
TON $ 400.00
C.Y. $ 15.00
C.Y. $ 15 .00
C.Y. $ 15 .00
C.Y.
Total
$ 10,656.00
$ 600.00
S 320.00
$ 7,950.00
$ 630.00
$ 480.00
$ 6,800.00
S 6 .120.00
$ 5,680.00
S 39.236.00
$ 693.00 $ 742.00
2 ,025.00 $ 3 , 640.00
$ 42,696.50 $ 833,122.50 $ 875,819.00
Paving Corporation, Inc. bid
JJC: bat
ProJect Name: Project No:F911016
RAUHIOE CHANNEL CROSSINGS - Bid No. : 2873-92 Opening Date: 09/18/92 AT PECOS. SANDHILL. 6 MOUNTAIN V l S T A
1 MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS I1 Engineer's Estimate AS VEGA5 PAVING CORP. ELLS CARGO, INC. - - - - - - - - tem No.
105.01 107.01
200.01 109.01
202.01
202.02
202.03
202.04 202.05 202.06 202.07 202.08
203.01 203.02 209.01 212.01
302.01 213.01
403.01 402.01
405.01 406.01 407.01 502.01
502.03 502.02
502.04
502.05
603.01
603.02
605.01
605.02
609.01 609.02
- - - - - - - - -I_ -------------
h u n t _--_--__-____ 8.000.00
18.150.00 30.000.00
125.000.00 60,000.00
50.000.00
50,000.00
1.500.00
3.150.00 2.826.25
29.968.75 367.50
13.000.00 27.720.00 16.785.00 2.000.00 1.500.00
36.510.00 48.222.00
2,640.00
1.800.00 2.750.00
144,625.00 1.800.00
32.400.00 3,500.00
4.370.00
13.780.00
7;800.00
2,000.00
55,200.00
57:728.00
6.300.00 3.300.00 _------- -----.
- - - - - - - - - Unit Pr ice
5.000.00 250.00
0.000.00 0.000.00 5.000.00
5.000.00
6.000.00
2.50
3.00 1 .oo 2.50 2.00
5.00 5.00
15.00 2.500.00
500.00 12.00 40.00 40.00
250.00 300.00 250.00 300.00
3.000.00 200.00
100.00
40.00
54.00
72.00
520.00
360.00
2.100.00 1.000.00
--------_
- - - - - - - - - Unit Pr ice
8.000.00 165.00
30.000.00 25.000.00 60,000.00
50.000.00
50.000.00
4 . 0 0
3.50 1 .75
1.75 3 . 7 s
25 .00
45.00 18.00
2.000.00 1.500.00
30 .00
120.00 54.00
900.00
900.00 550.00
325.00
3.500.00 600.00
115.00
106.00
65 .00
250.00
100.00
352.00
2,100.00 1.100.00
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - .
. - - - - - - - - Unit Pr ice
12.000.00 140.00
30.000.00 !8.769.00 12.230.00
15.725.00
11.650.00
2.00 3.00 5.00 5.00
10.00
31 .OO 9.00
40.00 3.500.00
500.00 20.00 56.00
105.00
900.00 300.00 400.00 280.00
4.000.00 190.00
50.00
20.00
85.00
300.00
760.00
670.00
1.500.00 900.00
. - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -.
h u n t ---- Amount
12,000.00
30.000.00 24.200.00
92.000.00 16.000.00
16.000.00
16.000.00
750.00 3.230.00 2.700.00
34.250.00 294.00
18.480.00 6.240.00
10.000.00 7.460.00
5.000.00
32.148.00 18.863.50
880.00
600.00 1.575.00
111.250.00 600.00
13,500.00 7.500.00
1.900.00
6.500.00
4.800.00
360.00
256.680.00
50.840.00
Unit Pr ice
12.000.00
30,000.00 220.00
92.000.00 16,000.00
16,000.00
16.000.00
2.00 2.00 3 .00
3.00 2.00
12.00 12.00 20.00
10.000.00 5.000.00
15.50 36 .00 40.00
300.00 315.00 300.00 250.00 250.00
7.500.00
50 .00
50.00
40.00
45.00
465.00
310.00
3,000.00 2,000.00
. - - - - - - - - -,
---------.
Unit Pr ice
16.000.00
l0.000.00 150.00
17.100.00 8.400.00
3.900.00
5.600.00
2.60 2.00 2.10 1.60 5.00
11.70 6.85
7.500.00 17.00
500.00 19.00
100.00 26.00
350.00 350.00 350.00 315.00 220.00
8.590.00
110.00
150.00
56.00
61 .OO
590.00
352.00
2.286.00 935.00 - - - - - - - -.
- - - - - - - - - - -. Amount
16.000.00 16,500.00 30.000.00 47.100.00
8.400.00
3.900.00
5.600.00
3.230.00 975.00
1.890.00 27,400.00
490.00
10.549.00 6.084.00
6,341.00 7.500.00
500.00 23,123.00 23.218.00
2,200.00
700.00 1.750.00
140.175.00 700.00
11.880.00 8.590.00
4.180.00
19.500.00
6.720.00
488.00
325.680.00
57.728.00
6.858.00 2.805.00 ------------
h u n t ._______-_-____ -,,
12.000.00
30.000.00 15.400.00
28.769.00 - 12.230.00
. _ 1
4 3
27.500.00 15.000.00
30.000.00 20.000.00 15.000.00
5.000.00
6.000.00
937.50 1.615.00 2.700.00
42.812.50 196.00
2.600.00
5.595.00 7.700.00
2.500.00
14.604.00 500.00
35.720.00 880.00
15.400.00 16.500.00 30.000.00 45,000.00
5.000.00
5.000.00
2,500.00
1,615.00 750.00
1,350.00 17.125.00
490.00
12.320.00 7.800.00
7.460.00 7.700.00
100.00 18.255.00 42.864.00
2.310.00
1.800.00 1.500.00
112.585.00 800.00
8.100.00 5.000.00
1.520.00
6,500.00
7.200.00
640.00
278.760.00
76.260.00
5.400.00 ' 5,400.00
1 L . S .
1 L . S . 1 L . S . 1 L . S .
1 L.S.
1 L . S .
375 L.F. 1.615 S.F.
900 S . F . 7.125 S.F.
98 L.F.
1.540 C . Y . 520 C . Y .
373 C . Y . 1 L . S .
1.217 C.Y. 1 L . S .
893 TON 22 TON
2 TON 5 TON
445 C . Y . 2 TON
54 C.Y. 1 L . S .
38 L.F.
130 L.F.
120 L.F.
8 L.F.
552 L.F.
164 L.F.
3 EACH 3 EACH
110 DAY 5,400.00
150.00 ~0,000.00 5.000.00 5.000.00
5,000.00
2,500.00
2.00 1 .oo 1.50
5 . 0 0 1 .oo
15.00 8.00
20.00 7.700.00
100.00
48.00 15.00
105.00
900.00 300.00 400.00 253.00
5,000.00 150.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
80.00
505.00
465.00
1.800.00 1.800.00
15,725.00
11.650.00
750.00 4.845.00
85.625.00 4,500.00
980.00
16.120.00 13.860.00 14.920.00 3.500.00
24.340.00 500.00
50,008.00 2.310.00
500.00 1.500.00
133.500.00 500.00
10.800.00 3.000.00
3.800.00
5.200.00
6.480.00
576.00
287.040.00
59.040.00
6.300.00 3.000.00
1.500.00 1.800.00
124.600.00 800.00
10.260.00 14.000.00
1.900.00
2.600.00
10.200.00
2.400.00
419.520.00
109.880.00
4,500.00 2,700.00
$1.054.692.00 __________- - - -
9.000.00 6.000.00
$817.600.50 -- ------__--. .--.
* $864,692.50 $758.096.00 $751,004.00 $828.754.00
i i
. . . .-.
Project No:F911016 Project Name: RAUHIOE CHANNEL CROSSINGS - Bid No. : 2873-92 Opening Date: 09/18/92
AT PECOS. SANOHILL. 6 MOUNTAIN VISTA PAGE 2
I AS VEGAS PAVING CORP. ELLS CARGO, INC. IEORGE BERNADOT COMPANY R8 CONTRACTORS. INC - - - - - - - - . Unit
Price
2,400.00 2.500.00
130.00
140.00
10.00 2.50 6.00
10.00
250.00 10.00
200.00
75.00 200.00
65.00 45.00 35.00 28.00
1.750.00 750.00
- - - - - - - -. Amount
-----_-_-__- h u n t -----_------ 3,000 .OO 3,000.00
23.373.00
23.040.00
14.087.50 14.607.50 .1.488.00
7.786.00 725.00
500.00
1.500.00
100.00
2.000.00 1.200.00
36.000.00 16.050.00
12.000.00 500.00
2.000.00
_----- ------. $162.957.00 5980,557.50
-I- ._----__ ten No.
609.04 609.03
611.01
611.02
613.01 613.02 613.03 613.04 616.01 616.02
616.03
627.01
629.01 627.02
630.01 630.02 630.03 630.04 630.05
. - - - - - - -
.----- )uan .
1
159 1
128
I, 127 5.843
372
916 58
2
2
1 6
600 20
535 10 6 1
.---_-
.-__ nit
9CH 4CH . F .
. F.
. F.
.F.
. F.
. F.
RCH . F.
RCH
LCH RCH .F. .F. . F . . F . RCH RCH
----
--. UI
E l E l L
L
S L
S 1 L El
E,
E, Et L L L L Et E<
- .
- - - - - - - - - Price
Um t
2.500.00 1,300.00
123.00
180.00
9.00 2.00 4 .00
15.00 8.50
175.00
325.00
100.00 160.00
33.00 50.00
31.00
1,000.00 50.00
500.00
------_- ~
- - - - - - - - - . Unit Pr ice
3,000.00 3.000.00
147.00
180.00
12.50 2.50
12.50 4.00
8 .50 250.00
750.00
100.00 .200.00 100.00 60.00 30.00
2.000.00 50.00
2.000.00
- - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - -
Price Unit
3.254.00 1,822.00
120.00
175.00
9.00 2.00
12.50 4.25
380.00 10.00
550.00
100.00 165.00 40.00 53.00 48.00
1.500.00 162.00
1.838.00
- - - - - - - - -
----- - ---. Unit Price
3.000.00 1.600.00
144.00
208.00
12.00 2.50 4.75
18.00
456.00 9.75
660.00
75.00 350.00 114.00 39.00 36.00
2.700.00 262.00
1.800.00
---------.
-------- Unit
Pr ice
2.200.00 1,100.00
105.00
150.00
8.00 2.00 4 .00
11.00
400.00 10.00
600.00
100.00 150.00 100.00
80.00 44.00
300.00 1.125.00 1.175.00
- - - - - - - -
~ - - - - - - -.
0
4 H 1 c 1 c c 4
I 4 7
R (
P c 8 1
S 4 R
Amount - - - - - - - - - -. 3.254.00
19.080.00 1,822.00
22.400.00
10.143.00 11.686.00 1.581.00
9,160.00 725.00
760.00
1,100.00
100.00 990.00
31.800.00 800. 00
25.680.00 1.620.00 9.000.00 1.838.00
Amount _--------__-_ 3.000.00
22.896.00 1.600.00
26.624.00
13.524.00 14.607.50
1.767.00 1.044.00 8.931 .OO
912.00
1.320.00
75.00 2.100.00
23.400.00 2,280.00
19.260.00 2.620.00
16.200.00 1.800.00
2 .400.00 2,500.00
20,670.00
17.920.00
11.270.00 14.607.50 2.232.00
580.00 9.160.00
500.00
400.00
2,500.00 1.300.00
19.557.00
23.040.00
10,143.00 11.686.00 1.488.00
870.00 7.786.00
350.00
650.00
2.200.00 1.100.00
16.695.00
19.200.00
11.686.00 9.016.00
1.488.00 638.00
9.160.00 800.00
1,200.00
100.00
2.000.00 900.00
26,400.00 42.800.00 3.000.00 6.750.00 1.175.00
75.00 1,200.00
27.000.00 1.300.00
18.725.00 280.00
10,500.00 750.00
960.00 100.00
1.000.00 19.800.00 16.585.00
500.00 6.000.00
500.00
~ 1 . 2 1 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 $156.308.00
$1.028.653.00 $163.960.50
Extended amounts are - -s tcd. GRANO TOTAL
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
ANGEL PARK OUTLET AND OUTFALL (BUFFALO CHANNEL) - CONTRACT MODIFICATION NO. 4 (LAS.Ol.A.87)
STAFF:
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Approve $134,323.65 of Contract Modification No. 4 and provide remaining $91,472.38 after all avenues for securing reimbursement from Nevada Power Company have been exhausted.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: The vote was 5-Ayes, 3-Nays to approve.
CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Follow staff recommendation.
RFCD AGENDA
Date: 10/8/92
CLARK COUNTY
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
I SUBJECT: ANGEL PARK OUTLET AND OUTFALL - Contract Modification lr4 I PETITIONER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: That the District approve Contract Modification f4.
FISCAL IMPACT: Original Contract Amount $4,772,977.10 Previous Contract Modifications 1, 2 & 3 $ 19,259.15 Final Contract Modi f i cat i on #4 $ 225,796.03
Percent increase all contract modifications 5.1% BACKGROUND: During the construction of the outfall, additional security measures were needed for pedestrian grating, "No Trespass Signs" (75 feet spacing) to keep children out, and an additional temporary construction easement along the channel (Items 1, 2, 3 and 4 on Contract Modification 14 at a total cost of $23,905.40). Also, included in this request are final quantity adjustments for the job (Item 5 at a cost of $110,418.25). Finally, costs due to extensive and unforeseen delays by Nevada Power have been negotiated with the Contractor (Item 6 at a cost o f $91,472.38). The City is seeking reimbursement from Nevada Power. Reimbursement of any funds from Nevada Power will be forwarded to the District.
A1 1 work and associated costs have been reviewed by the Consultant and Pub1 ic Works staff and are considered to be equitable.
bmitted, 4
TAC AGENDA ITEM# 8
RFCD AGENDA
Date: 10/8/92 Date: 9/24/92 ITEM# 5
Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: I Date: 9/16/92
ANGEL PARK OUTLET AND OUTFALL (BUFFALO CHANNEL) - CONTRACT MODIFICATION NUMBER 4 (LAS.Ol.A.87)
The City of L a s Vegas has negotiated a contract modification for the Angel Park Outlet and Outfall (Buffalo Channel) project. This contract modification, totalling $225,796.03, represents additional work and final quantities ($134,323.65), and costs incurred in relocating Nevada Power Company facilities ($91,472.38).
Staff understands that the City of Las Vegas is seeking reimbursement of the $91,472.38 from Nevada Power Company. Staff is in agreement with the reimbursement of $134,323.65 to the City for additional work; however, payment in the amount of $91,472.38 for the Nevada Power Company portion shall be provided after the City has exhausted all avenues for securing reimbursement from Nevada Power.
Staff Recommendation:
Approve the amount of $134,323.65 as requested, and provide the remaining amount,$91,472.38 of Contract Modification Number 4 to the City of Las Vegas after they have exhausted all avenues for securing reimbursement from Nevada Power Company.
~ ~~~
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
The Technical Advisory Committee voted to approve the Contract Modification No. 4 as submitted by the City of L a s Vegas for the entire amount of $225,796.03.
VOTE: 5 AYES (Chiatovich, Hardy, Henry, Holler, Kajkowski) 3 NAYS (Chandler, Holmes, Manning)
Recommendation:
Approve.
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: I AGENDA # 8 Date: 9/28/92
Recommendation:
Follow the staff recommendation.
MAYOR JAN LAVERTY JONES
COUNCILMEN BOB NOLEN
ARNIE ADAMSEN SCOTT HICCINSON
FRANK HAWKINS JR.
CITY MANAGER WILLIAM J. NOONAN
CITY of LAS VEGAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
RICHARD D. GOECKE DIRECTOR
September 8 , 1992
Virginia Bax-Valentine, PE Chief Engineer General Manager Clark County Regional Flood Control District 301 E. Avenue, Suite 301 Las Vegas, NV 89101
SUBJECT: Angel Park Outlet and Outfall
Dear Ms. Valentine:
A claim has been made to the City of Las Vegas by Meadow Valley Construction for $91,472 for equipment standby and additional mobilization and de-mobilization costs associated with delays caused by Nevada Power on the Angel Park Outlet and Outfall Project. Costs have been certified for this claim. The amount was negotiated down from an original claim of approximately $i50,000. The City is seeking reimbursement from Nevada Power for this claim. We request the District consider this a legitimate claim. Any funds the City receives from Nevada Power will be forwarded to the District.
If you have any questions, please contact us.
Sincerely,
Richard Goecke, Director Department of Public Works SEP Iu 1992
cc: Charles Kajkowski, Jr., PE Tom Chiatovich, PE
Fi le : ... \rendy\angLepkl
400 E. STEWART AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89 101 -2986 (702) 229-6276
City of Las Vegas Office of the City Attorney
' Civil Division
Richard J. Bortolin Deputy City Attorney
400 E swm Smct 9th h, C$ Hall taC Vgas Ncvodrr 89101 F a (702) 3861 749
(702) 229-6201
September 15, 1992
Nevada Power Company 6226 West Sahara Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
R e : Angel Park Outlet and Outfall Nevada Power Company Delay Impact Damages
Gentlemen:
On February 28, 1992, the Angel Park Outlet and Outfal l contract between Meadow Valley Construct ion and t h e C i t y of Las Vegas was completed.
Meadow Valley Construct ion has made an impact damage claim a g a i n s t t h e C i t y of Las Vegas f o r t h e payment of $91,472.38 f o r a l ledged damages it sus t a ined due t o de l ays caused by Nevada Power Company dur ing cons t ruc t ion . The measure of t h e s e damages, as c la imed, a re set f o r t h i n a repor t p repared by t h e C i t y ' s con- s u l t a n t , G. C. Wallace, Inc. , which is enclosed for your r e fe rence and review.
Demand is hereby made upon Nevada Power Company f o r t h e payment of $91,472.38, p a y a b l e t o t h e C i t y of Las Vegas as reim- bursement for the payment of de l ay damages t o be paid t o Meadow va l ley Cons t ruc t ion under the Angel Park Out le t and Out fa l l c o n t r a c t .
S i n c e r e l y ,
BRADFORD R . J E R B I C CITY ATTORNEY
RICHARD J . BORTOLIN Deputy City Attorney
RJB/jca
cc: Gale Fraser , Deputy Director , Clark County Regional Flood Control District
Randy F u l t z
.. . . ,
CITY OF LAS VEGAS Las Vegas, Nevada CF "TRACT MODIFICATION
Purchase Order No. Supplement No.
Bid NO. 91.1730.01 Modification No. 4
Date: August 12, 1992 Name and Address of Contractor:
Meadow Valley Contractors 6917 Kim Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Contract Description:
Angel Park Outlet 6 Outfall
Description and Reason for Modification: 1. Safety grate 2. No trespass signs 3. Temporary construction easement 4. Remove concrete at flow inlet 5. Final quantity adjustment 6. NPCo delay costs
Price of this Modification (Written): Two hundred twenty five thousand seven hundred ninety six and three _- , cents
Dollars 6 225,796.03
Total Calendar Day Time Extension for this Modification: N/ A Days
Price of Original Contract 6 4,772,977.10
Price of Contract Including Previous Modifications 6 4,792,236.25 . I ..
Price of Contract including This Modification 6 5,018,032.28 1. ALL OTHER TERMS, CONDlTlONS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THIS CONTRACT, INCLUDING PREVIOUS M 0 D I F l ~ T 1 0 N S ,
REMAIN THE S A M E .
The City of Las Vegas and the Contractor named above do mutually agree to this contract modification in strict accordance with the terms stated above. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this modification as of the date of this modification.
Meadow Valley Contractors
APROVED:
MAYOR
n (NAME OF CONTRACTOR)
BY I (DATE)
i
(SIGNATURE) (TITLE)
(DATE) (APPKOVED BY) CITY MANAGER
ATTEST: CITY CLERK CHIEF, PURCHASING A N D CONTRACTS DIVISION
-03- cw-06
G. C: Wallace, Inc. - Construction Division . _
-04;
' * G.C. WALLACE, INC.
Subject: Angel Park Outlet and Outfall Change Order Request #4 Explanation of Line Item Additions
Gentlemen:
The change order request has news line items. The reasons are as follows:
1) Change Order #4 ADD - 6 6 grating over the RCP at the open channel at Vega Drive. This was due to the fact that the fence did not adequately keep children out of the open channel. Thus, the City requested that the open 6 6 RCP be grated to at least prevent anyone from access to the Vega Drive section.
2) Change Order #4 ADD - "No Trespass" signs. The City requested this as a way of future enforcement of people who are using the open channel for a walk-way or skate board area.
3) Change Order #4 ADD - Construction Easement payment. This was requested by the City due to the fact the property owner was not previously compensated for the use of the property. The contractor agreed to handle the transaction if given the standard 10% mark-up to cover the interest lost and administration of the payment.
4) Change Order #4 ADD - Remove concrete at new inlet located north of Vegas Drive at the end of the east side block wall. This was requested by the City in that the drain swale that runs from south to north along the block wall dumped into a new development. Therefore we needed to add another drain inlet into the channel. To do this, the existing channel needed to be cut down to accommodate the inlet.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
-06-
March 18. 1992
G. C. Wallace, Inc. Engineering/Architecture 1555 S. Rainbow Blvd . Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attention: Michael R. Dunning, P.E., Project Manager
RE: Angel Park Outlet & Outfall - Bid No. 91.1730.1 Storm Drain Safety Grate -- Change Order
Dear Mr. Dunning:
Meadow Valley will furnish and install the Safety Grate, fabricated per the detail furnished by G. C . Wallace, Inc., as follows:
Material Labor Equipment
$4500.. 00 501.20
Overhead/profit @ 10% 571.97 6283 - 42
Bond @ -008 51.; 717
Total cost $6333 - 69 4-8
Please call me if further information is required.
Sincerely yours, MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Donna Stickler Project Superintendent
8
GENERAL BUILDING AND GENERAL ENGINEERING
P.O. BOX 121, MOAPA, NV 89025 TELEPHONE 702664-2575
FAX 702-864-2580 G.C. WAUACE INC.
i.*? ,!L 1 APR 6 1992
,(I E
April 3, 1992 i -
E , E L!i G. C. Wallace, Inc. Engineering/Architecture 1555 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Attention: Michael R. Dunning, P.E., Project Manager
RE: Angel Park Outlet & Outfall - Bid No. 91.1730.1 No Trespass Signs
Dear Mr. Dunning:
Per our telephone conversation yesterday, Meadow Valley will furnish and install No Trespassing signs, made by Highway Rentals to your specification, every 75’ on the chain link fence along the channel for the lump sum price of $5,821.51.
With your verbal authorization, I have instructed Highway Rentals to begin fabrication of the signs. Please respond with written confirmation of your acceptance of price and authorization to proceed with this work.
I spoke with Harold of Highway Rentals, who feels they will be ready .. to . start installing signs in seven to ten days.
Sincerely yours, MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS, INC.
Project Superintendent
-08-
CONSTRUCTION EASEMEm COST
COST OF THE EASEMENT = $ 9,800 MEADOW VALLEY 10% MARK-UP = $ 980
(per contract allowable)
TOTAL = $ 10,780
-09-
M A Y O R J A N L A V E R T Y J O N E S
COUNCII" BOB N O L E N
A R S I E ADAMSEK SCOTT HlCClSSON
F R A N K H A W K I N S J H .
CITY MANA(;EH WILLIAIC1 J. KOONAN
May a, 1992
Mike Dunning, P.E. G. C. Wallace Engineering 1555 S. Rainbow Boulevard Las Vegas. NV 89102
RE: Monies to be paid to Lewis Homes for construction-related activities on the Angel Park/Gowan Detention Basin Conveyance System Project
Dear Mr. Dunning:
Lewis Homes has approached the City of Las Vegas seeking reimbursement for damages to their property south of Lake Mead Boulevard on the east side of the Buffalo Drainage Channel. During construction Meadow Valley Contractors encroached upon the Lewis Homes property (approximately 30 feet) without written permission to enter the property. The end result is a grade change of four feet to five feet which creates problems on the Lewis Homes lots. Mr. Nick Dane of Lewis Homes has agreed to remove a certain amount of the soil but'also feels a retaining wall would be necessary because of the grade elevation change. A workable solution is to p a y Lewis Homes $9,800 for the use of their property as a temporary construction easement during the period of construction.
The easement value was determined by ascertaining a rental value for the affected land as follows:
Land Area x Sq.Ft. Value x Rate of Return x Time = Easement Value 40,313.10 s.f. x $1.90/s.f. x 8-1/2% x 1-1/2 yrs. = 59,76585 Rounded to 59,800
Please prepare a change order concerning the above.
Anached please find two copies of Temporary Right-of-Entry which need to be executed by Lewis Homes. Lewis Homes will retain one copy (marked 'file copy - Lewis Homes') and the second copy should be returned to the City in the envelope provided.
Also attached is an envelope addressed to Meadow Valley Contractors which was returned to the City on two separate occasions. We would appreciate your transmitting this envelope to Meadow Valley at your eailiest convenience.
Flood Control Section Department of Public Works
TDC:ag Attachments P.\TOM\LEWISHObES EAS
.-
The undersigned he OF LAS VEGAS. a Mu Nevada, i t s succes and across the par
r y I f
Those port ions " your retention. I have attached a duplicate 6 map for
(SW 1/4) of Se
portions Of TE 1pe a t 229-6341. in the City Of If you have any questions, please contact
p l a t t he reo f o County, Nevada shown on t h e p Clark County, ;
PARCEL 1 (301 e The West 30 fel L/ WEST NO. 1 A BY
PARCEL 2 (30(
The West 30 fec WEST NO. 1D BY
Quar t e r , M . D . M . , ria, being n t h e rk 3MES as Sge 48 of
i TENAYA
- 1 TENAYA
The City o f Las Vegas and/or i t s Agents will restore the real property as nearly as possible to i t s original condition prior t o termination o f this Contract.
This Right-of-Entry i s conditioned upon the CITY OF LAS VEGAS assuming responsibility for any l i ab i l i t y which may result from the negligence of i t s employees or agents arising from the exercise o f the rights
This Right-of-Entry i s temporary and shall expire upon completion of s a i d channel improvements.
. herein granted.
RIGHT-OF-ENTRY GRANTED: DATE :
LEWIS HOMES-TENAYA LIETI-SHIP
BY:
-. TEMPORARY RIGHT-OF-ENTRY
The undersigned hereby grant(s) a temporary Right-of-Entry to the CITY OF LAS VEGAS, a Municipal Corporation of the County of Clark, S t a t e o f Nevada, i t s successors and ass igns, to a l low access onto. upon, over and across the parcel o f land here inaf ter descr ibed for construction Of the Buffalo Urainage Channel.
.~
The above-reference parcel o f l a n d i s described as:
Those portions of the East Half (E 1/2) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 22, Township 20 South, Range 6 0 East, M . D . M . , in the City of Las Vegas, County of Clark, State of Nevada, being portions of TENAYA WEST NO. 1A BY LEWIS HOMES as shown on the plat thereof on file in Book 48 of Plats, Page 45 of Clark County, Nevada Records and TENAYA WEST NO. 1 D BY LEWIS HOMES as shown on the plat thereof on file in Book 48 of Plats, Page 4 0 of Clark County, Nevada Records, described as fo l lows:
PARCEL 1 (300-645-033 thru 058)
The West 30 feet of Lots 52 through 77 in Block B of said TENAYA WEST NO. 1A BY LEWIS HOMES.
PARCEL 2 (300-648-036 thru 039)
The West 30 feet of Lots 48 through 51 in Block €3 of said TENAYA WEST NO. 1D BY LEWIS HOMES.
The City o f Las Vegas and/or i t s Agents will restore the rea l proper ty as near l y as poss ib le t o i t s o r i g i n a l c o n d i t i o n p r i o r t o terminat ion o f th is Contract .
RIGHT-OF-ENTRY GRANTED: . DATE : -- LEWIS HOES - ERSHIP
J BY:
-12-
b
I.
-14-
--@
Y . C
-17-
. .
-18-
-19-
9 2 I I 9 0 0 u s 7
-20-
I I 2 9 0 0 0 3 7
t 1 1 I
I I I I
1 . -.
Owner Rcprcscnbtivc 1 Sub Total I I
0 S u b c o x r c t o r . SRS 33.030
,
4. The contactor asd c x h sub:m:arto: shrll k::p or CBUS: to b t Ixp! zn atcurate rtrcrd showing the nm:. the occtlpzijon 2;ij h e a:rurl pzr &:n, uaz:s 2nd b : x f : s prid IO c x h worknzn cmployd by him i n ccanccion with the public work.
5. Thc reco:d must be op:n at dl rrsanzble hours IO L'C inspstion of th t public body z u r d i n g thc contract, and its ofic:rs 2nd zg:n:s. A copy of ~4: rxo rd for ct:h cd~end2r mod! r n x t bc scnl lo the IsbDr commissiom and the public'body awarding the COWa~t no l a w thzn 1 uc:k zfier the :ni! of:hc month. Th: COP)' rncst b: 0%" lo public ics?xlion as providtd in NRS 239.010. Th: r::ord in the psl:ssion of t'le p 5 l i c b d y rwardins the cor;tnct mzy bc disczrdcd 5). 5: public be$ I p a t afrcr find pzp:r,t is nrde by the pxb!ic body 5: ik pablic WO:~.
6. .4ny contrjclor or sab:ontrartor, or q:nt or r:p::stntrtiv: thcrcof, doing public u-o;k who n:glects,to cornply with thc p:~v3io::s of this s:ction is y i l r y of L Gisdrmcrnor. . . .. .. - .
RETERY Th'IS FLPORT TO THE OFFICE OF THE SE\'.4D.4 SLATE L.4BOR COh1~1ISSIOSER
-23-
10.00 10.00 9.00 17.00 20.4100 10.00 10.00 9.00 17.00
1.00 11.00 1I.5S00 5.00 13.0
10.09 10.00 9.09 29,W 11.5500 10.00 10.00 9.00 ?I. W
10.00 10.00 1.00 29.00 I7.UCO 10.00 10.00 9.00 n.oo
5.00 8.00 11.8100 5.00 8.00
5.00 11.00 19.b100 5.00 11.00
5.00 5.00 lt.bS00 1.00 17.5300
5*00 13.00
-2"
755.17 755.17 7% I 1
1 W.17
13.19 2?7.89 ?21.89
1 60.61
5Ob.17 500.17 S08.17
8 x w ?
$08.47 SOL11 308.11 500.3
I1E.O IW.48 190.48
a 904.78
255. I 9 111.19 155.19
1 116.31
98.15 ll0.?4 210.19 118. 31
8 &bI.$I
I0 10.00 121.87 124.74
1 2.11 114.46 474.01
b 1.bl 106.62 401.15 10 10.00
?* 14.51 :93.11 711.07 10 10.00
6 1.61 116.01 511.48 10 10.00
s 4 m
m
-. c 0 * N
2 e 1
c
f W
... N
f
8
9 s
mo
9 s
'0,
-0
-.
0.
-0,
? t
f
'0,
0,:
ZZ
..
00
-.
h:
c-
-- -- e. '
PC
.
.
w .o c -
ss
?
=
s=
cc
Zf
00
,
8s
S
?
98.
cc
001
'0
0
--
=s
.n
m
8s
do
mm
ss PI
mt
n
s? m
m
mm
m
m
N
N
c
rs 1
OVERTIME
. .
1: -I
Name
Class.
Name
Class.
Name
;lass.
Jame
;lass. I I 1 EQUIPMENT - WPE. SUE & MODEL I
I ... ATERIALS (DESCRIPTION AND QUANTTTY)
. . .
I 1 uA
.. .
-28- '
Subject: Angel Park Outlet and Outfall Change Order Request #4 - Explanation of Quantity Additions
Gentlemen:
The change order request has various line item quantities that were increased to the contract. The reasons are as follows:
1) Contract Line Item #2 Basin Excavation - original quantity - 39,000 CY
increase quantity = 4.960 Total - 43,960 % increase = 12.7%
-
-
The contractor supplied G. C. Wallace (GCW) with survey data for the original grade and excavated area to back-up their quantity. GCW performed a takeoff of the design drawings using the AGTEK earthwork software and found that our quantity figure was higher than their request. We have to assume that the difference from the prebid design calculation was that the 'rip- rap area may not have been considered as an added excavation. The finished grade was to the top of the rip-rap. Thus, the excavated volume would have to take into consideration the depth of the rock; also, the existing conditions required field modifications.
2) Contract Line Item #3 Channel Excavation - original quantity = 126,026 CY
increase quantity = 3.1 10 Total - 129,136 % increase = 0.25%
-
The contractor supplied volumes of survey data of which we spot checked. This quantity is well within reason for an increase due to calculation variation.
3) Contract Line Item #4 Channel Trapezoid Concrete - original quantity = 7,746.0 CY
Add for channel realign C.O. #1 - 24.5 Add for ramp removal C.O. #2 - 3 17.7 Delete for ramp removal C.O. #2 = <347.6> .
Sub-total - 7,740.6
- -
-
Actual calculated = 8,406.0 Difference - 665.4 CY -
The amount over contract = 8,406 - 7,746 = 660 CY __ 9% increase - 8.5% -
-30-
G.C. WALLACE, INC.
The final calculations were performed by the contractor and by two GCW personnel (Dan Nesbitt and myself) during the progress of the work. I also recalculated them for this report which resulted in a higher figure by about 50 cubic yards. I am satisfied that the pay quantity is accurate and should remain the same. The design group that calculated the pre-bid quantities stated that the difference may be that they had first used a square foot measure. The City then requested that GCW convert to a cubic yard by using six (6 ) inches for an overall thickness; GCW mistakenly did not consider the two foot cutoff that runs along the channel.
4) Contract Line Item #8 Transition Structure Concrete - original quantity - 327 CY
increase quantity = a Total - 357 %increase = 9.2%
-
-
The quantity is correct. We had to use the design drawings and an as-built situation that was not detailed on the drawings. The detail did not indicate how to transition from a 2:l slope to a vertical wall with respect to the two (2) feet cut-off wall edge. We decided to Ieave the thick edge until the slope was 1:l then use only the vertical wall thickness.
5 ) Contract Line Item #25 6' chain link fence - original quantity - 15,200.00 -
Add for channel realign C.O. #1 - 44.00 ' .
Delete fence at school C.O. #3 = < 1,295.28> Delete fence at new development = < 1,600.00>
-
Add fence to previous deleted development - 946.00 Sub-total - 13,294.72 Actual measure add - = 5 8 2 . 2 8
- -
Total project 13,877.00
The total quantity measured = 13,877; thus, we needed to add 582.28 LF to the sub-total. The total amount is less than the plan quantity, the amount shown is the actual field measured quantity as per the contract pay requirement. This appears bard to follow due the way the change orders were handled on this project. Normally, the quantities are accumulated and rectified at the end of the project. However, it was decided in the beginning of the project to use deleted quantities to offset contract changes. This was done in order to expedite the project. In order to pay properly, you need to pay the full line item value, then deduct on the change order.
-31-
- -
G.C. WALLACE, INC.
6) Contract Line Item #31 Temporary Turtle Fence - original contract = 12,360
Add for channel realign C.O. #1 = 367 12,727
Add for replacement of existing - = 2.641 15,368
Sub-total = -
Actual measured = 15,368 LF. The extra is due to the, existing turtle fence. It was to remain in tack, however, the project w& within the channel construction area; thus, it had to be removed and replaced.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
a Sincerely,
G.C. WALLACE, INC
Proj ct anager
-32-
HIGHWAY 168 B LAWSON DRIVE, BOX 570, MOAPA, NEVADA 89025 - TELEPHONE 864-2232
June 17, 1992
Meadow Valley Contractors 2905 W. Carey Las Vegas, Nevada 89030
ATTN : Donna Stickler
SUBJECT: Cost Breakdown on Hoe Ram ti Excavator
Dear Donna,
In reference to your question regarding the Hoe Ram charges that were specified in my letter dated February 4, 1992, these rates were taken from the Rental Rate Blue Book and were based on a monthly rental rate figure. I have enclosed our Cashman invoices f o r our actual costs.
If you have any further questions please l e t me know.
HOERAM COST
HOERAM
JULY '91 AUG '91 SEPT '91 OCT '91
TOTAL
$11 , 044 $ 8,500 $ 8,500 $ 3,668 $31 , 712 11-1-11 111-1111
($5 I 715) HOE USED ONSITE FOR 1/2MONTH
$25 I 997 111-1911 11111111
-35-
I TAXES; . - TAX CLARK 240100
I
ORIGINAL
-36-
10 :
INVOICL
SOLD TO: r R O N ~ E W I S C O N S T R U C T I ~ ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE NET DUE A P.0, BOX 57 woAPA NV 89025 .
. . I o 6 / 1 1 / 9
MK MODEL BERIAL NUMBER CT 2258 3YD01096
I
400C(OO
24000 I
t** TOTAL TAXES ***
I I
. .
ORIGINAL
-37-
-38-
, ...
-39-
. _
-40 -
. --
I
mao TO:
r f
-41-
\ T A X E S 8 TAX CLARK
I
- 42 -
~
R O N LEWIS CONSTRUCTION TERMS: ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE /? p NET DUE AT B E G I N N I N G
R O A P A N V 89025 SEE RENTAL AGREEMENT P . 0 , B O X 5 7 OF R E N T A L PERIOD, !.-. i
RENTAL PERXOD 0 9 / 1 0 / 9 1 TO 1 0 / 0 9 / 9 1 ’ -1 M m
0- . .. . . I . - I
I I I
-43-
RON LEWI S CONST
- I
- 4 4 -
R O N LEWIS CONSTRUCT!ON ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYAbClC t , . , I
Y,O, eox 5 7 . ; :.;q . * I
HOAPA NV 8 9 0 2 5
R E N T A L PERIOD 1 0 / 2 4 / 9 1 TO 1 1 / 0 9 / 9 1
TU P A R T I A L L Y CREDIT INVOICE MO, A 0 7 3 9 5 0 5
10: 4
I
L
AXILS: 'LAX C L A P h
.. .
ORIGINAL
-46-
ATTNi ACCOUNTS PAYABL6
WOAPA N V 89025 P.O. aox 57 @CT 2 8 1991
RENTAt PERIOD 1 0 / 2 4 / 9 1 TO 1 1 / 0 9 / 5 I I I W I n e T M .
***** C R E D I T M E M 0 ***I* TO P A R T Z A t L Y CREDIT INVOICE N O , A 0 7 3 9 2 0 5
ORIGINAL
-47 -
..
YY
Y
X
x
x
.
C.k m W
car
il-oc(-Ol 213 x 17-(M-@I 200 X
24-(M-01 218 25-Od-01 217
2o-Oc(-Ol 221 x
O l - N a - @ I 224 x 31-(M-o1 223 x
OS-Nor-01 226 X W-Nor-@l 229 x 07-Nor-01 2J0 O(-NOv-@l 2Jl 12-Nor-01 2J5 X 14-Nor-01 237 X
10-NOr-Dl 241 (I-Nor-01 238 x
20-od-a 220
20-Nor-@l 243
26-Na-01 240 X 22-Nor-01 245
27-Nor-@l 2SO 2O-NOV-@l 240 X
OJ-D.c-mt 2# 04-D.e-@l 297 OS-D.C-@l 2 s x W-DOC-01 2 s 0o-o.S-el 282 10-0.e-@1 2e¶ x ll-D.c-@l 204 x 12-ao-01 205
r e - a o - n 2 w l a -be -@t me x
17-bC-Sl 270
IO-NW-OI m a
to-o.o-m~ 271 l@-ao-@l 272 2O-D.c-@l 273 at -OW-@I 204 02-Jmn-02 PI8 x W-Jm-02 190 03-h-02 207 X
07-Jmn42 2W O l - J M - Q m W-Jan-02 zof
13-Jn-02 2@7 1 0 - h - Q 204
14-An-02 1w l¶-J.n-Q 190 18-Jan-@ SO0
-49-
RON LEWIS ADMINISTRATION COSTS
RON LEWIS HOERAM COSTS $25,997
ADMIN @ 10% $ 2,600
based on R.S. Means range from 5% to 22% with an average of 12%
-50-
- .
P, 0. 60X 1200, BULLHEAD CITY, ARIZONA 86430 - TELEPHONE (602) 754-3141
U
. . . . . . . *. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :, :... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ?. 3 . .
. . . . . . . . .
&!.:- '.'.!:JOB*.# .' . '
. . '1 ' ' CUSTOMER P. 0. NO. ('WORK ORMR NO. I I
SUPtRlNTENDiNT ,I, . . s r t c l A L : ~ E ~ . . . . . .;' . . . I
I 6-27-91 TRAUSPORT TO SPRIKG MOUN.AIK
9-09-9 1 TRANSPORT TO ANGEL PARK I
9-16-91 T W S P O R T TO ANGEL PAN<
9-20-91 T M S P O R T TO SPRING MOUNTAIN
9-23-91 TFNSPORT TO A S E L P A W i
I I i
I l I
I
i
1 1
l / 1 1
I I I i 1
I i
I
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
$ 500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
c I 1 Toto1 P r i m $3,000.00 1
I Ploaso rrturn ytllaw 1 0s mor 30 days old aro subject to a r4nicr chargo of 1H% par month I Copy with your rtmittoncr . ..,I --- to TOPY y * u
L ' ' d
-51-
Fencing SpecrlaMs Inc. 4500 Walnut Road. Suite A
Phone (702) 644-3750 - FAX: (702) 644-6257 Lic. MOO20564
da;3ip. No. La5 Vegas, Nevada 89031
INVOICE
,on. OESCRlPTlON
Sto@ c o n s t r u c t i o n of 6' hi$h chain l i n k fencinu five separate area. Sotn s ide cE channel approxicmtely 300' short of headwz1.f~ a t :ake !'e55 an2 Vegcs G:L'ivc.
10 trips - 5 trips to job site zn5 5 triss k c k m c o n s t r u c t i o n y a d . Z hours - 3 ;;rn G 112.50.
PLEASE PAY FROM THIS INVOICE
MEADOW VALLEY PAGE 61
GENERAL WILDING AND GENERAL ENGINEERING
( 3 . 13. WallAca. Inc. Enpina~rinP/Archi , tecture 1555 S. Rainbow Blvd. La6 Vegas. Nevada 89192
Attention: Michael R. h n n i n n . F . E . . P r ~ ~ i e c t Maneuer
Please call m a i f further informat,ion is required.
Sincerely youra, MEAMW VALLEY CONTHACTORS. I N C .
A
Dbnna S t i c k l e r Pmject Superintendent
-53-
GENERAL BUILDING AND GENERAL ENGINEERING
June 17, 1992 P.O. BOX 12 1. MOAPA. NV 89025 TELEPHONE 702464-2575
FAX 70246d-251)O
Donna Stickler Project manager Lake Mead Detention Basin MVCI Project No 9161
Dear Donna:
During the winter of 1991/1992 we had planned to use our 225 Cat Backhoe for the construction of 3 retaining walls and bridge abutments for t w o bridges on the NDOT Project IDR-015-1(90)39 Spring Mountain I/lS Traffic Interchange. It w a s not available as planned due to delays on the Angel Park Project. I am not. entirely familiar with the Angel Park Project delays or what caused them but I wish to inform you that we were severely inconvenienced because of it.
We had two bridges to construct at the same time and had to rent a large backhoe from our subcontractor Ron Lewis Construction much of the time. This was at a considerable cost to the project, since we had to furnish equipment to Ron Lewis Construction for reimbursement at a very disadvantaged position.
If you wish for me to provide cost documentation please call me at 702-794-2478.
Sincerely Yours;
i L l . “Jacob N. Jessop Project Superintendent
_,IDOW VALLEY COHTRACTORS
- 5 5 -
lEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS
TOTAL J+,?I2.?5
-56-
'YEttT COST REFORT !LAKE HEaD. JDB NO. 9 1 b l
L m VEGA;. NEVADA HDS' 1?91
-57-
rlEADllU VbLLEY COHTRbCTORS
- 5 8 -
T O T A L
-59-
. . I . , . .. > . .
EQUIPRENT COST REPORt '- '.', - \, , :' ' ., .
CAREYlLAKE HEAD. JOB b, 91bl , . ,
FEB 1992 LAS .VE6AS, HEVADA ' ' I , , '. . . .': ' . . . .
-60- TOTAL
a
BARRICADING FOR CULVERTS
BARRICADES AUG 91 $1,360 SEPT 91 $5,340 OCT 91 $5,700 NOV 91 $4,530 DEC 91 $3,300 JAN 92 $3,410 FEB 92 $3,410
$27,050
I N u) I
I .
highway rentals inc.
' . t' I
.. -....
1:
'.. . .
. . . . . ' _ 30 D-ays" .- O v e r n i g h t half s t r c c t c l o s u r e L a k e Mcad and
Pionc<?z S e p t . 26 t h r o u g h Oct. 25, 1991.
E O v c r n i g h t half s t r e e t c l o s u r c a t Smokc Ranch 30 Days
2,400.C 80.00 . :.e? :..:.. . . .. ,
0.. ..
. . . . . 1,650.( 5 5 . 0 0 and Pioneer S e p t . 26 t h r o u g h Oct. 25, 1991 . 1 . _ - . . - . . .
30 Days + ' ' - : , L O v e r n i g h t h a l f s t r e e t c l o s u r e Vegas Dr. and '..' -8- ' . ' .
, . ..-- * .
- ;.. . ' - .
- _ . P o i n c e r S c p t . 26 t l lrouy,h Oct. 2 5 , 1 9 9 1 . , 55.00 ii 1, h50.C .. .
-
highway rentals inc.
5005 E. CAREY AVENUE LAS VEGAS NEVADA 891 15 (702) 453-1616
r N A M E Meadow Valley Contracting S 7 ADDRESS
4640 E . Elwood, S u i t e 2 0
CITY Phoenix, AZ 85040 0 LCONTACf
ZIP PHONE
F INVOICE DATE DATE SHIPPEO SALESMAN PURCHASE ORDER NO SHIP VIA
, 11-25-91 KD OUANTITY UNIT PRICE DESCRIPTION S I Z E AMOUN r
Provide Traffic Control for City of Las Vegas
Angel Park o u t l e t and outfa l l C91.1730.1 .
14 Days - Overnight half s t r e e t c l o s u r e Lake Mad and
Pioneer October 26 through November 8 , 1991 $1,12L. - t J $80.00
31 Days Overnight hal f s treet c losure a t Smoke Ranch
and Pioneer October 26 through Novcmber 2 5 , 199. $1,705.00 $35.00
II I I II " t I
I I I I - A LATE CHARGE OF l'A% PER MONTH CHARGE0 ON PAST DUE BALANCE.
I n tnr rrrnl 1ha1 I( nwnmrt n a r * % w r y h r sa11at to r r l m n an mtwnrv n,*lrr In nmlmca ~ n r I I ! ' l i Irm. na,wl or mcnW.ct nn" t t m q d m nr*nmfr* qrllr, %hall Dr rnhllrq IO$ a t 4 D l r r r thall p.r, rnllrctm rml% rltnnrv t 1r.q ana ~ n u t l cmtq -hrtnr, I* MI wd 8% l#lrl
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTALS
RENTAL SALES lAX
$4 IC I-
.. ... . . :, , - 6 6 -
1 , s Iz E l*Ull,CllASF OnDI.11 110
IIWOICE DAlE ShLESI.IAtt 12-25-9 1 K I )
OUANTITY D E S C R I P T I O N UtttT PRICE
suo rorAL SALES TAX
SUOTOlALS
highway rentals inc.
5005 E. CAREY AVENUE LAS VEGAS NEVADA 091 15 (702) 453-1616
r N A M E Mcndow Valley Contractin!: s
ADDRESS 4640 I:. Elwood, Suite 2 - -. b ADDRESS 0 Phoenix, A Z . 85040 T
CITY e o T Y
ZIP 0
LCONTACT 71” .._ PHONE
L
JNVOICE DAIE OATE SHIPPED SALESMAN P u n c I ~ ~ s r onom NO. SHIP VIA
1-25-92 K.D. I
OUANTITY UNIT PRICE DESCRIPTION SIZE -
AMCUtII
Provide Traffic Control f o r City of Las Vegss
Angcl Park Outlet 3lld Outfall 391.1730.1. -
31 Days Overnight h a l f s t r e e t c losure at, Smoke Ranch and Pioncer. Ik*c. 26 to Jan. 25, 1992. 1,705. a 55.00
31 Days Ovcrllight 11al1 s t r c c t c l o s u r e a t Vegns Dr. and
Piol lecr. Ucc. 2 6 t o Jon. 25, 1 9 3 2 . 1,795.00 55.00
/, # . . - / I .I( I3 u c-/ (..
yo 1 3 1 I
I
CjO /I
I d i T r!\ 9 ,
A’;!-/\\ !t 1. $ 8 I , , ._,
ROVED BY -’I 1 J 7 - ;. ..- ) 2...
” J .,<+ . . . . . -- ~~ ~
“ a : ,I.; i
ACCOUfll NUMOER AUOUNT ACCOUN r ~IUMOEA AUOUfIl ACCOUNT NUhtflCn AMOUfJT
400- 9 3,410.00
. _- .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .., I,,, . “.“I :: I ! I
GENERAL BUILDING AND GENERAL ENGINEERING,’
P.O. BOX 121, MOAPA. NV 89025 TELEPHONE 702-864-2575
FAX 702-864-2580
A p r i l 27. 1992
G. C. Wal lace , Inc . Engineering,/Architecture 1555 S. Rainbow Blvd. Las Vegas. Nevada 89102
At ten t ion : Michae l R . h n n i n g , F . E . . P r o j e c t Manager
RE: Ang,el Park Outlet & O u t f a l l - B i d No. 91.1730.1 Estra Mobi l i za t ion - Paving
Dear Mr. Dunning:
Ron Lewis’ c o s t -- MVCI overheadiprof it
$671.71
S i n c e r e l y y o u r s . MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS. I N C . n
i);nna- S t i c k l e r P ro jec t Supe r in t enden t
-70-
MEADOW VALLEY ADMINISTRATION COSTS
MEADOW VALLEY TOTAL COST INCLUDING SUB-CONTRACTOR = $ 83,156.71 $ 8,315.67 ADMIN @ 10% - -
SUB-TOTAL = $ 91,472.38 ,
9. Name, title, office location and Nevada registration number of professional engineers resident on staff to be in direct responsible supervision of the work.
a.
b.
C.
10. List locations of other offices (no more that five):
Address Telephone No. of Personnel
C.
11. Errors and Omissions Jnsurance:
a. Amount your firm presently carries: $
b. Carrier’s name and address:
e. If no insurance, state other arrangements:
RFPDraftPage-6-
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CHANNEL - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (HEN.03.B.92)
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
STAFF: Approve.
TECHNICAL COMMI?TEE: Approve.
CITIZENS COMMITTEE: Approve.
RFCD AGENDA
Date: 10/8/92
CLARK COUNTY
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
I SUBJECT: Union Pacific Railroad Channel City Contract #91-92*33 Change Order #1 I I PETITIONER: City of Henderson
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: Approve Change Order #1 ~~
FISCAL IMPACT: Not to exceed $76,550.00
BACKGROUND: Slope paving for this contract was bid as part of the additive bid schedule at $33.75 per square yard. Additive bid schedule was not awarded with the original contract because the actual quantities for slope paving were not known. Upon excavation of the channel, a number of adjacent blockwalls were found to have shallow foundations which dictated the need for a stem wall and slope paving at a slope of 1 : 1.
Respectfully submined,
I@kk T. Calhoun, P.E. Director of Public Works
SUA:jn September 15, 1992
TAC AGENDA RFCD AGENDA
Date: 9/24/92 Date: 10/8/92 I . I
Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: I Date: 9/16/92
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CHANNEL - CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 (HEN.03.B.92)
The City of Henderson has negotiated a change order for the Union Pacific Railroad Channel project. Upon excavation of the channel, a number of adjacent block walls were found to have shallow footings. The change order represents the addition of slope paving and stem walls to protect the block walls. The net increase to the construction contract for Change Order Number 1 is $76,550.00. Current interlocal contract funding is sufficient to cover the increase.
Staff Recommendation:
Approve.
~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee: AGENDA # 9 Date: 9/24/92
Recommendation:
Approve.
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee: E # 9 Date: 9/28/92
Recommendation:
Approve.
C.C. WALLACE, INC. EngineeringIArchitecture
504.385
September 3, 1992
City of Henderson 240 Water Street Henderson, Nevada 89015
Attention: Mr. George Nelson Quality Control
G.C. WALLACE, P E , TCRKILI 8. A W I M S CALVIN L. BLACK. P.E LAMES A. DUDDLESTEN, P,E
LACK H MITCHELL, PE. DAVID HUCKLE. PE.
MICHAEL D. ROSS. PE
MARIE RAINWATER RONALD R. THOMAS
CIiRISTOI’ItFR W ANDERS
MICHAEL 1. CSIZMADIA. P.E. 1. STEVtN ANDERSON. PE
C. RUSSELL DAVIS. 5.C H a V A R D L. HARRIS. PE D O N A L D A. HASELHOFF. P.E. MARC A. LEMOINE. ARCHl lECl SCOTT R PLUMMER. P.E. HOWARD K. VANDER MEER. P.E.
IIM MKKEDAHL. P.E RICHARD C. CLARKE IEFFREY I. FREIBERG. P.E. ALLEN L. HACfN. PI5 DOUGW M. HANKEL ROBERT I. HERMAN R U L H. ICIDD, PC. KRlSTOlER D. KORPl MARVIN W. MAIZE NEAL I PRICE. R E
KAT1 I Y R $MI71 I, P,E. IFFIFRY W. STAYION. I!E. RICHARD SlRlJ lZ IOHN R 1OBIN. PE. H U N D R A 1. VANCE, CCS
BENWMIN c. SMIIII, Pr..
Subject: Union Pacific Railroad Channel Slope Paving
Gentlemen:
Please find attached a set of design drawings for the Union Pacific Railroad Channel with the limits of the needed slope paving indicated. As mentioned in the meeting held on September 3, 1992 at the COH offices, the approximate quantity of slope paving needed is 1800 square yards. Approximately 400 linear feet of a 1-foot high stem will also be needed. The limits of the stemwall are also indicated on the attached plans. A sketch is attached showing typical sections for the slope paving.
If we may be of any assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
Noel C. Laughlin Senior Designer
cb
Attachment
PC Ron Riggs - Max Riggs Construction Co. &
EN-3N
3/66
* - -
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT: ~~ ~~~ ~
GOWAN DETENTION BASIN OUTFALL PROJECT (STIMSON CHANNEL) - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 (NLV.04.A.89)
STAFF:
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
To be given at the meeting.
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: To be heard at the Special Technical Advisory Committee Meeting at 150 p.m., October 7, 1992
RFCD AGENDA
Date: 10/8/92
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
Approve Contract Change Order No. 3 for the Gowan Detention Basin Outfall Structure Project, Schedule " B (Stimson Channel).
PETITIONER: 1 Gary W. Holler, P.E., Director of Public Works
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve Contract Change Order No. 3 for modifications to the Gowan Detention Basin Outfall Structure Project, Schedule "B".
FISCAL IMPACT: $132,840
BACKGROUND:
Significant fissuring in the Stimson Channel portion of the Gowan Outfall Project has recently been discovered. VTN Nevada Consulting Engineers has recommended a mitigation plan which requires modification to the existing construction contract with Las Vegas Paving Corporation.
Change Order No. 3 will afford the remedy for the geotechnical problems encountered during field explorations.
Regional Flood Control District AGENDA ITEM DEVELOPMENT
Staff Discussion: I Date: 9/30/92
GOWAN DETENTION BASIN OUTFALL PROJECT (STIMSON CHANNEL) - CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 (NLV.04.A.89)
The City of North Las Vegas has negotiated a change order for the Gowan Detention Basin Outfall Structure (Stimson Channel) project. The change order includes mitigation for the fissuring encountered in the project. The net increase to the construction contract for Change Order Number 3 is $132,840.00. District funding is sufficient to cover the change order amount.
This item is scheduled to be heard at the Special Technical Advisory Committee meeting at 150 p.m. on October 7, 1992.
Staff Recommendation:
To be given at the meeting.
Discussion by Technical Advisory Committee:
Recommendation:
. .
Discussion by Citizens Advisory Committee:
Recommendation:
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS EN-G DEPARTMENT
SEPTEMBER 18,1992
8
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
PROJECT: GOWANDETENTIONBASIN OUTFALL STRUCTURE
CONTRACTOR LAS VEGAS PJWING CORPORATION REQUESTEDPIY: CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS
SCH. "B" - STMSON -ION CHANNElr
YOU arrs hereby directed to p d o m the fbllodng descr;ibed mljc not included in the pZans and spedcatiom for this pmbct:
1 Bid Item 8 - €Issum cjhannel Section - 100 LX x $160 (bid amount) #ls,ooO.00 474 LS. x $160 (requhd) 7tt840.M)
DiBEmnce $59,840.00*
ll Addtional cast aftransition sfructure $~,oo0.00*
llL Fabric under channel $1 6,000.00*
&@ qz (daw
n careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, fumish all materials, except as may otherwise be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work specified, and will accept as full payment therefor the prices shown.
120, dam extension of time will be allowed after prorated adjustment by reason of this proposed change order.
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
ADVERTISING SERVICES CONSULTANT’S REPORT
STAFF: Receive the report.
RFCD AGENDA
Date: 10/8/92
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
SUBJECT: FLOOD AWARENESS PROGRAM CONSULTANT STATUS
PETITIONER:
VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD RECEIVE A REPORT FROM MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON REGARDING ADVERTISING SERVICES PROVIDED AND DIRECT STAFF OR THE CONSULTANT, IF DEEMED APPROPRIATE.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The Board awarded a contract for advertising services to Merica, Burch and Dickerson on February 13, 1992 and requested that the consultant make a report to the Board after six full months of progress. The major portion of the work has been completed, as outlined in the attached summary. A monthly update report on the overall program, including the work being accomplished by District staff, continues to be included as part of the Project Status Report agenda item.
A representative of the firm will present the highlights of their work and can answer any questions the Board may have. No action is necessary, however, the Board may direct staff or the consultant, if deemed appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
ITEM #11
General ManagerKhief Engineer
Clark County Regional l-. . A Control District Status Report as of September 29, 1992
Item Status
Outdoor Posters including the 14’ x 48’ outdoor board which changes Continue to place posters at new locations each month,
displayed during this campaign will go up in location every two months. The last of the 1 13 posters
September.
Milk Cartons Approximately 1 million milk cartons with the flood message were printed and distributed throughout a l l of Southern Nevada by Anderson Dairy in May
Fox 5 Kids Club Promotional spots continue to run as part of the sponsorship of this childrens organization and will through September. A total of more than 300 spots, 12 per week for six months, directly targeted at children will have aired when this promotion concludes.
Newspaper Wrappers 2 million plastic bags have been delivered to the Review Journal. A portion of them have been put into use for commercial delivery. The vast majority will land on local doorsteps as soon as it rains.
Skyview Traffic Reports Reports continue every other week. A total of 792 messages, 72 every other week for 22 weeks, will have been broadcast over some 20 radio stations by the time this promotion ends.
Brochure and delivered to CCRFCD in late July. The brochures 20,000 four-color brochures were redesigned, printed
opportunities and general inquiries. will be used for school appearances, various display
Television Flood Safety Message A total of 170 paid and donated commercials ran in Placement and Production May and early June. Half of the spots were donated by
various television stations who matched each paid spot with a free one.
Next Step - Program ends October 5th
- None, job completed
- Program ends October 1st
- Waiting for rain
- None, program completed
None, job completed
-
None, job completed
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTIVITY REPORT
STAFF:
~ ~~
RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY
Receive the report.
RFCD AGENDA ITEM#9 Date: 10/8/92
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
SUBJECT:
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTIVITY REPORT
PETITIONER:
MANNY GOMEZ, CHAIRMAN, CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
THAT THE BOARD RECEIVE A REPORT FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON 1992 ACTIVITIES
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The Chairman of the Regional Flood Control District Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), Mr. Manny Gomez, will make a presentation on the Citizens Advisory Committee’s goals established for 1992, and the accomplishments that have transpired to date.
The agenda backup includes three items completed and adopted by the CAC: 1) a mission statement; 2) an outline of Committee responsibilities; and 3) an orientation package developed for distribution to new CAC members.
Also included is a list of recommendations adopted by the CAC as a means to further reach the public regarding information on CAC meetings.
Respectfully submitted,
flw / Mdnny Gbde
TAC AGENDA rrEM #
RFCD AGENDA
Date: 10/8/92 Date: ITEMU9
Chairkn, Citizens Advisoq-Committee
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMllTEE MISSION STATEMENT
It is the mission of this Committee to represent the public interest by advising and conferring with the Board of Directors on Regional Flood Control matters in the District.
Adopted 4/3/92
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMllTEE RESPONSIBILITIES
1) Members are asked to review the agenda prior to the meeting.
2) In order to be an effective member, regular attendance is necessary.
3) The Board has requested that the CAC members play a productive role in the Flood Awareness Week Program.
4) Each member should identify a contact person in their respective jurisdiction with whom they can discuss items of special interest.
Adopted 3/2/92
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMllTEE ORIENTATION PACKAGE
Annual Report Policies and Procedures Uniform Regulations for the Control of Drainage '
Nevada Revised Statutes - 543 Current Year Meeting Schedule Flood Terms and Definitions Public Information Program Manual Ten Year Pian CAC Member List (Roster) TAC Member List (Roster) Board Member List Profile of District Project Community Rating System Information
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PUBLIC OUTREACH ACTIVITIES
1 ) List CAC meeting dates in newspaper community activity calendars.
2) List CAC meeting dates in radio and TV community activity calendars.
3) Have a listing of CAC meeting dates developed and included as an extra sheet in the District brochure.
At the request of the CAC, District staff has issued press releases to the various media organizations to comply with request numbers 1 and 2. Staff also prepared and printed the requested brochure insert for distribution.
Adopted 8/31 /92
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
AGENDA ITEM
SUBJECT:
PROJECT STATUS REPORTS
PETITIONER:
VIRGINIA VALENTINE, P.E., GENERAL MANAGERKHIEF ENGINEER
s s RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER:
THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The following Projects Status Reports for the month of September 1992 are submitted for your
review :
92/93 PROJECT LIST AND BOND PROJECTS
a) Project Charts b) Project Summary Sheets c) Clark County d) City of Las Vegas e) City of Henderson f ) City of North Las Vegas g) City of Boulder City
OTHER PROJECTS OF INTEREST
a) Clark County - Hiko Springs Remapping b) City of Las Vegas - Gowan North Channel c) Henderson - Pittman Wash Phase I1 d) Regional Flood Control District
Respectfully submitted,
TAC AGENDA
Date: 1018192 Date: ITEM # 10 ITEM # RFCD AGENDA
Add442Ad Catherine A. Razor Project . . . Administration CFrdinaJor- . - - - - .. . . . - _ - . . -- ---
CLARK COUNTY PROJECT STATUS CHART AS OF 9/30/92
DUCK CREEK BRIDGES
E RANGE WASH DETENTION BASIN
FLAMINGO BRIDGE @ PALOS VERDE
FLAMINGO BRIDGE @ PARADISE
WINNICK AVE IMPROV
RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Annie Oakley to Palm
Mtn Vista, Pecos, Sandhill Tomiyasu,Annie Oakley, Peral,Mojave
SLOAN CHANNEL
TROPICANA DETENTION BASIN
VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM
VAN BUSKIRK RIGHT-OF-WAY .
I992 1993 1994
lul Aug Sop lOct Nov Doc Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob I
I I I I
X
P
m
CITY OF LAS VEGAS PROJECT STATUS CHART 1993 1994
AS OF 9I30192 Jul Aug Sop loct Nov Doc Jan Fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob I
ALTA STORM DRAIN (Meadow VI
ANGEL PARK DB EXPANSION I I I
BUFFALO CHANNE~(Doe-Westcliffff) wHHHaHHHMHHHHHHHA=- BUFFALO CH(Summerlin-Vegas)
BUFFALO CH(Westc1iff-Summedin)
w//* : CHEYENNE CHANNEL
CAREYILAKE MEAD DET. BASIN
GOWANICAM 10 & LONE MTN
GOWAN DETENTION BASIN
I
I I I I I I I I I I
I
. , . . . GOWAN OUTFALL 1 OAKEY BL DET BASIN SYSTEM
OAKEY COLLECTION SYSTEM
WASHINGTONISANDHILL-VIRGIL w// WASHINGTONISANDHILL OUTLET
WASHINGTON AVE. ROW
v///& I WASHINGTON AVE. SYSTEM DESIGN
WHH&H”#/Hrn#H .: :. , ’ ’ . . RAMPART STORM DRAIN
I
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
I I I I I I I I I I 1
-3-
PROJECTSTATUSCHART AS OF 9/30/92
BOULDER CITY HEMENWAY WASH
HENDERSON C-1 CHANNEL SYSTEM
PllTMAN WASH - PHASE 111
SUNSET DETENTION BASIN
UPRR CHANNEL
MESQUITE TOWN WASH DET. BASIN
NORTH LAS VEGAS GOWAN OUTFALL-PHASE I
KYLE CANYON DET. BASIN
NLV DETENTION BASIN-OUTLET
UPPER LV WASH DET BASIN
WEST RANGE WASH DIKE
BID PERIOD . ~ c o N s T R u c T I o N
-4 -
XARK COUNTY luck Creek Bridges (Tomiyasu & I
$353,000
Jerde
Shading indicates Bond funded woject . .
$8,620,000
$2,820,000
see abow
see above
$8,000,000
see above
see above
$200,000
Another month delay for right-of-way on ~ ~ ~~~
NOW 12/92 01 I93 DONE DONE DONE
'01 /94 DONE
DONE DONE DONE DONE project delay for preparation of a hydraulic model
NOW 12/92 d + 4 3/93 d+4 9/93 d + 4 L
$ 1,985,485 DONE DONE NOW 09/92
see above DONE DONE 10192 03/93
see above NOW 11/92 02/93 06/93
See phases I I I I I ........ ...I ............. NOW 111192 (02/93
I I 09/93 I
Imt scheduled yet I .......................... ....... .. ................. 1/93 d+l
1/93 d+l .......................... ROW 12/92 d + l
02193 1 month construction start delay for special
04/93 sod Inveshaahon
04/93 1 month delay to coincide with Phase IV
09/93
. . . .
d + indicates cumulative delay in months since 6/30/92
-5-
. *
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL I DESIGN STRICT SUMMARV SHEET AS OF START
I I I IDONE ioodsprings Flood Control I I inprovements $303,000 NOW liko Springs Channel-Lwghlin
cogan Wash Div X l - Moapa
logan Wash Div. X2 - Moapa 4
I $800,000 DONE
b d d y River West Levee - Moapa
lelson flood Control Improvements NOW
;aarchlight flood Control VnDrovementr $346.000 NOW lnnsmed Wash Improvements -
$4,100,000 54,100,000 DONE indicates Bond funded
DESIGN CONSTR CONSTR SCHEDULE CHANGE FROM PREVIOUS COMPLETE START DATE COMPL DATE MONTH
DATE I
DONE 112/92 d + l 102193 I I I lpreviour construction schedule was
n date was for
09/92 d + 2 09/93 12193 delay for SID & EPA req'd mitigation plan
DONE 12/93 d + 4 111193 d+4 d + indicates cumulative delay in months since 6/30/92
-6-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL I DESIGN DESIGN CONSTR CONSTR SCHEDULE CHANGE FROM DISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET AS START COMPLETE START DATE COMPL DATE PREVIOUS MONTH
Buffalo Channel (Vegas Dr- sharleston) Buffalo Channel(Summerlin Pkwy.-Vegssf
Buffalo Channel(Westc1iff- Summerlin Pkwy.)
$ 188.000
3 1,500,000
Cheyenne Channel
$908.000 567,000 CareyRake Mead Detention Basin
Freeway Channel I 1-1 5 to lvanhoe sgoo.000
Gowan /CAM10 & Lone Mtn DB's Predesign d 1m.m t Gowan Detention.Basins . . . :
. . - - , - - -
. . . . . . . . $10,240,000 Gowan Outfall - Phase 2
$0 $26,000 Odtey Blvd. Detention Basin . . Sy.t- . . . . . '. . :
,Outfdl $2,054,000 $50,000
. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37.970,000 Oakey Collection System &
Rampart Storm Drain
Washington Avo. System Design 565,000 $65,000
I I I Washington Avo. Channel ROW I I I
$270,000 Washington Ave./Sandhill Outlet
$ 1,700,000 Washington Ave./Sandhill-Virgil
I I I I Construction
32,245,000 DONE
DONE
DONE
01 193 05/93 12/93
05/93 1 0193 09/94
oject has not been scheduled
$7,500,000 DONE DONE NOW 07/93
I DONE I DONE INOW lo1/93 I I I I I IBLM delay in approving the
59,519,200 DONE DONE 12/92 d + 2 9/93 d + 2 constmco environmental report will result in
'on start delav
NOW 05/93 09/93 11/94
DONE DONE
$1,700,000 DONE DONE DONE DONE construction pending BLM approval of Oakey Detention
r . DONE 01/33 d + 3 06/93 Basin -
ISTRICT SUMMARY SHEET AS PREVIOUS MONTH
ttman Wash Channel-Phase 111
Stimson Chnnne
$100.000 11194 11133 11132 d + 2 NOW North Las Vegas Detention Basin - Outlet Modifications 530,000
-8-
~
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: DUCK CREEK BRIDGES AT TOMIYASU AND PACHUCA
DESCRIPTION: NEW BRIDGES OVER DUCK CREEK AT PACHUCA AND TOMIYASU
PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $645,000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN 11/01/92
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CL-CES
BIDS OPEN 01/01/93
CONSTRUCTION START 02/01/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 07/01/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: HEFNER
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: ADDITIONAL ROW REQUIRED AT TOMIYASU.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: PACHUCA DESIGN ON 09/21/92.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE FINAL DESIGN.
PROJECT MANAGER: HAND PHONE #: 455-8339
-9-
t b i
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: EAST RANGE WASH DETENTION FACILITY
DESCRIPTION: DETENTION BASIN AND 0UTLET.CHANNEL FACILITIES
PERCENT COMPLETE : - 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $9,387,500.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN 12/03/92
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 01/07/93
CONSTRUCTION START 01/20/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 01/28/94
CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP.
CONSTRUCTION PRIm CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: BCC APPROVED PESC CONTRACT 03/17/92.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: MET WITH GENERAL GRIFFITH ON 08/21/92. AIR FORCE ACCEPTED CONCEPT ON 09/03/92.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: 11 BEGIN FINAL DESIGN.
PROJECT W A G E R : BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 -10-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: FLAMINGO WASH AT WINNICK AVENUE
DESCRIPTION: COLLECT FLAMINGO WASH AND DISCHARGE AT KOVAL
PERCENT COMPLETE : - 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4,3.00,000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN 12/01/92
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 02/01/93
CONSTRUCTION START 03/01/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/01/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G.C. WALLACE
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: INVESTIGATION OF A WORKING HYDRAULIC MODEL - - 2 MONTH TIME FRAME ANTICIPATED.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: RESEARCHED FACILITIES AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTING A WORKING HYDRAULIC MODEL.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH; PROCEED WITH WORKING MODEL - - 2 MONTH TIME FRAME ANTICIPATED.
(1
PROJECT MANAGER: HAND PHONE #: 455-8339 -11-
mGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROV. PHASE I - ANNIE OAKLEY TO PALM DESCRIPTION: COMPLETE REMAINING RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS
PERCENT COMPLETE: 100% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3.000.000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)
DESIGN 02/28/92
R/W C L U C E S
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 04/02/92
CONSTRUCTION START 05/11/92
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/21/92
CONSULTAN!I'/PROJECT MANAGER:
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTRACTOR COMPLETED PUNCHLIST.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
PROJECT MANAGER: WONDRA PHONE #: 455-7707 -12-
I/ REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT ll ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I1 - CROSSINGS DESCRIPTION: PECOS. SANDHILL, MTN VISTA - COMPLETE REMAINING PROJECT
COMPONENTS
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 7% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: ~3,000.000.00
DESIGN
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)
06/30/92
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 09/18/92
CONSTRUCTION START 10/30/92
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 03/30/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R :
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
r
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE DESIGN ON NEXT PHASE. RFCD BOARD AWARD SCHEDULED FOR 10/08/92 AND BCC AWARD FOR 10/20/92.
I1
PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 -13-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30 PROJECT: RAWHIDE CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I11 - CROSSINGS DESCRIPTION: TOMIYASU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, ANNIE OAKLEY, PERAL, AND MOJAVE.
PERCENT COMPLETE : 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 3 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN 11/23/92
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 12/23/92
CONSTRUCTION START 02/20/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 06/20/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:
CONSTRUCTION PRIm CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED DESIGN, CONDUCTED HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS, PREPARED SCHEDULE, AND MET WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE 90% DESIGN.
PR0JECT"ANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 -14-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: Q9/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IIA) DESCRIPTION: ROCHELLE/HILDEBRAND TO PECOS-MCLEOD & VIKING - ALSO
DETENTION BASIN E
PERCENT COMPLETE : - 5% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3,500,000.00
DESIGN
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
11/09/92
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 12/17/92
CONSTRUCTION START 02/15/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/01/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: SEA
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED DESIGN.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE DESIGN. POT-HOLE FLAMINGO AT HILDEBRAND. ESTABLISH ZONE CHANGE FOR DETENTION BASIN E.
PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE Q: 455-7707 -15-
. .
REGIONAL FLOOD CON!I?ROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30 PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IIB) DESCRIPTION: TWAIN/MONUMENT TO PECOS/FLAMINGO INCL. DETENTION BASIN 0
PERCENT COMPLETE: e% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: ~1.300.000.00
DESIGN
R/W CLEAWWCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN
CONSTRUCTION START
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
~ ~~
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: SUPPLEMENTAL INTERLOCAL CONTRACT APPROVED BY BCC ON 09/01/92.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: NEGOTIATE CONTRACT.
PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE: #: 455-7707 -16-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 08/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: AUGUST 1 TO: &UGUST 31
PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ( P m E 111) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - ROCHELLE TO UNIVERSITY/MCLEOD.
PERCENT COMPLETE: 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $922.000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN 06/08/92
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 08/05/92
CONSTRUCTION START 10/19/92
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 02/19/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : E A
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTOR
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: PROJECT AWARDED ON 08/18/92 TO PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTORS.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH; BEGIN CONSTRUCTION.
PROJECT W A G E R : CEDERBURG. G . PHONE #: 455-7742 -17-
r
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE IV) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES & DETENTION BASIN C BETWEEN
MCLEOD/UNIVERSITY & HARMON/HARRISON INTERSECTIONS
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 7% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,072,000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)
DESIGN 09/08/92
R/W CLEARAETCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
~ ~ ~~~~
BIDS OPEN 11/23/92
CONSTRUCTION START 01/18/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 04/30/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: DELTA ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: SPECIAL SOILS INVESTIGATION ON BASIN C DUE TO HIGH WATER TABLE. PHASE V TIED TO BASIN C OUTFALL.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED FINAL REVIEW OF 100% PLANS.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
11/23/92, AND AWARD ON 12/15/92. ADVERTISE ON 10/08/92, HOLD PRE-BID ON 10/26/92, OPEN BIDS ON
PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 -18-
ll REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT I/ ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE V) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES BETWEEN HARMON/HARRISON
INTERSECTION & TROPICANA AVE.
PERCENT COMPLETE: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,627,000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: ( DATES )
DESIGN 08/14/92
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 11/23/92
CONSTRUCTION START 01/18/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 04/23/93
~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: PENTACORE
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
11 DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT SCHEDULE ADJUSTED TO COINCIDE WITH VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL IV
I/ BASIN C CONSTRUCTION.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED DESIGN.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: ADVERTISE ON 10/09/92 (AFTER PHASE IV).
_. -- I
PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 -19-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJgCT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE VI) DESCRIPTION: FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES - EASTERN/TOMPKINS TO MARYLAND/RENO
& SPENCER - TROPICANA TO RENO AND DETENTION BASIN A
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $4.870.000.00
DESIGN
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: ( DATES )
10/27/92
R/W CLEARMK!ES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 12/02/92
CONSTRUCTION START 01/14/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 09/16/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: JM MONTGOMERY
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED FINAL PRE-DESIGN.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: BEGIN DESIGN.
PROJECT . W A G E R : BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 -20-
~~~ ~ ~
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL - ROW ACOUISTION DESCRIPTION: APPRAISE AND ACOUIRE ROW FOR DETENTION BASIN SITES.
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 70% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: ~3,100,000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)
DESIGN
R/W CLEARANCES 12/30/92
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN
CONSTRUCTION START
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER:
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS ON SITE 0.
PROJECT MANAGER: LAND PHONE #: 455-8300 -21-
. _
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: BUNKERVILLE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL
DESCRIPTION: CONSTRUCT CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL FROM HIGHWAY THRU TOWN & EARTHEN CHANNEL FROM EDGE OF TOWN TO VIRGIN RIVER. DESIGN ONLY.
PERCENT COMPLETE: _. 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $1,714,648.00
DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:
(DATES)
R/W CLEARANCES 04/15/92
ENVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93
BIDS OPEN
CONSTRUCTION START
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE ~ ~~~ ~~~
CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : THE MARK GROUP
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT ON HOLD DUE TO PROJECT PROTEST BY BUNKERVILLE TAB. PROJECT WILL BE DELAYED DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS. MARK GROUP NEEDS TO FINALIZE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: SCHEDULED MEETING WITH KENYON LEAVITT. CHAIRMAN OF BUNKERVILLE TAB.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. CLOSE OUT CONTRACT WITH MARK GROUP. MEET WITH BUNKERVILLE TAB TO DISCUSS CURRENTLY DESIGNED PROJECT AND THE REQUESTED FUTURE DETENTION SITE.
PROJECT W A G E R : CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 -22-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: GOODSPRINGS - FLOOD CONTROL DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT BERM AND CHANNEL ALONG SOUTH SIDE OF
TOWN AND WIDEN CHANNEL ALONG PACIFIC ST. ON NORTH SIDE OF TOWN.
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $99.000.00
DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:
(DATES )
R/W CLEARANCES 93/15/92
ENVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93
BIDS OPEN 08/15/93
CONSTRUCTION START 09/15/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 12/31/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. WALLACE
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DELAY DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS. ACQUISITION OF ROW WITHIN SAN PEDRO AVE. TO PROPOSED DISCHARGE POINT.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONTINUED DESIGN EFFORTS.
II WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: MEET WITH GOODSPRINGS TAB TO DISCUSS PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES.
PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 -23-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY ON HIKO SPRINGS TO CONTROL 100-YEAR FLOWS.
FACILITIES INCLUDE DETENTION BASIN, CHANNEL, AND FIVE BRIDGES.
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $19,000.000.00
DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:
(DATES)
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEZkRANCES
BIDS OPEN
CONSTRUCTION START
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
CONSULTANT/PROJ'ECT MANAGER: BOYLE ENG'G
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: BEGAN TO SCHEDULE SID STEPS TO DETERMINE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE TO SCHEDULE SID STEPS TO DETERMINE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL.
PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707
-24-
i
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT d
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA 1
DESCRIPTION: DESIGN DIVERSION OF LOGAN WASH INTO ANDERSON WASH TO REDUCE PEAK FLOWS.
PERCENT COMPLETE: 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT:
DESIGN
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)
08/24/92
$0.00
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN 10/08/92
CONSTRUCTION START 12/01/92
~~~~ ~ ~
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE ~~~~
02/15/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: DAMES & MOORE
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SHOULD BE ON SCHEDULE.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: NEGOTIATED WITH CONSULTANT. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT #2 APPROVED ON 09/15/92 AND LETTER SENT TO CONSULTANT.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: PREPARE SCHEDULE AND ADVERTISE FOR CONSTRUCTION.
PROJECT MANAGER: REZABECK PHONE #: 455-8303
-25-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN WASH DIVERSION/CHANNEL AREA 2
DESCRIPTION: INLET STRUCTURE AT UPRR BRIDGE, TWO 10' X 8 ' RCBS. CROSSING AT SR 169 AND OPEN CHANNEL.
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $3.269.540.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN 01/03/92
R/W CLEARANCES 02/15/92
ENVIR CLEARANCES 02/15/92
BIDS OPEN 04/23/92 ~ ~~
CONSTRUCTION START 09/21/92
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 02/14/93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : DAMES'& MOORE
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR: MEADOW VALLEY
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
UNDERGROUND DESIGN AND BCC APPROVED $200,000 CHANGE ORDER TO CONSTRUCT 2 10' CAST IN PLACE PIPES INSTEAD OF OPEN CHANNEL.
NEWTON PROPERTY CAUSING DELAY. NEWTON TO DEDICATE ROW. IN-HOUSE
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: BEGAN CONSTRUCTION ON 09/21/92.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION.
I!
PROJECT '.WAGER: , WONDRA PHONE #: 455-7748
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: MOAPA VALLEY - MUDDY RIVER (WEST) LEVEE DESCRIPTION: DESIGN EARTH LEVEE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE RIVER TO CONTAIN
100-YEAR STORM.
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 7% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $2,439,118.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEZLWWCES
BIDS OPEN
CONSTRUCTION START
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: THE MARK GROUP
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT SCHEDULE & DATES TO BE REVISED ONCE PROJECT PROBLEMS RESOLVED. ID & ACQUISITION OF ROW & EASEMENTS FROM THE 60 PLUS PROPERTY OWNERS WILL BE EXTREMELY LENGTHY.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: MET DENNIS JOHNSON OF RFCD AND DAVE MALPASS OF MARK GROUP. REVIEWED ROW PLATS AND MAPS AND SENT CORRECTIONS TO MARK GROUP.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: 11 MEET WITH RFCD AND CONSULTANT. SEND LETTER TO CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT
I/ TO DO ADDITIONAL OUT-OF-SCOPE SERVICES.
PROJECT MANAGER: REZABEK PHONE #: 455-8303
-27-. . .
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ~~ ~ ~~ ~
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: NELSON FLOOD CONTROL
DESCRIPTION: DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT DIVERSION BERM UPSTREAM OF ROAD. WIDEN CHANNEL AND DIP.
PERCENT COMPLETE : - 1% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $70.000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)
DESIGN
R/W CLEARANCES
m I R CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN ~ ~~~
CONSTRUCTION START
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
~ ~~
CONSULTANT/PROJECT W A G E R : G C WALLACE
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
11 DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: COST OF FACILITIES EXCEEDS BUDGETED AMOUNT. MASTER PLAN UPDATE
ll PROPOSES ACQUIRING PROPERTY IN LIEU OF BUILDING FACILITIES.
(( WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: UPDATED CURRENT INTERLOCAL CONTRACT TO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY
II DIP CROSSING.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: 11 MEET WITH RFCD TO DISCUSS COURSE OF ACTION FOR THE RECOMMENDED MMTER 11 PLAN FACILITIES.
PROJECT W A G E R : CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309
-28- . . . - . - - -
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: SEARCHLIGHT - DIKE DESCRIPTION: MASTER PLAN STRUCTURES #5014, 5015, 5016 & 5017
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 4% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S1.72,OOO. 00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES)
DESIGN 09/24/92
R/W CL-CES
ENVIR CLEARANCES 08/01/93
BIDS OPEN 07/27/93
CONSTRUCTION START 09/04/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 12/31 /93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G C WALLACE
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
I II DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROJECT CONSTRUCTION DELAYS DUE TO ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS. NEED TO SECURE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR ACQUIRE NECESSARY ROW AT OUTFALL. BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT NEEDS TO BE CONDUCTED AND THEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY BLM (FISH & WILDLIFE).
I' !I r WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: COMPLETED DESIGN. DAMES AND MOORE CONDUCTED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: BEGIN BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT DUE TO A TORTOISE BEING FOUND WITHIN
-- I PROJECT SITE.
PROJECT MANAGER: CATANESE PHONE #: 455-8309 -2?-
I/ REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT II ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: 09/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - UNNAMED WASH DESCRIPTION: DESIGN FACILITY ON THE UNAMED WASH TO CONTROL 100-YEAR STORM
FLOWS. FACILITIES INCLUDE CHANNEL. SEDIMENT BASIN AND BRIDGE ON NEEDLES HWY.
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 8% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $8,000.000.00 b
DESIGN SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:
(DATES )
06/15/91
R/W CLEARANCES 12/20/91
ENVIR CLEARANCES 12/01/91
BIDS OPEN 12/31/92
CONSTRUCTION START 02/22/93
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE 11/02/93 ~~~
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: SIMONS, LI & ASSOCIATES
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: PROV. ORDER HEARING ON 06-04-91--64% PROTEST. SECOND TRY AS SID. EPA WANTS MITIGATION PLAN IN PLACE & REVIEWED PRIOR TO 404 PERMIT ISSUANCE. APPROVAL OF 47 ACRES FROM COLORADO RIVER COMM. TO CC.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: DETERMINED MITIGATION NEEDS. UPDATED TORTOISE STUDY RECEIVED. 404 PERMIT APPLICATION STLL PENDING.
~. - _ -
PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707 -30-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTRDL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/29/!
ALTd saoRH%hly RE IEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Meadows Detention Basin Phase V
Description:Storm drain installation on Aka Drive from Decatur to Jones.
Percent Complete: 50% Desian Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design 01 /18/93
RAN Clearances 01 /18/93
Envir Clearances 01 /18/93
Bids Open 03/09/93
Start Construction 05/01 /93
Construction Complete 12/01 /93
$954800.00
Complete
Consultant/Project Manager: In-house redesian
Construction Prime Contractor:
r Delays or problems area: None.
Work completed during month: Modifying Meadows Detention Basin Phase IV design plans to remove Decatur to Jones design as separate bid package to be named Phase V.
Work to be completed during next month: Complete redesign of Phase V.
Project Manager: Mark TeeRen. P.E. Phone:229-2211
-31-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUSREPORT
' 'TY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/24/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Buffalo Drive: Sahara to Westcliff
Description:Construction of full imwovements between Sahara and Westcliff: includes a flood control channel between Doe and Westcliff.
Percent Complete: 35% Design Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design 05/17/93
R/W Clearances 05/17/93
Envir Clearances 05/17/93
Bids Open 07/19/93
Start Construction 10/04/93
Construction Complete 09/04/94
$6930000.00
Complete
Consultant/Project Manager: VTN Enaineerina: Ken Gilbreth, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:
Delays or problems area: None.
Work completed during month: Reviewing 30% design submittal.
Work to be completed during next month: 70% design submittal due 11/30/92.
Project Manager: David Nathan, P.E. Phone:229-6733
-32-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT
ENTITY: Citv of Las Vegas DATE PREPARED:09/241
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Buffalo Channel: Summerlin Parkwav to Veaas
Description:Construction a flood control channel from Summerlin Parkwav to Veaas Dr.
Percent Complete: 100% Desian Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design 08/3 1 /92
R/W Clearances 08/3 1 /92
Envir Clearances 08/3 1 /92
Bids Open 1 1 /03/92
Start Construction 0 1 /04/93
Construction Complete 06/04/93
$1908000.00
Complete
- X
- X
- X
Consultant/Project Manager: VTN Enaineers, Ken Gilbreth, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:
Work completed during month: Obtaining final design plan approval.
Work to be completed during next month: Pre-bid meeting scheduled for 10/15/92.
~. . . , . _ ' \ ! - ' /
Project Manager: Dave Nathan, P.E. Phone:229-6733
-33 - -
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT
' 'TY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/1 5/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Buffalo lnterchanae
Description:Desian and construction of an interchanae on Buffalo at Summerlin Parkwav includina a box culvert from Westcliff to Washinaton
Percent Complete: 35% Construction Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design 04/22/9 1
R/W Clearances 04/22/9 1
Envir Clearances 04/22/9 1
Bids Open 03/3 1 /92
Start Construction 06/15/92
Construction Complete 06/19/93
$7361000.00
Complete
_. X
_. X
- X
- X
X -
Consultant/Project Manager: G B & L Consultants, Georae Brizendine, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:Max riacls Construction
Work completed during month: Completed placement of concrete for entire box culvert. Imported fill for north abutment and placed concrete for north and south footings and abutment walls.
i "
Work to be completed during next month: Continue importing material for north abutment. Begin importing fill for south abutment. Continue placing concrete for footings and abutment walls.
Project Manager: Brian P. Walsh, P.E. Phone:229-6736
-34-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUSREPORT
ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/29/.' b3
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Chevenne Channel: Buffalo to Gowan Detention Basin
Description:Desian the construction of Chevenne channel from Buffalo to Gowan Detention Basin.
Percent Complete: 0% Desian Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design
R/W Clearances -L-.l-
Envir Clearances u Bids Open u Start Construction u Construction Complete u
C on sultant/Project Manager:
Construction Prime Contractor:
$0.00
Complete
Delays or problems area:
Work completed during month: Awaiting executed funding agreement.
Work to be completed during next month: Begin selection process for design consultant.
Project Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone:229-2212
-35-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUSREPORT
r TY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/29/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Carev / Lake Mead Detention Basin
Description:Desian and construction of the Carev / Lake mead Detention Basin and convevance svstem.
Percent Complete: 100% Construction Estimated Cost of Project: $40651 78.00
Schedule for Completion Complete
Design
R/W Clearances
08/01 /92
08/01 /92
- X
- X
e Envir Clearances 08/01 /92 - X
Bids Open 09/17/91
Start Construction 1 1 /06/9 1
Construction Complete 08/3 1 /92
Consultant/Project Manager: VTN Nevada, Ken Gilbreth, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:Meadow Vallev Contractors
- X
- X
- X
Delays or problems area: Contractor delayed completion and may be assessed liquidated damages.
Work completed during month: File final notice of completion.
Work to be completed during next month:
Project Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone:229-22 1 2
-36-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT
ENTITY: Citv of Las Vegas DATE PREPARED:09/241
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/31 192 TO:09/28/92
Project: Gowan North and South Detention Basins
Description:Construction of the Detention Basins and 72-inch connector DiDe.
Percent Complete: 15 Construction Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design -LlL
R/W Clearances L L - Envir Clearances u Bids Open 06/15/92
Start Construction 0711 5/92
Construction Complete 0713 1 193
$6300000.00
Complete
Consultant/Project Manager: Poaaemever Desian GroudLarrv Carrol
Construction Prime Contractor:American AsDhalt
Delays or problems area: Haul Road continues to disrupt traffic in Cheyenne/Buffalo area. However, busing is being provided for the affected students and CLV has filed for right-of-way on Cimmeron between Gowan and Cheyenne to provide a better route to Kahre/Eisenberg school.
Work completed during month: Excavation proceeding on schedule. The 72-inch RCP in tenaya between the detention basins is complete.
Work to be completed during next month: 8-foot by 8-foot RCB across Gowan, Buffalo Channel inlet (south basin), 72-inch entrance structure (south basin), Gowan transition structure, lower north basin baffeled outlet, upper north basin spillway starting at north
Project Manager: Thomas D. Chiatovich, P.E. Phone:229-6276
-37-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
'TY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/24/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:O8/31/92 TO:09/28/92
Project: Gowan Detention Basin Outfall
Description:Construction of 5'x 8' RCB from Decatur to Tenava alona Gowan Road.
Percent Complete: - 78 Construction Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design u R/W Clearances u Envir Clearances u Bids Open u Start Construction 041 1 5/9 2
Construction Complete 0 1 /30/93
$4300000.00
Complete
- X
- X
- X
- X
- X
Consultant/Project Manager: Poaaemever Desian GrouD/Larrv Carroll
Construction Prime Contractor:Las Veaas Pavina
Delays or problems area:
Work completed during month: Placed 8'x 5' RCB to Rainbow on gowan. New 18-inch sanitary sewer is in place from Torrey Pines to Marcus. Paving has been completed from Decatur to Bradley on Gowan and from Jones to Torrey Pines. Additionally, 3 water mains have been relocated.
Work to be completed during next month: Sanitary Sewer between Rainbow and Tenaya. RCB will be installed to U.S.95. Four Las Vegas Valley Water District water main crossings.
I. <. " ~. . . - . .. * - + , - . , . t
Project Manager: Thomas D. Chiatovich. P.E. Phone:z29-6276 L , q .; ;.,:- , . , . .. I. -
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT
ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/29/'
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Oakev Detention Basin and Convevance Svstem
Description:Construction of flood control facilities which include basin, collection svstem and outfall.
Percent Complete: 100% Desian Estimated Cost of Project: $10855000.00
Schedule for Completion Complete
Design 08/01 /92 _. X
R/W Clearances 08/01 /92 - X
Envir Clearances L - Bids Open u - Start Construction L - Construction Complete u -
Consultant/Project Manager: Bovle Enaineerina, Gerald Moleton, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:
-~ ~
Delays or problems area: Awaiting approval of environmental report from BLM.
Work completed during month: Obtained final approvals.
Work to be completed during next month: Begin advertising bid package.
Project Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone:229-2212
-39-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUSREPORT
F "'TY: Citv of Lad Vegas DATE PREPARED:09/29/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Washinaton Ave. Svstem / Virail to Lena
Description:TriDle 12' x 8' RCB in Washinaton Ave. from Virail to Lena.
Percent Complete: 95% Desian Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design 08/03/92
R/W Clearances 08/03/92
Envir Clearances 08/03/92
Bids Open u Start Construction L Construction Complete u
$2437000.00
Complete
- X
- X
- X
Cb, dtant/Project Manager: MEA / Laurnal Gubler, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:
Delays or problems area: Project funded for design only. To be constructed in 1995.
Work completed during month:
I I
Work to be completed during next month:
L I
Project Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone:229-2212
-40 -
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUSREPORT
ENTITY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/29/C
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/18/92
Project: Washinaton Ave. Svstem I Sandhill Outfall
Description:Tride 12' x 8' RCB from the Las Veaas Wash to Washinaton Ave.
Percent Complete: 100% Construction Estimated Cost of Project: $1802000.00
Schedule for Completion Complete
Design 12/01 /91 . x - R/W Clearances 1 2/01 /9 1 - X
Envir Clearances 12/01 /91 _. X
Bids Open 91/07/92 - X
Start Construction 03/01 /92 - X
Construction Complete 08/09/92 - X
Consultant/Project Manager: MEA / Laurnal Gubler, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor: J.A. Tiberti Construction
Delays or problems area: None.
Work completed during month: Filing of final notice of completion.
Work to be completed during next month:
I A
Project Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone:229-2212
-43-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
r "TY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/29/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/22/92 TO:09/15/92
Project: Washinaton Ave. Svstem / Sandhill to Virail
Description:Tride 12' x 8' RCB in Washinaton Ave. from Sandhill to Virail.
b b
Percent Complete: 100% Desian Estimated Cost of Project:
Schedule for Completion
Design 05/3 1 /92
R/W Clearances 05/31 /92
Envir Clearances 05/3 1 /92
Bids Open 10/27/92
Start Construction 01 /05/93
Construction Complete 06/24/93
$2437000.00
Complete
- X
_. X
_. X
Cbb Isultant/Project Manager: MEA / Laurnal Gubler, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:
Delays or problems area: None.
Work completed during month: Project being advertised for bid.
Work to be completed during next month: Bid opening to be held.
. . ~ ~
Project Manager: Joe Christensen, P.E. Phone:229-2212
SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS ; 8-28-82 ; 5 :22PM ; 7025655681- , Clark C n t y RFCD;# 3
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD COIWROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
REVIEW PERIOD: F.ROM:-.&&&zr 1.1992 TO:&ptcmbq 30.1992
PROJECT: C-1
DESIGN March. 1993
wwcLEARAN&s -ikmklm
BNVIRCLEARANCES December. 1992
BIDS OPEN Auril. 1993
START CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE November. 1m
s s :
CONSULTANT/PROJECI' MANAOER:
CONSTRUCTION PRIME C O N T R A C l ' O R N a n s
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Nom.
DURTNO CURRENT MONTH: Held public hearbig and rsvlewed pre-dasign report.
form -pal lorn90
-43-
SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS 1025655687- , Clark Cnty RFCD;# 5
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL CONTROL DISTRICT .:; PROJECT STATUS REPORT
B N " Y a of -on DA-er 29.1992
REVIEW PERIOD:
PROJECT:- Channel Phase III
I FROM:.&@rnber 1.1992 T0:September 30.1992 -
PERCENTCOMPLETE: 90 46 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: S3JQQ&&
SCHEDULE FOR COMpLgllON: (d-0
DESION L WW CLEARANCES Julv 1992
ENVlR C L B A R A N C E S - BIDS OPEN te
START CONSTRUCTION te
CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGERPoeesmsver/L- Captall
CONSTRUCTION PRIME C 0 N T R A C T O R : m
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: Construction will be deferred until fiscal ysar 1999/2OOO,
w
WORK COMPLETED DUIUNCI CURRENT MONTH:
plans, Received 90% plans, Meetings held with CCRFCD and Clark County to determias appropriate action. Contimre work on design
WORK TO BE COMPCETBD DURING NEXT MONTH: Begin review of 90% plans.
-44- .
SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS ; 9-29-92 ; 5:24PM ; 7 0 2 5 6 5 5 6 8 7 * Clark Cnty RFCD;# 7
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DWIRICT ,vn
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
B N " Y City of H- DATE- 29. 1992
R E W W PERIOD: FROM: Septamk 1.1992 To: SeMember 30. 1992
PROJECI': Sumst - and . . DESCRIPTION: - o f G 5 2 A F v o u t l e t a n d - r inhtof-wau,
PERCENTCOMPLETE: 0 96 ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: 5-
SCHEDULE FOR COhfPLBTXON:
..
(dm)
DESIcfN --&km-- WWCLEARANCRS - ENKIRCLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN - START CONSTRUCTION undetermined
CONSTRUCI'ION COMPLEi'IE
M)NSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: None
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:-
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: I None
NEXTMONTH:
PROJECT MANAGER:- PHONE #; 565-2432 Q\WORD?mTA- firm pn 10/26/90
SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS ; 9-29-62 5:23PM ; 1025655687+ CI ark C n t y RFCD;# 4
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
EN"Y-n DATE Se~p%glber 29. 1992
REVIEW PERIOD: PROM: Setdmber 1. 1992 TO: . 30- 1992
PROJECT: : DESCRIPTION: 1 Pecos Road to Pitman Wash
j n U F J R R r i n h t O f ~
PERCENT COMPLETE: 30 % ES"ATED COST OF PROJECT: $23Qp9oo.OO ' ,
DESION Comblete
R/wcLEARANcEs - ENVIR CLEARANW -
r * : BIDS OPEN Comolete
START CONSTRUCTION i h n d B L CONSTRUCTION C O M P L ~ JsmkJm
CONSUL,TANT/PROJECT MANAOER: 0. C. W-calvin Black
CONSTRUCTION PRIME ( X W " M m R : m
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: None.
WORK COMPLETED DURINO CURReNT MONTH: . Placed coonete in lower portion of channel.
PROJECT MANAGER PHONE # S65-=9 c:\WOiW5iFDMA\~CUWPB~
. V I
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DLSTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: City of North Las Vegas DATE PREPARED: 09/25/92
REVlEW PERIOD FROM: 09/01/92 T O 09/30/92
PROJECT. Gowan Outfall Structure
Construction of the outfall structure for the Gowan Road Detention Basin system
12,729,000
DESIGN
RnQcLEARANcEs
ENVIRCLEARANCES
Complete
Complete
Complete
Complete
April 1991
August 1992
BIDS OPEN
START CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
CONSULTANTPROJECT MANAGER: VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas
pRIME CONTRACTOR: Las Vegas Paving Corporation
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Construction substantially completed.
.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Finalize project.
-47- PROJECT MANAGER: bv: - PHONE #* . .
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: City of North Las Veqas DATE PREPARED: 09/25/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 09 /01 /92 T O 09/30/92
PROIF,CT* Western Tributary to the Las Vegas Wash (Stimson Channel)
DESCRIPTION. Lined channel between Commerce Street and Lone Mountain Road, and channel entrance protection.
PERCENT COMPLETE: 2L% ESTMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 5 8 0 , 0 0 0
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (daw
DESIGN Complete
WWCLEARANCES N/A
ENVIRCLEARANCES N/A
BIDS OPEN Complete
START CONSTRUCTION November 1992
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE February lg9
CONSULTAN'IPROJECT MANAGER VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
-Difficulties in coordination of plans prepared by two different designers and conflict in interpretation of plan details. -Newly discovered ground fissures
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
No construction work performed.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Reconcile all outstanding conflicts. Re-start construction work.
REGIONMI PLOOD CON”R0L~DISTRlCT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: City of North Las Vegas DATE PREPARED: 09/25/92
RFVIEW PERIOD FROM: 09/01/92 To: 09/30/92
PROJEm Kyle Canyon Detention Basin
Design and prepare plans and specifications for detention basin and collection dlKeS
PERCENTCOMPLETE: - 55 % ESl”ATEDcoSTOFPR0JECT: $ 510,000 design phase ?
SCHEDULE FORCOMPWON w-s)
November 1992
November 1992
November 1992
September 1993
November 1993
November 1994
DESIGN
WW-CES
ENVIRCLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN
START CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
CONSULTANT/PROJECT IitWAW-
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACl’OR N/A
VTN Nevada/City of North Las Vegas
DELRYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
Possible problem with 10-year old Indian Allotment Claim on small portion of project.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Submitted 90% plans and specifications.
WORK “0 BE COMPLFIP) DURING MONTH:
- Review 90% plans. - Resolve Indian Allotment Claim.
PROJECT MANAGER: BY: Gil Gilpin PHONE #: 399-5156 -49-
REGIONNJ PLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: 09/01/92 n): 09/30/92
PROJECT* Upper Las Vegas Wash Detention Basin
Construct detention basin and associated facilities in the vicinity of Floyd Lamb State Park
PER- COMPLETE: 35% ESTIMATED COSP OFPROJECI: $ 8 ,800 ,000
DESIGN
WWCLEARANCES
ENVIRCLEARANCES
May 1991
November 1991
November 1991
March 1992 BIDS OPEN
START CONSTRUCI'ION May 1992
July 1993 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
CONSULTANT/PROJECI MANAa Black and Veatch/City of North Las Vegas
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACI'OR Granite Construction Company
11 DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
-Continued damage to tortoise fence by recreation vehicles, daily.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: - 70% of embankment over-excavation completed - 35% of total embankment placed - 12% of interception channel completed - 80% of aggregate (for R.C.C.) production completed - 100% of outlet works completed - 90% of the debris removal completed - 50% of special dust control on Jones Boulevard completed WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
- Complete 100% of the embankment over-excavation
-50-
REaONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: City of North Las Veqas DATE PREPARED: 09/25/92
REVIEW PERXOD FROM: 09/01/92 TO 09/30/92
PROJECP West Range Wash Diversion Dike
Design and prepare plans and specifications for 5-1/2 mile long dike and appurtenances
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION:
DESIGN
WWCLEARANCES
ENVIRCLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN
Completed
August 1992
June 1992
December 1992
January 1993 START CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE September lgg3
CONSULTAN'IPROJECT MRNAGER Boyle Engineering/City of North Las Vegas
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACT0 *
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREX3
BLM staff hesitates to issue a lease/permit until resolution of outstanding mining claim.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Attemptedto obtainmining claim relinquishment from Southern Nevada Paving Co.
WORK TO BE COMPLEI'ED DURING NECI' MONTH:
Obtain relinquishment.
PROJECT MANA- Rv* .. P i 1 CiQin PHONE #. - 6 -5i- . .
SEP-30-92 WED 10; 55 BC PUBLIC WORKS FAX NO, 7022939241
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
ENTITY: Boulder City DATE PREPAREO: 9/30/92 REVIEWPERIODFROM: September I - September 30, 1992
PROJECT; Hemonway Valley Flood Control
DESCRIPTION: -Wide shallow flood plairl with conltol low flow cI1annel and slabllized bank, detension basins, debris basins, outlet works, pipes, channel, dlkes, culve.ns, & olher appurlenances.
PERCENT COMPLETE 72010 ESTIMATED COSTOF PROJECT $5,666,000.00
SCHEDULE OF COMPLETION: (dates)
DESGN , Sep-91
RMI CLEARANCES N/A
ENVlR CLEARANCES N/A
BIDS OPEN oct -9 1
START CONSTRUCTION J a n 4 2
CONSEiUCTION COMPLETE J a n -9 3
CONSULTANTPROJECTMANAGER: Coe & Van Loo, Paul Hoskins
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR; M a x Riggs Construcfion Co,
c
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS:
TO BE COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONrM 1
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: '
Complete concrate channel bottom & sideslopo of upper Trailhead Channel. Start landscape 8. rail conslruction.
r J
PROJECT MANAGER: Phillip T. Henry PHONE 293-9200
P I 01
11 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 11 II PROJECT STATUS REPORT II
ENTITY: CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DATE PREPARED: Q9/30/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM: SEPTEMBER 1 TO: SEPTEMBER 30
PROJECT: LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS BRIDGE CANYON FEMA REMAPPING DESCRIPTION: ESA FOR LOMA
PERCENT COMPLETE: - 5% ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $70,000.00
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (DATES )
DESIGN
R/W CLEARANCES
ENVIR CLEARANCES
BIDS OPEN
CONSTRUCTION START
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETE
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: BOYLE ENG. CO.
CONSTRUCTION PRIME CONTRACTOR:
DELAYS OR PROBLEMS AREAS: RFCD REVIEW REQUIRED BEFORE BCC APPROVAL NECESSITATED START DELAY.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: CONCLUDED GATHERING OF INFORMATION FOR FEMA TELE-CONFERENCE MEETING.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH: HOLD FEMA TELE-CONFERENCE MEETING.
4
PROJECT MANAGER: BRANDT PHONE #: 455-7707
- 5 3--
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECTSTATUS REPORT
8
TY: Citv of Las Veaas DATE PREPARED:09/24/92
REVIEW PERIOD FROM:08/31/92 TO:09/28/92
Project: Gowan North Channel (Phase I I Proiect)
Description:Channel to interceDt and convev flows from the Northwest into the Gowan North Detention Basin.
Percent Complete: 100 Pre-desian Estimated Cost of Project: $7490000.00
Schedule for Completion Complete
Design x - R/W Clearances u - Envir Clearances -I!-!- - Bids Open 07/01 /97 - Start Construction 07/01 197 -
Construction Complete 07/0 1 /97 -
ConsultantIProject Manager: Church Enaineerinanodd Kenner, P.E.
Construction Prime Contractor:
Delays or problems area:
Work completed during month: Project complete.
Work to be completed during next month:
I’
Project Manager: Randv Fultz. P.E. Phone:229-6276 .
~~
-54-
SENT BY :PUBLIC WORKS ; 9-29-92 ; 5 :24PM ; 9 0 2 5 6 5 5 6 8 7 + CI ark C n t y RFCD;# 6
CLAR€i COUNTY REGIONAL m D CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT STATUS REPORT .\I
D A W 29. 1992
DESIGN complatsd
START CONSTRUCT'ION cktuw5L
CONSULTANT/PROJECT M A N A a R B and V-
CONSTRUCI'ION PRIME CONTRACKIR:-n
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
CURRENTMONTH:
PROJECT M A N A G E R C u a C h a n d l s r PHONE t 565-2329 /
C ? \ ~ ~ T A ~ ' form -pw 10/26/90
-55-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 09 / 01 / 92
Review Period From: 09 / 01 / 92 To 10 / 01 / 92
PROJECT: Trooicana Flood Insurance Studv
DESCRIPTION: Flood Insurance Rate MaD DreDaration for the TroDicana Wash to the confluence with thg
Flaminao Wash. Base Flood Elevation determination for north, central and southern branches and aDDroximaB
limits determined for minor tributaries.
PERCENT COMPLETE: 80 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 213,600
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: 01 / 15 / 93
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: CH2M Hill /Ted Davis, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
Project is on schedule. -
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Detailed hydraulic model was completed and reviewed by the district. Break-over analysis a t UPRR and 1-1 5 has been completed and reviewed by the District. Supplemental topographic mapping to be supplied to Michael Baker Jr., Inc. for use in Duck/Blue Diamond study has been completed.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Work maps to be drafted. Stream profiles to be prepared. Final report to be drafted for District and entity review.
PROJECT MANAGER: KEVIN EUBANKS. P.E. PHONE #: 455-3139
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROI DISTRICT Date Prepared: 10/01/92
Review Period From: 09/01/92 To 09/30/92
PROJECT: TroDicanalFlaminao Washes (AREA 2) Riaht-of-Wav Acauisition Plan
DESCRIPTION: Produce a centerline alianment. leaal descrietions. riaht-of-wav maDs and BLM riaht-of-wav
BDDlications for the U. S. Armv CorDs of Fnaineers TroDicana/Flaminao Washes Proiect located nenerallv
mstream from the DroDosed TroDicana Wash Detention Basin excludina Area 1.
PERCENT COMPLETE: 20 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: 9 150.960
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) March 1993
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: Church EnQineerina of Nevada, Inc. / Todd Kenner, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Complete alternative alignment analysis
Meet with Corps .of Engineers to present alternative alignments.
PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM., FRASER, 11. P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39
-57-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 10/01/92
Review Period From: 09/01/92 To 09/30/92
PROJECT: M
DESCRIPTION: Perform a Master Plan w t e of the MoaDa Vallev which includes the communities of MoaDa,
Glendale, Looandale and Overton.
PERCENT COMPLETE: 10 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 120,000
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) Mav 1993
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: James M. Montaomerv Consultina Enaineers Inc. / Lonnie Rov, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
None.
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Completed reconnaissance, begin hydrologic modelling.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Complete hydrologic modelling, begin alternative development.
PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM.. FRASER. 11. P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39
-58-
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: BEGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared: 10/01/92
Review Period From: 09/01/92 To 09/30/92
PROJECT: TroDicana/Flaminao Washes (AREA 1) Riaht-of-Wav Acauisition Plan
DESCRIPTION: Produce a centerline alimment. leaal descriotions. riaht-of-wav maos and BLM right-of-way
molications for the U. S. Armv Cams of Engineers Trooicana/Flaminao Washes Proiect located aenerallv
wstream from the Umer Flamingo Wash Detention Basin
PERCENT COMPLETE: 40 % ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 157,000
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) March 1993
CONSULTANT/PROJECT MANAGER: G. C. Wallace, Inc. / Calvin Black, P.E.
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS:
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH:
Complete record of survey, complete alternative aliQnment analysis.
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
Meet with Corps of Engineers to present alternative alignments. Y
I
PROJECT MANAGER: GALE WM., FRASER. I I . P.E. PHONE #: 455-31 39 -59-
8
8
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Entity: REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT Date Prepared:Seotember 29. 1992
Review Period From: 911 I92 To 9130192
PROJECT: FLOOD AWARENESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM
DESCRIPTION: ImDlement a flood awareness and safetv mooram to inform residents of the danaers of
PoodinQ. Work is accomDlished both bv RFCD staff and a consultant.
PERCENT COMPLETE: 95 % (consultant): onaoina for staff
ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: $ 1 50,000 (consultant)
SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION: (Dates) vear-round Droaram
CONSULTANTIPROJECT MANAGER: Merica. Burch & Dickerson
DELAYS OR PROBLEM AREAS: ~~~~
NONE
WORK COMPLETED DURING CURRENT MONTH: ~~~
See attached
WORK TO BE COMPLETED DURING NEXT MONTH:
See attached
PROJECT MANAGER: CATHY RAZOR PHONE #: 455-31 39 -60.
FLOOD AWARENESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM STATUS WORK ACCOMPLISHED DURING SEPTF.MBER. 1992
Fox - 5 Kids Club "Info-mercials" run 12 times per week through the six-month period of April through September. This method of reaching local children has been very effective. The show's mascot, "Rusty the Fox", has made appearances at several District sponsored children's flash flood safety presentations. Our sponsorship of this program ended at the end of September. The fall edition of "Totally Kids" Magazine included a flash flood safety tip on the back cover.
Skvview Traffic ReDOrtg During September, we concluded our placement of flash flood spots on these traffic reports. Ten second public service announcements were made over 18 radio stations eight times per month.
NewsDaDer Wramers Two million newspaper wrapper bags were printed and distributed to Review Journal deliverers. The bags are to be used on days where rain is expected . In addition, the RJ uses another 16,000 wrappers each day for customers who require protective wrapping on their paper. The bags were received in August and will be used until the supply is depleted.
Billboards Three messages are being used. DONREY placed 16 billboards during the month of September for a 50% saturation level. This concludes the placement of flood safety billboards for this year.
Flash Flood Safetv VideQ The District video "Desert Storms Can Be Breathtaking" has again been broadcast over Channel 10 and the Clark County School District's closed circuit system during the month of September. We have had several requests for additional materials to be used and distributed in the classroom.
Sanitation Billinas Both the City of Las Vegas and the Clark County Sanitation Departments have been placing flash flood safety notices in their billings.
Lake Mead Recreation Area The Park Rangers have agreed to distribute flash flood safety materials to visitors a t eleven areas of the Lake Mead area. The flood safety video will also been shown at the visitor's center on a regular basis.
-61-
Brochure Distribution The brochures continue to be distributed in a variety of situations including public counter, public meetings, and at presentations made. At the request of the Citizens Advisory Committee, a flyer has been added to the brochure to invite citizens to meetings of the committee.
School Presentations A presentation was made to first and second graders a t the Whitney Elementary School on September 10.
Arrangements are now being made to participate in a safety fair a t Harriet Treem Elementary School on November 4. Staff is assisting the school PTA to involve a network of safety-related organizations.
In an effort to be included in regular school curriculum, District staff has confirmed its participation in the Nevada State Science Teachers Convention to be held in Las Vegas on November 6-7. Tim Sutko will make a 50 minute presentation to the teachers, and Cathy Razor will distribute printed information and show the video at a booth.
Citizens Advisorv Committee At the request of the Citizens Advisory Commitee, press releases were issued to local newspapers, radio and TV stations to invite the public to the CAC meetings. Staff additionally prepared a brochure insert to inform the public about future CAC meeting dates.
-62-
CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
I SUBJECT: FINANCIAL REPORTS I PETITIONER: VIRGINIA VALENTINE. P.E., GENERAL MANAGEWCHIEF 1 ENGINEER
~ ~ ~~~~
RECOMMENDATION OF PETITIONER: THAT THE BOARD ACCEPT THE REPORTS ..I
FISCAL IMPACT: None .
BACKGROUND: The following Financial Reports for the Month of August 1992. are submitted for your review:
Section DescriDtion Paeeo A Fund 286: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-7
Fund Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Sales Tax Revenue Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Monthly Expenditure Report ..................... 3-4 Open Purchase Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ILA Approved . Not yet transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
B Fund 330: Fund Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
C Fund 443: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9-28 Fund Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Monthly Expenditure Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10-1 1 ILA Approved . Not yet transferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Accounts Payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Project Expense/ILA Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14-19 Project Expense Summary ..................... 20-24 Work Maintenance Program Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25-26 Projects List ............................. 27-28
D Fund 444: ............................... 29-34 Fund Balance Report .......................... 29 Monthly Expenditure Report ..................... 30 Accounts Payable ............................ 31
Bond Projects Funding Status Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Project ExpenseALA Balance Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32-33
E Funding Request & Priorities Repodsum . . . . . . . . . . . 35-39
Respectfully submitted. r I I 1
Dennis L . Johnson .
TAC AGENDA
Date: 10/8/92 Date: 9/24/92 ITEM# 11 lTEM#4 RFCD AGENDA
Manager. Business & Finance . . . . . . . . . ... T - . . . . * - f
* FUND 286 - FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AUGUST 1992
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE AB 494 Funds (Incl Cum Interest) Unused Tax Revenues
TOTAL BALANCE
REVENUES : Sales Tax Interest Earned (AUG $208,723 - ADJWT $598,393) Sale of Materials Other Property Tax Revenue Adjustment (July 92)
TOTAL REVENUES
EXPENSES : Salaries & Benefits Supplies & Services Professional Services Capital Expenditures Transfer to Fund 443
TOTAL EXPENSES
ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 286)
OBLIGATIONS AGAINST FUND BALANCE: P.O. Balances - Prof Serv and Operating Costs ILA's Approved-funds not yet transfered to Fund 443 ILA's Approved- funds not yet transfered back to Fund 286 Bond Fund 330 - Principal & Interest Accrual Accounts Payable
TOTAL FUND OBLIGATIONS
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR COMMITMENT
CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS
PROJECT SCOPE
~~ ~ ~~
NLV.PENDING W. TRIBUTARY OF LAS VEGAS WASH @ CAMINO AL NORTE
TOTAL REQUESTS FOR FUNDING
BALANCE FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\FUNDBAL
SALES TAX REVENUE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1992/1993
DIFFERENCE MONTH SALES 1/4 CENT SALES SALES TAX OVER/(UNDER) CUM REVENUE TAX RECEIVED TAX ESTIMATE REVENUES FROM ESTIMATE FY 92/93
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
1,919,727 1,877,861 (41,866) 1,877 , 861 l,88O,600 1,968,253 87,653 3,846,114
1,827,050
1,849,400
1,865,550
1,804,900
1,852,950
2,050,800
1,695,300
1 , 658 , 800 1,902 , 125 1,832,900
TOTAL: 22 , 140,102 3,846,114 45,787 3,846,114
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\SALESTAX
2
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 MONTH ENDING AUGUST 1992
PROCE S S VENDOR P.O. EXPENSE INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE DATE NAME NUMBER CLASS NUMBER DATE AMOUNT ................................................................ _______
SALARIES & BENEFITS: AUGUST 92 RFCD EMPLOYEES SALARIES 5000 46,123.45 AUGUST 92 RFCD EMPLOYEES BENEFITS 6000 15,128.86
61,252.31 TOTAL --------------
SUPPLIES & SERVICES:
07.22.92 07.23.92 07.23.92 08.21.92 08.12.92 08.05.92 08.04.92 08.21.92 08.04.92 38.12.92 08.04.92 08.07.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.05.92 08.12.92 08.04.92 08.12.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.04.92 08.21.92
AC HOUSTON LUMBER FEDERAL EXPRESS FEDERAL EXPRESS CC TREASURER RALPH JONES DISPLAY A C HOUSTON LUMBER PRO-PROCESS VALCOM COMPUTER CC TREASURER CC TREASURER TEACHERS REALTY TEACHERS REALTY CC TREASURER ATCT CENTEL CENTEL CENTEL CELLULAR DIGITAL EQUIP CORP XEROX CORP XEROX CORP CC TREASURER FEDERAL EXPRESS CC TREASURER CC TREASURER CC TREASURER MERCURY BLUEPRINT AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC LAS VEGAS BUSINESS PRESS
34277 3550 3550 3550 35541 34277 34563 35142 3550 3550 34367 34367 3550 3550 3550 3550 3550 34720 19037 35697 3550 3550 3550 3550 3550 33489 3550 3550
7030 001-432516 7250 470823246 7250 470207600 7010 44119 7010 4324 7030 426360 7030 14766 7060 011242 7089 44182 7110 41866 7120 080192 7120 080592 7130 43573 7140 081192 7140 060892 7140 070892 7140 082092 7240 155030293 7240 33520056 7240 14726649 7250 44139 7250 472833286 7270 082192 7280 44124 7280 44113 7280 92A12189 7310 44206 7310 27263
07.17.92 07.15.92 07.09.92 08.14.92 07.21.92 07.02.92 07.21.92 08.07.92 07.22.92 08.10.92 08.01.92 08.05.92 08.12.92 08.11.92 06.08.92 07.08.92 08.20.92 08.04.92 06.11.92 06.29.92 08.03.92 08.05.92 08.21.92 08.19.92 08.14.92 08.10.92 07.09.92 08.03.92
11.60 24.50 48.00 453.30 130.00 11.60 52.35 15.50
28,678.00 280.12 62.40
7,982.77 410.00 169.51 847.75 913.04 100.53 292.00 362.66 212.94 631.19 21.75 14.39 564.08 560.30 32.75 55.00 48.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
08.21.92 CH2M HILL 33280 7210 207227 08.10.92 41 ,333.40 08.12.92 CONSTRUCTION INFO SYSTEMS 31539 7210 92109 07.21.92 585.00 08.12.92 CONSTRUCTION INFO SYSTEMS 31539 72 10 92095 06.24.92 675.00
3
- * - - - l -
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286 MONTH ENDING AUGUST 1992
PROCESS DATE
VENDOR NAME
P.O. EXPENSE INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER CLASS NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
08.12.92 08.12.92 08.12.92 08.12.92 08.12.92 08.04.92 08.12.92 08.21.92 08.04.92
CONSTRUCTION INFO SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION INFO SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION INFO SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION INFO SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION INFO SYSTEMS DAMES & M O O R E JAMES MONTGOMERY MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON WILL & m s
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
08.21.92 AVNET COMPUTER 08.21.92 AVNET COMPUTER 08.21.92 AVNET COMPUTER 08.12.92 AVNET COMPUTER
TRANSFERS TO FUND 443:
31539 31539 31539 31539 31539 76007 16902 29184 10136
7210 92110 7210 92118 7210 92115 7210 92119 7210 92094 7210 001-06420 7210 NV1834 7210 004-4900 7210 072192
07.21.92 1,485.00 08.05.92 1,575.00 07.21.92 990.00 08.05.92 765.00 06.24.92 1,620.00 07.24.92 . 175.18 07.31.92 19,656.40 07.01.92 17,188.12 07.21.92 1,938.59
87,986.69 --------------
34726 8040 55216689 08.07.92 1,010.00 34726 8040 55217523 08.13.92 2,509.08 34726 8040 55216927 08.10.92 4,977.60 34726 8040 55216546 08.06.92 16,348.08
24,844.76 --------------
HEMENWAY VALLEY WASH (BOUOlA87) MWP FY92-93 NORTH LAS VEGAS MWP FY92-93 LAS VEGAS WASHINGTON AVE CONVEYANCE (LAS09D92) MWP - CLARK COUNTY , MESQUITE AND HENDERSON (FY92-93) SUNSET DET BASIN, COLLECTION SYSTEM (HEN05A92) VAN BUSKIRK DET BASIN PROJECT (CLA03C90) BOULDER CITY MAINTENANCE WORK PLAN 92-93 PROJECT CLOSE-OUTS
150,000.00 50,880.00 588,000.00
2,437,000.00 1,473,026.50 1,385,000.00 275,000.00 85,800.00
(228,876.87) -------------- 6,215,829.63
TOTAL EXPENDITURES/TRANSFERS 6,432,899.42 =iDllllPIIlPltP
FILE: FINFtPTS\FUND286\MNTHEXPS
4
FUND 286 OPEN PURCHASE ORDERS AUGUST 1992
WILL & MUYS 7210 JM MONTGOMERY 7210 XEROX 7240 SHOSHONA S 7210 TEACHER’S REALTY 7120 NEVADA PHOTO 7280 MERICA, BURCH & DICKERSON 7210 CH2M HILL 7210 MERCURY BLUEPRINT 7280 HANDAR 7240 AHERN RENTERS 7120 AC HOUSTON LUMBER 7030 SEARS 7060 TEACHERS REALTY 7120 PRO-PROCESS 7030 AVNET COMPUTER 8040 KAVOURAS, INC 804017330 HANDAR, INC 8040 GARRETT OFFICE FURNITURE 8040 JALCOM 8040 CENTEL CELLULAR 7060 VALCOM 8040 MICROSOFT CORP 7060 G.C. WALLACE, INC 7210 CHURCH ENGINEERING 7210 ORACLE CORP 7330 XEROX 7240 HOLMAN‘S OF NEVADA 7010 DESERT DECOR 7010 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 7210 DAMES & MOORE 7210 PRODUCTION COMPANY 7210 LODGE GRAPHICS 7280
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\PO-BALJ
10136 16902 19037 21736 24463 28303 29184 33280 33483 34113 34270 34277 34301 34367 34563 34726 35043 35047 35412 35449 35463 35496 35499 35530 35531 35619 35697 35758 35759
76007 36415 36467
35899
20,000.00 240,000.00
5,241.60 1,500.00
80,964.78 300.00
150,000.00 270,400.00
2,000.00 3,000.00
750.00 500.00 250.00
93,939.48 750.00
41,067.31 18,175.00 52,834.00
457.00 990.81
30.00 353.46 297.00
157,000.00 150,960.00
3,135.00 5,000.00
100.00 400.00
112,500.00 744,846.00
300.00 1,061.00
18,481.79 239,765.88
3,422.31 970.00
76,467.70 265.84
97,589.91 41,333.40
32.75 0.00 0.00
23.20 0.00
8,045.17 52.35
24,844.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00
212.94 0.00 0.00 0.00
401,316.32 0 .00 0.00
1,518.21 234.12
1,819.29 530.00
4,497.08 34.16
52,410.09 229,066.60
1,967.25 3,000.00
750.00 476.80 250.00
85,894.31 697.65
16,222.55 18,175.00 52,834.00
457.00 990.81
30.00 353.46 297.00
157,000.00 150,960.00
3,135.00 4,787.06
100.00 400.00
112,500.00 343,529.68
300.00 1,061.00
5
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED TO FUND 443 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286
PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD SCOPE FISCAL NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE . IMPACT ............................................................................................
ILA'S APPROVED IN JULY: LAS.04.B.90 5 07.09.92 OAKEY BLVD DET & CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT LAS.OZ.D.92 8 07.09.92 ANGEL PARK-PECCOLE 1 (RAMPART STORM DESIGN) LAS.12.A.92 9 07.09.92 BUFFALO CHANNEL DESIGN (DOE-WESTCLIFF) LAS.03.B.89 10 07.09.92 GOWAN OUTFALL & CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT
50,000 65,000 93,000 26,000
234,000 ------------
ILA'S APPROVED IN AUGUST: CLA.03.D.91 11B 08.13.92 VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL DESIGN NLV.Ol.B.87 13 08.13.92 LAS VEGAS WASH CRAIG-CIVIC CENTER LAS.12.A.92 8C 08.13.92 ALTA STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION
200,000 60,000 954,800
1,214,800
ILA'S APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER: BOU.01.A.87 6 HEMENWAY WASH 160,000 LAS.13.A.92 5 CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO DR TO GOWAN S. DET BASIN 67,000 ---------.
227, (
TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED BACK TO FUND 286 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286
PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE
SCOPE FISCAL IMPACT
NONE THIS PERIOD
TOTAL TRANSFERS BACK TO FUND 286
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\ILA-PEND
6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FOR AUGUST 1992 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286
PROCESS DATE
08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 08.21.92 07.22.92 07.22.92
VENDOR NAME
HANDAR, INC KAVOURAS, INC VALCOM COMPUTER VALCOM COMPUTER MERCURY BLUEPRINT MERCURY BLUEPRINT
P.O. NUMBER
35047 35043 35496 35449 33483 33483
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND286\ACCPAY
PROJECT #/ INVOICE INVOICE EXP CLASS NUMBER DATE
8040 12327 08.13.92 8040 22041 08.10.92 8040 011360 08.18.92 8040 011285 08.11.92 7280 10732-104 07.14.92 7280 9631-450 07.20.92
INVOICE AMOUNT .------------ 889.71
14,525.00 353.46 990.81 3.00 13.00
FUND 330 FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AUGUST 31, 1992
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
REVENUES : INTEREST INCOME TREASURER'S INTEREST ADJUSTMENT
EXPENSES : NONE THIS PERIOD
ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 330)
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND33O\FUNDBAL
36,413
200 (2,506.69)
0
FUND 443 FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AUGUST 31, 1992
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
REVENUES : TRANSFER IN FROM FUND 286 RETURN OF FUNDS TO FUND 286
EXPENSES : 9999 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3560 - MAINTENANCE WORK PROGRAM
ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 443)
COMMITTED IMPACTS TO FUND BALANCE: ILA's APPROVED IN JULY ILA's APPROVED IN AUGUST ILA'e APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
TOTAL COMMITMENTS
COMMITTED FUND BALANCE (FUND 443)
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\FUNDBAL
22,852,172
6,444,707 (228,877) ------------
6,215,830
(1,478,661) (45,966) ------------
(1,524,627)
234,000 1,214,800 227,000 (122,443) ------------
1,553,357
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
443 08.12.92 MAX RIGGS CONST 443 08.12.92 BLACK & VEATCH 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.21.92 CONTRI CONSTRUCTION 443 08.12.92 G C WALLACE 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.21.92 DELTA ENG 443 08.21.92 PENTACORE ENG 443 08.04.92 PENTACORE ENGINEERING 443 08.04.92 SEA INCORPORATED 443 08.04.92 TAB CONTRACTORS 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 BOYLE ENGINEERING 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CITY OF HENDERSON 443 08.04.92 CITY OF HENDERSON 443 08.04.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 443 08.12.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 443 08.12.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 443 08.04.92 CITY OF LAS VEGAS 443 08.12.92 GREINER, INC 443 08.04.92 CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGA 443 08.12.92 CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGA 443 08.12.92 CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGA 443 08.12.92 CITY OF HENDERSON
WORK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM EXPENDITURES
443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 08.04.92 CC TREASURER 443 07.15.92 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 443 07.15.92 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 443 07.15.92 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS 443 08.25.92 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
28874 BOUOlA87 65832 CLA01A87 28143 CLA02E91 28876 CLA03B90 25498 CLA03B90 28153 CLAO3B90 28156 CLA03D91 28145 CLAO3D91 28155 CLA03D91 28155 CLA03D91 29354 CLA03D91 28016 CLA04A89 23856 CLA04C90 28875 CLA05A91 30698 CLA06A91 28883 CLA06A91 65831 HEN01A87 31270 HEN04A91
3 LAS03B89 18446 LAS04B90 18846 LAS04B90 13505 LAS08A89
6 MOAO2B92 23137 NLV03C91 3213 NLV04A89 26070 NLV06A91
14 HEN03A91
30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 30742 CLA91-92 32241 CLA91-92 32241 CLA91-92 32241 CLA91-92 32241 CLA91-92
7 039223 40981 40983
6 9
41000 3608
7 6
LV18937 7
40980 40982
4 40979 013583 013580 8114 8057 7941 8113 60814
AR2213 AR2217 AR2218 071492
40994 40995 40996 40992 40999 40991 40990 40998 40997 40993 5410-5 4449-4 5372-7 6958
07.25.92 07.22.92 07.30.92 07.30.92 07.17.92 07.22.92 07.30.92 08.04.92 08.10.92 07.10.92 07.23.92 07.21.92 07.30.92 07.30.92 07.09.92 07.30.92 07.14.92 07.14.92 07.22.92 06.25.92 05.27.92 07.22.92 07.24.92 07.31.92 08.04.92 08.05.92 07.14.92
07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 07.29.92 06.26.92 06.10.92 06.26.92 06.30.92
186,215.35 4,012.77 10,168.77
250.36 63,995.49 6,948.83 4,555.39 22 , 545.60
100.00 1,413.00 31,834.57 22,610.00 1,041.76
55.41 20,812.?'
812, 961.,.
1,327.30 522,447.50 5,768.06 4,501.39
493,126.10 6,372.77 21,169.45 10,820.00 33,942.02
852.82
1,478,660.92 --------------
300.71 932.22 60.15 192.71 316.61
1,010.21 1,006.94 4,462.22 1,331.16 1,069.59
970.
287.60
15.'
946 tr
10
* MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 MONTH ENDING AUGUST 1992
FUND PROCESS VENDOR x DATE NAME
P.O. PROJECT # INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER EXP CLASS NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
45,965.61
CONTRACTOR RETENTION INTEREST PAYMENTS: NONE THIS PERIOD
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\MNEXPRPT TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,524,626.53 ==============
11
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - FUND 443 AUGUST 1992
PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE
SCOPE FISCAL IMPACT
ILA'S APPROVED IN JULY: LAS.04.B.90 5 07.09.92 OAKEY BLVD DET & CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT 50,000 LAS.OZ.D.92 8 07.09.92 ANGEL PARK-PECCOLE 1 (RAMPART STORM DESIGN) 65,000 LAS.12.A.92 9 07.09.92 BUFFALO CHANNEL DESIGN (DOE-WESTCLIFF) 93,000 LAS.03.B.89 10 07.09.92 GOWAN OUTFALL & CONVEYANCE SUPPLEMENT 26,000
234,000
ILA'S APPROVED IN AUGUST: CLA.03.D.91 11B 08.13.92 VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL DESIGN NLV.Ol.B.87 13 08.13.92 LAS VEGAS WASH CRAIG-CIVIC CENTER LAS.12.A.92 8C 08.13.92 ALTA STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION
200,000 60,000 954,800
1,214,800 -----------
ILA'S APPROVED IN SEPTEMBER: BOU.Ol.A.87 6 HEMENWAY WASH 160,000 LAS.13.A.92 5 CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO DR TO G O W A N S. DET BASIN 67,000
----------r
227,OO
TOTAL TRANSFERS TO FUND 443 1,675,800 PttPPlfll'=
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS APPROVED - FUNDS NOT YET TRANSFERED BACK TO FUND 286 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 286
PROJECT AGENDA RFCD BOARD NUMBER ITEM APPRVL DATE
SCOPE FISCAL IMPACT
NONE THIS PERIOD
FILE: FINRPTS\FVND443\ILA_PEND
12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FOR AUGUST 1992 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443
PROCESS DATE
VENDOR P.0. PROJECT INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NAME NUMBER # NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
08.21.92 SWIFT BLUEPRINT 08.21.92 MEA 08.21.92 GREINER, INC 08.21.92 CNLV
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\ACCPAY
PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUN0 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
CLARK COUNTY:
CLA.Ol.A.87 Upper Flamingo Uash 7,713,000.00 668,155.00 Detention Basin 58,000.01 & Outfal l 12,499.00
2 - 000 .oo 1,212i536.30 157,984.00 406.732.45
CLA.02.0.90 Rawhide Channel Eastern t o Topaz
CLA.OZ.E.91 Rswhide Chamel R c L d t o Mtn. Vista
1,265,000.00 93,150.00
907,322.80 77, 000.00
1,077,472.80 - -__- - - - - - - - - - - -
180,000.00 65,000.00 610.00
CLA.03.B.90 Van Buskirk Channel 3,760,000.00 80,141.25 49,293.00
Outfa1 1 18,000.00 277.44
151,081 .OO 3,011,832.00
3,310,624.69 - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
CLA.03.C.90 V m Busk R i g h t - a
. i r k Channel If -Yay
CLA.03.0.91 V m Buskirk System Spencer t o Rochelle Rochelle t o Twain
3,575,000.00 15,000.00
130,505.20 10,850.00
1,115,000.00 1,253,878.50 632,321.00 - - -_ - - - - - - - - - - - -
3,157,554.70
650,000.00 77,250 .OO 15,000.00
50,000.00
Black & Veatch C.C. Treasurer Timothy Horse Nat ionel Ti t le Stewart T i t l e
Nevada T i t l e Lawyers T i t l e
Clerk of C o u r t Uheeler Const.
G.C. Yallace Clark Cwnty Head.Vly. Con.
Clark Cwnty S w i f t
Clark Cwnty Clark Cwnty Converse Cons. S w i f t Blprtg. G.C. Vatlace Contri C o n s t .
Clark Covlty K.E. Lad) Steuart T i t l e Clerk of Court Land T i t l e o f NV Nevada T i t l e
Clark Cwnty Delta Engineering MEA
4,012.77 0 .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
654,181.70 13,973.30 35,345.16 22,654.85 12,499.00 0.00 2,000.00 0.00
406,732.45 0.00
1,212,536.30 0.00' 157,984.00 0.00
427,500.00 0.00 4,078,476.85 66,472.15
0.00 65,493.05 7,656.95 0.00 65,660.10 11,339.90 0.00 849,092.18 58,230.62
10,168.77 27,433.66 37,566.34 0.00 234.90 375.10
0.00 250.36 0.00 0.00
63,995.49 6,948.83
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
22,545.60 4,555.39
0.00
60,141.25 P.O. CLOSED OUT 46,062.20 18.000.00
2,410.80 0.00
277.44 0.00 93,371 I05 57,709.95
2,986,832.00 25,000.00
13,746.83 1,253.17 10,850.00 0.00 130,505.20 0.00
1,115,000.00 0.00 1,253,878.50 0.00 632,321 -00 0.00
10,019.27 4,980.73 62,212.40 15,037.60 34,434.42 15,565.58
14
0
9
E
'9 N
N
.. .....
-sips
c c
r
00
00
00
00
00
0
0
0
00
0
99
99
9
9
8888
> I ,
I
I
I
0
0
0
In
3
0-
2
.C
L
m
3 L 0
Y
Y 0
.. u, d p:
<
8 + 9 n
B c
c
0: 5
vi 9 5 u
PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLUXL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
LAU.OZ.A.89 Lwgh l i n Hiko Springs
LAU.02.B.92 Laughlin Hiko Springs - Remap
MOA.01.B.89 Moape Valley Muddy River West Levee
MOA.02.A.W Moapa Valley logan Uash (aka Benson Uash)
MoA.02.B.92 M o a p a Valley-Logan Uash (Construction)
NEL.Ol.A.88 Nelson F l o o d Control Inprwclrmts
SEA.01 A 8 8 Searchlight F l o o d Control
C I T Y OF BOULDER CITY:
BOU.01 A87 Hcnmwsy
lnprovclrmts
Wash
358,763.97
370.000.00 106.04 Review Journal 4,143.W Clark County
318,000.00 Boyle Engineers
370,000.00
47,750.00 Simons, L i
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
9,500.00 1,500.00 Clark County 8,000.00 Boyle Eng
9,500.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
200,000.00 10,000.00 Clark County 43.00 Review Journal
180,000.00 The Mark G r o r p
190,043.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
340,000.00 39,933.96 Clark County
209,960.00 D a m s & Moore 106.04 Revieu Journal
300.00 Appraisal Serv. 58,560.00 Clerk of the Court
600.00 UPRR 4,938.00 Nevada T i t l e Co. - - - - - - - - - - - -
314,398.00
4,216,000.00 238,000.00 Greincr, I n c .
70,000.00 12,000.00 Clark County
172,000.00 22,300.00 Clark County 35,500.00 G.C. Wallace
57,800.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4,489,000.00 94,938.84 J.M.Montgomery 765.00 E.G. Radig
186,33a.oo. coe & Van LOO 25,769.25 C/Boulder City
16
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6,372.77
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
106.04 1,407.34
315,730.06 47,750.00
0.00 0.00
4,025.58 43.00
158,563.09
10,535.55 106.04
209,WO.OO 300.00
58,560.00 600.00
4,938.00
6,372.77
2,961 .%
7,452.35 0.00
94,938.84 765.00
177,227.59 25,769.25
2,736.62 0.00
0.00 2,269.94
8,000.00 1,500.00
5,974.42
21,416.91 0.00
29,398.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
231,627.23
9,038.05
14,847.65 35,500.00
’ 0.00 0.00
9,110.41 0.00
PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOO CONTROL DISTRICT
C I T Y OF HENDERSOll:
HEN.01.A.87 Pittnmn Uash Channel
HEN.01.C.90 Pittnmn Uash Channel
HEN.03.A.91 UPRR Channel
HEN.M.A.91 C - 1 Ch-1 mtm
HEN.05.A.92 S m e t Det Basin/ Collect ion & Outfal l
C I T Y OF LAS VEGAS:
LAS.Ol.A.87 Angel Park Detention Basin Outflow Structure
LAS.02.A.87 Buffalo Channel (aka Angel Park/Gowan Detention Basin)
4,031,188.91 Wax Riggs Const 186,215.35
4,339,000.00 _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
937,000.00 562,225.00 C/Henderson 9,775.00 Transmap
240,000.00 Poggemeyer
812,000.00 _ _ _ - _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
w1.69 0.00 0.00
3,000,000.00 142,471 .OO C/Henderson 0.00 2,729,375.00 Superior Gmite 0.00
125,154.00 Black L Veatch 0.00 3,000.00 Nevada Labor Comn 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
3,000,000.00
150,000.00 99,050.00 G.C. Uallace 25,000.00 C/Henderson _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
124,050.00
600,000.00 60.000.00 C/Hcnders& 540,000.00 VTN Nevada
600,000.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0.00 852.82
1,327.30 0.00
1,385,000.00 0.00 0.00
400,300.00 45,432.15 G.C. Uallace 354,867.85 C/Las Vegas _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ 400,300.00
4,535,%5.00 217,211.95 G.C. Uallace 4,314,753.05 C/Las Vegas
4,000.00 Kmnedy/Jenks - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4,535.965.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00
2,017,896.15
286,441.47 9,m.oo
200,501.46
90,820.77
3,000.00
2,303,130.60 120,054.63
99,050.00 7,251.81
202,424.26 7,512.09
0.00
45,432.15 346,114.26
212,211.95
4,000.00 3,824,369.32
2,013,292.76
275,783.53 0.00
39,498.54
426,244.40 51,650.23
5,099.37 0.00
17,748.19 0.00
337,5T5.74 52,457.91
0.00
8,753.59 0.00
490,383.73 5,000.00
0.00
PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPOR1 FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOO CONTROL DISTRICT
LAS.OZ.C.91 Buffalo Channel 588,898.00 588,898.00 C/Las Vegas Westcl i f f to SIlmerlin
(aka Angel Park/Gowan Detention Basin)
LAS.OZ.D.92 Buffalo Channel Des ign 93,000.00 0 .oo Doc-Westcliff
0.00 789.25 588,108.75
0.00 0.00 0.00
LAS.03.B.89 G o u a n Detention Basins 5,401,000.00 694,040.00 Poggemeyer 0.00 660,726.00 25,314.00 522,447.50 1,328,215.93 3,375,558.07 L Outfal l 4,703,774.00 C/Las Vegas
LAS.04.6.90 Oakey Blvd. System 562,000.00 471,645.00 Boyle Engr. 0.00 444,121.65 I , 523.35 90,355.00 C/Las Vegas 10,269.45 49,284.90 41,070.10 ---- - - - - - - - - - - - -
562,000.00
LAS.04.C.92 Oakey Blvd. System 35,000.00 35,000.00 C/Las Vegas Decatur Crossing
0.00 35,000.00 CLOSED
LAS.W.A.89 Carey Avcnuc/Lake Mead 6,750,000.00 6,750,000.00 C/Las Vegas 493,126.10 5,646,636.81 1,103,363.19 Detention 8 C o r n . System
LAS.W.A.89 Washington A v e n u e 542 , 000.00 292,000.00 M.E.A. System 35,000.00 C/Las Vegas _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _
327,000.00
LAS.W.B.91 Washington A v e n u e System 471,000.00 471,000.00 C/Las Vegas
LAS.W.D.92 Washington A v e System 2,437,000.00 0.00
Sandhill t o Bruce
Construction
0.00 290,481 .81 0.00
1,518.19 21,768.89 13,231.11
0.00 58,120.81 412,879.19
0.00 0.00 0.00
LAS.lO.A.91 Gouan North Channel 100,o0O.00 100,000.00 C/Las Vegas 0.00 T3,866.28 26,133.72
1’
.
!
i
PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOW CONTROL DISTRICT
MES.01.8.89 Town Uash Det. Basin 660,000.00 50,000.00 C/Mesquite 0.00 610,000.00 CHZW Hill 0.00 592,785.13
30,8E.00 19,125.00 17,214.87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
660,000.00
C I T Y OF NORTH LAS VEGAS:
NLV.Ol.B.87 L.V. Uash/Craig to C iv ic 2,380,600.00 645,088.00 C/N.Las Vegas C t r . (aka King Charles 1,735,512.00 Max Riggs - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2,380,600.00
NLV.03.A.88 Uest Range Uash 360,000.00 M 0 , O O O . O O C/N.Las Vegas Detention Basin
0.00 632,617.08 12,470.92 0.00 1,672,314.68 63,197.32
0.00 307,984.25 52,015.75
NLV.03.C.91 Uest Range Uash 350,000.00 350,000.00 C/N.Las Vegas 21,169.45 183,962.20 166,037.60
ILV.M.A.89 Gowan Detention Basins 13,420,000.00 1,366,000.00 C/N.Las Vegas 10,820.DO 978,914.54 387,085.46 Outfall Structure 11,685,198.00 LV Paving 0.00 10,941,763.29 743 , 434.71
Diversion Dike
--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13,051,198.00
NLV.05.A.89 Upper L.V. Uash 1,650,000.00 1,650,000.00 C/N.Las Vegas Detention Basin
0.00 1,595.142.36 54,1157.64
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\PE-ILABR
19
PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL PROJECT PROJECT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT NUMBER NAME DATE AMOUNT EXPIRATION DATE EXPENDED REMAINING
CLARK COUNTY:
CLA.Ol.A.87 U per Flamingo Waah Jul 9, 1987 440,000.00 July 31, 1992 6,987,255.46 725,744.54 getention Basin Sepf. 14, 1989 2,081,000.00 & Outfall Dec. 13, 1990 5,819,000.00
Apr. 11, 1991 (627,000.00)
CLA.02.D.90 Rawhide Channel July 12, 1990 100,000.00 Dec. 31, 1991 1,000,245.33 264,754.67 Eastern to Topaz Oct. 11, 1990 1,165,000.00
TOTAL 1,265,000.00 ---------------
CLA.02.E.91 Rawhide Channel Oct. 10, 1991 180,000.00 July 1, 1992 27,668.56 152,331.44 Mcleod to Mtn. Vista
. CLA.03.B.90 Van Buskirk Channel June 14, 1990 300,000.00 Apr. 17, 1992 3,225,503.94 534,496.06 Outfall Aug. 8, 1991 3,460,000.00
TOTAL 3,760,000.00 ---------------
cLA.03.C.90 Van Buekirk Channel Oct. 11, 1990 2,000,000.00 Jan. 31, 1992 3,156,301.53 418,698.47 Rrght-of-Way Aug. 8, 1991 1,300,000.00
Jun 11, 1992 275,000.00 --------------- TOTAL 3,575,000.00
CLA.03.D.91 Van Buskirk Channel Se t. 12, 1991 360,000.00 July 1, 1992 314,682.29 335,317.71 Spencer to Rochelle Oce. 10, 1991 290,000.00 July 1, 1992 Maryland at Reno; --------------- Tropicana at S ncer; Between RochelE & Twain
at Eastern Avenue
at Paradise and July 12, 1990 450,000.00 Palos Verde Aprrl 11, 1991 300,000.00
June 13, 1991 202,000.00 TOTAL 1,702,000.00
650,000.00
CLA.04.A.89 Flamingo Wash Bridge Sept. 14, 1989 61,900.00 Dec. 31, 1990 22,610.00 39,290.00
CLA.04.C.90 Flamingo Waah Brdgs. July 12, 1990 750,000.00 Dec. 31, 1991 1,569,627.90 132,372.10
--------------- CLA.05.A.91 Duck Creek Channel Sept. 12, 1991 100,000.00 Oct 1, 1992 37,149.15 107,850.85
W d
03 0
d
00 W
VI 0
m
0
m
rl
d
0
cy VI 0
I- 00
(Y
m
W
0
cy 0
rl m rl VI rl d .
m
d
W . 2
0
00 0
VI d
m
m
'l-
m
. .
.
0 0 0 .
d
cy W
d
m l- 0
0
. m
m . VI
. .
In VI
m 0 W
I-
cy
VI m
m
. d
I I d
VI cy m 0
03
00 VI cy 7-4 .
W
rl
0
VI
cy
VI . *
cy 0
0
d
d
m
OI m . .
0
I- 0
a
0
rl
VI W L
m VI
I- VI
I- m
cy l-
rl W
m
m W
cy .
. VI l-
m
d
00 . m m m
d
W .
- d 00 cy
cy
m
VI d
W
0
(Y
W
rl
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
0
m m rl . rl m
m
0
m m
m m
4
rl .
. r(
rl
m
A
rl u
Q
) :
n
rl m m rl . rl m
m
m m
00 m
m rl (Y
m m rl . 4 A
rl 1
b
rl
. . rl
rl
m
s. u
Q
) n
x W
u Q
) n
A,' u
Q
) :
n
00
10
0
00
10
0
..
I.
. 0
01
0
0
00
10
0
00
10
0
..I . . O
rlld
m
mmld m
(Ycy I VI
I I I I I
00
01
0
0
00
01
0
0
0
0
00
01
0 0
00
01
0 0
...I . .
mp
o I
O
W
l-l-m
Id
4
0
l-
rl
Im
(Y
I I
d
I I I
. ..I .
04
0
00
10
0
8m
.
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
VI 0
. 0 VI m
. 0 l- m
. .
m 0
0
(Y
..
It
rl m m 4 . d rl
(Y
m m (Y
00
m 00
m m
rl
rl
. .
m
d
rl
rl
m 00 m rl . rl rl 2 . m
rl
rlr
l
A
8 a z rl
;
2
0
A :
H
n
A
m d a
a t c W
CI
Li 4
c m a
c 0
m x 4 x m 4
B L ri a
ern -.
ca
bl -.(a
4
840
CY
il d
%
rl
EO
d
dX
!e
rn d
.. m 00 2
m 00 2 cy 0 .
(Y
m m cy 0
m 03 cy
00 m
03 .
. m
d
. rl 0
cy rl
0
0
i nE
cy 0
i n 3
PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT DATE AMOUNT EXPIRATION DATE EXPENDED REMAINING
BOU.Ol.A.87 Hemenway Wash Oct. 8, 1987 205,000.00 July 1, 1988 2,316,596.83 2,172,403.17 Sept. 13, 1990 70,000.00 Mar. 14, 1991 4,064,000.00 July 9, 1992 150,000.00
CITY OF HENDERSON: HEN.Ol.A.87 Pittman Wash Channel Au . 13, 1987 522,000.00 March 31, 1992 496,717.93 440,282.07
Fe%. 14, 1991 315,000.00 Feb. 13, 1992 100,000.00 --------------- TOT= 937,000.00
HEN.Ol.C.90 Pittman Wash Channel Sept. 13, 1990 3,000,000.00 Jan. 31, 1992 2,517,006.00 482,994.00
HEN.03.A.91 UPRR Channel Sept. 12, 1991 150,000.00 July 1, 1992 106,301.81 43,698.19
HEN.04.A.91 C-1 Channel SyStetll Sept. 12, 1991 600,000.00 July 1, 1992 209,966.35 390,033.65
HEN.OS.A.92 Sunset Det Basin July 9, 1992 1,385,000.00
CITY OF LAS VEGAS:
Collection & Outfall 0.00 1,385,000.00
LAS.Ol.A.87 Angel Park Detention July 9 1987 2,700.00 Jan. 1, 1991 391,546.41 8,753.59 Basin Structure Jan. 15, 1989 147,300.00
July 13, 1989 250,300.00 --------------- TOTAL 400,300.00
LAS .02.A.87 Buffalo Channel July 9 1987 94,200.00 Jan. 1, 1991 4,040,581.27 495,383.73 (aka Angel ParkjGowan Jan. 15, 1989 1,672,700.00
Dec. 14, 1989 3,019,365.00
TOTAL 4,535,965.00
Detentlon Basin) July 13, 1989 (250,300.00) ---------------
LAS.02.B.91 Buffalo Channel Sept. 12, 1991 110,000.00 Jan. 31, 1994 10,720.80 119,279.20
.
PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL F W D CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT NUMBER
INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT PROJECT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT
NAME DATE AMOUNT EXPIRATION DATE EXPENDED REMAINING
(aka Angel Park/Gowan April 09, 1992 20,000.00 Detentron Basin) Summerlin to Vegas Dr. 130,000.00
--------------- LAS.02.C.91 Buffalo Channel Oct. 10, 1991 588,898.00 Dec. 31, 1993
(aka Angel Park/Gowan
Westcliff to Summerlin Detentron Basin)
LAS.02.D.92 Buffalo Channel Design July 9, 1992 93,000.00 Doe - Westcliff
789.25 588,108.75
0.00 93,000.00
LAS.03.B.89 Gowan Detention Basine & Outfall
Nov. 9, 1989 650,000.00 June 30, 1993 Sept. 13, 1990
1,996,941.93 3,404,058.07 75,000.00
June 13, 1991 5,700,000.00 57,625.00
April 04, 1992 ( 1,107,625.00) Nov. 14 1991 No Net Change
July 9, 1992 26,000.00
Oct. 10, 1991
TOTAL 5,401,000.00
Jufy 9, is92 Se t. 12 1991 32,000.00
50,000.00
TOTAL 562,000.00
--------------- LAS 04.8.90 Oakey Blvd. System April 12, 1990 480,000.00 Jan. 30, 1992
--------------- 513,406.55 48,593.45
LAS.04.C.91 Oakey Blvd. system Oct. 10, 1991 35,000.00 Dec. 31, 1992 35,000.00 Decatur Crossing
, CLOSED
LAS.OB.A.89 Care AvenuelLake Sept. 14, 1989 1,980,000.00 Dec. 31, 1993 5,646,636.81 1,103,363.19 Mea8 Detentxon April 12 1990 570,000.00 and Conveyance May 9, 1491 4,200,000.00 System - Se3t. 12, 1991 no- net- change
TOTAL 6,750,000.00 ---------------
LAS.OS.A.89 Washington Avenue System 0 2
Se t. 14, 1989 . 10, 1991 600,000.00 Dec. 31, 1992 (58,000.00)
312,250.70 229,749.30 . -
TOTAL 542,000.00 ---------------
LAS.09.B.91 Washington Avenue System Sandhill to Bruce
Oct. 10, 1991 471,000.00 Jan. 1, 1994 58,120.81 412,879.19
LAS.09.D.92 Washington Ave July 9, 1992 2,437,000.00 0.00 2,437,000.00
23 i I
PROJECT EXPENSE SUMMARY FUND 443 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
LAS.lO.A.91 Gowan North Channel sept. 12, 1991 100,000.00 Jan. 31, 1992 73,866.28 26,133.72
LAS.ll.A.92 An el Park-Peccole 1 July 9, 1992 65,000.00
CITY OF MESQUITE:
gampart Storm Drain 0.00 65,000.00
MES.Ol.B.89 Town Wash Detention July 13, 1989 480,000.00 Dec. 1, 1991 623,660.13 36,339.87 Basin Mar. 14, 1991 180,000.00 Dec. 1, 1991 ---------------
TOTAL 660,000.00
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS: NLV.Ol.B.87 L.V. Wash/Craig to Au 3, 1987 1,000,000.00 July 31, 1993 2,304,931.76 75,668.24
Civic Center Jus,
14, 1988 no net chan e (aka King Charles Sep . 14, 1989 500, ooo. a. Diversion Channel) June 14, 1990 880,600.00
TOTAL 2,380,600.00 ---------------
NLV.03.A.88 Weet Range Waeh Apr. 14, 1988 360,000.00 May 1, 1991 307,984.25 52,015.75
NLv.03.C.91 West Range Wash June 13, 1991 350,000.00 July 1, 1992 183,962.20 166,037.80 Detention Basin
Diversion Dike
NLV.04.A.89 Gowan Detention May 11, 1989 480,000.00 July 1, 1994 11,920,677.83 1,499,322.17 Basins Outfall Nov 8. 1990 15,986,000.00 Structure Mar. i4, 1991 (3;046;000.00)
TOTAL 13,420,000.00 ---------------
NLV.05.A.89 U per LV Wash getention Basin
Sept. 14, 1989 650,000.00 Dec.. 31, 1991 1,595,142.36 54,857.64 Mar. 14, 1991 1,000,000.00
TOTALS
FILE:FINRPTS\FUND443\PE_SUM
53,640,935.05 24,201,227.95 'DSI=t~tPSltP~ttttPII=r=II'=I
2 4
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0
m
m 02
m
r- m
. 000
000
om
0
or-0
o
rlo
0-0
0r
lm
rl ... ...
00
0
000
000
...
000
000
000
...
000
000
om0
OF
0
04
0
Od
O
04m
4 ... ...
rlmm
cycucu
0 0
m m
QD
m
r- m
. *( H
5 8 s Gl u
0 0
0
0
0
QD a3 m . 0 0
0
0 0
a0 QD m . 0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0
0
QD QD m . cy
m
0 0
0 0
0
QD
QD VI . v1
L 3
0 0
0
03 00
0
VI . . 0
0
0
QD
QD
0
VI . 0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0
0
03 Q
D
0
m . d
m 0
0
0
a)
QD
0
m . 2 t 3 X
2 P
0 0
0
b
rl
m
v)
d . 0 0 0
0 0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
r- 4
m
VI d . . v
)
I3 P z X
W
0
VI
rl cy 0
bo
* . 0 0 0 . 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
VI rl
(Y 0
rD
d . W
3
E c
0
0
0 0
QD
VI a . . 0
0
0
0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0
0 . 0
0
0
0
QD
a3 . VI *(
u E I3 3 s 3
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I
- -
--
-
WORK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM FY 91-92
REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 443 Page 2 of 2
AS OF 08/14/92
ENTITY ILA P.O. P.O. CURRENT TOTAL P.O. ILA
AMOUNT EXPENDITURE AMOUNT NUMBER EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE CLARK COUNTY 525,000.00 30742 75,000.00 10,682.52 10,682.52 64,317.48 488,887.28
30007 14,431.40 0.00 30008 9,450.00 0.00 8,505.00 9625:::)
14,434.30
32242 6,000.00 0.00 0.00 6,000.00 32258 32241
3,102.00 0.00 0.00 3,102.00 2,500.00 2,490.90 2,490.90
22919 314,582.64 0.00 0.00 314,582.64 9.10
425,066.04
LAS VEGAS 320,000.00 ' 28880 320,000.00 0.00 25,062.32 294,937.68 294,937.68
NORTH LAS VEGAS 54,985.00 28144 54,985.00 0.00 47,572.00 7,413.00 7,413.00
HENDERSON
MESQUITE
293,363.00 24 100,000.00 0.00 25 26
126,440.00 0.00 0.00 126,440.00 7,000.00
27 16,000.00 0.00 6,992.65 7.35
28 20,000.00 0.00 0.00 16,000.00 0.00 16,615.00 3,385.00
269,440.00
0.00 100,000.00 269,755.35
-------------- 49,430.20 29348 49,430.20 32,792.19 49,430.20 (0.00) (0.00)
TOTAL MWP 1,332,778.20 1,903,427.28 45,965.61 207,899.34 1,001,021.90 1,124,878.86 ==s===========
TOTAL EXPENDITURES THIS PERIOD
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND443\WMPFDBAL
26
REGIOWAL FLOW CONTROL DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NPAY AS YOU W FUWDS (FUND 443) AS OF NWST 1992
VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-YAY (DET. SITE E) VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL SPENCER-ROCHELLE-TUAIN & UPSTREAM FLAMINGO UASH BRIDGE AT EASTERN AVENUE FLAMINGO UASH BRIDGE AT ARVILLE FLAMINGO UASH BRIDGES AT PARADISE AND PALOS VERDE DUCK CREEK BRIDGES AT TOlIYASU L LA CASITA RANGE UASH DETENTIW BASIN FACILITIES
OUTLYING AREAS: LAUGHLIN - WNAHED UASH LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS LAUGHLIN - HIKO SPRINGS REMAP BUNKERVILLE CHANNEL(AKA UINDMILL UASH) W A VALLEY - MRDY RIVER YEST LEVEE CKMPA VALLEY - LOGAN UASH (AKA BENSW UASH) HOAPA VALLEY - LOGAN UASH CHANNEL GOODSPRINGS FLOOD CWTROL IMPROVEMENTS NELSON FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS SEARCHLIGHT FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF HENDERSON: PITTMAN UASH CHANNEL (PHASE 111) PITTMAN UASH CHANNEL (CONSTRUCTIOW-PHASE I ) GREEN VALLEY PARKYAY BRIDGE UPRR CHANNEL C-1 CHANNEL SYSTEM SUNSET DETENTIW BASIN/COLLECTION SYSTEM L OUTFALL
CITY OF LAS VEGAS:
ANGEL PARK DETENTION BASIN STRUCTURE (CLW-1) ANGEL PARWGOUAN CONVEYANCE (AKA BUFF CHNL CLW-2) ANGEL PK/CQYAW DE1 BSN(BUF CHL)WERLIN-VEGAS DR ANGEL PK/GOUAN D E I BSN(BUF CHL)UESTCLIFF-B))IERLIN BUFFALO CHANNEL DESIGN ( WE-VESTCLIFF )
GWAN OUTFALL AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OAKEY BLVD DETENTIW & CONVEYANCE SYSTEM OAKEY BLVD DETENTIW L CONVEYANCE (DECATUR X-ING) CAREY AVENUE/LAKE MEAD DE1 L CONVEYANCE SYSTEM
27
. -. . . - - r
CLA.03.C.W 3,575,000 CU.0S.D.91 85D,OOO CLA.M.A.89 61,900 CLA.ob.B.89 294,819 CU.04.C.W 1,702,000 CLA.OS.A.91 145,000 CLA.06.A.91 480 , 000
20,026,719
1----------1--
LN.01 A 8 9 350,000 LAU.OZ.A.89 370 , 000 UU.OZ.B.92 9,500 BUN.01 A 9 0 541,000 IKu.Ol.B.89 200 , 000 CKM.02.A.89 340,000 mM.02.8.92 4,216,000 GSP.01 A.88 99,000 NEL.Ol.A.86 m,ooo SEA.Dl.A.88 ' 172,000
-1---1-1------
6,367,500
HEN.01 A.87 937,000 HEN.01.C.90 3,000,600 HEN.02.A.89 1,128,514 HEN.03.A.91 150,000 HEN.04.A.91 600,000 HEN.OS.A.92 1,385,000 -.---..----.I-
LAS.Ol.A.87 US.OZ.A.87 LAS.OZ.B.91 LAS.02.C.91 LAS.OZ.D.92 LAS.03.B.89 LAS.04.B.W LAS.04.C.91 LAS.08.A.89
7,200,514
400,300 4,535,965
130,000 588,698 93,000
5,401,000 562 , 000 35 , 000
6,750,000
REGIONAL FLOW CONTROL DISTRICT CAPITAL IIIPROVEMNT PROJECTS *PAY AS YOU GO" FWDS (FWD 443) AS OF A W S T 1992
PROJECT NAME CURRENT ILA SUPPLEMENTS
PROJECT I VALUE OR NEU ILA'S
UASHINGTON AVE CWVEYANCE SYSTEM (CLW-9) UASHINGTON A M SYSTEM - SANDHILL TO BRUCE UASHINGTON AVE SYSTEM - CONSTRUCTION W A N NORTH CHANNEL ANGEL PARK-PECCOLE 1 (RAMPART STORM DESIGN) ALTA STORM DRAIN CHEYENNE CHANNEL - BUFFALO OR TO GOYAW S. OET BASIN
CITY OF MESQUITE: T O W UASH DETENTION BASIN (DSG)
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS:
L V UASH CRAIG-CIVIC CENTER(AKA KING CHARLES DIV) EAST RANGE UASH OETENTIW BASIN VEST RANGE UASH DIVERSION DIKE W A N DETENTION BASINS OUTFALL (STIMSOW EXTENSION) UPPER LAS VEGAS UASH DETENTION BASIN (DSNO & ROU) KYLE CANYW DETENTION BASIN U TRIBUTARY TO LAS VEGAS UASH 0 W I N O AL NORTE
BOULDER CITY: HEMENUAY UASH GEORGIA AVENUE CHANNEL
LAS.W.A.89 LAS.09.B.91 LAS.09.D.92 LAS.lO.A.91 LAS.ll.A.92 LAS.12.A.92 LAS.13.A.92 - -
542,000 471 ,OOO
2 , 43?, 000 100,000 65 , 000
954,800 67,000
23,132,965
1-.-..------
NLV.Ol.B.87 NLV.03.A.88 NLV.03.C.91 NLV.W.A.89 NLV.05.A.89 NLV.06.A.91 ILV.PEND1NG .-
2,360,600 360,000 350,000
13,420,000 1,650,000
450,000 250,000
..-I------.-
18,610,600
FILE: FINRPTS\FWDC43\PROJECT
28
FUND 444 - FUND BALANCE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AUGUST 1992
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE
REVENUES : 3550 - INTEREST EARNED 9999 - INTEREST (TREASURER'S ADJUSTMENT)
EXPENSES : EXPENSES IN MARCH
ENDING FUND BALANCE (FUND 444)
CURRENT OBLIGATIONS AGAINST BOND FUNDS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BALANCE REMAINING ON PROJECT FUNDED TO DATE
UNOBLIGATED BOND FUNDS
CURRENT FUNDING REQUESTS
74,354,130
29
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 444 MONTH ENDING AUGUST 1992
PROCESS DATE VENDOR NAME
P.O. PROJECT INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND444\MNTHEXPS
08.12.92 08.12.92 08.04.92 08.04.92 08.21.92 08.04.92 08.04.92 08.21.92 08.04.92 08.04.92 08.12.92 08.04.92 08.21.92
CITY OF BOULDER CITY COE & VAN LOO COE & VAN LOO COE & VAN LOO KLEINFELDER MEADOW VALLEY CONTRACTORS CITY OF HENDERSON FREHNER CONSTRUCTION CITY OF HENDERSON CITY OF LAS VEGAS CH2M HILL CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
30695 28873 28872 28872
2 31052 30082 28879
3 29351 28870 30741 31267
BOUOlA87 BOU01A87 BOU01A87 BOUOlA87 CLAO2F92 CLA02F92 HENOlD9 1 HENOlD91 HEN03892 LAso9c91 MES01B89 NLV05B92 NLV05B92
6056 08.10.92 118 07.22.92 81 07.15.92
39361 07.15.92 315088 08.04.92
3 07.17.92 013582 07.14.92
8 07.31.92 013581 07.14.92 8115 07.22.92
207735 07.17.92 AR2200 07.29.92
3 08.10.92
56,000.56 12,962.22 3,455.10 12,967.74 16,928.00
275,348.25 6,964.13
144,893.05 283.58
268,867.00 33,501.44 30,125.97 729,751.33
1,592,048.37 ------------- PsIsPIIII'===
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE FOR AUGUST 1992 REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 444
PROCESS VENDOR DATE NAME
P.O. PROJECT #/ INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE NUMBER EXP CLASS NUMBER DATE AMOUNT
_ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ 08.24.92 PROGRESSIVE CONTRACTING 29034 KES01B89
FILE: FINRPTS\FUND444\ACCPAY
8 08.18.92 296,001.67
296,001.67 ------------ PtPIPPtltPP=
31
PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT FUND 444 CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT NAME
INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT
GRAND DATE AMOUNT EXPENDED REMAINING
TOTAL EXPIRATION
AMOUNT
CLA.02.F.92 RAWHIDE CHANNEL McLEOD TO MTN V 4 STA 07.09.92
02.13.92 1,391,000 03.31.93 594 , 485 510,563 1,474,922
CLA.03.E.92 VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM 06.11.92 (ROCHELLE-MCCLOUD)
921,800 07.01.93 0 921,800
CLA.03.F.92 VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL 07.09.92 (PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS)
1,627,000 07.01.93
CLA.03.G.92 VAN BUSKIRK CHANNEL 09.10.92 (PHASE IV IMPROVEMENTS)
1 , 072 , 000
BOULDER CITY:
0 1,627,000
0 1,072,000
Hemenway Wash 11.14.91 Hemenway Wash 02.13.92
1,327,000 12.01.92 (460,000)
I BOU.Ol.A.87 BOU.Ol.A.87
I
HENDERSON :
HEN.Ol.D.91
HEN.03.B.92
LAS VEGAS:
LAS.03.C.91
754,385 112,615
Pittman Wash Chnl 11.14.91 UPRR Channel 03.12.92 Phase 11 2,520,000 07.31.92
2,600,000 01.31.93 1,944,719 575 , 281
465 2 , 599,535
Gowan Detention 11.14.91 Basin
10,900,000 03.31.94 (3,400,000)
25,452 10,874,548
LAS.04.D.92 Oakey Blvd Detention 05.09.92
Washington Ave. 11.14.91
Basm
System - Sandhill Outfall
9,519,200 11.01.94 0 9,519,200
796,199 903,801 LAS.09.C.91 1,700,000 07.01.94
32
PROJECT EXPENSE/INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BALANCE REPORT CLARK COUNTY REGIONAL FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FUND 444
MES.Ol.B.89 Town Wash 11.14.91 5,448,304 07.01.93 2 , 804 , 080 1,333,424 04.09.92 Detention Basin (1,310,800)
NORTH LAS VEGAS:
NLV.OS.B.92 U y r La6 Vegae Wash 01.09.92 12,900,000 07.30.93 952 , 132 7,997,868 De ention Basin (3,950,000)
33
BOND PROJECTS AS OF 18-S.p-92 FUND 444 OBLIGATIONS
DATE CURRENT PROJECT NAME PROJECT # ORIG FUND OBLIGATED FWD RFCD FWD I NG
ALLOCATION NWOS M W C E APPVD REWESTS _._._---_-- 1____1___------.---------.----.--------..-------..------..-----...-----------..--.---------.---
CLARK COUNTY EAST RANGE UASH DETENTION BASIN CLA.W.A.91 8,620,000 8,620,000 RAUHIDE CHANL/McLEQ) TO MTN VISTA CLA.OZ.F.92 2,820,000 1,391,000 02/13/92 RAUHIDE CHANL/McLEOD TO HTN VISTA CLA.OZ.F.92 594,465 834,515 07/09/92 VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM IMPROHIENTS CLA.03.D.91 7,078,200 7,078,200 VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM CLA.03.E.92 921,800 921,800 0 06/11/92
CLA.03.F.92 0 1,627,000 (1,627,000) 07/09/92 VAN BUSKIRK SYSTEM CLA.03.6.92 1,072,OOO (1,072,000) 09/10/92
CLARK COUNTY OUTLYING AREAS UNNAMED UASH - LAUGHLIN UU.Ol.B.92 4,100,000 4,100,000 0 03/12/92
C I T Y OF LAS VEGAS BUFFALO CHANNEL (SWNERLIN PKW) LAS.OZ.B.91 1,500,000 1,500,000
LAS.OZ.E.92 2,245,500 (2,245,500) 08/13/92 GOVAN DETENTION BASINS .LAS.03.C.91 10,240,000 10,900,000 (660,000) 11/14/91
LAS.03.C.91 (3,400,000) 2,740,000 08.13.92 OAKEY BLVD. DETENTIW BASIN LAS.W.D.92 7,970,000 9,519,200 (1,549,200) 05/09/92 UASHINTON AVE/SANDHILL OUTFALL LAS.oP.C.91 1,700,000 1,700,000 0 11/14/91
C I T Y OF HENDERSON C - 1 CHANNEL SYSTEM HEN.W.A.91 6,000,000 6,000,000 PITTWAN UASH CHANNEL -PHASE 2 HEN.01.D.91 3,470,000 2,520,000 950,000 11/14/91 PITTHAN UASH CHANNEL -PHASE 3 HEN.Ol.A.87 3,162,200 3,162,200 UPRR CHANNEL HEN.03.B.92 2,300,000 2,600,000 (300,000) 03/12/92
C I T Y OF BOULDER C I T Y HEMENUAY UASH BOU.01 A 8 7 0 1,327,000 11/14/91
(460,000) (867,000) 02/13/92
C I T Y OF MESQUITE TOUN UASH DETENT1 W BASIN HES.01.B.89 5,448,304 5,U8,304 0 11/14/91
(1,310,800) 1,310,800 04/09/92
F I LE : F I NRPTS\FUND466\BO)(DPROJ
34
.. - . - 7 - - T -
I
FUNDING REQUESTS AND PRIORITIES REPORT (FY 92/93)
35
36
FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 9/14/92 fik:m:\.xd\fy02-03.xh
Program
I Amount Funding
UPRR Chennel
Design funded Pittman Wesh (Duck Creek - Stephenie St)
funded [channel under constructionlcomplete basin predesignl
Design fundedlchannel const. Pittman Wash (Sunset - UPRR) 81 Pittmen Park Det. Besin
conet. on Bond List [complete designlconstruction to begin]
Design part fundedlpart of Mission Hills Dot. Basin EL Collection System (incl. ROW)
Ipredesign 6. ROW acquisition of besinl
80 81,385,000 $1,385,000 Sunset Dot. Basin, Collection Sys. 8I Outfall (incl. ROW)
List [complete design/construction to beginl
Design fundedlconst. on Bond Lower C-1 Channel (Leke Mead Dr. - Drake St.)
[under construction]
Funded
Confluence Detention Basin (incl. ROW)
on Bond List [complete designlbegin constructionl
Design fundedlconstruction
Funded Upper Les Veges Wesh Interception BermlChannel lundar constructionl I I I I Upper Las Veges Wash Detention Besin
[under constructionl
Funded
$800,000 $800,000 Sloan Channel (Las Veges Wesh - Confluence Dot. Basin)
81,200.oO0 on Bond List $1,200,000 [begin constructionl
Design fundedlpert of const. West Renge Wesh Diversion Dike
[construct modificetions]
$30,000 $30,000 North Las Vegas Detention Basin (outlet modifications)
~~ ~
Kyle Canyon Detention Basin (incl. ROW)
[complete designlROW acquisition]
Design funded
$0 $250,000 $250,000 participation for Camino AI Norte crossing)
A Channel (LV Blvd - Camino AI Norte) (Developer
80 $60,000 $60,000 constructionl
Les Veges Wesh (Craig to Civic) ,[complete
0 100,000 0 100,000
37
FY 92/93 PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 9/14/92 fik:rn:\.x&fyS2-SJ.xk
Program
I I Funding Amount
Van Buskirk Outfall (flamingo Wash - flamingo Rd) Funded
[under constructionl
Van Buskirk Channel Upgrades Detention Basin C Design fundedlconst. on
,[complete designbegin constructionl Bond List
Van Buskirk - Twain, McLeod, Viking, & Tompkins Systems Deaign funded/const. on
[complete designbegin constructionl Bond List $1 ,000,000 8200,000 $800,000
Tropicana Detention Basin (incl. ROW) $Mx),OOo $500,000
[predesign/ROW acquisition]
Van Buskirk Detention Basin (ROW acq.) Funded
[complete ROW acquisition]
Rawhide Channel (remaining system) Design 81 part const. funded/
[complete design/constructionl remaining const. on Bond List
Flamingo Wash (Tropicana Wash to Decatur Blvd) Part of const. on June 1992 List
[complete designlconst. Winnick improvements] 81,500,000 8 1,500,000
Duck Creek (Mountain Vista to UPRR) Design fundedlconst. on June
Logan Wash Diversion Design funded
[constuct diversion] $800,000 6800,000
Goodsprings - Phase 1 Improvements Design funded
[begin constructionl 8303.000 8303,000
Searchlight - Eastern portion improvements Design funded
[begin constructionl $346,000 8346,000
Bunkerville Design funded
[complete design1
West Levee - Muddy River Design funded
I Hemenway Valley Wash Improvements 80 I $160.000
BOND PROJECT LIST - FUNDING REQUEST SUMMARY THROUGH 9/14/92
file:GWF:m:\excel\sum bd.xls TOTAL OF FUNDING PROGRAM
HYDROGRAPHIC BASIN BOND REQUESTS AMOUNT PROJECTS DIFFERENCE
SOUTHWEST LAS VEGAS VALLEY Rawhide Channel . $2,820,000 $1,985,485 $834,515 Van Buskirk System $8,000,000 $3,620,800 $4,379,200
IHENDERSON I Pittman Wash Channel (Phase Ill Pittman Wash Channel (Phase Ill)
$950,000 $2,520,000 $3,470,000
$6,000,000 $6,000,000 Black Mtn Dam/C-1 Channel System ($300,000) $2,600,000 $2,300,000 UPRR Channel
$3,162,200 $3,162,200
TOTAL - HENDERSON $9,812,200 $5,120,000 $14,932,200
MESQUITE Town Wash Detention Basin $5,448,304 $4,137,504 $1,310,800
TOTAL - MESQUITE 55,448,304 $4,137,504 $1,310,800
(no projects) $0 ($1,327,000) $1,327,000 Hemenway Wash - 4th Suppl.
$0
$460,000 ($460,000) Hemenwav Wash - 5th Suppl. TOTAL - BOULDER CITY $0 ($867,000) $867,000
:.: i. .............................. .~. ................................................................................... . ~ ~ . ......................... .~. ........................ .:. ......................................
82,130,504 $49,745,489 $32,385,015 Y
Bond Fund $80,000,000