Nurses Research Findings: Missed
OpportunitiesJane Campion RGN MHSc Primary Care
HealthCare Minds Ltd
22nd October 2012
Share knowledge Share skills Share experiences Change clinical practice Improve user outcomes Increase visibility of Nursing profession Increase credibility of Nursing profession
Why is it important for Nurses to publish their Research?
“I never want to see it again” “To be honest I’m afraid someone will turn
around and say that’s all rubbish” “I meant to, but never got around to it” “I didn’t find my supervisor very supportive
when I was doing the research, and now I really don’t know how to go about it (publishing)….I don’t want to ask them to co-author”
Colleagues’ Personal Experiences
Exhaustion Daunting task Lack of writing skills Self confidence Poor incentives Unfavourable feedback Lack of finance
Ref: Heyman B, Cronin P (2005) , Happell, B. (2005).
Barriers to Publishing
Lack of Understanding of How to Write for Publication
Writer’s Block Lack of Time Fear of Rejection
Ref: Oermann MH, C. Hays JC. (2011). Carlson, Masters, & Pfadt, 2008, Shah, Shah, & Pietrobon, 2009, McGaghie &
Webster, 2009
Barriers to Publishing
Practice Nurses (PN) provide much of the care for patients with chronic diseases
Key findings of one unpublished Irish study showed: PN have vital role to play in chronic disease
management in General Practice and Practices with a PN are more likely to have
improvements in chronic disease management and practice targets at an advanced or optimum level.
Ref: Taylor SJC 2005, Robinson C. 2007
Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care
Self management with support enhances outcomes in Diabetes programmes
Self-management education teaches problem-solving skills and results in enhanced self-efficacy as well as facilitating optimum QOL
Practice Nurses are effective at providing self-management support
Research shows a need for specific education to equip the nurses with these skills.
Ref WHO (2005), Wagner EH (2001), Greaves CJ (2007), Page T(2005) , Oakeshott P (2003)
Diabetes Programmes
Publishing quality improvement projects Less rigour but valuable information Less frequently published
Lack of time Lack of writing skills Poor recognition of their importance Lack of confidence Don’t fit author guidelines
Ref: Moss F, Thompson R (1999), Smith R (2000), Cleary M, Walter G (2004)
Publishing is Not Just for the Academic Researcher
There are five main reasons to write for
publication......
Ref: Oermann MH, C. Hays JC. (2011)
Why Bother?
1. Share Ideas
and Expertise
McGaghie and Webster (2009)
2. Disseminate
Evidence and
Research Findings
Ref: Carlson, Masters, and Pfadt (2008)
Ref: McGaghie and Webster (2009)
3. Meet Promotion, Tenure,
and Other Job Requirements
4. Expand Personal
Knowledge and Skills
Ref: Winslow, Mullaly, and Blankenship (2008)
5. Gain
Personal Satisfaction
Nursing Research Facilitators www.inspirenet.ca Writing groups - Rickard et al. (2009) Mentoring - Winslow, Mullaly, & Blankenship (2008)
Incentivise publication through CPD credits Encourage central research database use Blogging & promoting research through social
mediaExample:http://
www.phd2published.com/tag/future-of-academic-publishing/
Food for Thought
Dissemination Planning Tools
http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/advances/planningtool.htm
Carpenter D, Nieva V, Albaghal T, et al. 2005
Albert, T. (2009). Winning the Publication Game: How to write a scientific paper without neglecting your patients. 3rd ed. Oxford, Radcliffe Publishing.
Happell, B. (2005). "Disseminating nursing knowledge--a guide to writing for publication." Int J Psychiatr Nurs Res 10(3): 1147-55.
Clark, A. M. and D. R. Thompson (2012). "Making good choices about publishing in the journal jungle." Journal of Advanced Nursing 68(11): 2373-2375.
Winslow, S. A., Mullaly, L. M., & Blankenship, J. S. (2008). You should publish that: Helping staff nurses get published. Nursing for Women’s Health, 12, 120–126
Useful Resources
Create a culture of writing and others will benefit from shared knowledge
through enhanced practice and improved patient outcomes.
Nurses have the power to influence
Conclusion
• Bird D, Morris T. (2006) Using community matrons to target long-term conditions. Nursing times.;102(23):19-20.
• Carlson, D. S., Masters, C., & Pfadt, E. (2008). Guiding the clinical nurse through research publication development. Journal of Nurses in Staff Development, 24, 222–225.
• Carpenter D, Nieva V, Albaghal T, et al. Development of a Planning Tool to Guide Research Dissemination. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, et al., editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Vol 4: Programs, Tools, and Products). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb. Available from URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK20603/
• Cleary M, Walter G (2004) Apportioning our time and energy: oral presentation, poster, journal article or other? International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 13, 3, 204-207.
• Gravelle H, Dusheiko M, Sheaff R, Sargent P, Boaden R, Pickard S, et al. (2007) Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data. BMJ;334(7583):31
• Greaves CJ, Campbell JL. (2007) Supporting self-care in general practice. British Journal of General Practice;57(543):814-21.
• Heyman B, Cronin P (2005) Writing for publication: adapting academic work into articles. British Journal of Nursing. 14, 7, 400-403.
• McGaghie, W. C., & Webster, A. (2009). Scholarship, publication, and career advancement in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 43. Medical Teacher, 31, 574–590
• Moss F, Thompson R (1999) A new structure for quality improvement reports. Quality in Health Care. 8, 2, 76.
• Murphy E. (2004) Case management and community matrons for long term conditions. British Medical Journal;329(7477):1251-52.
• Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Austin A, Cappuccio F. (2003) Is there a role for nurse-led blood pressure management in primary care? Fam. Pract.;20(4):469-73.
References
• Oermann MH, C. Hays JC. (2011). Writing for Publication in Nursing. 2nd ed. Springer Publishing Company, New York
• Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, et al. (1995) No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ;153(10):1423–31.
• Page T, Lockwood C, Conroy-Hiller T. (2005) Effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac clinics in adult patients with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease. JBI Reports;3:2-26.
• Rickard, C., McGrail, M., Jones, R., O’Meara, P., Robinson, A., Burley, M., et al. (2009). Supporting academic publication: Evaluation of a writing course combined with writers’ support group. Nurse Education Today, 29, 516–521.
• Robinson C. (2007) Chronic disease management in general practice: A cross sectional survey: Unpublished MastersThesis, Dept of General Practice NUI Galway.
• Sargent P, Pickard S, Sheaff R, Boaden R. (2007) Patient and carer perceptions of case management for long-term conditions. Health and Social Care in the Community;15(6):511-19
• Smith R (2000) Quality improvement reports: a new kind of article. They should allow authors to describe improvement projects so others can learn. British Medical Journal. 321, 7274, 1428.
• Taylor SJC, Candy B, Bryar RM, Ramsay J, Vrijhoef HJM, Esmond G, et al. (2005) Effectiveness of innovations in nurse led chronic disease management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review of evidence. BMJ;331(7515):485-.
• Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. (2001) Improving Chronic Illness Care: Translating Evidence Into Action. Health Aff;20(6):64-78.
• WHO. Preventing chronic disease: A vital investment (online). Geneva, 2005 (cited 2008 Nov 28) Available from:URL:http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/full_report.pdf.
• Winslow, S. A., Mullaly, L. M., & Blankenship, J. S. (2008). You should publish that: Helping staff nurses get published. Nursing for Women’s Health, 12, 120–126.
References continued
THE JOY OF WRITING—RECIPE FOR SUCCESSFUL PUBLICATION
One cup knowledge (no substitutions allowed)
One cup confidence Half cup diligence Two cups patience Half cup curiosity One quart creativity Four to six references to
taste One to two co-authors
(optional).
Ref: (Jean Blankenship)Winslow, S. A., L. M. Mullaly, et al. (2008)
Thoroughly mix knowledge with confidence and diligence until well-blended.
Extra diligence may be required. Sprinkle batter liberally with patience and pour entire quart of creativity over mixture. Adding curiosity will result in richer, more satisfying flavour.
Mix thoroughly until batter is smooth and no lumps remain. Gently fold dough into baking pan lined with references. Co-authors may be required for successful product.
Bake in prepared oven for 30 to 60 days. Remove from oven, cut and paste until desired shape is obtained and taste is satisfactory to all involved.
Multiple attempts may be required for desired results.
Serve with Pride!