OCIO/OCMIO Informatics Workforce Development ProjectPhase II Planning Discussion
February 3, 2012
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone2
Full Implementation of the Workforce Development Strategy is a Multi-year Process
Completed the role profile assessment in December 2011 – results to be shared during Informatics Workforce Development Project In Progress Review on 10 FEB
Focus is now shifting to Phase II – creation of the Learning & Development Program
October 2011 – September 2012 October 2012 – September 2013 October 2013 – September 2014
Phase III: Recruiting & Onboarding, Retention, and Success Planning Program Design & Implementation
Phase IV: Assessment Re-Boot, Workforce Development Strategy Refresh, Job Family Matrix Review, and Organizational Blueprints
Phase II: Role Profile Assessment and Rollout, Learning & Development/Career Development Program Design & Implementation
Phase I: Workforce Development Strategy
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone3
• Gain alignment around the project plan, key deliverables, etc.
• Identify the project governance structure
Key deliverables• Project plan• Governance structure and team• Project charter
Phase II Work Plan
• Create and deploy role profile assessments
• Conduct assessment within ERMC, NRMC, SRMC, and PRMC
• Create gap analysis report and identify implications to the L&D plan priorities
• Review the assessment results
Key deliverables• Role profile assessment results
report and list of L&D priorities
• Develop the detailed L&D plans for Strategic Leadership/CMIO job family
• Finalize the implementation strategy
• Rollout the L&D plans to the regions
• Collect feedback and revise, as necessary
Key deliverables• Detailed L&D plans for
Strategic Leadership job family • Detailed implementation
strategy
• Develop the detailed L&D plans for the remaining two job families
• Rollout the L&D plans to the regions
• Collect feedback and revise, as necessary
Key deliverables• Detailed L&D plans for
remaining job families• White papers, executive
summaries, and presentations for professional conferences, workshops and meetings
Project Planning
Oct 2011 Nov – Dec 2011 Jan – May 2012 June – Sept 2012
Role Profile AssessmentL&D Design & Rollout
Proof of ConceptL&D Design & Rollout
Remaining Job Families
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone4
Assessment Overview
As part of the Clinical Informatics Workforce Development Project, an online assessment was conducted to determine the organizational strengths and gaps in competencies and technical skills for individuals occupying key clinical informatics roles.
The output of the assessment will be used to create a targeted Clinical Informatics Workforce Development Strategy that leverages the identified strengths and closes the gaps.
Assessment Scope Assessments were created for the following roles:
Strategic Leadership Clinical Systems Trainer Clinical Workflow Analyst
Deputy CMIO (MTF)CMIO (MTF)Deputy CMIO (RMC)CMIO (RMC)
CST 1 (MTF)CST 2 (MTF)CST Supervisor (MTF)CST 2 (RMC)CST Supervisor (RMC)
CWA 2 (MTF)CWA Supervisor (MTF)CWA 2 (RMC)CWA Supervisor (RMC)
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone5
Assessment Overview
Assessment Scope continued In August 2011, a “pilot” assessment was launched within the Western Region and select
individuals across the AMEDD (e.g., other CMIOs, Regional lead positions) when additional data was needed
The assessment was later expanded to the remaining AMEDD employee population in December 2011
Employees completed self-assessments for their current role and, when applicable, managers also completed assessments for the employees that they oversee» Prior to completing the assessments, all participants were told that any data they provide would
be kept anonymous and confidential and only shared in an aggregate report
Assessment Participation The pilot assessment was launched on August 10, 2011 and closed on August 23, 2011 The second assessment was launched on December 7, 2011 and closed on December
16, 2011 For both of these assessments, we achieved an overall participation rate of 72%
The remaining slides of this document provide detailed assessment results for the Clinical Informatics workforce
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone6
Executive Summary of FindingsCompetencies
1. There are significant competency gaps across the informatics leadership roles, and these gaps are present in foundational, supervisory, and leadership competencies
2. For both the CWA and CST job families, the majority of the competency gaps were reported for the functional competencies for example, Powerpoint, Essentris, CHCS, sect. In fact, gaps in foundational competencies were only reported for the Supervisory roles (MTF and RMC). Gaps in Teamwork were reported for all Supervisory roles
3. There were no gaps reported in the supervisory competencies for the CWA or CST job families. It will be important to leverage the strengths in People Management and Talent Development as the Workforce Development Strategy is implemented
4. When reviewing the results for the CWA and CST job families by region, the findings are largely consistent with results for the entire workforce
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone7
Executive Summary of FindingsTechnical Skills
1. For all roles, there are more gaps in technical skills than in competencies. This is to be expected since technical skills often require formal training and on-the-job experience
2. Gaps in technical skills primarily center around the Clinical Systems across all roles, and gaps in ESSENTRIS, ICDB/Carepoint, and CHCS were reported most frequently
» Moreover, there are significantly more gaps reported in Clinical Systems within the Strategic Leadership job family.
3. There appears to be a consistent gap across all CST roles for MS Power Point and CWA roles for MS Excel. These results were surprising since both these tools are integral to the CST and CWA roles, respectively
4. When reviewing the results for the CWA and CST job families by region, the findings are largely consistent with results for the entire workforce
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone8
Strategic Leadership Assessment ResultsCompetencies
• There are significant competency gaps across the informatics leadership roles
• Gaps in the foundational competencies are relatively surprising given that these competencies are foundational to success in informatics in general, much less a requirement for a leadership position
Note: data points for the Deputy CMIO (MTF) role are limited, and therefore caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions based on the data.
Deputy CMIO (MTF) (n=2)
CMIO (MTF) (n=12)
Deputy CMIO (RMC) (n=4)
CMIO (RMC) (n=3)
(8 gaps) (7 gaps) (1 gaps) (8 gaps)
Communication (3 gaps)r y g y
Learning Agility (1 gap)r g g g
Results Orientation (3 gaps)r r g y
Teamwork (4 gaps)r r y r
People Management (3 gaps)r r g r
Talent Development (3 gaps)r r g r
Strategic Alignment/Mission Focus (1 gap)g g g r
Resource Management (3 gaps)r r g r
Change Management (3 gaps)r r g r
Foun
datio
nal
Supe
rviso
ryLe
ader
ship
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone9
Strategic Leadership Assessment ResultsTechnical Skills
• Gaps are reported in all technical skills, with the exception of MS Power Point and MS Word
• Gaps in Clinical Systems-related technical skills are surprising given the role that informatics leaders play in helping to shape the evolution and use of these systems
Note: data points for the Deputy CMIO (MTF) role are limited, and therefore caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions based on the data.
Deputy CMIO (MTF) (n=2)
CMIO (MTF) (n=12)
Deputy CMIO (RMC) (n=4)
CMIO (RMC) (n=3)
(6 gaps) (5 gaps) (6 gaps) (6 gaps)
MS Excel (2 gaps)g y g r
MS Power Point (0 gaps)g g g g
MS Word (0 gaps)g g g g
AHLTA (4 gaps)r y r r
CHCS (2 gaps)r g r g
ESSENTRIS (3 gaps)r g r r
ICDB/Carepoint (4 gaps)r r r r
MAPS Tools (4 gaps)r r r r
Function-specific
Clinical/business process analysis and reengineering (3 gaps)
r y g r
Clin
ical
Sys
tem
sM
S O
ffice
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone10
Strategic Leadership Assessment ResultsImplications for the Workforce Development Strategy
Competencies Gaps reported in the foundational competencies should be addressed immediately.
Going forward, the talent acquisition process will need to focus on selecting employees who demonstrate these competencies at the desired levels of proficiency.
The current gaps reported in the supervisory and leadership competencies will need to be addressed through a targeted Learning and Development plan. These competencies can take time to develop and are often developed through a combination of targeted training and on-the-job experiences. Going forward, it will be important to identify employees (either individual contributors or supervisors) who have the potential to fulfill a leadership role early in their careers and to ensure they are given opportunities to develop these competencies so they are prepared for the leadership role when the time comes.
Technical Skills Since the majority of the gaps were reported in the clinical systems, MAPS tools, or
clinical/business process analysis and reengineering, Learning and Development programs should focus on developing technical capability in these technical skills more so than in MS Office skills.
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone11
Next Steps: Learning & Development Program Design
For each of the competencies and technical skills captured in the role profiles, we will create a Learning and Development program comprised of 5 components (see below)
When designing the L&D program, we will ensure that we create… L&D actions that are highly specific and applicable to the MEDCOM and prioritized based on the
biggest gaps (as identified in the assessment) The necessary mix of development tools for each role/level Alignment with existing AMEDD Center & School and other training and development programs,
while leveraging existing training materials, when possible
Practice
Read
Study/learn
Mentoring
Coaching
Practical, applied, and mainly on-the-job steps an
individual can take to build a competency or technical skill
Readings and reference material that highlight best
practices and effective approaches
Self-study courses, classroom training (internal
or external to MEDCOM), certifications, etc.
Self-initiated relationship with a colleague who has
particular expertise/strength in a competency or technical
skill
MEDCOM-assigned/ sponsored external, professional coach
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone12
Learning & Development Program Design continued
A Learning & Development library will be created to house the “Practice,” “Read,” and “Study/Learn” Learning & Development Actions for every role, competency, and technical skill in one central location
Learning experiences are unique to each role (although they may apply to multiple roles) and are based on the competencies/technical skills listed in the role profiles
Employees and their supervisors will be able to filter the L&D library by role, competency/technical skill and type of learning experience to create a development plan that is specific to their role, development needs, and learning preferences
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone13
Learning & Development Program Governance Structure, Roles, and Responsibilities
LTC Angela Stone
Governance Council Members Voting/Non-Voting Chief Medical Information Officer, MEDCOM Voting Member/Chair5 Regional Chief Medical Information Officers Voting MemberInformatics Consultant to TSG (Medical Corps) Voting MemberInformatics Consultant to TSG (Nurse Corps) Voting MemberCorps Specific Branch Proponency Officer (MC, ANC, Civilian), Director, AMEDD Personnel Proponency Directorate, Director, Talent Management
Ad Hoc Membership as needed, with voting privileges at the discretion of the standing members on a decision by decision basis.
Ms. Michele McCormickMs. Kim Hermann-Do
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone14
CMIO Subgroup Lead – Proposed Next Steps
Work step Lead Target completion date
1. Identify 2 to 3 subgroup members to assist with the effort; consider individuals who: – Are fulfilling a CMIO role today – Have awareness and interest in the Workforce Development Project and talent
management, in general– Have knowledge of existing learning & development actions for CMIO roles
LTC Stone By 17 FEB
2. Identify existing learning & development actions for the CMIO competencies and technical skills listed in the role profiles– Focus on Practice, Read, Study/Learn actions– Axiom/TIAG to provide template for sub-team to document findings
LTC Stone & subgroup members
By 9 MARWill schedule two check-in calls with Axiom/TIAG to discuss progress, questions, etc.
3. Identify gaps in learning & development actions for the CMIO competencies and technical skills listed in the role profiles and ways to fill the gaps
Axiom/TIAG By 23 MAR
4. Develop recommended learning & development plan, including recommendations for which elements would be required
Axiom/TIAG & LTC Stone & subgroup members
By 6 APRNeed to schedule calls with LTC Stone and subgroup to work through this
Once work begins, we expect that the CMIO Subgroup will need to meet bi-weekly to achieve all of the objectives outlined above.
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone15
APPENDIX
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone16
Competency Model
Each assessment included the critical competencies identified for a particular role. Competencies comprised of the following four categories and varied by role/level:
Leadership
Supervisory
Functional
Foundational
Foundational competencies provide the basic building blocks or necessary requirements for performing the roles and should be demonstrated by all employees. Selection efforts should determine whether or not threshold levels have been achieved.
Functional competencies are the specialized knowledge, skills, and abilities required to achieve results in a particular role. Training and development programs can enhance functional competencies and provide high impact for the organization.
Supervisory competencies are required for success in supervisory or lead roles. These knowledge, skills, and abilities enable supervisors to effectively execute the strategy defined by OTSG leadership at the regional and MTF levels.
Leadership competencies define the knowledge, skills, and abilities that informatics leadership must have to drive the maturation of informatics and successfully execute the mission and vision throughout the AMEDD.
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone17
Clinical Systems Trainer Assessment ResultsCompetencies
• Competency gaps primarily exist at the Training Supervisor level
• The competency
gaps among the Supervisory roles primarily fall within the functional competencies, with the exception of Teamwork, which is a foundational competency
• Strengths in People Management and Talent Development will be critical to leverage as the Workforce Development Strategy is implemented
CST 1 (MTF) (n=44)
CST 2 (MTF) (n=69)
CST Supervisor (MTF) (n=6)
CST 2 (RMC) (n=7)
CST Supervisor (RMC) (n=5)
(0 gaps) (0 gaps) (3 gaps) (0 gaps) (4 gaps)
Communication (0 gaps)g g g g g
Learning Agility (0 gaps)g g g g g
Results Orientation (0 gaps)g g g g g
Teamwork (2 gaps)g g y g r
Adult Learning (2 gaps)g g r g r
Organizational Agility/Acumen (1 gap)g g g g r
Relationship Building (2 gaps)g g y g r
People Management (0 gaps)n/a n/a g n/a g
Talent Development (0 gaps)n/a n/a g n/a g
Func
tiona
lSu
perv
isory
Foun
datio
nal
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone18
Clinical Systems Trainer Assessment ResultsTechnical Skills
• There are more gaps in technical skills than in the competencies across all roles
• The presence of significant clinical systems gaps, especially in ESSENTRIS and CHCS, is surprising given that the primary purpose of the training role is to train end-users on the clinical systems
• Further, it is worth looking into the gaps related to MS Power Point, as this tool is integral to the training role
CST 1 (MTF) (n=44)
CST 2 (MTF) (n=69)
CST Supervisor (MTF) (n=6)
CST 2 (RMC) (n=7)
CST Supervisor (RMC) (n=5)
(3 gaps) (4 gaps) (4 gaps) (4 gaps) (6 gaps)
MS Excel (1 gap)g g g g r
MS Power Point (4 gaps)g y r r r
MS Project (1 gap)g g r g g
MS Word (0 gaps)g g g g g
MS OneNote (0 gaps)g g g g g
AHLTA (2 gaps)y g g g r
ESSENTRIS (5 gaps)r r r r r
CHCS (4 gaps)g r r r r
Dragon (0 gaps)g g g g g
Asutype (0 gaps)g g g g g
ICDB/Carepoint (4 gaps)y r g y r
Data flow between entities (0 gaps)g g g g g
Function-specific Database management (0 gaps)
g g g g g
MS
Offi
ceCl
inic
al S
yste
ms
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone19
Clinical Systems Trainer Assessment ResultsImplications for the Workforce Development Strategy
Competencies Targeted Learning and Development plans will need to be put in place for the Training
Supervisor roles to close the existing gaps. Based on the assessment results, it appears there is a capable cadre of trainers who
have demonstrated proficiency in the functional competencies. It will be important to identify those trainers who have the potential and desire to assume a leadership role and ensure they are given on-the-job opportunities and formal training to acquire the additional Supervisory competencies required to progress in the clinical systems trainer job family.» The role profiles will serve as a useful tool for both the development and selection of these
employees.
Technical Skills Because clinical systems knowledge is critical to a trainer’s ability to fulfill his/her role,
steps need to be taken to close these gaps. Going forward, the acquisition process should select for individuals with clinical systems
knowledge. Where this is not possible, the onboarding program should enable the individual to quickly establish their proficiency in these systems.
Gaps related to MS Office applications (especially Power Point) should be also addressed and can be done so through targeted training programs and mentorship from individuals who role model this technical skill.
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone20
Clinical Workflow Analyst Assessment ResultsCompetencies
• Competency gaps primarily center around the functional competencies and are most noticeable for the CWA Supervisor role at the MTF level
• Strengths in People Management and Talent Development will be critical to leverage as the Workforce Development Strategy is implemented
CWA 2 (MTF) (n=37)
CWA Supervisor (MTF) (n=4)
CWA 2 (RMC) (n=4)
CWA Supervisor (RMC) (n=4)
(0 gaps) (7 gaps) (3 gaps) (2 gaps)
Communication (1 gap)g y g g
Learning Agility (0 gaps)g g g g
Results Orientation (0 gaps)g g g g
Teamwork (2 gaps)g r g y
Analytical Thinking (2 gaps)g y r g
Change Management (2 gaps)g r r g
Integrated Thinking (1 gap)g y g g
Organizational Agility/Acumen (2 gaps)g r g y
Project Management (2 gaps)g r y g
People Management (0 gaps)n/a g n/a g
Talent Development (0 gaps)n/a g n/a g
Foun
datio
nal
Supe
rviso
ryFu
nctio
nal
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone21
Clinical Workflow Analyst Assessment ResultsTechnical Skills
• Gaps exist across all roles but are most concentrated in the CWA 2 (RMC) role
• Gaps in function-specific technical skills exist in individual contributor roles
• There appears to be pretty consistent gap across all roles for MS Excel; this is surprising given the importance of this tool for data analysis
• As was the case for the Trainer roles, there are fairly consistent gaps in ESSENTRIS across the roles
CWA 2 (MTF) (n=37)
CWA Supervisor (MTF) (n=4)
CWA 2 (RMC) (n=4)
CWA Supervisor (RMC) (n=4)
(6 gaps) (3 gaps) (10 gaps) (2 gaps)
MS Excel (4 gaps)r r r y
MS Power Point (0 gaps)g g g g
MS Project (2 gaps)g r r g
MS Word (1 gap)g g r g
MS OneNote (0 gaps)g g g g
AHLTA (0 gaps)g g g g
ESSENTRIS (3 gaps)r r r g
CHCS (1 gap)g g y g
Dragon (1 gap)y g g g
Asutype (0 gaps)g g g g
ICDB/Carepoint (2 gaps)y g y g
Data flow between entities (2 gaps)g g r r
Database management (1 gap)g g r g
Clinical/business data repositories and mining tools (2 gaps)
y g r g
Clinical/business process analysis and reengineering (2 gaps)
r g r gFunc
tion-
spec
ific
Clin
ical
Sys
tem
sM
S O
ffice
Informatics Workforce Development Project I Phase II Project Planning with LTC Stone22
Clinical Workflow Analyst Assessment ResultsImplications for the Workforce Development Strategy
Competencies Gaps in the foundational and functional competencies for CWA Supervisors at the MTF
need to be closed via targeted Learning and Development programs. Going forward, it will be important to identify employees who have demonstrated
proficiency in these competencies and who have the potential to fulfill a supervisory role early in their careers. Learning and Development programs will then need to be put in place to help these employees further develop these competencies and prepare for the supervisor roles.» The role profiles will serve as a useful tool for both the development and selection of these
employees
Technical Skills Because gaps were reported in MS Excel and ESSENTRIS for the majority of the CWA
roles, Learning & Development programs will need to be implemented to help all CWAs develop their capability in these technical skills at the proficiency level necessary for their roles.
Moreover, because a significant number of gaps were reported in various clinical systems and function-specific technical skills for the CWA 2 roles (MTF and RMC), Learning and Development programs will need to be implemented to help this CWA population develop their capabilities in these technical skills.