Perspectives in Scientific Communication: Publishing in Transition
Alexander GrossmannHTWK Leipzig &ScienceOpen
DPG Annual MeetingRegensburg, 7. März 2016
2
Too much information?
Over 2m new papers per year in STM only
3
Too much information?
…and about 4m submissions per year…
4
Scientific Publishing: Present Status
� Problems:
� too much information
� slow publication process & high rejection rates
� anonymous & non-transparent reviewing process
� no credits for reviewers
� expensive subscription pricing
� IF-driven „glamorous journals“ (R. Schekman)
� …
5
Scientific Publishing: Present Status?
R. Schekman:
The Guardian
Dec 9 (2013)
Is this the present status…?
6
Scientific Publishing: Present Status?
R. Schekman:
The Guardian
Dec 9 (2013)
…do we need a new culture of sharing?
7
New culture of sharing…
Sharing rather than
ownership:
the new normal for
the next generation.
Creative Commons
CC-BY licenses
supports sharing vs.
ownership model of
copyright.
Image Credit: Bike Sharing Shanghai, John Flickr CC-BY
8
New culture of sharing…
Social Networks
Communities
Crowd-sourcing
Open DataOpen Access
Repositories
Altmetrics
Open Peer Review
Science 2.0
Could we use this in science?
Perspectives in Scientific Publishing DPG Regensburg 2016
CC0 Pixabay
Alexander Grossmann
10
Publishing in transition...
1991 2000 2005 2008 2010 2012 2014
11
Publishing in transition...
� Ways to publish research today
� Directories (linking lists)
� Repositories or pre-print server
� OA journals (subject-based)
� Journal databases (‚mega journals‘)
� Aggregation networks
How about scientific communication?
12
Scientific Communication today…
Peer Review
Scientists
= Authors
= Readers
= Reviewers
?
?
?
?
How to set up such a novel workflow?
13
Scientific Communication today…
Peer Review
Scientists
= Authors
= Readers
= Reviewers
?
?
?
?
Scientific communication tomorrow…?
14
Scientific Communication tomorrow…?
arXiv
15
Scientific Communication tomorrow…?
arXiv
16
Scientific Communication tomorrow…?
arXiv
17
Scientific Communication tomorrow…?
arXiv
Dr. C. Conrad
Overlay journal principle
18
� Concept in principal discussed byTimothy Gowers
� University of Cambridge, UK
� Fields Medal 1998
� Elsevier Boycott 2012 (Cost of Knowledge project)
� Massively collaborative Math project Nature 461 879 (2009)
� Ideas: https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/how-might-we-get-to-a-new-
model-of-mathematical-publishing/.
� Launched Discrete Analysis 2016 as an arXiv-based overlay journalhttps://gowers.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/discrete-analysis-an-arxiv-overlay-journal
Overlay Journal Principle
Quality assessment: peer review
19
� Concept in principal discussed byTimothy Gowers
� University of Cambridge, UK
� Fields Medal 1998
� Elsevier Boycott 2012 (Cost of Knowledge project)
� Massively collaborative Math project Nature 461 879 (2009)
� Ideas: https://gowers.wordpress.com/2011/10/31/how-might-we-get-to-a-new-
model-of-mathematical-publishing/.
� Launched Discrete Analysis 2016 as an arXiv-based overlay journalhttps://gowers.wordpress.com/2015/09/10/discrete-analysis-an-arxiv-overlay-journal
Overlay Journal Principle
Public post-publication peer review
20
� Open and public process
� Fully transparent:
� Who?
� Which experience?
� What?
� Comments and Replies are openly shared
� Reviewing not limited to a narrow time frame
� Report can be cited (credited by DOI)
� Reviewer is acknowledged
Post-publication peer review (PPPR)
N. Kriegeskorte: Front Comput Neurosci. 6 (2012) 1–18
Concept has been deployed at ScienceOpen
21
� Concept has been implemented for all disciplines
at ScienceOpen
Overlay Journal and PPPR Principle
22
Case study: ScienceOpen
23
� ScienceOpen is a next generation Open Access indexing platform
� Aggregating arXiv and journal content
� Over 11 million article records yet
� 2m open access articles with full text
� All articles are open forpublic post-publication peer reviewing (PPPR)
� Further information provided per article: � # social mentions (Altmetric)
� # open access citations (Open Citation Index)
� related articles (Discovery section)
Case study: ScienceOpen
24
ScienceOpen … discuss + review
25
ScienceOpen … user profiles
Does post-publication peer review work?
26
ScienceOpen … peer review statistics
27
Sort by rating, citations, altmetric,…
28
ScienceOpen … peer review statistics
…to find relevant papers – for you/your peers
29
ScienceOpen … peer review statistics
…or to set up or curate your Collection
30
ScienceOpen… start a Collection
Collections: how does it work?
31
� Editor(s) can start a Collection on ScienceOpen
� Selecting papers from a list of over 11m articlerecords yet (arXiv plus PMC)
� Commenting these papers as Editor
� Invite peers to review (or wait for volunteers)
� Examples:
� Topical Collections
� Conference Collections
� Poster Collections…
ScienceOpen… Collections
32
ScienceOpen… Poster Collection DPG‘15
33
ScienceOpen… Paul Drude Institute
34
Collections
CC-BY SA 3.0 Wikimedia by Acdx
35
� A new way to filter content
� Independent of journal or publisher
� Filtering to narrow complexity of current researchoutcome in different aspects: topic, institution,…
� Not pre-selective but consists of those papers which arerelevant to your peers
� Flexible: not limited by (publication) dateand resource (journal) but a ‚living‘ list
� Incorporate existing resources as (OA) journals, pre-print servers or repositories (non-redundancy)
� Engages transparent and open quality assessment: public post-publication peer review process (PPPR)
� To replace classical journals…?
Collections: Advantages
36
� A new way to filter content
� Independent of journal or publisher
� Filtering to narrow complexity of current researchoutcome in different aspects: topic, institution,…
� Not pre-selective but consists of those papers which arerelevant to your peers
� Flexible: not limited by (publication) dateand resource (journal) but a ‚living‘ list
� Incorporate existing resources as (OA) journals, pre-print servers or repositories (non-redundancy)
� Engages transparent and open quality assessment: public post-publication peer review process (PPPR)
� To replace classical journals…?
Collections: Advantages
Principle of future scientific communication?
37
Scientific Publishing: Perspectives
38
Literature
www.scienceopen.com/collection/Science20
39
Scientific Publishing: Perspectives
Traditional Publishing Current Trends
journals = content containers interdisciplinary databasefor specific discipline = „megajournal“ or Collections
IF does not provide information article level metrics (altmetrics)about relevance of research
no data available open data
limiting article type to open to reproduction papersoriginal or „new“ research and negative results studies
static publication „living“ document; versioning
closed peer-review open evaluation; anonymous reviewers post-publication peer-review
no credits for reviewer acknowledgement of reviews
no interaction between (open) communication andauthors and readers active feedback
content is paywalled open access (OA)
library pays for APCs paid by governmentaljournal subscriptions or institutional funding partners
authors prefer prestigous andhighly ranked journals to publish ?
40
Thank you!
Alexander GrossmannProf. Dr. rer. nat.
HTWK LeipzigUniversity of Applied Sciences
@SciPubLab