Download - Policies on Action Research as of Oct 2015 1

7/23/2019 Policies on Action Research as of Oct 2015 1

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/policies-on-action-research-as-of-oct-2015-1 1/23

• Bond Paper Size Letter Size 8.5” x 11”

• Font Style : Tahoma

• Font Size : 12

• Text Spacing : o!"le Space

1. Preliminary Parts

1.1 The Title Page

0.5 DIVISION OF PAMPANGA

1”

1.5” 1”

1”



a. #e$earch Title i$ typed centered% highlighted% all capital letter$% $ingle $paced

and in&erted pyramid.

". 'ame o( the #e$earcher i$ typed centered% highlighted )ith the (ir$t name%middle initial and la$t name.

c. ate i$ typed centered% highlighted )ith the month and the year.

1.2 The *erti(icate o( +cceptance,+ppro&al

a. The *erti(icate o( +cceptance,+ppro&al i$ typed a(ter the title page.

". The *erti(icate o( +cceptance,+ppro&al i$ typed centered and highlighted.

The text i$ typed $ingle $paced% the title i$ typed highlighted and all capital

letter$ $imilar )ith the name o( the re$earcher.

c. The name$ o( the i&i$ion +ction #e$earch -&al!ation *ommittee are typed

highlighted and all capital letter$.

d. The name o( the School$ i&i$ion S!perintendent i$ typed centered

highlighted and all capital letter$.

. The +c/no)ledgement Sheet

a. The +*0'L-3-4-'T i$ type centered% highlighted all capital letter$.

". The text i$ do!"le $paced and a maxim!m o( t)o page$.

c. The ac/no)ledgement )ill end )ith the name o( the re$earcher% $tarting )ith

the initial$ o( the (ir$t and middle name and the (!ll name% highlighted.

. +"$tract

a. The a"$tract i$ the exec!ti&e $!mmary o( the re$earch not more that 66

)ord$.

". The "ody i$ typed do!"le $paced.

.5 The Ta"le o( *ontent$

a. The Ta"le o( *ontent$ i$ typed centered% highlighted and all capital letter$.

". The preliminary part$ )ill "e li$ted (ir$t and page$ are in #oman '!meral$.

c. The $!"7$ection$ o( the "ody o( the action re$earch are typed highlighted and

to the le(t page$ in +ra"ic '!meral$.

DIVISION OF PAMPANGA

1”

1 space

EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLEGIAL COACHING IN ENHANCINGTHE INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE OF TEACHERS



. Li$t o( Ta"le$

a. Typed in a $eparate page a(ter the la$t page o( the ta"le o( content$.

". L9ST F T+BL-S i$ typed at the center% all capital letter$ and highlighted.

c. The )ord Ta"le” i$ typed aligned )ith the le(t margin.

d. The )ord Page i$ typed aligned )ith the right margin% highlighted and (ir$t

letter i$ !pper ca$e.”

1”1.5

by

ROGELIO S. PEREZ

October 201

1”

2 spaces



e. Title$ o( the ta"le$ are type !pper ca$e and lo)er ca$e. The (ir$t letter o( the /ey

)ord$ i$ capitalized.

(. Ta"le Title$ )ith more than one line in length% the $econd line m!$t "egin "elo) the

third letter o( the (ir$t )ord in the (ir$t line title.

4. Body of the Action Research

a. The "ody o( the +ction #e$earch i$ not $eparated "y chapter. The complete

content$ o( the "ody% (or propo$al and completed action re$earch report$% are

pre$ented in the $ample Ta"le *ontent$.

". Part$ o( the "ody o( the re$earch are typed aligned to the le(t margin% highlighted

and (ir$t letter i$ capitalized.

c. The text o( each part are typed in do!"le $pace.

d. Space "et)een $!"$ection and the la$t line o( the preceding $!"$ection text i$ typedthree $pace$.

5. The Tables

1. The ta"le$ contained the re$!lt$ o( the $tati$tical treatment o( data.

2. Ta"le n!m"er i$ indicated a(ter the di$c!$$ion o( each pro"lem.

. The ta"le i$ typed at the center% +ra"ic '!meral$ and highlighted.

. The ta"le title i$ typed at the center% highlighted% $ingle $paced and in&erted pyramid

5. Ta"le title$ )hich are more that line m!$t "e typed in $ingle $pace.


1 SpaceCERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE

This action research proposal entitled “EFFECTIVENESS OFCOLLEGIAL COACHING IN ENHANCING THE INSTRUCTIONALCOMPETENCE OF TEACHERS!, prepared and submitted byROGELIO S. PEREZ, was evaluated by the Committee andrecommended or acceptance.

i

2 Spaces



!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DIVISION ACTION RESEARCH EVALUATION COMMITTEE

LEONARDO D. ZAPANTA"E#.D." CESO VI

"#C$ Schools %ivision SuperintendentChairman

CELIA R. LACANLALE" P$. D. ARCELI S. LOPEZ" P$.D.Chie Chie

Curriculum and #mplementation %ivision&ember

&ember

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2 spaces

'ccepted on 'u(ust 10, 2015.

LEONARDO D. ZAPANTA"E#.D." CESO VI"#C$Schools %ivision Superintendent


1 spaceCERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE

This action research proposal entitled “EFFECTIVENESS OFCOLLEGIAL COACHING IN ENHANCING INSTRUCTIONALCOMPETENCE OF TEACHERS!, prepared and submitted byROGELIO S. PEREZ, was evaluated by the Committee andrecommended or acceptance.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2 Spaces

2 spaces

Sin(le Space

School )overnance

and "peration%ivision

2 spaces

2 spaces





"#C$Schools %ivision SuperintendentChairman

CELIA R. LACANLALE" P$. D. ARCELI S. LOPEZ" P$.D.Chie Chie

Curriculum and #mplementation %ivision&ember

&ember

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 spaces

'ccepted on 'u(ust 10, 2015.



1 spaceCERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

This action research entitled “EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLEGIALCOACHING IN ENHANCING INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE OFTEACHERS!, prepared and submitted by ROGELIO S. PEREZ, wasevaluated by the Committee and recommended or approval.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



"#C$ Schools %ivision Superintendent

2 spaces

2 spaces

School )overnanceand "peration

%ivision

ii

2 spaces

2 spaces

2 spaces



Chairman

%%% CELIA R. LACANLALE" P$. D. ARCELI S. LOPEZ"P$.D.

Chie Chie

Curriculum and #mplementation %ivision&ember&ember

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

'pproved on "ctober 2, 2015.


Schools %ivision Superintendent


1 spaceCERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL

This action research entitled “EFFECTIVENESS OF COLLEGIALCOACHING IN ENHANCING INSTRUCTIONAL COMPETENCE OFTEACHERS!, prepared and submitted by ROGELIO S. PEREZ, was

evaluated by the Committee and recommended or approval.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



"#C$Schools %ivision SuperintendentChairman

%%%%%% CELIA R. LACANLALE" P$. D. ARCELI S. LOPEZ"P$.D.

Chie Chie Curriculum and #mplementation %ivision

&ember


%ivision

2 spaces

2 spaces

2 spaces

2 spaces


%ivision



&ember

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2 spaces

'pproved on "ctober 2, 2015.



AC&NO'LEDGEMENT

1 Tab The researcher ac*nowled(es+++..

%r. ernando &. Cru-, Schools %ivision Superintendent, School%ivision o

&arinduue, or his unceasin( (uidance+

2 spaces



R.S. Perez


A(STRACT

This study aimed to determine the e/ectiveness

o .

The research used the "ne )roup retest!osttest desi(n. There

were 20 teachers who participated in the study.

The data obtained were processed throu(h Stata usin( the ollowin(

statistical techniues mean, wei(hted mean and dependent t!test.

3esults revealed that the teachers

were .

The study recommends .

2 spaces




TA(LE OF CONTENTS

2 spaces

a(e

2 spaces

Title a(e !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i'c*nowled(ement !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

iiCerti4cate o 'cceptance !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

iii

3ationale !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

1Statement o the roblem !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2ypothesis !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!6Si(ni4cance o the Study !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

7%e4nition o Terms !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

7 Type o Study !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5articipants !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5



%ata Collection lan !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

8#nstrument !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 9%ata 'nalysis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :

3eerences ;i any< !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

='ppendices


“'” >uestionnaire !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!10

;arts o the 3esearch roposal<


Title a(e

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.

i'c*nowled(ement++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++ iiCerti4cate o

'pproval+++++++++++++++++++++++++++.iii'bstract+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

++++.iv3ationale

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.1Statement o the roblem

+++++++++++++++++++++++++.2



ypothesis

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++..6Si(ni4cance o the

Study++++++++++++++++++++++++++7%e4nition o Terms

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++5 Type o Study

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++...........8articipants

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++..

9%ata Collection lan

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++..:#nstrument

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.=%ata

'nalysis+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+..10

3esults and %iscussion

?evel o #nstructional Competence o the Teachers@eore the Colle(ial

Coachin(++++++++++++++++++++12

?evel o #nstructional Competence o the Teachers'ter the Colle(ial Coachin(++++++.

++++++++++++++..17


2 spaces

2 spaces

2 spaces



Comparison o the ?evel o the #nstructional Competenceo the Teachers @eore and 'ter Colle(ial Coachin(+++++++ .

18

Summary

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++. 1:

Conclusions+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++..1=

3ecommendations++++++++++++++++++++++++++++20

3eerences++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++21

'ppendices

“'” Certi4cate o

'cceptance+++++++++++++++++++++.22“@” >uestionnaire$Test

++++++++++++++++++++++++.26“C” 3esults o the Stata Statistical

'nalysis++++++++++++++25

;Complete arts o the 3esearch 3eport<


LIST OF TA(LES

Table

1 ?evel o #nstructional Competence

2 spaces

2 spaces

2 spaces



o the Teachers @eore Treatment !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!12

2 ?evel o #nstructional Competence

o the Teachers 'ter Treatment !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!15

;#ncluded in the inal 3esearch 3eport<


TA(LE OF CONTENTS

2 spaces

a(e

2 spaces

1 space



ampama(at na ahina

++++++++++++++++++++++++.. i3asyunale$Aatuwiran++++++++++++++++++++++++

++..1a(lalahad n(

Suliranin+++++++++++++++++++++++++..2#potesis$#poteses++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++6Aahala(ahan n(

ananali*si*++++++++++++++++++++++..7

Aahulu(an n(

Terminolo(hiya++++++++++++++++++++++.5%isenyo n(

ananali*si*+++++++++++++++++++++++++.8atun(*ulan n( a(!aaral+++++++++++++++++++++..

+..+9a(li*om n(

%atos++++++++++++++++++++++++++.++:#nstrumento++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++..=a(susuri n(

%atos++++++++++++++++++++++++++++10a(lalahad n(

3esulta+++++++++++++++++++++++++....11?a(om+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++..12Aon*lusyon+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++.163e*omendasyon++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++..17




R)t*o+),e

Teachers are the most

Coachin(, accordin( to Bise;2000<

The competence o the teachers is essential in attainin(e/ective instruction ;Co, 2005<

St)te-e+t o t$e Prob,e-

The main purpose


D)t) Co,,ect*o+ P,)+

The below indicated table indicates the speci4c activities to beunderta*en

by the researcher

1 space

2 spaces1 tab

2 spaces

2 spaces

1 tab

1 space



I+ter/e+t*o+Str)tey Act*/*t*e D)te

D)t) tobe

Co,,ecte#

Colle(ialCoachin(

%etermine the initiallevel o the teachin(competence o theteachers beore colle(ialcoachin(.

Duly 2015;2nd wee*<

E#ndividual TeacherFs

"bservationEBei(hted&ean

rovide the teachers withcolle(ial coachin( .

Duly 2015; 2nd wee*<

to"ctober

2015 ; 6rdwee*<

3esults o the

"bservation

Conduct the mid!assessment on the e/ecto colle(ial coachin(.

September2015 ;2nd

wee*<

E3esults o

the"bservatio

nEBei(hted&ean

%etermine the 4nal levelo the teachin(competence o theteachers ater colle(ialcoachin(.

"ctober2015 ;7th

wee*<

Bei(hted&ean

Note3

1. The %ata Collection lan or eperimental research.

2. The intervention$strate(y must be chan(ed i improvement isnot observed durin( the mid!assessment.

6. The %ivision 'ction 3esearch Gvaluation Committee must beinormed about the new %ata Collection lan.


D)t) Co,,ect*o+ P,)+

The below indicated table indicates the speci4c activities to beunderta*en

1 space1 space



by the researcher

Act*/*t*e D)te E45ecte# O6t56t

'naly-e data onattendance o parents inschool meetin(s andproHects completed romparentsF support.

Duly 2015

Gmpirical data on theparticipation oparents to schoolmeetin(s.

repare the researchproposal.

'u(ust 2015; 4rst to thirdwee*<

3esearch roposal

%evelop and validate theuestionnaire.

'u(ust 2015; last wee*<

Ialidateduestionnaire

Submit the researchproposal.

September ;4rstwee*<

ard copy o theproposal

Collect data rom theparticipants.

September 2015;second wee*<

illed!outuestionnaire romthe participants

rocess the data orstatistical analysis.

"ctober 2015;second wee*<

%ata processin( printout

%ata analysis and

interpretation

"ctober 2015; third to ourth

wee*<

>uantitative andualitative data ,

analy-ed andinterpreted

Submit the 4nal researchreport.

Jovember 2015;4rst wee*<

ard copy o theresearch report

Note3

The %ata Collection lan or %escriptive 3esearch


Le/e, o I+tr6ct*o+ Co-5ete+ce o t$e Te)c$e(eore t$e Co,,e*), Co)c$*+

1 space

2 spaces



#t can be observed rom the data presented in Table 1

T)b,e 1. Decr*5t*o+ o+ t$e Le/e, o t$e I+tr6ct*o+),Co-5ete+ce

o t$e Te)c$er (eore Co,,e*), Co)c$*+

#tems B.&. %.3.

1.

2.

6.

7.

'vera(e

Co-5)r*o+ o+ t$e Le/e, o I+tr6ct*o+), Co-5ete+ce o t$eTe)c$e

(eore )+# Ater Co,,e*), Co)c$*+

' perusal o the data indicated in Table

T)b,e 7. Co-5)r*o+ (et8ee+ t$e I+tr6ct*o+), Co-5ete+ce ot$e Te)c$er (eore )+# Ater Co,,e*), Co)c$*+I+tr6ct*o+

&eanst!value robability

%ecision onthe

2 spaces

1 space

2 spaces

1 space



ypothesis@eore

Colle(ialCoachin(

'terColle(ialCoachin

(

2.52 6.=0 15.80 0.073eHect

;Si(ni4cance<



E+c,o6re No. 7 to Re*o+), Me-o %%% . 2019

EVALUATION OF RESEARCH PRO:ECTS

3esearcher%ivisionosition

3esearch Title

A. MANUSCRIPT EVALUATION ;<0=>

5 Iery )ood

7 )ood

6 air2 Jeeds #mprovement

1 oor

1. The Title in relation to theproblem o the study

5 7 6 2 1

2. The statement o the problem;)eneral and Speci4c< inrelation to the title o the study

5 7 6 2 1

6. The research desi(n in relation

to the problems raised in thestudy.

5 7 6 2 1

7. The statistical techniues inrelation to the problems raisedin the study.

5 7 6 2 1

5. The analysis and theinterpretation o the data withimplications.

5 7 6 2 1

8. The conclusions drawn in theli(ht o the 4ndin(s o the study.

5 7 6 2 1

9. The easibility o therecommendation.

5 7 6 2 1

:. The ali(nment o the researchto the 3esearch '(enda.

5 7 6 2 1

=. The contribution o the researchor the improvement oproessional practice ;teachin(!learnin(, learnersFachievement$perormance,uality delivery o pro(rams

5 7 6 2 1



and services<.10.The overall impact o the

research to %epGdFs thematicareas.

5 7 6 2 1

(. ORAL PRESENTATION ; 20=>

Criteria K Score 3emar*s

1. resentation S*ills ;Clarity, Correct)rammar< with power pointpresentation

5

2. &astery o the 3esearch. 5

6. Clarity, conciseness andappropriateness o the answers tothe uestions o the oral evaluators.

5

7. "verall con4dence ;overall

personality and enthusiasm<.

5

Total 20

Gvaluator

%ate

