1
POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS OF MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS: TOXICITY, MOBILITY, AND NANOWASTES IN AQUATIC AND
SOIL SYSTEMS
By
JIE GAO
A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
2008
2
© 2008 Jie Gao
3
This dissertation is dedicated to my family, my parents and my husband, for their tremendous love and support
4
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to sincerely thank my advisor, Dr. Jean Claude J. Bonzongo, for his support,
guidance, encouragement, and most importantly, his friendship during my graduate study at the
University of Florida. I was really blessed to be under his mentorship over the past four years. I
am also very grateful to all my committee members, Dr. Gabriel Bitton, Dr. Joseph J. Delfino,
Dr. Dmitry Kopelevich, Dr. Lena Q. Ma, and Dr. Rongling Wu, for their generous help and
support during my journey as a graduate student at the University of Florida.
I would like to thank Dr. Kirk J. Ziegler and Dr. Bin Gao for their valuable assistance and
guidance on specific aspects of my research. Thanks are also extended to Peter Meyers and Craig
Watts from Hydrosphere Research for their time and patience during my training in toxicity
testing and for providing the pure cultures of Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pseudokirchneriella
subcapitata used in this research. Many thanks to Mr. Gill Brubaker and Mr. Gary Scheiffele
from Particle Engineering Research Center for letting me use the Ion Chromatography. Thanks
are also extende to Drs. Joseph Griffitt and David Barber from the Center for Environmental and
Human Toxicology for collaboration and help. Finally, I extend my gratitude to Dr. Nan Feng
and Mr. Randy Wang for their assistance with laboratory experiments, and to my fellow students
in our research group and in the Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences for their
camaraderie, kindness and support.
I would like to express very special thanks to my parents for their tremendous and
inconditional love and support. Only with their unselfish love and encouragement could I gain
self-confidence and ability to take on challenges and overcome difficulties in my life. Finally,
my thanks go to my husband, Yu Wang, for his support, patience, and unwavering love
throughout the past seven years of my college undergraduate and graduate studies.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS page
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4
LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................8
LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................10
ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................12
CHAPTER
1 NANOTECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT: APPLICATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS ....................................................................................................................15
1.1 Problem Statement............................................................................................................15 1.2 Production and Use of Nanomaterials ..............................................................................18 1.3 Potential Toxicity of Manufactured Nanomaterials .........................................................19 1.4 Potential Effects of MNs on Ecosystem Functions ..........................................................20 1.5 Environmental Fate and Transport of MNs ......................................................................22 1.6 Research Objectives..........................................................................................................23
2 POTENTIAL TOXICITY OF CARBON AND METAL BASED NANOMATERIALS.....28
2.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................28 2.2 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................31
2.2.1 Chemicals ...............................................................................................................31 2.2.2 Preparation of Nanomaterial Suspensions..............................................................31 2.2.3 96-hour Algal Chronic Toxicity Assay Using Pseudokirchneriella
subcapitata (Selenatastrum capricornutum)................................................................33 2.2.4 48-hour Acute Toxicity Assay Using Ceriodaphnia dubia as Test Model
Organism......................................................................................................................34 2.2.5 MetPLATE Test .....................................................................................................35
2.3 Results and Discussion .....................................................................................................36 2.3.1 Characterization of Nano-metal Particles...............................................................36 2.3.2 Toxicity of Solvents and Surfactants......................................................................37 2.3.3 Toxicity of Tested Nanomaterials ..........................................................................38
2.3.3.1. Fullerene (C60).............................................................................................38 2.3.3.2. Single-Walled Nanotubes (SWNTs) ...........................................................39 2.3.3.3. Metallic nanomaterials ................................................................................40
2.4 Conclusions.......................................................................................................................43
6
3 TOXICITY OF SELECTED MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS DISPERSED IN NATURAL WATERS WITH GRADIENTS IN IONIC STRENGTH AND DISSOLVED ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT..................................................................55
3.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................55 3.2 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................56
3.2.1 Collection of Water Samples..................................................................................56 3.2.2 Preparation of Nanomaterial Suspensions in Collected Water Samples ................57 3.2.3 Determination of MNs Concentrations in Prepared Suspensions ..........................57 3.2.4 Toxicity of MNs Suspended in Natural Waters .....................................................58
3.2.4.1 The Ceriodaphnia dubia assay.....................................................................58 3.2.4.2 MetPLATE test ............................................................................................59
3.3 Results and Discussion .....................................................................................................60 3.3.1 Characterization of Water Samples ........................................................................60 3.3.2 Total Concentration of Dispersed Nanomaterials ..................................................60 3.3.3 Evaluation of Acute Toxicity of Nanomaterials Suspended in Natural Waters
to Ceriodaphnia dubia .................................................................................................63 3.3.4 Acute Toxicity with MetPLATE............................................................................65
3.4 Conclusions.......................................................................................................................66
4 MOBILITY OF SINGLE-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (SWNTS) IN SATURATED HETEROGENEOUS POROUS MEDIA ......................................................74
4.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................74 4.2 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................76
4.2.1 Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Sample Preparation ...........................................76 4.2.2 Soil Sample Collection and Characterization.........................................................77 4.2.3 Column Experiments ..............................................................................................77 4.2.4 Modeling.................................................................................................................78
4.3 Results and Discussion .....................................................................................................79 4.3.1 Bromide Transport and Breakthrough Curves in Sandy and Clay soils.................79 4.3.2 SWNTs Transport in Sandy Soils...........................................................................79 4.3.3 SWNTs Transport in Clay Soils .............................................................................81
4.4 Conclusions.......................................................................................................................82
5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS ON BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES IN SEDIMENTS.........................................................89
5.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................89 5.2 Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................91
5.2.1 Preparation of Nanomaterial Suspensions..............................................................91 5.2.2 Sediment Collection ...............................................................................................91 5.2.3 Dominant Terminal Electron Accepting Processes (TEAPs) in Sediments and
Sediment Manipulation in this Study...........................................................................91 5.2.4 Analytical Techniques ............................................................................................95 5.2.5 Data Analysis..........................................................................................................95
7
5.3 Results and Discussion .....................................................................................................95 5.4 Conclusions.......................................................................................................................98
6 NANOWASTES IN THE ENVIRONMENT: THE “TROJAN HORSE EFFECT” OF NANOMATERIALS............................................................................................................103
6.1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................103 6.2 Materials and Methods ...................................................................................................104 6.3 Results and Discussion ...................................................................................................105 6.4 Conclusions.....................................................................................................................107
7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................111
7.1 Conclusions.....................................................................................................................111 7.2 Recommendations...........................................................................................................112
APPENDIX
A TESTED CONCENTRATIONS OF CARBON- AND METAL-BASED NANOMATERIALS IN THREE DIFFERENT TOXICITY ASSAYS..............................114
B TESTED CONCENTRATIONS OF MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIAL SUSPENSIONS IN TOXICITY TESTS USING THE C. DAPHNIA 48-H ACUTE TOXICITY ASSAY AND METPLATE TEST ...................................................................115
LIST OF REFERENCES.............................................................................................................116
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH .......................................................................................................135
8
LIST OF TABLES
Table page 1-1 Examples of materials and applications of nanotechnology (Karn 2004) .........................26
1-2 Examples of proposed environmental applications of manufactured nanomaterials.........27
2-1 Tested surfactants and solvents and their chemical compositions.....................................45
2-2 Characteristics of metallic nanoparticles used in toxicity experiments in this study ........46
2-3 Chemical composition of the preliminary algal assay procedure (PAAP) culture medium ..............................................................................................................................47
2-4 Concentrations of tested surfactants resulting in lethal effect on 50% of the population (LC50) based on the 48-h Ceriodaphnia dubia assay.......................................48
2-5 Surfactant concentrations resulting in the inhibition of 50% of growth (IC50) in a 96-h P. subcapitata chronic toxicity assay..............................................................................49
2-6 Percent mortality of C. dubia exposed to solutions with increasing THF concentrations in 48-h accute toxicity assay......................................................................50
2-7 Concentrations of tested metal- and carbon- based nanoparticles resulting in lethal effect on 50% of the population (LC50) based on the 48-h Ceriodaphnia dubia assay. ....51
2-8 Examples of published EC50 values for fullerenes (C60), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), and nano-copper (nano-Cu) on daphnia and zebrafish ...................52
2-9 Concentrations of tested metal- and carbon- based nanoparticles resulting in growth inhibition of 50% of the population (IC50) based on the 96-h P. subcapitata chronic toxicity assay......................................................................................................................53
2-10 Concentrations of tested metal- and carbon- based nanoparticles resulting in 50% inhibition of color development in MetPLATE test. .........................................................54
3-1 Characteristics of water samples prior to contact with C60, Ag and Cu nanoparticles ......73
4-1 Physicochemical characteristics of the sandy (Gainesville, Florida) and clayey (Atlanta, Georgia) soils used in column experiments (Feng et al. 2007). .........................87
4-2 Transport parameters estimated by CXTFIT for bromide and SWNT in GA and SDS in sandy soils......................................................................................................................88
A-1 Tested concentrations of carbon- and metal-based nanomaterials in three different toxicity assays ..................................................................................................................114
9
B-1 Tested concentrations of manufactured nanomaterial suspensions in toxicity tests using the C. daphnia 48-h acute toxicity assay and MetPLATE test ..............................115
10
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page 1-1 Conceptual diagram of the life cycle and potential pathways and fate of
manufactured nanomaterials ..............................................................................................25
2-1 Size distribution of selected metallic MN samples as obtained from commercial sources................................................................................................................................44
3-1 Map of the Suwannee River watershed and tributaries showing the three sampling locations .............................................................................................................................67
3-2 Concentrations of silver, copper, and C60 in different water samples spiked with individual nanomaterial and then filtered ..........................................................................68
3-3 Linear correlation of Cu concentrations and dissolved organic matter (DOC) in water samples SR1, SR2 and DI water (R2=0.9864). ..................................................................69
3-4 48-h LC50 values of silver- and copper-spiked water samples to Ceriodaphnia dubia .....70
3-5 Relationship between the 48-h LC50 values of nanocopper suspensions to Ceriodaphnia dubia and dissolved organic matter (DOC) concentrations in SR1, SR2, and DI water..............................................................................................................71
3-6 IC50 values of nanosilver- and nanocopper suspensions using MetPLATE test................72
4-1 Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for SWNTs transport in packed heterogeneous sandy or clay soils......................................................................................84
4-2 Breakthrough curves of experimental and simulated data of bromide (Br-) in sandy and clay soils......................................................................................................................85
4-3 Breakthrough curves of experimental and simulated data of SWNT-GA and SWNT-SDS suspensions in sandy soil columns ............................................................................86
5-1 Kinetics of acetate degradation, and nitrate, nitrite and sulfate concentrations in sediment slurries without (controls) or spiked with tested nanomaterials (C60, nanosilver, and CdSe quantum dots) .................................................................................99
5-2 Kinetics of acetate degradation, and nitrate, nitrite and sulfate concentrations in sediment slurries spiked with excess nitrate and without (controls) or with tested nanomaterial additions (C60, nanosilver, and CdSe quantum dots) .................................100
5-3 Kinetics of acetate degradation and nitrate, nitrite and sulfate concentrations in sediment slurries spiked with excess sulfate and without (controls) or with tested nanomaterial additions (C60, nanosilver, and CdSe quantum dots) .................................101
11
5-4 Pseudo-first order kinetics of acetate disappearance from sediment-slurries treated with either silver nanoparticles or CdSe quantum dots as compared to the non-treated controls.............................................................................................................................102
6-1 Percent THg converted to methyl-Hg in sediment slurries spiked with SiO2-TiO2-Hg complexes and incubated at different pH.........................................................................108
6-2 Kinetics of Hg methylation in sediment slurries spiked with SiO2-TiO2-Hg complexes at pH 4 (triangles; native pH), 5 (circles), and 6 (squares)............................109
6-3 Toxicity effect of Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) solutions obtained from leaching of virgin and Hg-loaded SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites in a 1:60 ratio (ml SPLP/mg nanomaterials)...................................................................................110
12
Abstract of Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS OF MANUFACTURED
NANOMATERIALS: TOXICITY, MOBILITY, AND NANOWASTES IN AQUATIC AND SOIL SYSTEMS
By
Jie Gao
August 2008
Chair: Jean-Claude Bonzongo Major: Environmental Engineering Sciences
Nanotechnology has been singled out by industry and governments to become the world’s
largest industrial revolution, and it carries the potential to substantially benefit environmental
quality through pollution prevention, treatment, and remediation. However, nanotechnology
could also lead to serious environmental problems since the environmental behavior and fate of
manufactured nanomaterials (MNs) are not predictable from that of chemically similar but larger
compounds. The goal of this study was to develop an understanding of the potentially complex
interplay between MNs and the health of organisms and ecosystems. The potential effects of
MNs were evaluated by testing the hypothesis that: “chemical elements used in the production of
MNs could lead to environmental dysfunctions due to: (1) the potential toxicity of these elements
and their derivatives, (2) the small size driven mobility of MNs through heterogeneous porous
media and ultimate contamination of aquifers, (3) their toxicity to microorganisms and the
resulting negative impacts on key environmental microbial catalyzed reactions, and (4) the large
surface area which would allow MNs to act as carriers/delivers of pollutants adsorbed onto
them”.
13
To address this broad hypothesis, three well-established small-scale toxicity tests (i.e. the
Ceriodaphnia dubia acute toxicity test, the Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata chronic toxicity test,
and MetPLATE™), were used. In addition, studies at the system level were conducted using a
combination of column and batch experiments to investigate the transport behavior of MNs in
heterogeneous porous media and the interactions of MNs with microbial-catalyzed oxidation of
organic matter in sediments.
Carbon (i.e. fullerenes (C60), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs)) and metal (i.e.
CdSe quantum dots, and powders of the following nanometals—Ag, Cu, Co, Ni, and Al) based
MNs, were used in different laboratory experiments. All tested MNs showed some degree of
toxicity response to either one or more of the above three microbiotests, with nano-Cu and nano-
Ag being the most toxic. The use of experimental conditions that mimic likely scenarios of MNs
introduction to aquatic systems showed that the toxicity response of test model organisms to
MNs under such conditions would be affected by key water quality parameters such as organic
matter content and solution chemistry. Column studies of SWNTs transport in heterogeneous
porous soils showed that soils characteristics and the chemical composition of MN suspensions
affect transport behaviors, and that the latter can be quantitatively predicted by use of
mathematical models such as the convection-dispersion equation. Finally, the use of sediment
slurries spiked with either each type of MNs or pollutant (i.e. mercury) bound to MNs allowed
the assessment of: (1) the impact of MNs on microbially-catalyzed oxidation of organic matter,
and (2) the potential for Hg-bound to SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites obtained from flue gas
remediation studies to become available in sedimentary environments as a function of pH.
14
Overall, these findings help shed light in the poorly studied environmental implications of
MNs. However, several questions remain unanswered as these short-term laboratory
investigations may not be able to predict the fate and transport of MNs on a long-term basis.
15
CHAPTER 1 NANOTECHNOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT: APPLICATIONS AND
IMPLICATIONS
1.1 Problem Statement
Nanoscience and nanotechnologies are currently generating an extraordinary interest as
they carry expectations that are believed to bring about changes as profound as the industrial
revolution, antibiotics, and nuclear weapons all in one (Ajayan et al. 1999). Manufactured
nanoparticles (MNs) find use in a wide variety of human activities, from medical, electronics, to
environmental research and applications. But, while the advantages of nanoscience and
nanotechnologies are multiple with many more still to be discovered, the potential implications
of this “new” technology on the environment and living organisms remain largely unknown
(Fischer and Chan 2007; Oberdorster 2004; Seetharam and Sridhar 2007; Warheit 2008). In fact,
in current high-throughput societies, one would anticipate the peak in MNs production and use to
be followed by either intentional (landfills) and/or non-intentional (diffuse) introduction of these
materials into different environmental compartments. The conceptual diagram presented in
Figure 1-1 summarizes the potential pathways and fate of MNs from “cradle to grave”. From this
simplified diagram, it is obvious that MNs could enter the environment and come in contact with
living organisms from different stages of their life cycle. Accordingly, a significant effort is
needed for “upstream determination” of the potential impacts of this emerging technology on the
environment and human health.
The literature is now quite abundant with papers dealing with both the preparation and use
of MNs in several industrial, environmental, and medical applications (Borderieux et al. 2004;
Davis 1997; Eng 2004; Florence et al. 1995; Jensen et al. 1996; Li et al. 2006; Pitoniak et al.
2003; Rutherglen and Burke 2007; Tungittiplakorn et al. 2004; Wang and Zhang 1997; Wang et
al. 2008; Yogeswaran and Chen 2008; Zajtchuk 1999). Unfortunately, and despite the current
16
ongoing discussion on MNs, the study on the environmental fate and impacts of nanoparticles
remains a frontier science. Although growing rather quickly, the number of published papers
with experimental data on this subject is still very limited.
At the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century, the UK Government
commissioned the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering to carry out an
independent study into current and future developments in nanoscience and nanotechnologies
and their potential negative implications. Their findings were published in a report entitled
“Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties”, released in July 2004
(www.royalsoc.ac.uk/policy). Amongst several key points highlighted by the study, the report
noted the lack of published data on negative impacts of MNs and recommended research into the
hazards and exposure pathways of nanoparticles to reduce the many uncertainties related to their
potential impacts on health, safety, and the environment. In parallel with their effort, and mostly
after their final report, experimental data along the lines of the above-mentioned
recommendations have been increasing in the literature. For instance, research on toxicity of
MNs on living organisms is increasing very rapidly, starting from some initial laboratory studies
exposing fish to carbonaceous MNs (Oberdorster 2004) to the widespread use of several
mammal models (Borm et al. 2004; Davoren et al. 2007; Koyama et al. 2006; Oberdorster 2000;
Wick et al. 2007), and several aquatic test model organisms (Cheng et al. 2007; Roberts et al.
2007; Smith et al. 2007; Templeton et al. 2006; Zhu et al. 2006). With regard to living
organisms, a laboratory study exposing fish to fullerenes (C60) showed that C60 could cause brain
damage, resulting in a 17-fold increase in fish brain damage as compared to non-treated controls
when exposed to 0.5 ppm of fullerene aqueous suspension (Oberdorster 2004). The observed
damage, the lipid peroxidation is known to impair the normal functioning of cell membranes and
17
has been linked to illnesses such as Alzheimer’s disease in humans. Besides the carbon based
MNs, metal nanoparticles have also shown a tendency for both bioaccumulation and toxicity.
Using optical and transmission electron microscopy, Xu et al. (2004) showed that non-
functionalized Ag nanoparticles as large as 80 nm in diameter could cross the cell membrane of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, the tested Ag-nanoparticles did not damage the cell
membrane. Similar tests on E. coli and red blood cells using functionalized gold (Au)
nanoparticles showed moderate toxicity caused by lysis of cell membranes mediated by
nanoparciles cross-linked with cationic side chains (Goodman et al. 2004). Overall, these studies
showed that NMs could accumulate in living cells. Therefore, the potential exist for MNs to be
transferred through different trophic levels. Unfortunately, the extent and potential effects of
such transfer, if any, remain unknown.
In addition to toxicity studies, and although still very limited, both the fate and transport of
MNs in natural systems have been investigated (Espinasse et al. 2007; Lecoanet et al. 2004;
Lecoanet and Wiesner 2004). Research by Lecoanet and Wiesner (2004) and Lecoanet et al.
(2004) have shown that MNs could exhibit different transport behaviors in porous media. These
findings are important with regard to the assessment of both the efficacy (e.g., when used for
remediation purposes) and environmental impacts of MNs.
The field of nanotechnology is so new that there has been little time to develop substantive
data on exposure and hazards. To date, a few studies have investigated the toxicological effects
of both direct and indirect exposure to nanomaterials, but unfortunately, no clear guidelines for
these effects exist (Colvin 2003). On the other hand, the environmental toxicity of nanomaterials
is not predictable from that of similar but common larger compounds. Finally, despite the fact
that there has been a recent increasing effort to understand ecosystems at the system level, both
18
theoretical and experimental investigations of the impacts of MNs on ecosystem functions are
still lacking.
1.2 Production and Use of Nanomaterials
Nanotechnology has been pegged by industry and governments to become the world’s
largest and fastest industrial revolution (Roco et al. 1999), due to its vast potential for use in
different fields such as medicine, electronics, chemistry, and engineering (Kung and Kung 2004;
Navalakhe and Nandedkar 2007).
According to the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH),
global investment in nanotechnology by government alone rose from $432 million in 1997 to
about $3 billion in 2003 and the predicted value of nanotech-related products will exceed $1
trillion worldwide by 2015 (Toensmeier 2004). MNs, defined as particles with 100 nm or less in
diameter, are used in semiconductor manufacture and biomedical applications, as well as
consumer products ranging from anti-aging cream to sunblocks (ETCGroupGenotype 2004;
Hund-Rinke and Simon 2006; Wiesner 2003). The production and synthesis of MNs have been
accomplished by a wide variety of techniques including sol-gel technique and arc processes, to
name a few (Farhat and Scott 2006; Niederberger et al. 2006). Several products containing
nanomaterials (e.g., Smith and Nephew antimicrobial dressings, Babolat Nanotube Power tennis
rackets, and NuCelle SunSense sunscreen) are already found on the market and many more are
anticipated, particularly with the application of nanotechnology to electronics. At least 44
elements are commercially available in nanoscale form and another 20 elements are expected to
be on the market in the near future (ETCGroup 2003). The most common nanomaterials and
their applications are listed in Table 1-1 (Karn 2004). With regard to environmental applications,
nanotechnology may offer novel materials and processes for pollution prevention and treatment
19
(Zhang and Karn 2005). Table 1-2 summarizes the environmental applications of some
nanomaterials.
1.3 Potential Toxicity of Manufactured Nanomaterials
Aside from interests in the potential applications of nanotechnology, there are also
concerns that nanoparticles may be more toxic than their bulk particles because of larger surface
area, enhanced chemical reactivity and potential for cell penetration (Monteiro-Riviere and
Orsière 2007). Studies have demonstrated that even the considerably inert TiO2 can in nano size
exert a “strong oxidizing power that attacks organic molecules” or produce highly reactive free
radicals (Adams et al. 2006; Borm 2002; ETCGroup 2003). While used in cosmetics, the
photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles can lead to the degradation of organic additives and
to the generation of active species and further induce the transformation of biological molecules
on the skin, which initiate harmful reactions or even photo-induced mutagenicity for the skin
(Picatonotto et al. 2001).
Nanotechnology has promises in many biological and pharmaceutical applications, but
knowledge of their toxicological effects on living organisms is still very limited. Due to their
small size and the ability to escape macrophages, nanoparticles can penetrate the human body via
various routes and persist in the system (Karakoti et al. 2006). They can enter human tissues via
the lungs after inhalation, through the digestive system, and through the skin by dermal contact.
Once in the body, they are able to penetrate even very small capillaries and distribute throughout
the system (Braydich-Stolle et al. 2005). A number of studies have investigated the toxicological
effects of nanomaterials both in vivo and in vitro (Jeng and Swanson 2006; Kirchner et al. 2005;
Limbach et al. 2007; Soto et al. 2007; Usenko et al. 2007). It is observed that carbon nanotubes
and fullerenes could induce the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and associated
oxidative stress, and therefore cytotoxicity (Oberdorster 2004; Pulskamp et al. 2007; Shvedova et
20
al. 2005). Nano-copper particles can distribute throughout the body into blood, brain, lung, heart,
kidney, spleen, liver, intestine and stomach, and provoke dysfunctions of the organs (Chen et al.
2006). Nano-silver particles, quantum dots and some other metal oxide nanoparticles are able to
produce ROS as well (Adams et al. 2006; Cho et al. 2007; Jain and Pradeep 2005; Kim et al.
2007; Stoimenov et al. 2002; Wang et al. 2007).
Although still in its infancy, the emerging field of nanotoxicology is fast growing. For
instance, standardized test methods are lacking in order to assess MNs safety, interpret extra-
laboratory data, and generate an online databank that is accessible to all users and manufacturers
(Kovochich et al. 2007). Therefore, knowledge of exposure to and hazard of nanomaterials are in
great need to fully understand their risks and impacts.
1.4 Potential Effects of MNs on Ecosystem Functions
Ecosystems around the world accomplish numerous “natural services” and most if not all
of them seem to have common main characteristics, including the flow of energy, the flow of
material, flow of information, and participation of biota and water. Therefore, the ability to
qualitatively and/or quantitatively characterize any of the above listed natural services can be
used to assess the impact of pollutants on ecosystem functions. Such abilities are provided by
thermodynamics, which has been successfully applied in describing the basic properties of
ecosystems (e.g. flow of matter and energy). By combining the flow of material and energy to
the participation of biota (microorganisms in this case), a series of reactions involved in
sedimentary cycling of organic carbon can be used as proxy to detect the potential impacts of
MNs on specific basic ecosystem functions. For instance, in pristine soils and sediments, the
composition and distribution of different microbial populations are usually well-established,
although changes associated with shift in seasons and other major parameters are also common.
21
However, the introduction of a pollutant to such natural systems can result in a significant impact
on the composition of microbial communities and/or their activities. In such cases, the potential
consequences could range from a simple delay in the biodegradation of organic matter to major
environmental impacts such as the production of more toxic derivatives, with bioaccumulation
potential and negative effects on ecosystem functions.
In addition, MNs, which could occur in the environment in initially non-toxic levels would
likely bioaccumulate as an acute toxic response may not be expressed. Although the ability of
MNs to behave like some lipophylic pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and
mercury remains largely unknown, it is probable that most carbonaceous MNs tend to behave
like the two chemicals. If so, they would then result in severe ecological consequences due to the
combination of bioaccumulation/biomagnification phenomena and the rather well-established
toxicity of some of these nanoparticles. Therefore, as MNs become widely used, aquatic and
terrestrial ecosystems would tend to behave as terminal sinks (Lyon et al. 2007). The reported
acute toxicity of several MNs based on laboratory experiments that use high MN-concentrations
in comparison to what might be expected in natural systems, tend to suggest that at trace
concentrations (ppt to ppb range), MNs could actually accumulate in living organisms without an
immediate toxicity response. Accordingly, such bioaccumulated MNs could make their way up
the food chain as low trophic organisms are consumed by those higher in the energy pyramid.
For instance, MNs accumulation by daphnids (Zhu et al. 2006) and earthworms (Brumfiel 2003)
could constitute a point of entry to food chains.
Unfortunately, this aspect of the potential implications of MNs has been overlooked,
despite the fact that the above observations should raise concerns about MN-impacts at a system
level.
22
1.5 Environmental Fate and Transport of MNs
Nanomaterials exhibit novel and significantly different physical, chemical, and biological
properties than their larger counterparts, and this is due primarily to their small size and unique
structure (Masciangioli and Zhang 2003). If MN applications develop as projected, nanoparticle
introduction to ground waters and soils could present significant challenges with regard to
exposure risk for both aquatic/soil organisms and human health (Colvin 2003). The aquatic
environment may become contaminated through discharges of domestic wastewater effluents
(e.g., MNs leaching from washing machines, clothes and cosmetics), and through accidental
spillage by both manufacturing and transportation industries. In addition, their use in newly
developed environmental remediation techniques (e.g. groundwater and soil remediation) would
lead to intentional introduction of MNs to natural systems. Based on current knowledge, the
small size of MNs increases the potential for their dispersion (e.g. enhanced mobility) and
exposure (e.g. crossing of cell membranes); while their large specific surface area increases
chemical reactivity—and could facilitate adsorption and transport of other toxic pollutants in the
environment. Also, when released to the environment, MNs might undergo transformations due
to aggregation, sorption/desorption, deposition and bio-uptake—and identifying factors
controlling these processes is the key to predicting their environmental fate and impact (Arnall
2003). This is because changes in MN surface chemistry in combination with shifts in key
environmental parameters such as levels and type of organic matter, pH, and ionic strength could
affect their mobility, and therefore, their environmental fate and transport (Espinasse et al. 2007;
Kanel et al. 2007; Schrick et al. 2004).
A recent study by Lecoanet et al. (2004) showed that the mobility of different MNs in
porous media could differ substantially. For instance, fullerol (C60 hydroxide, C60(OH)m, m = 22-
26) and single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) show a high mobility than silica, anatase,
23
ferroxane, alumoxane, and clusters of C60 under similar experimental conditions. These
observations point to the need to investigate the transport of MNs in porous media on a case-by-
case basis. Such studies should also take into account the physicochemical characteristics of the
matrix used as well as solution chemistry.
1.6 Research Objectives
The overall objective of this study is to assess the potential impacts of MNs on biota and
ecosystem functions. To meet this objective, a research approach was developed as screening
tools for toxicity effect identification. This first step was then followed by further laboratory
studies using selected toxic MNs to investigate (i) their toxicity under conditions representative
of natural systems, (ii) their mobility in porous media, (iii) their potential impact on basic
ecological functions (i.e., organic matter oxidation in sediment), and (iv) the fate of pollutants
adsorbed onto MNs, once released to the environment. Therefore, following this introductory
chapter on background information on nanotechnology and its implications, this dissertation is
structured as follows:
• Chapter 2 focuses on toxicological effects of several carbon and metal based nanomaterials determined by use of three small-scale bioassays: (1) an aquatic invertebrate based test—the 48-h Ceriodaphnia dubia short-term assay; (2) a freshwater algal-based test—the 96-h Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata or S. capricornutum chronic assay; and (3) a bacterial produced enzyme based test—the MetPLATE test. These tests were selected to cover different biological responses and adapted from previously published procedures for use in MNs toxicity tests
• Chapter 3 emphasizes the transformations and toxicity of MNs in natural waters. In this chapter a few selected MNs identified as toxic in Chapter 2 were tested for toxicity after being suspended into natural waters of different chemical compositions. The effects of organic matter content and ionic strength are investigated.
• Chapter 4 deals with the mobility aspects of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) in heterogeneous porous media and the use of a modeling tool to predict the transport behavior of SWNTs versus soil characteristics and solution composition.
• Chapter 5 evaluates the potential effects of selected toxic MNs on biogeochemical processes in sediment. The implication is that any toxicity on microorganisms responsible
24
for degradation of organic matter would result in ecological implications such as reduced rates of organic matter oxidation.
• Chapter 6 focuses on the environmental fate of pollutants adsorbed onto MNs. In this study, mercury (Hg) is used as an example pollutant bound to SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites, and Hg methylation is used as proxy for bioavailability of adsorbed Hg to sediment microorganisms.
• Chapter 7 provides a general conclusion and emphasizes the major findings of this study, as well as further research avenues.
25
Figure 1-1. Conceptual diagram of the life cycle and potential pathways and fate of manufactured nanomaterials (adapted from Helland et al. 2007).
Synthesis methods
NANO -PRODUCTS
AIR
SOIL
WATER
End of Life
Property Change- post -synthesis- intermediate
production
Environmental Health End Points
Living Organisms
Environment:Property Change
Exposure
Release
Release
Release
Release
End of Life
- post -synthesis- intermediate
production
Environmental Health End Points
Environment:Property Change
Exposure
Release
Release
Release
Release
Nano-Products
Synthesis methods
NANO -PRODUCTS
AIR
SOIL
WATER
End of Life
Property Change- post -synthesis- intermediate
production
Environmental Health End Points
Living Organisms
Environment:Property Change
Exposure
Release
Release
Release
Release
End of Life
- post -synthesis- intermediate
production
Environmental Health End Points
Environment:Property Change
Exposure
Release
Release
Release
Release
Nano-Products
26
Table 1-1. Examples of materials and applications of nanotechnology (Karn 2004)
Nanostructures Size Example Material or Application
Clusters,nanocrystals, quantum dots Radius: 1-10 nm Insulators, semiconductors,
metals, magnetic materials
Nanowires Diameter: 1-100 nm Metals, semiconductors, oxides, sulfides, nitrides
Nanotubes Diameter: 1-100 nm Carbon, including fullerenes, layered chalcogenides
Other nanoparticles Radius: 1-100 nm Ceramic oxides, Buckyballs
27
Table 1-2. Examples of proposed environmental applications of manufactured nanomaterials Nanomaterials Applications Sources
Cadmium and mercury removal and reduction
Skubal et al. 2002
Reduction of Cr (VI) in aqueous solution Jiang et al. 2006
Nanosized TiO2
Efficient antimicrobial agent Mitoraj et al. 2007 Poly(ethylene) glycol modified urethane acrylate (PMUA) nanoparticles
An effective means to enhance the in-situ biodegradation rate in remediation through natural attenuation of contaminants
Tungittiplakorn et al. 2005
Nanoscale iron particles
Very effective for the transformation and detoxification of a wide variety of common environmental contaminants, such as chlorinated organic solvents, organochlorine pesticides, PCBs, and heavy metals
Zhang 2003 Nurmi et al. 2005 Kanel, et al. 2006 Liu and Zhao 2007 Kanel et al. 2006
An efficient sorbent for removal and determination of organic compounds
Long and Yang 2001 Cai et al. 2005 Jin et al. 2007 Lu and Liu 2006
Carbon nanotubes
Can be employed as biosensors for the detection of a number of biomolecules
Balasubramanian and Burghard 2006
Silica-titania nanocomposites
Shows high mercury vapor removal efficiency
Pitoniak et al. 2005
28
CHAPTER 2 POTENTIAL TOXICITY OF CARBON AND METAL BASED NANOMATERIALS
2.1 Introduction
Nanomaterials and nanotechnologies have become the world’s largest and fastest industrial
revolution, with an anticipated capacity to affect many industrial activities and lead to discovery
and implementation of unique materials and devices from electronics to engineered tissues (Roco
et al. 1999). Despite these anticipated applications, the products of nanoscience and
nanotechnologies also raise concerns about their potential health and environmental impacts
(Isobe et al. 2006). Thus, while much research effort is currently directed toward exploring the
properties and applications of nanomaterials in medicinal, industrial, agricultural, and
environmental fields, the body of experimental work on the potential implications of
nanomaterials on living organisms and ecosystem functions is now fast growing in response to
the introduction of nanomaterial-based products to the market place (Biswas and Wu 2005;
Griffitt et al. 2007; Nyberg et al. 2008; Oberdorster et al. 2006; Oberdörster et al. 2005).
However, this research remains in its infancy, as new nanosized materials are being produced
and incorporated into commercial products.
In both application and implication studies, homogenous and well-dispersed suspensions of
nanoparticles are desired for best performance. For example, when individually dispersed the
single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have potential applications in biological sensing and
drug delivery systems (Zhang et al. 2005). However, current preparation methods lead to the
production of SWNTs aggregates, and without further treatment, the degree of aggregation
becomes a limiting factor in using these nanotubes (Zhang et al. 2005). On the other hand, since
the toxicity of such nanoparticles is size-dependent, their uncontrollable aggregation behavior
would likely make the interpretation of experimental results rather difficult. Therefore, the
29
determination of different physical characteristics of prepared suspensions is necessary prior, and
if possible, during toxicity studies (Oberdörster et al. 2005).
Fullerenes (C60 or buckyballs) and SWNTs have been among the most widely studied and
used carbon-based nanometerials due to their unique structural and electronic properties that
enable numerous industrial, medical and environmental applications (Ke and Qiao 2007; Lu and
Liu 2006; Rutherglen and Burke 2007; Wang et al. 2007). However, the low solubility of these
carbon-based nanomaterials in aqueous solutions has delayed their use, while stimulating
research on dispersion in aqueous solutions (Lee and Kim 2008; Matarredona et al. 2003;
Mitchell and Krishnamoorti 2007; Priya and Byrne 2008). For instance, methods have been
proposed for preparation of fullerene suspension in water using a step-wise approach that
includes dissolution into organic solvent followed by a back extraction into water (Degushi et al.
2001; Lyon 2006). Also, with the aid of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) or PVP, fullerenes (C60) could be
suspended in water at concentrations as high as 400 μg/mL (Yamakoshi et al. 1994).
Additionally, it has been reported that SWNTs can be dispersed in a number of aqueous
surfactant solutions such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate
(NaDDBS), and Triton X-100 (Wang et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2005). Unfortunately, although the
surfactant induced functionalization of SWNTs enhances their suspension/dispersion, it can also
affect their inherent properties (Garg and Sinnott 1998), and likely, modify their interactions
with and impacts on living cells.
It is estimated that the worldwide market for nano-products would reach $1 trillion by
2015 (Roco 2005). This anticipated large production of nanomaterials and their likely
widespread use could lead to new environmental problems, such as new classes of toxins and
related environmental hazards (Masciangioli and Zhang 2003). With regard to human health, the
30
nano size enables nanoparticles to penetrate the human body via respiratory routes, skin or
digestive system exposures and persist without being phagocytosed (Karakoti et al. 2006).
Nanomaterials could even distribute throughout out the entire body, cross the blood-brain barrier,
and reach the olfactory bulb and the cerebellum (Braydich-Stolle et al. 2005). At the cellular
level, nanoparticles could interact with the cell lipid-bilayer membrane or other membrane
receptors, or enter the cells passively or actively (Tetley 2007). Realizing the toxicological
effects of nanoparticles, scientists have tested and demonstrated the toxicity of various
nanoparticles through both in vitro and in vivo assays (Jeng and Swanson 2006; Limbach et al.
2007; Soto et al. 2005; Usenko et al. 2007). Although inconclusive in most instances, the toxicity
of nanomaterials is hypothesized to result from a variety of effects including (i) the chemical
composition and the ability of a given nanoparticle to release free radicals, (ii) the particle size
and geometry, (iii) surface area and reactivity, (iv) surface treatments or modifications, (v) the
degree of aggregation/agglomeration, and (vi) particle electrostatic attraction potential (Gwinn
and Vallyathan 2006; Lanone and Boczkowski 2006; Long et al. 2007; Nel et al. 2006; Smith et
al. 2007; Tang et al. 2007).
As more and more nano-products are manufactured and used, chances of them being
released to the environment at different stages of their life cycle would also increase (see Figure
1-1). Recently, concerns over the potential environmental impacts of carbonaceous and metallic
nanomaterials have led to extensive toxicological studies (Braydich-Stolle et al. 2005; Ji et al.
2007; Lyon et al. 2006; Manna et al. 2005; Oberdorster 2004; Papis et al. 2007). However,
results obtained from most of these toxicity experiments are not easily used to predict the actual
effects of nanomaterials in natural systems (Fischer and Chan 2007).
31
In this study, a wide variety of carbon- and metal-based nanomaterials is screened for their
potential toxicity using three different small-scale micro-biotests (i.e. MetPLATE, Ceriodaphnia
dubia and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata tests). The ultimate objective is to identify
nanomaterials with toxicity effects and use such toxic nanoparticles in further investigations
focusing on their potential impacts in natural systems.
2.2 Materials and Methods
2.2.1 Chemicals
Besides water, different solvents and surfactants used in the preparation of MNs
suspensions could lead to erroneous toxicity results. This is because certain solvents/surfactants
can be highly toxic to some organisms. To eliminate this uncertainty, the toxicity of 6 surfactants
and 2 organic solvents commonly used to obtain highly dispersed carbon-based nanomaterial
suspensions was determined first (see Table 2-1). Besides the poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) and
tetrahydrofuran (THF) which were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Atlanta, GA, USA), the rest
of the tested surfactants were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). For toxicity
tests, Nanopure® water was used to prepare a concentrated solution of 50 g/L for PVP, and 10
g/L solutions for each of the other surfactants. These stock solutions were then used to prepare
necessary dilutions for toxicity tests. THF solutions were prepared by direct dilution of aliquot
volumes into Nanopure® water to produce samples with increasing concentration gradients and
then tested for toxicity.
2.2.2 Preparation of Nanomaterial Suspensions
Single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) suspensions were prepared using an initial mass
of ~ 40 mg of raw SWNTs (Rice HPR 145.1, Rice University, Houston TX). The SWNTs were
mixed with 200 mL of an aqueous Gum Arabic (GA) surfactant solution (1 wt. %) to produce an
initial concentration of ~200 μg/mL. To obtain a highly dispersed suspension from this initial
32
solution, the mixture was homogenized using a high-shear IKA T-25 Ultra-Turrax mixer for ~
1.5 h followed by ultrasonication using a Misonix S3000 for 10 min. The mixture was then
ultracentrifuged at 20,000 rpm (Beckman Coulter Optima L-80 K) for 2.5 h. The supernatant was
carefully separated from the aggregated nanotubes at the bottom of the tube. For the produced
suspension, visible absorbance spectra of SWNTs were recorded by a Nano-Fluorescence
Nanospectrolyzer (Applied NanoFluorescence, LLC), and the concentrations of SWNTs
suspensions determined by absorbance at 763 nm.
The preparation method for aqueous suspensions of fullerenes (nC60) was adapted from
Deguchi et al. (2001). Briefly, ~15 mg of C60 (99.5%, Term-USA) were added to 500 ml of THF,
bubbled with ultra-high purity (UHP) nitrogen for 1 h to remove oxygen, and then sealed and left
stirring at room temperature for 24 h. Excess solids were later filtered out using a 0.45 μm PTFE
membrane filter, resulting in a transparent pink solution. The filtrate was then added to equal
amount of water in a container placed in a water bath and purged with UHP-N2 until all THF was
evaporated. Next, the obtained solution was vacuum-filtered through 0.45 μm cellulose into a
flask and stored in the dark. To determine the final concentration of the obtained aqueous
fullerene suspension, the fullerene suspension, a 2% NaCl solution and toluene were mixed in a
1:1:2 ratio and sonicated for 10 minutes. After separation of the aqueous and organic phases, the
upper toluene layer was withdrawn for absorbance measurement at 334 nm (Deguchi et al. 2001)
using a Hach DR/4000U Spectrophotometer.
The nano-metals, nano-copper, nano-silver, nano-nickel, and nano-cobalt used in this study
were provided gratis by Quantum Sphere Incorporated (Santa Ana, CA, USA). Nano-aluminum
powder was purchased from NovaCentrix (Austin, TX, USA). Prior to use, nanometallic
particles were characterized as received in the Particle Engineering Research Center at the
33
University of Florida, including specific surface area, particle size distribution (PSD), and zeta
potential (ζ). Density and specific surface area were measured using a Quantachrome Nova 1200
(Quantachrome, Syossett, NY, USA), and zeta potential was measured using a Zeta Reader Mk
21-II (Zeta Potential Instruments, Inc). Particle size distributions were measured with a Coulter
LS 13 320. To evaluate their toxicity, 200 mg/L suspensions were dissolved separately in
nanopure water, and shaken at room temperature for 48 hours.
In each case, preliminary experiments were performed with a range of doses up to 1 g/L
for the surfactants and PVP. Concentrations above 1 g/L were not tested, since they are rarely
encountered in the environment. According to Deguchi et al. (2001), less than 1 ppm of THF
remains in nC60/water suspension when using his proposed method. Therefore, three THF
concentrations were chosen (0.1 ppm, 1 ppm, and 10 ppm) to study the direct toxicity of THF to
Ceriodaphnia dubia.
2.2.3 96-hour Algal Chronic Toxicity Assay Using Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Selenatastrum capricornutum)
The preliminary algal assay procedure (PAAP) culture medium was prepared from stock
solutions according to EPA standard method (USEPA 2002), which includes three groups of
salts: major salts, trace salts and micro salts (see PAAP chemical composition in Table 2-2). The
pH of the culture medium was adjusted to 7.5 ± 0.1 with 0.1N NaOH or 0.1N HCl and then
filtered through a 0.45 μm and sterilized by autoclaving. A pure culture of P. subcapitata was
obtained from Hydrosphere Research (Alachua, FL) and grown in PAAP medium with EDTA at
around 25°C. Light source (86 ± 8.6 μE m-2s-1 or 400 ± 40ft-c) and continuous aeration were
provided 24 hours per day. New cultures were prepared every week under sterile conditions by
transferring approximately 20-30 mL of the mature cultures to 1-2 L of fresh sterile media.
34
Toxicity tests were performed in autoclaved 125 ml Erlenmeyer flasks according to EPA
(2002). All sample dilutions (i.e. culture media spiked with increasing concentrations of
individual tested nanomaterials—see Appendix A) and negative controls were run in triplicates
and inoculated with 1ml of a 4 to7 day old algal cultures. They were pre-concentrated to obtain a
cell density of about 5 × 105 cells/ml PAAP. All flasks were placed under the fluorescent lights
in the same growth conditions. The growth inhibition after 96-h was determined by measuring
the concentrations of chlorophyll (chl. a) using a TurnerR QuantechTM digital filter fluorometer.
In this case, the measured toxicity endpoint was growth inhibition (I). On the basis of the
obtained chl. a concentrations, the IC50 (i.e. concentration that inhibits 50% of algal growth) was
determined by first plotting sample concentrations (X-axis) versus the percent inhibition (I%)
determined using Eq. 2-1 (Y-axis), and then performing a regression analysis in the linear
portion of the obtained line, from which the IC50 was determined using Eq. 2-2.
100].[].[
1 ×⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−=
control
sample
achl achl
% I (2-1)
SY
IC erceptint−=
5050 (2-2)
Where [chl.a] corresponds to measured chlorophyll concentration; Yintercept is the inhibition value
corresponding to the intercept of the above regression line with the Y-axis; and S is the slope of
the linear regression.
2.2.4 48-hour Acute Toxicity Assay Using Ceriodaphnia dubia as Test Model Organism
Moderately hard water (MHW) prepared following the EPA standard method (USEPA
2002) was used as culture media in this test. Pure culture of C. dubia were obtained from
Hydrosphere Research (Alachua, FL) and kept in 1L beakers containing 500mL of MHW in a
PervicalTM model # E-30 BX environmental chamber at 25 ºC with constant aeration. The photo
35
period was 16 hr light/8 hr dark. C. dubia was fed with concentrated P. subcapitata cells and
YCT (made from yeast, cereal leaves and trout chow). The daphnia were fed every other day
with 6.67 mL YCT and 6.67 mL algae solution/L culture. The culture medium was also changed
every other day. Neonates of less than 24 hours were separated from adults daily and used for
testing.
Acute toxicity tests were performed according to EPA’s protocol (USEPA 2002). MHW
served as negative control and as the diluent to prepare media with increasing concentrations of
tested nanomaterials. Neonates less than 24 hours were separated from adults and fed 2 hours
prior to test start. For each test, groups of 5 daphnia neonates each were transferred into several
30 ml plastic cups containing 20 ml of MHW (controls) or MHW plus nanomaterials
(treatments—see Appendix A). There was no feeding during the tests and survival was
determined visually after 48 hours using death and/or immobilization as endpoint. To determine
the LC50 (i.e. concentration that causes the death of 50% of test organisms), the organism were
exposed to at least five different and increasing concentrations in triplicates (Appendix A).
Finally, the LC50 values of daphnia test and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were
calculated by the probit analysis (U. S. EPA Probit Analysis Program, Ver. 1.5), and values were
considered different when the calculated CIs did not overlap.
2.2.5 MetPLATE Test
The MetPLATE test kit specific to heavy metal toxicity (Bitton et al. 1994) was used in
this study. The kit contains a bacterial reagent (an E.coli strain), a buffer, chlorophenol red
galactopyranoside (CPRG), which serves as the substrate for β-galactosidase, and moderately
hard water (MHW) used as diluent (Bitton et al. 1994). The kit also includes a positive control
containing copper (Cu). Briefly, the bacterial reagent was hydrated with 5-ml of MHW and
thoroughly mixed by vortexing. Then, a 900 μl aliquot of the MN suspension (or 900 μl of MHW
36
for negative controls) was added to a test tube containing 100 μl of the above-described bacterial
reagent. The test tubes were then vortexed and incubated for 1.5 hours at 35 ºC. Following the
incubation period, a 200-μl aliquot was transferred to a 96-well microplate to which 100 μl of the
enzyme substrate (i.e. CPRG) was added. After mixing, the microplate was incubated at 35 ºC to
allow color development. The response was quantified at 570 nm using a Multiskan microplate
reader. The measured toxicity endpoint was inhibition of color development, and the IC50 values
for MetPLATE assays were determined as described earlier for the IC50 in the algal test by
replacing [chl.a] with absorbance (see equations 2-1 and 2-2). All treatments (see Appendix A)
were run in triplicates.
2.3 Results and Discussion
2.3.1 Characterization of Nano-metal Particles
Particle size distributions for the nano-metals tested are shown in Figure 2-1. While
aggregation resulted in increased mean particle diameter, nano-copper, nano-silver, and nano-
cobalt still had a significant fraction of particles with size <100 nm. Specific surface areas and
zeta potentials for different nanometal powders are shown in Table 2-2. Among the nano-metal
particles, nano-nickel had the largest surface area (50.6 m²/g), and although nano-silver particles
showed rather nanoscale particles (as defined by nanotechnology, <100 nm), the particles surface
area (14.5 m²/g) was relatively small compared to other nanometals.
The zeta potential is related to the stability of particle dispersions. Therefore, particles with
high zeta potential (negative or positive) are electrically stabilized, and nano-copper will have
the highest tendency to agglomerate in water as it has a very low zeta potential (ζ = -0.69 mV,
Table 2-2).
37
2.3.2 Toxicity of Solvents and Surfactants
Using the algal and daphnia tests described above (MetPlate not used because of its
specificity to heavy metal toxicity), the toxicity of a number of surfactants/solvent was
determined (Tables 2-4 and 2-5). Among the tested dispersing agents, only Gum Arabic (GA)
and PVP showed no toxicity at concentration as high as 1 g/L. SDS had the highest toxic
response with both tests (LC50 of 48-h daphnia test: 0.003 g/L, 95% CI = 0.002-0.005 g/L ; IC50
of 96-h algal test: 0.0738 g/L), followed by SDBS (LC50 of 48-h daphnia test: 0.01 g/L, 95% CI
= 0.008-0.012 g/L; IC50 of 96-h algal test: 0.0793 g/L), Triton X-15 (LC50 of 48-h daphnia test:
0.014 g/L, 95% CI = 0.007-0.024 g/L), Triton X-100 (LC50 of 48-h daphnia test: 0.026 g/L, 95%
CI = 0.025-0.028 g/L; IC50 of 96-h algal test: 0.0917 g/L), sodium cholate (LC50 of 48-h daphnia
test: 0.053 g/L, 95% CI = 0.045-0.064 g/L). The effect of different surfactants varied with both
concentration (e.g., Smith et al. 2007) and type of tested model organisms. The results indicate
that solution matrix used to suspend nanomaterials should be tested to select model test
organisms to determine the toxicity of a given nanomaterial. In this study, GA was identified as
one of the least toxic surfactants to model aquatic organisms selected for this study. The latter
was then used to prepare all SWNT suspensions discussed in this dissertation.
Tetrahydrofuran, a bio-aggressive solvent has been used in many studies to prepare
aqueous suspensions of fullerenes (C60). Using C. dubia, the toxicity of relatively low-level THF
solutions was assessed. Table 2-6 showed the mortality of C. daphnia exposed to THF
concentrations of 0.1, 1.0 and 10 ppm. These results imply that trace THF concentrations (~0.1
ppm) present in C60 suspensions (Degushi et al. 2001) should not be toxic to C. dubia, unless it
affects the properties of native C60 to render them toxic.
38
2.3.3 Toxicity of Tested Nanomaterials
2.3.3.1. Fullerene (C60)
The LC50 of the aqueous suspension of fullerenes (nC60) using the 48-hour daphnia test
was 0.395 mg/L (95% CI = 0.287-0.470 mg/L) (Table 2-7). This value compares quite well with
numbers reported by several other studies using freshwater model microorganisms (Table 2-8).
The calculated IC50 based on the 96-h algal test was 0.139 mg/L (Table 2-9).
In this study, specific mechanisms of C60-toxicity were not investigated. However, studies
reporting on the mechanisms of toxicity of several nanomaterials including C60 are available in
the literature. The toxicity of C60 results from oxidative stress induced by production of reactive
oxygen species (ROS) (Oberdorster 2004; Sayes et al. 2005; Yamakoshi et al. 2003), residual of
organic solvent used to disperse C60 particles (Gharbi et al. 2005; Henry et al. 2007), or
interaction between C60-particles and living cells (Usenko et al. 2007). The generation of ROS
(e.g. 1O2) by C60 through energy transfer has been detected in toxicological studies (Isakovic et
al. 2006) and the pathway of ROS production has been summarized as follows (Arbogast et al.
1991):
However, this mechanism is subject to an ongoing debate since C60 has also been identified
as antioxidant that can efficiently scavenge free radicals (Gharbi et al. 2005; Krusic et al. 1991;
Lin et al. 1999; Wang et al. 1999), in addition to the fact that the toxicity effects of C60 have also
been detected in the total absence of light (Isakovic et al. 2006; Sayes et al. 2004).
1C60 1C60* 3C60
* 1C60 3O2
1O2
Triplet Quencher (Q) hν
Intersystem Crossing
39
As stated earlier, C60 particles are hydrophobic and stable water suspension can be
obtained by use of organic solvent (e.g. THF). Although mass spectroscopy of solvent after this
procedure indicated no residual THF in solution (Sayes et al. 2005), it was shown that
approximately 10% THF (w/w) was intercalated into nC60 crystalline lattice after preparation
(Fortner et al. 2005). This trapped THF, although undetectable through analysis of the aqueous
phase, could have toxic implications when nanopaticles interact with living cells. The positive
aspect in favor of THF remains its actual concentration as demonstrated by Harhaji (2007) and
in this study, pure THF would not cause cell death at concentrations up to 10 μg/ml. Also,
Markovic (2007) attributed the higher toxicity of THF-nC60 compared to other fullerene
dispersions prepared with other surfactants/solvents to the less 1O2-quenching power of THF.
In this study, P. subcapiata cells were more sensitive to C60 toxicity than C. daphnia. It
could be because the exposure time for algae was longer and more ROS were produced in the
algal test set-up where artificial light was used.
2.3.3.2. Single-Walled Nanotubes (SWNTs)
As stated earlier, SWNTs suspensions used in this study were prepared in Gum Arabic and
will be referred to herein as SWNT-GA. Toxicity tests using SWNT-GA resulted in LC50 of 0.27
mg/L (95% CI = 0.229-0.294 mg/L) with the 48-h daphnia test and an IC50 of 0.769 mg/L with
the 96-h algal test (Table 2-7 and 2-9).
If released into aqueous systems, carbon nanotubes could be taken up by aquatic
organisms, such as particle feeders with potential negative effects (Roberts et al. 2007). Similar
to C60, SWNTs can also generate ROS and cause oxidative stress (Helland et al. 2007; Manna et
al. 2005), but their potential to induce oxidative stress is mainly due to the presence of metal
impurities such as Fe, Ni, Y and Co (Guo et al. 2007; Lanone and Boczkowski 2006). This is to
some extent supported by the results of toxicological studies comparing the effects of purified
40
(e.g. iron free) versus unrefined (Fe-contaminated) carbon nanotubes (Miyawaki et al. 2008;
Templeton et al. 2006). This is because electron capture by metal impurities induces the
formation of superoxide radical (O2·-) and additional ROS through a Fenton-like reaction (Nel et
al. 2006; Pulskamp et al. 2007). Shvedova et al. (2003) have suggested that iron residual in
unrefined SWNTs could catalyze the production of free radicals through the following reactions:
Fe2+ + O2 → Fe3+ + O2- (2-3)
Fe3+ + Ared- → Fe2+ + Aox (2-4)
O2- + O2
- + 2H+ → O2 + H2O2 (2-5)
H2O2 + Fe2+ → Fe3+ + OH- + ·OH (2-6)
LOOH + Fe2+ → Fe3+ + LO· + -OH (2-7)
On the contrary, Kang et al. (2007) demonstrated that highly purified SWNTs still caused
cell membrane damage, due to direct physical interactions between nanomaterials and cells. In
this case, the degree of particle aggregation plays an important role in toxicity, and refined
SWNTs could actually be more toxic than unrefined because they are better dispersed and could
pierce or permeate cell membranes (Tian et al. 2006).
The SWNTs used in this study were not purified, i.e. they contained a certain amount of
impurities, mostly iron (Dr. Ziegler, UF-Chemical Engineering Dept– personal communication).
Therefore, the toxicity detected here may result from any or a combination of the above listed
factors.
2.3.3.3. Metallic nanomaterials
Nanoscale copper and silver resulted in toxic responses regardless of the toxicity test used,
with the calculated EC50’s (concentration that causes 50% of the maximum effect) ranging from
41
0.4 mg/L (C. dubia) to 23.93 mg/L (MetPLATE) for nano-copper, and from 0.06 mg/L (C.
dubia) to 20.92 mg/L (MetPLATE) for nano-silver. The MetPLATE test generally gave higher
EC50 values (Table 2-10) because of its specificity to bioavailable metals. In addition,
MetPLATE is not very sensitive to nickel, cobalt and aluminum (Bitton et al. 1994). Amongst all
tested nanometals, nano-aluminum particles had the least toxic effects, with EC50 values of 3.91
mg/L with C. dubia and 8.29 mg/L with P. subcapitata.
Due to their small size, nano-copper particles can easily distribute throughout the body of
vertebrates into blood, brain, lung, heart, kidney, spleen, liver, intestine and stomach; and their
large specific surface area could result in high reactivity leading to tissue/organ dysfunctions
(Chen et al. 2006). It has been suggested that once inside organism’s stomach, nanocopper
particles could react with protons (H+) from gastric juice and become quickly ionized, resulting
in an overload of ionic copper (Meng et al. 2007). In this case, the depletion of H+ would then
lead to a massive formation of HCO3- and induction of metabolic alkalosis. Finally, nanocopper
(nano-Cu) toxicological effects are probably not due solely to dissolution properties as
nanocopper particles are capable of catalyzing the production of reactive species as well (Griffitt
et al. 2007).
Silver ions have long been used as efficient antimicrobial agent and similar effects are
anticipated for nano-silver particles. Lok et al. (2006) suggested that the antimicrobial activity of
nano-silver particles is associated with Ag+, formed on the particle surface due to partial
oxidation. In a study of nine different nanomaterials, Soto et al. (2007) found nano-silver to be
amongst the highly toxic nanoparticles. In addition, he found no correlation between toxicity and
particle specific surface areas, which is in agreement with our results. The mechanism of silver
toxicity is rather well understood. Ag+ could enter cells via apical sodium channels because it
42
mimics Na+ (Glover and Wood 2005). Once inside the cell, Ag+ inhibits sodium and chloride
transport and consequently disturbs ion homeostasis (Glover et al. 2005). Similar to most
nanoparticles, the nanosize aggravates the toxicity of silver with the smaller particles being more
toxic.
Overall, no strong relationship between particle surface area (listed in Table 2-2) and
particle toxicity for studied model organisms is apparent. However, particle size is one of the
possible influencing factors, as particles with the smallest particle sizes (nano-copper and nano-
silver) showed the highest toxicity. Compared to copper and silver nanoparticles, less effort has
been made toward understanding the aquatic toxicity of other nanometals. Zhang et al. (2006)
have compared the toxicity of ultrafine and standard-sized nickel particles and found
significantly higher effects with the ultrafine nickel. However, they didn’t elucidate the toxicity
mechanism but speculated that generation of free radicals might be the reason. Although
MetPLATE didn’t show negative results with nano-nickel in our study, Liu et al. (2007)
observed a release of Ni from unrefined SWNTs in aqueous solutions and the mobilization was
more pronounced under acidic conditions, indicating nickel corrosion by acid.
Cobalt is known for its high catalytic activity for the degradation of hydrogren peroxide
and generation of ROS, and while cell membranes are commonly repulsive to toxic metal ions,
they tend to facilitate the uptake of nanosize particles, which later dissolve and damage the cell
(Limbach et al. 2007). Papis et al. (2007) found that nanocobalt could activate cellular pathways
of defense and repair mechanisms but no molecular mechanism was concluded.
A study by Braydich-Stolle et al. (2005) involved cytotoxicity testing of aluminum
nanoparticles. Like our results, they observed much less effect with nano-aluminum (nano-Al)
43
compared with nanosilver (nano-Ag) and nanomolybdenum (nano-Mo). Hussain et al. (2005)
revealed that nanoaluminum didn’t display toxicity up to the concentration of 100 ppm.
For all the nanometals, their tested concentrations in the literature were generally higher
than the EC50 values we obtained from C. daphnia and algal tests, indicating that these two tests
are very sensitive and appropriate for toxicity screening test.
2.4 Conclusions
In this study, we assessed the potential toxicity of various nanoparticles and evaluated the
potential effects of different particle dispersing agents on model test organisms. The results show
that surfactants common in the manufacturing and dispersion of carbon-based nanomaterials can
add to the toxicity of tested nanoparticles. Accordingly, toxicity tests evaluating the biological
impact of nanomaterials should take into account the effect of not only the chemical impurities
associated with the fabrication processes, but also the role of the fluid used to maximize the
dispersion effect. This study also demonstrates the need for multiple toxicity tests in assessing
the potential implications of nanomaterials. Depending on the sensitivity of test organisms and
route of exposure, a nanomaterial can be highly toxic to a given test organism while not toxic at
all to another. Finally, the observed toxic responses in lower trophic level aquatic organisms
support the need for vertebrate toxicity-based studies. In addition, the investigation of the ability
of nanomaterials to bioaccumate and ultimately biomagnify along food chains should be
examined.
44
Figure 2-1. Size distribution of selected metallic MN samples as obtained from commercial sources
45
Table 2-1. Tested surfactants and solvents and their chemical compositions. The chemical formula of GA is not included because it consists of multiple chemical compounds
Surfactants and Solvent Chemical Composition Gum Arabic from acacia tree (reagent grade) NA** Dodecylbenzene-sulfonic acid sodium (SDBS) C18H29NaO3S Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) C12H25O4S.Na Sodium cholate hydrate (98%) C24H39NaO5· xH2O
Triton X-15 glycols, polyethylene, mono ((1, 1, 3, 3-tetramethylbutyl) phenyl) ether
Triton X-100 (C2H4O)nC14H22O Tetrahydrofuran (THF) C4H8O Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) (C6H9NO)n
46
Table 2-2. Characteristics of metallic nanoparticles used in toxicity experiments in this study Nanometals Tested for Toxicity
Specific Surface Area (m²/g)
Zeta Potential (ζ) (mV)
Nano-silver 14.53 -27.0 Nano-copper 30.77 -0.69 Nano-aluminum 27.26 + 18.2 Nano-cobalt 36.39 + 17.8 Nano-nickel 50.56 + 21.9
47
Table 2-3. Chemical composition of the preliminary algal assay procedure (PAAP) culture medium
Macronutrient Concentration (mg/L) NaNO3
MgCl2·6H2O CaCl2·2H2O
MgSO4·7H2O K2HPO4 NaHCO3
25.5 12.2 4.41 14.7 1.04 15
Micronutrient Concentration (μg/L) H3BO3
MnCl2·4H2O ZnCl2
CoCl2·6H2O CuCl2·2H2O
Na2MoO4·2H2O FeCl3·6H2O
Na2EDTA·2H2O Na2SeO4
185 416 3.27 1.43 0.012 7.26 160 300 2.39
48
Table 2-4. Concentrations of tested surfactants resulting in lethal effect on 50% of the population (LC50) based on the 48-h Ceriodaphnia dubia assay.
Tested Surfactants LC50 (g/L)
CI
(g/L) Gum Arabic >1 Dodecylbenzene-sulfonic acid sodium 0.01 0.008-0.012 Sodium dodecyl sulfate 0.003 0.002-0.005 Sodium cholate 0.053 0.045-0.064 Triton X-15 0.014 0.007-0.024 Triton X-100 0.026 0.025-0.028 Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) >1 * CI = confidence interval; and LC50 values shown as >1 indicate that no toxicity effect was observed for surfactant tested at concentration up to 1g/L.
49
Table 2-5. Surfactant concentrations resulting in the inhibition of 50% of growth (IC50) in a 96-h P. subcapitata chronic toxicity assay.
Tested Surfactants
IC50 (g/L)
Gum Arabic >1 Dodecylbenzene-sulfonic acid sodium 0.0793 Sodium dodecyl sulfate 0.0738 Sodium cholate >1 Triton X-15 >1 Triton X-100 0.0917 Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) >1 * IC50 values shown as > 1 indicate that no toxicity effect was observed for surfactant tested concentration up to 1g/L.
50
Table 2-6. Percent mortality of C. dubia exposed to solutions with increasing THF concentrations in 48-h accute toxicity assay.
Concentration of THF (ppm) Mortality of C. Dubia (%) 0.1 0 1 13.33 ± 11.55 10 26.67 ± 11.55
51
Table 2-7. Concentrations of tested metal- and carbon- based nanoparticles resulting in lethal effect on 50% of the population (LC50) based on the 48-h Ceriodaphnia dubia assay.
Tested Nanomaterials LC50 (mg/L)
Confidence Interval(mg/L)
Nano-silver 0.066 0.053-0.075 Nano-copper 0.401 0.329-0.456 Nano-cobalt 1.647 1.522-1.734 Nano-nickel 0.658 0.549-0.984 Nano-aluminum 3.906 3.321-4.410 Fullerenes (C60) 0.395 0.287-0.470 SWNT suspended in Gum Arabic (GA) 0.74 0.63-0.81
52
Table 2-8. Examples of published EC50 values for fullerenes (C60), single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), and nano-copper (nano-Cu) on daphnia and zebrafish
Tested Nanomaterials Test Model Organisms EC50 References
C60 Daphnia sp 460 ppb Lovern and Klaper 2006 C60 Embryonic zebrafish <200 ppb Usenko et al. 2007 C60 Daphnia magna 800 ppb Zhu et al. 2006
SWNTs Daphnia magna 10 - 20 ppm Roberts et al. 2007 Nano-copper Danio rerio (Zebrafish ) 1.56 ppm Griffitt et al. 2007
53
Table 2-9. Concentrations of tested metal- and carbon- based nanoparticles resulting in growth inhibition of 50% of the population (IC50) based on the 96-h P. subcapitata chronic toxicity assay.
Tested Nanomaterials IC50 (mg/L)
Nano-silver 0.196 Nano-copper 0.542 Nano-cobalt 0.707 Nano-nickel 0.348
Nano-aluminum 8.285 Fullerenes (C60) 0.139
SWNT suspended in Gum Arabic (GA) 2.11
54
Table 2-10. Concentrations of tested metal- and carbon- based nanoparticles resulting in 50% inhibition of color development in MetPLATE test. Tested Nanomaterials IC50 (mg/L)
Nano-silver 20.92 ± 0.61 Nano-copper 23.93 ± 0.51 Nano-cobalt Not detected Nano-nickel Not detected
Nano-aluminum Not detected Fullerenes (C60) Not detected
SWNT suspended in Gum Arabic (GA) Not detected * Besides nanosilver and nanocopper, no toxicity effect was observed with all the other tested nanoparticles.
55
CHAPTER 3 TOXICITY OF SELECTED MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS DISPERSED IN NATURAL WATERS WITH GRADIENTS IN IONIC STRENGTH AND DISSOLVED
ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT
3.1 Introduction
The success of nanotechnologies and the resulting widespread production and use of
manufactured nanomaterials (MNs) will likely lead to their introduction to natural systems.
Rivers/lakes are likely to behave as primary sinks as they integrate pollutants from atmospheric
deposition, terrestrial surface runoffs, and groundwater discharges. In the past few years, several
studies focused on the potential toxicity of MNs, using existing experimental procedures, which
are not always adequate to assess the environmental implications of these new pollutants. If
current efforts to understand the biological effects of MNs on human health have relied on
appropriate techniques such as inhalation exposures, studies emphasizing the environmental
implications use primarily very drastic approaches to facilitate the contact between MNs and test
model organisms.
Man made nanoparticles can enter aquatic systems through direct discharges (e.g.
accidental spills and surface runoffs), but also through industrial and/or domestic wastewater
effluents. For instance, the use of nano-silver (nano-Ag) particles in washing machines (e.g.
washers manufactured by Samsung Electronics) could release nano-Ag particles into sewer
systems (Christen 2007; Lovern et al. 2007). Since current wastewater treatment plants are ill-
equipped for MNs removal, these MNs would ultimately enter natural waterways. So far,
laboratory studies on toxicity of MNs have focused on their impacts on model organisms (Du et
al. 2008; Fortner et al. 2005; Griffitt et al. 2007; Lovern et al. 2007; Rameshbabu et al. 2007;
Wei et al. 2007; Yoon et al. 2007; Zhu et al. 2006). Although highly informative, results from
most of these toxicity studies are usually obtained under conditions that are far different from
56
those encountered in natural systems. For example, the use of drastic mixing methods (e.g.
ultrasound, sonication, etc), toxic solvents/surfactants (e.g. toluene, sodium dodecyl sulfate,
triton X-100, etc) or a combination the above techniques in the preparation of MNs suspensions
lead to ideal MN-dispersion levels, which are unfortunately unattainable through direct
introduction of MN into natural waters. Accordingly, it is quite difficult to extrapolate such
laboratory results to natural systems.
To address this gap in current knowledge on the environmental implications of
nanotechnologies, this study was designed to investigate the potential impacts of selected MNs
that previously showed toxicity effects (i.e. C60, nano-copper and nano-silver), when suspended
directly in natural waters. The rationale for this study is that MNs released directly to waterways
would likely be impacted primarily by solution composition and weak mechanical dispersion
processes such as waves and bioturbation. The type and extent of the biological effects of MNs
under these specific conditions could therefore be different from those currently reported in the
literature.
3.2 Materials and Methods
3.2.1 Collection of Water Samples
Water samples used in this study were collected from the Suwannee River (Fig. 3-1),
which provides an excellent opportunity to study the effect of water chemistry on potential
toxicity of MNs. The Suwannee River system contains three linked hydrologic units (upper,
middle and estuary), each providing distinct hydrological characteristics and gradients in
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and ionic strength (I). In the upper watershed, confinement of
the Floridan aquifer provides surface drainage and sources of organic carbon from wetlands (e.g.
the Okefenokee swamp in southern Georgia, Fig. 3-1). The boundary between the upper confined
and middle unconfined watershed is a geomorphic feature called the Cody Scarp, below which
57
ground water returns to the surface from many large springs, increasing the ionic strength of
surface waters. Finally, the river delta leads to the Gulf of Mexico, and provides sites for
collection of water samples with lower DOC and higher salinity.
Three samples were collected from (i) the headwaters or SR1, (ii) river mid-section or
SR2, and (iii) the river delta or SR3 (Figure 3-1) in DI-prewashed and site-water rinsed 2 liter
PE-containers. Soon after collection, the samples were placed in coolers and transported back to
UF campus. In the laboratory, samples were filtered (0.45 μm) to remove large size debris and
kept refrigerated at 4°C until used in laboratory experiments.
3.2.2 Preparation of Nanomaterial Suspensions in Collected Water Samples
Suspensions of pre-selected three MNs (C60, nano-Ag, and nano-Cu) were prepared in
volumetric flasks by mixing 200 mg of each of the MNs in 200ml of water. In addition,
Nanopure® water was also used as matrix to the tested MNs. Obtained mixtures were gently
agitated using a New Brunswick G24 horizontal shaker (Edison, NJ) to mimic the mechanical
mixing effect of waves. Following a 7-day of gentle mixing period, MNs were filtered to remove
agglomerated particles with size > 1.6 μm (1.6 μm Whattman filter paper, Florham Park, NJ),
and the filtrate collected for determination of MNs concentrations and use in toxicity
experiments.
3.2.3 Determination of MNs Concentrations in Prepared Suspensions
The concentration of C60 in the filtrates was determined by measuring the absorbance at
336 nm using a Hach DR/4000U spectrophotometer, and then correlating to standard solution of
known concentration prepared in tetrahydrofurane (THF) (Lyon et al. 2006). Following the acid
digestion of water MN-suspensions by a mixture of concentrated nitric and hydrofluoric acids,
concentrations of Cu and Ag in aqueous MN-suspensions were determined in comparison with
58
non-spiked natural water samples by inductively coupled plasma, atomic emission spectroscopy
(ICP-AES).
3.2.4 Toxicity of MNs Suspended in Natural Waters
Two toxicity tests, the 48-hr Ceriodaphnia dubia assay and MetPlateTM were used in this
study. The concentration ranges of tested MNs are given in Appendix B, and a brief description
of used toxicity tests is given below.
3.2.4.1 The Ceriodaphnia dubia assay
Moderately hard water (MHW) (USEPA 2002) was used as culture media for C. dubia.
Pure culture of C. dubia were obtained from Hydrosphere Research (Alachua, FL) and kept in
1L beakers containing 500mL of MHW in a PervicalTM model # E-30 BX environmental
chamber at 25 ºC with constant aeration. The photo period was 16 hr light/8 hr dark. C. dubia
was fed with concentrated P. subcapitata solution and a mixture made from yeast, cereal leaves
and trout chow (YCT). The daphnia were fed every other day through the addition of 6.67mL of
YCT and 6.67mL algal suspension per liter daphnia culture. Neonates of less than 24 hours were
separated from adults daily and used for testing.
Acute toxicity tests were performed according to EPA’s protocol (USEPA 2002), in which
MHW serves as diluent and as negative control. MNs tested for toxicity were added to the
culture as natural water suspensions to produce an increasing concentration gradient. Neonates
less than 24 hours were separated from adults and fed 2 hours prior to test start. Groups of five
neonates were then transferred into 30 ml plastic cups containing 20 ml of MN-suspensions.
There was no feeding during the tests and survival was determined visually after 48 hours. The
measured toxicity endpoint was death and/or immobilization, and for each tested MN, at least
five concentrations were used for LC50 determination (i.e. concentration resulting to the
death/immobilization of 50% of the population). All experiments were run in triplicates, and the
59
95% confidence intervals (CIs) associated with obtained LC50 values were calculated by the
probit analysis (U. S. EPA Probit Analysis Program, Ver. 1.5), and considered different when not
overlapping.
3.2.4.2 MetPLATE test
The MetPLATE test kit specific to heavy metal toxicity (Bitton et al. 1994) was also used
in this study. This kit contains a bacterial reagent (an E.coli strain), buffer, chlorophenol red
galactopyranoside (CPRG), which serves as substrate for β-galactosidase, and moderately hard
water (MHW) as a diluent (Bitton et al. 1994). The kit also includes a positive control (Cu).
Briefly, the bacterial reagent was rehydrated with 5-ml of diluent and thoroughly mixed by
vortexing. Next, 900 μl aliquot of the MN-suspensions prepared in natural waters was added to a
test tube containing 100 μl of the above-described bacterial reagent. In these assays, MHW
containing natural waters without MNs served as negative controls. The test tubes were vortexed
and then incubated for 1.5 hours at 35 ºC. A 200-μl aliquot of the above mixture was then
transferred to a 96-well microplate to which 100 μl of CPRG, the enzyme substrate, was added.
The microplates were then shaken and incubated at 35 ºC for color development. The response
was quantified at 570 nm using a Multiskan microplate reader. The measured toxicity endpoint
was inhibition of color development, and the IC50 (i.e. concentration that inhibits 50% of color
development) was determined by first plotting sample concentrations (X-axis) versus the percent
inhibition (%I) determined using Eq. 3-1 (Y-axis), and then performing a regression analysis in
the linear portion of the obtained line, from which the IC50 was determined using Eq. 3-2.
1001 ×⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−=
control
sampleA
A% I (3-1)
SY
IC erceptint50
50 −= (3-2)
60
Where A is the absorbance; Yintercept is the inhibition value corresponding to the intercept of
the above regression line with the Y-axis; and S is the slope of the linear regression. All samples
were run in triplicates.
3.3 Results and Discussion
3.3.1 Characterization of Water Samples
The chemical composition of the three water samples is presented in Table 3-1. Sample
SR1 was characterized by a very high DOC content (47.71 mg C/L) and low ionic strength (0.94
mM). The second sample (SR2) had an ionic strength of 3.34 mM and a DOC content of 10.18
mg C/L. The sample collected along the salinity gradient in the river delta had a much higher
ionic strength (475.17 mM). Although the DOC concentration of SR3 samples could not be
determined in our laboratory due to the high chloride concentration of the samples, the reported
DOC in this portion of the Suwannee River was about 2.3 mg C/L (Del Castillo et al. 2000).
Overall, the ionic strength of these water samples shows a steep gradient indicative of the
downstream in increasing concentration of inorganic carbon, primarily bicarbonate. Other major
ions do not vary significantly between SR1 and SR2. Finally, in all three samples the original
concentrations of total-Ag and total-Cu were below the detection limits (<10 μg/L) of the ICP-
AES used in this study.
3.3.2 Total Concentration of Dispersed Nanomaterials
The concentrations of C60 and nanometals in collected filtrates were analyzed by
spectrophotometry and ICP-AES respectively (Fig 3-2), representing the fractions of suspended
nanoparticles passing through a 1.6 μm filter. Measured concentration varied significantly with
the water chemical composition. All nanomaterials were rather well-dispersed in SR1 with
concentrations ranging from ~ 0.54 mg/L to ~12.58 mg/L. The lowest concentrations were
61
obtained in SR3 (from 0.04 ± 0.02 mg/L to 0.66 ± 0.23 mg/L). Suspension of the same
nanomaterials in Nanopure water yielded final concetrations ranging from ~ 0.13 mg/L to ~1.67
mg/L after filtration.
The highest Ag concentration was observed in Nanopure-water suspensions followed by
SR1 and SR3, but no statistically significant difference between values measured in SR1 and
SR3 samples was found. Measured Ag levels in SR2 samples were negligible. Nano-silver has
previously been found to be partially oxidized when exposed to oxygen and Ag+ will form on the
particle’s surface (Lok et al. 2007). The positive charges can probably keep some silver
nanoparticles from forming large aggregates and thus go through the filter membrane. Fan and
Bard (2002) demonstrated that oxidized silver films could be solubilized as Ag (I) and Ag (0)
species. This may account for the larger fraction of suspended or dissolved Ag in DI water as
opposed to other waters (Fig. 3-2). Soluble Ag is known to have a high affinity with organic
matter (logK of 7.5, Bury et al. 2002; 9.0-9.2, Janes and Playle 1995) and chloride (logKAgCl of
9.8, Lide and Frederikse 1997). This is probably also true for the Ag nanoparticles. They can be
stabilized by natural ligands and polymers in water (Mayer et al. 1999; Mucalo et al. 2002;
Pastoriza-Santos and Liz-Marzán 2002; Zhou et al. 2006). Accordingly, steric stabilization effect
from the organic ligand layers coating the nanoparticles can help prevent particle aggregation.
Therefore, in SR2, removal of Ag is most likely due to low DOC levels. These results suggest
that organic matter and solution chemical composition can influence the suspension of nano-
silver particles in water, although the quantitative relationships remain unknown.
In contrast to nano-Ag, Nanopure water had lowest Cu-level while most Cu nanoparticles
were dispersed in SR1 water. Similar to nano-Ag, soluble Cu tends to form very stable
complexes with natural organic ligands, e.g. log K'Cu(II)L varies from 10 to 14 (Leal and Van den
62
Berg 1998; Pastoriza-Santos and Liz-Marzán 2002; Xie et al. 2004). The detected total-Cu
concentration showed a positive correlation with DOC concentrations (Fig. 3-3), indicating
strong binding effects of NOM on nano-copper particles. This trend is in agreement with
previously published work (Cantwell and Burgess 2001; Wen et al. 1999).
Although it is well accepted that C60 has a very low solubility in water (Heymann 1996;
Ruoff et al. 1993), an approximate 3.09 ppm of C60 nanoparticles was suspended in SR2. This is
probably because C60 particles could be negatively charged (ξ up to -40 mV) in aqueous systems
(Brant et al. 2005; Deguchi et al. 2001). However, when in contact with even weak electrolyte
solutions, suspensions of C60 would tend to become destabilized and agglomerate due to surface
complexation with cations (Brant et al. 2005), a potential explanation for lower solubility of C60
in SR3 samples. Like nanometals, it has also been previously shown that carbon nanomaterials
can be stabilized by organic matter or natural polymers (Chen and Elimelech 2007; Espinasse et
al. 2007; Hyung et al. 2007). Deguchi (2007) has demonstrated the stabilization of C60 by human
serum albumin and showed that dispersion stability of C60 nanoparticles in complex
environments could be different from simple model systems (Deguchi et al. 2007) common to
the majority of current experimental studies. Espinasse et al. (2007) stated that humic and fulvic
acids could enhance the stability of colloidal nC60 by increasing the negative charge on the
surface. However, if true, the higher concentration of C60 measured in SR2 as compared to SR1
cannot be easily explained. It is therefore proposed that acidity in SR1 (pH = 4.7) leads to the
interaction of H+ with negatively charged C60 surfaces, resulting in net surface charges that favor
aggregation.
63
3.3.3 Evaluation of Acute Toxicity of Nanomaterials Suspended in Natural Waters to Ceriodaphnia dubia
As particle-feeding organisms, C. dubia were chosen as model test organisms because of
their high sensitivity to toxic fine particles. Although no toxicity to C. dubia was detected
through exposure to C60 suspensions with concentration up to 10% of the original suspension,
water samples containing nano-silver and nano-copper were found to be toxic, as reflected by the
LC50 data shown in Fig 3-4. The highest toxicity was observed on organisms exposed to
nanopure-water suspended nanometals, with a LC50 of 0.462 μg/L for Ag (95% CI = 0.449 –
0.473 μg/L) and 2.14 μg/L for Cu (95% CI = 1.97 – 2.33 μg/L). With regard to Ag, SR1 had a
LC50 of 6.18 μg/L (95% CI = 5.52-6.66 μg/L), 0.771 μg/L (95% CI = 0.74546-0.798 μg/L) for
SR2, and 0.696 μg/L (95% CI = 6.56-0.730 μg/L) for SR3. The LC50 values for Cu in SR1 and
SR2 had trends similar to that of Ag and with LC50 of 46 μg/L for nano-Cu suspended in SR1
water (95% CI = 43-52 μg/L) and 7.12 μg/L (95% CI = 6.93-7.30 μg/L) in SR2 water. Unlike
Ag, nano-copper in SR3 was less toxic with a LC50 value of 48 μg/L (95% CI = 41-74 μg/L).
The toxicity of soluble Ag species has been well studied (Lee et al. 2005; Morgan et al.
2005; VanGenderen et al. 2003). Free Ag ions are typically very toxic to freshwater organisms
(Bury et al. 1999), but Ag complexed with dissolved organic compounds has much lower
toxicity (Hogstrand and Wood 1998; Rodgers et al. 1997). Therefore, this could explain the
lower toxicity of Ag-SR1 suspensions (i.e. higher LC50 to Daphnia). In SR3 samples, although
chloride will also form complexes with silver, AgCl0 colloids can still diffuse across biological
membranes, enhancing bioavailability and toxicity of Ag (Erickson et al. 1998; Glover and
Wood 2005; Hogstrand and Wood 1998). Interestingly, Ag-SR2 suspension was almost as toxic
as Ag-DI suspension; and this despite its much smaller Ag content. This could suggest that Ag+
was likely the dominant form after suspension of nano-silver SR2 water.
64
Cu can bind to the fish gills, inhibit ion transport, and cause disturbance of multiple
physiological processes (Grosell et al. 2007; Schwartz et al. 2004). Organic matter can not only
facilitate dissolution and dispersion of copper nanoparticles, but decrease the toxicity of copper
as well (Kim et al. 1999; Richards et al. 2001; Schwartz et al. 2004; Vasconcelos et al. 1997).
Similar to other results (Kramer et al. 2004; Perez et al. 2006; Ryan et al. 2004), our data also
demonstrated that toxicity to C. daphnia is linearly correlated to DOC (Fig 3-5). However, the
calculated slope is smaller than the above studies by approximately one or two orders of
magnitude, indicating much higher toxicity associated with nano-copper particles. For SR3,
increased water hardness and alkalinity could also reduce Cu toxicity owing to the competition
between Cu and other cations for binding sites or carbonate complexation (Erickson et al. 1996;
Hyne et al. 2005; Sciera et al. 2004).
In a separate study, we tested the toxicity of C60 water suspensions prepared by the
Deguchi’s method (Deguchi et al. 2001), which uses THF to transfer C60 to water (Kopelevich et
al. 2008). The LC50 for C. dubia exposed to such C60-suspensions was 0.395 mg/L (95% C. I. =
0.287-0.470 mg/L). Other researchers (e.g. Zhu et al. 2006) also compared the toxicity of THF-
produced C60 suspensions to that of C60 directly suspended in DI-water. They showed a much
poorer suspension in DI-water, resulting in lower C60 toxicity. In Zhu’s study, the LC50 for THF-
nC60 to Daphnia magna was about 0.8 ppm while water-stirred-nC60 didn’t cause 50% mortality
at concentrations up to 35 ppm (Zhu et al. 2006). It has been suggested that the residual THF is
responsible for the observed higher toxicity, but others argued that differences in surface
chemistry and/or morphology play a more important role in the observed toxicity responses
(Brant et al. 2005; Lyon et al. 2006). However, results from this study suggest that C60
nanoparticles could be less toxic if released directly to natural waters, although the potential exist
65
for long-term in-situ transformation of C60 to more reactive/toxic forms. Also, the effect on C.
dubia may not be representative of the response of most aquatic organisms.
3.3.4 Acute Toxicity with MetPLATE
Toxicity observed with MetPLATE would indicate the presence of bioavailable forms of
the metal (Bitton et al. 1994). No toxicity was detected with C60 samples, Ag-SR1, Ag-SR2, and
Cu-DI suspensions (Fig. 3-6). The EC50 values for SR3 and DI-water nano-Ag containing
suspensions were 112 ± 0.94 μg/L and 48 ± 6 μg/L, respectively.
Similar to the well known strong antimicrobial effects of silver (Ki et al. 2007; Sondi and
Salopek-Sondi 2004; Yoshida et al. 1999), recent investigations have also demonstrated the
antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles (Jain and Pradeep 2005; Lok et al. 2006; Yu 2007).
Besides the formation of Ag+ on the surface of nano-silver surface (Lok et al. 2007), the toxicity
mechanism is also related to the fact that silver nanoparticles can penetrate the cell membrane
and lead to bacteria death through reactions with the cell metabolic processes (Lok et al. 2006;
Sondi and Salopek-Sondi 2004). Our results showed that NOM coating in SR1 samples reduces
the availability of free Ag ions in the solution, while the toxicity of nano-Ag-SR3 and nano-Ag-
DI-water suspensions indicated presence of bioavailable Ag species (Bitton et al. 1994).
According to the literature, the bioavailable form of silver chloride could be AgCl0
(Hogstrand and Wood 1998). MetPLATE results for nano-Ag-DI-water suspension have
somewhat proved our speculations about Ag concentration in water, i. e., Ag+ was formed on the
surface by oxidation.
No toxicity was detected with Cu-DI, implying little formation of bioavailable copper
without organic matter and other ions. Therefore, the high toxicity of the same sample to C.
dubia is probably caused by Cu nanoparticles or nano-aggregates owing to the particle-feeding
66
behavior of the cladocerans. Contrary to silver, Cu-NOM complexes could still be bioavailable
to bacteria, and are thus more toxic (Apte et al. 2005). This is consistent with our Cu-SR1
MetPLATE toxicity result.
3.4 Conclusions
In conclusion, dispersion of nanoparticles in aqueous systems varies significantly in
different aqueous systems. The suspended concentrations of nanomaterials are mainly dependent
on the chemical properties of the particles and water characteristics. However, the aquatic
toxicity was not linearly correlated with the suspended content of MNs. As revealed by C. dubia
and MetPLATE tests, toxicity was not the result of bio-availabity solely; instead, it could be
largely affected by the metabolism and feeding behavior of the aquatic organisms. Our results
are of great significance in the context of understanding the fate, transformation and biological
effects of nanomaterials in the aqueous environments. Although some of the findings are
consistent with previous observed trends in manipulated nano-water systems, much still remains
to be answered and further investigated.
67
Figure 3-1. Map of the Suwannee River watershed and tributaries showing the three sampling locations. SR1-samples were collected near the Florida-Georgia border, SR2-samples were obtained from the river mid-section, and SR3 samples were collected along the salinity gradient in the river estuary.
68
Ag
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
SR1 SR2 SR3 DI
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L
)
0.54
0.043
0.66
1.67
Cu
0
5
10
15
20
25
SR1 SR2 SR3 DI
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L
)
12.58
1.45 0.51 0.134
C60
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
SR1 SR2 SR3 DI
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
g/L
)
1.62
3.09
0.038
0.83
Figure 3-2. Concentrations of (A) silver, (B) copper, and (C) C60 in different water samples spiked with individual nanomaterial and then filtered. Numbers above bars are average concentrations of two samples and vertical lines represent ± 1 standard deviation of the mean.
69
SR1
SR2DI
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 10 20 30 40 50
DOC concentration (mg/L)
Cu
conc
entr
atio
n (m
g/L
)
Figure 3-3. Linear correlation of Cu concentrations and dissolved organic matter (DOC) in water samples SR1, SR2 and DI water (R2=0.9864).
70
Ag
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SR1 SR2 SR3 DI
LC
50 (u
g/L
)6.18
(5.52-6.66)
0.77(0.745-0.798)
0.70(0.656-0.73)
0.462(0.449-0.473)
Cu
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
SR1 SR2 SR3 DI
LC
50 (u
g/L
)
46(43-52)
7.12(6.93-7.3)
48(41-74)
2(1.97-2.33)
Figure 3-4. 48-h LC50 values of (A) silver- and (B) copper-spiked water samples to Ceriodaphnia dubia. Numbers above the bars are the estimated LC50 values and the 95% confidence interval in parentheses determined by probit analysis.
71
SR1
SR2DI
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 10 20 30 40 50
DOC concentration (mg/L)
LC
50 o
f Cu
(ug/
L)
Figure 3-5. Relationship between the 48-h LC50 values of nanocopper suspensions to
Ceriodaphnia dubia and dissolved organic matter (DOC) concentrations in SR1, SR2, and DI water.
72
Ag
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
SR1 SR2 SR3 DI
IC50
(ug/
L)
NA
112.14
NA
47.79
Cu
0
50
100
150
200
250
SR1 SR2 SR3 DI
IC50
(ug/
L)
NA
204
46.0830.91
Figure 3-6. IC50 values of (A) nanosilver- and (B) nanocopper suspensions using MetPLATE
test. Numbers above the bars are the estimated IC50 values and vertical lines represent the ± 1 standard deviation of the mean.
73
Table 3-1. Characteristics of water samples prior to contact with C60, Ag and Cu nanoparticles Dispersion
water Sample
type pH Alkalinity (mg/L as CaCO3)
Ionic Strength (I) (mM)
DOC (mg/L)
Ag (μg/L)
Cu (μg/L)
SR 1 Freshwater 4.70 6 0.94 45.71 <10 <10 SR 2 Freshwater 7.15 88 3.34 10.18 <10 <10 SR 3 Seawater 7.56 132 475.17 N/A* <10 <10
Note*: DOC concentration of SR3 is not available due to the high salinity. The reported DOC in this portion of the Suwannee river was about 2.3 mg C/L (Del Castillo et al. 2000).
74
CHAPTER 4 MOBILITY OF SINGLE-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES (SWNTS) IN SATURATED
HETEROGENEOUS POROUS MEDIA
4.1 Introduction
Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) have attracted the attention of both engineers
and scientists since their discovery in 1993 (Iijima and Ichihashi 1993). The unique size-related
characteristics of SWNTs, such as strength, elasticity, high adsorption capacity, and controllable
conductivity, have led to their use in a growing number of industrial processes as well as to their
introduction into a wide variety of commercial product (Isobe et al. 2006; Jia et al. 2005; Lyon et
al. 2005; Templeton et al. 2006). It has been estimated that 65 tons of nanotubes and fibers were
produced worldwide in 2004, resulting in revenue predictions that would exceed $4.5 billion by
2010, based on an annual growth rate of ~60% (Cientifica 2005). On the other hand, this
dramatic increase in production rates of SWNTs and their anticipated uses in a wide variety of
commercial and industrial applications suggest that they will inevitably enter the environment
and potentially impact the biosphere. Therefore, while the applications of SWNTs are exciting,
there is concern over potential environmental and human health problems.
Besides toxicity issues common to nanosized materials, the environmental and human
health implications of SWNTs seem to be complicated by the presence of impurities, such as
metal catalyst contaminants, which have been so far impossible to remove entirely without
destroying the sp2 structure of SWNTs. Additionally, the above listed potential applications of
SWNTs have motivated research on the production of highly dispersed suspensions
(Matarredona et al. 2003), and SWNTs are now routinely dispersed in a wide variety of
surfactants including sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate
(NaDDBS), to preserve their inherent properties (Wang et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 2005). However,
75
some of the surfactants with efficient SWNT dispersion abilities are potentially toxic to living
organisms (see Chapter 2).
Overall, the above observations suggest that the toxic effects of SWNTs could be related to
several parameters including metal impurities (Lanone and Boczkowski 2006; Miyawaki et al.
2008; Shvedova et al. 2003), the degree and kind of aggregation in produced SWNTs (Tian et al.
2006; Wick et al. 2007), the nanosize and shape of SWNTs, the type of solvent and surfactant
used in the preparation processes, or the combination of two or more of the above parameters.
Currently, research on the implications of SWNTs has been devoted largely to toxicity
issues while the investigation of their fate and transport in both aquatic and terrestrial systems
remains limited. Changes in nanoparticle surface chemistry in combination with shifts in key
environmental parameters such as levels and type of organic matter, pH, and ionic strength could
affect the mobility of nanomaterials, and therefore, their environmental fate and transport
(Espinasse et al. 2007; Kanel et al. 2007; Lecoanet et al. 2004; Lecoanet and Wiesner 2004;
Schrick et al. 2004). For example, Schrick et al. (2004) found that negative surface charge could
prevent the aggregation of zerovalent iron nanoparticles by electrostatic repulsion of similarly
charged particles. Implicitly, the lack of aggregation would then favor the transport of nanosized
particles through porous media. Currently published research on transport of nanomaterials in
porous media are so far limited to qualitative descriptions of transport behavior (Heller et al.
2004; Lecoanet et al. 2004), and modeling studies focusing on transport of nanotubes in
heterogeneous porous media are still lacking.
In this study, we investigated the mobility of SWNTs suspended in either ionic (SDS) or
non-ionic (Gum Arabic) surfactants in natural sandy and clay soils using column experiments.
The ultimate objective of this study was to generate data that can be used to predict the ability of
76
SWNTs to move through heterogeneous porous media as a function of (i) soil characteristics and
(ii) the chemical composition of the solvent used to suspend SWNTs. For this work, transport
patterns of SWNT suspensions in soil columns were analyzed using a well-established
convection-dispersion equation (CDE), referred to herein as CDE-model. The CDE model was
selected because of its efficient ability to predict the transport of nanosize particles such as
viruses (20 – 200 nm) and colloids (<10μm) in soils (Chendorain et al. 1998; Close et al. 2006;
Jin et al. 2000; Vidales-Contreras et al. 2006).
4.2 Materials and Methods
4.2.1 Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Sample Preparation
SWNTs were obtained from Rice University (Rice HPR 145.1). SWNT suspensions were
prepared by suspending an initial mass of about 40 mg of SWNTs into 200 ml of either an
aqueous Gum Arabic (GA) or Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) surfactant solution (1% w/v). GA
and SDS used in this study were obtained from Aldrich-Sigma. To obtain highly dispersed
SWNT suspension, mixtures of SWNTs were first homogenized using a high-shear IKA T-25
Ultra-Turrax mixer for about 60 to 90 minutes followed by a 10-min ultra-sonication with a
Misonix S3000. Next, the mixture was centrifuged at 20,000 rpm (Beckman Coulter Optima L-
80 K) for 2.5 h. The supernatant was then carefully separated from the aggregated nanotubes
collected at the bottom of the tube. In parallel, an aqueous suspension of SWNT without
surfactant was prepared by direct mixing of SWNT and Nanopure® water followed by a 15-
minute sonication period. For all of these produced suspensions, visible absorbance spectra of
SWNTs were recorded by using a Nano-Fluorescence Nanospectrolyzer (Applied
NanoFluorescence, LLC), and the concentrations of SWNTs suspensions determined by
absorbance at 763 nm.
77
4.2.2 Soil Sample Collection and Characterization
Two types of soils were collected from the McCarty Woods on the University of Florida
campus (sandy soil) and from a construction site near Atlanta, Georgia (Georgia clay soil). After
removing the top 2 to 3 cm, soil samples were collected from the top 1 to 2 feet. The
physicochemical characteristics of these soils have been reported previously (Feng et al. 2007),
and are summarized here in Table 4-1. The soil pH was measured according to the U.S. EPA
method 9045D (USEPA 2004). Particle size distribution was determined according to the USDA
Soil Survey Lab Method (USDA 1992). The Walkley & Black Method (Walkley and Black
1934) was used to measure the soil organic carbon content. Soil organic matter was calculated by
multiplying the soil organic carbon content by a coefficient of 1.72 (Nelson and Sommers 1996).
Prior to use in column experiments, collected soils were first air-dried, sieved (1.19mm) to
remove gross debris and then homogenized.
4.2.3 Column Experiments
Columns used in this study were 30 cm long clear plexiglass tubes with ~4 cm internal
diameter (see Figure 4-1). The bottom of the columns were sealed with glass wool and secured
with a non transparent PVC ring equipped with an opening to allow the leachate through.
For sandy soil experiments, each column was filled with 300 g of soil from the top. The pore
volume of each of packed column was measured by gravimetry and averaged 93.5 ml. The
porosity was determined to be 0.37. Prior to the introduction of a conservative tracer solution,
bromide (Br-) in this case, and SWNTs suspension into the columns, packed soils were first
saturated with nanopure® water (>18 MΩ cm, Barnstead Corp) to enhance packing
homogeneity and help clean the effluent from loose soil fine particles. Next, 50 ml of Br-
solution, and 50 ml of SWNT-GA, SWNT-SDS or sonicated SWNTs suspension were added to
each column from the top, followed by continuous addition of DI water. Effluent samples were
78
collected at discrete intervals and analyzed for Br- and SWNT concentrations. In case of clay
soil, a similar procedure was used, except that 150 g of soil were packed into the column and 25
ml of Br- solution, and 25 ml of SWNT-GA or SWNT-SDS suspensions were used. The pore
volume for the clay soil column was determined to be 76.625 ml and a calculated porosity of
0.41. On collected leachates, the concentrations of SWNTs were determined as described earlier
using the Applied NanoFluorescence Nanospectrolyzer. Bromide concentrations were measured
using Ion Chromatography (Dionex Model DX-320 IC system). All experiments were conducted
in duplicates.
4.2.4 Modeling
As stated earlier, a CDE model of solute transport in soils was selected and used in this
study to simulate SWNT transport through the soil columns. The CDE model can simulate
quantitatively the retention and transport of solutes in soils and reveal the effect of soil
characteristics on solute fate and transport (Chen et al. 2006). The one-dimensional governing
equation for this model can be written as follows (Parker and Vangenuchten 1984):
cxcv
xcD
tcR μ−
∂∂
−∂∂
=∂∂
2
2
(4-1)
where c is the solute concentration in mg/L, t is the time (min), R is the retardation factor, D is
the hydrodynamic dispersion coefficient (cm2 min-1), x is the distance (cm), v is the pore-water
velocity (cm min-1), and μ the removal rate coefficient (min-1). For linear instantaneous sorption,
the above retardation factor R is defined as:
θ
ρ dbKR +=1 (4-2)
79
where ρb is the bulk density of sandy soils (dry weight) (g cm-3), θ is the volumetric water
content (cm3 cm-3), and Kd is the equilibrium sorption distribution coefficient between the liquid
and the sorbed phases (cm3 g-1). The value of R is evidently equal to or greater than 1.
The nonlinear least-square curve-fitting program CXTFIT 2.1, was used to estimate
transport parameters with experimentally collected breakthrough curve (BTC) data (Toride et al.
1999). The bromide data were analyzed by setting the removal rate (μ) as zero and the
retardation factor (R) as 1.
4.3 Results and Discussion
4.3.1 Bromide Transport and Breakthrough Curves in Sandy and Clay soils
Breakthrough curves (BTCs) observed and simulated with the CDE model for the
conservative tracer (i.e. Br-) through sandy soil and clay soil columns are presented in Figure 4-
2. Table 4-2 lists the parameters used in the model simulations. As a conservative tracer, Br- is
assumed to have no retardation (R = 1) or reaction (μ = 0) within the soil columns, and based on
experimentally measured pore water velocities, v, and the dispersion coefficients, D, determined
by the model as a fitting parameter, the output of model simulations matched the experimental
data of Br- transport very well (with correlation coefficients (r2) equal to 0.98 and 0.85 for sandy
soils and clay soils, respectively – see Figure 4-2).
4.3.2 SWNTs Transport in Sandy Soils
Figure 4-3 shows the BTC of experimental data and simulated data of SWNT suspended in
GA and SDS through sandy soil columns. For CDE model, the pore water velocity was measured
experimentally. Dispersion on the other hand is mainly determined by the characteristics of the
porous media. It is therefore acceptable to assume the dispersion coefficient to be constant for
different solutes traveling through the same packed soil. Accordingly, the dispersion coefficient
80
of SWNT was assumed to be similar to that of Br-, and the reaction rate μ and retardation
coefficient R were then determined by model simulations (Table 4-2).
Although studies focusing on fate and transport of most nanomaterials in heterogeneous
porous media are either lacking or preliminary, extensive investigations have been carried out on
transport and retention of virus particles in soil media (Bales et al. 1991; Bales et al. 1993; Bitton
et al. 1979; Bitton et al. 1984; Funderburg et al. 1981; Han et al. 2006; Jin and Yates 2002; Jin et
al. 1997). Given the nanosize of these biotic particles, results on viruses can be used for
comparison purposes. For instance, one of the major factors controlling the transport of viruses
in soil columns is adsorption (Bitton et al. 1979). Under saturated soil conditions, viruses may
reach equilibrium and/or undergo kinetic adsorption on soil particles (Schijven and Hassanizadeh
2000). The CDE model, which has been successfully used to predict the transport behavior of
viruses and colloids in soils, seems to work quite well in simulating SWNTs transport in porous
media, with correlation coefficients (r2) of 0.96 and 0.86 for SWNT-GA and SWNT-SDS,
respectively. However, observed SWNT BTCs tend to have longer tails compared to Br- BTC
(Figure 4-3), indicating the likely occurrence of kinetic adsorption of SWNT on tested sandy
soils (Schijven and Hassanizadeh 2000). R-values close to 1 were observed in both SWNTs-GA
and SWNTs-SDS leaching experiments, reflecting minimal equilibrium adsorption and
retardation of SWNTs by sandy soils at tested flow rates. The quality of the model fitting is
obviously affected by the number of data points as SWNT-GA yielded twice more data points
than SWNT-SDS, resulting in a better fit.
While SWNTs were detected in effluents collected from columns spiked with SWNT-GA
and SWNT-SDS suspensions, no SWNT was detected in the first 2 L effluent collected from
sonicated aqueous SWNT suspensions. These results indicate that surfactants do facilitate the
81
transport of SWNTs in the soils. This is mainly due to ability of surfactants to reduce the
interfacial and surface tension of particles and increase the capacity of the mobile aqueous phase
by forming micelles (Chen et al. 2006). The mass balance was 37% and 47% for SWNT-GA and
SWNT-SDS, respectively. The mass recovery results suggested that more SWNT-GA was
retained in the soil column than SWNT-SDS. It is probably because SDS can provide negative
charges on the surface of SWNT micelles and cause more electrostatic repulsion and less
attachment efficiency. Furthermore, the greater values of R and μ of SWNT-GA than SWNT-
SDS indicate stronger adsorption of SWNT-GA to the sandy soils as well.
In previous investigations involving other carbonaceous nanomaterials, Espinasse et al.
(2007) compared fullerene (C60) transport in the presence of tannic acid and polysaccharides and
suggested that the negatively charged tannic acid resulted in less attachment efficiency than
polysaccharide-like organic compounds. Several studies on transport of virus particles in soil
columns (Chattopadhyay et al. 2002; Cheng et al. 2007; Pieper et al. 1997; Wall et al. 2008;
Zhuang and Jin 2003) also observed increased transport using surfactants or natural organic
matters. Zhuang and Jin (2003) proposed that organic matter can provide negative charges or
cover positively charged sites, thus increasing the repulsion between virus and soil particles.
Wall et al. (2008) suggested it is due to organic matter occupying adsorption sites or physically
blocking pores. From these findings it can be concluded that surfactant modified surface charges
of the nanoparticles could influence the retention and transport in the sandy soils.
4.3.3 SWNTs Transport in Clay Soils
Regardless of the composition of the SWNT suspension used (i.e. GA, SDS), SWNTs did
not leach out of the clay soil columns after more than 10 pore volumes. This reveals that all
SWNTs were strongly retained by clay particles, therefore delaying their downward motion. To
some extent, this is not surprising because previous studies on viruses noted that the sorption
82
capacity virus particles increased with increasing clay fractions in soils (Bitton 1975; Bitton et al.
1978; Chu et al. 2003; Juhna et al. 2003). In addition, impeded flow rates were observed as
compared to sandy soils. Also, this effect was particularly pronounced in clay soil columns
spiked with SWNT-SDS. However, as shown in sandy soil experiments, the flow rate of SWNT-
SDS treated columns were higher than those in SWNT-GA treated columns. This opposite trend
is probably due to pore size exclusion of the SWNT-GA nanoparticles (Schijven and
Hassanizadeh 2000).
Overall, it is obvious that the retention of SWNT in soil varies with soil characteristics, and
soils with high clay content could significantly adsorb/retain SWNTs, or at least significantly
delay their downward transport.
4.4 Conclusions
The observed trends of SWNTs mobility agree well with some other investigations on
nanoparticles and nano-sized microorganisms such as viruses. The surface properties of
nanomaterials are important in determining the transport of nanomaterials through porous media.
With the help of dispersing surfactant, SWNTs moved rapidly in a typical Florida sandy soil,
raising concerns that surfactant-dispersed SWNTs could rather easily travel through such soils
and reach the groundwater in case of accidental spill for example. In contrats, finer clay soil
particles could significantly impede the mobility of SWNT. In this latter case, however, the
reported toxicity effects of SWNT on microorganisms could raise concerns on the long-term
impact of such retained SWNT on soil microorganisms and associated ecosystem services.
Finally, this study also demonstrated that the CDE model could be used to predict the transport
behavior of SWNT suspension in sandy soils. This initial investigation opens the door for future
studies on transport of nanomaterials in porous media, and ideally, such studies should
investigate changes in physicochemical characteristics of MNs following transport through soil
83
columns, as well as the potential toxicity of eluted MNs and/or their derivatives. It appears that
under specific conditions, the transport behavior of SWNT can be modeled, and this effort could
be extended to other types of MNs to examine the physicochemical properties governing the fate
and transport of MNs in porous media.
84
Figure 4-1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for SWNTs transport in packed heterogeneous sandy or clay soils.
NM suspension and leaching
solution
Tested soil
PVC column
PVC ring
Collection container
85
Bromide
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Pore volume
C/C
0
Experiment dataSimulated data
Bromide
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Pore volume
C/C
0
Experimental dataSimulated data
Figure 4-2. Breakthrough curves of experimental and simulated data of bromide (Br-) in sandy (A) and clay (B) soils. Each point represents the average of two replicates and vertical bars are standard deviations.
(A)
(B)
86
SWNT in GA
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0 1 2 3 4 5
Pore volume
C/C
0
Experiment data
Simulated data
SWNT in SDS
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Pore volume
C/C
0
Experiment dataSimulated data
Figure 4-3. Breakthrough curves of experimental and simulated data of SWNT-GA and SWNT-SDS suspensions in sandy soil columns. Vertical bars are standard deviations of two replicates.
87
Table 4-1. Physicochemical characteristics of the sandy (Gainesville, Florida) and clayey (Atlanta, Georgia) soils used in column experiments (Feng et al. 2007).
Characteristic Sandy soil clay soil pH 5.7 5.7
% Organic carbon 0.5 0.6 % Organic matter 1.6 1.8
% Sand 96.92 56.4 % Silt 0.02 22.6
% Clay 3.06 21.0
88
Table 4-2. Transport parameters estimated by CXTFIT for bromide and SWNT in GA and SDS in sandy soils.
r2 v (cm min-1) R D (cm2 min-1) μ (min-1)
Bromide in sandy soils 0.98 7.77 1 13.03 0
SWNT-GA in sandy soils 0.96 6.34 1.28 - 0.34
SWNT-SDS in sandy soils 0.86 7.28 1.06 - 0.22
89
CHAPTER 5 POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIALS ON
BIOGEOCHEMICAL PROCESSES IN SEDIMENTS
5.1 Introduction
Ecosystems accomplish numerous natural services and most, if not all of them, seem to
have common main characteristics including the flow of energy, material and information, and
the participation of biota and water. Therefore, the ability to qualitatively and/or quantitatively
characterize any of the above listed natural processes can be used to assess the impact of
pollutants on ecosystem functions, and could be provided by thermodynamics, which has been
successfully applied in the description of the basic properties of ecosystems (e.g. flow of matter
and energy).
In sediments, the composition and distribution of microbial populations are usually well-
established, although changes associated with shifts in seasons and other major parameters are
also common. However, the input of pollutants can have significant impacts on the composition
of microbial communities and/or their activities in sediments. In such cases, potential
consequences could range from a simple delay in biodegradation of organic matter to major
environmental impacts such as the production of more toxic derivatives, with bioaccumulation
potential and negative effects on ecosystem functions.
By combining the flow of material and energy to microbial activity, a series of reactions
involved cycling of organic carbon in sediments can be used as proxy to detect potential impact
of manufactured nanomaterials (MNs) on basic ecosystem functions. This is because the
anticipated widespread production and use of MNs could lead to new environmental pollutants
(Masciangioli and Zhang 2003), which could either directly impact living cells, or undergo
environmental transformations to produce secondary toxic derivatives.
90
In contrast to overwhelming literature on MNs production and application (e.g.,
Borderieux et al. 2004; Davis 1997; Eng 2004; Florence et al. 1995; Jensen et al. 1996; Li et al.
2006; Pitoniak et al. 2003; Tungittiplakorn et al. 2004; Wang and Zhang 1997; Zajtchuk 1999
Kotelnikova et al., 2003), and growing focus on toxicity response of test model organisms and
human cells to MNs exposure, only limited number of studies have investigated the fate,
transport and the resulting impacts of MNs at the system level (Hyung et al. 2007; Lecoanet et al.
2004; Lecoanet and Wiesner 2004). They showed that MNs could exhibit different transport
behaviors in porous media or become stabilized in organic rich waters with potential for long-
range transport. Relevant to this study are findings that C60 could be toxic to soil microbial
species (Fortner et al. 2005), depending on the composition of culture medium and C60
speciation. Also, CdSe quantum dots are believed to be cytotoxic due to the release of Cd2+ ions
(Derfus et al. 2004; Lanone and Boczkowski 2006; Zhang et al. 2006) and/or through direct
interaction of the quantum dots with cells (Kirchner et al. 2005; Liang et al. 2007). Likewise, the
reported antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles can become a “double-edged sword” owing
to the extremely high toxicity of Ag+ that forms on Ag-nanoparticle surfaces (Lok et al. 2007;
Lok et al. 2006; Yu 2007). Preliminary studies conducted in our laboratory based on kinetics of
acetate biodegradation showed that the addition of C60 to sediment slurries negatively impacted
rates of acetate oxidation (Kopelevich et al. 2008). In contrast, Tong et al. (2007) and Nyberg et
al. (2008) did not detect negative responses by soil microbial communities by monitoring gas
production (i.e. CO2 and CH4) in C60 spiked soils.
Overall, the above observations tend to point to the possibility of certain MNs to act as
bactericides, and therefore, to negatively impact soil and sediment microorganisms. Therefore, in
this study, the effects of aqueous suspensions of C60, CdSe-quantum dots and nano-silver on the
91
sediment microorganisms were investigated. Sediment slurries were manipulated to favor certain
terminal electron acceptors (nitrate and sulfate) and the effect of tested MNs assessed.
5.2 Materials and Methods
5.2.1 Preparation of Nanomaterial Suspensions
The preparation method for nC60 suspensions was adapted from Deguchi et al. (2001).
Briefly, ~15 mg of C60 (99.5%, Term-USA) were added to 500 ml of THF, bubbled with ultra-
high purity (UHP) nitrogen for 1 hour to remove oxygen, and then sealed and left stirring at
room temperature for 24 hours. Excess solids were later filtered out using a 0.45 μm PTFE
membrane filter, resulting in a transparent pink solution. The filtrate was then added to equal
amount of water and placed in a water bath prior to purging with UHP-N2 to evaoparte THF.
Following the THF evaporation, the obtained solution was vacuum-filtered through 0.45 μm
cellulose into a flask and stored in the dark. A suspension of nano-silver (Quantum Sphere, Inc.)
at 200 mg/L was prepared in nanopure water by simple shaking at room temperature for 48
hours. CdSe quantum dot suspensions were purchased from NN-Labs, LLC (Fayetteville, AR).
5.2.2 Sediment Collection
Sediments used in this study were collected from a polluted lake (Lake Alice) located on
University of Florida campus in Gainesville, Florida. Surface sediments (top 10 cm) were
collected using pre-cleaned high density polyethylene scoops, transferred into sieves (2 mm), and
the sieved fraction was stored in pre-cleaned plastic containers.
5.2.3 Dominant Terminal Electron Accepting Processes (TEAPs) in Sediments and Sediment Manipulation in this Study
Understanding the dynamics of redox processes is key to predicting the fate and impact of
certain environmental contaminants (Davis et al. 1999; Kampbell et al. 1996; Van Stempvoort et
al. 2002). However, methods for evaluating redox processes are quite problematic. Platinum
92
electrode measurements of redox potential (Eh) are commonly used, and this in spite of the fact
that unique redox potentials in natural systems do not exist (Thorstenson 1984)—and that
measured Eh values do not agree with Eh values calculated from measured concentrations of
redox couples (Lindberg and Runnells 1984). This is likely due to the fact that most natural
systems are seldom in a state of redox equilibrium, and that platinum electrodes are subject to a
variety of interferences.
The use of molecular hydrogen (H2) as indicator of predominant TEAPs provides an
alternative method for evaluating redox processes in natural systems (Chapelle et al. 1996;
Lendvay and Adriaens 1999; Lovley et al. 1994; Lovley and Goodwin 1988; McGuire et al.
2000). In fact, fermentative microorganisms continuously produce H2 during anoxic
decomposition of organic matter, and the produced H2 is consumed by respiratory
microorganisms that use Fe(III), sulfate, or CO2 as terminal electron acceptors (Chapelle et al.
1996). Previous research (Lovley et al. 1994; Lovley and Goodwin 1988) has shown that in
sediment, H2 concentrations associated with specific TEAPs fall in quite well defined range of
values, which can be divided as follows: methanogenesis: from ~7 to >10 nM; sulfate reduction:
1 to 1.5 nM; Fe (III)-reduction: ~0.2 nM; Mn (IV) and/or nitrate-reduction: <0.05 nM.
However, while H2 concentrations are better indicator of redox potential than Eh
measurements, it is worth noting that H2 concentrations do have drawbacks as well. In certain
specific cases, H2 measurements have indicated the predominance of sulfate reduction in samples
that lacked significant sulfate concentrations (Chapelle et al. 1996). Also, its occurrence at trace
levels requires highly sensitive and expensive analytical techniques. Accordingly, for studies
conducted in batch reactors, one of the reliable and inexpensive approaches used electron-
93
acceptor availability and the presence of final products of microbial metabolism as illustrated in
half-reactions (equations 5-1 through 5-8).
OHeHaqO 22 21)(
41
=++ −+ (5-1)
OHNOeHNO 223 21
21
21
+=++ −−+− (5-2)
OHgONeHNO 223 85)(
81
45
41
+=++ −+− (5-3)
OHgNeHNO 223 53)(
101
56
51
+=++ −+− (5-4)
OHMneHSMnO 22
2 2212)(
21
+=++ +−+ (5-5)
)aq()s( FeeFe +−+ =+ 23 (5-6)
OHHSeHSO 224 2
181
89
81
+=++ −−+− (5-7)
OHgCHeHgCO 242 41)(
81)(
81
+=++ −+ (5-8)
The occurrence of the above geochemical reactions is thermodynamically driven, as
reactions with the lowest Gibbs free energy are favored when several TEAs are present in the
system. Accordingly, simple measurements of certain reactants ( −3NO , +3Fe , and −2
4SO ) and
products ( −2NO , ON2 , +2Fe , and 4CH ) of redox reactions associated with the degradation of a
tracer organic compounds can help identifiy the potential impacts, if any, of MNs on rates of
these microbial-catalyzed geochemical reactions.
This study focused primarily on sediment microorganisms that utilize nitrate (equations
5-2, 5-3, and 5-4) or sulfate (equation 5-7) as TEAs. In the laboratory, and prior to MNs testing,
94
relatively diluted sediment slurries (1:5 m/v) were prepared under continuous stirring in 3 L glass
containers, purged with N2, and hermetically sealed, The TEAs (e.g. nitrate, Mn and Fe
oxyhydroxides, and sulfate) naturally present in sediments were allowed to be consumed over
time, and after about three weeks, IC analyses of filtrate aliquots from slurries showed that
nitrate was mostly converted to nitrite and sulfate concentrations averaged ~24 mg/L. At this
point, aliquots of well-homogenized sediment slurries were transferred into 50 ml serum vials
within an anaerobic chamber and then spiked with a small volume of a highly concentrated
solution of sodium acetate (CH3COONa) to obtain a final concentration of ~150 mg CH3COO-
per liter of slurry. In parallel, sediment slurries with final concentrations of 150 ppm of
CH3COO- and 100 ppm of either −3NO or −2
4SO were also prepared to re-establish the prevalence
of these specific TEAs and favor biogeochemical reactions catalyzed by either nitrate- or sulfate-
reducing bacteria. Hermetically sealed vials were placed in the dark and the microbial
degradation of acetate monitored over time in both MNs non-spiked (i.e. controls) and spiked
slurries. Tested MNs included aqueous suspensions of C60, CdSe quantum dots, and nano-Ag at
final concentrations of 0.14 ppm, 0.5 ppm and 0.2 ppm, respectively. These tested concentrations
were based on the IC50 values of these MNs determined previously in toxicity tests using the P.
subcapitata 96-h chronic toxicity assay. Disposable syringes were used to withdraw samples
from the vials, followed by filtration through 0.45 μm syringe-filters in the anaerobic chamber.
The filtrates were then analyzed for −COOCH3 , −3NO , −
2NO and −24SO by ion chromatography
(see analytical techniques below). Obtained results were fit to a pseudo-first order kinetic model
to help assess the impact of MNs on rates of acetate oxidation by indigenous sediment’s
microorganisms. All experiments were run in triplicates.
95
5.2.4 Analytical Techniques
The concentrations of −COOCH3 , −3NO , −
2NO and −24SO were determined by ion
chromatography (Metrohm 700-series IC system). Concentration of obtained aqueous fullerene
suspension (nC60) was measured by a method adapted from Deguchi et al. (2001). Briefly, the
fullerene suspension, a 2% NaCl solution and toluene were mixed in a 1:1:2 ratio and then
sonicated for 10 minutes. After separation of the aqueous and organic phases, the upper toluene
layer was withdrawn for absorbance measurement at 334 nm using a Hach DR/4000U
Spectrophotometer.
5.2.5 Data Analysis
All experiments were run in triplicates and obtained data presented as mean ± 1 standard
deviation. Differences amongst the treatment effects were analyzed using one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons of anion concentrations.
Differences were considered significant when p values were < 0.05.
5.3 Results and Discussion
In these experiments, nitrate and sulfate were added to sediment slurries to establish
predominant TEAPs, and then assess the impacts of tested MNs on bacteria that use nitrate or
sulfate as TEA during organic matter oxidation.
Figure 5-1 shows trends of acetate degradation (5-1a), nitrate (5-1b), nitrite (5-1c), and
sulfate (5-1d) in sediment slurries spiked with acetate, tested MNs, without either nitrate or
sulfate. Accordingly, nitrate (~1 mg/L), nitrite (~5.7 mg/L), and sulfate (~24 mg/L)
concentrations at time zero here are levels naturally occurring in the sediment slurries prior to
sample incubations. Figures 5-2 and 5-3 are similar to Figure 5-1, except that the sediment
slurries were spiked with acetate and MNs, and with nitrate (Figure 5-2) or sulfate (Figure 5-3).
96
The acetate added to control and CdSe or nano-Ag spiked sediment slurries decreased in a
similar manner (Fig. 5-1a), resulting in comparable reaction rates of ~0.1 day-1 (Fig. 5-4a). In
contrast, acetate concentration in C60-treated slurries did not decrease over time, suggesting an
inhibition of microbiological processes leading to the oxidation of organic matter. During the 17-
days of incubation, trends in nitrate (Fig. 5-1b) and nitrite (Fig. 5-1c) in these sediment slurries
paralleled that of acetate, suggesting that both nitrate and nitrite were used as TEAs during
acetate oxidation, except in C60-treated slurries. Also, sample redox levels were not low enough
to favor sulfate reduction, as the concentrations of sulfate remained constant throughout the
experiment (Fig. 5-1d).
Figure 5-2 shows the importance of nitrate addition to sediment slurries and the response
of sediment microorganisms assessed through their ability to oxidize acetate. In these sediment
slurries, acetate degradation rates were much faster (Figs. 5-2a and 5-4b). But overall, observed
trends remain similar to those described earlier (Fig. 5-1), in that C60-treated samples resulted in
inhibition of acetate degradation, while CdSe- and nano-Ag spiked samples paralleled trends
observed in control samples. However, some trends were observed for both nitrate (Fig. 5-2b)
and nitrite (Fig. 5-2c). Soon after 5 days of incubation, divergent trends were observed and
generally decreased for nitrate, except in C60-treated sediment slurries. With regard to nitrite, and
besides the increasing trend observed in CdSe-treated slurries (i.e. likely conversion of nitrate to
nitrite), the other treatments resulted in either flat nitrite trend (i.e. no removal or addition in C60-
treated samples) or decreasing concentrations (Fig. 5-2c). These results suggest that different
pathways were used by microorganisms present in sediment slurries to oxidize acetate. In CdSe
treated slurries, nitrate reducers tended to produce nitrite (i.e. −3NO −
2NO ; Dou et al. 2008),
while the decrease in both nitrate and nitrite in sediment slurries spiked with nano-Ag and
97
acetate alone seemed to involve bacteria that convert these TEAs to either N2 or N2O (Radehaus
1997). Finally, sulfate concentrations did not undergo changes, as nitrate remained abundantly
available in the system after acetate was fully consumed.
Figure 5-3 shows the response of microorganisms in sediment slurries spiked with excess
sulfate to MNs addition. The lack of visible change in sulfate concentrations (Fig. 5-3d) shows
that sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) were not involved in any of the acetate degradation observed
in these experiments (Fig. 5-3a). To efficiently test the impacts on naturally occurring sediment
SRB, it would have been necessary to deplete the tested sediment slurries of their original
background sulfate through a long-term anaerobic incubation in order to expect a significant
microbiological response attributable primarily to SRB. Figures 5-3b and 5-3c show that the
acetate degradation observed here is still tied to the coupled biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen
and organic carbon.
Overall, these results show that the disappearance of acetate from aqueous phase follows a
pseudo-first order kinetic in both MNs-treated and non-treated sediment slurries with the
exception of C60 treated samples. In the latter, concentrations of acetate remained almost
constant up to 17 days, implying a severe microbial inhibition by the C60-suspensions. In our
previous studies, we observed only impeded biodegradation of acetate even with a higher nC60
concentration of 0.5 ppm (Kopelevich et al. 2008). This difference is probably due to sediment
slurry preparation methods, i.e., use of highly diluted (in this study) versus thick (in study by
Kopelevich et al. 2008) slurries. The apparent rate of reaction (kapp, determined as the slope of
the regression of ln[Cacetate] versus time) is comparatively smaller in CdSe and nanosilver spiked
slurries than the control for acetate and nitrate spiked samples. The determined apparent reaction
rate (kapp) of acetate degradation was 0.44 day-1 for non-MNs-treated (i.e. controls) sediment
98
slurries and about two times lower for nanosilver (kapp= 0.24 day-1) and CdSe (kapp= 0.20 day-1)
treated sediment slurries
Although molecular probes such as the phosphor-lipid fatty acid (PLFA) profile would
have been helpful in identifying the dominant groups of microorganisms in sediments under
these specific experimental conditions, these results point to the potential of C60 to inhibit the
microbiologically driven oxidation of organic matter. This could be due to their bactericidal
effect (Fortner et al. 2005; Lyon et al. 2006).
5.4 Conclusions
In summary, the effects of MNs on sedimentary biogeochemical processes were studied.
Fullerene aqueous suspensions at a concentration that results in 50% inhibition growth of P.
subcapitata (i.e. 0.14 ppm) stopped the degradation of acetate by sediment microorganisms. In
contrast, nanosilver and CdSe treated sediment slurries slowed down rates of acetate oxidation
rather slightly in the presence of high nitrate concentrations. This could be an indication that
higher concentrations of these MNs would likely result in negative effects on sediment
microorganisms as well. Future research should combine the use of molecular probe and well-
defined redox conditions to pinpoint specific microbial groups and assess their responses when
they become exposed to increasing MNs concentrations.
99
Figure 5-1. Kinetics of acetate degradation (a), and nitrate (b), nitrite (c) and sulfate (d)
concentrations in sediment slurries without (controls) or spiked with tested nanomaterials (C60, nanosilver, and CdSe quantum dots). Vertical bars represent ± 1 standard deviation of the mean of three replicates.
100
Figure 5-2. Kinetics of acetate degradation (a), and nitrate (b), nitrite (c) and sulfate (d)
concentrations in sediment slurries spiked with excess nitrate and without (controls) or with tested nanomaterial additions (C60, nanosilver, and CdSe quantum dots). Vertical bars represent ± 1 standard deviation of the mean of three replicates.
101
Figure 5-3. Kinetics of acetate degradation (a), and nitrate (b), nitrite (c) and sulfate (d)
concentrations in sediment slurries spiked with excess sulfate and without (controls) or with tested nanomaterial additions (C60, nanosilver, and CdSe quantum dots). Vertical bars represent ± 1 standard deviation of the mean of three replicates.
102
Figure 5-4. Pseudo-first order kinetics of acetate disappearance from sediment-slurries treated with either silver nanoparticles or CdSe quantum dots as compared to the non-treated controls. Ln(C) represents the natural log of acetate concentration in mg/L. (a) = slurries containing acetate only, (b) = slurries with both acetate and nitrate additions, and (c) = slurries with acetate and sulfate additions.
103
CHAPTER 6 NANOWASTES IN THE ENVIRONMENT: THE “TROJAN HORSE EFFECT” OF
NANOMATERIALS
6.1 Introduction
The environmental fate and transport of manufactured nanomaterials (MNs) as well as the
fate of pollutants sorbed onto MNs through nanotechnology-based remediation processes are of
growing concern. This is because nanoscience and nanotechnology are now poised to become the
most important drivers of economic growth and development for the early 21st century. Most
scientists and engineers are confident that nanoscience and nanotechnology will revolutionize
medicinal, industrial, agricultural, and environmental research as a wide variety of MNs are
being produced (Hurt et al. 2006). Although in its infancy, research on both the environmental
impacts and health implications of MNs is fast growing (Biswas and Wu 2005; Goodman et al.
2004; Oberdorster 2004; Oberdorster et al. 2006; Sayes et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2004). In contrast,
the fate and potential impacts of pollutants adsorbed onto MNs through nanotechnology-based
remediation processes have been simply ignored. For instance, the use of MNs in the removal of
pollutants from either aqueous and/or gaseous effluents will generate nanowastes that need to be
either recycled or disposed of safely. So far, a reactive approach has been the most common way
of dealing with emerging pollutants (Daughton 2004). Unfortunately, a major disadvantage of
this late corrective approach is the difficulty to deal with well-established economic activities
that generate the pollutants of concern. Therefore, a proactive approach is ideal to limit the
complex ramifications associated with delayed prevention and remediation measures (Daughton
2004).
We assessed the fate and potential impacts of Hg sorbed onto MNs (i.e. SiO2-TiO2
nanocomposites) by mimicking the “Trojan horse” effect in a sediment matrix. Spent SiO2-TiO2
104
nanocomposites used in the removal of Hg from a simulated coal combustion effluent were used
in laboratory studies to determine the bioavailability of inorganic Hg sorbed onto SiO2-TiO2
nanocomposites by using Hg methylation as a proxy for bioavailability, and the toxicity of Hg-
SiO2-TiO2 complexes using FluoroMetPLATE®, a bacterial based microbiotest.
6.2 Materials and Methods
A thorough description of the procedure used to prepare the SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites as
well as the mechanisms of Hg sorption onto MN surfaces have been reported previously
(Pitoniak et al. 2005). For measurement of Hg bioavailability using microbial catalyzed
methylation as surrogate for bioaccessibilty and to minimize the Hg methylation signal
associated with the sediment native Hg, we intentionally used pristine sediments with a
background total Hg (THg) concentration of only 5.68 ± 0.44 ng g-1 wet weight (Odum Wetland,
Gainesville, FL, USA). This THg value falls on the low end of the reported global background
range, for which common values are mostly between 200 and 400 ng Hg/g. Sediments were first
sieved (<2 mm) to produce a homogeneous fine material, and used later in laboratory
experiments as source of Hg methylating bacteria. Hg methylation experiments were conducted
using sediment slurries prepared with Nanopure® water in a 1:5 ratio (mass/volume). The initial
pH of the slurries was 4, and a 0.1N NaOH solution was used to produce slurries with pH>4. All
prepared sediment slurries were then de-aerated with ultra high purity (UHP) N2 to help
accelerate the development of anoxic conditions and favor methyl-Hg production. Overall, the
experiment consisted of control slurries with no Hg addition and slurries spiked with Hg as Hg-
SiO2-TiO2 complexes. In this latter treatment, Hg was added to increase the background amount
of THg naturally present in sediments by about 40%. Tubes were then sacrificed at different time
periods and analyzed for produced methyl-Hg. In the present study, total- and methyl-Hg
concentrations in aqueous phase and sediments were determined following previously published
105
methods (Bloom 1989; Bloom and Crecelius 1983; Bonzongo and Lyons 2004; Warner et al.
2003).
To assess the toxicity of SiO2-TiO2-nanocomposites used in Hg removal from gaseous
effluents, both virgin and spent SiO2-TiO2-nanocomposites were leached separately using the
Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) solution, which is a mixture of HNO3 and
H2SO4 with a final pH of 4.22 ± 0.05 (USEPA 1996). Based on preliminary determinations of
percent inhibition, a 1:60 ratio (ml/mg) was used and for each replicate, about 0.18g of either
single nano-oxides (i.e. SiO2 and TiO2), virgin SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites or Hg-loaded SiO2-
TiO2 nanocomposites were leached with 3 ml of SPLP solution on a rotoshaker® for 18 h. After
centrifugation, aliquots of the supernatant were removed and immediately used for toxicity
assays, and analyzed for THg determination following digestion with bromine monochloride
(Bloom and Crecelius 1983).
6.3 Results and Discussion
Our results show that the treatment imposed upon these slurries induces the methylation of
both background Hg initially present in the sediment (control) and Hg added as Hg-
nanocomposite complexes. The percentage of THg methylated from the Hg-SiO2-TiO2-
complexes added to slurries and corrected from control samples is shown in Figure 6-1 as a
function of pH. These results show an increasing and pH-dependent trend of methyl-Hg
production over time, with more methyl-Hg produced at the lowest tested pH. This trend
suggests that microbial Hg methylation could be controlled by the solubility of adsorbed Hg onto
MNs, which decreases with increasing pH. Although this trend can also be attributed to the effect
of pH change on Hg methylating microorganisms, it is rather clear that the detection of methyl-
Hg under these tested conditions, regardless of the amount produced, is a strong indication of the
bioavailability of Hg-sorbed onto SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites.
106
Using the linear portion of the above described Hg methylation trends, and assuming that
the methylation rates of inorganic Hg would be far in excess of the rates of demethylation of
produced methyl-Hg (i.e., Km>>Kd), a pseudo first order kinetics assumption would then allow
the determination of the reaction rates at different pH (Figure 6-2). The determined constant rates
for Hg methylation in slurries spiked with Hg-SiO2-TiO2 complexes were km=0.02 day-1 and
km=0.004 day-1 at pH 4 and 5, respectively, and the constant rate approached zero at pH 6 as
methyl-Hg levels in sediment slurries became barely detectable. Additionally, the rate
determined at pH 4 was about one order of magnitude lower than the reaction rate observed in
sediments slurries spiked with free ionic Hg added as HgCl2. Although the experiment with
HgCl2 additions was used at the native sediment pH only (pH 4); the obtained results suggest that
Hg sorption onto nanocomposites delays its bioaccessibility. Overall, Hg adsorbed onto MN and
introduced into sedimentary environments could quickly become bioavailable and therefore toxic
in more acidic systems.
The concentration of THg bound onto the SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites averaged 639.04 ±
366.31 ng Hg/g nanomaterials, while THg concentrations on plain materials were at or below our
analytical detection limits. The SPLP extraction procedure was comparatively applied to SiO2
and TiO2 nanoparticles, ultra-violet (UV) irradiated virgin SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites, and the
Hg-contaminated UV-irradiated nanocomposites (Pitoniak et al. 2005). Obtained leachates were
then used for toxicity testing with FluoroMetPLATETM, which is specific to heavy metal toxicity
(Bitton et al. 1994). The toxicity results expressed as percent inhibition are presented in Figure
6-3. Based on this toxicity test, SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles are rather non-toxic despite the 4%
inhibition response obtained with SiO2 leachate. In contrast, both the virgin and Hg-
contaminated nanocomposites show a much higher toxicity with average inhibition values of
107
57% and 84%, respectively. It appears that both the support material (i.e. SiO2-TiO2
nanocomposites) and Hg adsorbed onto it contribute to the recorded inhibition. The toxicity of
virgin SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites (57% inhibition) is likely due to its physicochemical
characteristics, while the much higher inhibition recorded with the Hg-contaminated SiO2-TiO2
nanocomposites indicates an additional toxicity effect due to the adsorbed toxic Hg. In sediment
slurries spiked with SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites, the above observed toxicity could translate into
reduced Hg methylation as bacteria involved in Hg biotransformation become impacted.
Consequently, the detection of methyl-Hg in these methylation experiments points to the
potential bioavailability of Hg sorbed onto SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites.
6.4 Conclusions
In summary, pollutants loaded MNs from nanotechnology-based remediation processes
could result in potential concerns related to the environmental fate of adsorbed pollutants as they
ultimately enter natural (e.g., waterways) or engineered (e.g. landfills) systems as waste streams.
When compared to sediments spiked with free HgCl2, the addition of MN-adsorbed Hg to
sediments slurries resulted in slower rates of methyl-Hg production and near total inhibition of
Hg methylation at pH≥6. Overall, these results point to the potential for bioaccessbility of MN-
adsorbed pollutants as a function of certain key environmental parameters such as acidic pH.
These preliminary results clearly illustrate the need for further research that could lead to
guidelines for the handling and disposal of nanowastes.
108
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 2 4 6 8
Time (days)
% T
Hg
conv
erte
d to
met
hyl-H
g
pH 4 pH 5 pH 6
Figure 6-1. Percent THg converted to methyl-Hg in sediment slurries spiked with SiO2-TiO2-Hg complexes and incubated at different pH. At pH 6, methyl-Hg concentrations were either below or at the analytical detection limit of 0.05 ng/g.
109
pH 6
pH 5k = 0.0041/day
r 2 =0.9755
pH 4 k = 0.02/dayr 2 =0.9328
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (days)
-Ln(
1-([M
eHg]
/TH
g))
Figure 6-2. Kinetics of Hg methylation in sediment slurries spiked with SiO2-TiO2-Hg complexes at pH 4 (triangles; native pH), 5 (circles), and 6 (squares). The methylation of inorganic Hg decreases with increasing pH to reach values below the analytical detection limit at pH 6.
110
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
SiO2 nanoparticle TiO2 nanoparticle UV-irradiatednon-used TiO2-
SiO2nanocomposites
Hg-TiO2-SiO2complexes
% In
hibi
tion
Figure 6-3. Toxicity effect of Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure (SPLP) solutions obtained from leaching of virgin and Hg-loaded SiO2-TiO2 nanocomposites in a 1:60 ratio (ml SPLP/mg nanomaterials). Results are expressed as percent (%) inhibition.
Not Detected
111
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 Conclusions
Nanotechnology is a highly promising and exciting cross-cutting molecular technology
that spans many areas of science and technological applications. However, due to the relative
novelty of this technology very little has been done to assess the risks to biological systems; and
concerns about the use of the products of nanotechnology are being increasingly expressed in
public and in the media (Colvin et al. 2003). Our current knowledge of the harmful effects of
nanoparticles remains very limited and data on biotic and abiotic transformations of MNs in
natural systems are limited.
This research focused on potential environmental impacts of MNs, and the use of
toxicological, hydrological and biogeochemical approaches has resulted in the following
conclusions.
• Toxicity testing was based on three different microbiotests emphasizing the interactions of
MNs with (i) biochemical processes (i.e. the MetPLATE test), (ii) the growth of a
unicellular freshwater green algae (P. subcapitata), and (iii) the survival of an aquatic
invertebrate (C.dubia). Both the suspending medium for MNs and MNs themselves
exhibited different degrees of toxicity as a function of concentration and testing methods.
The use of different toxicity methods is necessary to avoid erroneous results. This is
because different test organisms respond differently to different toxicants. Amongst the
nanometal particles tested, nano-silver and nano-copper displayed the highest toxicity.
Aqueous fullerene suspensions prepared by use of organic solvent (THF) and SWNT
suspensions in Gum Arabic (a non-toxic surfactant used in this study) showed higher
degrees of toxicity as compared to water sonicated suspensions. Although the toxicity
112
mechanisms were not addressed in this study, the toxicity of these MNs could be
attributable to their ability to generate highly reactive and toxic free radicals, their degree
of purity as toxic impurities increase toxicity, or simple surface interaction with cell
membranes.
• The suspension of selected toxic MNs (i.e. C60, nano-silver, and nano-copper) in natural water matrices with varying DOC content and ionic strength showed that toxicity results obtained from laboratory experiments that use drastic MNs suspension methods may not be realistic. It was found that the suspensions of MNs in natural waters varied significantly with water chemistry and particle chemical composition and reactivity.
• Using soil columns to assess the transport of SWNTs in heterogeneous porous media, it was found that soil texture/characteristics and solution chemistry (i.e. the composition of the liquid used to suspend SWNTs) affect the transport of this highly hydrophobic MN, as surface charges of the MNs influence their adsorption and dispersion in the porous media. Finally, the use of a convection-dispersion model was able to accurately predict SWNTs transport in sandy soils, with a strong correlation between data obtained experimentally and simulated ones.
• The effects of C60, nano-Ag and CdSe quatum dots on sediment microbial activity were studied in slurries. C60 appeared to be highly toxic to bacteria involved in organic matter oxidation, primarily nitrate and nitrite reducers. Nano-silver and CdSe quantum dots were less toxic at tested concentrations, but gave the indication of potential pronounced negative effects on microorganisms at much higher concentrations.
• The fate and transformation of an example pollutant adsorbed onto MNs indicated that under specific environmental conditions, MNs could act as carriers of the pollutant adsorbed onto them. If this constitutes an advantage with regard to medical research, it could have negative implications in the environment.
7.2 Recommendations
Based on our findings, the following recommendations are made to further the extent of
knowledge of the environmental implications of MNs:
• Conduct tests focusing on long-term effects of MNs. Although toxicity was detected in short term for all MNs tested, long term tests may be needed to explore their toxicity mechanism and the effect of their transformation in the environment.
• Detailed characterization of MNs (e.g. speciation) in aqueous systems is needed in order to better understand the behavior and fate of MNs in natural environments.
113
• The use of mathematical models to explore the transport patterns of MNs in different types of soils should be considered as it can help predict the potential dispersal of MNs in porous media.
• Although our study observed negative impacts of MNs on sediment microorganisms, further investigations are needed to pinpoint the microbial groups that are sensitive to MN toxicity. Molecular techniques could reveal the shifts in sediment microbial populations following contamination by nanomaterials.
Overall, since there is so little data available for aquatic environments, research is required
to test the behavior and particulate binding properties of MNs in both freshwater and seawater.
The relative importance of different biological routes of uptake also needs to be assessed in
representative aquatic species, since this will be a crucial factor governing intracellular behavior,
distribution, fate and toxicity of internalized MNs.
A major challenge remains the derivation of toxicity thresholds for MNs; and determining
whether or not currently available biomarkers of harmful effects are effective for the new
discipline of environmental nanotoxicology. If new methods are required to adequately assess
the toxicity of MNs, then such new methods will also need to be, linked if possible, with
functional ecosystem indices. Such linkages would be desirable in order to bridge the gap
between individual organism “health-status” and ecosystem-level functional properties.
114
APPENDIX A TESTED CONCENTRATIONS OF CARBON- AND METAL-BASED NANOMATERIALS
IN THREE DIFFERENT TOXICITY ASSAYS
Table A-1. Tested concentrations of carbon- and metal-based nanomaterials in three different toxicity assays
Tested Nanomaterials
Concentrations Used in 48-h Ceriodaphnia dubia Assay (mg/L)
Concentrations Used in 96-h P. subcapitata Chronic Assay (mg/L)
Concentrations Used in MetPLATE
Test (mg/L)
Nano-silver 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.09, 0.1 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.25, 0.3 4, 8, 16, 24, 32
Nano-copper 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 0.5, 0.52, 0.54, 0.56, 0.58, 0.6 4, 8, 16, 24, 32
Nano-cobalt 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 NA
Nano-nickel 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8 0.25, 0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.45 NA
Nano-aluminum 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 NA
Fullerenes (C60) 0.27, 0.41, 0.54, 0.68,
0.81 0.11, 0.14, 0.16, 0.19,
0.22
SWNT suspended in Gum Arabic
(GA) 0.24, 0.26, 0.28, 0.3, 0.32 1.37, 1.92, 2.47, 3.02,
3.57,
115
APPENDIX B TESTED CONCENTRATIONS OF MANUFACTURED NANOMATERIAL SUSPENSIONS
IN TOXICITY TESTS USING THE C. DAPHNIA 48-H ACUTE TOXICITY ASSAY AND METPLATE TEST
Table B-1. Tested concentrations of manufactured nanomaterial suspensions in toxicity tests using the C. daphnia 48-h acute toxicity assay and MetPLATE test
Nanomaterial Suspensions
Concentrations Used in 48-h Ceriodaphnia dubia Assay
(mg/L)
Concentrations Used in MetPLATE Test (μg/L)
Ag-SR1 5.4, 5.94, 6.48, 7.02, 7.56 NA
Ag-SR2 0.68, 0.72, 0.765, 0.81, 0.85 NA
Ag-SR3 0.59, 0.66, 0.73, 0.79, 0.83 66.27, 79.52, 92.78, 106.03, 119.29, 132.54
Ag-DI 432.9, 449.55, 466.2, 482.85, 499.5 33.3, 41.63, 49.95, 58.28, 66.6
Cu-SR1 32.72, 35.24, 37.75, 40.27, 45.30 12.58, 18.88, 25.17, 31.46, 37.75
Cu-SR2 6.66, 6.95, 7.24, 7.53, 7.82 28.96, 57.92, 86.88, 115.84, 144.8, 173.76, 202.72
Cu-SR3 25.5, 30.6, 35.7, 40.8, 45.9, 51 127.5, 153, 178.5, 204, 229.5, 255
Cu-DI 1.61, 1.88, 2.14, 2.41, 2.68 NA
C60-SR1 NA NA
C60-SR2 NA NA
C60-SR3 NA NA
C60-DI NA NA
116
LIST OF REFERENCES
Adams LK, Lyon DY, Alvarez PJJ. 2006. Comparative eco-toxicity of nanoscale TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO water suspensions. Water Research 40(19):3527-3532.
Ajayan PM, Charlier JC, Rinzler AG. 1999. Carbon nanotubes: From macromolecules to
nanotechnology. P Natl Acad Sci USA 96(25):14199-14200. Apte SC, Batley GE, Bowles KC, Brown PL, Creighton N, Hales LT, et al. 2005. A comparison
of copper speciation measurements with the toxic responses of three sensitive freshwater organisms. Environ Chem 2(4):320-330.
Arbogast JW, Darmanyan AP, Foote CS, Rubin Y, Diederich FN, Alvarez MM, et al. 1991.
Photophysical Properties of C60. J Phys Chem-Us 95(1):11-12. Arnall AH. 2003. Future Technologies, Today's Choices. London:Greenpeace Environmental
Trust. Balasubramanian K, Burghard M. 2006. Biosensors based on carbon nanotubes. Anal Bioanal
Chem 385(3):452-468. Bales RC, Hinkle SR, Kroeger TW, Stocking K, Gerba CP. 1991. Bacteriophage Adsorption
during Transport through Porous-Media - Chemical Perturbations and Reversibility. Environmental Science & Technology 25(12):2088-2095.
Bales RC, Li SM, Maguire KM, Yahya MT, Gerba CP. 1993. Ms-2 and Poliovirus Transport in
Porous-Media - Hydrophobic Effects and Chemical Perturbations. Water Resour Res 29(4):957-963.
Biswas P, Wu CY. 2005. 2005 Critical Review: Nanoparticles and the environment. J Air Waste
Manage 55(6):708-746. Bitton G. 1975. Adsorption of Viruses onto Surfaces in Soil and Water. Water Research 9(5-
6):473-484. Bitton G, Davidson JM, Farrah SR. 1979. Value of Soil Columns for Assessing the Transport
Pattern of Viruses through Soils - Critical Outlook. Water Air and Soil Pollution 12(4):449-457.
Bitton G, Gifford GE, Pancorbo OC, Overman AR. 1978. Retention of Viruses during Sludge
Application to Soils. Prog Water Technol 10(5):597-606. Bitton G, Jung K, Koopman B. 1994. Evaluation of a Microplate Assay Specific for Heavy-
Metal Toxicity. Arch Environ Con Tox 27(1):25-28. Bitton G, Pancorbo OC, Farrah SR. 1984. Virus Transport and Survival after Land Application
of Sewage-Sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 47(5):905-909.
117
Bloom N. 1989. Determination of Picogram Levels of Methylmercury by Aqueous Phase Ethylation, Followed by Cryogenic Gas-Chromatography with Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Detection. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46(7):1131-1140.
Bloom NS, Crecelius EA. 1983. Determination of Mercury in Seawater at Sub-Nanogram Per
Liter Levels. Mar Chem 14(1):49-59. Bonzongo JCJ, Lyons WB. 2004. Impact of land use and physicochemical settings on aqueous
methylmercury levels in the Mobile-Alabama River System. Ambio 33(6):328-333. Borderieux S, Wu CY, Bonzongo JC, Powers K. 2004. Control of elemental mercury vapor in
combustion systems using Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Aerosol and Air Quality 4(1):74-90. Borm PJA. 2002. Particle toxicology: From coal mining to nanotechnology. Inhal Toxicol
14(3):311-324. Borm PJA, Schins RPF, Albrecht C. 2004. Inhaled particles and lung cancer, part B: Paradigms
and risk assessment. Int J Cancer 110(1):3-14. Brant J, Lecoanet H, Hotze M, Wiesner M. 2005. Comparison of electrokinetic properties of
colloidal fullerenes (nC60) formed using two procedures. Environmental Science & Technology 39(17):6343-6351.
Brant J, Lecoanet H, Wiesner MR. 2005. Aggregation and deposition characteristics of fullerene
nanoparticles in aqueous systems. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7(4-5):545-553. Braydich-Stolle L, Hussain S, Schlager JJ, Hofmann MC. 2005. In vitro cytotoxicity of
nanoparticles in mammalian germline stem cells. Toxicological Sciences 88(2):412-419. Brumfiel G. 2003. Nanotechnology: A little knowledge ... Nature 424(6946):246-248. Bury NR, Galvez F, Wood CM. 1999. Effects of chloride, calcium, and dissolved organic carbon
on silver toxicity: Comparison between rainbow trout and fathead minnows. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(1):56-62.
Bury NR, Shaw J, Glover C, Flogstrand C. 2002. Derivation of a toxicity-based model to predict
how water chemistry influences silver toxicity to invertebrates. Comp Biochem Phys C 133(1-2):259-270.
Cai YQ, Cai YE, Mou SF, Lu YQ. 2005. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase
extraction adsorbent for the determination of chlorophenols in environmental water samples. J Chromatogr A 1081(2):245-247.
Cantwell MG, Burgess RM. 2001. Metal-colloid partitioning in artificial interstitial waters of marine sediments: Influences of salinity, pH, and colloidal organic carbon concentration. Environ Toxicol Chem 20(11):2420-2427.
118
Chapelle FH, Haack SK, Adriaens P, Henry MA, Bradley PM. 1996. Comparison of E(h) and H2 measurements for delineating redox processes in a contaminated aquifer. Environmental Science & Technology 30(12):3565-3569.
Chattopadhyay D, Chattopadhyay S, Lyon WG, Wilson JT. 2002. Effect of surfactants on the
survival and sorption of viruses. Environmental Science & Technology 36(19):4017-4024.
Chen J, Wang XJ, Hu JD, Tao S. 2006. Modeling surfactant LAS influenced PAHs migration in
soil column. Water Air and Soil Pollution 176(1-4):217-232. Chen KL, Elimelech M. 2007. Influence of humic acid on the aggregation kinetics of fullerene
(C60) nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 309(1):126-134.
Chen Z, Meng HA, Xing GM, Chen CY, Zhao YL, Jia GA, et al. 2006. Acute toxicological
effects of copper nanoparticles in vivo. Toxicology Letters 163(2):109-120. Chendorain M, Yates M, Villegas F. 1998. The fate and transport of viruses through surface
water constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Quality 27(6):1451-1458. Cheng JP, Flahaut E, Cheng SH. 2007. Effect of carbon nanotubes on developing zebrafish
(Danio rerio) embryos. Environ Toxicol Chem 26(4):708-716. Cheng L, Chetochine AS, Pepper IL, Brusseau ML. 2007. Influence of DOC on MS-2
bacteriophage transport in a sandy soil. Water Air and Soil Pollution 178(1-4):315-322. Cho SJ, Maysinger D, Jain M, Roder B, Hackbarth S, Winnik FM. 2007. Long-term exposure to
CdTe quantum dots causes functional impairments in live cells. Langmuir 23(4):1974-1980.
Christen K. 2007. Nanomaterials meet increased scrutiny. In: ES&T News, 671-672. Chu YJ, Jin Y, Baumann T, Yates MV. 2003. Effect of soil properties on saturated and
unsaturated virus transport through columns. Journal of Environmental Quality 32(6):2017-2025.
Cientifica. 2005. Nanotubes Production.
http://www.cientifica.eu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=37&Itemid=74. Close ME, Pang L, Flintoft MJ, Sinton LW. 2006. Distance and flow effects on microsphere
transport in a large gravel column. Journal of Environmental Quality 35(4):1204-1212. Colvin VL. 2003. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat
Biotechnol 21(10):1166-1170.
119
Daughton CG. 2004. Non-regulated water contaminants: emerging research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24(7-8):711-732.
Davis GB, Barber C, Power TR, Thierrin J, Patterson BM, Rayner JL, et al. 1999. The variability
and intrinsic remediation of a BTEX plume in anaerobic sulphate-rich groundwater. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 36(3-4):265-290.
Davis SS. 1997. Biomedical applications of nanotechnology - Implications for drug targeting and
gene therapy. Trends Biotechnol 15(6):217-224. Davoren M, Herzog E, Casey A, Cottineau B, Chambers G, Byrne HJ, et al. 2007. In vitro
toxicity evaluation of single walled carbon nanotubes on human A549 lung cells. Toxicology in Vitro 21(3):438-448.
Deguchi S, Alargova RG, Tsujii K. 2001. Stable dispersions of fullerenes, C60 and C70, in water.
Preparation and characterization. Langmuir 17(19):6013-6017. Deguchi S, Yamazaki T, Mukai S, Usami R, Horikoshi K. 2007. Stabilization of C60
nanoparticles by protein adsorption and its implications for toxicity studies. Chemical Research in Toxicology 20(6):854-858.
Del Castillo CE, Gilbes F, Coble PG, Muller-Karger FE. 2000. On the dispersal of riverine
colored dissolved organic matter over the West Florida Shelf. Limnol Oceanogr 45(6):1425-1432.
Derfus AM, Chan WCW, Bhatia SN. 2004. Probing the cytotoxicity of semiconductor quantum
dots. Nano Letters 4(1):11-18. Dou JF, Liu X, Hu ZF, Deng D. 2008. Anaerobic BTEX biodegradation linked to nitrate and
sulfate reduction. Journal of Hazardous Materials 151(2-3):720-729. Du WL, Xu YL, Xu ZR, Fan CL. 2008. Preparation, characterization and antibacterial properties
against E-coli K-88 of chitosan nanoparticle loaded copper ions. Nanotechnology 19(8):085707.
Eng TR. 2004. Population health technologies - Emerging innovations for the health of the
public. Am J Prev Med 26(3):237-242. Erickson RJ, Benoit DA, Mattson VR, Nelson HP, Leonard EN. 1996. The effects of water
chemistry on the toxicity of copper to fathead minnows. Environ Toxicol Chem 15(2):181-193.
Erickson RJ, Brooke LT, Kahl MD, Venter FV, Harting SL, Markee TP, et al. 1998. Effects of
laboratory test conditions on the toxicity of silver to aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 17(4):572-578.
120
Espinasse B, Hotze EM, Wiesner MR. 2007. Transport and retention of colloidal aggregates of C60 in porous media: Effects of organic macromolecules, ionic composition, and preparation method. Environmental Science & Technology 41(21):7396-7402.
ETCGroup. 2003. Size Matters! The Case for a Global Moratorium. Occasional Paper Series
7(1):1-14. ETCGroupGenotype. 2004. Nano's Troubled Waters: Latest toxic warning shows nanoparticles
cause brain damage in aquatic species and highlights need for a moratorium on the release of new nanomaterials.
Fan FRF, Bard AJ. 2002. Chemical, electrochemical, gravimetric, and microscopic studies on
antimicrobial silver films. J Phys Chem B 106(2):279-287. Feng N, Dagan R, Bitton G. 2007. Toxicological approach for assessing the heavy metal binding
capacity of soils. Soil Sediment Contam 16(5):451-458. Fischer HC, Chan WC. 2007. Nanotoxicity: the growing need for in vivo study. Curr Opin
Biotech 18(6):565-571. Florence AT, Hillery AM, Hussain N, Jani PU. 1995. Nanoparticles as Carriers for Oral Peptide
Absorption - Studies on Particle Uptake and Fate. J Control Release 36(1-2):39-46. Fortner JD, Lyon DY, Sayes CM, Boyd AM, Falkner JC, Hotze EM, et al. 2005. C60 in water:
Nanocrystal formation and microbial response. Environmental Science & Technology 39(11):4307-4316.
Funderburg SW, Moore BE, Sagik BP, Sorber CA. 1981. Viral Transport through Soil Columns
under Conditions of Saturated Flow. Water Research 15(6):703-711. Garg A, Sinnott SB. 1998. Effect of chemical functionalization on the mechanical properties of
carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 295(4):273-278. Gharbi N, Pressac M, Hadchouel M, Szwarc H, Wilson SR, Moussa F. 2005. [60]Fullerene is a
powerful antioxidant in vivo with no acute or subacute toxicity. Nano Letters 5(12):2578-2585.
Glover CN, Playle RC, Wood CM. 2005. Heterogeneity of natural organic matter amelioration of
silver toxicity to Daphnia magna: Effect of source and equilibration time. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(11):2934-2940.
Glover CN, Wood CM. 2005. Accumulation and elimination of silver in Daphnia magna and the
effect of natural organic matter. Aquat Toxicol 73(4):406-417. Goodman CM, McCusker CD, Yilmaz T, Rotello VM. 2004. Toxicity of gold nanoparticles
functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. Bioconjugate Chem 15(4):897-900.
121
Griffitt RJ, Weil R, Hyndman KA, Denslow ND, Powers K, Taylor D, et al. 2007. Exposure to
copper nanoparticles causes gill injury and acute lethality in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Environmental Science & Technology 41(23):8178-8186.
Grosell M, Blanchard J, Brix KV, Gerdes R. 2007. Physiology is pivotal for interactions between
salinity and acute copper toxicity to fish and invertebrates. Aquat Toxicol 84(2):162-172. Guo GN, Liu W, Liang JG, He ZK, Xu HB, Yang XL. 2007. Probing the cytotoxicity of CdSe
quantum dots with surface modification. Materials Letters 61(8-9):1641-1644. Gwinn MR, Vallyathan V. 2006. Nanoparticles: Health effects - Pros and cons. Environmental
Health Perspectives 114(12):1818-1825. Han J, Jin Y, Willson CS. 2006. Virus retention and transport in chemically heterogeneous
porous media under saturated and unsaturated flow conditions. Environmental Science & Technology 40(5):1547-1555.
Harhaji L, Isakovic A, Raicevic N, Markovic Z, Todorovic-Markovic B, Nikolic N, et al. 2007.
Multiple mechanisms underlying the anticancer action of nanocrystalline fullerene. Eur J Pharmacol 568(1-3):89-98.
Helland A, Wick P, Koehler A, Schmid K, Som C. 2007. Reviewing the environmental and
human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(8):1125-1131.
Heller DA, Mayrhofer RM, Baik S, Grinkova YV, Usrey ML, Strano MS. 2004. Concomitant
length and diameter separation of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 126(44):14567-14573.
Henry TB, Menn FM, Fleming JT, Wilgus J, Compton RN, Sayler GS. 2007. Attributing effects
of aqueous C60 nano-aggregates to tetrahydrofuran decomposition products in larval zebrafish by assessment of gene expression. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(7):1059-1065.
Heymann D. 1996. Solubility of fullerenes C60 and C70 in seven normal alcohols and their
deduced solubility in water. Fullerene Sci Techn 4(3):509-515. Hogstrand C, Wood CM. 1998. Toward a better understanding of the bioavailability, physiology
and toxicity of silver in fish: Implications for water quality criteria. Environ Toxicol Chem 17(4):547-561.
Hund-Rinke K, Simon M. 2006. Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles TiO2 on
algae and daphnids. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 13(4):225-232.
122
Hurt RH, Monthioux M, Kane A. 2006. Toxicology of carbon nanomaterials: Status, trends, and perspectives on the special issue. Carbon 44(6):1028-1033.
Hussain SM, Hess KL, Gearhart JM, Geiss KT, Schlager JJ. 2005. In vitro toxicity of
nanoparticles in BRL 3A rat liver cells. Toxicology in Vitro 19(7):975-983. Hyne RV, Pablo F, Julli M, Markich SJ. 2005. Influence of water chemistry on the acute toxicity
of copper and zinc to the cladoceran Ceriodaphnia cf dubia. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(7):1667-1675.
Hyung H, Fortner JD, Hughes JB, Kim JH. 2007. Natural organic matter stabilizes carbon
nanotubes in the aqueous phase. Environmental Science & Technology 41(1):179-184. Iijima S, Ichihashi T. 1993. Single-Shell Carbon Nanotubes of 1-Nm Diameter. Nature
363(6430):603-605. Isakovic A, Markovic Z, Todorovic-Markovic B, Nikolic N, Vranjes-Djuric S, Mirkovic M, et al.
2006. Distinct cytotoxic mechanisms of pristine versus hydroxylated fullerene. Toxicological Sciences 91(1):173-183.
Isobe H, Tanaka T, Maeda R, Noiri E, Solin N, Yudasaka M, et al. 2006. Preparation,
purification, characterization, and cytotoxicity assessment of water-soluble, transition-metal-free carbon nanotube aggregates. Angew Chem Int Edit 45(40):6676-6680.
Jain P, Pradeep T. 2005. Potential of silver nanoparticle-coated polyurethane foam as an
antibacterial water filter. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 90(1):59-63. Janes N, Playle RC. 1995. Modeling Silver-Binding to Gills of Rainbow-Trout (Oncorhynchus-
Mykiss). Environ Toxicol Chem 14(11):1847-1858. Jeng HA, Swanson J. 2006. Toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Journal of
Environmental Science and Health Part a-Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering 41(12):2699-2711.
Jensen AW, Wilson SR, Schuster DI. 1996. Biological applications of fullerenes. Bioorgan Med
Chem 4(6):767-779. Ji JH, Jung JH, Kim SS, Yoon JU, Park JD, Choi BS, et al. 2007. Twenty-eight-day inhalation
toxicity study of silver nanoparticles in Sprague-Dawley rats. Inhal Toxicol 19(10):857-871.
Jia G, Wang HF, Yan L, Wang X, Pei RJ, Yan T, et al. 2005. Cytotoxicity of carbon
nanomaterials: Single-wall nanotube, multi-wall nanotube, and fullerene. Environmental Science & Technology 39(5):1378-1383.
123
Jiang F, Zheng Z, Xu ZY, Zheng SR, Guo ZB, Chen LQ. 2006. Aqueous Cr(VI) photo-reduction catalyzed by TiO2 and sulfated TiO2. Journal of Hazardous Materials 134(1-3):94-103.
Jin J, Li R, Wang HL, Chen HN, Liang K, Ma JT. 2007. Magnetic Fe nanoparticle functionalized
water-soluble multi-walled carbon nanotubules towards the preparation of sorbent for aromatic compounds removal. Chem Commun(4):386-388.
Jin Y, Chu YJ, Li YS. 2000. Virus removal and transport in saturated and unsaturated sand
columns. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 43(2):111-128. Jin Y, Yates MV. 2002. Virus behavior in saturated and unsaturated subsurface media:Awwa
Research Foundation. Jin Y, Yates MV, Thompson SS, Jury WA. 1997. Sorption of viruses during flow through
saturated sand columns. Environmental Science & Technology 31(2):548-555. Juhna T, Klavins M, Eglite L. 2003. Sorption of humic substances on aquifer material at artificial
recharge of groundwater. Chemosphere 51(9):861-868. Kampbell DH, Wiedemeier TH, Hansen JE. 1996. Intrinsic bioremediation of fuel contamination
in ground water at a field site. Journal of Hazardous Materials 49(2-3):197-204. Kanel SR, Greneche JM, Choi H. 2006. Arsenic(V) removal kom groundwater using nano scale
zero-valent iron as a colloidal reactive barrier material. Environmental Science & Technology 40(6):2045-2050.
Kanel SR, Nepal D, Manning B, Choi H. 2007. Transport of surface-modified iron nanoparticle
in porous media and application to arsenic(III) remediation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 9(5):725-735.
Kang S, Pinault M, Pfefferle LD, Elimelech M. 2007. Single-walled carbon nanotubes exhibit
strong antimicrobial activity. Langmuir 23(17):8670-8673. Karakoti AS, Hench LL, Seal S. 2006. The potential toxicity of nanomaterials - The role of
surfaces. Jom 58(7):77-82. Karn B. 2004. Nanotechnology and the Environment: A Charge to EPA Nano Grantees. In: Nano
Grantees’ Progress Review Workshop2004, Philadelphia, PA. Ke PC, Qiao R. 2007. Carbon nanomaterials in biological systems. Journal of Physics-
Condensed Matter 19(37):373101. Ki HY, Kim JH, Kwon SC, Jeong SH. 2007. A study on multifunctional wool textiles treated
with nano-sized silver. Journal of Materials Science 42(19):8020-8024.
124
Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, et al. 2007. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomed-Nanotechnol 3(1):95-101.
Kim SD, Ma HZ, Allen HE, Cha DK. 1999. Influence of dissolved organic matter on the toxicity
of copper to Ceriodaphnia dubia: Effect of complexation kinetics. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(11):2433-2437.
Kirchner C, Liedl T, Kudera S, Pellegrino T, Javier AM, Gaub HE, et al. 2005. Cytotoxicity of
colloidal CdSe and CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles. Nano Letters 5(2):331-338. Kopelevich DI, Bonzongo JC, Gao J, Tasseff RA, Ban Y-M, Bitton G. 2008. Potential toxicity
of fullerenes and molecular modeling of their transport across lipid membranes. In: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Environmental and Health Impact.
Kovochich M, Xia T, Xu J, Yeh JI, Nel AE. 2007. Principles and procedures to assess
nanomaterial toxicity. In: Environmental nanotechnology: Applications and impacts of nanomaterials (Wiesner MR, Bottero JY, eds). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
Koyama S, Endo M, Kim YA, Hayashi T, Yanagisawa T, Osaka K, et al. 2006. Role of systemic
T-cells and histopathological aspects after subcutaneous implantation of various carbon nanotubes in mice. Carbon 44(6):1079-1092.
Kramer KJM, Jak RG, van Hattum B, Hooftman RN, Zwolsman JJG. 2004. Copper toxicity in
relation to surface water-dissolved organic matter: Biological effects to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 23(12):2971-2980.
Krusic PJ, Wasserman E, Keizer PN, Morton JR, Preston KF. 1991. Radical Reactions of C60.
Science 254(5035):1183-1185. Kung HH, Kung MC. 2004. Nanotechnology: applications and potentials for heterogeneous
catalysis. Catal Today 97(4):219-224. Lanone S, Boczkowski J. 2006. Biomedical applications and potential health risks of
nanomaterials: Molecular mechanisms. Current Molecular Medicine 6(6):651-663. Leal MFC, Van den Berg CMG. 1998. Evidence for strong copper(I) complexation by organic
ligands in seawater. Aquat Geochem 4(1):49-75. Lecoanet HF, Bottero JY, Wiesner MR. 2004. Laboratory assessment of the mobility of
nanomaterials in porous media. Environmental Science & Technology 38(19):5164-5169. Lecoanet HF, Wiesner MR. 2004. Velocity effects on fullerene and oxide nanoparticle
deposition in porous media. Environmental Science & Technology 38(16):4377-4382.
125
Lee DY, Fortin C, Campbell PGC. 2005. Contrasting effects of chloride on the toxicity of silver to two green algae, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquat Toxicol 75(2):127-135.
Lee J, Kim JH. 2008. Effect of encapsulating agents on dispersion status and photochemical
reactivity of C60 in the aqueous phase. Environmental Science & Technology 42(5):1552-1557.
Lendvay JM, Adriaens P. 1999. Laboratory evaluation of temporal trends in biogeochemical
conditions at a groundwater-surface water interface. Phys Chem Earth Pt B 24(6):511-516.
Li L, Fan MH, Brown RC, Van Leeuwen JH, Wang JJ, Wang WH, et al. 2006. Synthesis,
properties, and environmental applications of nanoscale iron-based materials: A review. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 36(5):405-431.
Liang JG, He ZK, Zhang SS, Huang S, Ai XP, Yang HX, et al. 2007. Study on DNA damage
induced by CdSe quantum dots using nucleic acid molecular "light switches" as probe. Talanta 71(4):1675-1678.
Lide DR, Frederikse HPR. 1997. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics:CRC-Press. Limbach LK, Wick P, Manser P, Grass RN, Bruinink A, Stark WJ. 2007. Exposure of
engineered nanoparticles to human lung epithelial cells: Influence of chemical composition and catalytic activity on oxidative stress. Environmental Science & Technology 41(11):4158-4163.
Lin AMY, Chyi BY, Wang SD, Yu HH, Kanakamma PP, Luh TY, et al. 1999. Carboxyfullerene
prevents iron-induced oxidative stress in rat brain. Journal of Neurochemistry 72(4):1634-1640.
Lindberg RD, Runnells DD. 1984. Groundwater Redox Reactions - an Analysis of Equilibrium
State Applied to Eh Measurements and Geochemical Modeling. Science 225(4665):925-927.
Liu RQ, Zhao DY. 2007. Reducing leachability and bioaccessibilty of lead in soils using a new
class of stabilized iron phosphate nanoparticles. Water Res 41(12):2491-2502. Liu XY, Gurel V, Morris D, Murray DW, Zhitkovich A, Kane AB, et al. 2007. Bioavailability of
nickel in single-wall carbon nanotubes. Adv Mater 19(19):2790-2796. Lok CN, Ho CM, Chen R, He QY, Yu WY, Sun H, et al. 2007. Silver nanoparticles: partial
oxidation and antibacterial activities. J Biol Inorg Chem 12(4):527-534.
126
Lok CN, Ho CM, Chen R, He QY, Yu WY, Sun HZ, et al. 2006. Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. Journal of Proteome Research 5(4):916-924.
Long TC, Tajuba J, Sama P, Saleh N, Swartz C, Parker J, et al. 2007. Nanosize titanium dioxide
stimulates reactive oxygen species in brain microglia and damages neurons in vitro. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(11):1631-1637.
Lovern SB, Klaper R. 2006. Daphnia magna mortality when exposed to titanium dioxide and
fullerene (C60) nanoparticles. Environ Toxicol Chem 25(4):1132-1137. Lovern SB, Strickler JR, Klaper R. 2007. Behavioral and physiological changes in Daphnia
magna when exposed to nanoparticle suspensions (titanium dioxide, nano-C60, and C(60)HxC(70)Hx). Environmental Science & Technology 41(12):4465-4470.
Lovley DR, Chapelle FH, Woodward JC. 1994. Use of Dissolved H2 Concentrations to
Determine the Distribution of Microbially Catalyzed Redox Reactions in Anoxic Groundwater. Environmental Science & Technology 28(7):1205-1210.
Lovley DR, Goodwin S. 1988. Hydrogen Concentrations as an Indicator of the Predominant
Terminal Electron-Accepting Reactions in Aquatic Sediments. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta 52(12):2993-3003.
Lu CY, Liu CT. 2006. Removal of nickel(II) from aqueous solution by carbon nanotubes. J
Chem Technol Biot 81(12):1932-1940. Lyon D, Thill A, Rose J, Alvarez PJJ. 2007. Ecotoxicological impacts of nanomaterials. In:
Environmental nanotechnology: Applications and impacts of nanomaterials (Wiesner MR, Bottero JY, eds). New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
Lyon DY, Adams LK, Falkner JC, Alvarez PJJ. 2006. Antibacterial activity of fullerene water
suspensions: Effects of preparation method and particle size. Environmental Science & Technology 40(14):4360-4366.
Lyon DY, Fortner JD, Sayes CM, Colvin VL, Hughes JB. 2005. Bacterial cell association and
antimicrobial activity of a C60 water suspension. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(11):2757-2762.
Manna SK, Sarkar S, Barr J, Wise K, Barrera EV, Jejelowo O, et al. 2005. Single-walled carbon
nanotube induces oxidative stress and activates nuclear transcription factor-kappa B in human keratinocytes. Nano Letters 5(9):1676-1684.
Markovic Z, Todorovic-Markovic B, Kleut D, Nikolic N, Vranjes-Djuric S, Misirkic M, et al.
2007. The mechanism of cell-damaging reactive oxygen generation by colloidal fullerenes. Biomaterials 28(36):5437-5448.
127
Masciangioli T, Zhang WX. 2003. Environmental technologies at the nanoscale. Environmental Science & Technology 37(5):102A-108A.
Matarredona O, Rhoads H, Li ZR, Harwell JH, Balzano L, Resasco DE. 2003. Dispersion of
single-walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous solutions of the anionic surfactant NaDDBS. J Phys Chem B 107(48):13357-13367.
Mayer ABR, Johnson RW, Hausner SH, Mark JE. 1999. Colloidal silver nanoparticles protected
by water-soluble nonionic polymers and "soft" polyacids. J Macromol Sci Pure A36(10):1427-1441.
McGuire JT, Smith EW, Long DT, Hyndman DW, Haack SK, Klug MJ, et al. 2000. Temporal
variations in parameters reflecting terminal-electron-accepting processes in an aquifer contaminated with waste fuel and chlorinated solvents. Chem Geol 169(3-4):471-485.
Meng H, Chen Z, Xing GM, Yuan H, Chen CY, Zhao F, et al. 2007. Ultrahigh reactivity
provokes nanotoxicity: Explanation of oral toxicity of nano-copper particles. Toxicology Letters 175(1-3):102-110.
Mitchell CA, Krishnamoorti R. 2007. Dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes in
poly(epsilon-caprolactone). Macromolecules 40(5):1538-1545. Mitoraj D, Janczyk A, Strus M, Kisch H, Stochel G, Heczko PB, et al. 2007. Visible light
inactivation of bacteria and fungi by modified titanium dioxide. Photoch Photobio Sci 6(6):642-648.
Miyawaki J, Yudasaka M, Azami T, Kubo Y, Iijima S. 2008. Toxicity of single-walled carbon
nanohorns. Acs Nano 2(2):213-226. Monteiro-Riviere NA, Orsière T. 2007. Toxicological impacts of nanomaterials. In:
Environmental nanotechnology: Applications and impacts of nanomaterials (Wiesner MR, Bottero JY, eds). New York, NY, USA:McGraw-Hill.
Morgan TP, Guadagnolo CM, Grosell M, Wood CM. 2005. Effects of water hardness on the
physiological responses to chronic waterborne silver exposure in early life stages of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat Toxicol 74(4):333-350.
Mucalo MR, Bullen CR, Manley-Harris M, McIntire TM. 2002. Arabinogalactan from the
Western larch tree: A new, purified and highly water-soluble polysaccharide-based protecting agent for maintaining precious metal nanoparticles in colloidal suspension. Journal of Materials Science 37(3):493-504.
Navalakhe RM, Nandedkar TD. 2007. Application of nanotechnology in biomedicine. Indian J
Exp Biol 45(2):160-165.
128
Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761):622-627.
Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods
of soil analysis (Sparks DL, ed). Madison, Wisconsin:Soil Science Society of America, Inc., American Society of Agronomy, Inc., 961-1010.
Nyberg L, Turco RF, Nies L. 2008. Assessing the impact of nanomaterials on anaerobic
microbial communities. Environmental Science & Technology 42(6):1938-1943. Oberdorster E. 2004. Manufactured nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C60) induce oxidative stress in the
brain of juvenile largemouth bass. Environmental Health Perspectives 112(10):1058-1062.
Oberdorster E, Zhu SQ, Blickley TM, McClellan-Green P, Haasch ML. 2006. Ecotoxicology of
carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: Effects of fullerene (C60) on aquatic organisms. Carbon 44(6):1112-1120.
Oberdorster G. 2000. Toxicology of ultrafine particles: in vivo studies. Philos T Roy Soc A
358(1775):2719-2739. Oberdörster G, Maynard A, Donaldson K, Gastranova V, Fitzpatrick J, Ausman K, et al. 2005.
Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2:8.
Papis E, Gornati R, Prati M, Ponti J, Sabbioni E, Bernardini G. 2007. Gene expression in
nanotoxicology research: Analysis by differential display in BALB3T3 fibroblasts exposed to cobalt particles and ions. Toxicology Letters 170(3):185-192.
Parker JC, Vangenuchten MT. 1984. Determining Transport Parameters from Laboratory and
Field Tracer Experiments. Va Agr Exp Stat B(84-3):1-96. Pastoriza-Santos I, Liz-Marzán L. 2002. Formation of PVP-protected metal nanoparticles in
DMF. Langmuir 18:2888-2894. Perez P, Estevez-Blanco P, Beiras R, Fernandez E. 2006. Effect of copper on the photochemical
efficiency, growth, and chlorophyll a biomass of natural phytoplankton assemblages. Environ Toxicol Chem 25(1):137-143.
Picatonotto T, Vione D, Carlotti ME, Gallarate M. 2001. Photocatalytic activity of inorganic
sunscreens. J Disper Sci Technol 22(4):381-386. Pieper AP, Ryan JN, Harvey RW, Amy GL, Illangasekare TH, Metge DW. 1997. Transport and
recovery of bacteriophage PRD1 in a sand and gravel aquifer: Effect of sewage-derived organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology 31(4):1163-1170.
129
Pitoniak E, Wu CY, Londeree D, Mazyck D, Bonzongo JC, Powers K, et al. 2003. Nanostructured silica-gel doped with TiO2 for mercury vapor control. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5(3-4):281-292.
Pitoniak E, Wu CY, Mazyck DW, Powers KW, Sigmund W. 2005. Adsorption enhancement
mechanisms of silica-titania nanocomposites for elemental mercury vapor removal. Environmental Science & Technology 39(5):1269-1274.
Priya BR, Byrne HJ. 2008. Investigation of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate assisted
dispersion and debundling of single-wall carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 112(2):332-337.
Pulskamp K, Diabate S, Krug HF. 2007. Carbon nanotubes show no sign of acute toxicity but
induce intracellular reactive oxygen species in dependence on contaminants. Toxicology Letters 168(1):58-74.
Radehaus PM. 1997. Microbiologically mediated reactions in aquatic systems. In: Perspectives
in Environmental Chemistry (Macalady DL, ed). New York:Oxford University Press, Inc. Rameshbabu N, Kumar TSS, Prabhakar TG, Sastry VS, Murty KVGK, Rao KP. 2007.
Antibacterial nanosized silver substituted hydroxyapatite: Synthesis and characterization. J Biomed Mater Res A 80A(3):581-591.
Richards JG, Curtis PJ, Burnison BK, Playle RC. 2001. Effects of natural organic matter source
on reducing metal toxicity to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and on metal binding to their gills. Environ Toxicol Chem 20(6):1159-1166.
Roberts AP, Mount AS, Seda B, Souther J, Qiao R, Lin SJ, et al. 2007. In vivo biomodification
of lipid-coated carbon nanotubes by Daphnia magna. Environmental Science & Technology 41(8):3025-3029.
Roco MC. 2005. Environmentally responsible development of nanotechnology. Environmental
Science & Technology 39(5):106A-112A. Roco MC, Williams S, Alivisatos P. 1999. Nanotechnology research directions: IWGN
workshop report. International Technology Research Institute World Technology (WTEC) DivisionR.
Rodgers JH, Deaver E, Rogers PL. 1997. Partitioning and effects of silver in amended freshwater
sediments. Ecotox Environ Safe 37(1):1-9. Ruoff RS, Tse DS, Malhotra R, Lorents DC. 1993. Solubility of C60 in a Variety of Solvents. J
Phys Chem-Us 97(13):3379-3383. Rutherglen C, Burke P. 2007. Carbon nanotube radio. Nano Letters 7(11):3296-3299.
130
Ryan AC, Van Genderen EJ, Tomasso JR, Klaine SJ. 2004. Influence of natural organic matter source on copper toxicity to larval fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas): Implications for the biotic ligand model. Environ Toxicol Chem 23(6):1567-1574.
Sayes CM, Fortner JD, Guo W, Lyon D, Boyd AM, Ausman KD, et al. 2004. The differential
cytotoxicity of water-soluble fullerenes. Nano Letters 4(10):1881-1887. Sayes CM, Gobin AM, Ausman KD, Mendez J, West JL, Colvin VL. 2005. Nano-C60
cytotoxicity is due to lipid peroxidation. Biomaterials 26(36):7587-7595. Schijven JF, Hassanizadeh SM. 2000. Removal of viruses by soil passage: Overview of
modeling, processes, and parameters. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 30(1):49-127. Schrick B, Hydutsky BW, Blough JL, Mallouk TE. 2004. Delivery vehicles for zerovalent metal
nanoparticles in soil and groundwater. Chemistry of Materials 16(11):2187-2193. Schwartz ML, Curtis PJ, Playle RC. 2004. Influence of natural organic matter source on acute
copper, lead, and cadmium toxicity to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Environ Toxicol Chem 23(12):2889-2899.
Sciera KL, Isely JJ, Tomasso JR, Klaine SJ. 2004. Influence of multiple water-quality
characteristics on copper toxicity to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem 23(12):2900-2905.
Seetharam RN, Sridhar KR. 2007. Nanotoxicity: Threat posed by nanoparticles. Curr Sci India
93(6):769-770. Shvedova AA, Castranova V, Kisin ER, Schwegler-Berry D, Murray AR, Gandelsman VZ, et al.
2003. Exposure to carbon nanotube material: Assessment of nanotube cytotoxicity using human keratinocyte cells. J Toxicol Env Heal A 66(20):1909-1926.
Shvedova AA, Kisin ER, Mercer R, Murray AR, Johnson VJ, Potapovich AI, et al. 2005.
Unusual inflammatory and fibrogenic pulmonary responses to single-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Am J Physiol-Lung C 289(5):L698-L708.
Smith CJ, Shaw BJ, Handy RD. 2007. Toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes to rainbow
trout, (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Respiratory toxicity, organ pathologies, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol 82(2):94-109.
Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. 2004. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E-
coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 275(1):177-182.
Soto K, Garza KM, Murr LE. 2007. Cytotoxic effects of aggregated nanomaterials. Acta
Biomater 3(3):351-358.
131
Soto KF, Carrasco A, Powell TG, Garza KM, Murr LE. 2005. Comparative in vitro cytotoxicity assessment of some manufactured nanoparticulate materials characterized by transmission electron microscopy. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7(2):145-169.
Stoimenov PK, Klinger RL, Marchin GL, Klabunde KJ. 2002. Metal oxide nanoparticles as
bactericidal agents. Langmuir 18(17):6679-6686. Tang YJJ, Ashcroft JM, Chen D, Min GW, Kim CH, Murkhejee B, et al. 2007. Charge-
associated effects of fullerene derivatives on microbial structural integrity and central metabolism. Nano Letters 7(3):754-760.
Templeton RC, Ferguson PL, Washburn KM, Scrivens WA, Chandler GT. 2006. Life-cycle
effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) on an estuarine meiobenthic copepod. Environmental Science & Technology 40(23):7387-7393.
Tetley TD. 2007. Health effects of nanomaterials. Biochemical Society Transactions 35:527-531. Thorstenson DC. 1984. Open file report No 84-072 (Survey UG, ed), 45. Tian FR, Cui DX, Schwarz H, Estrada GG, Kobayashi H. 2006. Cytotoxicity of single-wall
carbon nanotubes on human fibroblasts. Toxicology in Vitro 20(7):1202-1212. Toensmeier PA. 2004. Nanotechnology faces scrutiny over environment and toxicity. Plast Eng
60(11):14-17. Tong ZH, Bischoff M, Nies L, Applegate B, Turco RF. 2007. Impact of fullerene (C60) on a soil
microbial community. Environmental Science & Technology 41(8):2985-2991. Toride N, Leij FJ, van Genuchten MT. 1999. The CXTFIT code for estimating transport
parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments. Version 2.1. Research Report, vol. 137. (US Salinity Laboratory ARS, US Department of Agriculture, Riverside, California, ed), 119.
Tungittiplakorn W, Lion LW, Cohen C, Kim JY. 2004. Engineered polymeric nanoparticles for
soil remediation. Environmental Science & Technology 38(5):1605-1610. USDA. 1992. Soil Survey Laboratoty Methods Manual. Washington, D.C. Usenko CY, Harper SL, Tanguay RL. 2007. In vivo evaluation of carbon fullerene toxicity using
embryonic zebrafish. Carbon 45(9):1891-1898. USEPA. 1996. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. Washington, D.C. USEPA. 2002. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving
waters to freshwater organisms.
132
USEPA. 2004. Method 9045D: soil and waste pH. Washington, D.C. Van Stempvoort DR, Lesage S, Novakowski KS, Millar K, Brown S, Lawrence JR. 2002. Humic
acid enhanced remediation of an emplaced diesel source in groundwater. 1. Laboratory-based pilot scale test. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 54(3-4):249-276.
VanGenderen EJ, Ryan AC, Tomasso JR, Klaine SJ. 2003. Influence of dissolved organic matter
source on silver toxicity to Pimephales promelas. Environ Toxicol Chem 22(11):2746-2751.
Vasconcelos MTSD, Azenha MAO, Cabral JPS. 1997. Comparison of availability of copper(II)
complexes with organic ligands to bacterial cells and to chitin. Environ Toxicol Chem 16(10):2029-2039.
Vidales-Contreras JA, Gerba CP, Karpiscak MM, Acuna-Askar K, Chaidez-Quiroz C. 2006.
Transport of coliphage PRD1 in a surface flow constructed wetland. Water Environ Res 78(11):2253-2260.
Walkley A, Black IA. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil
organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1):29-38.
Wall K, Pang L, Sinton L, Close M. 2008. Transport and attenuation of microbial tracers and
effluent microorganisms in saturated pumice sand aquifer material. Water Air and Soil Pollution 188(1-4):213-224.
Wang CB, Zhang WX. 1997. Synthesizing nanoscale iron particles for rapid and complete
dechlorination of TCE and PCBs. Environmental Science & Technology 31(7):2154-2156.
Wang H, Zhou W, Ho DL, Winey KI, Fischer JE, Glinka CJ, et al. 2004. Dispersing single-
walled carbon nanotubes with surfactants: A small angle neutron scattering study. Nano Letters 4(9):1789-1793.
Wang HB, DeSousa R, Gasa J, Tasaki K, Stucky G, Jousselme B, et al. 2007. Fabrication of new
fullerene composite membranes and their application in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J Membrane Sci 289(1-2):277-283.
Wang IC, Tai LA, Lee DD, Kanakamma PP, Shen CKF, Luh TY, et al. 1999. C60 and water-
soluble fullerene derivatives as antioxidants against radical-initiated lipid peroxidation. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 42(22):4614-4620.
Wang SH, Hou WS, Wei LQ, Jia HS, Liu XG, Xu BS. 2007. Antibacterial activity of nano-SiO2
antibacterial agent grafted on wool surface. Surface & Coatings Technology 202(3):460-465.
133
Wang X, Yang LL, Chen Z, Shin DM. 2008. Application of nanotechnology in cancer therapy and imaging. Ca-Cancer J Clin 58(2):97-110.
Warheit DB. 2008. How meaningful are the results of nanotoxicity studies in the absence of
adequate material characterization? Toxicological Sciences 101(2):183-185. Warner KA, Roden EE, Bonzongo JC. 2003. Microbial mercury transformation in anoxic
freshwater sediments under iron-reducing and other electron-accepting conditions. Environmental Science & Technology 37(10):2159-2165.
Wei QS, Ji J, Fu JH, Shen JC. 2007. Norvancomycin-capped silver nanoparticles: Synthesis and
antibacterial activities against E-coli. Sci China Ser B 50(3):418-424. Wen LS, Santschi P, Gill G, Paternostro C. 1999. Estuarine trace metal distributions in
Galveston Bay: importance of colloidal forms in the speciation of the dissolved phase. Mar Chem 63(3-4):185-212.
Wick P, Manser P, Limbach LK, Dettlaff-Weglikowska U, Krumeich F, Roth S, et al. 2007. The
degree and kind of agglomeration affect carbon nanotube cytotoxicity. Toxicology Letters 168(2):121-131.
Wiesner MR. 2003. Environmental implications of nanotechnologies. Environmental
Engineering:8-11. Xie SY, Ma ZJ, Wang CF, Lin SC, Jiang ZY, Huang RB, et al. 2004. Preparation and self-
assembly of copper nanoparticles via discharge of copper rod electrodes in a surfactant solution: a combination of physical and chemical processes. J Solid State Chem 177(10):3743-3747.
Xu XHN, Brownlow WJ, Kyriacou SV, Wan Q, Viola JJ. 2004. Real-time probing of membrane
transport in living microbial cells using single nanoparticle optics and living cell imaging. Biochemistry-Us 43(32):10400-10413.
Yamakoshi Y, Umezawa N, Ryu A, Arakane K, Miyata N, Goda Y, et al. 2003. Active oxygen
species generated from photoexcited fullerene (C60) as potential medicines: O2-· versus
1O2. Journal of the American Chemical Society 125(42):12803-12809. Yamakoshi YN, Yagami T, Fukuhara K, Sueyoshi S, Miyata N. 1994. Solubilization of
Fullerenes into Water with Polyvinylpyrrolidone Applicable to Biological Tests. J Chem Soc Chem Comm(4):517-518.
Yogeswaran U, Chen SM. 2008. A review on the electrochemical sensors and biosensors
composed of nanowires as sensing material. Sensors-Basel 8(1):290-313. Yoon KY, Byeon JH, Park JH, Hwang J. 2007. Susceptibility constants of Escherichia coli and
Bacillus subtilis to silver and copper nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ 373(2-3):572-575.
134
Yoshida K, Tanagawa M, Atsuta M. 1999. Characterization and inhibitory effect of antibacterial dental resin composites incorporating silver-supported materials. J Biomed Mater Res 47(4):516-522.
Yu DG. 2007. Formation of colloidal silver nanoparticles stabilized by Na+-poly(gamma-
glutamic acid)-silver nitrate complex via chemical reduction process. Colloid Surface B 59(2):171-178.
Zajtchuk R. 1999. New technologies in medicine: Biotechnology and nanotechnology. Dm-Dis
Mon 45(11):453-495. Zhang M, Yudasaka M, Miyawaki J, Fan J, Iijima S. 2005. Isolating single-wall carbon
nanohorns as small aggregates through a dispersion method. J Phys Chem B 109(47):22201-22204.
Zhang TT, Stilwell JL, Gerion D, Ding LH, Elboudwarej O, Cooke PA, et al. 2006. Cellular
effect of high doses of silica-coated quantum dot profiled with high throughput gene expression analysis and high content cellomics measurements. Nano Letters 6(4):800-808.
Zhang WX, Karn B. 2005. Nanoscale environmental science and technology: Challenges and
opportunities. Environmental Science & Technology 39(5):94A-95A. Zhou Q, Fan Q, Zhuang Y, Li Y, Zhao G, Zheng JW. 2006. Effect of substrate on surface-
enhanced Raman scattering of molecules adsorbed on immobilized silver nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 110(24):12029-12033.
Zhu SQ, Oberdorster E, Haasch ML. 2006. Toxicity of an engineered nanoparticle (fullerene,
C60) in two aquatic species, Daphnia and fathead minnow. Marine Environmental Research 62:S5-S9.
Zhuang J, Jin Y. 2003. Virus retention and transport as influenced by different forms of soil
organic matter. Journal of Environmental Quality 32(3):816-823.
135
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Jie Gao was born in Huaian, Jiangsu Province, China. She received her bachelor’s degree
in environmental science from Nanjing University in 2003. After one year study in Beijing
University graduate school, Jie Gao was admitted as a PhD student with an Alumni Fellowship
award in the Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences at the University of Florida.
She received Master’s degree in 2005 and has been ever since working on her doctoral research
in assessment of environmental impacts of nanomaterials under the supervisory of Dr. Jean-
Claude Bonzongo.