A STUDY ON
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND SATISFACTION:
A COMPARISON OF RETAIL STORES AND KIRYANA SHOPS
SUBMITTED IN THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF MASTERS IN BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION.
(PTU 2009-2011)
Under Supervision Of
Mr Pranjal
GJIMT
Submitted By:
Ankur Gulbadhar
MBA 4th Semester
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It gives me immense pleasure, to express my unfeigned and sincere thanks and gratitude
to my supervisor Mr.Pranjal for his valuable guidance sustained, encouragement and
constructive critic at every stage of work, without which it would have never been
accomplished.
I acknowledge with thanks the cooperation and help received from the management of
retail outlets. I thank them for providing me with the opportunity to converse with the
customers of their outlets and gather relevant data and other information.
I acknowledge with thanks the unsolicited cooperation and help provided by the
department, library and administrative staff of Gian Jyoti Institue of management and
technology Mohali
I owe special thanks for the help and support received from the faculty of department and
colleagues.
Ankur Gulbadhar
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
This is to certify that the Final Project report entitled “A STUDY ON
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND SATISFACTION: A COMPARISON OF RETAIL
STORES AND KIRYANA SHOPS ” Submitted to Punjab technical university in the
partial fulfillment of the requirement for degree of MBA, is a work carried out by Ankur
Gulbadhar Under my supervision and guidance.
Project Guide:
Mr.Pranjal
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that the Major Project Report, which is entitled “A STUDY ON
CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND SATISFACTION: A COMPARISON OF RETAIL
STORES AND KIRYANA SHOPS” is Compiled and submitted by me is my original
frame work. I have not copied the data from any previous report. However, my Project
Guide Mr. Pranjal helped me at various points while preparing this report.
Ankur Gulbadhar
LIST OF TABLES
4.1 T-Test Group Statistics 56-60
4.2 Independent sample tests 61
4.3 Reason to go to retail store 62
4.4 Reason to go kiryana store 63
LIST OF GRAPHS
Graph No. Graph Name Page No.
4.1 Gender 48
4.2 Age 48
4.3 Occupation 49
4.4 Income 49
4.5 Age and Store Type 50
4.6 Gender and Store Type 50
4.7 Occupation and Store Type 51
4.8 Income and store type 51
4.9 Awareness level 52
4.10 Visited once 53
4.11 Visit in last two times 54
5
Executive Summary
This study titled “Study on consumer behavior and satisfaction: a comparison of retail
stores and kiryana shops” was carried out to have an understanding of the consumer
perception pertaining to the Retail Stores (Organized Retail) vis-à-vis Kiryana Stores
(Unorganized Retail) and to analyze the important determinants of store choice.
Further it was seen from the results and final findings that different variables that influence
the choice of stores. Among the governing factors, General Store Attributes Dimension,
Appearance Related Dimension, Salesperson Service Dimension, Physical Aspects,
Reliability, Personal Interaction, Problem Solving, Policy, Location, Convenience of
Shopping, Sales Personnel Service are statistically significant.
During project I covered mohali city and find out the major competitors of Spencer like
Reliance fresh, 6-Ten, and other unorganized stores like kiryana stores like Amrit
Confectioners, Sital departmental store, H.S. departmental store, gill store, P.D.store and then
try to find out the reason why people go over there and I basically took 10 factors on which
they rank the reason to retail store and kiryana store differently and then try to find the
satifaction level of the customer towards product range, cleanliness, prices, discount provided
by the retail and kiryana stores .
I came with major finding that young generation people prefer more to retail stores rather
than old people and in this fast growing competition we do not have enough time to go to
store buy themselves and so people prefer home delivery more which is provided by kiryana
stores
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3
List of Tables 4
List of Graphs 4
Executive Summary 5
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………..
1.1 INTRODUCTION-INDIAN PERSPECTIVE ……………………………….9
1.1.1 Retail in India: Room for Everyone……………………………….. 16
1.1.2 Retail Formats………………………………………………………..19
1.1.3 Retail Market Trends ………………………………………………26
1.1.4 Potential Roadblocks to the Retail Growth Story………………. 28
1.1.5 Urban Vs Rural Retail Trends……………………………………..29
1.1.6 SWOT Analysis………………………………………………………32
1.1.7Conclusion………………………………………………………34
CHAPTER 2:
2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………35
2.2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY…………………………………39
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY……………………………………41
3.1 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES……………………………………………..42
3.2 PROBLEM DEFINITION………………………………………………..43
3.3 RESEARCH DESIGN……………………………………………………43
3.4 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION……………………………………45
3.5 SAMPLING…………………………………………………………………45
7
3.6 STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES USED………………………………………46
3.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY……………………………………………46
CHAPTER 4: DATA INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS……………………48
4.1 RESPONDENTS PROFILE……………………………………………49
4.2 Z- TEST…………………………………………………………………56
CHAPTER 5: FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS …………………………………64
5.1 FINDINGS ………………………………………………………………65
5.2 SUGGESTIONS……………………………………………………………67
5.3 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH……………………………..68
References………………………………………………………………………………69
Annexures
Annexure A: Questionnaire……………………………………………………71
8
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
9
10
1.1 INTRODUCTION-INDIAN PERSPECTIVE
“After leading the IT bandwagon, India is poised to grow as a retail hub. It is
imperative to sustain the modernization of the retail sector and dispel the myth that the game
is big vs. small or traditional vs. modern or organized vs. unorganized or local vs. foreign.
What is needed is to create an appropriate environment to propel retail.”,
That aptly sums up the importance the retail sector has assumed in India’s economic scenario
today.
Retail is seen as the next booming industry after IT. The Indian retail market is the fifth
largest retail destination globally. It was ranked second after Vietnam as the most attractive
emerging market for investment in the retail sector by AT Kearney's seventh annual Global
Retail Development Index (GRDI), in 2008.
A report by global consultancy firm, AT Kearney said "The consumer spending in India has
increased by an impressive 75 per cent in the last four years and will quadruple in the next 20
years." Moreover, India recently topped the Nielsen Global Consumer Confidence study,
conducted by Nielsen, a market research company.
Retailing in India can be classified under two broad headings: Organized and unorganized
currently, the size of Indian retail sector is US$ 328 billion with unorganized retail
accounting for a lion’s share of the market. Organized retailing contributes to roughly around
4% of the whole market. The top ten cities account for 96% of total organized retail, of
which the top six cater to 82%.
The rise in the disposable income of the Indian consumer is driving the revolution of the
Indian retail industry. Indian retailing industry has seen phenomenal growth in the last five
years. Organized retailing has finally emerged from the shadows of unorganized retailing and
is contributing significantly in the growth of Indian retail sector.
11
The growth in Indian retailing is likely to rest on key determinants such as (i) Government
policy, (ii) Infrastructure development, (iii) GDP growth, (iv) Employment scenario and (v)
Changes in the retailing supply chain.
The share of organized retail is expected to rise significantly because more than $30 billion
of investment is being planned by both domestic and foreign players in retail space in the
coming five to seven years.
As per estimates, 92% of these investments are slated for urban areas whereas 8% for rural.
Of the urban investments, majority share of investments is slated for the hypermarket (38%)
and supermarket (21%) formats while 62% of urban investments are expected to go to A-type
or above cities. A break-up of expected urban investments in different formats and cities is
given below in Table 1:
12
Table 1: Format-wise urban investments in retail expected in next 5 years
Format %Share
Hypermarket 38
Supermarket 28
Specialty Store 22
Cash n Carry 16
Department Stores 2
Source: FICCI Retail Report 2007
Source: FICCI Retail Report 2007
With roughly 60 percent of the total population below 30 years of age, favorable
demographics are expected to drive consumption across categories. The purchasing power of
a young consuming middle class has been talked of considerably since the time of economic
liberalization in 1991. Also, the growth in the income amongst the Indian households has
been on an increase witnessing a significant growth of 3.7% for the middle income
households during 2002-06. Also depicted in Figure1 is the increasing number of working
women population across the major cities of the country. This trends points toward
increasing number of dual income households which further leads to increased purchasing
power of the consumers
13
Figure 1
Figure 2
Source: NSSO; AC Nielsen; IRS-2002; KPMG Analysis
14
With various factors impacting growth in retail, some segments are bound to grow faster than
others. For instance, increasing affluence is driving growth in the watches and jewelry
segment, while awareness of health is driving growth in lifestyle pharmaceuticals. However,
food and grocery is expected to see the highest growth with clothing emerging as the second
fastest growing segment. Despite Food and Grocery being the fastest growing retail segment
in India today, only 8% of it is in the organized retail segment, which offers a huge
opportunity for malls to exploit. Presently, this segment is being catered to by the
unorganized players, notably the kiryana stores.
Figure 3
Source: FICCI – KPMG Retail Survey, 2005
15
According to the recent report by McKinsey & Company titled 'The Great Indian Bazaar,
Organized Retail Comes of Age in India', India's overall retail sector is likely to grow to US$
450 billion by 2015. Another McKinsey report 'The rise of Indian Consumer Market',
estimates that the Indian consumer market is likely to grow four times by 2025.
Retailing consists of all activities involved in selling goods or services directly to final
consumers for personal, non-business use. A retailer or retail store is any business enterprise
whose sales volume comes primarily from retailing.” Retail is India's largest industry,
accounting for over 10 per cent of the country's GDP and around eight per cent of the
employment. Retail industry in India is at the crossroads. It has emerged as one of the most
dynamic and fast paced industries with several players entering the market.
The presence of 15million kiryana stores brings into light the very fact that the Indian retail
industry is highly fragmented/ unorganized. Retailing in India is gradually inching its way
toward becoming the next boom industry, organized retailing in particular. The whole
concept of shopping has altered in terms of format and consumer buying behavior, ushering
in a revolution in shopping in India. Modern retail has entered India as seen in sprawling
shopping centers, multi-storied malls and huge complexes offer shopping, entertainment and
food all under one roof.
The future of Indian retailing may even witness the concept of 24 hour retailing. Although
this concept has been in existence in few retail segments like pharmaceuticals and fuel, it still
remains to be a challenge for other segments like food and groceries, apparel etc to adopt this
trend.
Although the organized retailing in India is coming up in a big way, it cannot simply ignore
the competition from the conventional stores because of various factors like reach, extending
credit facility and other intangible factors like the human touch which are provided only by
the conventional stores.
The urban retail market has been adopting various new formats and the malls turned out to be
the trend setters by promising the concept of shoppertainment. The trends in the rural market
also have been changing from the old Haats and Melas to the rural malls like ‘Chaupal Sagar’
16
launched by ITC, DCM Shriram Groups one-stop shopping destination called ‘Hariyali
Bazaar’, Godrej groups agri store ‘Adhar’ etc.
1.1.1 RETAIL IN INDIA: ROOM FOR EVERYONE
Evolution:
Historical Indian retail market consisted of weekly markets, village fairs and melas and the
19th century gave birth to the retail outlets in the form of convenience stores, Mom and Pop
stores/ kiryana stores. This helped the consumers on to stick to a particular store for their day
to day requirements and also avail the credit purchasing facility. And in the 1980’s people
have seen the new formats like supermarket, departmental stores and discount stores entering
into the Indian retail space. In less than a decade hypermarkets have gained all the applause
of the retail market and stood above all the other formats by bringing in the concept of “one
stop shopping.” This stood as an opening door for the new generation of the retail industry.
And very soon the malls became the trend setters in the new millennium.
This has coined the term of ‘shopper-tainment’ (shopping and entertainment) which can be
attributed to the changing life styles of the people.
17
Figure 4: Evolution of the Indian Retail Market
The above given diagram is the pictorial representation which depicts the evolution of the
Indian retail market formats based on their category and value proposition. And a brief
description above formats based on some of the parameters like their offerings, space
occupied etc. is also given below for better understanding.
In recent times, sweeping changes have affected both the supply and the demand fronts of the
market. Customer spending as well as brand consciousness has been increasing substantially.
Also, they have started demanding a better shopping experience. To tap increasing potential
of the Indian consumers, a large number of corporate have entered the retail arena. These
include large Indian business groups such as the Tatas, RPG, Rahejas, Piramal,
Reliance,Bharti and Birlas as well as MNC brands in apparel, footwear and durables. The
entry into retailing by MNC brands has driven the growth of specialty chains and upgraded
the standards of existing multi-brand outlets.
The established players in the organized retail sector are: (i) RPG Group, (ii) K Raheja
Group; (iii) R Raheja Group; (iv) Tata Group; (v) Pantaloon Retail Ltd; (vi) Landmark
Weekly MarketsVillage FairsMelas
Convenience StoresMom and Pop/Kiryanas
PDS OutletsKhadi StoresCooperatives
Exclusive Brand OutletsHyper/Super MarketsDepartment StoresShopping Malls
Traditional/Pervasive Reach
Government Supported
Historic/Rural Reach
Modern Formats/ International
Source of Entertainme
nt
Neighborhood Stores/Convenienc
e
Availability/ Low Costs / Distribution
Shopping Experience/Efficien
cy
18
Group; and (vii) Piramal Enterprise. The more recent entrants are Reliance, Bharti and Birlas
who have rolled out large investment plans for this sector.
Apart from these there are retailers like Viswapriya Group, DS Group, Nilgiris, etc. that have
been very successful in the different business formats in retailing.
Franchising arrangements with local entities are a popular medium of entry by for foreign
companies. Several global brands such as Marks and Spencers, Tommy Hilfiger and Nike
have entered the market through this kind of arrangement.
The Trends In Indian Retailing
The Retail Industry in India has shown an upward trend in different formats. Retailers are
venturing into a number of formats as Indian retail transits through experimental phase. Since
most of the formats are new to the consumers, retailers have to choose models that are
customized to Indian taste and habits. A trend that has been seen in the Indian retail scenario
has been that of differentiation of product and service. However, this alone will not be
sufficient for differentiating the store. While product differentiation would play a significant
role, the gap will diminish due to ease in global sourcing for all competitors.
19
1.1.2 RETAIL FORMATS
Food and Grocery Retail Format
Food and grocery formats can be distinguished based on various parameters. These
findings are tabulated in the Table 2. As can be seen, the combinations of the seven
parameters have given rise to some generic retail formats. We can thus define a retail format
in terms of these seven parameters.
1. Categories of Merchandise
Category of merchandise refers to different types of goods held in the store. There are stores
that hold only grains and pulses, stores that hold other grocery items along with grains and
pulses and stores that hold consumer durables, clothes along with food and groceries.
2. Variety of Brands held in the store for each Type of Merchandise
Food and grocery stores can also be differentiated based on variety of brands held in the
store for each type of merchandise e.g. a Kiryana store would hold 5-6 brands of toilet
soap, however, a hypermarket would hold more than 10 brands of toilet soap.
3. Number of SKUs held in the store under each Brand
In small retail stores one may not find all SKUs under any given brand e.g. a Kiryana
store may hold only a 100 gm tube of toothpaste, however, hypermarket may hold all the
SKUs available for a particular brand of toothpaste.
4. Price of Merchandise
Retail stores can be differentiated based on price at which merchandise is sold in the store.
Thus we have stores that sell their merchandise at wholesale prices, maximum Retail
Price (MRP), discounted prices or at lowest price in the market (may be EDLP).
5. Service Offered in the Store
20
Some food and grocery stores are over-the-counter (OTC) stores. Others are self-
service stores (essentially supermarkets and hypermarkets). Some stores also offer
home-delivery service to their customers. In some cases, stores offered home delivery
when the bill value exceeds a certain amount.
6. Accessibility
Accessibility is the ease with which one can reach a particular food and grocery store. It can
be defined either in terms of distance or time required to reach a particular store. Customers
prefer to use the latter.
7. Ambience
Ambience refers to the shopping conditions that exist within a store. It is a composite
parameter composed factors like of cleanliness, lighting, walking space and arrangement
of merchandise (display).
21
Table 2: Value Proposition of Existing Food and Grocery Formats in India
Store Merchandize Number of brands
Number of SKUs
Price Service Accessibility Ambience
Kiryana Grains, Pulses, other Groceries, personal products
Medium (4-5 brands per product category)
Low MRP Home Delivery
High (Walking Distance)
Dull
Upgraded Kiryana
Grains, Pulses, other Groceries, personal products
Medium (4-5 brands per product category)
Low MRP Home Delivery+ Self Service
High (Walking Distance)
Medium
Supermarket Pulses, other Groceries, personal products , some other household items (plastics, utensils, etc)
Medium (4-5 brands per product category)
Medium Some Discount
Self Service + Home delivery based on bill amount
Medium (need to travel 10-15 mins)
Bright and Clean
Hypermarket Pulses, other Groceries, personal products, wet groceries Household appliances, clothes, Footwear etc
High (more than 6 brands per product category
High EDLP + Some Discount
Self Service + Home delivery based on bill amount
Low (need to travel more than 15 mins)
Bright and Clean
Wholesaler Grains and Pulses
Low (1-3 brands per product category)
Low Wholesale OTC – Home Delivery
Low (need to travel more than 15 mins)
Dull
22
Different Formats Existing In The Food And Grocery Sector
Kiryana Store
Kiryana store, a combination of convenience and mom-and-pop stores, is a well-located
store. Ease of shopping, personalized services, credit availability and home delivery of
ordered merchandise are the major reasons for its patronage, even when it charges average
to above average prices, and carries a less number of items. These are generally over-the-
counter (OTC) stores and have a dull atmosphere. They carry about 5000 items. They are
small stores generally less than 500 sq ft. Yet, they service almost the complete
purchase basket of customers. They are also useful for fill-in merchandise and
emergency purchases. Many customers shop at least two to three times a week at
these stores. These stores face most competition from supermarkets that have started
providing longer hours and better stocks of non-food items.
Upgraded Kiryana Stores
Some stores have upgraded themselves to offer both OTC and self-service. This is a
unique format that provides a cleaner and more hygienic environment for shopping as
compared to a small Kiryana store. The merchandise and other elements of retail mix
remain as in case of Kiryana.
Supermarkets
A conventional supermarket is a self-service food store offering groceries with limited
sales of non-food items, such as health and beauty aids and general merchandise at
discounted prices. They are larger in size and carry 9,000 to 11,000 items. They occupy
between 1000 and 4000 sq. ft space. The self-service nature allows supermarkets to cut
costs, as well as increase volume. They are chosen due to volume sales, self-service, low
prices and cleaner and brighter ambience for shopping. Supermarkets offer medium
variety of brands and SKUs. Conventional supermarkets have to deal with intense
23
competition from other types of food stores. Convenience stores offer greater customer
convenience; Hypermarkets have more product lines and greater variety, low prices, as
well as better gross margins; Wholesale dealers offer wholesale prices and have low
operating costs.
Hypermarkets
Hypermarkets are large (above 8000 sq. ft.) combination food and general merchandise
retailer. They stock a large assortment (40,000 to 60,000 items) and hence offer
more variety of merchandise, brands and SKUs. Merchandise includes groceries,
hardware, furniture, home appliances, clothes, sports equipment, and crockery.
Hypermarkets offer a clean, hygienic and bright environment for shopping. They offer
variety of promotional schemes to shoppers. Some hypermarkets are known to offer
lowest price in the market on their merchandise. This attracts consumers to such
hypermarkets. Economies of scale, efficient management of demand and supply chain
are main reasons why hypermarkets can offer lower prices in the market.
Wholesalers
Wholesalers, although not retailers in strictly sense, attract retail customers for grocery
and food items in India. They offer only one or two types of merchandise (grains and
pulses), low variety and only one or two pack sizes (in which merchandise can be
purchased). Purchase from wholesalers thus takes place in bulk. The main attraction of
the wholesaler is its low price that may be lower than prices offered by hypermarkets.
Other Existing Organized Retail Formats
Convenience store: A subdued version of a supermarket.
Merchandise: Groceries are predominantly sold.
Space occupied: Around 500 Sq. ft. to 3000 Sq. ft.
Example: stores located at the corners of the streets, Reliance Retail’s Fresh and Select.
24
Department store: A retail establishment which specializes in selling a wide range of
products without a single prominent merchandise line and is usually a part of a retail chain.
Merchandise: Apparel, household accessories, cosmetics, gifts etc.
Space occupied: Around 10000 Sq. ft. – 30000 Sq. ft.
Example: Landmark Group’s LifeStyle, Trent India Ltd.’s Westside.
Discount store: Standard merchandise sold at lower prices with lower margins and higher
volumes.
Merchandise: A variety of perishable/ non perishable goods.
Example: Viswapriya Group’s Subiksha, Piramal’s TruMart.
Specialty store: It consists of a narrow product line with deep assortment.
Merchandise: Depends on the stores
Example: Bata store deals only with footwear, RPG’s Music World, Crossword.
Figure 5
Malls: The largest form of organized retailing today. Located mainly in metro cities, in
proximity to urban outskirts.
Merchandise: They lend an ideal shopping experience with an amalgamation of product,
service and entertainment, all under a common roof.
25
Space occupied: Ranges from 60,000 sq ft to 7, 00,000 sq ft.
Example: Pantaloon Retail’s Central, Mumbai’s Orbit.
MBO’s: Multi Brand outlets, also known as Category Killers. These usually do well in busy
market places and Metros.
Merchandise: Offers several brads across a single product category
The percentage of organized retail per sector wise is very miniscule and this does not mean
that there is stagnation of growth because if we look at the Figure 5 we can clearly observe
the burgeoning pace of growth happening in all the sectors of Indian retailing. The fastest
growing formats include specialty stores, supermarkets followed by hypermarkets. The
relatively newer concept of E-tailing is also fast gaining popularity in the Indian market by
growing at a significant 9%.
PRESENT PLAYERS AND THEIR RETAIL FORMATS:
Figure 6: Formats adopted by key players
26
The above figure depicts the present scenario of the retail Industry in India i.e. the major
players present and the various retail formats that have been adopted by them. The fast
changing scenario demands the need of studying the various trends prevalent in the Indian
retail markets. These are discussed ahead.
1.1.3 RETAIL MARKET TRENDS:
New Product Categories: For a long time, the corner grocery store was the only choice
available to the consumer, especially in the urban areas. This is slowly giving way to
international formats of retailing. The traditional food and grocery segment has seen the
emergence of supermarkets/grocery chains (Food World, Nilgiris, Apna Bazaar),
convenience stores (ConveniO, HP Speedmart) and fast-food chains (McDonalds, Dominos).
However that foray has been made into the non-food segment. These include lifestyle/fashion
segments (Shoppers' Stop, Globus, LifeStyle, Westside), apparel/accessories (Pantaloon,
Levis, Reebok), books/music/gifts (Archies, MusicWorld, Crosswords, Landmark),
appliances and consumer durables (Viveks, Jainsons, Vasant & Co.), drugs and pharmacy
(Health and Glow, Apollo).
Increasing competition: Reliance is planning to launch a nationwide chain of hyper marts,
supermarkets, discount stores, department stores, convenience stores and specialty stores.
These 5,500 stores will be located in 800 cities and towns in India. Other new entrants such
as Bharti Enterprises and the AV Birla group will compete against well-established retailers,
such as Pantaloon Retail, Shoppers’ stop, Trent, Spencer’s and Lifestyle stores. Foreign
retailers are keenly evaluating the Indian market and identifying partners to forge an alliance
with in areas currently permitted by regulations.
Increase in Private Labels: Private labels have been gaining significance. More retailers are
introducing their own brands in all categories including Food & Groceries, apparel,
accessories, footwear. It is mainly growing among FMCG products in most supermarkets
with groceries accounting for 45.9%. They enhance the profitability levels of product
categories, increase retailers’ negotiation powers and create consumer loyalty. These own
27
brands also do not have to manage intermediaries since retailers maintain oversight of the
supply chain.
Shifting Toward Tier II and III cities: Indian retailers are planning to extend operations
into Tier II and Tier III cities as heightened IT off shoring activity in these locations have
increased consumers’ disposable income. The population in these cities is typically well
educated and willing to purchase goods and services. Some major retailers, like Globus,
Reliance Retail and Pantaloon, have already begun building a retail presence in Tier III cities
before many retailers have finalized their Tier II retail operations.
Venturing into Agri-Business: India’s most prestigious business houses and global retailers
are planning to enter retail agri-business. Market entrants plan to invest in the entire value
chain, moving goods “from the farm to the fridge at home.” Viewed as India’s next “Sunrise
Sector,” retailers are employing contract farming as a means of boosting their ventures.
Contract farming enables farmers to access land, manpower and farming skill without having
to purchase land. Of the total Cultivable land of 400 million acres in India, contract farming
represents 7 million acres thus indicating a tremendous opportunity. For pure corporate
contracts between farmers and companies, only 2,00,000 acres are used.
Experimenting with formats: Selecting the right retail format is essential in modern
retailing. The difference between urban and rural customers is one of the reasons why
multiple formats are required in India. Local conditions and insights into buying-behavior
shape the format choice. No single format will be suitable for an all India strategy and
selecting the relevant format is the key success factor.
28
1.1.4 POTENTIAL ROADBLOCKS TO THE RETAIL GROWTH STORY
Despite the spectacular growth projections, one must not remain oblivious to the potential
roadblocks that may hamper the growth of the organized retailing in the country. Some of
these are shown and described below.
Figure 7
Real estate costs: Most retailers interviewed expressed concerns about the high cost of real
estate today. On the other hand, the average purchase ticket size in India is still low. This
could lead to a situation of high fixed cost, with low contribution per sale for retailers. High
footfalls would be a necessary condition for success. Unless real estate costs become
conducive to retail growth, most retail business will take a longer time for break-even.
Distribution costs: A key bottleneck mentioned by respondents is the absence of distribution
networks connecting Tier-II towns with regional logistics hubs. There is scope for organized
logistics players like regional transport companies/ third party logistics (3PL) players to
develop these distribution networks including warehouses, cold chains and truck/ multi-
29
modal services connecting these locations. Investments are being made in warehouses and
hubs by Indian corporate. Outsourced logistics service providers are also emerging.
Regulatory aspects: A point that kept emerging in various discussions with the retailers was
the dated regulations in the country. For example Weights and Measures Act expects all
goods to be available in the factory packed form in the stores. Similarly Agricultural Produce
Marketing Committee (APMC) Acts consider even small volume purchases to qualify as
wholesale deals. There are also variations among states with respect to aspects like store
timings. All these are hindrances that can restrict rapid growth of retailing in India.
Skilled retail personnel: A key concern raised by most respondents has been the expected
shortfall of trained manpower to meet expansion plans. With increasing competition from the
ITeS industry, retail manpower shortage could become a critical bottleneck that limits
player's expansion plans. Individual players are taking proactive measures like providing on-
the-job training, setting up retail academies etc to ensure availability of people with the right
skill sets. However, the industry as a whole would need to step forward and put in place
measures to deal with the critical gap.
1.1.5 URBAN VS RURAL RETAIL TRENDS:
Urban Trends
The urban retailing has been experimenting with many formats like the supermarkets,
hypermarkets, specialty stores, multi branded outlets etc. and of latest it seems to be
embracing the trend of mall culture. It is a rich man's world too, with multi-screen cinemas,
restaurants, games and branded shops - well out of the reach of many of the country's one
billion people. But India's middle-classes, widely travelled and with deep pockets, are
flocking to malls.
India's organized retail industry accounts for just 3% of the country's total retail sales, though
it is poised to grow by 97% per year in the next five years to a staggering $24bn. Fuelling
this growth are India's sprawling shopping malls, which are increasingly challenging High
30
Street stores, corner shops and village markets alike. Just five years ago, there were shopping
arcades but no malls. Today there are nearly 100 big shopping malls in the country, more
than half of them in Delhi and Mumbai alone. And in two years there will be 360 malls
across the country. More than 20 are in various stages of development in Delhi and Mumbai.
Among them is India's biggest shopping mall, Ambi, which is being built in Gurgaon, near
Delhi. Spread over 3.2 million square feet, it is set to become a virtual town, where multi-
screen cinemas, recreational facilities for adults and children, food courts and branded outlets
will fill the space. It will have exclusive showrooms of international brands, where,
according to the developers, customers will have to shop by prior appointment. Analysts
comment that this is just the beginning and this is going to experience a ‘sea change’ once
the platform is opened up for the FDI
Figure 8
Rural Trends
Wal-mart, the world's largest corporation, also had its roots in rural America. Unlike many
other retailers who started from urban centers and then trickled down to rural areas, Wal-mart
had started from rural areas and then came closer to cities over a period of time. Many more
such concepts are likely to be tested in the future as marketers and retailers begin to
31
acknowledge that the rural consumer is more than a ‘poor cousin' of the urban counterpart.
The IMAGES KSA Report avers that these concepts are likely to go a long way in bringing a
huge untapped population within the purview of organized retailing, thereby, increasing the
size of the total market.
India's largely rural population has also caught the eye of retailers looking for new areas of
growth. ITC launched the country's first rural mall ‘ Chaupal Sagar' , offering a diverse
product range from FMCG to electronics appliance to automobiles, attempting to provide
farmers a one-stop destination for all of their needs. There has been yet another initiative by
the DCM Sriram Group called the ‘ Hariyali Bazaar' , that has initially started off by
providing farm related inputs and services but plans to introduce the complete shopping
basket in due course. Other corporate bodies include Escorts, and Tata Chemicals (with Tata
Kisan Sansar) setting up agri-stores to provide products/services targeted at the farmer in
order to tap the vast rural market.
In INDIA RETAIL REPORT 2005, Mr. Adi B. Godrej, Chairman, The Godrej Group said
that his group had also launched the concept of agri-stores named 'Adhaar', which served as
one-stop shops for farmers selling agricultural products such as fertilizers & animal feed
and also providing farmers knowledge on how to effectively utilize these products. "There
are 8 stores already operating in Maharashtra and Gujarat and further expansion is very much
on the cards. FDI could indeed do a lot in this sector as entry of international retailers would
bring in the required expertise to set the supply chain in place which would result in
elimination of wastage, better prices and quality for consumers and higher income for
farmers besides of course farm produce retailing getting a facelift”.
Godrej Group's Agro and Food division, Godrej Agrovet Ltd. (GAVL) operates the format,
selling a variety of vegetables, fruits and herbs - both local and exotic thereby introducing the
concept of 'farm-to-plate' to urbanites. Tapping the fresh farm produce sector, the group plans
to take its recently launched retail concept – Nature's Basket - to newer cities steadily. Godrej
plans to open four more Nature's Basket stores in Mumbai before taking them national.
32
1.1.6 SWOT ANALYSIS:
A SWOT analysis of the Indian organized retail industry is presented below:
Strength:
1. Technology-intensive: Retailing is technology driven which helps the organized retailers
to score over the unorganized retailers. Successful organized retailers today work closely
with their vendors to predict consumer demand, shorten lead times, reduce inventory holding
and ultimately save cost. Example: Wal-Mart pioneered the concept of building competitive
advantage through distribution & information systems in the retailing industry. They
introduced two innovative logistics techniques – cross-docking and EDI (electronic data
interchange)
2. On an average a super market stocks up to 5000 SKU's against a few hundreds stocked
with an average unorganized retailer. This will provide variety in products (required breadth
& depth for consumers)
3. As a consequence of high volumes, procurement will be direct from the Manufacturer.
Hence, merchandise can be offered at lower costs.
Weakness:
1. Less Conversion level : Despite high footfalls, the conversion ratio has been very low in
the retail outlets in a mall as compared to the standalone counter parts. It is seen that actual
conversions of footfall into sales for a mall outlet is approximately 20-25%. On the other
hand, a high street store of retail chain has an average conversion of about 50-60%. As a
result, a stand-alone store has a ROI (return on investment) of 25-30%; in contrast the retail
majors are experiencing a ROI of 8-10%
2. Customer Loyalty: Retail chains are yet to settle down with the proper merchandise mix
for the mall outlets. Since the stand-alone outlets were established long time back, so they
have stabilized in terms of footfalls & merchandise mix and thus have a higher customer
loyalty base.
33
Opportunity:
1. The Indian middle class is already 30 Crores & is projected to grow to over 60 Crores by
2010 making India one of the largest consumer markets of the world. The IMAGES-KSA
projections indicate that by 2015, India will have over 55 Crores people under the age of 20 -
reflecting the enormous opportunities possible in the kids and teens retailing segment.
2. Organized retail is only 3% of the total retailing market in India. It is estimated to grow at
the rate of 25-30% p.a. and reach INR 1,00,000 Crores by 2010.
3. Percolating down : In India it has been found out that the top 6 cities contribute for 66%
of total organized retailing. While the metros have already been exploited, the focus has now
been shifted towards the tier-II cities. The 'retail boom', 85% of which has so far been
concentrated in the metros is beginning to percolate down to these smaller cities and towns.
The contribution of these tier-II cities to total organized retailing sales is expected to grow to
20-25%.
4. Rural Retailing: India's huge rural population has caught the eye of the retailers looking
for new areas of growth. ITC launched India's first rural mall "Chaupal Saga" offering a
diverse range of products from FMCG to electronic goods to automobiles, attempting to
provide farmers a one-stop destination for all their needs." Hariyali Bazar" is started by DCM
Sriram group which provides farm related inputs & services. The Godrej group has launched
the concept of 'agri-stores' named "Adhaar" which offers agricultural products such as
fertilizers & animal feed along with the required knowledge for effective use of the same to
the farmers.
Threat:
1. If the unorganized retailers are put together, they are parallel to a large supermarket with
no or little overheads, high degree of flexibility in merchandise, display, prices and
turnover.
2. Shopping Culture: Shopping culture has not developed in India as yet. Even now malls
are just a place to hang around with family and friends and largely confined to window-
shopping.
34
3. Cultural Variation leads to variation in merchandise in India at different geographical
locations.
1.1.7 CONCLUSION:
Organized retailing in India has been maturing by passing through many trends with the entry
of many big players trying to build and strengthen their retail muscle by pumping in a lot of
money in the retail space. And in the light of this situation some feel that the conventional
stores may loose out their existence. Once the FDI is allowed into the Indian retail market
there may be drastic changes in the Indian retailing and its focus may also shift to the vast
untapped rural market which needs huge investments to build the infrastructure. All these
changes in the Indian retail market are finally going to end up by benefiting the Indian
consumer.
35
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
36
2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW
In India and rest of Asia organized retail is expected to grow rapidly in future. One
factor in favor of this growth is the increased consumer valuation of time
(Messinger and Narsimhan, 1997). As shoppers face more and more paucity of time,
their preferences would shift towards one-stop shopping experiences. This supports the
popular belief that hypermarkets would flourish in future. In a study of store choice
behavior amongst audio equipment shoppers, Dash et al (1976) suggested that specialty
store shoppers were more certain than the department store shoppers about their
product choice being satisfactory. A housewife purchases fruits and vegetables from a
roadside vendor, whom she has been patronizing since long, rather than from a
supermarket. Taking a cue from this, it could be assumed that the perceived risk of
purchase going wrong is less at the vegetable vendor as compared to a supermarket,
where there is no guarantee of the fruits and vegetables being fresh. Here a store is
being chosen based on self- confidence that the customer has regarding the store.
Sharma and Krishnan (2002) have highlighted another important aspect with regard to
format choice by shoppers. The study found that sales people do not seem to enhance
preference for stores. Thus a simple not so literate grocer at a Kiryana store might prove
to be more effective than qualified and well trained salespeople at big hypermarkets.
This is one of the reasons why Kiryana stores are still so popular in India. Small stores seem
to be able to create a special relationship between the salespeople and their customers.
Zeithaml (1988) found that consumers consider both monetary and non-monetary costs-
such as time and effort, to evaluate value of shopping at a particular store. Hence
anything that can be built to reduce time, effort and search costs can increase
37
perceptions of value. Search costs for a shopper can be reduced by properly laying out and
displaying the merchandise. Use of appropriate signage can also reduce search effort. This
is where store ambience plays an important role. The shopping experience as created by
a clean, hygienic, well lit and neatly laid out store has been found to increase store
patronage.
Amongst parameters that define a store format Engel, Blackwell and Miniard (2001)
observed that price level, assortment and location of store appear as important drivers
for consumer‘s choice between store formats. Quality and service on the other hand
did not differentiate between formats in their study.
A different approach of assessing shoppers‘format choice decision process is based on
utility that shoppers derive from shopping at a particular store. Consumer‘s choice of
preferred store format is based on the perceived utility that s/he derives from the store
format (Solgaard and Hansen, 2003). In principle utility emerges based partly on what
the consumers perceive they receive and partly on what consumers perceive they give. To
receive the store service the consumer will incur some costs, i.e., spend a certain amount
of resources , time, effort and money. Since these resources are scarce, the consumers
would try to direct their resources towards the stores that will maximize their utility.
This theory was developed based on the Prospect Theory as explained by Khanmen
and Tversky (1979). Later the concept of Transaction Utility was modeled depending
on the difference between the selling price and reference price. To explain this
reference price was postulated and describes as the amount of money that a customer
expects to pay for a good or service. It is suggested that any purchase occasion is
associated with two utilities: acquisition utility and transaction utility. Acquisition utility
represents the economic gain or loss from the transaction. Where as transaction utility is
associated with purchase or (sale) and represents the pleasure (or displeasure) of the
financial deal per se and is function of the difference between the selling price (p) and
the reference price (q). The situation where p > q, the transaction utility is negative (rip-off
situation); conversely when p < q, the transaction utility is positive (bargain situation).
38
The total utility of a purchase is a sum of acquisition utility and transaction utility
(Thaler, 1983). The implication is that an individual may not buy a product if acquisition
utility is offset by loss in transaction utility when the price is sufficiently larger than
reference price.
However, even though this theory exemplifies a purchase situation, it has not been
applied in a retailing perspective. Given the basic tenet, it is felt that acquisition utility
and transaction utility can be used to explain the shoppers‘ choice of a format. The
theory may require modifications. Acquisition utility can be extended to include not only
the price of the merchandise but also other costs associated with shopping such as, cost
of product search, cost of information, size of purchase, and cost of access to the
store. Shopping, being essentially a process that occurs in a context of a store may have
a close association with the transaction utility. The perceived value delivered through
the transaction could include all non-monetary aspects of the 'deal' that may include
ambience and service at the retail point for explaining the transactional utility of the
format.
Shugar (1984) presents a theoretically logical development of factors influencing price
quality relationships. It suggests that customers compare the quality they experience with a
norm or standard, such as pre-purchase expectations about a particular product or service.
Any perceived discrepancy between the two leads to increased or decreased satisfaction
(Oliver, 1980).
Kenhove et al. (1999) found that store choice is differentiated by the nature of the task. They
studied the store choice decision across various tasks as described by the respondents, such
as urgent purchase, large quantities, difficult job, regular purchase and get ideas.
Store choice has also been found dependent on socio-economic background of consumers,
their personality and past purchase experience (Dodge and Summer, 1969). Lumpkin et al.
(1985) found that as compared to young shoppers, elderly shoppers were less price-conscious
and proximity of residence to store was not an important factor for them. They considered
39
shopping as recreational activity and thus chose a store that is perceived to be high on
“entertainment” value.
Hutcheson and Mutinho (1998) found that shoppers used a combination of the quality of
staff and “the occurrence of low prices and the frequency of promotions” in choosing a store.
The role of ambience in store choice has also been found significant. Kotler (1973) has
proposed atmospherics as an important part of retail marketing strategy.
In recent times, Leszczyc and Sinha (2000) indicated that store choice was a dynamic
decision and could be conceptualized as a problem of deciding when and where to shop. The
first decision regarding choice of the traditional store location and the second regarding the
timing of the shopping trip incidence.
Another study showed that shoppers demanded good service as well as quality merchandise
from the retailers (Business Today, 1999). Evidence for the effect of dissatisfaction can be
shown in the tendency for people to discuss their negative experiences more than the positive
ones, an effect widely known to bias surveys (deVaus, 1996).
Baker, Grewal and Parasuraman (1994) posited that consumers make inferences about
merchandise and service quality based on store environment factors and that these inferences,
in turn, influence store image. Merchandise quality, styling, price, assortment, location
convenience, staff service, general service, store environment and pleasantness of shopping
have been identified as components of store image (e.g., Lindquist 1974; Mazursky and
Jacoby 1986; Zimmer and Golden 1988).
2.2 PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
In recent years many Indian business houses and global retailers such as Vishal Mega mart,
Reliance, Tata, Aditya Birla Group, Trent, Giant, Big Bazaar, IKEA and Amway entered
Indian retail market. Competing with local outlets, they experienced lower than average
performance in certain cities. This provided me with the idea to start this research. I started
40
by trying to generate the list of factors that determine consumers’ shopping behavior in
retailing. In order to influence the choice of the consumers towards a particular store, it is
expected to obtain such benefits as frequent purchase, big amount of purchase, cost
reduction, and favorable word of mouth (Zeithaml and Bitner 1996).
This study was aimed at identifying the differences that exists in the consumer perception
regarding a Kiryana store and a Retail store. The difference was studied amongst a list of
factors inclusive of the store attributes, salesperson dimension, physical aspects, store policy,
etc.
Also the study was aimed at studying the various In-Store influences that affect the
repurchase behavior of the consumers visiting the store. This includes the physical evidence
that the store provides to the customers including the layout, store size, ease of searching for
the goods, contact personnel etc.
The study also aims at studying how the recommendation as well as repurchase behavior of
the customers varies as a function of the demographics i.e. the age, monthly income, gender
and occupation.
41
CHAPTER 3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
42
Marketing Research is a systematic and objective process of identifying and formulating the
marketing problems, setting research objectives and methods for collecting editing, coding,
tabulating, evaluating, analysis, interpreting and presenting data in order to find justified
solutions to these problems. Planning provides a framework within which the goals of
research are to be achieved. It facilitates the smooth sailing of the various research
operations, thereby, making research as efficient as possible the plan and procedure of any
research study is bound up with its purpose. The purpose of the present study was to study
the determinants of store loyalty.
The research methodology adopted for the study is described below:
3.1 PROBLEM DEFINITION
With the increasing number of retail stores, the survival of the shop around the corner
becomes an issue of concern. The study is aimed at understanding the perception of the
customers towards both the type of stores, their approach towards the various store attributes,
the marketing mix adopted by the stores etc so as to analyze if there is a shift in the store
preference by the customers.
3.2 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the study are:
Primary Objectives:
To study the difference in consumer perception in a retail outlet vis-à-vis a kiryana store in
regard to the following parameters:
1. Analyse the type of store preferred- retail or kiryana
2. To study factors influencing choice of store
43
3. To analyse effect of 4Ps of Marketing (product, price, promotion, place)
4. To study purchase behavior
5. To study in store influences
6. To study satisfaction level
7. To study post purchase behavior.
Secondary Objectives
1. To study the factors influencing store choice among the current consumers
2. To study the affect of the In-Store influences on repurchase behavior.
3. To study the recommending behavior and switching behavior across demographic
variables
3.3 RESEARCH DESIGN
Type of the study
The study was both an exploratory and descriptive in nature. Firstly, exploratory study was
conducted to find out basic information regarding store attributes. The exploratory study was
helpful in formulating hypothesis & also in assessing how consumers make decision about
the specific retail type for buying goods. After carrying out the exploratory research,
descriptive study was carried out to identify the factors or variables so to understand the
determinants of store loyalty.
Hypothesis
H01: There is no significant difference between the consumer perception regarding a kiryana
store and a retail store.
H02: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase
behavior and the Age of the customer.H02a: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the Age of the kiryana store customer.
H02b: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the Age of the retail store customer.
44
H3: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase
behavior and the gender of the customer.H03a: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the gender of the kiryana store customer.
H03b: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the gender of the retail store customer.
H4: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase
behavior and the occupation of the customer.H04a: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the occupation of the kiryana store customer.
H04b: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the occupation of the retail store customer.
H5: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase
behavior and the monthly income of the customer. H05a: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the monthly income of the kiryana store customer.
H05b: There is no significant positive relation between recommendation and repurchase behavior and
the monthly income of the retail store customer.
Scope of the study
The study will be conducted in Mohali. A few selected organized and un-organized stores
will be visited at different locations in the Mohali. The study however shall not be restricted
to only the large and popular stores but will be done in stores at different locations so as to
avoid data from similar consumer profiles
Need of study
Identification of customers and their buying behavior patterns have been the focus of a
number of retail store studies. The results of these studies have been useful to the marketing
managers in providing solutions to various marketing problems.
45
The aim of this study is to ascertain whether the consumer preference is actually shifting
from the shop around the corner to the retail biggie. This will help to judge whether the retail
format poses as a threat to the existence of the kiryana stores in mohali
3.4 METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION
Secondary Data:
The secondary data was referred to gain an insight into the work that has already been done
in the context of the retailing scenario in India. Previous researches, articles published
regarding the comparative studies, text on consumer behavior were studied. The sources were
management journals (Journal of Retailing, Journal of Marketing Research),Books,
Marketing Research Websites, Research papers, Print Articles etc.
Primary Data:
Primary data was collected through the structured questionnaires by survey method. The
questionnaires were personally dispersed to the respondents to using convenience sampling
to collect the relevant information after the secondary study had identified and refined
measurement items used for the study. Respondents were asked to assess their perception of
various items, including factors viewed as antecedents of quality and satisfaction.
Assessment was based on a five point likert scale which was included in self administered
structured questionnaires.
Items and Scale
The questionnaire included store image and store loyalty items in Likert 5 point scale and
other demographic items such as occupation and income. It was used for both types of stores.
It included items that are related to characteristics of store attributes and store choice in
Likert scale and demographic characteristics in nominal, ratio, and ordinal scale
46
3.5 SAMPLING
Sampling Unit
People who buy from grocery stores including modern retail format
Age group: above 20 yrs
City: Mohali
Time period: 2-3 weeks
Sampling Technique: Convenience Sampling
More emphasis on family member making the purchase decisions (Random size=150)Type of Store Retail Store Kiryana Store
Sample Size 74 76
3.6 STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES USED
For the analysis of the results of the study, various statistical tools were used using the aid of
MS EXCEL, SPSS
These statistical techniques used were:
1) Descriptive Statistics: Measures of central tendency such as mean, median, standard
deviation etc were worked out to study the nature and distribution of scores on
various variables. The means were calculated for the each of the thirty six attributes
including demographics before the t-test, correlation, chi-square could be applied.
2) Z- test: - test was used to assess whether the means of two groups (Retail store &
Kiryana store) are statistically different from each other or not. Z-test would help to
prove the hypothesis of the existence of factors that govern the customer’s choice of
the store.
3.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
47
All research studies have their limitations and this study is no exception. In designing the
study the researcher attempted to be as scientific as possible, the present study nevertheless
has the following limitations.
1) The limitation concerns the nature of the measures used. The measures included in
this research were all based on the perceptions of the participating customers.
Therefore, the potential for data inaccuracies due to item misrepresentation or
predisposition to certain responses on the part of participant does exist.
2) Responses (with respect to store type preference and store attributes) have been
solicited from the customers in Mohali The perception of people in this area may
vary from those of the rest of India.
3) Some customers (of both retail and kiryana store) did not participate in this study.
As a result, the generalization of the findings of this research should be considered
carefully.
4) This study attempted to explore extensively underlying key attributes of store.
However, there may still be a possibility of missing key dimensions.
48
CHAPTER 4
DATA INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS
49
Q1. GENDER: Graph 4.1: Gender
Interpretation:
Out of the total respondents surveyed for the research 60% were females and 40% were
males. The data was collected through convenience sampling.
2. AGE: Graph 4.2: Age
The above chart shows that the maximum percentage of people i.e. 51.3%, visiting the store,
belong to the age group of 25 to 34 hence the survey largely included the young earning
individuals
50
3. OCCUPATION: Graph 4.3: Occupation
Interpretation:
Maximum respondents targeted were the housewives, followed by the working men/women.
A small percentage of the sample was students basically the residents of hostels/Paying
Guests.
4. INCOME: Graph 4.4: Income
Maximum number of people visiting the store is belonging to the income group 20001 to
30000 followed by varied percentages of other groups.
51
Comparison Of The Store Type Visited On The Basis Of Demographics
5. AGE AND STORE TYPE:
Graph 4.5
Across all age groups, higher number of respondents still visits the kiryana store.
6. GENDER AND TYPE OF STORE:
Graph 4.6
52
Approximately same number of men and women visit each type of store.
7. OCCUPATION AND TYPE OF STORE
Graph 4.7
Across all occupations, nearly equal preference is given to both the stores, however, larger
number of students prefer the modern retail stores for their purchases.
8. INCOME AND STORE TYPE:
Graph 4.8
53
There isn’t a significant difference observed between the store types visited on the basis of
the income pattern of the sample.
10. VISITED ONCE IN DIFFERENT STORES
Stores visited once
1.Big bazaar 98
2.6-ten 120
3.Vishal Mega Mart 23
4.Easy Day 1
5.More 14
6.Reliance 87
7.others 64
Graph 4.10
Interpretation:
Visited Once
98
120
23
114
87
64
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
visited once
1bigbazar 2.6-ten3.Vishal Mega Mart 4.Easy Day5.More6.Reliance7.others
54
6-Ten is mostly visited followed by big bazar,Reliance fresh and then unorganized stores
11. HOW MANY TIMES VISIT IN RETAIL STORES IN LAST TWO MONTHS?
Stores once 2 times 3 timesmore than
>3 times
1.Big bazaar 31 14 5 3
2.6-ten 21 18 36 45
3.Vishal Mega Mart 18 3 1 1
4.Easy Day 1 0 0 0
5.More 2 3 4 5
6.Reliance 21 13 17 36
7.others 12 15 28 9
Graph 4.11
55
12. T- TEST
T- test was calculated to compare the means of all the variables i.e. price, advertisement,
assortment, brand, store atmosphere, facilities, credit service, convenience of shopping,
location, promotion, sales personnel service, and product quality etc across the two store
types. We are primarily concerned with whether p (significance) is greater than or less than
0.05. The t value gives the estimated number of standard errors between the two means. So
as a rule of thumb, I report one digit behind the decimal for a t-value, and report two digits
behind the decimal for a p-value. T- test was used to assess whether the means of perceptions
regarding the two groups (Retail store & Kiryana store) are statistically different from each
other or not..
Visit inLast Two Months
31 21 181 2
21 12
1418
3
0 3
1315
536
1
0 4
17 283
45
1
05
369
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Big ba
zari
2.6-te
n
3.Vish
al Meg
a Mart
4.Eas
y Day
5.More
6.Reli
ance
7.othe
rs
more than >3 times3 times2 timesonce
56
Group 1 was chosen as Kiryana Store
Group 2 was chosen as Retail Store.
The group statistics table provides the means, the standard deviation and the standard error
mean of the various variables considered.
The independent samples test provides information about the variables across which the
consumers perception differs as far as the retail store and the kiryana stores are concerned.
This helps to infer whether there actually exists a difference in the perception or not.
This independent t-test will hence help to test the hypothesis H0 i.e. there exists a difference
in the consumer perception across a retail store and a kiryana store.
Group Statistics
Str_type N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Merch_good 1 76 3.49 .872 .100
2 74 3.70 .887 .103
Prd_qual 1 76 3.01 .721 .083
2 74 3.50 .969 .113
Qual_price 1 76 3.20 .817 .094
2 74 3.32 .796 .092
LowPrice 1 76 3.33 .999 .115
2 74 3.20 .921 .107
Prd_Avail 1 76 2.88 1.188 .136
2 74 3.64 .973 .113
Variety 1 76 2.86 1.016 .117
57
2 74 3.50 1.076 .125
Att_schemes 1 76 2.57 1.147 .132
2 74 3.41 .964 .112
Product 1 76 3.21 .957 .110
2 74 3.68 .967 .112
Groc_greengroc 1 76 2.80 1.255 .144
2 74 3.47 .910 .106
Layout 1 76 2.66 .974 .112
2 74 3.88 .810 .094
Spacious 1 76 2.46 1.125 .129
2 74 3.85 1.002 .117
Easy_search 1 76 2.95 1.188 .136
2 74 3.57 .966 .112
Adv_POP 1 76 2.55 1.063 .122
2 74 3.30 .932 .108
Distance 1 76 3.91 1.133 .130
2 74 3.19 1.143 .133
Parking 1 76 3.24 1.165 .134
2 74 3.39 .841 .098
Phy_cond 1 76 3.11 1.066 .122
2 74 3.82 .765 .089
Phys_facilty 1 76 2.51 1.113 .128
2 74 3.65 .883 .103
Home_del 1 76 3.67 1.112 .128
2 74 3.28 1.117 .130
St_atmp 1 76 2.38 1.107 .127
2 74 3.41 .875 .102
Exch_ret 1 76 3.43 .971 .111
2 74 2.86 .911 .106
Queues 1 76 2.76 1.005 .115
2 74 3.05 1.226 .143
St_image 1 76 2.42 .942 .108
58
2 74 3.32 .796 .092
St_brand 1 76 2.36 .962 .110
2 74 3.51 .798 .093
Happiness 1 76 2.93 1.050 .120
2 74 3.50 .969 .113
Credit 1 76 3.39 1.223 .140
2 74 2.92 1.191 .138
Sman_kind 1 76 3.63 .892 .102
2 74 3.39 .904 .105
Sman_assist 1 76 3.36 .934 .107
2 74 3.32 .967 .112
St_promise 1 76 3.29 .877 .101
2 74 3.20 .776 .090
St_action 1 76 3.20 .924 .106
2 74 3.30 1.017 .118
Repurchase 1 76 3.47 1.013 .116
2 74 3.31 .875 .102
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for
Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2-
tailed)
Mean
Difference
Std. Error
Difference
95% Confidence Interval of
the Difference
Lower Upper
Merch_good Equal variances assumed .362 .548 -1.503 148 .135 -.216 .144 -.500 .068
Equal variances not
assumed-1.503 147.708 .135 -.216 .144 -.500 .068
Prd_qual EVA 12.217 .001 -3.498 148 .001 -.487 .139 -.762 -.212
EVNA -3.485 134.813 .001 -.487 .140 -.763 -.211
59
Qual_price EVA .001 .970 -.964 148 .337 -.127 .132 -.387 .133
EVNA -.964 148.000 .336 -.127 .132 -.387 .133
LowPrice EVA .625 .430 .804 148 .423 .126 .157 -.184 .436
EVNA .805 147.577 .422 .126 .157 -.184 .436
Prd_Avail EVA 6.001 .015 -4.242 148 .000 -.754 .178 -1.105 -.403
EVNA -4.254 143.805 .000 -.754 .177 -1.104 -.403
Variety EVA .077 .782 -3.774 148 .000 -.645 .171 -.982 -.307
EVNA -3.772 146.961 .000 -.645 .171 -.983 -.307
Att_schemes EVA 3.309 .071 -4.847 148 .000 -.840 .173 -1.182 -.497
EVNA -4.858 144.927 .000 -.840 .173 -1.181 -.498
Product EVA .405 .526 -2.962 148 .004 -.465 .157 -.775 -.155
EVNA -2.962 147.794 .004 -.465 .157 -.776 -.155
Groc_greengro
c
EVA 16.512 .000 -3.738 148 .000 -.670 .179 -1.025 -.316
EVNA -3.753 136.887 .000 -.670 .179 -1.024 -.317
Layout EVA 8.188 .005 -8.334 148 .000 -1.220 .146 -1.510 -.931
EVNA -8.354 144.507 .000 -1.220 .146 -1.509 -.932
Spacious EVA 3.106 .080 -7.987 148 .000 -1.391 .174 -1.735 -1.047
EVNA-8.000 146.866 .000 -1.391 .174 -1.734 -1.047
Easy_search EVA 3.954 .049 -3.503 148 .001 -.620 .177 -.970 -.270
EVNA -3.512 143.500 .001 -.620 .177 -.969 -.271
Adv_POP EVA 2.285 .133 -4.556 148 .000 -.745 .163 -1.068 -.422
EVNA -4.564 146.417 .000 -.745 .163 -1.067 -.422
Distance EVA 1.106 .295 3.867 148 .000 .719 .186 .351 1.086
EVNA 3.866 147.818 .000 .719 .186 .351 1.086
Parking EVA 11.662 .001 -.933 148 .353 -.155 .166 -.484 .173
EVNA -.937 136.592 .351 -.155 .166 -.482 .172
Phy_cond EVA 13.739 .000 -4.737 148 .000 -.719 .152 -1.019 -.419
EVNA -4.757 136.202 .000 -.719 .151 -1.018 -.420
Phys_facilty EVA 8.021 .005 -6.910 148 .000 -1.135 .164 -1.460 -.811
EVNA -6.931 142.192 .000 -1.135 .164 -1.459 -.812
Home_del EVA .745 .389 2.128 148 .035 .387 .182 .028 .747
60
EVNA 2.128 147.859 .035 .387 .182 .028 .747
St_atmp EVA 4.958 .027 -6.274 148 .000 -1.024 .163 -1.346 -.701
EVNA -6.293 142.011 .000 -1.024 .163 -1.345 -.702
Exch_ret EVA 1.011 .316 3.701 148 .000 .569 .154 .265 .873
EVNA 3.704 147.808 .000 .569 .154 .266 .873
Queues EVA 5.700 .018 -1.591 148 .114 -.291 .183 -.652 .070
EVNA -1.587 140.997 .115 -.291 .183 -.653 .072
St_image EVA 1.846 .176 -6.337 148 .000 -.903 .143 -1.185 -.622
EVNA -6.351 145.133 .000 -.903 .142 -1.184 -.622
St_brand EVA 1.497 .223 -8.015 148 .000 -1.158 .145 -1.444 -.873
EVNA -8.034 144.380 .000 -1.158 .144 -1.443 -.873
Happiness EVA .146 .702 -3.428 148 .001 -.566 .165 -.892 -.240
EVNA -3.432 147.577 .001 -.566 .165 -.892 -.240
Credit EVA .811 .369 2.414 148 .017 .476 .197 .086 .865
EVNA 2.414 148.000 .017 .476 .197 .086 .865
Sman_kind EVA .097 .756 1.635 148 .104 .240 .147 -.050 .529
EVNA 1.634 147.764 .104 .240 .147 -.050 .530
Sman_assist EVA .105 .747 .199 148 .842 .031 .155 -.276 .338
EVNA .199 147.445 .842 .031 .155 -.276 .338
St_promise EVA 1.574 .212 .641 148 .522 .087 .135 -.181 .354
EVNA .642 146.687 .522 .087 .135 -.180 .354
St_action EVA .887 .348 -.630 148 .530 -.100 .159 -.413 .213
EVNA -.629 145.830 .530 -.100 .159 -.414 .214
Repurchase EVA 3.435 .066 1.053 148 .294 .163 .155 -.143 .469
EVNA 1.055 145.931 .293 .163 .154 -.142 .468
For significance values >0.05, we consider the row of Equal Variance Assumed (EVA). If
the value of EVA <0.05, the variable is included amongst the factors where the costumer
believes that the two store types differ.
61
For significance values <0.05, we consider the row of Equal Variance Not Assumed
(EVNA). If the value of EVNA <0.05, the variable is included amongst the factors where the
costumer believes that the two store types differ.
As can be seen from the table above, specifically from the values in bold, it is observed that
the consumer perception about both types of the stores varies across a number of variables.
These include
Store has a good selection of merchandize
Availability of new fashionable products greater variety of brands of products available Store provides attractive schemes to make experience better Possibility of finding all products to be purchased Availability of grocery and green grocery under one roof Store layout is good Store is spacious and allows easy movement Easy to search for the product desired Advertisement/signage is attractive Store is located nearby Store is in good physical condition Physical facilities in store are better Store offer home delivery facility Luxurious atmosphere of the store attracts Easy exchange and return
Store has high class image Store has high brand name Greater happiness of shopping atmosphere Availability of credit facility
Hence, our initial hypothesis H0, pertaining to the primary objective of the study stands
proven i.e. there is a difference in the consumer perception regarding a retail store vis-à-vis a
kiryana store.
62
13. Reasons to buy food and grocery from retail store
1.Range of Product Available
2.Cleaniness and freshness of products
3.Behaviour of shop assistants
4.Discount and promotinal offers
5.Ease of locating products in the stores
6.proximity of the store from your home
7.cleaniness and ambiance of the store
8.Accuracy and speed of billing
9.Home delivery facility
10.Account facility with shop and making monthly payment
Total= 291 272 361 323 312 381 339 404 464 527
Avg= 1.94 1.81 2.4 2.15 2.08 2.54 2.26 2.69 3.09 3.51
Rank= 2 1 6 4 3 7 5 8 9 10
Interpretation:
The most important factor for buying food and grocery from retail store are
cleanliness of product followed by range of product ,ease of locating the product and least
important factor are home delivery, account facility with shop and making monthly payment
14. Reason to visit kiryana store?
1.Range of Product Available
2.Cleaniness and freshness of products
3.Behaviour of shop assistants
4.Discount and promotinal offers
5.Ease of locating products in the stores
6.proximity of the store from your home
7.cleaniness and ambiance of the store
8.Accuracy and speed of billing
9.Home delivery facility
10.Account facility with shop and making monthly payment
Total= 51 70 84 101 218 228 115 88 60 275
63
Avg= 1.59 2.18 2.62 3.15 6.81 7.12 3.59 2.75 2 8.59
Rank=1 3 4 5 8 9 7 5 2 10
Interpretation:
The most important factor for buying food and grocery from
kiryana store are range of product followed by home delivery facility, cleanliness, behavior
of employee and least important are proximity, account facility with shop and making
monthly payment
64
CHAPTER 5
FINDINGS AND SUGGESTIONS
65
5.1 MAJOR FINDINGS1) Across all age groups, higher number of respondents still visits the kiryana store. The
respondents of age group 25-34 years (51.33% of the total respondents) still prefer the
kiryana store. Whereas the relatively younger age group i.e. 15-24 years comprising
26.67% of the total respondents, has a higher preference for the retail store.
2) The findings of the study show that equal number of respondents, from the 50.7% of
the respondents whose monthly income lies between Rs 20,000 to Rs 30,000,visit the
kiryana as well as the retail store. While more number of people in the higher income
group i.e. >Rs 30,000, which constitute 15.3% of the total respondents shop at the
kiryana store.
3) According to the survey, larger number of housewives (48% of total sample) still
prefer kiryana store whereas the students (3.7% of the total sample) like visiting the
retail stores. Amongst the working respondents (43.3% of the total sample), larger
number still prefer to shop at kiryana store as opposed to the retail store.
4) T-test revealed some interesting facts. There exists a difference in the consumer
perception across a retail store and a kiryana store. This difference occurred across
variables such as:
Store has a good selection of merchandize
Availability of new fashionable products
greater variety of brands of products available
Store provides attractive schemes to make experience better
Possibility of finding all products to be purchased
Availability of grocery and green grocery under one roof
Store layout is good
Store is spacious and allows easy movement
Easy to search for the product desired
66
Advertisement/signage is attractive
Store is located nearby
Store is in good physical condition
Physical facilities in store are better
Store offer home delivery facility
Luxurious atmosphere of the store attracts
Easy exchange and return
Store has high class image
Store has high brand name
Greater happiness of shopping atmosphere
Availability of credit facility
5) Intention of repurchase is a significantly influenced by the good physical condition of
the store.
6) Salesperson related dimensions also play a significant role in the consumer’s decision
to repurchase from the store.
7) The factors amongst which all the variables for the retail store were categorized
include : Merchandise Characteristics, General Store Attributes, Policy, Reliability
and Physical Aspects
8) The factors amongst which all the variables for the kiryana store were categorized
include: Physical Aspects, General Store Attributes, Reliability, Merchandise
Characteristics and Monetary Benefits.
9) While studying the demographics affecting the recommending behavior of the
customers, it was observed that the kiryana store customers’ behavior had a
significant relation with their age.
10) It was observed that the monthly income parameter across the customer’s largely
influenced their repurchase from a retail store.
67
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
Each study becomes complete when it lays down a set of suggestions. Following are some of
the suggestions which store keepers (both retail as well as kiryana) should take into account
to improve service so as to induce greater customer satisfaction and to attain higher levels of
favorable perception in the minds of the consumers.
1) The study provides with a comprehensive list of the factors that influence the
consumer perception towards the two types of retail outlets. This would help to assess
the likely impact of any initiative in terms of its effect and importance on customer
retention.
2) In recent years, retail outlets have been making great efforts to improve service
quality to make customer return to the store. Rising expectations of service, quality
etc is an economic and social phenomenon. Moreover, customers are becoming
richer, more educated and better informed. Therefore, retail outlets must constantly
monitor customer expectations and not merely the performance as commonly done.
This can be conducted through customer surveys, depth interviews and other informal
means of research.
3) For kiryana store, store atmosphere, location, convenience of shopping, sales
personnel service have come out to be statistically significant so these are the areas
where one can make an improvement so as to retain the customers.
4) For retail store, the customers of think that Advertisement, availability of grocery and
green grocery under one roof, and greater happiness of shopping environment are
important. Thus these can be increased to increase store loyalty
5) Retail outlets should try to develop strategies that would enhance positive responses
and prohibit negative ones. Such strategies can include meeting the desired service
68
levels, preventing service problems, dealing effectively with the unsatisfied
customers and confronting customer complaints positively.
6) The role of customer-contact-personnel in the attainment of quality goals is of
paramount importance. Therefore, in their efforts to deliver high quality service to
customers’ store should not ignore the needs of their customer-contact employees
such as need for motivation, factors leading to satisfaction and commitment
enhancing factors.
7) Stores should focus on those factors which contribute more towards improving
perception of quality in mind of customers. In this way they can better understand the
needs of the customers and can satisfy those needs efficiently.
5.3 DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH
Although the study expands the knowledge of relationship between quality, satisfaction and
other factors, viable prospects for future research remains.
1) Future research efforts should concentrate in building a broader conceptual model of
factors that influence store loyalty. This can be achieved by including other variables,
such as the interaction of the buyer with the technology employed during the service.
2) I have investigated the respondents at particular point of time but to get more accurate
their views should be collected at regular intervals over a period of time.
3) Also, since the scope of the study was limited to mohali, a closer look at the
important factors influencing consumer perception can be obtained by conducting the
research on a larger geographic area.
69
REFERENCES
Ajith Paninchukannath, “Organized Supermarkets of South India” Indian Journal of Marketing May 2008
David L Laudon, Albert J Della Bitta – Consumer Behavior
Dr. C P Gupta, Mitali Chaturvedi – Retailing: An Emerging Trend in India- Indian Journal of Marketing June 2007
Gitanjali Bhatnagar – Retail Revolution- Indian Journal of Marketing November 2004
Henry Arsael- Consumer Behavior and Marketing Action
K Ambarish Kumar “ In-Store Influences on Shoppers” P.U.Management Review
Zeithaml V (1988), —Consumer Perception of Price, Quality and Value: A Means-End
Model and Synthesis of Evidence“, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52 (July)
70
ANNEXURE
71
Annexure A
QUESTIONNAIRE (After Pretest)
1. Gender 1. Male 2.Female
2. Age (in years): 1. 15-24 2. 25 - 34 3. 35~54 4. 55 and above
3. Occupation: 1. Student 2. House wife 3. Working 4. Other( please
specify)
4. Monthly Income: 1. <10,000 2. 10,001- 20,000 3. 20,001-30,000 4. >30,000
(in Rs.)
5.Following are certain statements regarding the retail store and mom n pop store
attributes. Kindly state your agreement or disagreement for the same as per the following
scale
1-Strongly Disagree 2- Disagree 3-Neither agree nor disagree 4- Agree 5- Strongly Agree
1 The store has a good selection of merchandise 1 2 3 4 5
2 The store offers excellent quality products relative to the
other stores1 2 3 4 5
3 The store offers excellent quality products relative to
price of the products1 2 3 4 5
4 The store offers low priced products 1 2 3 4 5
5 There is an availability of new (fashionable) products in
the store1 2 3 4 5
6 The store offers greater variety of brands of most
products1 2 3 4 5
7 The store frequently provides attractive gifts/schemes
which make the experience better1 2 3 4 5
8 There is a great possibility of finding all products which
are to be purchased1 2 3 4 5
9 Availability of groceries and green grocery under one 1 2 3 4 5
72
roof
10 The store layout is good 1 2 3 4 5
11 The store is spacious and allows easy movement 1 2 3 4 5
12 I am easily able to search for goods wanted. 1 2 3 4 5
13 The advertisements/signage in the store is very appealing 1 2 3 4 5
14 The store is located nearby 1 2 3 4 5
15 There is easy availability of parking 1 2 3 4 5
16 The store is in good physical condition 1 2 3 4 5
17 The physical facilities(shopping carts, elevator) at the
store are better1 2 3 4 5
18 The store offers Home Delivery option 1 2 3 4 5
19 There is a Luxurious atmosphere of lighting, color, and
other similar facilities attracts me to the store1 2 3 4 5
20 There is an easy return and exchange of goods 1 2 3 4 5
21 There are long queues/ long billing time 1 2 3 4 5
22 Availability of credit facility 1 2 3 4 5
23 The store has a high class image 1 2 3 4 5
24 The store has a high brand name 1 2 3 4 5
25 There is a greater happiness of shopping atmosphere 1 2 3 4 5
26 The salesperson at the store at courteous and kind 1 2 3 4 5
27 There is greater assistance of salesperson on product and
related information1 2 3 4 5
28 When the store promises to do something by a certain
time, it would do so.1 2 3 4 5
29 There is greater affirmative action and solution to
complaints by salesperson1 2 3 4 5
30 There is a high intention of repurchase from the store 1 2 3 4 5
31 I will recommend this store to someone who seeks my
advice.1 2 3 4 5
73
-------------------Thank You-------------------
74
75