8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
1/60
Public sphere in Latin America: A map of the historiography
Pablo Piccato
Columbia University
References to the public sphere appear increasingly often in studies of Latin American
history. The category is becoming natural without a debate about the consequences of its
backdoor entrance into historians vocabulary. The purpose of this essay is to bring out
its theoretical implications and to ask whether we can write a history of the public sphere
in Latin America. The answer, I will argue, is a cautious yes. To prove that the field is not
an invention requires care because it involves bringing together, probably against their
will, historians who operate from different perspectives and on different regions, periods
and themes; care is also advisable given the apparent differences between the literatures
produced in Spanish and English. In arguing that there is a common ground for research
in the field, the following pages will try to show that authors who work about the public
sphere with ostensibly diverse methodologies share a set of questions and premises that
amount, together, to a critical engagement with the theoretical model behind the category.
The scholars considered in the following pages share an interest in republican
modernization, state formation and the emergence of civil societies which is implied in
their use of public sphere. Otherwise, their agenda would not seem to depart from that
of a broader crowd of historians who examine the relations between society, culture and
politics in Latin America, yet centering their approaches on the notion of hegemony. This
essay will argue that testing the coordinates first laid out by Jrgen Habermas in The
Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere,1and more recently elaborated by
scholars working on the history of the public sphere in modern western societies, can
1I am in debt with Tom Klubock, Thom Rath, Federico Sor and Mary Kay Vaughan for their comments toearlier drafts. This paper was also discussed at the Columbia Universitys Department of History graduate-faculty workshop and at the New Schools workshop of Latin American Studies. I thank Karl Wennerlind,Herbert Sloan, Claudio Lomnitz and Paul Gootemberg for their comments.
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
2/60
generate a productive dialogue across interpretive paradigms. The result will be the map
of a province in recent Latin American historiography. As with any map, proximity will
not mean identity, and while not covering the entire country, its coordinates could apply
to areas beyond its marginsleaving to the user what direction to take.2
Such map is useful not only for historians. In the early twenty first century, the
legacy of Latin American neo-liberal modernization, particularly the dismantling of
welfare states in the wake of authoritarian regimes in the 1970s, gives a new centrality to
civil society and to the political voices emerging outside the traditional channels of
parties and corporative actors. During the 1990s liberalismo and democracia sin
adjetivos (i.e., political in the narrowest sense) seemed the way of the future, while
Marxism was dismissed as another brick on the Berlin wall. At the same time,
authoritarian technocrats invoked science (particularly economics) to impose drastic
reforms on states and economies. Yet lately electoral upsets and social movements in
Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Mexico, Uruguay and Venezuela express popular
dissatisfaction at the high cost of modernization from above. The entrance of new actors
into the public arena (ecologist peasants, indigenous movements, women and youth
NGOs, among others) challenges established explanations of political behavior, requiring
more sensitive tools to study the languages of dissent and mobilization. Scholars on the
left have seen in Antonio Gramsci a way to reconcile Marxism with an awareness of civil
society that was sorely lacking in revolutionary persuasions of earlier decades. Juan
Carlos Portantiero, for example, argues that the left can address the 1990s crisis of
2The danger, of course, is that of creating a Map of the Empire that was the size of the Empire andcoincided point by point with it un Mapa del Imperio, que tena el tamao del imperio y coincidapuntualmente con l. El rigor de la ciencia in Jorge Luis Borges, Obras completas II 1952-1972(Barcelona: Emec Editores, 1996). This map will have Mexico as the apparent center. A result of mybackground, I hope it can be excused as a geographic convention.
2
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
3/60
values and its own lack of mass politics by focusing its proposals on the public
sphere, . . . as the locus for the autonomous organization of a self-managed or
cooperative society. This involves, for him, building a new political culture not bound
by the logic of the market or the logic of the state, and a critique of the increasing
fragmentation and privatization of life.3
Renewed concern about civil society underlines another reason why questions
about the public sphere are useful today. Since the 1962 book until his most recent work,
Habermass contribution has been guided by an inquiry about the emancipatory potential
of politicsconsidered as a dialogue based on the use of reason and, consequently,unrestricted access and the absence of coercion. The normative implication of this
definition requires a new look at the relationship between politics and culture. The task is
today as urgent as ever since the electoral success of the right in the United States stems
in part from a manipulation of cultural themes (labeled morality in exit polls) which
seem to have greater impact on voters than economic rationality or the preservation of
civil rights. Is it time for liberal scholars to reconsider the emphasis on culture and
identity, that has presided over humanities during the last decades, and rescue the
connections between meaning and social structure? Democrats and others on the left in
the United States stress the need to react to Republican manipulation of culture by
articulating more clearly the basic ideas about class and justice that are at the core of their
political tradition since the New Deal.4
3 Juan Carlos Portantiero, "Foundations of a New Politics," Report on the Americas 25, no. 5 (1991): 19.See Jrgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, Studies incontemporary German social thought (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987), 37. Juan Carlos Portantiero,"Foundations of a New Politics," Report on the Americas 25, no. 5 (1991): 19; Chantal Mouffe and ErnestoLaclau, Hegemona y estrategia socialista: Hacia una radicalizacin de la democracia, trans. ErnestoLaclau (Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Econmcia, 2004).4 For Alan Brinkley Democrats need to turn much of their attention away from culture and back towardclass. Alan Brinkley, "Whats Next? The mourning period is over. Now, four simple guidelines for
3
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
4/60
The goal of the following pages is to use the category of public sphere as a
historiographical detonator, to borrow Habermass expression, rather than trying to
build a new paradigm. The interdisciplinary use of the concept after the 1962 book
indeed defies the reification of lines of research into unrelated subsystems of
knowledge of contemporary academic work.5 Some historians, however, often read
Habermass public sphere as a merely descriptive, Weberian ideal type rather than a key
component of a broader theory. This is understandable if we keep in mind the obvious
anachronism of the term public sphere, which was not in use until the twentieth
century.
6
Why not simply talk, then, about publicity or public opinion? One reason togo beyond a descriptive use is the need to engage contemporary attempts, cited above, to
identify and understand the public sphere as a discrete realm of democratic life. And
recognizing present needs does not preclude (quite the opposite) considering the full
theoretical implications of the category. I propose that, for historians of Latin America,
this specifically means bringing The Structural Transformation and subsequent ideas
becoming a majority party.," The American Prospect Online Edition, January 2004. See also forum on theelection in The Nation, December 20 2004, http://www.thenation.com/issue.mhtml?i=20041220. SeeJurgen Habermas, "Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification," in Moralconsciousness and communicative action (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990). For the normativeimplications of the public sphere model, Nancy Fraser, "Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution tothe Critique of Actually Existing Democracy," Social Text, no. 25/26 (1990). See also Thomas A.McCarthy, The critical theory of Jrgen Habermas, 1st MIT Press paperback ed. (Cambridge, Mass.: MITPress, 1981), chap. 1; Jrgen Habermas, Ciencia y tcnica como "ideologa"(Mexico City: Rei, 1993).Implicit in Habermass idea of communicative rationality is the central experience of the unconstrained,unifying, consensus-bringing force of argumentative speech. Jurgen Habermas, The Theory ofCommunicative Action Vol. 1 Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. Thomas McCarthy (Boston:Beacon Press, 1984), 10.5
Arthur Strum, "A Bibliography on the Concept of ffentlichkeit," New German Critique 61 (1994).Habermas refers to seminal theories, as those by Freud and Marx, that inserted a genuinelyphilosophical idea like a detonator into a particular context of research resulting in hybrid discoursesthat may be criticized from the academic establishment but could generate new research traditions.Jurgen Habermas, "Philosophy as Stand-In and Interpreter," in Moral consciousness and communicativeaction, Studies in contemporary German social thought(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990), 15.6 The OED provides two examples of the term, both dated in 1992. See entries Maternalize andNonsensification. "Oxford English Dictionary," Oxford University Press, http://www.oed.com/. Theparallel with Weber in Joan B. Landes, Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution(Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988), 10.
4
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
5/60
about communicative action into a dialogue with the Gramscian concept of hegemony. In
order to do that, it is useful to examine the multiple ways in which scholars of other
regions have recast the initial formulation of the model.7The following pages are less
about theory, therefore, than about a historiographical response to a detonator; thus,
they take public sphere beyond its descriptive function and examine its theoretical and
methodological potential.
First, an outline of the model. Since the basic blueprint but particularly in recent
usage of the category, public sphere refers to an unfinished historical transformation
rather than a stable structure. Two processes, evolving at different rhythms, converged inthe emergence of a bourgeois public sphere. The first was the gradual development of
capitalist markets, requiring the reliable circulation of commodities and information.
Literacy and print were central aspects of that circulation, as well as the development of
national states that would regulate and guarantee exchanges. The second process was the
emergence of spaces of social life, media and themes of discussion that brought together
autonomous individuals who believed in their social and cultural equality. Courts, salons,
newspapers, and cafes organized debates where private men and women used their taste
and their reason to judge theater, literature, science and government performance.
Personal reputations were the object of public critical questioningeven though the
bourgeois ideal involved bracketing differences of status. At the convergence of both
processes, the public sphere was the universally accessible conceptual space where
private citizens came together to discuss matters of common interest, on the assumption
that reason, the only requisite, was evenly distributed, and that their voices would have an7 Habermas himself links the public sphere with his theory of communicative action at a fundamentallevel. Jrgen Habermas, "Further Reflections on the Public Sphere," in Habermas and the Public Sphere,ed. Craig Calhoun (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1997), 422, 41. Other scholars, mentioned below, have alreadysuggested the need to confront analyses based on Gramsci and Habermas.
5
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
6/60
impact on public opinion. In doing so, they not only represented their private interests,
but established a new bridge between three areas of life: the private realms of domesticity
and work, the publicity required to exchange opinions with others in civil society, and the
state. Revolutions in France and the American colonies marked the politicization of the
public sphere, in a process that expanded geographically throughout the nineteenth
century.
Political representation has since then continued to develop, although recurrent
cycles of exclusion and authoritarianism remind us that the public sphere is an ideal as
much as a reality, a normative as much as a descriptive framework. During the twentiethcentury, the development of mass media linked to stronger states and corporate interests
exercised an increasing influence on the public sphere, furthering the privatization of life
and the fragmentation of civil society to the extent that the survival of the public sphere
as an autonomous and unitary space seemed precarious enough, by the end of the century,
to become an object of discussion for those concerned with democracy and social justice.
The chronology and boundaries of the entire process are blurry: the public sphere is also
the site of continuing reflection about its own rules and membership, about the links
between private and public, about collective and individual identities, and about the
proper interaction among politics, culture and reason.8
8 Habermas initial definition is tentative and contains the diversity of issues outlined above: The bourgeois
public sphere may be conceived above all as the sphere of private people come together as a public; theysoon claimed the public sphere regulated from above against the public authorities themselves, to engagethem in a debate over the general rules governing relations in the basically privatized but publicly relevantsphere of commodity exchange and social labor. The medium of this political confrontation was peculiarand without historical precedent: peoples public use of their reason. Jrgen Habermas, The StructuralTransformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (Cambridge, Mass.:MIT, 1991), 27. See also Jurgen Habermas, "The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article," New GermanCritique, no. 3 (1974). On the historical character of the definition, see Moishe Postone, "Political Theoryand Historical Analysis," in Habermas and the public sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun, Studies in contemporaryGerman social thought(Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992).
6
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
7/60
The research questions that scholars have derived from this narrative offer the
possibility of understanding politics beyond the dichotomy of a realm of power and
institutions, and another of markets and interests. Asking about the public sphere helps
place civil society in the void between political society and the market opened by
traditional narratives. Parties and representation are important research themes but they
are less useful in situations where political legitimacy itself becomes the object of
debates, and people begin asking who speaks for them and why. What are the rules to
include or exclude interlocutors from such debate? As we will see, historians of Latin
America are bringing those questions to the earliest phases of the regions independentlife in order to explain the subdivision of polities after the end of colonial rule, in the
process throwing light on the persistence of democracy in spite of inequality and
violence.
What have these and other historians done to the model? Built upon the
historiography available at the time, Structural Transformation does not always survive
unscathed the close examination of graduate history seminars. Its empirical shortcomings
have prompted research projects that test its descriptive uses, taking it as a canvass to be
completed rather than as a critical engagement with existing master narratives. James
Van Horn Melton, for example, looks closely at the conditions for the emergence of
educated audiences, particularly the privatization of the domestic realm, in eighteenth-
century Western Europe. He criticizes Habermas for the lack of chronological precision
and the influence of a rather conventional Marxism in his assumptions about a
bourgeois identity that later historiography has found elusive. The historical materialism
of the Marxist Habermas, Melton argues, cannot be reconciled with the concern in the
7
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
8/60
Kantian Habermas about the progress of enlightenment.9 What in Structural
Transformation was a sketch, in Meltons work comes out as a detailed empirical agenda
that includes the emergence of reading publics, the development of their critical
judgment (first in theater then in literature), and the rise of spaces of sociability (salons,
taverns, coffeehouses).10
The most important historical qualification to the model is the recognition that, in
practice, universal access to and status-bracketing within the public sphere were
undermined by exclusions, mainly concerning gender and class.11 While Habermas had
already noted the role of women in the literary public sphere, feminist scholars haveexamined gendered exclusions from the standpoint of politics itselfinstead of
unmediated effects of family and economic structures. For Joan Landes, womens
exclusion was an essential aspect of the public sphere emerged of the French Revolution.
The models artificial distinction between public and private realms, she argues, reduces
womens intervention in public discussions to expressing particular, domestic concerns,
leaving men to voice universal interests and reason.12 Other historians of enlightened
Europe respond that women were indeed included to a high degree, and that the
public/private dichotomy was less hermetic than authors like Landes and Sarah Maza
9 James Van Horn Melton, The Rise of the Public in Enlightenment Europe, New approaches to Europeanhistory (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 10, 12.10 For similar agendas see E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (New York: RandomHouse, 1966); Richard Sennett, The Fall of Public Man (New York: Knopf, 1977).11 Geoff Eley, "Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century," in
Culture/Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory, ed. Nicholas B. Dirks, Geoff Eley, andSherry B. Ortner (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994). The essay also in Craig J. Calhoun,Habermas and the Public Sphere, Studies in contemporary German social thought (Cambridge, Mass.: MITPress, 1992).12 Joan B. Landes, "The Public and the Private Sphere: A Feminist Reconsideration," in Feminism, thePublic and the Private, ed. Joan B. Landes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 2, 142-43. See alsoCraig Calhoun, "Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere," in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed.Craig Calhoun (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1997), 34-35; Seyla Benhabib, "Models of Public Space: HannahArendt, the Liberal Tradition, and Jrgen Habermas," in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. CraigCalhoun (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1997), 92.
8
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
9/60
were willing to recognize. For Keith Michael Baker and Harold Mah, exclusion was a
contingent trait of the public sphere since the normative premise of universal access
included women.13 Beyond the role of women, Habermas proposes that public and private
were mutually constitutive categories. The invention of a self-contained realm of
domesticity allowed the bourgeois to deny his own interests and become a universal
homme outside that realm.14 The feminist critique, in other words, is an inevitable part of
the theory itself. In order to understand the eventual exclusion of women from public
opinion, in spite of their role in court life and salons, authors like Roger Chartier and
Arlette Farge incorporate cultural analysis and an interest in language into an effort tounderstand historical constructions of reason and irrationality as key chapters of modern
political history.15 Such research on the contingent quality of basic political and cultural
categories brings together phenomena usually studied separately: elite and popular
sociabilities and the emergence of diverse audiences and identities; the role of print and
mass media in politics, but also of gossip and other oral forms; the changing symbolic
and institutional values of representation, and the circulation of diverse cultural products.
The public sphere places these subjects at the intersection of economic, social, political
and cultural domains isolated in traditional historical studies.1613 Harold Mah, "Phantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of Historians," Journal ofModern History 72, no. 1 (2000). I owe this reference to Samuel Moyn.14 Habermas, Structural Transformation, 27, 55; Melton, The Rise; Daniel Gordon, "Philosophy, Sociology,and Gender in the Enlightenment Conception of Public Opinion," French Historical Studies 17, no. 4(1992): 889, 901; Keith Michael Baker, "Defining the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century France:Variations on a Theme by Habermas," in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun (Cambridge,
Mass.: MIT, 1997), 202.15 Roger Chartier, The Cultural Origins of the French Revolution (tr. Lydia G. Cochrane. Durham: DukeUniversity Press, 1991); Arlette Farge, Subversive Words: Public Opinion in Eighteenth-Century France,trans. Rosemary Morris (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994). See also Landes,Women and the Public Sphere; Keith Michael Baker, Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on FrenchPolitical Culture in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990); Sarah C.Maza, Private Lives and Public Affairs: The Causes Clbres of Prerrevolutionary France (Berkeley:University of California Press, 1993).16 For a bibliography of the diversity of work, historical and otherwise, inspired by the model see Strum, "ABibliography on the Concept of ffentlichkeit." A similar census would be probably impossible today. See
9
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
10/60
Public sphere in Latin American history
Historians of Latin America have not merely consumed the public sphere model, and the
survey above fails to provide a useful guide into the increasingly rich historiography on
the development of the public sphere in the region. Latin American history is a
particularly promising arena to engage the category with other interpretive models
because of the ongoing reappraisal of democracy in the region. Political change, for
example, is increasingly understood as cultural change. Identity, particularly ethnic and
racial identifications (largely untouched by the European debates as forms of exclusionfrom the public sphere), is more explicitly a terrain of debate through the vindication of
indigenous rights and the return of national claims in the face of an aggressive capitalist
modernizationalthough indigenismo and nationalism are no longer considered in
opposition to globalized modernity but as specific appropriations of it. As a consequence,
cultural historians have brought to the attention of the profession the need to consider the
historical character and political meaning of cultures and identities. The category of the
public sphere is useful in this context because it provides a sharper focus on politics than
the notion of culture, and a potentially productive terrain to engage interpretive categories
such as hegemony. By narrowing the discussion to specific questions about the
relationship between meaning, communication and politics, the public sphere model has
already proven its ability to detonate, or at least fuel, productive research agendas on
culture andpolitics.17
also Peter Uwe Hohendahl, "The Public Sphere: Models and Boundaries," in Habermas and the PublicSphere, ed. Craig Calhoun (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1997), 108. For an example of these possibilities seeMadeleine Hurd, Public Spheres, Public Mores, and Democracy: Hamburg and Stockholm, 1870-1914,Social history, popular culture, and politics in Germany (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000).17 A discussion of the implications of this from the point of view of Mexican history in Pablo Piccato,"Introduccin: Modelo para armar? Hacia un acercamiento crtico a la teora de la esfera pblica," in
10
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
11/60
Franois-Xavier Guerras work on the revolutions of independence in Spanish
America, particularly Modernidad e independencias, placed the public sphere at the heart
of the process of nation-building by suggesting that the birth of new nations out of
Spains American kingdoms was the product of the emergence of multiple politicized
public spheres in administrative and commercial centers after the 1808 crisis. Writing and
reading had a sense of political urgency that did not come, as in Europe, from the
brewing of bourgeois conversations in salons and coffee shops. In Guerras view,
American subjects need to publicly judge governance, science and reason had its origins
in the eighteenth century, when the Bourbons decided to treat their American domains ascolonies, rather than kingdoms of the same status as those in the Peninsula. The reforms
prompted Americans to express grievances that, although modern in their publicity, were
couched in the egalitarian notion of a pact between subjects and crown. The conquest-era
political centrality of municipalities returned in the eighteenth century in the form of a
pactist nostalgia behind the first wave of unrest and the emergence of local juntas.
While in the past the rights of Creole and Spanish residents of American cities did not
need to be defended publicly, suddenly they became the unifying theme of the
politicization of public discourse and the expansion of the periodic press.18
Freedom of the press, ayuntamiento (city council) debates, and Creoles
participation in the Cdiz courts were key political events because they created pueblos
or, more accurately, displaced the terms meaning from the local to the national: towns
Actores, espacios y debates en la historia de la esfera pblica en la ciudad de Mxico, ed. CristinaSacristn and Pablo Piccato (Mexico City: Instituto Mora, 2005). See also Hispanic American HistoricalReview 79, no. 2 (1999); Pablo Piccato, "Conversacin con los Difuntos: Una Perspectiva Mexicana ante elDebate sobre la Historia Cultural," Signos Histricos, no. 8 (2002).18 Franois-Xavier Guerra, Modernidad e independencias: Ensayos sobre las revoluciones hispnicas, 3aed., Colecciones MAPFRE 1492 (Madrid, Mexico City: Editorial MAPFRE; Fondo de Cultura Econmica,2000), 117; Francois-Xavier Guerra, Mxico: del Antiguo Rgimen a la Revolucin (Mexico City: Fondode Cultura Econmica, 1988).
11
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
12/60
were now peoples. New, politicized public spheres provided American pueblos with a
common set of political vocabularies and objectives that fueled political mobilization for
and against independence; they reached as far as the influence of the emerging political
leadership in cities like Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Bogot, in the process bringing
together diverse populations into publics, and generating a sense of nationhood and
unified popular will. Ifel pueblo was still a fiction constructed and represented by
minorities, the debates and practices that constituted it, argued Guerra, are central objects
of historical research. From a similar perspective, Carmen McEvoy characterizes the
political process of state building in Peru in the form of an intense dialogue in thecultural sphere. From the beginning, the press pondered on the value of public opinion
and tried to shape it, thus shifting relations between power and writing.19 In these studies,
early Latin American public spheres become more relevant foci of research than the
struggling states and fragmented civil societies evolving around them.
The above description contains an emphasis that is not central in Modernidad e
independencias. While Guerra explicitly used the notion of the public sphere and referred
to Structural Transformation, his direct historiographical inspiration came from the
expanded history of the political proposed by Franois Furet and other historians of the19 Carmen McEvoy, La utopa republicana: Ideales y realidades en la formacin de la cultura polticaperuana, 1871-1919, 1a ed. (Lima, Per: Pontificia Universidad Catlica del Per, 1997), 11; CarmenMcEvoy, "'Seramos excelentes vasallos y nunca ciudadanos': prensa republicana y cambio social en Lima,1791-1822," in The Political Power of the Word: Press and Oratory in Nineteenth-Century Latin America,ed. Ivan Jaksic (London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 2002), 37. See also Richard A. Warren,Vagrants and citizens : politics and the masses in Mexico City from Colony to Republic, Latin American
silhouettes (Wilmington, Del.: SR Books, 2001), 170. After independence, Lo radicalmente nuevo es lacreacin de una escena pblica.Guerra, Modernidad e independencias, 13, 23, 87. This parallels BenedictAndersons claim that the convergence of capitalism and print technology . . . created the possibility of anew form of imagined community, which in its basic morphology set the stage for the modern nation, andhis focus on American creole identities as early examples of this process. Benedict Anderson, ImaginedCommunities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (New York-Londres: Verso, 1983), 46.Concepts like el pueblo orlo pblico also had a history that illustrated the incorporation of traditional andmodern notions, as explored by Annick Lemprire. Annick Lemprire, "Reflexiones sobre laterminologa poltica del liberalismo," in Construccin de la legitimidad poltica en Mxico, ed. CarlosIllades, Brian Connaughton, and Sonia Prez Toledo (Zamora: Colegio de Michoacn, 1999).
12
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
13/60
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
14/60
intersection of culture, which he defined by its autonomy from the socioeconomic
realm, and politics, and concluded that modern elite sociabilities were the key to the
Spanish American experience. With the public sphere, he claimed, emerged a group of
men of the word and the pen who created public opinion.23 Literate, secular,
enlightened, exposed to French influence through travel and reading, these men were at
the forefront of that cultural mutation which is modernity.24 Disconnected from class
relations and economic grievances or interests, Guerras modernization worked its way
from elites in a descending way to other social groups.25 Modernity was, in Guerras
perspective, coherent, socially restrictive, and unequivocal in the European direction ofits mutations.
Looking at the vocabulary of republicanism, historians of the public sphere in
Spanish America explore, in the words of Carmen McEvoy, a cultural texture much
more rich and complex than that provided by the classic liberal interpretation.26
Republicanism itself is the process of interaction between a vocabulary, associated to a
specific ethos, and the sphere of public opinion, incarnated in men of the pen and the
sword like Juan Espinosa, author of a 1855 republican lexicon edited by McEvoy.
Sociability here becomes a sharper category, that involves the social conditions for the
23 Guerra, Modernidad e independencias, 17, 91, 234. For others, the Habermasian focus on a new,autonomous, free, and sovereign public implies a marked alternative from Furets Tocquevillian emphasison associations and modes of sociability as the base for a modern public opinion. Chartier, CulturalOrigins, 16-17.24
Guerra, Modernidad e independencias, 52.25 Guerra, Modernidad e independencias, 99. Guerras emphasis on culture fits well with older visions ofLatin American culture as something clearly identifiable; for Edmundo OGorman, this common identitymeant that the influence of the United States is negligible in the emergence of a Latin American politicalculture. Edmundo O'Gorman, "Hegel y el moderno panamericanismo," Letras de Mxico 2, no. 8 (1939).See Charles Hale, "Edmundo O'Gorman y la historia nacional," Signos Histricos 2, no. 3 (2000): 17, 24.Absent is a problematization of neocolonialism as an informal and subordinate mode of entering modernity.Tulio Halpern Donghi, The Contemporary History of Latin America, trans. John Charles Chasteen, LatinAmerica in translation/en traduccin/em traduo (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1993).26 McEvoy, La utopa republicana, 11.
14
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
15/60
production of fighting words: cultural markets, patronage by bureaucrats and other urban
neighbors, and the work of printers as key cultural entrepreneurs.27 The results go beyond
discourse. State building after independence, from this angle, was part of a larger
civilizing process in which el pueblo went from a rhetorical community to a political
community.28
The focus on the language of politics in recent intellectual histories of early Latin
American polities results in a critical reassessment of the teleology of modernization and
a less optimistic account of a transition from old structures to partial modernity.
According to Rafael Rojas, while new audiences emerged as a consequence ofenlightened discussions since 1808, political discourse continued to be generated within
viceroyal bodies and according to the corporative imaginary. Hence, those audiences
were not true expressions of modern citizenship. If the revolution of independence had
any meaning as a social movement, argues Rojas, it was because of the building of a
modern public sphereparadoxically based on secret societies, local conspiracies,
armed bands, opinion groups, provincial assemblies and parliamentary factions in
Cdiz.29 Rojas echoes Guerras view of elites as creators and incarnation ofel pueblo yet
argues that independence cannot be characterized as a democratic cultural mutation but
as a paradoxical renewal of monarchism through republicanism. Classical republicanism
had been in the minds of modernizing elites, of course, but, claims Rojas, it was a largely
traditional view of monarchical order that opened the public sphere.30 For Jos Antonio
27 McEvoy, "Seramos excelentes vasallos." Similar insights, to be examined below, in Angel Rama, TheLettered City, trans. John Charles Chasteen (Durham: Duke University Press, 1996).28 McEvoy, "Seramos excelentes vasallos."29 Rafael Rojas, La escritura de la independencia: El surgimiento de la opinin pblica en Mxico, 1st ed.(Mexico City: Taurus--Centro de Investigacin y Docencia Econmicas, 2003), 17, 34, 35, 62.30 Rojas, La escritura, 35. See also Fernando Escalante, Ciudadanos imaginarios: Memorial de los afanes ydesventuras de la virtud y apologa del vicio triunfante en la Repblica Mexicana: Tratado de Moral
Pblica (Mexico: Colegio de Mxico, 1993). For recent studies of monarchist sentiment in Mexico see
15
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
16/60
Aguilar, this stress on the republican tradition, incarnated in local liberties and virt with
deeper roots than Enlightenment sociabilities, constitutes a critique of national narratives
centered on liberalism and its epidermic anti-monarchism.31 Republicanism was less
about democratic representation than about the pragmatic means to achieve balance
between new and old powers.32
This new interest in republicanism in Latin America involves an attempt to
redraw disciplinary boundaries and vindicate the autonomy of the intellectual realm. For
Elas Jos Palti, intellectual history provides a much-needed updating for a Latin
American historiography that had remained at the margins of the linguistic turn.
33
Paltilocates public opinion at the center of a study of the connections between ideological
conflict, public debates and vocabularies, and political legitimacy. Latin American public
opinions expressed the hope of national unity but were also the product of fractious
polities, yet understanding political discourse requires going beyond the analysis of
Erika Pani, Para mexicanizar el Segundo Imperio: el imaginario poltico de los imperialistas, 1. ed.(Mxico, D.F.: Colegio de Mxico Centro de Estudios Histricos : Instituto de Investigaciones Dr. Jos
Mara Luis Mora, 2001); Elas Jos Palti, ed., La poltica del disenso: La "polmica en torno almonarquismo" (Mxico, 1848-1850)... y las aporas del liberalismo (Mexico City: Fondo de CulturaEconmica, 1998). If in the end the new nations rejected liberal monarchism, explains Rojas, it wasbecause of the revolutionary logic of insurgency and the consequent loyalist response, but not because ofany inherently democratic feature of the new public sphere. Rojas, La escritura, 49.31 Jos Antonio Aguilar, "Dos conceptos de repblica," in El republicanismo en hispanoamrica: Ensayosde historia intelectual y poltica, ed. Jos Antonio Aguilar and Rafael Rojas (Mexico City: Centro deInvestigacin y Docencia ; Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 2002), 63. See Jos Antonio Aguilar and RafaelRojas, eds., El republicanismo en hispanoamrica: Ensayos de historia intelectual y poltica, 1a ed.,Seccin de obras de historia (Mexico City: Centro de Investigacin y Docencia ; Fondo de CulturaEconmica, 2002), 7; McEvoy, "Seramos excelentes vasallos," 43.32 For the tradicin republicana as the center of a long-term political history of Mexico that stresses localand corporative representation over democracy and equality, see Alicia Hernndez Chvez, La tradicin
republicana del buen gobierno, 1. ed., Seccin de obras de historia (Mxico, D.F.: El Colegio de Mxico :Fideicomiso Historia de las Amricas : Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 1993); Antonio Annino, "Ciudadanaversus gobernabilidad republicana en Mxico: Los orgenes de un dilema," in Ciudadana poltica yformacin de las naciones: Perspectivas histricas de Amrica Latina, ed. Hilda Sbato (Mexico City: Fce,1999). For a similar perspective (the intellectual history a la Cambridge, invoked by Aguilar), see Gordon,"Philosophy, Sociology, and Gender," 883-85, 88, 91.33 Elas Jos Palti, "Las polmicas en el liberalismo argentino: Sobre virtud, republicanismo y lenguaje," inEl republicanismo en hispanoamrica: Ensayos de historia intelectual y poltica, ed. Jos Antonio Aguilarand Rafael Rojas (Mexico City: Centro de Investigacin y Docencia ; Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 2002),167.
16
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
17/60
discourse as expression of factional conflict and probing the conditions of possibility of
enunciations. This is no longer about finding the right label (liberal, conservative,
modern, traditional, republican, monarchical, etc.) but about apprehending the moment of
generalized politics that followed independence, when even the basic principles of
political order could be debated.34
Paltis proposes a reconsideration of the arch of nineteenth-century political
history. Mexican public opinion underwent a transformation from a predominantly oral
judicial public opinion that worked as the tribunal of opinion, adjudicating debate
through the accumulation of arguments rather than seeking an ultimate truth, to a moreunified and autonomous strategic or proselytistic public opinion: explicitly partisan,
more coherent and able, later in the nineteenth century, to finally build a stable legitimacy
with a deliberate use of the technology of writing.35Methodologically, this implies
greater attention to the heuristic value of conflict and rhetoric. The judicial public opinion
did not operate on the assumption of unanimity, Palti argues, but in an agonistic mode of
constant defense and attack. Early ideologues despised political parties, which were
supposed to discipline opinion, because reason had to be unencumbered by loyalties in
order to judge the performance of government, however nasty the results; honesty and
autonomy were more important than programmatic coherence. Power intervened in
34 Elas Jos Palti, La invencin de una legitimidad: Razn y retrica en el pensamiento mexicano del sigloXIX (Un estudio sobre las formas del discurso poltico) (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 2005).35
Elas Jos Palti, "La transformacin del liberalismo mexicano en el siglo XIX: Del modelo jurdico de laopinin pblica al modelo estratgico de la sociedad civil," in Actores, espacios y debates en la historia dela esfera pblica en la ciudad de Mxico, ed. Pablo Piccato and Cristina Sacristn (Mexico City: InstitutoMora, 2005). See also chapters in Carlos Illades and Kuri Ariel Rodrguez, eds., Instituciones y ciudad.Ocho estudios histricos sobre la ciudad de Mxico (Mexico City: FP-SONES-Unos, 2000); BrianConnaughton, Carlos Illades, and Sonia Prez Toledo, eds., La construccin de la legitimidad poltica enMxico (Mexico City: El Colegio de Michoacn-Universidad Autnoma Metropolitana-UniversidadNacional Autnoma de Mxico-El Colegio de Mxico, 1999). On France and public opinion see Baker,Inventing the French Revolution; Mona Ozouf, "Le concept d'opinion publique au XVIIIme sicle," inL'Homme rgnr. Essais sur la Rvolution franaise (Paris: Gallimard, 1989); Farge, Subversive Words.
17
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
18/60
public opinion later in the century by manipulating and creating news and subjects, and
stressing social organization over autonomy.36Such analyses throw new light on a
nineteenth-century press that national histories had simplified to the confrontation
between conservatives and liberals.37 Rhetoric becomes more than an aesthetic aspect of
language: for Jorge Myers, the history of public opinion in Argentina is that of the
Buenos Aires elites efforts to legitimize its rule and offer an alternative to the sacred
authority monopolized by the pulpit. In the process, those elites hypostatized reason and
36 Palti, La invencin de una legitimidad, 301; Elas Jos Palti, "La Sociedad Filarmnica del Pito: pera,prensa y poltica en la Repblica Restaurada (Mxico, 1867-1876)" (paper presented at the Construccionesimpresas. Diarios, peridicos y revistas en la formacin de los estados nacionales en Amrica Latina yEstados Unidos (1820-1920), Buenos Aires, May 2002); Palti, "La transformacin del liberalismo." Guerra,however, noted the importance of discussion to reach the verdad social in a process that links private andpublic realms and contradictory interests. Unanimity, as in Paltis scheme, is only reached later. Guerra,Modernidad e independencias, 270-71, 73. For similar processes in Argentina, Palti, "Las polmicas." Thejudicial mode of public opinion provides a useful framework for the recent interest in the history ofrhetoric from its colonial, mostly religious uses, to the nineteenth-century uses of oratory in the building ofnationalism. Ivan Jaksic, The Political Power of the Word: Press and Oratory in Nineteenth-Century LatinAmerica (London: Institute of Latin American Studies, 2002).37 See also Elas Jos Palti, "Introduccin," in La poltica del disenso: La "polmica en torno almonarquismo" (Mxico, 1848-1850)... y las aporas del liberalismo, ed. Elas Jos Palti (Mexico City:Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 1998); Elas Jos Palti, "La Sociedad Filarmnica del Pito. pera, prensa ypoltica en la Repblica Restaurada (Mxico, 1867-1976)," Historia Mexicana 52, no. 4 (2003); Elas JosPalti, "Los diarios y el sistema poltico mexicano en tiempos de la Repblica Restaurada (1867-1876)," inConstrucciones impresas. Panfletos, diarios y revistas en la formacin de los estados nacionales en
Amrica Latina, 1820-1920, ed. Paula Alonso (Buenos Aires: FCE, 2004). On the increasing interest in thehistory of the press in Latin America see Paula Alonso, ed., Construcciones impresas: Panfletos, diarios yrevistas en la formacin de los estados nacionales en Amrica Latina, 1820-1920 (Buenos Aires: FCE,2004); Jaksic, The Political Power of the Word; Florence Toussaint Alcaraz, Escenario de la prensa en elPorfiriato, 1. ed. ed. (Mexico City: Fundacion Manuel Buenda-Universidad de Colima, 1989); MiguelAngel Castro and Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico. Seminario de Bibliografa Mexicana delSiglo XIX., eds., Tipos y caracteres : la prensa mexicana (1822-1855) ; memoria del coloquio celebradolos das 23, 24 y 25 septiembre de 1998, 1. ed. (Mxico: Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliogrficas
Seminario de Bibliografa Mexicana del Siglo XIX Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico, 2001);Martha Celis de la Cruz, "El empresario Vicente Garca Torres (1811-1894)," in Tipos y caracteres : laprensa mexicana (1822-1855) ; memoria del coloquio celebrado los das 23, 24 y 25 septiembre de 1998,ed. Miguel Angel Castro (Mxico: Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliogrficas Seminario de BibliografaMexicana del Siglo XIX Universidad Nacional Autnoma de Mxico, 2001); Moises Ochoa Campos,Resea histrica del periodismo mexicano (Mexico: Porrua, 1968); Mara Cruz Seoane, Oratoria yperiodismo en Espaa del siglo XIX(Valencia: Fundacin Juan March, 1977); Mara del Carmen RuizCastaeda et al., El periodismo en Mxico: 450 aos de historia, ed. (Mexico City: EditorialTradicin, 1974); Moises Guzman Prez, "Practiques de sociabilit et de lecture en Nouvelle-Espagne:L'evche de Michoacn (1870-1810)," Bulletin de L'Institut Pierre Renouvin, no. 17 (2003).
18
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
19/60
made it a militant actor in the confrontation against barbarianism and the enemies of las
luces.38
Modernity, particularly in Guerras works, can become a limiting canvass that, for
example, tends to leave aside a key pre-independence field of debate, source of rhetorical
devises and sponsor of the expansion of printed media: religion. Religious education,
social practices and associations, deeply rooted in the colonial period, remained essential
in political and intellectual life throughout the nineteenth centuryand they did not
necessarily exclude democratic contents. Colonial debates and political disputes centered
on theology (such as the confrontation between bishop of Puebla Juan de Palafox yMendoza and the Jesuits in the seventeenth century) suggest the existence of a public
sphere of sorts before independence.39 Further research on colonial-era debates and
political dissent is probably a matter of expanding students ability to break codes
(theology, Latin, canonical law, architecture, ritual practices) that national-era historians
are reluctant to take on.40 The open-ended political analysis encouraged by the public
38 Jorge Myers, "Las paradojas de la opinin: El discurso poltico rivadaviano y sus dos polos: El "gobiernode las luces" y "la opinin pblica, reina del mundo"," in La vida poltica en la Argentina del siglo XIX :armas, votos y voces, ed. Hilda Sabato and Alberto Rodolfo Lettieri (Mxico ; Estados Unidos de Amrica; Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 2003), 80, 88, 93; Jos Elas Palti, "Recent studies on theemergence of a Public sphere in Latin America," Latin American Research Review 36, no. 2 (2001). On thepolitical role of reason see McCarthy, The critical theory of Jrgen Habermas.39 See Silvia Arrom, "Una nueva sociabilidad femenina: Las seoras de la caridad de San Vicente de Paul,1863-1910" (paper presented at the V Seminario Internacional Sobre la Experiencia Institucional de laCiudad de Mxico: las Sociabilidades en la ciudad de Mxico del siglo XIX a la Revolucin,, Mexico City,23 de junio de 2005 2005); Guzman Prez, "Practiques de sociabilit; Carlos A. Forment, Democracy in
Latin America, 1760-1900, Morality and society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003); CarlosHerrejn Peredo, "Sermones y discursos del primer imperio," in Construccin de la legitimidad poltica enMxico, ed. Carlos Illades, Brian Connaughton, and Sonia Prez Toledo (Zamora: Colegio de Michoacn,1999). After independence, the influence of Rome became strong enough to become hegemonic only late inthe nineteenth century. On Palafox and the Jesuits Charles E. P. Simmons, "Palafox and His Critics:Reappraising a Controversy," Hispanic American Historical Review 46, no. 4 (1966).40 See for example William B. Taylor, Magistrates of the Sacred: Priests and Parishioners in Eighteenth-Century Mexico (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1996); Nora E. Jaffary, False Mystics:Deviant Orthodoxy in Colonial Mexico, Engendering Latin America (Lincoln: University of NebraskaPress, 2004).
19
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
20/60
sphere model might turn out be useful to explore the diversity and hierarchies of baroque
political cultures.
Espaol o ingls?
Palti, Guerra, Myers and other researchers are indeed transforming scholarly approaches
to nineteenth-century Latin American political and intellectual history.41 Yet there does
not seem to be a strong dialogue between the practitioners of cultural history in the U.S
and historians of the esfera pblica, a conversation that would point to common research
questions or an open confrontation of interpretive paradigms. It would be myopic todismiss Guerra and others because their political affiliations depart from those of
progressive scholars.42A sounder, frequently cited reason is the teleological
implication of Guerras emphasis on a dichotomy of tradition against modernity, yet this
is not the case for all the studies cited above.43 Fundamentally, I believe, the reluctance of
English-speaking cultural historians to talk about the public sphere stems from divergent
views about the causality of cultural and political phenomena. Too easily U.S. Latin
Americanists read public sphere as equivalent to Enlightenmentjust another name
for the same old liberal thematic. After all, Guerra wrote a history of elites that passed as41 Palti, "Recent studies."42 The exclusive focus on progressive scholars, without a reference to Guerra, in Steve Stern, "BetweenTragedy and Promise: The Politics of Writing Latin American History in the Late Twentieth Century," inReclaiming the political in Latin American history : essays from the North, ed. G. M. Joseph (Durham, NC:Duke University Press, 2001), 41. Guerras books are not mentioned in that volume and his influentialMxico: del antiguo rgimen a la revolucin still awaits for an English translator. It is not easy to document
the absence of a dialogue but the lack of works bringing together the authors mentioned in these pagesmight be evidence of it.43 Palti, "Recent studies; Luis Fernando Granados, "Calpultin decimonnicos: Aspectos nahuas de lacultura poltica de la ciudad de Mxico," in Actores, espacios y debates en la historia de la esfera pblicaen la ciudad de Mxico, ed. Pablo Piccato and Cristina Sacristn (Mexico City: Instituto Mora, 2005). For acritique of the teleology in the model of the public sphere see Francois-Xavier Guerra and AnnickLemprire, "Introduccin," in Los espacios pblicos en Iberoamrica: Ambigedades y problemas: SiglosXVIII-XIX, ed. Francois-Xavier Guerra and Annick Lemprire (Mxico: Fondo de Cultura Econmica,1999), 9. The criticism does not apply to Habermass view of modern rationalism and its teleologicalimplications. Habermas, Theory of Communicative Action.
20
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
21/60
el pueblo but remained elites, while Rojas and Aguilar emphasize republicanism over
democracy and other forms of representation. The risks are clear: skewing the traditional
centrality of political parties in national narratives, as Palti proposes, adds nuance but
may sacrifice an organizing guide to link institutions and socioeconomic interests.44
Try as they might to avoid it, however, these authors engagement with the public
sphere forces them to address social mediations beyond the world of ideas. The results
are mixed, since gender, class and other markers of difference are tangential to their
research agenda.45 Rojas, for example, uses marginality to explain the ambiguous class
character of insurgent pamphlet writers in Mexico. The poorly dressed authors whostraddled high ideological discourse and plebeian audiences belonged in traditional
sociabilities characterized by patronage, the old face-to-face communication of
pulqueras, and the everyday closeness to the vile populace; highly educated, these
pamphleteers nevertheless mocked the upper classes, thus defining their political role in
terms of resentment.46 Intellectual histories of the public sphere la Rojas are less likely
to look for social actors, political parties and representative practices (which in his view
were slow to be adopted in Mexican politics anyway), and more likely to stick to the
44 For analyses of the complexities of those links see Peter Guardino, "Barbarism or republican law?:Guerrero's peasants and national politics, 1820-1846," Hispanic American Historical Review 75, no. 2(1995); Ariel De la Fuente, Children of Facundo: Caudillo and Gaucho Insurgency During the Argentine
State-Formation Process (La Rioja, 1853-1870) (Durham N.C.: Duke University Press, 2000).45 For similar criticisms of the public sphere model from the perspective of intellectual history see David A.Bell, "The "Public Sphere," the State, and the World of Law in Eighteenth-Century France," FrenchHistorical Studies 17, no. 4 (1992): 615-916; Gordon, "Philosophy, Sociology, and Gender," 889. Aguilarfaults deterministic explicaciones que privilegian aspectos culturales. Aguilar, "El republicanismo," 83.46 Rojas, La escritura, 181, 70, 85. The marginality of those writers is debatable considering the enormousamount of publications they produced and the canonical stature of at least one of them, Jos JoaqunFernndez de Lizardi. For a useful examination of Lizardis central place in Mexican ideas aboutcitizenship and identity, see Robert McKee Irwin, Mexican Masculinities (Minneapolis: University ofMinnesota Press, 2003).
21
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
22/60
world of the literate public and its ability to open a public space for the writing of a new
imaginary.47
There is nothing intrinsic to the Habermasian model that would prevent it from
linking questions about publicity and language with questions about gender, class,
ethnicity, and about the power of markets and institutions to shape identities. The
articulation of private interests in public was, after all, part of the historical development
of the public sphere, as was the circulation of cultural products.48 We can find the
complexity of the public/private divide in McEvoys interest in politicians ethics and in
Paltis and other authors view of judicial public opinion as the judge of characters andreputations. Further studies of the notion of honor could contribute in this direction.49 The
interesting question about causality is not whether private interests were the basis of
political debates, but what were the specific historical conditions (mostly notions of
gender) that turned those interests into rational and national utterances.
The lack of a strong dialogue between political historiographies of Latin America
in Spanish and English might therefore be an effect of editorial decisions (translations
47 Rojas, La escritura, 45, 33. Who read and how the social context of audiences created diverse readings isa question asked by another growing group of scholars. See Chartier, Cultural Origins; Iain MacCalman,Radical Underworld: Prophets, Revolutionaries and Pornographers in London, 1795-1840 (London:Clarendon, 1992); Michael Warner, The letters of the Republic: Publication and the Public Sphere inEighteenth-Century America (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990); Melton, The Rise; PabloPiccato, "Jurados de imprenta en Mxico: El honor en la construccin de la esfera pblica," inConstrucciones impresas. Panfletos, diarios y revistas en la formacin de los estados nacionales en
Amrica Latina, 1820-1920, ed. Paula Alonso (Buenos Aires: FCE, 2004).48 Habermas, Structural Transformation, 18.49
Palti, "Recent studies; Palti, "Las polmicas." Looking at honor disputes, I would disagree with thethesis that reputation was no longer the concern of Mexican public in the late nineteenth century. PabloPiccato, "Jurados de imprenta en Mxico: El honor en la construccin de la esfera pblica," inConstrucciones impresas. Panfletos, diarios y revistas en la formacin de los estados nacionales en
Amrica Latina, 1820-1920, ed. Paula Alonso (Buenos Aires: FCE, 2004). See also for Peru Sarah C.Chambers, From Subjects to Citizens: Honor, Gender and Politics in Arequipa, Peru, 1780-1854(University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 1999), 92. In his critique of Mazas and Habermasswork, Bell notes the importance of subsidized press and courts of law as venues to express the same criticaldiscourse that a strict Habermasian model would locate only in salons and independent newspapers. Bell,"The "Public Sphere," the State, and the World," 919, 26, 28, 37.
22
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
23/60
matter) rather than a symptom of fundamental differences. Several areas of research
witness the development of common questions of relevance for cultural historians and
those interested in the public sphere. Two seem particularly dynamic: the colonial legacy
of the public sphere and the local, particularly urban dimension of its emergence.
Even if politicized and closely linked to revolution-era European vocabularies, the
public sphere that emerged in Spanish America around 1808 was structured by colonial
institutions and interests. I mentioned above the possibilities of religion as a theme to be
analyzed from this perspective. Colonial here refers to several forces that transcended
the severing of political ties: the notion of an original autonomy of American kingdomsand corporations, the reciprocal obligations between king and subjects that evolved into
popular sovereignty after abdication, and the intense urban political life that only came to
be registered in print late in the eighteenth century.50 These insights are outlined in Vctor
Uribes synthesis The Birth of the Public Sphere during the Age of Revolution. If the
Latin American public sphere was always politicized, that does not mean it appeared
around the time of independence. Instead, argues Uribe, echoing William Taylor, it came
to be during an age of revolution marked not only by 1789 but also by rebellions and
conspiracies in Saint Domingue, Brazil, the Alto Peru and Colombia. Unlike in Europe,
the stable historical development of markets and states was less important here than the
social and political ferment resulting in new sovereign realms and diversifying trade
links. Ayuntamientos,universities and other sites of learned debate, such as scientific
50 Besides Guerras works, see Annick Lemprire, Entre dieu et le roi, la rpublique: Mexico, XVIe-XIXesicle, Histoire ; 65 (Paris: Belles lettres, 2004); Ann Twinam, Public Lives, Private Secrets: Gender,Honor, Sexuality, and Illegitimacy in Colonial Spanish America (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford UniversityPress, 1999); Taylor, Magistrates; John L. Phelan, The people and the king. The Comunero Revolution inColombia (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978); Palti, "Recent studies; Antonio Annino, "ElJano bifronte: Los pueblos y los orgenes del liberalismo en Mxico," in Crisis, Reforma y Revolucin:Mxico: Historias de Fin de Siglo, ed. Leticia Reina and Elisa Servn (Mxico, D.F.: Taurus :CONACULTA-INAH, 2002), 209.
23
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
24/60
expeditions and economic societies, laid the foundation for a cultural class composed
mainly of lawyers and letrados who went on to have important roles in the insurgent and
loyalist bands in the 1810s.51 (Priests could also be added to the list, at least in Mexico.)
Beyond those elites, recent explorations of Andean rebellions during this age have
uncovered the strong ethnic component of revolutionary political engagement,
republicanism and communal democracies.52
Another decisive insight of histories of the public sphere in Latin America has
been the recognition of the need to bring back politics into an urban scale. This means
first that national and regional narratives can be studied in reference to capitalino elitesability (in their role of military and political leaders but also as public opinion) to
mobilize other actors and to incorporate their claims into the cultural revolution of
liberal republicanism. In Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Lima, public spheres were tied
to routes of commodities and information, and to administrative life. Ventilating national
conflicts in smaller cities was common from the early republic, as illustrated by the
51 Victor Uribe Uran, "The Birth of a Public Sphere in Latin America during the Age of Revolution,"Comparative Studies in Society and History 42, no. 2 (2000): 425-27, 37, 39. This is the first systematictreatment of the public sphere model in Latin America published in English. On the age of revolution seeUribe, Introduction, in Victor Uribe Uran, State and Society in Spanish America during the Age ofRevolution, Latin American silhouettes (Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, 2001). For a fundamentalstatement in this direction William B. Taylor, "Between Global Process and Local Knowledge: An Inquiryinto Early Latin American Social History, 1500-1900," in Reliving the Past: The Worlds of Social History,ed. Olivier Zunz (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1985). But see Eric Van Young,"Conclusions," in State and Society in Spanish America during the Age of Revolution, ed. Victor UribeUran (Wilmington, Del.: Scholarly Resources, 2001), 223, 36. A similar search for the seventeenth-century
roots of the English public sphere in Steve Pincus, ""Coffee Politicians Does Create": Coffeehouses andRestoration Political Culture," The Journal of Modern History 67, no. 4 (1995). On trade and politization,Paul Gootenberg, Imagining Development: Economic Ideas in Peru's "Fictitious Prosperity" of Guano,1840-1880 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1993).52 See Mark Thurner, "'Republicanos' and 'La Comunidad de Peruanos': Unimagined Political Communitiesin Postcolonial Andean Peru," Journal of Latin American Studies 27, no. 2 (1995); Sinclair Thomson, WeAlone Will Rule: Native Andean Politics in the Age of Insurgency, Living in Latin America (Madison:University of Wisconsin Press, 2002); Sergio Serulnikov, "Disputed Images of Colonialism: Spanish Ruleand Indian Subversion in Northern Potosi, 1777-1780," Hispanic American Historical Review 76, no. 2(1996).
24
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
25/60
widespread printing of political pamphlets and the participation of urban crowds in
disputes about national sovereignty.53
We have in ngel Ramas The Lettered City a paradigmatic account of Latin
American cities intellectual and spatial evolution. For Rama the letradoseducated
writers, often journalists or lawyers but also bureaucrats and academicsbenefited
during the colonial period from the separation between the baroque language of the state
and the verbal freedom of popular culture. The separation between these two realms
became problematic as education and the growth of cities (both in size and within
letrados mental landscape) forced them to understand the relation between language andclass. Rather than the sequence orality technologies of writing proposed by Palti and
implicit in other narratives of modernization, Rama argued that letrados writing
market came first from politicians demand for speeches and laws and from a dynamic
cultural marketplace around newspapers. With the modernization of late-nineteenth
century cities, mass politics, education and urban transformations expanded the lettered
city into a scale that broke with the social and intellectual structure of the original
colonial urban design, pushing intellectuals to combine the literary appropriation of
popular languages with the energy of propaganda.54Thus, and in spite of their own53 Warren, Vagrants, 3, 19, 17; Malcom Deas, "Practiques de sociabilit." See the seminal Tulio Halpern Donghi, Revolucin y guerra. Formacin deuna lite dirigente en la Argentina criolla (Mxico: Siglo Veintiuno, 1979).54 By the twentieth century, wrote Rama, the lettered city had itself been transformed . . . from a handful ofelite letrados designing government policies in their own image, into a socially more heterogeneous group
that retained a vision of itself as a cultural aristocracy but incorporated powerful democratizing cross-currents. Rama, The Lettered City, 112, 42-43, 88-89, 02-03, 04, 13. On transculturation, see Losprocesos de transculturacin en la narrativa latinoamericana (1974) in Angel Rama, La novela en AmricaLatina: Panoramas 1920-1980 (Montevideo: Fundacin Angel Rama Universidad Veracruzana, 1986). Thedictatorships of the 1970s, that forced Rama into exile, were an example of the manipulation of publicopinion made possible by mass media, but also, a source of new literary creativity, as in earlier phases ofthe Latin American lettered city. La censura como conciencia artstica (1979) in Angel Rama, Lariesgosa navegacin del escritor exiliado (Montevideo: Arca, 1993), 233-48. Although I have found noevidence of any exchange between Habermas and Rama (Habermass book was published in Spanish in1981, two years before Ramas death in exile) it is clear their syntheses shared a concern about the future of
25
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
26/60
prejudices, letrados supported educational reform and succeeded, through literary
nationalism, in creating an informed citizenry and a discourse on the definition,
formation, and collective values of the nation.55
Scholars, some of them explicitly engaged with Habermas, have enlarged the cast
of city characters, particularly during the twentieth century. According to Diane Davis,
for example, twentieth-century urban designers and administrators knew how the built
environment could create mass audiences. In Mexico City, commerce in downtown areas
was a key factor in the evolution of residential projects and in the politicization of
chilangos as urban consumers.
56
In downtown plazas (the semiotic center of Ramasciudad letrada) but also in restaurants, bars, chicheras, cantinas, pulperas and theaters,
cities hosted multiple forms of oral and manuscript communication that judged private
reputations and, therefore, citizens ability to be part of public opinion. Family and
democracy. There is no reference to Habermas in Ramas diary. He had taken up German lessons in 1974,to be able to read Walter Benjamin in his language, so we can imagine an eventual coincidence. AngelRama and Rosario Peyrou, Diario, 1974-1983 (Montevideo, Uruguay: Ediciones Trilce, 2001), 34.55 Rama, The Lettered City, 47, 66. See also Jos Luis Romero, Latinoamrica: las ciudades y las ideas(Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 1976); James R. Scobie, Buenos Aries, From Plaza to Suburb, 1870-1910 (NewYork: Oxford University Press, 1974). On thinking the nation, Claudio Lomnitz-Adler, Deep Mexico,Silent Mexico: An Anthropology of Nationalism, Public worlds ; v. 9 (Minneapolis: University ofMinnesota Press, 2001); Antonio Annino and Franois-Xavier Guerra, Inventando la nacin: Iberoamrica
siglo XIX, 1. ed. (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 2003). Writing was also necessarily a meansto exclude the plebe through aesthetic criteria. See Graciela Montaldo, Ficciones culturales y fbulas deidentidad en Amrica Latina (Rosario, Argentina: Beatriz Viterbo Editora, 1999), 29.56 Diane E. Davis, "El rumbo de la esfera pblica: Influencias locales, nacionales e internacionales en laurbanizacin del centro de la ciudad de Mxico, 1910-1950," in Actores, espacios y debates en la historiade la esfera pblica en la ciudad de Mxico, ed. Cristina Sacristn and Pablo Piccato (Mexico City:Instituto Mora, 2005). See in that same volume chapters by Georg Leidenberger and Luis FernandoGranados for other explorations of the urban dimension of the public sphere, and Ariel Rodrguez Kuri,"Desabasto, hambre y respuesta poltica, 1915," in Instituciones y ciudad. Ocho estudios histricos sobre laciudad de Mxico, ed. Carlos Illades and Ariel Rodrguez Kuri (Mexico City: FP-SONES-Unos, 2000).
26
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
27/60
clientelistic networks, friendship but also enmity operated in this urban scale.57 The
public sphere in these works is not only a physical space, but it is also one.58
Living in town was constitutive of private interests: the rights of a town dweller
were codified in ways that preceded and paralleled the rights of citizen of the nation. In
this regard the bourgeois component of the public sphere refers in Latin America less
to class identity than to the quality ofburgher.59Vecindad(literally, stable residence in a
pueblo or city) was central in the colonial articulation of political rights and in post-
independence societies where ethnic classifications no longer had legal strength.
Vecindaddid not refer only to residents but also integrated migrants by considering honoras a personal good earned through actions and the judgment of public opinion. Not
surprisingly, when sovereignty reverted to los pueblos with independence, local
institutions and physical spaces became key for citizenship: vecinos had to have an
57 See Alicia del Aguila Peralta, Callejones y mansiones: Espacios de opinin pblica y redes sociales ypolticias en la Lima del 900 (Lima: Pontificia Universidad Catlica del Per, 1997); Palti, "Recentstudies; Guerra and Lemprire, Los espacios pblicos; Lomnitz-Adler, Deep Mexico, Silent Mexico, 148.For an interest in orality see recent works out of the Universidad Iberoamericana department of history andthe journal Historia y Grafa. These patterns were also present in rural society. See John Charles Chasteen,"Violence for Show: Knife Duelling on a Nineteenth-Century Cattle Frontier," in The Problem of Order inChanging Societies: Essays on Crime and Policing in Argentina and Uruguay, 1750-1940, ed. Lyman L.Johnson (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1990), and other works in that volume; PabloPiccato, ""El populacho" y la opinin pblica: Debates y motines sobre la deuda inglesa en 1884," in Podery legitimidad en Mxico, Siglo XIX: Instituciones y cultura poltica, ed. Brian Connaughton (Mexico City:Universidad Autnoma Metropolitana-Miguel Angel Porra, 2003).58 Mah warns about spacialization of the public sphere. Mah, "Phantasies ." This critique applies toGuerra and Lemprire, Los espacios pblicos, but most recent studies do not seem to be too concernedabout a dichotomy between spatial and conceptual spheres.59
Guerra and Lemprire, "Introduccin," 7. For a critique of the French bourgeoisie as exclusive model,see Geoff Eley, "The British Model and the German Road: Rethinking the Course of German HistoryBefore 1914," in The Peculiarities of German History: Bourgeois Society and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Germany, ed. David Blackbourn and Geoff Eley (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), 52, 75-76, 79; David Blackbourn, "The German Bourgeoisie: An Introduction," in The German Bourgeoisie.Essays on the social history of the German middle class from the late eighteenth to the early twentieth
century, ed. David Blackbourn and ed Richard J. Evans (London and New York: 1992), 2. See furtherdiscussion in Piccato, "Introduccin." For the ambiguity between bourgeois and civil in German seeJean L. Cohen and Andrew Arato, Civil society and political theory, Studies in contemporary Germansocial thought (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1992), viii.
27
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
28/60
honest way of livinga requirement in Mexican constitutions that allowed local
notables to adjudicate the right to vote.60
Citizenship remained problematic after written constitutions, and in the last
fifteen years it has been one of the central themes of Latin American historiography.
Encouraged by new evidence about vecindadand by the transition to democracy, authors
have explored the contradictions of post-colonial regimes where political rights were
supposed to be universal, yet access to political influence continued to be restricted.61 As
their knowledge of nineteenth-century political practices and discourses sharpened,
researchers have tackled mechanisms of political representation and exclusion, includingand beyond elections, to explain the success or failure of regimes. Patronage had been the
traditional argument to prove that democracy in Latin America was not so democratic
and that little could be gained by reading constitutions. But, as research began to erode
the images of dual, hierarchical societies, studies of electoral practices established the
complex, locally determined interactions between traditional means of political action
and the modern practices of the ballot box.62 Elections, however, could take research
60 Tamar Herzog, Defining Nations: Immigrants and Citizens in Early Modern Spain and Spanish America(New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), 2, 6; Annino, "El Jano bifronte; Antonio Annino, "Cdiz y larevolucin territorial de los pueblos mexicanos 1812-1821," in Historia de las elecciones en Iberoamrica,siglo XIX: De la formacin del espacio poltico nacional, ed. Antonio Annino (Buenos Aires: FCE, 1995);Rojas, La escritura, 46. For examples of the continuity and importance of local sovereignties andcommunities in Mexico, see Andrs Lira, Comunidades indgenas frente a la ciudad de Mxico:Tenochtitlan y Tlatelolco, sus pueblos y barrios, 1812-1919 (Mexico City: El Colegio de Mxico, 1995);Granados, "Calpultin decimonnicos."61 See for example Peter F. Guardino, Peasants, Politics, and the Formation of Mexico's National State:Guerrero, 1800-1857(Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1996); Charles Walker, Smoldering
ashes : Cuzco and the creation of Republican Peru, 1780-1840, Latin America otherwise (Durham, NC:Duke University Press, 1999); Hilda Sbato, Ciudadana poltica y formacin de las naciones:Perspectivas histricas de Amrica Latina (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 1999); Escalante,Ciudadanos imaginarios. For a contemporary perspective on the public sphere as a qualitative index ofdemocracy, Phillip Oxhorn, "When Democracy isn't all that Democratic: Social Exclusion and the Limits ofthe Public Sphere in Latin America," in The North-South Agenda (Miami: North-South Center, Universityof Miami, 2001).62 See Antonio Annino, ed., Historia de las elecciones en Iberoamrica, siglo XIX: De la formacin delespacio poltico nacional(Buenos Aires: FCE, 1995); Hilda Sbato, Alberto Rodolfo Lettieri, andPrograma de Estudios de Historia Econmica y Social Americana., eds., La vida poltica en la Argentina
28
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
29/60
only so far, as evidence suggested that most of the action was happening around, before
and after the actual vote.
It is not surprising, then, that the same historians who worked on elections have
turned their attention toward civil society as a more comprehensive focus of enquiry. In
her introduction to a volume suggestively entitled La vida poltica en la Argentina del
siglo XIX: Armas, votos y voces, Hilda Sabato refers to this thematic explosion brought
about by Guerra and other political historians, in order to challenge nation and state as the
natural points of departure for the study of politics, hence taking a closer look at the
relations between civil society and the political system.
63
In The Many and the Few, thekey of those relations, and the most important factor to explain electoral outcomes, are
civil associations.64Based on a detailed contextualization of street-level practices in
nineteenth-century Buenos Aires, Sabato sees the public sphere as a direct representation
of specific social actors. Yet relation is not unidirectional: mechanisms of representation
and the political identity of collective actors may change as a result of discussions in the
public sphere, and it can fragment into multiple public spheres, although political society
(elections and the state) ultimately remains the driving force behind the emergence of
civil society. Thus, although Sabato was one of the first scholars to incorporate the public
del siglo XIX : armas, votos y voces, 1a ed., Seccin de obras de historia (Mxico ; Estados Unidos deAmrica ; Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 2003). A review of the literature that points to awider, multilayered view of political citizenship in Hilda Sabato, "On Political Citizenship in Nineteenth-Century Latin America," American Historical Review 106, no. 4 (2001). For a critique from a LatinAmerican perspective of Habermass lack of interest on representative practices, Guerra and Lemprire,
"Introduccin," 9-10. See on patronage see, f. ex., Richard Graham, Patronage and politics in NineteenthCentury Brazil(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990); Adrian A. Bantjes, As if Jesus Walked onEarth: Cardenismo, Sonora, and the Mexican Revolution (Wilmington, Del.: SR Books, 1998).63 Hilda Sabato, "Introduccin: La vida poltica argentina: miradas histricas sobre el siglo XIX," in Lavida poltica en la Argentina del siglo XIX: Armas, votos y voces, ed. Hilda Sabato and Alberto RodolfoLettieri (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Econmica, 2003), 10, 11.64 Hilda Sbato, The Many and the Few: Political Participation in Republican Buenos Aires (Stanford,Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2001). First published in Spanish as Hilda Sbato, La poltica en lascalles : entre el voto y la movilizacin : Buenos Aires, 1862-1880 (Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana,1998). For the historiographical context of this work see Palti, "Recent studies."
29
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
30/60
sphere into historical research in Latin America, she now cautiously characterizes the
category as controversial, too closely connected to the European bourgeoisie and, in
Latin America, to the state-building period of the second half of the nineteenth century.65
Are civil society and the state the inevitable reference and ultimate rationale of
the public sphere? Habermas and other authors have emphasized communicative
practice, the dialogical building of meanings and voices, as a way to bridge the
conceptual gap between civil society, the market, and politics. Examining the public
sphere becomes in that perspective a central operation in the history of civil society
particularly as we try to understand the transition from totalitarianism to democracy, andto the mass media-dominated politics of contemporary Western societies.66 Sabatos use
of civil society as the realm of voluntary associations autonomous from the state gives
priority to preexisting socioeconomic identities. But identities are changed by debate
itself, by the contents and rules of actors intervention in the public sphere. Post-
independence civic associations defined themselves in multiple ways: ethnically,
ideologically, spatially, by trade. Class identity was not merely a condition for associative
life, but the point of intersection of labor relations, individual and intimate interests,
and the state as regulator of workthus simultaneously referring to domestic, local,
65 Sbato, The Many and the Few, 9 and ff. Ideas about the public sphere and its fragmentation are alsopresented in Sabato, "On Political Citizenship." She acknowledges that the notion, along with civil societyand sociability, have rendered visible a new set of questions and problems. Sabato, "On Political
Citizenship; Sbato, The Many and the Few, 10. For an earlier formulation Hilda Sbato, "Citizenship,Political Participation and the Formation of the Public Sphere in Buenos Aires 1850s-1880s," Past andPresent, no. 136 (1992). A divided public sphere, a common Latin American variation from the Habermasmodel, as we will see below, postulated in Oskar Negt and Alexander Kluge, Public Sphere andExperience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere, Theory and history ofliterature ; v. 85 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993).66 Habermas, "Further Reflections," 452-55; Cohen and Arato, Civil society and political theory. Habermasuses the term lifeworld, rather than culture, to refer to the horizon of meaning that makes possiblecommunicative action. See Habermas, Theory of Communicative Action, 43, 70; Habermas, ThePhilosophical Discourse, 37-43.
30
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
31/60
regional and national levels of identification.67A public sphere-centered examination of
civil society, in other words, avoids simplistic notions about the autonomy of the political
or the subordination of culture to social relations, framing a historical interpretation of
economic interests as they turn into political mobilization and debates.68
One example of the potential rewards of this agenda is Carlos Forments history
of Latin American democracy. Based on an extensive database of civic associations and
printed media in Mexico and Peru, Forment lays out the public sphere, along with
political, economic and civil societies, as one of the public terrains on which Latin
American democracy flourished during the nineteenth century. In his view, the publicsphere makes possible communication between the other realms of democracy; if, for
example, civil society is to have an impact on economic processes and decision-making it
can only be through the public sphere.69 Dividing the terrain of the public sphere into
Literate, Oral and Visual subfields,70 Forment builds a counter-intuitive history of
democracy that fuses a Tocquevillian large narrative with a close look at socio-moral
practices. The key thematic connection between these two dimensions, according to
Forment, is that between passion, Catholicism, and civil society. The hypothesis could be
stronger if supported by a close reading, that other historians will surely attempt, of the
67 See a proposal to look at class in similar terms in Claudio Lomnitz, Exits from the Labyrinth: Cultureand Ideology in the Mexican National Space (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992). Seefollowing section on the coincidences between this program and a Gramscian study of ideology andsubject positions.68 For a reflection on culture, ethnic identity, economic grievances, morality as sites for political
discussion see Van Young, The Other Rebellion, 16-17, 90. Questions about economic and politicalbehavior emerged as one of the centers of the debate about new cultural history of Mexico in History NewCultural, Hispanic American Historical Review 79:2 (May 1999), edited by Susan Deans-Smith and GilbertM. Joseph. See a useful analysis of the debates about civil society in Margaret R. Somers, "Narrating andNaturalizing Civil Society and Citizenship Theory: The Place of Political Culture and the Public Sphere,"Sociological Theory 13, no. 3 (1995).69 Forment, Democracy in Latin America, 18, 18n. This is similar to Sabatos view of the role of the publicsphere between state and civil society, and departs only in terms of emphasis from a public-sphere centeredtheory of civil society as in Cohen and Arato, Civil society and political theory.70 Forment, Democracy in Latin America, 22.
31
8/7/2019 Public sphere in Latin America Espacio publico en Iberoamerica Universidad de Columbia
32/60
self-referential, narrowly political debates that occupied much of the nineteenth century
public sphere in those countries. Forment, after all, seeks to upset intellectual and
political historians election- and elite- centered narratives, to the point of declaring
municipal politics and elections of small importance. Such dismissal of the established
narratives of politics (found also in Paltis La invenci