36 | NewScientist | 1 September 2018
LAST November, a remarkable new species was added to life’s catalogue. The Tapanuli orangutan lives in a small
patch of rainforest on the Indonesian island of Sumatra, a biodiversity hotspot known as the Batang Toru ecosystem. It is just the eighth living species of great ape to be described, besides two previously known orangutans, two gorillas, chimps, bonobos – and us.
But triumph is tinged with tragedy. The entire population of Tapanuli orangutans is thought to be fewer than 800. It instantly became the world’s most endangered great ape. Soon it won’t be endangered any more. It will be extinct.
Right now, bulldozers and chainsaws are tearing into its habitat. By 2022, if things go to plan, the Batang Toru hydroelectric dam will have destroyed 3.6 square kilometres of prime habitat in the middle of the orang’s home. A 13.5-kilometre tunnel will be dug to carry water from the dam. Access roads will be built, power lines laid and part of the valley flooded. “The associated infrastructure will destroy key habitat with the highest density of orangutans,” says Gabriella Fredriksson, founder of the Pro Natura Foundation, a local conservation charity. The dam will send the orangs “spinning towards extinction”, says her colleague Matt Nowak.
The orangutan’s demise is not unstoppable, but the forces that threaten it probably are. The dam is one small piece of a global infrastructure boom that promises to reshape our world over the next decade. This will bring much-needed roads, energy and jobs to some of the world’s poorest people. But it will come at a shocking expense to nature.
The question is: can we do things better?When conservation biologists hear the
word “infrastructure”, they shudder. “It’s the primary force that is peeling back nature and opening the last remaining wild areas like a flayed fish,” says Bill Laurance of James Cook University in Australia. “If you look at everything that is going on environmentally – dwindling wildlife populations, habitat fragmentation, shrinking wilderness areas, protected areas being isolated, poaching and encroaching of biodiversity hotspots – you find that infrastructure is the proximate cause, the first step, in those processes.”
Gouged stripsAnd its effects are profound. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, which maintains the Red List of Threatened Species, of 13,761 endangered or critically endangered species, 4383 are directly threatened by infrastructure projects of one kind or another. These include residential and commercial development, extractive industries, energy projects and road building.
A further 7500 or so species are at risk from farming, logging, hunting, gathering, trapping and fishing. These are not infrastructure projects per se, but they are enabled by them – especially road building. Cutting a road through a wilderness is like gouging a strip of paint off the surface of a piece of wood: rot gets in and diffuses outwards.
“Roads are the most damaging sort of infrastructure,” says Laurance. “They are the common denominator: you can’t put in a new
Road killThe world is experiencing an unprecedented highway building boom – with untold consequences for the planet’s wildlife, says Graham Lawton
BIODIVERSITY IN CRISIS
Scar on the landscape: This new road cuts through verdant valleys to service a Chinese-funded railway project in Laos
Continued on page 40 >
180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 36 24/08/2018 17:52
40 | NewScientist | 1 September 2018
mine or a hydro project or fossil fuels without roads.” They also open frontiers for logging, land clearance, poaching, hunting and illicit drug production. In the Brazilian Amazon, 95 per cent of forest destruction occurs within 5.5 kilometres of a road. Similar levels have been seen in Cambodia, Sumatra, Thailand and Panama. Around 70 per cent of the world’s forests are now less than 1 kilometre from a forest edge.
That creates lots of “edge habitat”, which has different light levels and exposure to the elements from the forest interior, and often ends up with different plant and animal species. Roads also affect biodiversity directly. They restrict the movement of animals, fragment their habitats, expose them to new diseases and chemical and noise pollution, and convert them into road kill. To add insult to injury, they also facilitate the spread of invasive species and clamp the world ever tighter into the vice of fossil fuels.
A recent paper on the risk of road building, co-authored by Laurance, reported that “we are currently witnessing the most dramatic era of road expansion in human history”. The researchers calculated that since 2000, the world’s legal road network has lengthened by 12 million kilometres, enough to encircle the globe 300 times – not including wildcat road building for illegal logging, farming and hunting. Most new roads are in the tropics, where the bulk of the world’s wildlife resides.
For these reasons, conservation biologists
regard infrastructure development as the principal agent of biodiversity decline. An analysis of 35 years of research on habitat fragmentation caused by such development concluded that it reduces biodiversity by anything from 13 to 75 per cent.
But still we build. The Batang Toru dam is part of probably the largest infrastructure programme the world has ever seen: the Chinese-led Belt and Road Initiative, which since it began in 2013 has grown to encompass around 7000 individual projects across 70 countries (see “Belts and roads”, page 38).
That is not the only gigantic infrastructure project in the pipeline, just the biggest of a bad bunch. More than 30 development corridors are planned or being built across Africa, requiring 53,000 kilometres of new road,
much of it in protected areas. South America has its Initiative for the Integration of Regional Infrastructure, which will build roads, pipelines and dams across the Amazon and beyond. Reforms to the US Endangered Species Act will make it easier to build roads in wilderness areas there.
Over the next 30 years, it is estimated that a further 25 million kilometres of road will be built across the world, mostly in the tropics. If these highways all go ahead, the prospects for biodiversity are poor. The tropics will end up looking a bit like Western Europe, with heavily fragmented ecosystems stripped of wildlife.
The story of the Tapanuli orangutan is a case study of development flying in the face of conservation. An environmental impact assessment carried out on the Batang Toru dam project in 2014, before the orangutan was recognised as a unique species, flagged up some major hazards, including habitat destruction. The following year, a biodiversity survey led by Fredriksson for the dam’s lead construction company, North Sumatra Hydro Energy, recorded numerous critically endangered and legally protected species on the site, including Sumatran tigers, Malayan pangolins and the orangutans. It warned that the area earmarked for the dam was “an integral part of the Batang Toru Ecosystem” and that “the construction of any infrastructure in this fragile ecosystem will have significant impacts on the highly biodiverse and unique Batang Toru forests”.
The orangs in particular will be hit hard. The area that will be cleared and flooded contains the highest density of the apes, with 41 individuals, 5 per cent of the entire global population. But worse, the dam and associated infrastructure will destroy already fragile corridors between the orang’s strongholds, creating three isolated populations that have no hope of interbreeding (see map, left). Two of these are too small to be considered viable. The largest one contains 531 orangs, which is just about viable.
Sound of chainsaws“It’s crazy,” says Laurance. “It’s the world’s most critically endangered great ape, for God’s sake.” Further losses caused by encroachment on the forest will probably condemn the species to the grave. Fredriksson’s biodiversity survey found that the site is already being assaulted by illegal land clearance, catalysed by the prospect of development and facilitated by temporary river crossings installed to get equipment to the site. The survey was
COPY SUBPAGE SUBOK for press
10km
G_Biodiversity_ Batang
5 to 8 years old
Dammed to extinctionThe entire population of Tapanuli orangutans lives in three patches of forest in northern Sumatra. A planned hydroelectric dam will cut o� connections between them and probably doom the species
SOURCE: PRO NATURA FOUNDATION
Pandan
Sibolga
CENTRAL TAPANULI
West block531 individuals
Habitats of Tapanuli orangutans
East block161 individuals
Sibualbuali27 individuals
Area threatened by hydroelectric dam
41 individuals
Wildlife corridors
SOUTH TAPANULI
NORTH TAPANULI SUMATRA
12 million km
...25 million km
The estimated length of road built worldwide since 2000
The projected extra length of road to be built worldwide by 2050
SOURCE: CURRENT BIOLOGY, VOL 27, PAGE PR1130
Continued from page 36
180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 40 24/08/2018 14:00
1 September 2018 | NewScientist | 41
carried out to the sound of chainsaws.According to a coalition of local NGOs, the
project is not even necessary. North Sumatra does not have an energy shortage and even if it did, there are other sites that could be developed without destroying a globally important habitat.
And yet the project ploughs on. “[The hydro company] has gone full steam ahead, especially after the orangutan was declared a separate species,” says Fredriksson. In May, the company announced that the dam would open in 2022. A spokesperson told the Jakarta Globe: “We understand that the forest ecosystem plays an important role… We are not going to sacrifice it. This has been our commitment from the very beginning.”
Ultimately, according to an investigation by the NGOs, the project is controlled by Chinese companies and money. New Scientist asked Sinohydro, the Chinese state hydropower company that is a major stakeholder in the project, for comment. It did not respond, but its website says that one of its priorities is “preserving biodiversity”.
It is possible to build infrastructure without destroying vital habitats and the biodiversity that depends on them. Conservation biologists and even pressure groups like WWF accept that development can coexist with environmental protection, bringing enormous benefits to people without trashing nature. “We’re not anti-development, we’re anti-stupid development,” says Laurance.
In Russia’s wild east, for example, a precious habitat for endangered Siberian tigers and
even more endangered Amur leopards was recently saved from being sliced in two by a four-lane highway, part of the Belt and Road Initiative linking Russia to China and North Korea.
“During improvement and widening of this road, we have two or three places where leopards were killed in car accidents,” says Evgeny Shvarts of WWF Russia. Losing that many leopards was a huge blow. At one point, the entire population was down to 29.
He and other conservationists persuaded the Far Eastern Leopards Federal Conservation Program, which is overseen by Sergei Ivanov, Vladimir Putin’s special representative for the environment, to create a wildlife corridor by funding a 530-metre tunnel for the road. “It was a really important case,” says Shvarts. “We really believe it is possible to save habitat if we convince very high-level persons to make the right decisions.” The Narvinskiy Pass tunnel opened in 2016. Tigers and leopards are using the overpass and populations of both are increasing, says Shvarts.
There are other examples. In Nigeria, the government of Cross River state recently agreed to reroute a planned major highway to avoid slicing through a national park that hosts a population of gorillas. In Bangladesh, the state-owned rail company is building overpasses to allow wild elephants to cross a high-speed line now under construction.
And planned infrastructure projects sometimes don’t happen at all. In June, the new Malaysian government abruptly and unexpectedly cancelled four major Belt and Road projects. At the same time, millions of square kilometres of farmland, mostly in developed countries, are being abandoned. This is creating what conservation biologists see as a potential bonanza of ecological restoration, known as “rewilding”, which could be the saviour of biodiversity. But that is another story. ■
Graham Lawton is a staff feature writer for New Scientist
Hydroelectric projects threaten Indonesia’s Batang Toru ecosystem, sole home of the Tapanuli orangutan (below)
This is the second in Graham Lawton’s series of articles about biodiversity. The third will be on rewilding. Send your suggestions for topics to cover to [email protected]
AN
DR
EW W
ALM
SLEY
/ SO
S / A
LAM
Y ST
OCK
PH
OTO
AN
DR
EW W
ALM
SLEY
/ SO
S / A
LAM
Y ST
OCK
PH
OTO
PORT
RA
IT: K
IRST
IN K
IDD
180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 41 24/08/2018 17:52
38 | NewScientist | 1 September 2018
Infr
astr
uctu
re d
evel
opm
ent,
es
peci
ally
of r
oads
, has
alr
eady
di
stur
bed
pris
tine
eco
syst
ems a
cros
s th
e gl
obe
(see
map
, abo
ve).
Wha
t Ch
ina’
s Bel
t and
Roa
d In
itia
tive
(BR
I)
cons
ists
of i
s unc
lear
: the
pro
ject
has
no
off
icia
l map
and
com
mun
icat
ions
ab
out i
t lac
k de
tail.
The
“bel
t”
orig
inal
ly re
ferr
ed to
new
ove
rlan
d lin
ks tr
aver
sing
the
hist
oric
Silk
Roa
d ac
ross
cent
ral A
sia.
The
“roa
d”,
conf
usin
gly,
is a
ship
ping
rout
e fr
om
port
s in
sout
hern
Chi
na to
Wes
tern
Eu
rope
via
Sou
th-E
ast A
sia,
the
Indi
an O
cean
and
the
Suez
Can
al.
The
orig
inal
Silk
Roa
d w
as a
ne
twor
k of
ove
rlan
d tr
ade
rout
es
pass
ing
thro
ugh
anci
ent,
rom
anti
c-so
undi
ng ci
ties
such
as S
amar
kand
, B
ukha
ra a
nd C
onst
anti
nopl
e. It
outl
aste
d th
e G
reek
, Rom
an,
Byz
anti
ne, U
may
yad
and
Mon
gol
empi
res,
but
fell
into
dec
line
in th
e 18
th ce
ntur
y. T
he v
isio
n be
hind
its
rebo
ot, l
aunc
hed
in 2
013
, is t
o hy
per-
acce
lera
te tr
ade
and
deve
lopm
ent
acro
ss E
uras
ia a
nd b
eyon
d.
Wes
tern
crit
ics
ofte
n se
e B
RI a
s pa
rt o
f an
atte
mpt
by
Chin
a to
bui
ld
a ne
w, S
inoc
entr
ic w
orld
ord
er. I
ts
ambi
tion
is ce
rtai
nly
unpr
eced
ente
d:
som
e 70
00
pro
ject
s in
70 co
untr
ies
wit
h a
proj
ecte
d co
st o
f $8
trill
ion
by
2050
. The
bel
t has
now
exp
ande
d to
si
x de
velo
pmen
t cor
rido
rs ra
diat
ing
out f
rom
Chi
na. S
outh
Am
eric
a an
d A
fric
a ha
ve th
eir o
wn
prog
ram
mes
(s
ee m
ap, b
elow
).Th
e po
tent
ial c
ost t
o na
ture
of
BR
I is i
ncal
cula
ble.
As a
gro
up o
f
cons
erva
tion
bio
logi
sts w
rote
in
Nat
ure
Ecol
ogy
and
Evol
utio
n ea
rlie
r th
is y
ear,
“BR
I cou
ld h
ave
disa
stro
us
cons
eque
nces
for b
iodi
vers
ity”
.La
st y
ear,
cons
erva
tion
gro
up W
WF
publ
ishe
d th
e re
sult
s of a
n in
itia
l an
alys
is o
f the
pos
sibl
e im
pact
of t
he
init
iati
ve’s
land
-bas
ed d
evel
opm
ent
corr
idor
s and
war
ned
of a
lita
ny o
f th
reat
s. T
he co
rrid
ors c
ollid
e w
ith
num
erou
s pro
tect
ed a
reas
, w
ilder
ness
es a
nd b
iodi
vers
ity
hots
pots
. The
y sl
ice
thro
ugh
the
rang
es o
f 265
thre
aten
ed sp
ecie
s,
incl
udin
g 8
1 en
dang
ered
and
39
cr
itic
ally
end
ange
red
ones
. Am
ong
thes
e ar
e ti
gers
, sno
w le
opar
ds, s
aiga
an
telo
pes,
Am
ur le
opar
ds a
nd g
iant
pa
ndas
. As y
et, n
obod
y ha
s ass
esse
d th
e im
pact
of t
he m
arit
ime
silk
road
.
Chin
a ha
s re
peat
edly
ple
dged
to
mak
e th
e B
elt a
nd R
oad
a gr
een
and
sust
aina
ble
proj
ect.
Xi m
akes
fr
eque
nt re
fere
nce
to h
is v
isio
n of
tu
rnin
g Ch
ina
into
an
“eco
logi
cal
civi
lisat
ion”
, wit
h su
stai
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t a p
rior
ity.
He
has
exte
nded
this
sen
tim
ent t
o th
e B
elt a
nd R
oad,
in 2
016
calli
ng o
n pa
rtic
ipan
ts to
“dee
pen
coop
erat
ion
in
env
iron
men
tal p
rote
ctio
n,
inte
nsif
y ec
olog
ical
pre
serv
atio
n an
d bu
ild a
gre
en S
ilk R
oad”
.Co
nser
vati
on b
iolo
gist
Bill
La
uran
ce o
f Jam
es C
ook
Uni
vers
ity,
A
ustr
alia
, acc
epts
that
Chi
na is
m
akin
g ge
nuin
e ef
fort
s dom
esti
cally
. B
ut it
s war
m w
ords
abo
ut th
e B
elt
and
Roa
d In
itia
tive
are
“a g
igan
tic
bunc
h of
gre
enw
ash”
, he
says
.
Evge
ny S
hvar
ts, d
irec
tor o
f co
nser
vati
on p
olic
y at
WW
F R
ussi
a an
d co
-aut
hor o
f a re
cent
rese
arch
pa
per o
n th
e ri
sks
of B
RI t
o R
ussi
a’s
envi
ronm
ent,
war
ns th
at th
e in
itia
tive
is in
par
t a s
leig
ht o
f ha
nd to
exp
ort e
nvir
onm
enta
lly
dam
agin
g ac
tivi
ties
from
Chi
na to
ot
her c
ount
ries
. Th
e vi
ew fr
om in
side
Chi
na is
mor
e nu
ance
d. A
cons
erva
tion
bio
logi
st w
ho
wor
ks fo
r the
Chi
nese
gov
ernm
ent,
an
d w
ho a
sked
not
to b
e na
med
, say
s Ch
ines
e bi
olog
ists
are
ver
y aw
are
of
the
proj
ect’s
env
iron
men
tal r
isks
and
ar
e be
ing
give
n la
rge
amou
nts
of
fund
ing
to in
vest
igat
e an
d m
itig
ate
them
. But
they
are
als
o ex
pect
ed to
to
e th
e pa
rty
line
that
the
init
iati
ve
is C
hina
’s “g
ift t
o th
e w
orld
”.
COPY
SUB
PAGE
SUB
OK fo
r pre
ssG
_Bio
div
ersi
ty r
oad
s
No
road
sRo
ad d
ensi
ty (m
/km
2 )
Road
den
sity
is a
mea
sure
of h
ow in
tact
eco
syst
ems
are,
and
var
ies
huge
ly a
cros
s th
e gl
obe
<10
10-1
0010
0-25
025
0-10
00>
1000
SOU
RCE:
doi
.org
/cs6
m
Larg
e in
fras
truc
ture
pr
ogra
mm
es th
reat
en
biod
iver
sity
acr
oss
the
glob
e –
wit
h C
hina
’s B
elt a
nd R
oad
Initi
ativ
e a
new
thre
at
PAVE
D
PLA
NET
180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 38 24/08/2018 14:00
1 September 2018 | NewScientist | 39
COPY
SUB
PAGE
SUB
OK fo
r pre
ssG
_Bio
div
ersi
ty
SOU
RCE:
IIRS
A PR
IORI
TY P
ROJE
CTS
SOU
RCE:
doi
.org
/gcp
nrh
SOU
RCE:
doi
.org
/9kg
SOU
RCE:
MER
CATO
R IN
STIT
UTE
FO
R CH
INA
STU
DIE
S
0-50
0m
Area
s of
und
istu
rbed
fore
st,
mea
sure
d by
dis
tanc
e fr
om
its e
dge
500-
1000
>10
00
Port
Rail
Act
ive
corr
idor
Plan
ned
Upg
rade
und
er w
ay
Gas
pipe
line
Oil
pipe
line
Sea
rout
e (r
oad)
Land
rout
es (b
elt)
Port
Sout
h Am
eric
aAf
rica
Belt
and
Road
Airp
ort
Tunn
el
Road
Pow
er li
ne
Gas
pipe
line
Rive
r nav
igat
ion
Infr
astr
uctu
re p
roje
cts
arou
nd th
e w
orld
, inc
ludi
ng C
hina
’s Be
lt a
nd R
oad
Init
iati
ve,
thre
aten
rem
aini
ng p
risti
ne fo
rest
eco
syst
ems
The
Mar
itim
e Si
lk R
oad,
par
t of t
he B
elt
and
Road
Init
iati
ve, s
tret
ches
into
the
hear
t of E
urop
e. T
he It
alia
n po
rts
of
Rav
enna
, Ven
ice
and
Trie
ste,
alo
ng w
ith
Kope
r in
Slov
enia
and
Rije
ka in
Cro
atia
, ha
ve fo
rmed
the
Nor
th A
dria
tic
Port
A
ssoc
iati
on to
take
adv
anta
ge. T
he
asso
ciat
ion
has
begu
n w
ork
on a
gia
nt
plat
form
off
Ven
ice
to lo
ad a
nd u
nloa
d hu
ge c
argo
shi
ps fr
om th
e Su
ez C
anal
Russ
ia’s
far e
ast c
onta
ins
vast
tr
acts
of u
ndis
turb
ed fo
rest
and
w
etla
nd h
ome
to S
iber
ian
tige
rs
and
Am
ur le
opar
ds –
a bi
odiv
ersi
ty
succ
ess
stor
y th
reat
ened
by
the
Bel
t and
Roa
d In
itia
tive
Sout
h A
mer
ica
was
re
cent
ly in
vite
d to
join
the
Bel
t and
Roa
d In
itia
tive
, bu
t alre
ady
has
its
own
equi
vale
nt. T
he In
itia
tive
fo
r the
Inte
grat
ion
of
Regi
onal
Infr
astr
uctu
re is
a
$38
bill
ion
plan
to fo
rge
clos
er ti
es b
etw
een
the
cont
inen
t’s e
cono
mie
s.
Impr
ovem
ents
to th
e ro
ad
from
Car
acas
in V
enez
uela
to
Man
aus
in th
e A
maz
on
basi
n in
Bra
zil i
s a
maj
or
cons
erva
tion
wor
ry
Expa
nsio
n of
coal
in
dust
ry in
fras
truc
ture
on
Aus
tral
ia’s
east
co
ast,
par
tly
in
resp
onse
to C
hine
se
dem
and,
thre
aten
s ec
osys
tem
s bo
th
inla
nd a
nd o
ffsh
ore
on
the
Grea
t Bar
rier
Ree
f
The
new
Mal
aysi
an
gove
rnm
ent c
ance
lled
a pl
anne
d hi
gh-s
peed
ra
il lin
k fr
om K
uala
Lu
mpu
r to
Sing
apor
e ea
rlier
this
yea
r – th
e fi
rst m
ajor
set
back
fo
r thi
s st
rate
gica
lly
cruc
ial a
rm o
f the
Bel
t an
d Ro
ad In
itia
tive
The
Bel
t and
Roa
d In
itia
tive
will
mak
e in
road
s in
to A
fric
a,
but t
he co
ntin
ent a
lso
has
at le
ast 3
3 ot
her
deve
lopm
ent c
orrid
ors
plan
ned,
whi
ch w
ould
ad
d 53
,000
kilo
met
res o
f ro
ad a
nd fr
agm
ent v
ital
w
ilder
ness
are
as s
uch
as
the
Cong
o ba
sin
180901_F_BioInfrastructure.indd 39 24/08/2018 14:13