8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
1/12
Meeting Americas
Solvency Challenge
Robert L. Reynolds
President and
Chie Executive Ofcer
Putnam Investments
Edited from a speech
given to the Investment
Advisor Association,
Boston, Massachusetts,on April 28, 2011
My topic today is Americas solvency challenge a very timely topic that we see
reected these days in the news media all the time. By defnition, this talk has to touch
on some very serious problems beore it sketches out some positive solutions centered
on reorm o Americas retirement systems. Even there, I need to warn you o a new
threat to retirement savings incentives that we will all ace.
So beore I talk about some o these hazards, let me assure you that I have always been
an optimist about America, and I still am. This is an incredibly creative, dynamic, and
resilient country. I believe we will rise to meet the challenge Im here to talk about. And I
am actually bullish about the next year or so. Our economy is growing. We will prob-
ably see record corporate earnings this year, which is what ultimately drives stock
prices. And yet, I think all o us know that our country is at a critical inection point. We
really do ace a choice between decline and renewal.
Our choice: Decline or renewal
I believe we all know in our bones that Americas uture economy has to be very
dierent rom our recent past. We cant go back to 2007, with an ocial savings rate
near zero, houses turned into ATM machines, and leverage rising everywhere. We
shouldnt want to replay that movie. We know how it ended.
We have to fnd a way orward to renewed national solvency. We have to make a tough,
sometimes painul, transition away rom old patterns o debt, leverage, and debt-ueled
consumption toward a new economic model centered on higher saving, investment,
new business ormation, and job creation. Our goal should be to reboot a solvent
America that can compete, win, and grow in tough global markets. And its about time.
Because these budget debates we read about and see on TV every day are not media
hype. The surge in ederal spending since 2008 has our national debt growing by
about $2 million a minute. So i I talk this morning or hal an hour, were all going to
owe about $60 million more by the time I take questions. By next week, we will add
more than $20 billion to the national debt. Were on a dangerous, unsustainable
course, and no one can say we havent been warned.
We have been warned
Just last week the Wall Street Journalran two ront-page leads, letting us know that the
tectonic plates o the global economy are rumbling. First, we saw the S&P drop its long-
term outlook on U.S. debt prospects rom stable to negative, noting that they may
also lower Americas triple-A credit rating within two years. The next day, China took
I believe we all know in our
bones that Americas utureeconomy has to be very
diferent rom our recent
past. We cant go back to
2007, with an ocial
savings rate near zero,
houses turned into ATM
machines, and leverage
rising everywhere. We
shouldnt want to replay
that movie. We know how
it ended.
http://www.putnam.com/8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
2/12
2
new steps to make the yuan more readily available in global markets, one more step
toward being able to compete with, or displace, the dollar as a global reserve currency.
Some here may recall that just a ew weeks earlier, the International Monetary Fund had
questioned Americas credibility on our national debt. This week, the IMF issued a
report suggesting that Chinas economy could surpass Americas as early as 2016, in
purchasing power terms, not per capita. These are the kinds o signals that make it eel
as though history is on ast orward, and its not moving in our avor.
Americans are worried, and rightly so. Recent polls show confdence in our uture at an
all-time low. For the frst time ever, a majority o Americans expect that their childrens
utures wont be as good as theirs. Clearly, the ater-shocks rom the Great Recession,
especially stubbornly high unemployment, play into that. But so does concern about
Uncle Sams historic, post-crisis defcits.
Our defcits are among the worlds largest
2010 budget deficit as a percentage of GDP in some AAA-rated countries
U.S. U.K. France Canada Australia Germany
10.6% 10.4%
7.0%
5.5%4.6%
3.3%
Note: IMF calculations or the U.S. dier rom Congressional Budget Oce fgures, which put the U.S. defcit at
8.9% GDP.
Source: International Monetary Fund.
Federal defcits now claim a ar larger share o our economy than comparably rated
triple-A sovereigns, like the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Australia, and Germany.
When the worlds largest economy also runs the developed worlds largest defcits,
worry is well grounded, not hysterical. That may be one reason why the largest bond
house in America, PIMCO, announced some time back that they were getting out o U.S.
Treasury bonds.
Our political leaders show no sign o being willing to collaborate, or compromise, on
ways to deal with this at least not yet. Instead o serious bargaining and action to curb
long-term debt, this year in Washington promises little more than political positioning,
head butting, and games o chicken. Concern or Americas credibility and solvency
seems to be taking a back seat to the politics o the 2012 presidential election.
Federal decits now claim
a ar larger share o our
economy than comparably
rated triple-A sovereigns,
like the United Kingdom,
France, Canada, Australia,
and Germany. When the
worlds largest economy
also runs the developed
worlds largest decits,
worry is well grounded,
not hysterical.
We have to nd a way orward to
renewed national solvency. We
have to make a tough, sometimes
painul, transition away rom old
patterns o debt, leverage, and
debt-ueled consumption toward
a new economic model centered
on higher saving, investment,
new business ormation, and job
creation. Our goal should be to
reboot a solvent America that can
compete, win, and grow in tough
global markets.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
3/12
3
Americas national debt is skyrocketing
(%) 200
150
100
50
01930 19501940 19701960 1980 1990 2000 2010 2030E2020E
U.S. FEDERAL DEBT AS A PERCENTAGE OF GDP
Crash
of 2008
148%
Vietnam
War era
World War II
The GreatDepression
22%
108.6% Over 90%
Sources: Heritage Foundation compilations o data rom U.S. Department o the Treasury, Institute or the
Measurement o Worth (Alternative Fiscal Scenario), Congressional Budget Oce, and White House Oce o
Management and Budget.
While political kabuki plays occupy Washingtons attention, the national debt is skyrock-
eting. The Congressional Budget Oce advises us that President Obamas recent
budget would raise total national debt held by the public rom roughly 63% o GDP
today to more than 90% by 2020 with no end in sight! That is a debt-to-economy ratio
that America hasnt seen since World War II.
Interest costs on Uncle Sams debt will quadruple by 2020
800
600
400
200
0
INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS (2009)
2000 2020
$768.2
$280.1$186.9
Actual Projected
2005 2010 2015
($Billions)
Source: White House Oce o Management and Budget, 2010 estimates.
This fscal time bomb is ticking, and uture interest costs on our debt are on track to
explode. Unless we change course, interest on our debt will quadruple by 2020,
reaching nearly $800 billion a year. A sustained rise o just 1% in interest rates would add
$150 billion more a year to this burden! Albert Einstein once described compound
interest as the most powerul orce in the universe. And were gambling against it!
The Congressional Budget
Oce advises us that
President Obamas recent
budget would raise total
national debt held by the
public rom roughly 63% o
GDP today to more than 90%
by 2020 with no end in sight!
That is a debt-to-economy
ratio that America hasnt seen
since World War II.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
4/12
4
We now depend on oreign countries to fnance us
1970
Debt held by public:$283B
5%
1990
Debt held by public:$2.4T
19%
2010
Debt held by public:$8.4T
47%
Foreign holdings
Source: U.S. Department o Treasury.
Whats worse, we now depend on oreign creditors to fnance nearly hal o our debt,
about ten times as large a share as they held in 1970! Having just returned rom China,
I can tell you this: The whole world is watching us. They do expect us to get our act
together. They still believe we will. Thats the main reason why the U.S. Treasury canstill borrow huge sums o money 10 years out at roughly three and a hal percent.
But oreign confdence is defnitely not something we should take or granted. Just
over three years ago, in November 2007, Greece was able to issue 10-year bonds at
just 4.5% slightly less than the U.S. Treasury was paying then or our own 10-year
bonds. The Greeks cant do that anymore, can they?
Americas dependence on oreign buyers at our Treasury debt auctions makes us
dangerously vulnerable. I global investors conclude that our political leaders are unable
or unwilling to deal with our defcits and debt, we could lose a centurys worth o credi-
bility in a Shanghai minute.
So the way I see it, America doesnt really have a choice about coming to grips with our
debts and bringing government spending under control. The real choice we ace is
whether to act, or be acted on, by some very ruthless global markets. Thats why it is a
healthy sign that both parties, including President Obama and Republican leaders o
Congress, are at least talking about how to cut our defcit and control our debt, not
whether to deal with defcits but how. So lets hope that talk turns into action, preerably
in the current Congress, while America still has some maneuvering room.
The key driver is demographics
Heres the key driver o our defcits. America is aging, lie expectancy is rising, and were
seeing baby boomers turn age 65 at the rate o about 7,000 a day. Over the next 20
years, the number o Americans over age 65 will nearly double, rom 40 million to 72
million. Thats more people than all but a handul o member nations in the U.N.
And the central impact o Americas aging is this: Unless we see substantial reorms to
Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, these three entitlement programs alone will
grow by 2045 to absorb as much o Americas economy, 18%, as the entire ederal
governments tax revenue has averaged since World War II. So i we want government
Americas dependence on
oreign buyers at our Treasury
debt auctions makes us
dangerously vulnerable. So the
way I see it, America doesnt
really have a choice about
coming to grips with our debtsand bringing government
spending under control. The real
choice we ace is whether to act,
or be acted on, by some very
ruthless global markets.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
5/12
5
to pay or anything else whether that is the Marine Corps, Yellowstone Park, or
interest on the national debt we need to get serious about curbing entitlement costs.
Both parties will have to make some painul concessions, which neither seems quite
ready to do.
Unless there is reorm, entitlement costs will dominate uture ederal budgets
0
5
10
15
20
2005 2015E 2025E 2035E 2045E
Medicare
Medicaid
Social Security
Entitlements as percent of GDP
18%
(%)
Average total
tax revenue as
percent of
GDP
Sources: GAO Sept. 2004 baseline extended analysis; Bruce Bartlett, Tax Reorm Agenda or the 109th Congress
15 (2004).
More recent data not available at the time o this presentation.
In the absence o action, working Americans retirement confdence, as measured by
The Employee Beneft Research Institute (EBRI), hit a new low just last month. For the
frst time ever seen in EBRIs survey data, more people are now unsure o their retire-
ment uture than they are confdent.
No wonder that Americans retirement confdence has plummeted
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Confident Not confident
(%)
Source: Employee Beneft Research Institute and Matthew Greenwald & Associates, Inc., 19932011 Retirement
Confdence Surveys.
OK, thats it or the bad news. I know Ive given you a lot o it. So lets turn now to the
positive side o the ledger.
The central impact o
Americas aging is this: Unless
we see substantial reorms to
Social Security, Medicare, and
Medicaid, these three entitle-
ment programs alone will grow
by 2045 to absorb as much o
Americas economy, 18%, as
the entire ederal government
budget has averaged since
World War II.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
6/12
6
Our DC system gives us a great base to build on
The good news is that we do have a strong private savings system in this country: a
defned contribution workplace savings system that reaches more than 83 million
workers and rising. And we still have over 40 million people who enjoy defned beneft
coverage, though that number is at or alling outside the public sector.
This suggests to me that a key point o leverage or restoring confdence is this: I we
can strengthen the DC system and extend its reach, we can make huge strides toward
shoring up Americans confdence in their own utures. And theres every reason to
believe we can because the defned contribution system is dynamic, not static. It has
been changing and evolving or 30-plus years now, ever since the frst generation o
401(k) plans emerged in the 1980s.
Defned Contribution savings are both a huge success story and a great
base to build on
38
48
62
83
40
4239 40
42 42
75
20
35 38
0
25
50
75
100
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2008
American workers covered
DB plans
DC plans
(Millions)
Sources: Private Pension Plan Bulletin, Abstract o 2008 Form 5500 Reports, U.S. Department o Labor,
December 2010.
Collective Bargaining Status o Pension Plans, Total Participants by Type o Plan.
The Pension Protection Act o 2006 has revitalized DC
With the passage o the Pension Protection Act (PPA) o 2006, we took a giant step
toward making the 401(k), and defned contribution generally, Americas primary
retirement system.
The PPA endorsed three game-changing elements o workplace savings plan design:
auto-enrollment, savings escalation, and guidance to wise asset allocation. The law also
gave plan sponsors who adopted such designs strong legal protection against litigation.
Taken together, these core elements o plan design marked a qualitative shit or the
better. Today, the evidence on these policy innovations is in. We have essentially solved
the challenge o accumulation. We havent yet ully implemented this solution, but we
do know what works.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
7/12
7
The Pension Protection Act o 2006 has revitalized the DC system
$5,784
$6,109
$5,419
$5,063
$4,727
$4,431
$4,246
$3,549
$4,538
$4,229$3,708
$3,410
$3,087
$2,585
$2,765
$2,943
$3,084
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010E
2011E
2012E
2013E
2014E
2015E
($B)
Projected DC assets 19992015
Source: FRC Monitor, September 2010.
Recent research shows that young workers in plans that enroll them automatically, that
escalate their savings rom 6% or so to 10%, and that oer guidance to age-appropriate
asset allocation, mostly liecycle unds, should be able to replace between 40% and
60% o their pre-retirement incomes, just rom their DC plans! Thats beore you countSocial Security, other savings, home equity, lie insurance holdings, or any other assets
they may have. In other words, post-PPA, auto-pilot plans really do get the accumula-
tion job done.
As more and more plan sponsors adopt this approach, millions more workers are being
put on the right course. And the DC industry is being revitalized, with total assets
projected to reach over $6 trillion by 2015.
Now, DC aces a new threat
But as I mentioned earlier, we do ace a potential new risk, aimed right at the heart o
retirement savings, rom well-intentioned, but poorly thought through eorts in
Washington to cut ederal defcits.
To understand this risk, you need to see savings incentives through the bizarre lens
through which many budget hawks in Washington view the world. They view the
temporary tax orgiveness that retirement savers get or putting unds in an IRA, a
K-plan, or variable annuities as tax expenditures. They have no way o measuring any
dynamic beneft that savings may bring.
So its not surprising that both o the recent defcit commissions proposed caps on the
maximum amount o savings incentives they would allow. One o the commissions
actually proposed initially to sweep away all savings incentives, then backed o to
suggest a cap o $20,000 a year or 20% o salary, whichever is greater.
Now that may not seem terribly menacing. But once savings tax breaks are on the table,
then they are in play, and the temptation to cut deeply into them is great. I anyone here
thinks this risk is small or remote, remember the last major tax code overhaul in 1986,
when ceilings or 401(k) contributions were severely slashed and so many conditions
were placed on IRAs that their sales were stymied or years.
Recent research shows that
young workers in plans that
enroll them automatically, that
escalate their savings rom
6% or so to 10%, and that ofer
guidance to age-appropriate
asset allocation, mostly
liecycle unds, should be able
to replace between 40% and
60% o their pre-retirement
incomes, just rom their DC
plans! Thats beore you count
Social Security, other savings,
home equity, lie insuranceholdings, or any other assets
they may have.
Personal and workplace savings
are an essential element to
restoring Americas long-term
solvency because true solvency
includes strong household
balance sheets as well as a
sustainable ederal budget.
Every dollar o retirement
savings is one less dollar that
will be asked or rom the
government in the uture.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
8/12
8
Heres a quick glance at tax expenditures as they are seen by budgeteers in
Washington.
Tax expenditures in the bulls-eye: 2011 estimates
Home mortgage deduction: $119.9B
Workplace health plans: $115.2B
Total retirement savings: $117.8B DC plans: $32.6B
PB plans: $51.5B
Self-employed plans: $16.2B
IRAs and Roth IRAs: $17.5B
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation, January 2010 estimates ASSPA.
As you can see, retirement savings are right up there with workplace health deductions
and home mortgage deductions as possible targets or capping or elimination.
Let me be clear. I completely agree that the ederal defcit is a true national security issue.
We need to get defcits under control and get our economy growing aster than our
debts, or we will wreck the America we inherited. But whatever we do to curb ederal
defcits, we should never cut into incentives or personal or workplace savings. It would
be a truly grotesque policy mistake to try to curb government proigacy by undercut-
ting incentives or individuals and amilies to secure their own retirement utures.
True solvency includes strong household balance sheets as well as a sustainable ederal
budget. Every dollar that retirement savers set aside is one less dollar that will ever be asked
or rom the government in the uture. And the incentives or workplace savings do work, in
part by encouraging employers, especially small businesses, to oer plans to their workers.
Lets look at some numbers. Heres a look at the distribution o the tax breaks or work-
place savings by income level. Sixty-two percent o these tax deerrals go to people
earning less than $100,000, 38% to those earning more.
Share o tax expenditures going to workplace savers by income levels
30%32%
27%
11%
0
20
40
60
Under $50,000 $50,000$100,000 $100,000$200,000 $200,000 or more
Participants with access and retirees with account balances
(%)
Source: American Society o Pension Proessionals and Actuaries, 2011.
Some on the political let see this as an unair tax break to the auent, but lets compare
these tax deerrals; as you all know very well, these are just postponements, not ull
orgiveness to the taxes the recipients actually pay.
But whatever we do to curb
ederal decits, we should
never cut into incentives or
personal or workplace savings.
It would be a truly grotesque
policy mistake to try to curb
government proigacy by
undercutting incentives or
individuals and amilies to
secure their own retirement
utures. True solvency includes
strong household balance
sheets as well as a sustainable
ederal budget.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
9/12
9
Share o tax expenditures vs. share o ederal income taxes paid by
income levels
30%32%
27%
11%8%
18%
23%
52%
0
20
40
60
Under $50,000 $50,000$100,000 $100,000$200,000 $200,000 or more
Participants with access and retirees with account balances
Share of federal income taxes (after credits) paid
(%)
Source: American Society o Pension Proessionals and Actuaries, 2011.
Here, you can see again that 62% o these tax deerrals go to those earning less than
$100,000, but these low and middle income workers pay just 26% o ederal income
taxes, so they get more than twice as large a share o savings tax breaks as the share o
income taxes they actually pay. Thirty-eight percent o the tax deerrals go to those
earning more than $100,000, but these people pay 75% three quarters o all
ederal income taxes.
In other words, more auent earners get almost exactly hal the share o savings
tax breaks as they pay in taxes. That seems pretty air to me you might even say
progressive. And as Im sure you also know, under every serious Social Security
reorm proposal being discussed in Washington, low-income workers benefts will be
protected, as they should be, while the brunt o tax increases and beneft reductions
would all on upper-middle class and wealthy Social Security recipients. How, then,
would it be air, or politically easible or that matter, to also undercut these peoples
private savings eorts?
Let me suggest another reason or caution about any defcit or tax code change that
undercuts workplace savings, or the incentives many businesses have to oer them.
Percent o moderate income workers ($30,000$50,000) who save
or retirement
71.5%
4.6%
0
20
40
60
80
With access to workplace plan Without workplace plan IRA only
(%)
Source: Employee Benefts Research Institute (2010) estimate using 2008 Panel o SIPP (Covered by an
Employer Plan) and EBRI estimate (Not Covered by an Employer Plan-IRA only).
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
10/12
10
The impact o access
Access to workplace savings is vital to low- and moderate-income workers. Over 71% o
workers earning between $30,000 and $50,000 do save or retirement, but only i they
have access to payroll deduction savings plans at work. Among moderate-income
workers who lack access to savings at work, ewer than 5% set money aside to prepare
or retirement.
So capping or eliminating incentives or workplace and other retirement savings is
exactly the wrong direction to go. Moving in that direction could have devastating
impact, sending millions o low- and moderate-income workers toward retirement with
essentially no savings.
I hope that everyone here today will stand with me in opposing any reduction in savings
incentives, and I urge you to share that opinion with every member o Congress you
meet. We should not be cutting savings incentives; we should be doing everything we
can to expand workplace savings coverage or the many millions who lack it.
This is why Ive supported ideas like the auto-IRA payroll deduction proposal, a very
reasonable, cost-eective way to draw many millions o lower-income workers into
retirement savings, and give them a stake in our ree-enterprise system.
A new solvency
As this country grapples with both retirement issues, and the macroeconomic and
budget challenges they are part o, we need a new round o innovation, rom public policy
and rom the fnancial services industry, to move America toward what I have called a
New Solvency, grounded on higher savings, investment, and new business ormation.
The very frst step has to be admitting that our core entitlement programs need to be
reormed. As I see it, those politicians who deny that we even ace a real fscal problem,those who say we dont need to make any serious changes in Social Security or Medicare,
are the people who threaten to lead America straight into crisis, and then into truly awul
austerity, just as were seeing happen in Europe. I their kind o denial continues,
Americas entitlement programs will be slashed, but under extreme market pressures,
not through thoughtul policy reorm.
Those politicians and policymakers who are seeking good-aith, bipartisan solutions to
curb ederal spending and bring our defcits under control, are, in act, the truest
deenders o the common saety net. They are the real leaders, pointing Americas way
to fscal stability and a shot at renewed prosperity. And we can fnd them in both polit-
ical parties.
I believe the best frst step we could take would be to reach a grand bargain compro-
mise on Social Security, which may be the simplest part o our fscal challenge an
arithmetic problem, really even i it is one o the toughest politically. Both o the
recent defcit commissions oered reasonable solutions that would, in act, preserve
the essence o Social Security and protect the truly needy. But a deal here would almost
surely require Republicans to compromise on some measures to increase revenue,
The very rst step has to be
admitting that our core
entitlement programs need to be
reormed. As I see it, those
politicians who deny that we
even ace a real scal problem,
those who say we dont need to
make any serious changes in
Social Security or Medicare, are
the people who threaten to lead
America straight into crisis, and
then into truly awul austerity,
just as were seeing happen in
Europe. Those politicians andpolicymakers who are seeking
good-aith, bipartisan solutions
to curb ederal spending and
bring our decits under control,
are, in act, the truest deenders
o the common saety net.
Access to workplace savings
is vital to low- and moderate-
income workers. Over 71% o
workers earning between
$30,000 and $50,000 do save
or retirement, but only i they
have access to payroll deduction
savings plans at work. Among
moderate-income workers who
lack access to savings at work,
ewer than 5% set money aside to
prepare or retirement.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
11/12
11
while Democrats would have to concede that beneft increases will need to be slowed,
or means tested. So this will require real courage and leadership.
We should link a solvent Social Security system to reorms that strengthen private
workplace savings, including the payroll deduction auto-IRA, so we reach virtually all
working Americans. The best practices seen in leading plans, such as auto-enrollment,
savings escalation, and smart, age-appropriate allocation, should be made the norm or
all workplace plans.
Public policy should also encourage lively competition among a host o lietime income
vehicles, annuities, non-annuity drawdown unds, and other lielong income solutions,
within plans and beyond. And the next round o retirement and pension legislation
should oer plan sponsors who adopt these best practices strong legal sae harbor.
Personal solvency, based on solid savings rates and a revitalized, expanded workplace
savings system, complements and reinorces a national commitment to fscal health.
And a robust private retirement savings system also uels economic growth, the most
critical variable o all.
Pro-growth policies
Higher savings lower capital costs. They oster more investment in existing businesses
and the creation o new businesses that we cant even imagine. To help these additional
savings fnd their way to ruitul investments, we need a series o positive policies to get
our economy growing more rapidly, especially on the job ront.
High unemployment is doing more than anything else to undermine confdence. So
why dont we aim at the bulls-eye, private sector job creation, right now, in this
Congress. Just as we give tax breaks or research and or investing in new plants and
equipment, why not oer a direct incentive or private sector companies to hire people
here in America?
I call this the 1% solution. Lets give any company, large or small, that hires one percent
more U.S.-based workers, a 10% cut in any ederal business taxes they may owe. Lit
your work orce by 10% or more in a single year, and your business would have no corpo-
rate tax obligation at all that year, none. The idea is to power our way past this phase o
slow growth onto a stronger upward trajectory, so our economy can grow aster than
our debt, and deliver a huge shot in the arm to public confdence at the same time.
This same direct pro-growth, pro-job ocus should shape any uture eort the
Congress makes to overhaul our crazy, complex tax code. We need to shit tax policy
away rom encouraging debt and consumption to rewarding savings, investment,
and entrepreneurship.
Since most new jobs in our country come rom young, growing businesses, lets
encourage venture capital ormation, oering access to equity, not just loans, or start-
up businesses. Lets oer a multi-year holiday on capital gains rom any initial public
oerings that an investor holds or a year or two.
Personal solvency, based
on solid savings rates and
a revitalized, expanded
workplace savings system,
complements and reinorces a
national commitment to scal
health. And a robust private
retirement savings system also
uels economic growth, the
most critical variable o all.
8/7/2019 Robert L. Reynolds: Meeting America's Solvency Challenge
12/12
And lets acknowledge the vital role o talent, human capital, by encouraging the immi-
gration o more people who are willing to bring capital to America and launch a business.
Lets oer a ten-year green card to any oreign student who graduates rom an accred-
ited American university. We need their skills. I never think o these talented young people
or would-be investors as oreigners or aliens. I think o them as uture Americans.
ConclusionAs I said at the beginning, I am an optimist. You really have to be, dont you, i you are
lucky enough to be born in this country? People risk their lives to come here, every day.
And theyre right to want to.
So as scary as our defcits are, as huge as our national debt is, as stark a challenge as the
one we ace in securing our national solvency, America has dealt with much tougher
challenges beore. Im convinced we can meet this one, too, and reboot our American
dream. It will take common sense and some uncommon political courage. But all we
really need to do it, is the will.
The views and opinions expressed are those of Robert L. Reynolds, President and CEO,
Putnam Investments, are subject to change with market conditions, and are not meant
as investment advice. Mr. Reynolds is aliated with Putnam Retail Management.
Putnam Investments
One Post Ofce Square
Boston, MA 02109
putnam.com
TheRetirementSavingsChallenge.com
Putnam Retail Management 267968 5/11
http://www.putnam.com/http://www.putnam.com/