Jack
son
Co
thre
n, e
t al.
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yo
nd
or
On
the
we
b n
ob
od
y k
no
ws y
ou
’re a
n
W. Fre
drick (Fre
d) Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d Sp
atia
l Te
chn
olo
gie
s, De
pa
rtme
nts o
f Ge
oscie
nce
s,
An
thro
po
log
y an
d E
nviro
nm
en
t Dyn
am
ics Pro
gra
m, U
nive
rsity of A
rkan
sas
On
the
we
b n
ob
od
y k
no
ws y
ou
’re a
n
arch
ae
olo
gist
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Ove
rview
•B
rief e
xcursio
n to
bo
na
fidie
s
•C
on
side
ratio
n o
f wh
at “is” W
eb
2.0
an
d
wh
y do
we
care
?
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
wh
y do
we
care
?
•A
rcha
eo
log
y an
d W
eb
2.0
–3
.0 -
…..
•W
ha
t do
we
ne
ed
to d
o to
ma
ke it
ha
pp
en
an
d w
ha
t do
es th
is sessio
n te
ll us
ab
ou
t wh
ere
we
are
in th
is pro
cess?
2
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
A fe
w co
mm
en
ts on
my b
ackg
rou
nd
•A
rcha
eo
log
y is NO
T m
y day jo
b –
or a
t lea
st no
t a la
rge
fractio
n o
f it
•“W
ea
rer o
f ma
ny h
ats”
•H
ere
spe
ake
r wo
uld
typica
lly ma
ke a
ba
d jo
ke a
bo
ut im
pa
ct of
we
arin
g m
an
y ha
ts on
ha
ir follicle
s–
Pa
use
for p
olite
bu
t som
ew
ha
t un
com
forta
ble
lau
gh
ter
•Se
rved
as o
ne
of th
e fo
un
de
rs of:
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
•Se
rved
as o
ne
of th
e fo
un
de
rs of:
–(1
99
2) O
pe
n G
RA
SS Fou
nd
atio
n
–(1
99
4) O
pe
n G
IS Co
nso
rtium
•re
na
me
d O
pe
n G
eo
spa
tial C
on
sortiu
m
•w
ww
.op
en
ge
osp
atia
l.org
–(2
00
7) O
GC
ii•
Op
en
Ge
osp
atia
l Co
nso
rtium
Inte
rop
era
bility In
stitute
–R
/D fo
cus to
mo
ve p
roce
ss lesso
ns le
arn
ed
ab
ou
t de
velo
pm
en
t of
inte
rop
era
bility in
to b
roa
de
r un
iversity re
sea
rch
3
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
OG
C
•T
he
Op
en
Ge
osp
atia
l Co
nso
rtium
, Inc
(OG
C) is a
n in
tern
atio
na
l ind
ustry
con
sortiu
m o
f 34
7co
mp
an
ies,
go
vern
me
nt a
ge
ncie
s an
d u
nive
rsities
pa
rticipa
ting
in a
con
sen
sus
pro
cess to
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
pa
rticipa
ting
in a
con
sen
sus
pro
cess to
de
velo
p p
ub
licly ava
ilab
le in
terfa
ce
spe
cificatio
ns.
•O
pe
nG
IS® S
pe
cificatio
ns
sup
po
rt
inte
rop
era
ble
solu
tion
s tha
t "ge
o-
en
ab
le" th
e W
eb
, wire
less a
nd
loca
tion
-
ba
sed
service
s, an
d m
ain
strea
m IT.
4
….
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Wh
at is W
eb
2.0
?
•A
s we
’ve h
ea
rd .. th
e te
rm w
as first a
pp
lied
by
Tim
O’R
eille
y in 2
00
4
–“b
usin
ess re
volu
tion
in th
e co
mp
ute
r ind
ustry
cau
sed
by a
mo
ve to
the
inte
rne
t as a
pla
tform
.”
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
cau
sed
by a
mo
ve to
the
inte
rne
t as a
pla
tform
.”
•(Sir) T
im B
ern
ers-Le
e (a
ka “in
ven
tor o
f ww
w”)
–A
rgu
es th
at te
rm is m
ea
nin
gle
ss since
the
tech
no
log
y com
po
ne
nts h
ave
(esse
ntia
lly) be
en
in
pla
ce sin
ce th
e e
arly d
ays o
f we
b
•M
uch
discu
ssion
on
this …
.
5
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Hyp
e o
r rea
l?•
I’m g
oin
g w
ith re
al
..
–B
ut e
ssen
tially m
ore
rea
l as a
socia
lan
d in
stitutio
na
l
pro
cess a
nd
no
t (so m
uch
) as a
ne
w te
chn
olo
gy o
ne
•A
rgu
me
nts o
ver w
he
the
r its’ SO
AP
y or R
EST
ful a
re in
tere
sting
bu
t
esse
ntia
lly seco
nd
ary
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
–(g
roa
n fro
m a
ll tech
no
-we
nn
ies h
ere
be
fud
dle
me
nt e
lsew
he
re)
•A
s arch
ae
olo
gists (n
ote
qu
ick ha
t switch
) we
(of a
ll pe
op
le)
sho
uld
reco
gn
ize th
at th
ere
is a co
mp
lex in
terp
lay be
twe
en
tech
no
log
y an
d “so
ciety”
–H
ere
ide
as o
f Bo
ast a
nd
Bie
hl a
bo
ut kn
ow
led
ge
as p
erfo
rma
nce
are
pa
rticula
rly inte
restin
g a
nd
rele
van
t
–R
ole
of p
rese
nta
tion
to m
ultip
le a
ud
ien
ces
6
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Ba
sic de
finitio
n o
f We
b 2
.0…
•
To re
cap
itula
te a
nd
atte
mp
ting
to a
void
(to a
de
gre
e) te
chn
o-
ba
bb
le
•K
ey th
em
es
–S
ep
ara
tion
of co
nte
nt –
pre
sen
tatio
n –
serv
ices
•M
ust d
eco
up
le tra
ditio
na
l system
de
sign
an
d m
od
ula
rize a
ll
ele
me
nts
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
ele
me
nts
•E
ssen
tial so
tha
t sam
e co
nte
nt ca
n b
e re
pu
rpo
sed
–E
xam
ple
: sing
le d
ata
ba
se “b
ack-e
nd
” servin
g m
ultip
le w
eb
service
s with
da
ta
•M
od
ula
rizatio
n o
f pro
cesse
s into
we
b se
rvices a
llow
s be
st-of-
bre
ed
ap
p se
lectio
n a
nd
ma
sh-u
ps
•B
asis fo
r grid
com
pu
ting
–Fa
st inte
ractive
pa
ges
–A
rchite
cture
of p
articip
atio
n
–R
ich u
ser e
xpe
rien
ce
7
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
So w
ha
t ab
ou
t We
b 2
.0 a
nd
us?
•W
hy a
re w
e a
s (sorta
) tech
no
log
ists he
re g
iving
pa
pe
rs
on
…
–“H
ow
we
‘can
or o
ug
ht’ to
ad
op
t We
b 2
.0 in
…”
–o
r “ho
w o
ur e
fforts to
ad
op
t 2.0
are
he
lpin
g …
” Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
•R
ath
er th
an
as a
rcha
eo
log
ists, in th
eir n
atu
ral h
ab
itat,
givin
g p
ap
ers o
n “h
ow
the
RE
SU
LTS
of re
sea
rch u
sing
We
b 2
.0 ch
an
ge
d m
y (arch
ae
olo
gica
l) life?
”
–B
TW
-th
is state
me
nt is so
me
wh
at u
nfa
ir since
this w
as a
sessio
n e
mp
ha
sizing
the
tech
no
log
y no
t the
arch
ae
olo
gy -
bu
t
you
get m
y po
int.
8
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
It’s (no
t) the
tech
no
log
y stup
id *
•T
he
succe
ss of a
ny W
eb
2.0
“ap
plica
tion
” is b
uilt o
n a
fou
nd
atio
n
•T
ha
t fou
nd
atio
n is co
nte
nt
•A
ccess to
con
ten
t req
uire
s
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
9
* Apologies (but not recently) to Jam
es Carville
•A
ccess to
con
ten
t req
uire
s –
1) a
bo
dy o
f dig
ital
con
ten
t
–2
) ad
eq
ua
te co
ntro
l of o
nto
log
ies
an
d se
ma
ntics
such
tha
t the
con
ten
t is to so
me
de
gre
e
inte
rop
era
ble
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Dig
ital co
nte
nt a
nd
arch
ae
olo
gy
•Fo
r a W
eb
2.0
strate
gy to
be
succe
ssful th
ere
mu
st be
a
“critical m
ass” o
f inte
rop
era
ble
arch
ae
olo
gica
l dig
ital
con
ten
t
•T
he
re is a
“lot” o
f dig
ital a
rcha
eo
log
ical co
nte
nt, I w
ou
ld
sub
mit, “o
ut th
ere
” bu
t no
t a critica
l ma
ss (yet) …
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
sub
mit, “o
ut th
ere
” bu
t no
t a critica
l ma
ss (yet) …
•W
ith A
DS, D
AC
C, U
EE
an
d o
the
rs we
can
see
ho
w to
get to
the
de
stina
tion
•T
he
re n
ee
ds to
be
a (o
r a n
um
be
r of) “co
mm
un
ity of
inte
rest” sp
ecifica
tion
s ad
eq
ua
te fo
r inte
rop
era
bility
10
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Sign
ifican
ce o
f disin
term
ed
iatio
n a
s a
de
velo
pm
en
t drive
r
•T
he
prim
ary le
sson
lea
rne
d fro
m w
eb
de
velo
pm
en
t,
ge
ne
rally, is th
at th
ere
are
bo
at lo
ad
$(o
r €s o
r £s) o
f
mo
ne
y to b
e m
ad
e th
rou
gh
disin
term
ed
iatio
nCo
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
•T
he
“valu
e p
rop
ositio
n” fo
r disin
term
ed
iatio
n in
scho
larsh
ip g
en
era
lly, an
d a
rcha
eo
log
y rese
arch
spe
cifically, is m
uch
less cle
ar
•B
TW
-th
ere
isa
stron
g ca
se fo
r disin
term
ed
iatio
n in
CR
M
•In
US a
lon
e e
stima
tes a
re th
at th
ere
is ca $
1 b
illion
/yea
r
11
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sasSch
ola
rship
an
d W
eb
2.0
•If th
ere
are
bo
at lo
ad
s of m
on
ey to
be
ma
de
eg
os ca
n
(bu
t no
t alw
ays) b
e ch
ecke
d a
t the
do
or w
he
n…
–T
he
de
velo
pm
en
t of sp
ecifica
tion
s an
d sta
nd
ard
s are
a
CO
NSE
NSU
S pro
cesse
s
•C
orp
ora
tion
s wo
rk nig
ht a
nd
da
y for co
mp
etitive
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
•C
orp
ora
tion
s wo
rk nig
ht a
nd
da
y for co
mp
etitive
ad
van
tag
e b
ut it is (m
ore
ofte
n th
an
no
t) the
case
tha
t the
solu
tion
tha
t “win
s” the
con
sen
sus p
roce
ss
rea
lly do
es co
mb
ine
bo
th e
lega
nce
an
d u
sab
ility
•C
an
we
du
plica
te th
is succe
ss in a
scho
larly e
ffort?
12
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
De
velo
pm
en
t of a
con
sen
sus
com
mu
nity stru
cture
•T
he
rew
ard
structu
re in
arch
ae
olo
gica
l scho
larsh
ip (g
en
era
lly) pro
vide
s a
disin
cen
tive fo
r pa
rticipa
tion
in th
e co
nse
nsu
s pro
cess a
nd
, inste
ad
,
privile
ge
s the
ind
ividu
al
•T
his is p
articu
larly tro
ub
leso
me
in a
rcha
eo
log
ical w
ork w
ith re
spe
ct to
on
tolo
gy a
nd
sem
an
tic inte
rop
era
bility b
eca
use
of
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
on
tolo
gy a
nd
sem
an
tic inte
rop
era
bility b
eca
use
of
–T
he
stron
g lin
kag
e b
etw
ee
n p
restig
e a
nd
spe
cific on
tolo
gica
l po
sition
s
–H
istorica
l traje
ctory o
f the
se in
the
field
•It is critica
l tha
t we
restru
cture
this re
wa
rd syste
m
•H
ow
do
we
do
this?
–D
AA
CS a
nd
UE
E b
oth
pre
sen
ts som
e ve
ry use
ful p
roce
ss exe
mp
lars b
ut a
lso
som
e u
nd
ersta
nd
ab
le co
nce
rns a
bo
ut sca
lab
ility
–A
DS u
ser d
efin
ed
trails/fa
cets “u
sing
the
use
rs” an
d O
pe
n C
on
text a
ttribu
ted
tag
gin
g b
oth
pro
vide
evid
en
ce h
ow
too
ls can
ad
dre
ss som
e o
f the
se
13
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
Sep
ara
te th
e “d
ata
”
•O
ne
thin
g to
do
is to m
ore
force
fully co
nce
ptu
ally se
pa
rate
da
ta (o
bse
rvatio
ns)fro
m h
igh
er le
vel a
bstra
ction
s de
rived
from
the
m
•In
arch
ae
olo
gy m
uch
of w
ha
t pa
sses fo
r da
ta is in
stea
d a
n n
th-
ord
er a
bstra
ction
, ap
pro
ach
ing
info
rma
tion
bu
t no
t the
re ye
t
eith
er
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
eith
er
•If w
e ca
n se
pa
rate
the
se lo
gica
lly we
can
pro
vide
diffe
ren
t
ince
ntive
s for th
e d
issem
ina
tion
of e
ach
–A
nd
yes –
to th
e p
erso
n w
ith yo
ur h
an
d u
p in
the
ba
ck of th
e ro
om
-I
DO
rea
lize th
e co
mp
lexity a
nd
recu
rsive n
atu
re o
f the
linka
ge
be
twe
en
ob
serva
tion
an
d th
eo
ry
•E
mp
ow
er se
arch
en
gin
es a
nd
de
ep
acce
ss
•A
nd
the
n …
we
can
mo
ve to
wa
rds kn
ow
led
ge
14
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sasG
row
ing
the
dig
ital co
nte
nt
•In
a p
ara
llel e
ffort to
the
cha
nge
s ne
ed
ed
in th
e sp
ecifica
tion
pro
cesse
s, we
ne
ed
to cre
ate
ince
ntive
s for d
igita
l pu
blish
ing
an
d d
ata
distrib
utio
n
•R
eco
gn
ition
acro
ss discip
line
tha
t “pu
blish
ing
” da
tab
ase
s an
d
oth
er “p
rima
ry” co
nte
nt is e
qu
al to
(or g
rea
ter th
an
)
pu
blica
tion
of d
escrip
tive o
r synth
etic p
rose
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
pu
blica
tion
of d
escrip
tive o
r synth
etic p
rose
•N
ew
strate
gie
s discu
ssed
he
re a
nd
else
wh
ere
to re
du
ce “co
st”
(inte
llectu
al, tim
e a
nd
fiscal) o
f this e
ffort
–P
ersiste
nt U
RIs
–A
uto
ma
ted
imp
act a
na
lysis system
s
–In
teg
rate
ob
jective
of u
ltima
te d
igita
l con
ten
t on
we
b a
s pa
rt of A
LL
step
s in th
e b
asic w
orkflo
w
–C
ritical n
ee
d fo
r effe
ctive G
uid
es to
Go
od
Pra
ctice (cf A
DS
)
15
W. F
red
rick Lim
p
Ce
nte
r for A
dva
nce
d S
pa
tial T
ech
no
log
ies
Un
ive
rsity o
f Ark
an
sas
A d
iffere
nt kin
d o
f dig
ital co
nve
rge
nce
•W
e n
ee
d to
ackn
ow
led
ge
the
go
od
wo
rk we
’ve se
en
he
re a
nd
en
cou
rag
e it a
nd
oth
er co
ntin
uin
g e
fforts
•W
he
n th
e co
nte
nt a
nd
inte
rop
era
bility ca
tche
s up
to
the
tech
no
log
y -th
en
the
rea
l po
we
r of W
eb
2.0
(or 3
or
Co
mm
en
ts on
We
b 2
.0 a
nd
Be
yon
d
28
Ma
rch 2
00
8
Va
nco
uve
r BC
the
tech
no
log
y -th
en
the
rea
l po
we
r of W
eb
2.0
(or 3
or
the
sem
an
tic we
b) a
pp
roa
che
s can
flow
er
•W
e h
ave
a g
rea
t de
al o
f rea
lly ha
rd w
ork, m
uch
of it is
bo
ring
•G
iven
wh
at w
e’ve
see
n h
ere
I am
very o
ptim
istic …
16
