M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October 2004 1
Sci-Fi Tracker Performance• Software Status
– RF background simulation
– Beam simulation– Reconstruction– Data sample
• Expected performance• Performance• Emittance calculation• Summary
2
RF Background Simulation
• As described by Rikard at VC of 22/9/04• Software used from tag mice-0-9-10• Background generated in 100 jobs of 100
events each on CSF farm at RAL.• Total time to produce 10k events on CSF
was over 4 days!• Output files merged into one file that is then
used as input for each of the 10k event samples.
3
TURTLE Beam
• Added as G4MICE option• In CVS as tag mice-0-9-11• 720,000 events produced using the “June04”
configuration were provided by Kevin Tilley• Sample broken up into 72 sets of 10,000
events each for submission as jobs on CSF farm at RAL
4
Reconstruction
• TDC aspect of Digitisation is now more realistic (exact details of discriminators still to be perfected).
• Duplets (space point made from 2 views in a station) are now reconstructed and used in the pattern recognition.
• Individual clusters are used as separate measurements in the Kalman track fit.
• Still need to add the use of a field map (particularly with the more detailed simulation now in use) – currently assuming a fixed field!
5
Data Sample
• Four sets of events processed:– Various sets of 20k events to study effects of multiple
scattering, non-uniform field, etc...– 720k events with all physics processes, but no RF
background– 720k events with all physics processes and overlaid
RF background events– 7k events with 100x nominal RF background
• All performance plots are from the sample with nominal RF and all physics processes.
• A summary table at the end will show differences between performance with and without RF background
6
Expected Performance
• Expected momentum resolution based on “back of the envelope” calculations.
• Determine effect that multiple scattering will have on resolution.
• Predict resolution as a function of PT and PZ
7
No Multiple Scattering - PT
R
R
PT = Q B · R
PT = 0.52 MeV/c
PT / PT = R / R
PT = Q B R R / R
PT = 1.202 x R
R = 0.431 mm
R = 0.427 * 3.5 / √12
8
PT Resolution• From the previous slide, it is
clear that the PT resolution should be flat as a function of PT: PT = Q B R
• So long as the track does not have an excessively high PZ (resulting in the projection in XY being a small fraction of a circle), the PT resolution should also be flat in PZ
9
No Multiple Scattering - PZ
z
PZ = PT / tan()
tan() = d / dz
10
PZ Resolution• PZ = PT / tan()• The resolution in depends on the
radius of curvature: tan() = k / PT
• Therefore the uncertainty on PZ depends on the uncertainty in PT (which is fixed) and that in tan() in quadrature
• For cases of High PT, or Low PZ, the resolution in PT will dominate over the resolution in tan():
PZ = PZ x PT / PT
• High PT (100 MeV/c): PZ = 0.52 / 100 x 225 = 1.15 MeV/c
• Low PZ (150 MeV/c): PZ = 0.52 / 50 x 150 = 1.56 MeV/c
PZ2 = k1
2 + (k2 + k3 PZ)2
PZ2 = (k1 / PT)2 + k2
2
11
With Multiple Scattering
V X W
ms
z = 1.9 mm
X0 = 42 cm → x/X0 = 0.45%
ms = √2 x 13.6 MeV / cp x 0.053
100 < p < 350 MeV/c
68.76 < cp < 335.1 MeV
3.1 < ms < 14.9 mrad
Not to scale!
12
Point Resolution with MCS
• 3.1 < ms < 14.9 mrad
• Station is 1.9 mm thick
• Mean total momentum is 240 MeV/c, giving a typical ms = 5 mrad.
• MCS produces additional error on the point resolution of between 6 and 30 m.
• MCS has no appreciable effect on the resolution of measuring an individual point
13
Multiple Scattering - PT
Typical distance between planes
= 175 mm
Error on position = 175 * 5 mrad
= 0.875 mm
Resolution in R becomes 0.97 mm
PT = 1.202 x R
PT = 1.16 MeV/c
14
Multiple Scattering - PZ
• For case of high PT and high P, expect PZ to depend just on new PT:PZ = PZ x PT / PT
= 160 x 1.16 / 100
= 1.86 MeV/c
• In general, the effects of multiple scattering will increase as P drops, so expect resolution to approach no multiple scattering level at high P and PT, and get worse as the momentum drops.
15
Performance• Position resolution
– X, Y
• Momentum pulls– PX, PY and PZ
• Momentum resolution– PT, PZ
– PT versus PT, PT vs PZ
– PZ versus PT, PZ vs PZ
• “Primes” resolution– X’, Y’, T’
• Efficiency and Purity
16
X Position Resolution
RMS = 48.49 mm RMS = 0.391 mm
17
Y Position Resolution
RMS = 57.05 mm RMS = 0.392 mm
18
PX PY and PZ Pulls
19
PT Resolution
RMS = 28.65 MeV/c RMS = 1.75 MeV/c
20
PZ Resolution
RMS = 25.65 MeV/c RMS = 2.41 MeV/c
21
Resolution vs PT
22
Resolution vs PZ
23
X’ Resolution
RMS = 182.1 mrad RMS = 8.00 mrad
24
Y’ Resolution
RMS = 172.3 mrad RMS = 7.91 mrad
25
T’ Resolution
RMS = 5.48 x 10-2 RMS = 5.06 x 10-3
26
Efficiency vs PT
27
Efficiency vs PZ
28
Efficiency vs PT / PZ
29
Purity vs PT
30
Purity vs PZ
31
Purity vs PT / PZ
32
Emittance Calculation
• Analysis code developed by Chris:– Trace and phase space– Monte Carlo truth, reconstructed parameters, virtual
planes, ICOOL output files...– Can calculate 2D, 4D, 6D emittance, apply cuts, re-
weighting, etc...– Performance checked against ecalc9f
• For each 10,000 event run, calculate one value of emittance from Monte Carlo truth information and one from reconstructed track information.
• Determine resolution and bias in 4D (XY) emittance (TOF unavailable, hence no 6D emittance).
33
Emittance Resolution
RMS of True
RMS resolution (no RF)
RMS resolution (with RF)
RMS resolution (100x RF)
% RMS/RMS (no RF)
% RMS/RMS (with RF)
% RMS/RMS (100x RF)
X (mm) 48.49 0.390 0.391 0.384 0.80 0.81 0.79
Y (mm) 57.05 0.391 0.392 0.389 0.69 0.69 0.68
PT (MeV/c)
28.65 1.75 1.75 1.69 6.11 6.11 5.90
PZ (MeV/c)
25.65 2.41 2.41 2.43 9.40 9.40 9.47
X’ (mrad)
182.1 8.02 8.00 8.08 4.40 4.39 4.44
Y’ (mrad)
172.3 7.90 7.91 7.58 4.59 4.59 4.40
t’ (x10-3)
5.48 0.506 0.506 0.519 9.23 9.23 9.47
Efficiency in % Efficiency out % Purity in % Purity out % 4D bias % 4D resolution %
No RF 99.99(85) 99.81(17) 99.15(12) 99.17(66) -0.121 0.060
With RF 99.99(85) 99.83(43) 99.13(14) 99.17(57) -0.138 0.062
100x RF 100.(00) 99.(73) 95.(28) 96.(47) N/A N/A
Performance Summary: