8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
1/11
Central Information Commission,II,Floor,August Kranti bhavan, Bhikaji Kama Place
New Delhi- 110 067.
Madam/Sir,Re: Second Appeal under under Sec 19(3)of the Right to Information Act-2005
Name and address of the appellant: ShriGopal Soni, ([email protected])
(Tel.01452644106) C231,PanchSheel Nagar,Ajmer-305 004.
Name and address of the CPIO: Pranab Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO,New India Assurance Co. Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001.E-mail:
Name and address of the Central Public Authorityagainst the order of whom the appeal is
preferred: Renjit Gangadharan,Dy General Manager,New India Assurance Co.Ltd,{NIACL},87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001.
Particulars of the order against which the appeal is preferred:
HO Appeal No. 207/2013 dated 29.11.2013 ( annexure A4 )
Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of
the RTI Act to the detriment suffered because of prolonged denial of information
Brief facts leading to the appeal:The appellant ,an honest citizen of India sought information under RTI dated 2.08.2013( A1)pertaining to denial/forefeiture of Provident Fund (own contribution) on behalf of NIACL and the
officials involved in prolonged denial of P F. The NIACL CPIO submitted a rhetorically drafted
annexure suppressing the desired information .The appellant, vide appeal dt.30.09.2013
requested disclosure of information to FAA . However, the said Renjeet
Gangadharn who abused needless public money by air travel to CIC on 20th
May 2013 instead
of attending prescribed mode video conference from Mumbai tried to justify the reply of CPIO
Prayer or Relief sought: 1. The information pertains to Right to Life of the applicant, who suffers
as he does not compromise with dishonesty. kindly order for immediate disclosure of information.2. That obstruction to information be viewed seriously and responsible official be penalized under
Section 20 (10) of the Act.
Compensation Sought: The appellant prays for compensation as per clause in Sec 19(8)* of
the RTI Act related to the detriment suffered since long denial of information.
Grounds for the Prayer or Relief: 1.The RTI officials of the public authority argue like advocates
instead of application of mind.2. There is no attempt to ensure humanitarian disclosure of information either by CIPO or FAA
3. Vigilance pledge has been ignored by both CPIO and FAA WE, THE PUBLICSERVANTS OF INDIA, DO HEREBY SOLEMNLY PLEDGE THAT WE SHALL CONTINUOUSLYSTRIVE TO BRING ABOUT INTEGRITY AND TRANSPARENCY without fear or favour.Whether 2 sets of appeal attached:Yes
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
2/11
11.12.13 Second appeal RTI 2.8.13 vitt NIACL PFrev ribhav2 Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:54 PM
To: "segar.sampath" , "renjeet.gangadharan", "pranabkumar.sahu"
CPIO/FAA/Transparency OfficerNew India Assurance Co. Ltd,
87,M.G. road,Fort,MUMBAI-400001.Dear Sir,
Being an honest citizen of India who has not compromised with corruption in public lifeprevalent in the NIACL,I continue to be denied of every one of my constitutional and
humanitarian rights including my own Provident Fund.Please find attached copy of second appeal (RTI act).
regards,Shri Gopal Soni
C231,Panchsheel Nagar,AJMER-305004
A 6 Email: to [email protected] Kumar Sahu,,Chief MANAGER & CPIO,New India Assurance Co Ltd,
( NIACL),87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001
Madam/Sir,
Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005With reference to My application under the R.T.I.Act
2.8.2013 reply by you CPI/Ho/2013-14/189 suppressing the information
the applicant herewith files second appeal* against denial ofinformation by you as the CPIO and against the decision of
appellate authority under Appeal No.107/2013 that CPIO reply wasenough .Kindly be informed as above.
Shri Gopal Soni,C231,Panch Sheel Nagar,Ajmer -305004.(appellant)Enclosed: as above * Dt.11-12-2013
A7 Email: to [email protected] Gangadharan,Dy General Manager,New India Assurance Co Ltd, ( NIACL),
87,M.G.Road,Fort ,Mumbai-400001
Dear Sir,Re: Information of Second Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
3/11
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
4/11
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
5/11
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
6/11
Appellate Authority (RTI) 30.09.2013
New India Assurance Co. Ltd,87,M.G. Road, Fort,
Mumbai-400001.
Re: Appeal under the Right to Information Act-2005 application2.08.2013
Incomplete and mischievous reply of insurance company CPIO under CPI
cell/HO/2013-14/189 dated 03.09.2013*
Appeal:
The CPIO ,NIACL furnished an evasive, distorted and mischievousreply consisting of two pages.
The applicant submits that he has been denied of his own Provident
Fund which amounts to forefeiture of his provident fund.
The Head Office of the insurance company is bound to supply a
speaking order to justify denial /forefeiture of the provident fund(own contribution ) of the applicant.The appellant has never authorized any NIACL official to deduct from
his Provident Fund a single rupee without his explicit consent.
The CPIO,be ordered to supply the complete,correct and transparent
information of denial /forefeiture/deduction of provident fund of theapplicant including the details of officials responsible for illegal and
inhuman act.
That all information is essential to right to life of a hapeless citizen of India,
Yours sincerely,
Shri Gopal Soni, (appellant) [email protected]
C231, Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004 Tel.01452644106.*enclosed with annexure
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
7/11
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
8/11
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
9/11
Joint Secretary (Insurance ) 2.08.2013
Ministry of Finance,Deptt. of Financial Services
Room No. 3, Jeevan Deep Building
Parliament Street, New Delhi - 110 001
Sir, Re: Information under the RTI Act-2005
With reference to the above,the applicant is depositing the prescribed fee
*attached herewith.
1. The applicant seeks copy of his RTI application dated 15th
May 2013
that was forwarded by Ministry vide letter dated 3.06.2013 under F. No.
M-18011/45/2013-Ins.1
2. The applicant,being denied of his own provident fund to cause his death
as a poor man,in collusion by New India Assurance Company Ltd,high
ranking officials,seeks information of all rules,regulations under whichthe insurance company reserves right to forefeit* the provident fund of
an employee
3. Name and designation of all New India Assurance Company officials
who either individually or collectively ordered forefeiture* of
applicants provident fund.
*alternatively called deduction euphemistically
The cumulative effect is that those employees get relief who gratify the greed
of corrupt officials and the innocent ones suffer for years like the applicant
whisle- blower victimized on the charge of leaving HQ in retaliation of his
commitment for honesty and transparency in publif life as an RTI applicant.
Yours Sincerely,(SHRI GOPAL SONI),
C231,PANCHSHEEL NAGAR,
AJMER-305004. Tel.0145-2644106
Thanking You. enc.: IPO NO.17F 399482
Annexure: i fj fk V
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
10/11
pfu nk tulsod dhlwfp
Hk`k~Vkpkj dfrfeyhHkxr dk joS;k
fjdkMZ dvuqlkjxEHkhj dnkpkj
orZeku fLFkfr
1 osruekUd28470
fuyEcu ugh fd;kx;k t;iqj uxjesgh ek= ,dfdyehVj LFkkukUrj.k
fjor dlkFk jUxsgkFkidMk x;k 10Qjojh2009 d
R; QV lfgr lekpkj i= esdkfkr gus d ckotwn iwjk
osru ] yxkrkj osru of) dlkFk leLr ifjykHk tuojh2011 rd fn, x,-
2 osruekUd
22828
lh ch vk fjdkMZ eslfUnX/k d ckotwnekunkj deZpkfj;d ihNs/kdy rhuckj inUur
yxHkx 50 gtkj dhudn vekur jkfkxk;c ik x
orZeku kk[kk dk;kZy;Hkkjh
RC 26(A)1991 drgrCBI }kjk estj isuYVhvuqkklfud dk;Zokgh gsrq lh chvk lykg d njfdukj djpsrkouh ek= lsvipkfjdrkiwjh
3.osruekUd
26019
fjor [kjh dj.kesjUxsgkFk iDMs tkusdipkr Hkh t;iqjftyses tu lsod
Hk`Vkpkj fuokj.k C;wj}kjk tuojh 2003 esidMk x;k20 tqyk 2012 d, vkj lsdj]
rRdkyhu dk;ZdkjhdEiuh ps;j esu d
lkFk ns[kk x;k-
yxHkx 48 gtkj :i, ekfldosru dlkFk leLr ifjykHkLohr
ipkr inUufr dk volj
fn;k x;k
4,
osruekUd
13559
QtokMs dV gusd17 okZ ipkr Hkhuk r fuyfEcr gS ukgh c[kkZLr
lh ch vk ,Q vk vkj6-08-1996 dvuqlkj5-96 yk[k dk chek/k[kk/kMh
56 gtkj :i, ekfld osrut;iqj estulsod tgkQt nLrkost fn-27-07-93 disk fd;k
8/13/2019 Set 2.08,13 PF Denial NIACL Vitt Second Appeal
11/11