+ All Categories
Transcript
Page 1: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Sound Reflectors and the Projection of SoundKaegan Gregory

Page 2: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Overview of Prior Research• Every concert hall is unbalanced• Acoustic engineers adjust acoustics in

concert hallso Sound shellso Sound Reflectors

• RCHS auditorium adjusted with sound reflectors• Tested low, middle, and high

frequencies

Page 3: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound
Page 4: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Procedure• Test acoustics

o Low medium high frequencieso 9 points in auditorium

• Develop wooden sound reflectorso test, and revise positions

• Develop plastic sound reflectorso test, revise positions

• Analyze datao Standard deviation of low medium high

frequencies, this value is then plugged into ANOVA

Page 5: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound
Page 6: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Data: Control• Auditorium proved to be unbalanced• Seemingly random data• Odd acoustic trend• Average decibel level: 74.9 (average

throughout auditorium)• Data was expected

Page 7: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound
Page 8: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

• Position of 1st wooden reflectors

Page 9: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Data: Wooden Reflector (pos. 1)• Balance improved

o Still abnormalities in hot spots in auditorium, requiring further adjustment

• Data makes sense based on angles • Projected sound throughout auditorium• Average decibel level: 78

Page 10: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

• Graph of standard deviation of trials between left, center, and right

Page 11: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

• Position of 2nd wooden reflectors

Page 12: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Data: Wooden Reflector (pos. 2)• Balance further improved• Angles of reflection adjusted • Average decibel level: 77.5

Page 13: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

• Graph of standard deviation of trials between left, center, and right

Page 14: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

• Position of plastic reflectors

Page 15: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Data: Plastic Reflector • Balance improved to a standard

deviation of 1.36 (60% improvement from original)• Average decibel level: 76

Page 16: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

• Graph of standard deviation of trials between left, center, and right

Page 17: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Analysis• When all trials are compared, no

significant differences. (p=.071)• When control was compared to any

trial, there were significant differences (p=.011)o Shows that adjustments caused sound to be

reflected almost certainly not by chance

Page 18: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

What Does This Mean??• The sound reflectors proved to be a

practical solution for the RCHS auditoriumo Hot spots nearly eliminatedo more sound projectedo Materials fairly inexpensive

• Implementationo Beta testing (band/chorus)o Design improvemento Scaled enlargemento Suspension?

Page 19: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound
Page 20: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound
Page 21: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Music• Associate principal

flute ASYO• Associate principal

flute ESYO • 4th flute AYWS• 7th chair Allstate

band

Page 22: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Honors • Governor’s Honors

Program (flute/dance)o Music Theory Classeso History of Music classeso Solo and orchestral

performanceso Choreography techniqueso Modern, Jazz, MOJA, and

Ballet

Page 23: Sound Reflectors and the Projection of Sound

Movement• Founding member of Omni Free

Runningo Flowo Parkouro Trickingo Free Runningo Tumbling


Top Related