15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
1
Status of Bs Mixing at CDF
Joseph Kroll (Penn) & Franco Bedeschi (INFN Pisa)Mixing Analysis Coordinators15 October 2004 – CDF Collaboration Meeting
2nd St. Ocean City, NJ, 7 Feb 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
2
Outline:1.Physics importance & current knowledge of ms
2.Method of measurement3.Organization of CDF B mixing analyses4.Recent progress5.Summary6.Appendix: schedule
Manasquan Inlet, NJ, 25 December 2003
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
3
Goal of Flavor Physics
Measure parameters of the CKM Matrix
Test consistency: do measurements of the same parameter withdifferent decays & CP asymmetries give the same result?
Is it unitary? B0 flavor oscillations (md)measure one side
How do B0s oscillations (ms)
fit in this picture?
Why is ms consideredone of the most important Run II measurements?
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
4
Neutral B Meson Flavor Oscillations
Flavor oscillations occur through2nd order weak interactions
e.g.
Same diagrams and formula for ms for Bs except replace “d” with “s”
All factors known well except “bag factor” £ “decay constant”
md = 0.502 § 0.007 ps-1 (2%) (PDG 2004) from Lattice QCD calculations – see hep-ph/0406184
From measurement of md derive |V*tbVtd|2
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
5
B Meson Flavor Oscillations (cont)
If we measure ms then we would know the ratio ms/md
Many theoretical quantities cancel in this ratio, we are left with
from Lattice QCD – see hep-ph/0406184
Since Vts ¼ Vcb this gives us our sideThis is why ms ishigh priority in Run II
md well measured: |V*tbVtd| limited by theoretical uncertainties
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
6
Current Status of ms
Results from LEP, SLD, CDF I ms > 14.5 ps-1 95% CL
see http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/osc/winter_2004/index.html
Amplitude method:H-G. Moser, A. Roussarie,NIM A384 p. 491 (1997)
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
7
Experimental Steps for Measuring Bs Mixing
1. Extract B0s signal – decay mode must identify b-flavor at decay (TTT)
Examples:
2. Measure decay time (t) in B rest frame (L = distance travelled) (L00)
3. Determine b-flavor at production “flavor tagging” (TOF)
“unmixed” means production and decay flavor are the same
“mixed” means flavor at production opposite flavor at decay
Flavor tag quantified by dilution D = 1 – 2w, w = mistag probability
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
8
Measuring Bs Mixing (cont.)
4. Measure asymmetry
these formulas assume perfect resolution for t
Asymmetry is conceptual: actually perform likelihood fit to expected“unmixed” and “mixed” distributions
Measure md
to validate procedure
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
9
Comment on : Time Integrated Mixing
is the time integrated mixing probability
In principle, a measurement of determines m - the first Bd mixing measurements were measurements - d = 0.186 § 0.004 (PDG 2004) - this does not work for Bs: s = 0.5 (the limit as x!1)
A measurement of
is very interesting
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
10
B Flavor Tagging
We quantify performance with efficiency and dilution D
= fraction of signal with flavor tag
D = 1-2w, w = probability that tag is incorrect (mistag)
Statistical error A on asymmetry A (N is number of signal)
statistical error scales with D2
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
11
Two Types of Flavor Tags
Opposite side
Same side Based on fragmentation tracks or B**
+ Applicable to both B0 and B0s
− other b not always in the acceptance
− Results for B+ and B0 not applicable to B0s
+ better acceptance for frag. tracks than opp. side b
Reminder: for limit on ms must know D
Produce bb pairs: find 2nd b, determine flavor,infer flavor of 1st b
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
12
Same Side Flavor Tags
Based on correlation betweencharge of fragmentation particleand flavor of b in B meson
Decay of P-wave mesonsB** also contributesto B0, B+ (not B0
s)
Expected correlationsdifferent for B+, B0, B0
sTOF
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
13
Illustration of Bs Oscillations
Example of Asymmetrywith lots of statisticsms = 20 ps-1
Illustrated are - tagging reduces statistics dilution reduces amplitude - decay length resolution damps amplitude further - momentum uncertainty damps amplitude more as decay time t increases
Large ms: Bs! Ds l no goodneed fully reconstructed decayse.g., Bs! Ds
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
14
CDF Bs Mixing History & Organization
• Expected Bs mixing to come early in Run II– turned out not to be the case
• Bs task force created by Tony Liss late Fall 2003• Task force report issued June 2004 (CDFNOTE 7042)• MACs appointed to help organize & coordinate
– Franco Bedeschi (INFN-Pisa) & Joseph Kroll (Penn)
• MACs began in June 2004• Have held three workshops
– 9 June 2004– 12 July 2004 (close out on 14 July)– 1 October 2004
• Current focus is Winter Conferences 2005• Also planning for longer term: Summer 2005 & beyond
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
15
Workshop Agenda from 1 October 2004
• Flavor tagging continued– PID around B mesons (D. Usynin/Penn)– SSKT MC studies (P. Catastini/Pisa)– Status of PID (R. Snider/FNAL)
• Fitting for md
– Terms for likelihood (I. Kravchencko/MIT)– md with J/ K (N. Leonardo/MIT)– md with semileptonics (G.Giurgiu/CMU)
• Preparing for results on ms
– t in SST biased samples (discussion)– Summary and Schedule (J. Kroll/Penn) see
B meeting on 14 October
• Introduction (F. Bedeschi/Pisa)• Proposal for blind analysis (G. Punzi/Pisa)• Status of data sets (Ch. Paus/MIT)• Signals
– Semileptonic (G. Gomez-Ceballos/MIT)– Hadronic (A. Belloni/MIT)– Ds
+! K0S K+ (M. Casarsa/Padova)
• Status of lifetimes– Semileptonic (S. Farrington/Liverpool)– Hadronic (F. Azfar/Oxford)
• Flavor tagging– Summary of OSTs (I. Kravchenko/MIT)– Plan for SSKT (F. Bedeschi/Pisa)– Monte Carlo Tuning (E. Ben-Haim/Paris6)
also involved: ANL, Brandeis, Cantabria, Chicago, Geneva, JHU, Karlsruhe, LBNL/Berkeley, Pittsburgh, Purdue, Rome, Tsukuba, Yale
Big effort involving > 20CDF institutions
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
16
Significant Progress Since June 2004
• Blessed Mixing w SST & OST in l + D (CDFNOTE 7127)
• Blessed update mixing w SST in hadronics (CDFNOTE 7145)
• Blessed several flavor tags– improved soft muon tag (CDFNOTE 7043)– improved/extended jet charge tag (CDFNOTE 7131)– new soft electron tag (CDFNOTE 7121)
• Blessed improved evaluation of sensitivity (CDFNOTE 7170)
• Updated semileptonic/hadronic signals (PR plots)• All of above presented at ICHEP 2004 (50% B Summer 04 results)• improved lifetime resolution w event-by-event PV & L00• Studies of SSKT underway – using TOF & dE/dx, MC tuning• Working towards competitive limit on ms for Winter 2005
– summary of activities with people & schedule appended at end of talk
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
17
Examples of Progress on B0s Signals
“Golden mode” Ds mode
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
18
Examples of B0 & B+ Calibration Signals
6 & 8 track modes!
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
19
Progress on Lifetimes
Know how to measure lifetimeswhen there is no SVT trigger bias
Do we get correct lifetime from SVT biased signals?
CDF: B+)=1.662 § 0.033 § 0.008 ps(PDG 2004 (B+) = 1.671 § 0.018 ps)
Outstanding mystery in lepton + SVT sampleExpect 488 m (14)
Recent progress in understandingwhat is NOT the problem
Need result from B! D (2 SVT)
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
20
Results on Opposite Side Flavor Tags
Lepton tags
Jet charge tag
Kaon tag
mistags from
SLT(): D2 = (0.70 § 0.04 § 0.05)% SLT(e): D2=(0.37 § 0.03 § 0.06)%
jet from b (b) has negative (positive) charge on average
Run II:D2 = (0.72 § 0.03)%
lower higher D
higher lower D
Largest D2 @ B factories Run II: no useful tag yet(have seen D, too low)
TOF
includes lifetime info too
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
21
Fully Exploit Tag Power by “Binning”
B
pTrel
pTrel
Larger pTrel increases b!
suppresses b! c!, fakes
e.g., pTrel for soft leptons
Dilution dependence determined from dataRequires enormous statistics of lepton + SVT sample
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
22
Fully Exploit Tag Power by “Binning”
Dilution increases with Q_{jet}e.g., Qjet for jet-charge
Need unbinned likelihood fit to exploit dilution binning
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
23
Progress on Same Side (Kaon) Tagging
• SST (re)established in Run II in B0 mixing– B0: D2 = (1.04 § 0.15 § 0.17)%
– B+: D2 = (4.69 § 0.49 § 0.36)%
• SSKT predicted to be most powerful flavor tag for Bs
• Problem: cannot measure D without seeing oscillations– Limit requires knowledge of D (to predict sensitivity)
– do not know if Monte Carlo prediction of D is reliable
• Have ambitious program to compare data and MC for SST– established short term goals
• comparison of fragmentation particles in Monte Carlo to data
• establish B** signals
• measure kaons around B+, B0, Bs in data & MC – should see difference
• Best performance of dE/dx and TOF is critical
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
24
Fit for md & D in lepton + D with OSTs1st time in Run I or II (only SST in Run I)
D = (28§2)% soft muon tag
SECVTX Jet ChargeD = (19§ 1)%
md = 0.593 § 0.53 ps D2 = 0.8% (OST only) D2 = 1.8% (OST & SST)
These are binned asymmetry fitsDo not exploit full power of OSTs(binning in Qjet, pT
rel not used)
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
25
ICHEP 2004: Our Projected Sensitivity
Baseline: D2 = 1.6% (OST only) = 67 fs (achieved)
Stretch: D2 = 2.6% (add SST) = 47 fs (L00, event by evt. PV)
Uses full unbinned likelihood to estimate sensitivity for l Ds
See CDFNOTE 7170 v2.0
(more like 74 fs)
(OST is SLT(e) = 0.4% + SLT() = 0.7% + JQT = 0.7%)
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
26
ICHEP 2004 Projected Sensitivity (cont)
Hadronic Semileptonic
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
27
ICHEP 2004 Projected Sensitivity (cont)
Message: even with only OSTcould have sensitivitycomparable to best experiment.
Combined semileptonic and hadronic
Good motivation to work hard
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
28
Highest Priority Items
1. Unbinned likelihood fit for md exploiting full power of flavor tags, event by event t, S/B in different modes, etc.
2. Resolve lifetime problem in semileptonic modes (l Ds)
3. Measure lifetime in SVT-biased hadronic modes (Ds, etc.)
With blessed OST’s, 1, 2, & 3 may be enough to say something
to accomplish 1. we must
in parallel with 1, 2, 3 4. Study SSKT – determine defensible D from data and MC
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
29
Summary
• Large group of people (> 20 institutes) dedicated to crucial components of Bs mixing measurement
• Significant progress was made this summer – we continue to work towards a 1st result in Winter 2005
• A lists of tasks with responsible people & deadlines is available – see Appendix to this talk. It will continue to evolve.
There is still room to get involvedThis is a long term analysis
It is a collaborative effort“No physicist left behind”
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
30
Appendix: Schedule
Notes:1. There is a web page in preparation – see B web page2. The names on the following schedule indicate the people who are responsible for the particular tasks now & in the future. Many other collaborators contributed to these tasks
in a significant way in the past.
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
31
Schedule
• We have put together a list of tasks
• Each task has– list of people doing the work
• these people are considered “responsible” for delivering
– the venue where they report the results of their work• specify the subgroup or B group
– the various near term tasks including time estimates
– long term tasks have more vague time estimates
• Weekly status reports– we want status reports at subgroups on key tasks every week
– does not have to be full presentation, can be one slide on previous week’s activities
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
32
Data Sets
• Data set definition– 5.3.X
– all data up to August 2004 shutdown except COT compromised
• Good run list– Furic & Nahn
– reports at BPAK
– by 4 November 2004
• Skim of SVT two track data set– Belforte, Casarsa, Delli, Fella,
Lucchesi
– reports at BPAK
– 2 sections of the data• up to 13 February 2004
• after COT recovery
• Skim (continued)– Status of data up to 13 Feb 2004
• Bs! Ds, Ds! K*K or KSK complete
• finish other 7 modes by 4 Nov 2004
• B-! D0-, D0! K+-, K+-+-, K+K-, +-
• B0! D-+, D-! K-++
• B0s! Ds
-+, Ds! ,
– post COT recovery data• processing in parallel with above
• complete by end of November 2004
– Some modes not included• e.g., B! D* & D• can be added – no time estimate
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
33
Data Sets (continued)
• B Sntuple– Paus
– reports at BPAK
– based on 5.3.1
– includes all modes
– will include all data to Aug 2004
– J/ K by 18 Oct 2004
– lepton + D by 26 Oct 2004
– B hadronic by 8 Nov 2004
• Direct access to data (datlists)– Furic & Paus
– reports at BPAK
– available 1 Dec 2004
• Comments– must do better for Summer 05 &
beyond• need to start organizing this now
• volunteer (BPAK) needed
– for Winter 2004 success of datlists is critical
– B sntuple• no update of TOF possible
• event by event PV, L00 not included in present production
– 1 Oct 2004: Ch. Paus reports 30 pb-1 data bad due to CMX – use anyway?
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
34
Signal Optimization
• Hadronic modes– Casarsa, Lucchesi, Squillacioti, Shapiro
– reports at B Hadronic
– complete by 4 Nov 2004
• Semileptonic modes– Gibson
– reports at Semileptonics
– update on 26 Oct 2004
– schedule for finalizing not established
Concern: inadequate personnel and coming too late
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
35
Lifetimes
• Semileptonic– Clark, Farrington, Tanaka,
Ukegawa, Uozumi
– reports at Semileptonics
– near term (by 4 Nov 2004)• Tanaka x-check of l + D+
• d0 cut on D* (D+, D0 too?)
• generate more c-cbar MC
• result in 8 GeV (no SVT)
– long term (no estimate)• have to see results of near term
to decide how to proceed
• Hadronic
• “MC free” approach– Azfar, Boudreau, Huffman,
Rademacher, Rahaman
– reports at B hadronic
– fitting test and refinement• Azfar, Rademacher
• B+! D0+ in progress
– stripping & ntuple production (data & MC)
• Azfar, Rahaman
• B+! D0+ done
• B0, Bs, &b modes in progress
• complete by 4 Nov 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
36
Lifetimes (continued)
• Hadronic “MC free” continued– Systematics
• alignment (Boudreau, Rahaman)
• SVT eff. (Azfar, Rademacher)
• background parameterization (Huffman, Rademacher)
• all in progress already for B+ mode – done by 4 Nov 2004
• others follow later
• Hadronic – SVT eff. method– Da Ronco, Donega, Giagu,
Giolo, Lucchesi
– update SVT curves by
4 Nov 2004
– preliminary result (lifetime okay or not okay) by 22 Nov 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
37
Opposite Side Flavor Tags
• Validation of blessed Summer 2004 SLT(), SLT(e), JQT– Giurgiu, Kravchenko
– reports at Semileptonics
– means putting taggers in repository & verifying we get the same results
– complete by 19 Oct 2004
• Creation of simple combination of above tags– Giurgiu, Kravchenko
– reports at Semileptonics
– determine tag overlaps and combined D2 (including binning) on J/K • report on 19 Oct 2004
– evaluation of more sophisticated combinations (max D, diff. classes)• time scale not established
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
38
Same Side (Kaon) Tag
• Further development of SS(K)T– Bedeschi, Catastini, Punzi, Scuri, Squillacioti– reports to Semileptonics– compare SS(K)T algorithms in data & MC using J/ K samples
• use combined dE/dx & TOF particle ID• report by 4 Nov 2004
• Study particle species produced around B+, B0, B0s
– Heijboer, Jones, Kroll, Usynin– reports to Semileptonics– Measure particle species in data
• initial report using private TOF calibration in July 2004• further progress requires updated TOF calibration and B Sntuples
– MC production in parallel – estimate Dec 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
39
Same Side Kaon Tag (continued)
• Comparison MC & data, tuning fragmentation– Ben-Haim, Maksimovic, Pursley
– reports to Monte Carlo & Semileptonics
– update on 4 Nov 2004
• B** – Ben-Haim, Maksimovic, Pursley
– reports to J/ & B hadronics
– signal in B+! J/ K+ (update 4 Nov 2004)
– signal in SVT hadronic samples (December?)
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
40
Likelihood Fitting for md
• MIT/Cantabria/Karlsruhe– Belloni, Gomez-Ceballos,
Kravchenko, Leonardo, Paus, Piedra
– reports to Semileptonics
– likelihood fit B!J/ K with SST exists – see last workshop
– need to add OSTs
– developing fits for l + D &
D, D3– Fully tested with preliminary
result on md by 1 Dec 2004
• Argonne/CMU– Giurgiu, Paulini, Tanaka
– reports to Semileptonics
– full likelihood for ms exists; used for ICHEP 04 projections
– developing for md w l + D incorporating blessed OSTs
• 1st version fit working and tested on toy MC – see last workshop
• working on including tagging & vertexing in data ntuple – report at 4 Nov 2004
• run on MC to determine add. K factors: 30 Nov 2004
• 1st result on md by 7 Dec 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
41
Result on ms
• Difficult to work this far ahead – we can work backwards from La Thuile & draw some conclusions:– 24 Feb 2005 last day to bless results for La Thuile
– 17 Feb 2005 unblind results on ms
– 03 Feb 2005 prebless results on ms
– 20 Jan 2005 bless results on md for ms (Collaboration mtg.)
– 06 Jan 2005 prebless results on md for ms
• Better have full likelihood machinery for md determination using hadronic and semileptonic samples and OSTs before the Winter holiday – this includes a substantial amount of documentation prepared.
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
42
In Preparation for ms
• Decision on blinding procedure– Punzi
– reports to B meeting
– written proposal submitted to B group before 4 Nov 2004
– present at workshop on 4 Nov 2004, sign off at following B meeting
• Quantities for input to likelihood fit (flat file content)– Kravchenko & Tanaka
– reports to semileptonics
– written proposal submitted to B group before 4 Nov 2004
– present at workshop on 4 Nov 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
43
Common Tools
• dE/dx in COT– COT dE/dx group (Giagu)
– reports to BPAK group
– validation of entire data set up to Aug 2004 shutdown in progress
– ready for 5.3.4 release on 29 Oct 2004
• TOF– TOF group (Snider)
– reports to BPAK group
– in process of revising/validating calibration schemes
– hope to be ready for 5.3.4 release on 29 Oct 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
44
Common Tools (continued)
• Combined dE/dx & TOF PID– Ciocci, Morello, Punzi, Squillacioti,
Tonelli
– reports to BPAK
– available now in private version: resolution functions for each particle type separately for dE/dx & TOF
– include in public code infrastructure by 18 Oct 2004 – validate
– include in 5.3.4 release on 29 Oct 2004
– include combination of TOF and dE/dx for 29 Oct 2004 release
– demonstrate utility with examples by 4 Nov 2004
• Event by Event Vertexing incl. L00– Cerri, Lucchesi, Shapiro
– reports to BPAK
– code available & will be in 5.3.4 rel.
– documentation by 4 Nov 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
45
Monte Carlo Production
• Oversight of Monte Carlo Generation/Production– D’Auria
– reports to Monte Carlo
– outstanding issues• existing MC samples produced by various groups privately not registered
• only aware of one collaborative effort to generate MC for semileptonics– see talk by Usynin at semileptonics subgroup on 28 Sep 2004
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
46
Some Concluding Remarks
• We have made progress assigning tasks and making a schedule
• The schedule needs to be studied further to see if we are on target to have a result for Winter 2005
• Particular concern is Dec 2004 – how do we go from 1st results on md to documented blessed results by early Jan 2005?
• Two more workshops planned in 2004– November 3 & 4
• off week – we thought it would help to spread the pain over 2 days
– December 16
15 October 2004 Kroll/Bedeschi Collaboration Meeting
47
Calendar
on week
proposedB mixingworkshop
Collaborationmeeting
last Thursdaymeeting
Gasp! now we are here!
La Thuile begins here
holiday
Better get back to work