1
Review ArticleStructure and properties of polymer clay
nanocomposites: A Report
Aniagbaoso Ikenna Kingsley
Department of Polymer and textile Engineering,School of Engineering and EngineeringTechnology, Federal university of Technology Owerri,P.M.B 1526. Owerri, Imo State , Nigeria.
ABSTRACT
An overview of the progress in polymer nanocomposites is presented in thisseminar paper with an emphasis on the different structure and properties ofpolymer/ clay nanocomposites and the extent to which these properties have beenenhanced. Other related areas that are also discussed include the differentmethods used for preparing polymer-layered silicate (PLS) nanocomposites usingthe aluminum silicate clays, the types of PLS nanocomposites morphologies thatare most commonly achieved, the methods used for examining their structure andtheir possible relevance and application in the industry.
2
INTRODUCTION
Polymer/Clay Nanocomposites which can be abbreviated to ‘PCNC’ are a new
class of composites that consists of dispersed particles in a polymer matrix. The
dimensions/geometry of these dispersed particles is in the nano-range. The use of
nanometre grains, fibres, and plates have dramatically, increased the surface area
(i.e bulkness) of the pristine polymer when incorporated into the polymer matrix.
In addition studies have shown that polymer/clay nanocomposites have a number
of significantly improved properties compared to their convectional material such
as; tensile strength, modulus, heat destruction temperature, gas barrier properties,
flame retardant properties e.t.c.
Polymer/clay nanocomposite (PCNC) materials are of interest as a result of their
wide range of novel physical properties. They often have properties that are
superior to conventional microscale composites because of the strong interaction
between components and can be synthesized using simple and inexpensive
techniques. This aspect of nanotechnology in particular has strategically set a new
pace in the areas of engineering , science and technology over the last decade and
has found applications as engineering plastics, polymer product, rubbers, adhesives
and coatings.
The reinforcing filler material for a polymer-matrix nanocomposites can be made
up of Particles (e.g. minerals such as graphite, glass), fibres (e.g. carbon nanotubes
3
or electro-spun fibres), or Sheets (e.g. exfoliated clay stacks). The reinforcing sheet
made from layered silicates (silicate clay) is going to be the major case study in
this seminar paper. Invariably, it means that polymer layered silicate (PLS)
nanocomposites is a type of polymer/clay nanocomposites.
Over the past years, Interest in polymer layered silicate (PLS) nanocomposites has
rapidly been increasing at an unprecedented level, both in industry and in
academia, due to their potential for enhanced physical, chemical, and mechanical
properties compared to conventionally filled composite (Gilman, W. et al, 1999).
They have the potential of being a low-cost alternative to high-performance
composites for commercial applications in both the automotive and packaging
industries.
The most heavily used filler material is based on the smectite class of aluminum
silicate clays, of which the most common representative is montmorillonite
(MMT). MMT has been employed in many PLS nanocomposite systems because it
has a potentially high-aspect ratio and high-surface area that could lead to
materials which could possibly exhibit great property enhancements. In addition, it
is environmentally friendly, naturally occurring, and readily available in large
quantities. The earliest motivation for the use of nanoparticles seems to have been
stimulated by the Toyota research group, where the first practical application of
nylon-6–montmorillonite (MMT) nanocomposite was commercialized. With only a
4
small MMT loading (4.2 wt%), the modulus doubled, the tensile strength increased
more than 50%, the heat distortion temperature increased by 100◦C, and
combustion heat release rate decreased by up to 63% (Fornes, D, 2001). However,
in general, all the promises and claims that the addition of nanoparticles to polymer
matrices will miraculously lead to exceptional mechanical properties have not been
completely fulfilled because the improvements in properties seem to plateau at
levels of about 4 wt%. In nylon-6 (N6), levels of 7wt% have been reached because
of hydrogen bonding between the amide groups and the nanoclay particles (Fornes,
D, 2001).
Layered silicates in their pristine state are hydrophilic. Most of the engineering
polymers are hydrophobic. Therefore, dispersion of native clays in most polymers
is not easily achieved due to the intrinsic incompatibility of hydrophilic-layered
silicates and hydrophobic engineering polymers. In order to have a successful
development of polymer-clay nanocomposites, it is necessary to chemically
modify natural clay so that it can be compatible with a chosen polymer matrix.
According to Krishnamoorti, this can be done through ion-exchange reactions that
replace interlayer cations with quarternary alkylammonium or alkylphosphonium
cations. It is well established that when layered silicates are uniformly dispersed
(exfoliated) in a polymer matrix, the composite properties can be improved to a
dramatic extent. Hence, in order to capitalize on the potential offered by
5
nanoparticles in areas such as reinforcement, barrier, and electrical conductivity,
higher loadings of fully dispersed nanoparticles must be obtained. In this seminar, I
will review the techniques that have been used to exfoliate nanoparticles, the
structure and properties and the many relevance of this nanotechnology to our
engineering.
1.0 DIFINATION OF TERMS
6
Composites: This is a material that is made up of multiple components, compound
or complex substances.
Nanotechnology: This is the science and technology of creating particles and of
manufacturing machines which have sizes within the range of nanometers (i.e 10-
9).
Nanoparticles: These are particles between 1 and 100 nanometers in size. It can
be defined as a small object that behaves as a whole unit with respect to transport
and properties.
Polymer: is a large molecule (macromolecule) built up by the repetition of small
chemical units.
2.1 NANOCOMPOSITES
Nanocomposite is a multiphase solid material where one of the phases has
dimensions of about 1-100 nanometers (nm), or structures having nanoscale repeat
distances between the different phases that make up the material. In the broadest
sense this definition can include porous media, colloids, gels and copolymers, but
is more usually taken to mean the solid combination of a bulk matrix and nano-
dimensional phase(s) differing in properties due to dissimilarities in structure and
chemistry.
7
In mechanical terms, nanocomposites differ from conventional composite materials
due to the exceptionally high surface to volume ratio of the reinforcing phase
and/or its exceptionally high aspect ratio. The area of the interface between the
matrix and reinforcement phase(s) is typically an order of magnitude greater than
for conventional composite materials. The matrix material properties are
significantly affected in the vicinity of the reinforcement. There are three major
matrix material used in the nanocomposites formation. Namely;
1) Metal-matrix nanocomposites: Metal matrix nanocomposites can also be
referred to as reinforced metal matrix composites. This type of composites
can be classified as continuous and non-continuous reinforced materials.
One of the most important nanocomposites is Carbon nanotube metal matrix
composites, which is an emerging new material that is being developed to
take advantage of the high tensile strength and electrical conductivity of
carbon nanotube materials.
8
Fig.1 Nanocomposites formed from a metal matrix
2) Ceramic-matrix nanocomposites: In this group of composites, nanofillers
are incorporated into the interstitial spaces of a ceramic, i.e. a chemical
compound from the group of oxides, nitrides, borides, silicides etc. In most
cases, ceramic-matrix nanocomposites encompass a metal as an extra
reinforcing component. Ideally both components, the metallic one and the
ceramic one, are finely dispersed in each other in order to elicit the particular
nanoscopic properties. Nanocomposites from these combinations were
demonstrated in improving their optical, electrical and magnetic properties
(F. E Kruis, 1998) as well as tribological, corrosion-resistance and other
protective properties.
9
Fig.2 Ceramic material incorporating Nano-fillers
3) Polymer-matrix nanocomposite: This is the simplest case; just by
appropriately adding nanoparticles to a polymer matrix, the performance can
be enhanced, often dramatically, by simply capitalizing on the nature and
properties of the nanoscale filler (these materials are better described by the
term nano-filled polymer composites). The reinforcing material can be made
up of particles (e.g. minerals), sheets (e.g. exfoliated clay stacks) or fibres
(e.g. carbon nanotubes or electro-spun fibres). This strategy is particularly
effective in yielding high performance composites, when good dispersion of
the filler is achieved and the properties of the nanoscale filler are
substantially different or better than those of the polymer matrix.
10
Nanoparticles such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, molybdenum disulfide
and tungsten disulfide are being used as reinforcing agents to fabricate
mechanically strong biodegradable polymeric nanocomposites for bone
tissue engineering applications.
1.1 POLYMER/CLAY COMPOSITES
Polymer-clay nanocomposites are formed through the union of two different
materials with organic and mineral pedigrees (origin). This hybrid composition
however exhibit large increases in tensile strength, modulus, and heat distortion
temperature as compared to pristine polymer (polymer in its purest form).
Fig.3 Polymer Matrix Incorporating Nano-sheets
11
2.0 SYNTHESIS
The most popularly used filler material is based on the smectite class of aluminum
silicate clays, of which the most common representative is montmorillonite
(MMT). Other layered silicates in this same general family that can be used are;
hectorite, mica, talc, vermiculite, kaolinite, saponite (Bridley S. et al, 1980). The
MMT crystal structure is made up of a layer of aluminum hydroxide octahedral
sheet sandwiched between two layers of silicon oxide tetrahedral sheets (Fig. 1).
The nominal composition of MMT is Na1/3(Al5/3Mg1/3)Si4O10(OH)2. The layer
thickness of each platelet is on the order of 1 nm, and the lateral dimension is
approximately 200 nm (Pinnavaia T, 2000). These clay platelets are stacked on
each other and held together through van der Waal forces and are separated from
each other by 1 nm gaps (galleries). These galleries are usually occupied by
cations, normally alkali and alkaline-earth cations such as Na+ and K+, which
counterbalance the negative charges generated from isomorphic substitution within
the layers (for montmorillonite, Al3+ replaced by Mg2+).
12
Fig 1. Structure of 2:1 layered silicate showing two tetrahedral sheets of silicon oxide fused to anoctahedral sheet of aluminum hydroxide (Quang t. et al, 2006)
It is well established that main objective in preparing PLS nanocomposites is to
obtain exfoliation of the large stacks of silicate nanoplatelets into individual layers.
By analogy with polymer blends, the physical mixture of silicate layers and
polymer matrix may not form a nanocomposite due to the unmatched chemical
affinity between the two (based on their polarity). Thus, in order to have a
successful development of clay-based nanocomposites, it is necessary to
chemically modify a naturally hydrophilic silicate surface to an organophilic one
so that it can be compatible with a chosen polymer matrix. Generally, this can be
done through ion exchange reactions by replacing interlayer cations with
13
quarternary alkylammonium or alkylphosphonium cations (Fig. 4). Ion-exchange
reactions with cationic surfactants such as the ones mentioned above render the
normally hydrophilic silicate surface organophilic, thus making it more compatible
with non-polar polymers. These cationic surfactants modify interlayer interactions
by lowering the surface energy of the inorganic component and improve the
wetting characteristics with the polymer. Furthermore, they can provide functional
groups that can react with the polymer or initiate polymerization of monomers and
thereby improve the strength of the interface between the polymer and inorganic
component.
Fig.5 Schematic representation of a cation-exchange reaction between the silicate and an
alkylammonium salt (after Zanetti et al, 2000).
14
Complete dispersion of clay platelets in a monomer or polymer matrix involves
three steps, such as;
I. Wetting the surface of clay platelets by monomer or polymer
molecules,
II. Intercalation of the monomer into the clay galleries, and
III. Exfoliation of clay layers.
In polymer nanocomposites, the following routes can be taken to incorporate clay
into the polymer matrix at nanolevel. They are;
2.1 Solution Induced Intercalation Method: This involves the solubilizing of
polymer in an organic solvent, then the clay is dispersed in the obtained solution
and subsequently either the solvent is evaporated or the polymer precipitated. This
approach leads to poor clay dispersion, besides other problem like: high costs of
solvents required, large amount of solvent needs to be used to achieve appreciable
filler dispersion, technical phase separation problem, and health and safety
problem. Solvent route technique is used in the case of water-soluble polymers for
clear reasons.
2.2 In situ intercalative polymerization: Using this technique, polymer formation
can occur in between the intercalated sheets. In situ polymerization is based on the
following procedure:
15
I. Swelling of the layered silicate within the liquid monomer and the
polymerization can be initiated either by heat or radiation.
II. By the diffusion of a suitable initiator, or by an organic initiator.
This approach has been successfully applied in manufacturing of nylon–6-
montmorrillonite nanocomposite, and later it was extended to other thermoplastics.
This is a convenient method for thermoset– clay nanocomposites.
3.3 Melt Intercalation: In this technique, no solvent is required and the layered
silicate is mixed within the polymer matrix in the molten state. A thermoplastic
polymer is mechanically mixed by conventional methods such as extrusion and
injection molding with organophillic clay at an elevated temperature. The polymer
chains are then intercalated or exfoliated to form nanocomposites. This is a popular
method for preparing thermoplastic nanocomposites. The polymers, which are not
suitable for adsorption or in situ polymerization, can be processed using this
technique (Ray, S.S. et al, 2003)
2.4 Structure of Polymer/Clay Nano Composites
In general, the degree of dispersion of the clay platelets into the polymer matrix
determines the structure of nanocomposites. Depending on the interaction between
the clay and the polymer matrix, two main idealized types of polymer–clay
16
morphologies can be obtained. Namely; intercalated and exfoliated (Fig. 6). The
intercalated structure results from penetration of a single polymer chain into the
galleries between the silicate layers, resulting in formation of alternate layers of
polymer and inorganic layers. An exfoliated structure results when the individual
silicate layers are completely separated and dispersed randomly in a polymer
matrix. Usually exfoliated nanocomposites are preferred because they provide the
best property improvements (Masnelli-varlot K. et al, 2002). Since the remarkable
improvements in the material properties in a nylon-6/clay nanocomposite
demonstrated by the research group (Okada A, 1998) numerous other polymers
have been investigated by many researchers around the world. These include, but
are not limited to, polypropylene, polyethylene, polystyrene poly (ethylene oxide),
polycaprolactone, polyimides, polyamide, poly (ethyleneterephthalate),
polycarbonate, polyurethane, and epoxy resins (Lan T. et al, 1995). Often, a
nanocomposite may not be intercalated or exfoliated in structure but a combination
of both where the polymer is unable to intercalate between the silicate sheets and a
phase separated composite is obtained.
17
Fig.6 Schematic illustrations of two types of polymer-layered silicate morphologies: (left) intercalated
and (right) exfoliated (Quang t. et al, 2006).
The complete dispersion of clay particle into the polymer micronsize matrices is
possible because of their nanosizes and this allows their dispersion throughout the
polymeric resin. In developing and optimizing nanocomposites, one needs to know
the degree of exfoliation of a particular sample and compare it to other samples.
The dispersion of clay in the polymer matrix to form intercalated or exfoliated is
often investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) techniques. The nanocomposite structure, namely, intercalated
or exfoliated, may be identified by monitoring the position, shape, and intensity of
the basal reflections from the distributed silicate layers. XRD can offer a
convenient method to determine the interlayer spacing of the silicate layers in the
original layered silicates and in the formed polymer-clay nanocomposites, but not
much can be concluded about the spatial distribution of the silicate layers in the
18
matrix of the polymer composite (Yalcin B. et al, 2004). In addition, because some
layered silicates actually do not exhibit well-defined basal reflections, their
structures are very difficult to study systematically. Thus, conclusions based solely
on XRD patterns are only tentative when concerning the mechanism of
nanocomposite formation and their structure. To supplement the deficiencies of
XRD, TEM can be used. TEM allows a qualitative understanding of the internal
structure, spatial distribution of the various phases, and views of the defect
structure through direct visualization (Wang, Z. et al 1998). Together, TEM and
XRD are essential tools for evaluating nanocomposite structure. TEM is time
consuming and gives qualitative information on selected regions of the sample,
whereas low-angle peaks in XRD allow quantification of changes in layer spacing.
Occasionally, small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) can also be used to characterize
the structure of nanocomposites. SAXS is useful when layer spacing exceed 6–7
nm in intercalated nanocomposites or when the layers become relatively disordered
in exfoliated nanocomposites. Recently, it was discovered that simultaneous SAXS
and WAXD studies yielded quantitative characterization of nanostructure and
crystallite structure in nylon-6 based nanocomposites.
19
Fig. 7. Transmission electron microscopy of a melt-intercalated organoclay tactoid in a
PP matrix. Courtesy of Dr M. Bacia, UST Lille.
20
3.0 PROPERTIES OF POLYMER/CLAY NANO COMPOSITES,
RELEVANCE AND APPLICATION
1. Mechanical Behaviour: Being able to improve strength and stiffness with
limited alteration of toughness is a goal readily achievable with polymer–
clay nanocomposites. The first commercial example of polymeric
nanocomposites in automotive applications was clay–nylon-6
nanocomposites used for making timing belt covers (the Toyota Motor
Company, 1991). The creep and fatigue properties of polymer
nanocomposites have drastically led to the overall improvement of the
mechanical performance of automobiles.
Fig 8. Nanocomposites application for automotive parts [Mehdi Hojjati et al, 2006]
2. Ballistic performance: This is an important issue for the survivability and
damage tolerance studies for aerospace and automotive structures. Polymer-
clay Nanocomposites have been studied and seen to have ability to maintain
a course through the air determined by its initial orientation and engine
21
thrust. The US Army research laboratory investigated the ballistic impact
strength of polycarbonate-layered silicate nanocomposites. Boeing, USA
demonstrated the potential for aerospace application in a workshop in 2004
in FL, USA. According to their description, nanocomposites can play an
important role in longer-range missiles and a greater payload for aircraft.
3. Fire-Retardant Behaviour: Controlling polymer flammability remains a
key issue in numerous applications of engineering plastics and commodity.
The fire-retardant additive approach provides cost-effective solutions, but
generally at the expenses of some physical and mechanical properties. There
is also growing pressure for environmentally safe products and processes,
including recyclability and use of halogen-free compounds. For these
reasons, recognition of improved flammability properties in the case of
polymer–clay nanocomposites has triggered the development of extensive
research programs on a large variety of materials.
Koo and Pilato investigated the polymer nanocomposite for high-
temperature applications using cyanate ester, epoxy, phenolic, nylon 11, etc.
and described the feasibility of using these materials for fire retardant
coatings, rocket propulsion insulation, rocket nozzle ablative materials,
damage tolerant performance, etc. Ablatives are required to protect
aerospace launching systems against solid rocket exhaust plumes (3600oC)
22
at very high velocity. They demonstrated that nanoclay plays a key role in
reducing the flammability on coating systems. Flammability is another
important issue for many applications. Other studies show that
nanocomposites prepared from the nylon family, epoxy, polystyrene or vinyl
ester, exhibit reduced flammability compared to their pure polymers.
Cone calorimetry is used to evaluate the flammability under fire-like
conditions. Relevant parameters such as the heat release rate (HRR) and its
peak value, heat of combustion (Hc), smoke yield (specific extension area,
SEA), and carbon monoxide yield are obtained. The table below shows some
typical data for layered silicate nanocomposites based on organically treated
montmorillonite, with polyamide 6, poly(propylene-graft-maleic anhydride),
and polystyrene as the host matrix. Nanocomposites under investigation
have a substantial reduction in peak HRR value (50–75%), whereas Hc and
CO formation shows little variation.
The table also compares the PS–clay nanocomposite with a PS–clay mix for
which intercalation does not occur. The peak HRR value remains identical to
that of pure PS while the intercalated PS–clay nanocomposite shows a 50%
reduction.
Peak HRR, kW/m2 MeanHRR,kW/m2
Mean Hc,MJ/kg
Total heatreleased,MJ/kg
MeanSEA,m2/kg
Nylon-6 1011 603 27 413 197
Nylon-6–clay 2% 686 390 27 406 271
23
delaminated
Nylon-6–clay 5%Delaminated
378 304 27 397 296
PS 1118 703 29 102 1464
PS–clay mix 3%immiscible
1080 715 29 96 1836
PS–clay 3%intercalated
567 444 27 89 1727
PP-g-MA 2028 861 38 219 756
PP-g-MA–clay 5%intercalated
922 651 37 179 994
4. Barrier Properties: Organically modified clays dispersed in a nylon-6–
polymer matrix greatly improved the dimensional stability and the barrier
properties. Improvement in barrier resistance in nanocomposites plays an
important role in beverage applications. When the layers are laminated, it
increases the effective path length for molecular diffusion and the path
becomes highly tortuous to reduce the effect of gas and moisture
transmission through the film. Based on this barrier properties,
nanocomposite packaging films made in polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
have been studied as replacements for conventional polymer films. The
example of polyimide clay films illustrates the dramatic decrease of
permeability coefficients. Only 2 mass% montmorillonite loading reduces
the permeability by more than 50% of the pure polymer value for water
vapour, oxygen, or helium. Notwithstanding possible changes in diffusion
and/or solubility (Gao, F, 2004). It has been postulated that the major role of
24
the clay platelets consists in substantially increasing the path length of the
permeant, which is by creating a highly tortuous path, due to the high aspect
ratio of the clay.
A simple theory derived by Nielsen expresses the relative permeability as
follows:
Pc/Po =1/ [1+ (L/2W) Vf]
In which Vf is the volume fraction of plates, L is the plate length, and W is
the thickness. Pc and Po stand for the nanocomposite and polymer
permeability respectively. Using equivalent loadings of clay but varying the
aspect ratio yields results in fairly good agreement with the theoretical
prediction. In the same way, a significant reduction in water vapor
permeability was observed in the case of a poly(ε-caprolactone) – organo-
montmorillonite nanocomposite, showing a fivefold reduction at only 4.8
vol% clay whereas it is only halved at best with a 20 vol% conventionally
filled silicate composite.
5. Biodegradability: Another interesting aspect of nanocomposite technology
is the significant improvements of biodegradability of biodegradable
polymers after nanocomposite preparation with organoclay (Mohanty, A.K.
et al, 2003). TOYOTA Technological Institute is commercializing layered
25
silicate nanocomposites for packaging materials and also for short-term
disposable applications.
6. Thermal Stability: In recent years, thermogravimetric analysis of various
polymer–clay systems has confirmed this observation even for low
nanofiller loadings. One striking example is that of cross-linked
poly(dimethylsiloxane) incorporating 10 mass% exfoliated organo-
montmorillonite for which thermal stability under nitrogen flow is enhanced
by 140oC. For space applications, some critical issues are important, such as
temperature extremes of 196 to 125oC, higher toughness, dimensional
stability (i.e., resistance to micro cracking), etc. thus the science of polymer-
clay nanocomposites will be of optimum usefulness in space application
having fulfilled this degree of thermal stability.
26
CONCLUSION
It has become apparent that nanoscale reinforcement is an attractive way of
improving the properties and stability of polymers. The development of
Polymer/Clay Nanocomposites is now a rapidly expanding multidisciplinary global
research activity. The nanoscale and high specific surface area of nanofillers
(which exhibit at least one dimension in the range of 1-100nm, such as
nanoparticles) and the resulting predominance of interfaces in PCNCs significantly
affect the structure and morphology of PCNCs at the molecular scale, influencing
their physical and material properties at scales that are inaccessible when
traditional (e.g. micron-sized) filler materials are used. The resulting PNCs exhibit
an excellent property profile that is applicable to a wide variety of industrial
applications; for example, high stiffness, chemical and thermal resistance,
dimensional stability, reduced water absorption, as well as improved electrical and
optical properties, all of which are significantly different from those provided by
conventional composites.
27
REFERENCE
Blanton T.N, M. D. (2000). Microstructure of clay-polymer composites.
international center for diffraction data 2000, 42, 562-568.
Gao, F. (2004). Clay/Polymer Composites: the Story. Materials Today, 7(11): 50–
55.
Lan, T. (2007). Polymer-clay Nanocomposites- better plastics. P2 Through
Nanotechnology (pp. 1-33). USA: Nanocor.
Mangala Joshi, K. B. (2006, march). Polymer/clay nanocomposite based coating
for enhanced gas barier property. Indian journal of fibre and textile
research, 31, 202-214.
Quang T. Nguyen, D. G. (2006). Preparation of polymer-clay nanocomposites and
their properties. Advances in polymer technology, 271-277.
Ray S.S, Okamoto M. (2003). Polymer/layered Silicate Nanocomposite: A Review
from Preparation to Processing, Prog. Polymer Sci., 28: 1539–1641.
Schulz M.J, Kelker A.D. and Sunderasen M.J. (2005). Nanoengineering of
Structural, Functional, and Smart Materials, (ed.), 1st edn., CRC Taylor &
Francis, USA, ISBN 0849316537; Chapter 17.