ESSAY TITLE:What are the main facets of Lukan Pneumatology, and how do they compare with those of Pauline Pneumatology?
Contents
............................................................................................Introduction 2
.....................................................................The Holy Spirit and Jesus 4
........................................................................................Luke’s View 4
..........................................................................Jesus the Messiah 4
............................................................Jesus the Child of the Spirit 5
...................................................Jesus the Possessor of the Spirit 5
...........................................................Jesus the Giver of the Spirit 6
.........................................................................................Paul’s View 7
...........................................The Holy Spirit and the Spirit of Jesus 7
............................................................................................Summary 8
.......................................................................The Gift of the Holy Spirit 8
........................................................................................Luke’s View 8
.....................................................Who gives the Gift of the Spirit? 8
..........................................When is the Gift of the Spirit received? 9
..........................................What is the Gift of the Holy Spirit for? 11
.......................................................................................Paul’s View 12
...................................................Who gives the Gift of the Spirit? 12
........................................When is the Gift of the Spirit received? 12
..........................................What is the Gift of the Holy Spirit for? 13
..........................................................................................Summary 14
......................................................The Holy Spirit and the End Times 16
......................................................................................Luke’s View 16
.......................................................................................Paul’s View 18
..........................................................................................Summary 20
...........................................................................................Conclusion 20
.........................................................................................Bibliography 21
Vsn 3.0, 24/03/07
Introduction
“The health of the contemporary church necessitates that its theology
of the Spirit and its experience of the Spirit correspond more closely”.1
Historically Paul has been considered to be the theologian while Luke was
classified as the historian who recorded the experiences of the early church.2
In this paper, I will attempt to bring the theology and experience of the Spirit
closer together by examining the main facets of Lukan Pneumatology and
comparing them with those of the apostle Paul.
Pneumatology is a broad subject and so I will restrict this study to how
the Holy Spirit, in the writings of Luke and Paul, relates Christologically,
Charismatically and Eschatologically.3 The secondary sources I shall employ
in this study are mainly the writings of Roger Stronstad4, Robert Menzies5,
James Dunn and Gordon Fee. I have chosen these four because Stronstad
and Menzies have a bias towards the Christian having a full experience of the
Spirit and Dunn and Fee towards forming a correct theology of the Spirit.
Luke has typically been read through the eyes of Paul.6 This is
because Paul is upheld as the theologian7, while Luke is the observer, the
Page 2 of 22
1 Gordon D. Fee, God’s Empowering Presence: the Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul (Hendrickson Publishers; Massachusetts, 1994), p. 02.
2 James D. G. Dunn, The Christ and the Spirit: Volume 2 Pneumatology (Eardmans Publishing Company; Grand Rapids, Michigan 1998), p. 09
3 Regarding Lukan authorship, I will assume the traditional view that Luke wrote Luke-Acts. As to Pauline authorship I will restrict this study to the six uncontested Pauline epistles viz. Romans, 1 & 2 Corinthians, Galatians and 1 & 2 Thessalonians.
4 Roger Stronstad, The Charismatic Theology of St. Luke (Hendrickson Publishers; Massachusetts, 1984)
5 William W. Menzies; Robert P. Menzies, Spirit and Power; Foundations of Pentecostal Experience (Zondervan; Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2000)
6 Roger Stronstad, ‘Unity and Diversity’, Enrichment Journal. (2006), <http://enrichmentjournal.ag.org/top/Holy_Spirit/200612.cfm>, [accessed 8/12/08]
7 Dunn says that out of all the writers of the New Testament Paul is the one who most deserves the title ‘Theologian of the Spirit’. See Dunn, Christ, p. 12.
historian who is not given much recognition as a theologian8. I believe,
however, that Luke has something to offer the church both experientially and
theologically. As Stronstad observes, “Typically, Luke’s data is pressed into
the Pauline mould. (Yet Luke is an independent witness and contributes to the
diversity as well as to the unity of the New Testament pneumatology.)”9
Menzies backs this up by saying that Luke did record history but “he had a
theological purpose in view”.10 It would therefore not be incorrect to read
Luke’s work with the understanding that he is using a narrative style in order
to teach doctrine. 2 Tim. 3:16 says “All scripture is inspired by God and is
useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in
righteousness”.11 Luke-Acts fits into the category of ‘all scripture’ and should
therefore be useful for teaching.
Luke borrows style, terminology and themes from the Septuagint.12
Luke-Acts13 fits into the historical narrative genre as does the history of Israel,
as recorded in the Septuagint. Luke uses terminology from the Septuagint to
describe his theology of the Holy Spirit. He not only uses terms that are
unique in the New Testament but he also does not use the terminology that
Paul uses for example “fruit of the spirit”. This means that when it comes to
interpreting phrases such as “filled with the Holy Spirit”, we need to
understand that it means the same in Luke’s gospel as it does in Acts and that
we need to look to the Old Testament, and not to Paul’s epistles, for Luke’s
intended meaning.14
Page 3 of 22
8 Gordon D. Fee, How to read the Bible for all its worth: A guide to understanding the Bible, (Zondervan; Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1982) p. 97.
9 Roger Stronstad, ‘Unity’
10 Menzies, Spirit, p. 50.
11 All Scripture quotations taken from The Holy Bible : New Revised Standard Version. (Thomas Nelson Publishers: Nashville, 1989)
12 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 13.Craig S. Keener, ‘Why Does Luke Use Tongues as a Sign of the Spirit’s
Empowerment’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 15.2, (2007), p.180.
13 Acts is not a separate book. It is the second part of a two-volume work. See I. Howard Marshall, Acts (Inter-Varsity Press; Leicester, England, 1980), pp. 18,19.
14 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 12.
Paul’s theology also leans on the Old Testament, but from a Rabbinical
point of view (Gal. 1:13,14; Phil. 3:5). The significance of this is seen in the
fact that the Rabbis believed that the Holy Spirit could only be experienced in
a community and at the appropriate time. Therefore, Paul’s teachings
emphasise that the gifts are for the edification of the body and that the coming
of the Spirit signals the beginning of the end time.15
The theologies of the Holy Spirit therefore, of Luke and Paul, are not
contradictory. As Pinnock points out:
The theologies of Luke and Paul are complementary to each other but must not be confused as being identical in the usual way. Paul has room, of course, for what Luke says in his treatment of the charismatic structure of the congregation in 1 Corinthians 12-14, but Luke must not be imprisoned in one room of the Pauline house.16
Let’s explore then how the pneumatologies of Luke and Paul
complement one another.
The Holy Spirit and Jesus
Luke’s View
Jesus the Messiah
In his writings, Luke shows that the Holy Spirit and Jesus had a unique
relationship. This point is stressed by the activity of the Holy Spirit in the
events surrounding Jesus’ birth. Luke is the only gospel writer who records
that:• John will be filled with the Holy Spirit before his birth (1:15)• John’s ministry will be done in the power of the spirit (1:17)• Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit (1:41)• Zechariah was filled with the Holy Spirit (1:67)
Page 4 of 22
15 Stronstad, ‘Unity’.
16 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. vii.
• Simeon prophesied under the anointing of the Holy Spirit
(2:25-27)
The significance of these accounts is realised in their historical context viz.
they occur after 400 years of complete silence and inactivity of the Spirit of
God. It is also important to note that in every instance mentioned, the filling of
the Spirit was accompanied by prophecy. Stronstad points out that by making
these unique references to the role the Holy Spirit played in the birth of Jesus,
Luke was intent on showing firstly, that Jesus fulfilled the intertestamental
Messianic expectation and secondly, that the Holy Spirit empowers for a
purpose (Luke 2:29-32).
Jesus the Child of the Spirit
From conception to his resurrection, Luke shows Jesus to be the Anointed
One. Using terminology reminiscent of the Septuagint, he shows that Jesus
was conceived of the Holy Spirit as the Holy Spirit overshadowed Mary (Luke
1:35). Dunn comments on the miraculous conception,
The thought here is not that of the divine presence becoming Jesus or being embodied in Jesus; Luke’s intention is clearly to describe the creative process of begetting, not that which was begotten.17
Therefore, Jesus is not the Spirit who has become flesh, but rather, the one
who has the Spirit upon him. He is the one about whom Isaiah prophesied:
Is. 42:1 Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen, in whom my soul delights; I have put my spirit upon him; he will bring forth justice to the nations.
In emphasising the Holy Spirit’s role in the birth of Jesus, Luke shows Jesus
to be the unique child of the Spirit.
Jesus the Possessor of the Spirit
At his baptism, Jesus becomes the unique possessor of the Holy Spirit.
While the other gospel writers record that the Holy Spirit came down on Jesus
Page 5 of 22
17 Dunn, Christ, p. 76.
“like a dove”, Luke adds that the Spirit descended on Jesus “like a dove in
bodily form” (Matt. 3:16, Mark 1:10, John 1:32, Luke 3:22). This emphasis
shows that this was an actual physical manifestation of the Holy Spirit and not
merely a visionary experience.18
Jesus understood this event to be the anointing for his ministry. In Luke
4:18,19 he says,
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free to proclaim the year of the Lord’s favour.” In 4:22 Jesus further explains that he sees his ministry as that of a
prophet. Stronstad elaborates on this to say that Luke was emphasising that
Jesus saw himself as fulfilling the prophetic ministry.19
Jesus is therefore the Messiah, the Anointed One, a prophet led and
empowered by the Spirit.20
Jesus the Giver of the Spirit
In his gospel Luke portrays Jesus as the unique possessor of the Spirit.
However, in Acts, Jesus becomes the giver of the Spirit. On the day of
Pentecost Peter explains in his sermon that Jesus is the one who has poured
out the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:33).
Jesus was anointed and empowered for his ministry when the Holy
Spirit came upon him. So too, his disciples are anointed and empowered for
their mission when the Holy Spirit came upon them on the day of Pentecost.
Page 6 of 22
18 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 40.
19 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 42.
20 Stronstad, ‘Unity’.
Stronstad says that after Pentecost “the Holy Spirit becomes the alter
ego of Jesus” because the disciples now continue with the mission of Jesus,
empowered and led by the Spirit of Jesus (Acts 16:7).21
Paul’s View
The Holy Spirit and the Spirit of Jesus
Paul’s writings are circumstantial and not historical.22 He, therefore,
does not record the birth or ministry of Jesus. His first chronological mention
of the Holy Spirit relating to Christ is in his resurrection (Rom. 1:4). Fee points
out that this passage shows that even though the Spirit is closely related to
the Son they are distinct.23
It is however, difficult to find the line of distinction because the Spirit of
God is called the Spirit of Christ (Rom. 8:9) and the Spirit of his Son (Gal.
4:6). Dunn explains it like this, ‘the Spirit is now the medium by which Christ is
known to and united with his followers’.24 Therefore, the only way that the
believer can relate to Christ is by relating to the Spirit.
Fee’s explains Rom. 8:9 by saying that the emphasis is placed on what
is means to be a believer, and that is ‘to have the Spirit of Christ’.25 In Paul’s
thinking the Christian life began when one received the Spirit. (Gal. 3:2-3)
Christ is central in Paul’s pneumatology and likewise, the Spirit is
essential to his Christology. Without the Spirit, one cannot belong to Christ.
We are joined to Christ by the Spirit (1 Cor. 6:17). It is by the gift of the Spirit
Page 7 of 22
21 Stronstad, ‘Unity’.
22 Stronstad, ‘Unity’.
23 This passage does not show that the Spirit is the agent of Christ’s resurrection. Rather, Paul is stating that if the Spirit of him (God) who raised Christ from the dead dwells within us, then we can be assured of our own future. See Fee, Empowering, pp.808, 809
24 Dunn, Christ, p. 339.
25 Fee, Empowering, p. 548.
that we are adopted as sons of God (Rom 8:14-16).26 Everything that the
Spirit does is for Christ.
The overriding theme therefore, in Paul’s understanding of how the
Holy Spirit relates to Jesus has to do with salvation.
Summary
Luke and Paul have different emphases with regards to how the Holy
Spirit relates Christologically. Luke shows that Jesus is the promised Messiah
who is anointed by the Spirit to perform his ministry. Paul emphasises that the
Holy Spirit is the key agent in a person’s salvation and subsequent
relationship with Christ.
The Gift of the Holy Spirit27
The main issues of concern regarding the way the Holy Spirit relates
Charismatically are:• Who gives the gift of the Spirit?• When is the gift of the Spirit received?• What is the gift of the Holy Spirit for?
Luke’s View
Who gives the Gift of the Spirit?
It is clear that Luke understands Jesus to be the giver of the Spirit. We
see this in the following verses:• Luke 3:16 John the Baptist declares that Jesus will baptise in
the Holy Spirit.
Page 8 of 22
26 Dunn, Christ, p. 13.
27 By way of definition, when referring to the ‘gift of the Holy Spirit’ I am not talking about ‘gifts of the Spirit’, but rather ‘the Holy Spirit who was given’. (Luke 24:49; 2 Cor. 5:5)
• Luke 24:49 Jesus promises to send to his disciples what the
Father promised viz. the gift of the Holy Spirit.• Acts 1:4,5 Jesus again refers to the ‘promise of the Father’ but
links it to John the Baptist’s prophecy. This implies that he sees
himself as the giver of the Holy Spirit.• Acts 2:33 Peter explains the Pentecost phenomena as Jesus
pouring out the Holy Spirit, which was promised by the Father.
Why did Luke make this emphasis? Marshall answers this question by
saying that it gives further proof that Jesus is the Messiah.28 I believe,
however that there is more to it than this. Stronstad explains the importance of
the transfer motif in Luke’s thinking.29 He points out that when there was a
transfer of the Spirit in the Old Testament, there was also a transfer of
leadership. We see the Spirit being transferred from Moses to the Elders
(Num. 11:25), from Elijah to Elisha (2 Kings 2:9,10) and also from Saul to
David (1 Sam. 16:13,14). What this means is that at Pentecost the disciples
were given not only the Spirit but also the ministry of Jesus. The disciples
were to continue to do the works that Jesus did and teach the things that he
taught.
When is the Gift of the Spirit received?
There has been a lot of debate surrounding this question. This is
because Pentecostals believe that Luke teaches that the Baptism of the Spirit
is a secondary experience subsequent to salvation while Evangelicals
believe that he teaches that the Spirit is received at salvation.30
Page 9 of 22
28 Marshall, Acts, p. 79.
29 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 20.
30 Menzies and Stronstad take the Pentecostal position and Dunn and Turner fly the Evangelical flag. See Menzies, Spirit, pp. 69-106., Stronstad, Charismatic, pp. 49-62, Dunn, Baptism, pp.222-242, Max Turner, ‘The Work of the Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts’ Word & World 23.2 (2003).
Fee seems to agree with the Pentecostal viewpoint. See Fee, How to Read, p.96.
There is one point on which Dunn, Menzies and Stronstad agree viz.
that when we interpret books of the Bible we need to examine the works of
each author separately.31 In other words, we need to allow Luke to be Luke
and Paul to be Paul. Let us then see what Luke says about the timing of the
reception of the Spirit:• Acts 1:4,5 Jesus tells his disciples that they will soon be
baptised in the Holy Spirit.• Acts 2:1-4 All of the disciples were baptised in the Holy Spirit
and they began to speak in other tongues.• Acts 8:14-17 Peter and John were sent to a group of Samaritans
who had already accepted the word of God. When Peter and
John laid hands on them, they received the Holy Spirit.• Acts 19:1-6 At Ephesus Paul meets some disciples who had not
even heard of the Holy Spirit. He lays hands on them and they
begin to speak in tongues.
There are two important points to take note of regarding the above events.
Firstly, throughout Acts, Luke associates speaking in tongues with the
Baptism of the Spirit. There are occasions where tongues are not specifically
mentioned namely Acts 8:14-17 but there is always a sign of some kind. This
is consistent with Luke’s Old Testament pneumatology.32 This helps us to
identify when the people have been given the gift of the Spirit. Secondly, Luke
always uses the term ‘disciple’ to refer to disciples of Jesus.33 This means that
in all the above examples, those who received the gift of the Spirit were
already Christians.
Page 10 of 22
31 James D. G. Dunn, Baptism in the Holy Spirit (London: SCM, 1970), p. 39.; Menzies, Spirit, p. 51.; Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 10.
32 Stronstad, Charismatic, pp. 21-22.
33 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 90.
As far as Luke is concerned then, it is always believers who receive the
Baptism of the Holy Spirit. Therefore, the book of Acts does not teach a
salvation reception of the Spirit.35
What is the Gift of the Holy Spirit for?
When it comes to understanding the purpose for the Baptism of the
Holy Spirit, the key verse is Luke 4:18. Here Jesus interprets what happened
to him when he was baptised by saying “The Holy Spirit is upon me
because…” Jesus was anointed for a purpose, his mission. Stronstad shows
that Luke deliberately parallels the events on the day of Pentecost with those
of Jesus’ baptism in order to show that what the anointing meant to Jesus, the
Baptism of the Spirit means to his disciples.35
Jesus prepared his disciples for their mission by telling them to wait for
an empowerment from ‘on high’. (Luke 24:49) He also explained what the
purpose of this empowerment would be in Acts 1:8.
But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.
The Acts 2 account of Pentecost is not the start of the Christian church.
It is rather, the launch of the church’s mission.36 In the words of de Kock,
“Pentecostal power is for a Pentecostal task”.37 Jesus empowered his
disciples to take the gospel to the ends of the earth. Keener emphasises the
importance of this missionary call by pointing out that the disciples were
empowered for cross-cultural ministry by receiving the gift of tongues.38 They
Page 11 of 22
34 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 64.
35 Stronstad, Charismatic, pp. 51-52.
36 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 62.
37 Wynand J. de Kock, ‘Pentecostal Power For A Pentecostal Task: Empowerment Through Engagement In South African Context’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 16 (2000) pp. 102-116.
38 Craig S. Keener, ‘Why Does Luke Use Tongues as a Sign of the Spirit’s Empowerment’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 15.2, (2007)
were supernaturally able to proclaim the glory of God in the languages of the
people present.
We can conclude therefore that Luke saw the gift of the Holy Spirit as
missiological and not soteriological.
Paul’s View
Who gives the Gift of the Spirit?
Paul never refers to Jesus as being the giver of the Spirit.39 In 1 Cor.
2:12; 2 Cor. 1:21-22; 5:5; Gal. 3:5; 4:6 and 1 Thess. 4:8, God is shown to be
one who gives his Spirit. Fee explains that Paul uses this terminology to direct
attention to the work of the Father.40 It is important to note then, that in
context, all the above passages refer to God the Father working out his
redemptive plan.
The soteriological nature of Paul’s pneumatology is therefore brought
to the fore by his reference to God being the giver of the Spirit.
When is the Gift of the Spirit received?
The only mention Paul makes of a Baptism of the Spirit is in 1 Cor.
12:13 ‘For in the one Spirit we were all baptised into one body—Jews or
Greeks, slaves or free—and we were all made to drink of one Spirit.’ Here
Paul writes not only of baptism in Spirit but of being baptised in one Spirit into
one body. Dunn explains that this baptism means that the convert not only
experiences the Spirit but also ‘becomes a member of Christ’.41
This means that one receives the Spirit at salvation. This is confirmed
by what Paul says to the Galatians. In Gal 2:3, they received the Spirit when
Page 12 of 22
39 Dunn, Christ, p. 77., Fee, Empowering, pg. 835.
40 Fee, Empowering, p. 836.
41 Dunn, Christ, p. 114.
they believed and in Gal. 2:4 they began ‘in the Spirit’. Dunn says that Paul’s
language here clearly implies that the Galatians received the Spirit at
salvation.42
Fee agrees that the Spirit is received at salvation. He stresses
however, that this reception does not take place at baptism.43 Using 1 Cor.
1:13-17, Fee explains that the Spirit is received when the preaching of the
gospel is received with faith.44
What is the Gift of the Holy Spirit for?
Paul uses a number of soteriological metaphors to explain the work of
the Holy Spirit. The metaphor of adoption is used in Gal. 4:4-6. It is the Spirit
who makes believers children of God and the evidence of this adoption is the
cry ‘Abba, Father’.45 In 1 Cor. 6:11 ‘washing’ is used as a metaphor to
describe the cleansing work of the Spirit in the life of a believer. Paul also
refers back to the Jewish rituals, where the sacred utensils were sanctified
unto God, to describe how the believer is also sanctified unto God.46 (2 Thess.
2:13; Rom 15:16)
Paul also uses three other metaphors which bring in an eschatological
dimension to the believer’s salvation. He writes of the Spirit being a ‘down
payment’ guaranteeing that the believer will receive what God has promised
(2 Cor. 1:21-22; 5:5; Eph. 1:14). The metaphors of ‘firstfruits’ (Rom. 8:23) and
‘seal’ (2 Cor. 1:21-22; Eph 1:13; 4:30) carry a similar meaning to that of ‘down
payment’.
Page 13 of 22
42 Dunn, Christ, pp. 114,115.
43 Fee, Empowering, p. 862.
44 Fee, Empowering, p. 862.
45 Fee, Empowering, p. 856.
46 Fee, Empowering, p. 859.
The Spirit also enables us to not walk according to the flesh (Gal
5:16-17). Fee points out that ‘Nowhere does Paul describe life in the Spirit as
one of constant struggle with the flesh’. He says that in these verses, Paul
emphasising the sufficiency of the Spirit.47
Paul also teaches that the Holy Spirit is involved in the ongoing life of
the Christian:48
• Gal. 5:5; Rom. 15:13. The Spirit enables us to hope.• Col. 1:9; Rom. 12:1-2. The Spirit renews the mind.• Rom. 9:1 The Spirit keeps the believer’s conscience clear by
confirming the truth.• Gal. 5:22-23 The Spirit produces within the believer a lifestyle
which is contrary to that of the sinful nature.
From Paul’s perspective, the Holy Spirit is the key to Christian life. Instead of
giving Christians a list of rules to live by, God has given them his Spirit, who
transforms them into the image of his Son.49
The Holy Spirit not only empowers individual believers, but the body of
the church as well. He does this by giving gifts to believers, which are
intended for the edification of the church as a whole (1 Cor. 12:7-11; Rom.
12:6-7).
Fee summarises the purpose of the Gift of the Holy Spirit by saying
that life in the Spirit begins at conversion, but the experience of that life is both
dynamic and renewable.50
Summary
Page 14 of 22
47 Fee, Empowering, p. 817.
48 Fee, Empowering, p. 865.
49 Fee, Empowering, p. 879.
50 Fee, Empowering, p. 864.
Paul sees God as the giver of the Spirit. He understands that the Spirit
is received at conversion. From his epistles we learn that the Holy Spirit is
responsible not only for salvation, but also to transform the believers into the
likeness of Christ.
Luke on the other hand sees Jesus as being the giver of the Holy
Spirit. This gift is received, as a secondary experience from salvation and its
purpose is empowerment for mission.
While these emphases are different, they are not necessarily
contradictory. Dunn would argue otherwise. He says, with regard to when the
Spirit is received:
To recognise that ‘Baptised in the Spirit’ is a metaphor for ‘becoming a Christian’ would have prevented Pentecostalism from embarking on the theologically hazardous road of distinguishing baptism in Spirit from conversion.51
Menzies, however, does not necessarily see a contradiction. He points
out that Paul uses two Greek words to refer to the gifts given by the Spirit:
charismata (gifts) and pneumatika (spiritual gifts).52 He explains,
The way Paul alternates between pneumatika (1 Cor. 12:1; 14:1) and charismata (12:4; 12:31) in 1 Corinthians 12-14 suggests the former denotes a subcategory of the latter.53
Menzies’ point is that the subcategory of gifts which Paul refers to as
pneumatika is related to prophecy which in turn is related to the prophetic
gifting which is imparted at the Baptism of the Spirit as recorded in Luke-Acts.
Paul is therefore saying to the church in Corinth that every believer has gifts
(charismata), but there is a subcategory (pneumatika) of spiritual gifts that is
not automatically received at salvation. These prophetic gifts should be
eagerly desired. (1 Cor. 12:31; 14:1)54
Page 15 of 22
51 Dunn, Christ, p. 117.
52 Menzies, Spirit, p. 195.
53 Menzies, Spirit, p. 195.
54 Menzies, Spirit, pp. 195-197.
With this understanding we see that Luke and Paul do not contradict
one another. Luke has a very singular purpose for writing about the
charismatic nature of the Holy Spirit. Paul on the other hand is far more
detailed and is concerned about the salvation, the regeneration and the
empowerment of the believers.
The Holy Spirit and the End Times
Luke’s View
In Acts 1:6 the disciples asked the risen Christ if this was the time when
he would restore the kingdom to Israel. By asking this question they were
confirming two facts: Firstly that they believed that Jesus was the Messiah
and secondly, that the eschatological age was upon them. This belief was
based on their understanding of the Old Testament prophets.55
Stronstad shows how Luke paralleled the ministry of Jesus to that of
Elijah:56
• Luke 7:12-17 Like Elijah, Jesus raised the dead (1 Kings
17:17-24)• Luke 8:22-26 Like Elijah, Jesus controlled nature (1 Kings 17:1)• Luke 9:12-17 Like Elijah, Jesus multiplied food (1 Kings 17:16)• Act 2:4 Like Elijah, Jesus transferred an anointing of the Spirit to
his followers (2 Kings 2:13-14).
By making this comparison, Luke shows Jesus to be the expected end
time Elijah.
There were also other signs on the day of Pentecost that would have
convinced those gathered that the coming age was upon them.57 The violent
Page 16 of 22
55 Stronstad, Charismatic, pp. 24-26.
56 Stronstad, Charismatic, pp. 44-45.
57 Keener, Craig S., The Spirit in the Gospels and Acts. Divine Purity and Power. (Hendrickson Publishers; Massachusetts, 1997) p. 193.
wind from heaven (Acts 2:2) refers to the breath of life in Ezekiel 37. The
tongues of fire (Acts 2:3) symbolised the eschatological judgement.
Perhaps the clearest indication that the eschatological age had arrived
is Peter’s reference to Joel’s prophecy (Acts 2:16-21; Joel 2:28-32). In his
sermon, Peter declared that speaking in tongues was a confirmation of the
last day’s outpouring of the Spirit prophesied by Joel.
Menzies draws attention to the fact that in Acts 2:16-21, Luke has
made three changes to Joel’s prophecy:58
• He changes the order from ‘dreams and visions’ to ‘visions and
dreams’ (Acts 2:17 cf. Joel 2:28). This shows the importance of
receiving guidance from God in the form of visions.• In Acts 2:18 Luke adds the phrase ‘and they shall prophesy’.
Menzies says this describes the ministry that the end time
community of believers should expect to have. Like Jesus, the
ultimate prophet, the church too has a message to proclaim.59
• Joel speaks only of ‘portents (wonders) in the heaven and on
the earth’ (Joel 2:30). Luke adds ‘in the heavens above and
signs on the earth below’ (Acts 2:19). This connects with what
Peter said directly after quoting from Joel, that God attested
Jesus by signs and wonders. (Acts 2:22)
Menzies concludes that Luke was intent on showing that this is ‘an era
that is to be marked by divine guidance, bold witness, and signs and
wonders.’60 Jesus, the end time prophet, has transformed his followers into a
community of prophets and he has empowered them to take his message to
the ends of the earth.
Page 17 of 22
58 Robert P. Menzies, ‘Acts 2.17-21: A Paradigm for Pentecostal Mission’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 17 (2008), pp. 200-218.
59 Menzies, ‘Acts’.
60 Menzies, ‘Acts’.
As we look then, at how the Holy Spirit relates eschatologically, we
once again see Luke’s missiological bias coming to the fore.
Paul’s View
The eschatological dimension to the work of the Spirit is so important
that Fee says:
It is not possible to understand the Spirit in Pauline theology without recognising that for Paul the coming of the Spirit was God’s fulfilment of the promised new covenant.61
Along with the coming of the Spirit, the other event that led Paul to
believe that he was living in the end times was Christ’s resurrection.62 Paul
was convinced that he was living in the end times. He wrote to the Corinthians
and told them that they were those ‘on whom the ends of the ages have
come’. (1 Cor. 10:11)
Paul understood the end times to have begun with the resurrection of
Christ and the coming of the Spirit. However, the promises of God have not
yet been fully realised and so we are living in a time of tension. This tension
between the ‘already’ and the ‘not yet’ can be illustrated by looking at some of
God’s promises:63
• Salvation: o Eph. 2:8. We have already been saved. o 1 Cor. 1:18. We are being saved.
• Redemption:o Eph. 1:7. We have redemption.o Eph. 4:30. The Spirit seals us for the day of redemption.
• Adoption:o Rom. 8:15. We have received a spirit of sonship.o Rom. 8:23. We eagerly await our adoption as sons.
Page 18 of 22
61 Fee, Empowering, p. 13.
62 Fee, Empowering, p. 805.
63 Fee, Empowering, pp. 803-805.
• Justification:o Rom. 5:1. We have been justified.o Gal. 5:5. By the Spirit we await the righteousness for
which we hope.
Fee explains that the Holy Spirit is, for the believer, the proof that the
future has come into the present.64 Paul describes this role as the Holy Spirit
being the ‘down payment’ (2 Cor.1:21-22; 5:5; Eph. 1:14), the ‘firstfruits’ (Rom.
8:23) and the ‘seal’ (2 Cor. 1:21; Eph. 1:13; 4:30) of the believer’s redemption
and final resurrection. Therefore, the Holy Spirit is the fulfilment of God’s
promises and also the down payment of the believer’s certain future.65
Fee also brings out another aspect of Paul’s understanding of
eschatology and that is the inclusion of Gentiles into the people of God.66
Explaining Gal. 3:14 Fee says:
Paul’s assertion that the fulfilment of this promised blessing for the Gentiles is to be found in their having experienced the Spirit as a living and dynamic reality. The blessing of Abraham, therefore, is not simply ‘justification by faith.’ Rather, it refers to the eschatological life now available to Jew and Gentile alike, effected through the death of Christ, but realised through the dynamic ministry of the Spirit.67
In writing to Gentiles in Eph. 1:13,14 Paul assures them that they too
are sealed with the Holy Spirit. He then puts Jew and Gentile together by
adding that the Spirit is the guarantee of ‘our inheritance’. Paul sees this work
of the Spirit as the fulfilment of the eschatological promise that Jew and
Gentile would receive their inheritance together.68 Hui sums this up by saying
that the Holy Spirit unites Jews and Gentiles into a redefined eschatological
Israel.69
Page 19 of 22
64 Fee, Empowering, p. 807.
65 Fee, Empowering, p. 826.
66 Fee, Empowering, p. 811.
67 Fee, Empowering, p. 811.
68 Fee, Empowering, p. 812.
69 Archie Hui, ‘The Spirit of Prophecy and Pauline Pneumatology’, Tyndale Bulletin 50.1 (1999), pp. 93-115.
As a result, when Paul looks at how the Holy Spirit relates
eschatologically, he sees the coming of Spirit as proof that the end times have
arrived and also the guarantee that the promises of God will be fulfilled.
Summary
Both Paul and Luke understand the coming of the Spirit to signal the
dawning of the eschatological age. Luke emphasises the Holy Spirit
empowering the church as a community of prophets. Paul focuses on the
‘already / not yet’ tension and explains that the Spirit is the guarantee that
God will fulfil his promises. These views are not contradictory but
complementary.
Conclusion
In comparing the main facets of Lukan pneumatology to those of
Pauline pneumatology, we have seen that these two writers have different but
not conflicting theologies. Luke’s understanding of the Holy Spirit is
missiological in nature while Paul’s is soteriological. Paul has a more
developed view, while Luke’s perspective, is more limited.’70 Stronstad makes
the point that anti-Charismatics need to realise that Luke does teach a
charismatic pneumatology that is valid for today. Pentecostals on the other
hand need to understand that with the baptism of the Spirit comes a
responsibility for mission.71
I believe that in order for the church to be healthy it needs to
experience the Holy Spirit as taught by both Luke and Paul. This is not a case
of choosing one against the other, we need to embrace both. In the words of
the writer of Ecclesiates: ‘It is good that you should take hold of the one,
without letting go of the other; for the one who fears God shall succeed with
both.’ (Eccl. 7:18)
Page 20 of 22
70 Menzies, Spirit, p. 56., Dunn, Christ, p.11.
71 Stronstad, Charismatic, p. 83.
Bibliography
1. De Kock, Wynand J., ‘Pentecostal Power For A Pentecostal Task: Empowerment Through Engagement In South African Context’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 16 (2000)
2. Dunn, James D.G., The Christ and the Spirit. Volume 2 Pneumatology (Eerdmans Publishing Company; Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1998)
3. Dunn, James D. G., Baptism in the Holy Spirit (London: SCM, 1970)
4. Fee, Gordon D., God’s Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul (Hendrickson Publishers; Massachusetts, 1994)
5. Fee, Gordon D., How to read the Bible for all its worth: A guide to understanding the Bible (Zondervan; Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1982)
6. Hui , Archie ‘The Spir i t of Prophecy and Paul ine Pneumatology’, Tyndale Bulletin 50.1 (1999)
7. Keener, Craig S., The Spirit in the Gospels and Acts. Divine Purity and Power. (Hendrickson Publishers; Massachusetts, 1997)
8. Keener, Craig S., ‘Why Does Luke Use Tongues as a Sign of the Spirit’s Empowerment’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 15.2, (2007)
9. Marshall, I. Howard, Acts (Inter-Varsity Press; Leicester, England, 1980)
Page 21 of 22
10. Menzies, William W.; Menzies, Robert P., Spirit and Power; Foundations of Pentecostal Experience (Zondervan; Grand Rapids, Michigan, 2000)
11. Robert P. Menzies, ‘Acts 2.17-21: A Paradigm for Pentecostal Mission’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 17 (2008) .
12. Menzies, Robert P., ‘Luke’s Understanding of Baptism in the Holy Spirit: A Pentecostal Dialogues with the Reformed Tradition’, Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Volume 86.101 (2008)
13. Stronstad, Roger, The Charismatic Theology of St. Luke (Hendrickson Publishers; Massachusetts, 1984)
14. Stronstad, Roger, ‘Unity and Diversity’, Enrichment Journal, (2006), <http://enrichmentjournal.ag.org/top/Holy_Spirit/200612.cfm> [accessed 08/12/2008]
15. The Holy Bible : New Revised Standard Version. (Thomas Nelson Publishers: Nashville, 1989)
16. Turner, Max, ‘The Work of the Holy Spirit in Luke-Acts’, Word & World 23.2 (2003)
Page 22 of 22