8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
1/21
The Hidden Trapsin Decision
Making
by John S. Hammond, Ralph L.
Keeney, and Howard Raiffa
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
2/21
Group Members
Yawar Khilji
Talal Baluch
Ubaid Ullah Tanveer
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
3/21
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
4/21
The way the human brain works can sabotage
the choices we make.
In making decisions, we may be at the mercy
of our minds strange workings.
Heres how to catch thinking traps before they
become judgement disasters.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
5/21
The 6 Psychological traps that are likely to affect
the way we make decisions
THE ANCHORING TRAP
THE STATUS QUO TRAP
THE SUNK COST TRAP
THE CONFIRMING-EVIDENCE TRAP
THE FRAMING TRAP
THE ESTIMATING AND FORECASTING
TRAPS
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
6/21
1. Anchoring TrapLeads us to give disproportionate weight to the first information we
receive
How would you answer these two questions. Is the population of Turkey greater than
35 million? Whats your best estimate of Turkeys population?. If you are like most
people, the figure of 35 million cited in the first question influenced your answer to
the second question. This phenomenon is known as anchoring.
Anchoring takes many guises. Such as, a colleagues opinion, statistics in the morning
paper, or popular stereotype perceptions. In business one of the common types ofanchors is a past event or trend. A marketers attempt at projecting the sales for the
coming year often begins by looking at the sales of past years. The old numbers
become the anchors which the forecaster then adjusts based on other factors.
In situations characterized by rapid changes, historical anchors can lead to poor
forecasts and in turn misguided choices.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
7/21
What can you do about it?
Always view a problem from differentperspectives. Try using alternative starting points.
Think about the problem on your own before
consulting others to avoid being anchored bytheir ideas.
Seek information from a wide variety of sourcesand push your mind in fresh directions.
Do not anchor your advisors / consultants withyour own opinion or perception before seekingtheirs
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
8/21
Talal Baluch
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
9/21
Status-Quo Trap
Staying automatically with something familiar
rather then choosing appropriate or suitable
decision that involves change.
Examples:
In one, a group of people were randomly given one
of two gifts of approximately the same value
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
10/21
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
11/21
The Sunk-Cost Trap
Whenever you invest time, money, or other
resources, or whenever your personal reputation is
at stake, you will find it more difficult to change your
decision or course of action. Past experiences influencing the decision making
ability
Example:
Hiring wrong employee for the job and not firing
back because of feeling physiological safer.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
12/21
What can you do about it?
Seek out and listen carefully to the views of people
who were uninvolved with the earlier decisions and
who are hence unlikely to be committed to them.
Examine why admitting to an earlier mistakes. Remember the wise words of Warren Buffet: When
you find yourself in a hole, the best thing you can do
is stop digging.
Be on the lookout for the influence of sunk-cost
biases in the decisions and recommendations made
by your subordinates. Reassign responsibilities when
necessary.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
13/21
Ubaid Ullah Khan
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
14/21
The Confirming Evidence Trap
There are two fundamental psychological forces at work here. The first isour tendency to subconsciously decide what we want to do before wefigure out why we want to do it. The second is our inclination to be moreengaged by things we like than by things we dislike.Naturally then, we aredrawn to information that supports our subconscious learnings.
This bias leads us to seek out information that supports our existing instinct
or point of view while avoiding information that contradicts it. The confirming evidence bias not only affects where we go to collect
evidence but also on how we interpret the evidence we do receive, leadingus to give too much weight to supporting information and too little toconflicting information.
Its not that you shouldn't make the choice youre subconsciously drawn to.
Its just that youwant to be sure its the smart choice. You need to put it tothe test.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
15/21
What can you do about it?
Check to see whether you are examining all evidence withequal rigor.
Get someone you respect to play devils advocate. To argueagainst the decision you are contemplating. Better yet, build
the counter arguments yourself. Whats the strongest reasonto do something else?
Be honest with yourself about your motives. Are youlooking for a smart choice or are you looking to reconfirmyour opinion.
In seeking advice from others, dont ask leading questionsthat invite confirming evidence.
If your advisor always supports your point of view. Changehim. Dontsurroundyourself with yes men
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
16/21
The Framing Trap
The way a problem is framed can profoundly influence the choicesyou make. The framing trap can take many forms and is oftenclosely related to other psychological traps. A frame can establishthe status-quo or introduce an anchor. It can highlight sunk costs orlead you to confirming evidence.
Decision research highlights two types of frames that distortdecision making. Frames as gains versus losses. People are riskaverse when a problem is posed in terms of gains but risk seekingwhen a problem is posed in terms of avoiding losses. Furthermorethey tend to adopt the frame as it is presented to them rather thanrestating the problem in their own way.
A poorly framed problem can undermine even the best considereddecision.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
17/21
What can you do about it?
Dont automatically accept the initial frame, whether it wasframed by you or buy someone else. Try to reframe theproblem in various ways. Look for distortions caused by theframes.
Try posing the problem in a neutral redundant way thatcombines gains and losses or embraces different referencepoints.
At the end of your decision making process, ask your selfhow your decision would change if the frame was changed
When others recommend decisions, examine the way theyframed the problem. Challenge them with different frames.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
18/21
Tanveer
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
19/21
The Estimating and ForecastingTraps
The Over Confidence Trap: Even though most of us may not be very good at forecasts or
estimates, we tend to be over confident about our accuracy. Think of the implications for
business decisions, in which major initiatives and investments often hinge on ranges of
estimates. If managers underestimate the high end or overestimate the low end of a
crucial variable, they may miss attractive opportunities or expose themselves to far
greater risk than they realize.
The Prudence Trap:Another trap for forecasters takes the form of over cautiousness, or
prudence. When faced with high stakes decisions, we tend to adjust our estimates or
forecasts Just tobe on the safe side. The worst case analysis planning can add
enormous costs with no practical benefits as the likely hood of the worst case may be
low. Too much prudence can be as dangerous as too little.
The Recallability Trap: Even if we survive the above two traps. We frequently base our
predictions about the future events on our memory of past events, we can be overlyinfluenced by dramatic events-those that leave a strong impression on our memory.
Anything that distorts our ability to recall events in a balanced way will distort our
probability assessments.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
20/21
What can you do about it?
To reduce the effects of overconfidence, always start by
considering the extremes of the possible range of values. This
will help avoid being anchored in an initial estimate. Then
challenge your estimates of the extremes. Try to imagine
circumstances where the actual figure would fall below yourlow or above your high, and adjust your range accordingly.
To avoid the prudence trap, always state your estimates
honestly and explain to anyone who would use them that
they have not been adjusted. To minimize distortion through recall-ability, get actual
statistics whenever possible and try not to be guided by
impressions.
8/10/2019 Sumera Khan Presentation
21/21
Thank You