8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
1/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
2/116
DEDICATION
edicated to my beloved Family members
Syed Ali Turab
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
3/116
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS i
LIST OF FIGURES iv
LIST OF TABLES ixACKNOWLEDGEMENTS x
ABSTRACT xi
CHAPTER 1 (INTRODUCTION) (1-10)
1.1. BACKGROUND 1
1.2. LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 2
1.3. ACCESSIBILITY 3
1.4. METHODOLOGY 3
1.4.1. Field Work 4
1.4.2. Lab Work 4
1.4.2.1. Preparation of the Geological Map 5
1.4.2.2. Preparation of Geological cross-section 5
1.5 LITERATURE REVIEW 6
CHAPTER 2 (REGIONAL TECTONICS) (11-28)
2.1. INTRODUCTION 11
2.2. NORTHWEST HIMALAYAS 12
2.3. TECTONIC SUBDIVISIONS 13
2.4. BOUNDARY FAULTS 18
2.5. HAZARA-KASHMIR SYNTAXIS (HKS) 19
2.5.1. The Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis; Core Structures 21
2.5.1.1. The Muzaffarabad Anticline 21
2.5.1.2. Muzaffarabad Thrust (The Jhelum Thrust) 22
2.5.1.3. NE-SW Refolding Structures 22
2.5.2. Structures Defining the Margins of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis 25
2.5.2.1. Northern and Eastern Limb 25
2.5.2.2. Western Limb 25
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
4/116
ii
2.5.2.2.1. Jhelum Fault 26
2.5.3. Tectonic Models for the Origin of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis 27
CHAPTER 3 (STRATIGRAPHIC SETUP) (29-41)
STRATIGRAPHY 29
3.1. PRECAMBRIAN 30
3.1.1. Hazara Formation 30
3.2. PALEOZOIC 31
3.2.1. Muzaffarabad Formation 32
3.3. MESOZOIC 34
3.3.1. Rara Formation 34
3.4. TERTIARY 35
3.4.1. Paleocene Rocks (Undivided) 35
3.4.2. Murree Formation 37
3.4.3. Kamlial Formation 40
CHAPTER 4 (STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY) (42-60)
INTRODUCTION 42
4.1. MAJOR STRUCTURES 42
4.1.1. Jhelum Fault 42
4.1.2. Muzaffarabad Thrust 46
4.1.3. Nathiagali Thrust 48
4.1.4. Muzaffarabad Anticline 49
4.2 OTHER TECTONIC STRUCTURES 50
4.3 CROSS SECTION AB (SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES) 56
CHAPTER 5 (NEOTECTONICS) (61-84)
NEOTECTONICS 61
5.1. NEOTECTONIC FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH JHELUM AND
ASSOCIATED FAULTS (MUZAFFARABAD-KOHALA SEGMENT) 62
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
5/116
iii
5.2. NEOTECTONIC FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE
MUZAFFARABAD THRUST 69
5.2.1. Sar Pain area, locations 5 and 6 71
5.2.2. Locations 7 and 8 78
5.2.3. Chikar Kas, location 9 795.2.4. Awan Pati, location 10 and Butlian village, location 11 80
5.2.5. Nisar Camp Muzaffarabad, location 12 81
5.2.6. Hattian Bala Landslide 83
CHAPTER 6 (DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS) (85-92)
6.1. DISCUSSION 85
6.2. CONCLUSIONS 91
REFERENCES 93
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
6/116
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 1.1 Map showing regional geology and tectonics of the area (Treloar et
al., 2000). Box shows location of the project area.
JF = Jhelum Fault, MBT = Main Boundary Thrust, MT =
Muzaffarabad Thrust, NT = Nathiagali Thrust, PT = Panjal Thrust.
2
Fig. 2.1 Regional geological map of the Northwestern Himalayas, North
Pakistan showing location of the study area (boxed area). Nathiagalli
Thrust illustrates the boundary between the metamorphic (Internal)
and the non-metamorphic (External) zones (After Coward et al.,
1988).
14
Fig. 2.2 Geological map of Northwestern Himalayas in North Pakistan
(Hazara, Kaghan, Kashmir). Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis refolds all themajor thrusts except Indus Suture zone (MMT) (After Greco, 1989).
15
Fig. 2.3 Tectonic map showing refolding of the major Himalayan thrusts by
the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis. MMT = Main Mantle Thrust; MCT =
Main Central Thrust; PT = Panjal Thrust; MBT = Main Boundary
Thrust; MT = Muzaffarabad Thrust; JF = Jhelum Fault; NT =
Nathiagali Thrust (Modified after Latif, 1970; Calkins et al., 1975;
Greco and Spencer, 1993; and this study).
20
Fig. 2.4 Map showing the refolding of first phase structures of HKS, orientedalmost at right angle to each other (After Greco, 1989).
23
Fig. 2.5 Map showing the continuation of refolding structures of HKS in
Kaghan area (After Greco, 1989).
24
Fig. 2.6 Steeply dipping Jhelum Fault exposed along River Jhelum between
Muzaffarabad and Kohala.
27
Fig. 3.1 Murree sandstone exposed along gorge sides near location 6. 38
Fig. 3.2 Cross beds in Murree sandstone near Kunhar-Jhelum Rivers Junction.
Stratigraphic younging direction is indicated by word Up. Photo
taken looking towards S60E.
38
Fig. 3.3 (a) Grey jointed sandstone of Murree Formation exposed along road
side. (b) Sole marks in Murree sandstone present at the lower face of
the exposed bed.
39
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
7/116
v
Fig. 3.4 Channel lag breccia and overlying grey sandstone of Murree
Formation.
39
Fig. 4.1 Difference in relief across Jhelum Fault; Murree Formation (left)
forming low relief while Hazara Formation (right) forming high relief
topography.
43
Fig. 4.2 Steeply dipping fault plane of Jhelum Fault exposed along the left
bank of Jhelum River between Muzaffarabad and Kohala and its equal
area stereographic projection (Location 4, Fig. 4.6).
44
Fig. 4.3 Sharp contact (Jhelum Fault) between Murree Formation and Hazara
Formation exposed along the Muzaffarabad-Kohala road at location 1
(Fig. 4.6).
45
Fig. 4.4 Jhelum Fault crossing the Kunhar River, close to its junction with the
Jhelum River near the Rara village and its stereographic projection
(Location 2, Fig. 4.6).
45
Fig. 4.5 Jhelum Fault exposed at left bank of Jhelum River due to low level of
water flow in winter. For scale, arrow shows two persons standing on
outcrop of Hazara Formation.
45
Fig. 4.6 Geological map of the study area with location of section line (AB,
Fig. 4.12). White dots indicating different Locations.
47
Fig. 4.7 Structural map of the study area showing two phases of structures
formation. Structural trend of the area is determined from results of
this study, Greco (1989) and Published GSP maps.
52
Fig. 4.8 Fold and Thrust fault in Hazara Formation at Location 3. Equal area,
great circle plots of both bedding plane and fault plane are given at the
top corners.
53
Fig. 4.9 Stereoplots showing poles to the bedding planes and Great circles of
Domain 1.
54
Fig. 4.10 Stereoplots showing poles to the bedding planes and Great circles of
Domain 2.
54
Fig. 4.11 Satellite image of 2.5 m resolution and various structures and features
identified on it using Erdas Imagine 8.4. Black lines show different
structural features including bedding and fold axes, Blue lines indicate
stream offsets, Red lines indicate Faults while Green lines show
57
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
8/116
vi
Rivers and streams.
Fig 4.12 Cross section of the study area showing different subsurface structures
and detachement at depth.
58
Fig. 4.13 Bedding parallel striations on the bedding plane of sandstone in
Murree formation indicating flexural flow mechanism of folding.
59
Fig. 5.1 Google Earth Image of the study area showing major bends in the
flow pattern of Jhelum River near Muzaffarabad and Kunhar River
near Rara village signifying neotectonic effects of the Muzaffarabad
Thrust, Jhelum Fault and the inferred Rara Fault.
63
Fig. 5.2 Close-up view of the bends in Kunhar River Flow direction (Yellow
lines) in relation with the strike slip faults (Red lines). Dashed line
shows probable strike slip fault.
65
Fig 5.3 Google Earth Image showing trace of Jhelum Fault passing through
the Jhelum river bend, the PM Secretariate and the Parliament lodges
at Lower Chattar. a shows the location from where the Photo of
Figure 5.4 was taken and b shows location of the Figure 4.3.
66
Fig. 5.4 Field photograph of steeply cut fluvial terrace near lower chattar,
Muzaffarabad. Photo taken (from point a in Fig. 5.3 and point 1 in
Fig. 5.5), looking roughly towards South.
66
Fig. 5.5 Close-up view showing sharp bend in River Jhelum flow direction and
truncation of associated fluvial terrace. 1 shows the location from
where the Photo of Figure 5.4 was taken and 2 shows location of the
Figure 4.3.
68
Fig. 5.6 A satellite-image view showing tributary stream avulsion by the
Jhelum Fault in the Lower Jhelum Valley. Note Jhelum Fault (dashed
line) coinciding with faceted spurs-fluvial terrace interface (After Ali,
2011).
68
Fig. 5.7 Surface fault trace map of Muzaffarabad Thrust by Avouac et al.
(2006) using remote sensing image analysis.
69
Fig. 5.8 Geological map prepared by Kaneda et al. (2008) based on field
mapping techniques showing trace of Muzaffarabad Thrust that
ruptured in 2005 earthquake.
70
Fig. 5.9 A Google Earth view of the active tectonic feature (2005 Erathquake 70
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
9/116
vii
Rupture-dashed line) and geomorphic features like fluvial terraces,
faceted spurs and hanging valleys along the northern slopes of the
Upper Jhelum River (Muzafarabad-Siran Segment; Muzafarabad
towards the lower left corner of the photograph) (After Ali, 2011).
Fig. 5.10 (a) Vertical separation of 3.3 meters observed in the field along thefracture R8.
(b) View of the Earthquake Pond produced after 2005 Kashmir
earthquake when the ground to the right side of the fault trace
(hanging wall) was uplifted relatively to left side (foot wall). Photo
taken looking towards NW.
(c) Change in the Tree Line observed from a distance indicating
uplift. Houses visible are of Sar Pain village (Photo taken looking
towards west).
72
Fig. 5.11 This photograph shows the tilting of the ground surface after 2005
earthquake. Distant newer graves (at the top of photo) are of the
victims of Kashmir earthquake devastation, unquestionably built after
the earthquake, are positioned horizontally where as the older graves
at the fore front of this photo are tilted to the right side (Photo taken
looking towards SE).
72
Fig. 5.12 (a) Block diagram showing different data parameters recorded along
key rupture surfaces. d: displacement; dp: depth; l: length; w: width.
(b) An example showing typical rupture surface observed on a fluvial
terrace. Note, the data parameters described in a fit into the surface
geometry of the rupture.
73
Fig. 5.13 (a and b) photographs showing ground rupture features with vertical
displacements (d). These rupture zones were observed on fluvial
terrace on the left bank of the Jhelum River, location 5. Top
photograph shows at least four levels of scarp-lets within ~12m.
Arrows show normal shear sense.
75
Fig.5.14 (a) Photograph and (b) sketch showing fracture pattern associated with
the rupture, close to the survey point 15, photo taken looking towards
southwest. (c) En-echelon pattern with small rhombohedral grabens.
76
Fig. 5.15 Detailed map and a cross section of the fractures observed at location 77
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
10/116
viii
5 near Sar Pain area. Density diagram is also provided (See text for
details).
Fig. 5.16 Detailed map and a cross section of the fractures observed at location
6 near Sar Pain area. Density diagram is also provided (See text for
details).
78
Fig. 5.17 (a) Location 7 shows fracture pattern along the metalled road.
Negligible vertical displacement was observed on the road with few
centimeters of opening or extension. Inset shows cracks in the brick
wall. The orientation of these cracks follows the rupture trend. (b)
Location 8, photograph showing the trace of rupture zone from
location 5. Note the fracture pattern is very similar as observed at
locations 5 and 6. Inset shows details of the fracture pattern. (c)
Location 9, Chikar Kas, where ground rupture is trending NW-SE and
is manifested as complete collapse of semi-concrete houses and tilting
of trees.
79
Fig. 5.18 (a) Reverse fault observed on the way to Awan Pati town, Location
10. The fault is observed in the bed rock. The attitude of the fault is
close to the main rupture trend. Note, 1) washing out of the road due
to fracturing and sinking, and 2) fault displaces recent colluvium and
vegetation. (b) Location 11, unusual bulge on terrace near Butlian
village as a consequence of 2005 Kashmir earthquake.
81
Fig. 5.19 Field photograph showing the Failure surface of landslide near Nisar
camp in the background and the bulging due to Muzaffarabad Thrust
in the foreground, complimented by tilting of trees and localization of
destruction along the crest of bulging.
83
Fig. 5.20 (a and b) Satellite images (2.5metre resolution) showing location of
the areas (5 to 11), where surface rupture, caused by the 2005 Kashmir
earthquake, was studied in detailed.
84
Fig. 5.21 Photograph showing the south eastern face of Dana Hill which slided
down and blocked Karli River forming Karli lake. Photo taken from
the high point on Landslide deposit and looking towards northwest.
Vehicles are shown for scale (Modified after Dunning et al., 2007).
84
Fig. 6.1 Bedding-Cleavage relationship as observed in outcrops of Murree 88
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
11/116
ix
Formation along Muzaffarabad-Srinagar road near location 6.
Stereographic projection shows the orientation of intersection
lineation formed.
Fig. 6.2 Very steep foliation developed in shales of Murree Formation near
location 7 showing NE-SW directed stresses. Axial plane of smallkink folding is also visible (marker for scale).
90
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Table showing formation thicknesses used to construct cross-section
(Fig. 4.12).
6
Table 3.1 Table showing the composite stratigraphy of the study area (from
Calkins et al., 1975; Greco, 1989; Greco and Spencer, 1993; Kazmiand Jan, 1997; Hussain et al., 2004; Kazmi and Abbasi, 2008; Shah,
2009).
29
Table 3.2 Table showing the stratigraphic comparison of Muzaffarabad with
Abbottabad and Kotli areas.
33
Table 4.1 Attitude data of the study area used for structural analysis. 55
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
12/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
13/116
xi
ABSTRACT
The disastrous earthquake of 8 th October, 2005 in Kashmir and surrounding regions produced excellent neotectonic features on mesoscopic to regional scale henceresulting in drawing attention of the global geoscientific community. The study areaof this research is defined by rocks of two tectonic realms i.e. Lesser Himalayas andSub Himalayas separated by Jhelum Fault (JF) / Main Boundary Thrust (MBT). Theserocks are folded on a regional scale around antiformal structure called HazaraKashmir Syntaxis (HKS) with rocks of lesser Himalayas exposed along the limbs andapex where as that of sub Himalayas covering its core.
This earthquake ruptured Muzaffarabad Thrust between Balakot city in the NW andSudhan Gali in the SE. Detailed rupture mapping was carried out on 1:100 scale attwo small hillocks near Sar Pain area on Muzaffarabad-Srinagar road. Here the faulttrace is characterized by broad zone of fractures running through lose sediments offluvial terraces. Maximum vertical displacement recorded along these fractures is
3.3m. Other neotectonic features associated with 2005 earthquake, and henceMuzaffarabad Thrust, include convex bulging of cultivated land close to its trace;tilting of man-made features / structures; ponds formation on the footwall as hangingwall was uplifted along Muzaffarabad Thrust and blocked the flow of streams runningacross its trace; and change in a pre-earthquake straight tree-line across MuzaffarabadThrust indicating uplift. There were many associated landslides distributed along thetrace of Muzaffarabad Thrust but those at Nisar Camp and Hattian Bala locations arenote worthy.
Neotectonic features of the Jhelum Fault were studied using satellite image analysisand field observations. Stream flow pattern was used as a major indicator ofneotectonic activity along Jhelum Fault on satellite images. A 140 bend in flow
pattern of Jhelum River near Muzaffarabad city is due to neotetonic activity alongJhelum Fault. Stream avulsion of the western tributaries of lower Jhelum River is alsoidentified on satellite images. Field evidences of neotectonic activity along JhelumFault include stream offset and dissected sedimentation bars. Another characteristicfeature is the change in topographic relief across the trace of Jhelum Fault.
Satellite image analysis was also used for identification of different lithologies andstructures exposed in the study area. The results displayed a good match with fieldobservations and previously published literature. Two distinct structural domains wereidentified based on the strike data. Most of the structures lying in Domain 1 areoriented more or less in NNE direction indicating that this area has taken up effect ofJhelum Fault. Whereas Domain 2 is affected by NE-SW shortening, resulting information of NW oriented structures almost parallel to Muzaffarabad Thrust.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
14/116
1
CHAPTER 1 (INTRODUCTION)
1.1. BACKGROUND
This study was carried out in Azad Jammu and Kashmir and parts of Hazara division,
Pakistan. The area captured special attention of the global geoscientific community
after the 8 October, 2005, Kashmir earthquake which almost wiped out an entire
generation of human being in Balakot, Bagh, Muzaffarabad and the adjoining areas.
Thousands of people lost their lives in a few seconds with many more left behind as
injured and homeless, thus reinforcing the need to better understand earthquakes, their
significance and processes of their occurrences and mitigating the risks. Therefore,
the surroundings of Muzaffarabad were selected for the structural and neotectonic
studies because it was worst affected by October 8, 2005 earthquake.
The city of Muzaffarabad lies close to the junction of two active faults, the
Muzaffarabad Thrust and the Jhelum Fault. The former is responsible for the deadly
earthquake of October 08, 2005; whereas the Jhelum Fault has been relatively inactive
in the recent past. It forms a part of the western limb of Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis
which is a major fold structure in Pakistani Himalayas (Fig. 1.1). This spectacular
structural feature of the Himalayas was first discussed in detail by Wadia (1931) who
referred to it as the Syntaxis of the Northwest Himalaya.
This research work was focused on identifying structural and neotectonic features
associated with Muzaffarabad Thrust and the western limb of Hazara-Kashmir
Syntaxis (HKS) which comprises of Jhelum Fault and Nathiagali Thrust, and finally
correlating these features with the regional structural trend of the area. Special focus
was on recording both mesostructures as well as mega structures.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
15/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
16/116
3
1.3. ACCESSIBILITY
The study area is mostly mountainous, increasing in height towards north and
contains good network of roads to major settlements as well as far-flung villages.
Muzaffarabad city, capital of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, is connected to Islamabad by
air and road. Its distance from Rawalpindi is 138 kilometers and is at about 76
kilometers from Abbottabad. Muzaffarabad can also be reached by road from
Mansehra via Balakot and then Garhi Habibullah. There are also few narrow roads
which lead to the western parts of the study area from the eastern parts of Abbottabad
e.g. Nathiagali and Thandiani etc.
Good cross-sectional exposures and traverse sites are accessible along the rivers and
streams flowing across the general strike of the area. The study area is crossed by
numerous such streams in addition to three major rivers which are having perennial
flow including Kunhar River, Jhelum River and Neelum River.
1.4. METHODOLOGY
Reconnaissance study of the area was done by studying satellite images using
computer softwares like Erdas Imagine 8.4 and ArcGIS 9.2. Combined with published
geological maps, satellite image analysis was used to delineate the major fold and
fault structures, and stratigraphic units prior to undertaking the field studies.
Neotectonic studies of the area were carried out, with focus on recording neotectonic
activities in Quaternary terrace deposits in the field and studying drainage patterns
and recognizing stream offsets using both satellite image analysis as well as field
checks.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
17/116
4
1.4.1. Field Work
Field work was carried out in the area from Hatian to Muzaffarabad along the
Muzaffarabad Thrust, from Muzaffarabad to Kohala along the western limb of
Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis and along Agar Nala to cover the area between the Jhelum
Fault and Muzaffarabad Thrust (Fig. 1.1). Traverses were also made to document
structural and neotectonic features along streams and gorges which provide good
exposures across the regional strike.
Two separate field visits were made to the area. First field work was carried out from
1st to 3 rd February, 2008. This visit was intended to identify the vital areas for
comprehensive studies. Second field work was designed after a month from 29 th
February to 3 rd March 2008. In this field excursion, thorough study of Muzaffarabad
Thrust trace was done with meter-scale rupture mapping at Sar Pain. Attention was
also paid to record other features which evidenced the neotectonic nature of the fault
i.e. uplifting, bulging and tilting of the surface and their effects e.g. blocking of water
flow in stream(s) etc.
1.4.2. Lab Work
After collecting data in the field, it was transferred to computer and various
components were selected for further work. Following is a general procedure that was
adopted in the lab work:
i. Prior to the commencement of field work, Satellite images were first studied in the
lab to delineate the regional scale structural trend of the area.
ii. The data collected in the field was assembled in the lab.
iii. Data was then converted to acceptable formats for use in computer software for
stereographic projections
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
18/116
5
iv. Stereonet plots of the data were prepared in the lower hemisphere using Rick
Allmendingers StereoWin 1.2 software.
v. Based on stereographic projections various sub-groups of data set were
recognized, analyzed and used for interpretation.
vi. Geological map and a cross-section were then prepared from field observations.
vii. All maps, stereographic projections, cross-sectional profile and diagrams were
used in writing the final report and interpreting the results.
1.4.2.1. Preparation of Geological Map
Detailed geological map of the area was prepared using published geological maps of
Geological Survey of Pakistan as base maps. The study area is covered by Survey of
Pakistan toposheet Numbers 43 F/7, 43 F/8, 43 F/11 and 43 F/12. All the geological
maps are present in National Library of Earth Sciences (NLES), National Centre of
Excellence in Geology (NCEG), University of Peshawar, except the 43 F/8. Therefore
the geological map of Latif (1970) was used as base map to cover for the area of 43
F/8. Final layout of geological map with proper scale and legend was prepared in
ArcMap 9.2 software by integrating the field observations and satellite image
analysis.
1.4.2.2. Preparation of Geological cross-section
Geological cross-section was constructed across the structures in mapped area to
understand the subsurface geometry. Following are the general steps that were
followed for the construction of cross-section.
i. A section line was selected on the map that crossed maximum of lithologies and
structures at about right angle. A jog was thus inserted in the section line to
incorporate the southwestern syncline in the section.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
19/116
6
ii. Profile was constructed from SRTM DEM file by using the computer software
Global Mapper 8.03.
iii. Cross section was finally constructed using 2DMove 5.0 software. Kink method
was followed for cross-section construction. Thicknesses of different formations
were taken from the published work of the study area (Table 1.1).
iv. Dip data used for the construction of cross-section shows an integration of data
from GSP maps and the field observations.
Table 1.1. Table showing formation thicknesses used to construct cross-section (Fig.
4.12).
S. No. Formation NameThickness
(in meters)Reference
1 Kamlial Formation about 1500Measured from cross-section
(this study)
2 Murree Formation 1524 Calkins et al. (1975)
3Paleocene Rocks
(Undivided)200
Greco (1989), Greco and Spencer
(1993)
4Muzaffarabad
Formation 762 Calkins et al. (1975)
1.5. LITERATURE REVIEW
The earliest work on geology of Hazara Kashmir region dates back to the 2 nd half of
ninteenth century and continued into the first half of previous century. This work is
concentrated on the age determination, stratigraphic correlation and structural and
tectonic work. Examples of prominent work in this area include Verchre (1866 and
1867), Wynne (1873), Lyddekar (1883), Middlemiss (1896), Wadia (1928, 1931, and
1934).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
20/116
7
Wadia (1931) worked in detail on the Tectonics, Orogeny and stratigraphy of the
Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis. He referred to it as Syntaxis of the Northwest Himalaya
and presented the earliest model for its formation. He inferred an original horst or a
triangular promontory of Gondwanaland (which he termed The Foreland) to be the
main reason of formation of the syntaxis. According to him, the foreland is
tectonically overlain by The Autochthonous Fold Belt which itself is lying below the
The Nappe Zone. Wadia (1931) divided the area into eight major mappable
stratigraphic units, thus established the broad structural-stratigraphic relationships in
the area.
Latif (1970) mapped the southeastern Hazara and adjoining parts of Rawalpindi and
Muzaffarabad in great detail. He presented completely new stratigraphic
nomenclature for the rocks exposed in the area and recognized eight major
lithostratigraphic groups which were further classified into 21 different lithologic
subunits. Latifs map thus provides great structural and stratigraphic details.
Calkins et al. (1975) had mapped the area in detail and explained the stratigraphy and
structure of a sequence of rocks that range in age from Precambrian to Miocene. They
reported that the structural pattern of western limb of Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis
developed in two phases of deformation. In the first phase, the tectonic transport was
towards south having strong east and southeast wards pressure while the second phase
demonstrates the west and southwest wards countermovement of rocks in the
compressed axial zone in response to the continued south and southwest wards
movement of rocks on the longer eastern limb. The major structural terminologies
used in this thesis are taken from Calkins et al. (1975) e.g. Muzaffarabad Anticline
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
21/116
8
and Hazara-Kashmir Synaxis. This work was done jointly by the Geological survey of
Pakistan and U.S. Geological Survey.
Bossart et al. (1984 and 1988) studied the tectonic structure of the Hazara-Kashmir
Syntaxis by integrating the rock deformation and regional scale tectonics. They
reported two sets of superimposed major folds with related minor structures. Hence
they presented a tectonic model for the formation of Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis that the
syntaxis is formed as a result of early nappe formation by southwest ward thrusting of
metamorphosed Himalayan rocks, proceeded by development of large shear zone
structure and lastly by the overthrusting of rock units from northwest to southeast.
Greco (1989) and Greco and Spencer (1993) discussed the stratigraphical, tectonic
and metamorphic features of the area. They divided the area into four main tectonic
elements (i.e. Subhimalaya, Lesser Himalaya, Higher Himalaya and Kohistan
sequence) and correlated it with the Indian Kashmir Himalayas to the east. A tectonic
model is proposed based on detailed superficial structures including small scale
structures (stretching lineation, schistosity and crenulation cleavage), rock distribution
and petrographic studies. Geometrical superposition of deformational phases detected
by small and large scale structures and by pressure-temperature history of the
collected samples is also in accordance with this model. Greco (1989) gave the name
Rara Formation to a NS oriented, fault bounded package of rocks lying between
Murree Formation in the east and Hazara Formation in the west.
Bossart and Ottiger (1990) carried out paleomagnetic and structural analyses of three
sections of Murree Formation along the core of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis. These
sections are located in Jhelum, Neelum and Kaghan valleys. Thus he reported 45 of
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
22/116
9
clockwise rotation of the axial zone of Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis relative to the Indian
craton.
Treloar et al. (1992) worked on the large scale tectonic geometries of Northwest
Himalaya. Taking the dominant transport direction throughout the Himalayan history
as towards S or SSE, He came up with a model that the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis has
been formed by the mechanical impediment by the interference and thus pinning of
two converging Pakistani and Kashmir thrust sheets. This pinning resulted in the
rotation of these sheets forming the present geometry of Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis.
Arbab and Shah (1996) of Geological Survey of Pakistan published a detailed
geological map of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Their map portrays good details and
explanatory notes on the stratigraphy, structure and economic geology of the area.
Avouac et al. (2006) determined displacement along Muzaffarabad Thrust based on
remote sensing analyses using sub-pixel correlation of ASTER images. According to
them, average displacement is around 4m with maximum value of 7 m northeast of
Muzaffarabad.
Kaneda et al. (2008) mapped in detail the surface rupture of causative fault of
Kashmir earthquake 2005. Vertical separation of ~ 7 m was recorded by them and
declared that this fault is not accommodating the main Himalayan contraction because
they calculated the shortening rate and recurrence interval for this fault to be 1.4-4.1
mm/yr and 1000-3300 years, respectively.
Gahalaut (2006) classified the October 08, 2005 Kashmir earthquake as either entirely
occurring in the updip part of Indus Kohistan Seismic Zone (IKSZ) or involving some
part of detachment under Kashmir Himalayas but definitely not occurring in the
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
23/116
10
Kashmir gap. Rather, he feared that this earthquake may have increased the stresses in
Kashmir Himalayas.
Owen et al. (2008) studied the landslides triggered by October 08, 2005 Kashmir
earthquake. Based on different geomorphic-geologic-anthropogenic settings, they
divided these landslides into six different types and concluded that the earthquake-
triggered landslides are mostly restricted to particular zones related with lithology,
structure, geomorphology, topography and human presence.
Dunning et al. (2007) studied in detail the Hattian Bala Landslide, the largest
landslide triggered by October 08, 2005 earthquake. They classified the landslide as
Rock Avalanche, measured various parameters and gave their quantitative data such
as length, width, area and volumes of landslide deposit and dammed lakes
respectively.
Khan et al. (2003) mainly contributed on the structure, tectonics and stratigraphy of
the area. Based on residual gravity data in the area, they studied shallow geological
structure in the core of Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis.
Munir and Mirza (2007) worked on the stratigraphic aspects of the 2005 earthquake
and concluded that the decollement is marked by the under lying shales of Kuldana
Formation. He also identified two unconformities during this study.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
24/116
11
CHAPTER 2 (REGIONAL TECTONICS)
2.1. INTRODUCTION
The project is located in a part of the western Himalayas, which marks a major bend
in the Himalayan trend termed as the Western Syntaxis (Wadia, 1957). East of this
syntaxis, the Himalayas have a NW-SE trend compared to the part of the Himalayas
west of the syntaxis which have a WSW-ENE trend. The western syntaxis, comprises
two syntaxial bends. One in the north, involving Higher Himalayas and the Kohistan
Block, is termed the Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, while southern bend involving the Lesser
and the Sub-Himalayas is termed Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis (Calkins et al., 1975). It is
the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis, which marks the junction between the Kashmir
Himalayas in the east and the Hazara-Pothowar Himalayas in the west and most
significant to tectonic setting of the study area.
Himalayas owe their origin to plate tectonics and have resulted from the continent-
continent collision during Cretaceous-Early Tertiary between the Indian and Eurasian
plates, which sandwiched the Kohistan Island arc in collision between the two. This
era of collision tectonics and mountain-building is named as the Himalayan orogeny.
There are several regional scale faults which control the overall geology and
geomorphology of the Himalayas.
Deformation in Himalayas is propagating towards south. From north towards south,
the tectonic elements are: a) Main Karakoram Thrust (MKT) or Shyok suture zonewhich separates the rocks of Eurasian plate from the rocks of Kohistan Island Arc
(KIA), b) Main Mantle Thrust (MMT) or Indus suture zone which brings the rocks of
Kohistan Island Arc (Kohistan sequence) on top of the Higher Himalayan rocks
belonging to the Indian Plate, c) Main Central Thrust (MCT); separating rocks of the
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
25/116
12
higher Himalayas from lesser Himalayas and d) Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) is
present between rocks of lesser Himalayas and sub Himalayas.
The study area occupies the west-central part of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis, which
comprises tectonic units belonging to the Lesser Himalayas in the limbs and those of
the Sub Himalayas in the core. Neotectonic activity is prominent along the western
limb of Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis, where several faults merge into one another. This
part of western limb lies between Muzaffarabad and Balakot and is termed the
Balakot Shear Zone. This shear zone continues with the Jhelum Fault to the south of
Muzaffarabad, while the Muzaffarabad Thrust joins the shear zone to the northwest of
Muzaffarabad. The Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis is younger than MCT, MBT and PT, as
it folds these fault structures; however, the Muzaffarabad Thrust and the Jhelum Fault
are suspected to have reactivated several times after the formation of the syntaxis,
including the recent-most neotectonics associated with Kashmir Earthquake 2005.
In this chapter, the regional tectonic setting of the NW Himalayas will be analyzed
with special emphasis to the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis (HKS). Since the Kashmir
Earthquake 2005 epicentred in the vicinity of the project site, it is felt pertinent to
fully analyze the tectonic models which explain the formation of this syntaxial bend.
It is noteworthy that Pakistan has about half a dozen of oroclinal bends (syntaxis), of
which at least three are distinctly related with active faulting and recent earthquakes
e.g., Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis, and Quetta Syntaxis.
2.2. NORTHWEST HIMALAYAS
Since the Himalayas have formed from the collision of Indian plate with Eurasian
plate, thus it represents the deformed northern part of the Indian plate and shows that
the region to the south of the Main Mantle Thrust (MMT) is included in the
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
26/116
13
Himalayas. The Nanga Parbat-Haramosh Syntaxis represents the most northern part
of the Himalayas in north Pakistan. In general, the northern parts of the Himalayas are
demarcated by the mountain ranges of Kashmir, Upper Kaghan (south of Babusar),
Upper Hazara (Allai Kohistan and to the south), Besham and Indus Syntaxis, lower
Swat (south of Mingora), Chakdara, and Bajaur-Mohmand with the Salt Ranges and
the Trans-Indus Ranges delineating its southern limits in north Pakistan.
2.3. TECTONIC SUBDIVISIONS
Coward et al. (1988) divided the northwestern Himalayas into internal (or hinterland)
and external (or foreland) zones. The internal zone is comprised of crystalline rocks of
Naran, Upper Kashmir, Upper Hazara, Besham and Swat lying immediately to the
south of the MMT (Fig. 2.1). Whereas the external zone is considered to be a type of
foreland thrust-fold belt, comprising of successions of sedimentary rocks of Hill
Ranges (e.g., Kohat, Kalachitta, and Margala), the Salt Ranges-Trans-Indus Ranges,
and Potwar-Kohat plateau. The tectonic boundary between the internal and external
zones is marked by the Nathiagalli-Khairabad Thrust.
Gansser (1964) divided the rocks of central and eastern Himalayas into Tethyan
Himalayas, Higher Himalayas, Lesser Himalayas and Sub Himalayas (Fig. 2.2). The
Tethyan Himalayas are best developed in eastern and central Himalayas but are absent
from the western Himalayas of north Pakistan. It is comprised of unmetamorphosed
stratified rocks of Precambrian- Eocene age. The rocks of Higher Himalayas are
abundantly exposed just to the south of the MMT in Kaghan, upper Kashmir, Hazara,
and Swat areas. These rocks are comprised of Proterozoic aged crystalline rocks
which are metamorphosed during Himalayan orogeny. The MCT shows the southern
boundary of the Higher Himalayas and distinguishes it from the Lesser Himalayas.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
27/116
14
The segregation of Higher and Lesser Himalayas is uncertain in north Pakistan
because MCT is only well developed in eastern and central Himalayas and its
extension beyond Kaghan is controversial. In northern Pakistan, the counterparts of
the Lesser Himalayas are considered to be consisting of an inner (or Abbottabad) zone
and an outer (or Kalachitta) zone. The latter includes Kohat, Kalachitta, and Margala
Hill Ranges and comprises of unmetamorphosed sedimentary rocks of Triassic to
Eocene age.
Fig. 2.1. Regional geological map of the Northwestern Himalayas, North Pakistan
showing location of the study area (boxed area). Nathiagalli Thrust
illustrates the boundary between the metamorphic (Internal) and the non-
metamorphic (External) zones (After Coward et al., 1988).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
28/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
29/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
30/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
31/116
18
2.4. BOUNDARY FAULTS
The Himalayas of northern Pakistan are the structural expression of the continent-
continent collision and thus exhibit a variety of major structures. The internal zone of
northern Pakistan contains five main thrust sheets (Treloar et al., 1989). From east to
west they are Upper Kaghan, lower Kaghan, Hazara, Besham and Swat. All these
thrust sheets are bordered by fault structures and their emplacement is considered to
have been taken place in the last 45 Ma. (post-peak metamorphism).
A traverse in the Kaghan valley along the Kaghan River offers a symbolic
representation of the major structures in the Himalayas of northern Pakistan.Various
major boundary faults separating the aforementioned thrust sheets of markedly
diverse tectono-stratigraphic framework can be identified here in this region (Fig.
2.2).
A younger phase of N-S oriented folding have folded all the major thrusts in the
Internal Zone of the Himalaya producing the N-S oriented regional scale fold
structures such as the Nanga Parbat Syntaxis, Besham-Darband Syntaxis and Hazara
Kashmir Syntaxis. This phase of N-S folding is younger than the MBT and thus it
took place in the last < 8 Ma. Hence the Quaternary fault structures are mostly
oriented N-S and are commonly associated with the limbs of these N-S oriented fold
structures for instance the Balakot Fault at the western limb of the Hazara-Kashmir
Syntaxis and the Raikot-Sassi Fault at the western limb of the Nanga Parbat Syntaxis.
Similarly, the Besham Syntaxis is also cut across by numerous N-S faults including
the Puran, Chakesar and Darband faults.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
32/116
19
To the south of the Main Boundary Thrust, the Kohat-Pothowar Plateau and the Salt
ranges are bounded at their southern margin by a major boundary fault termed the
Main Frontal Thrust, which is the youngest boundary fault in Himalayas.
2.5. HAZARA-KASHMIR SYNTAXIS (HKS)
The Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis is a NNW trending regional-scale antiform that folds
the Lesser- and Sub-Himalayas and also the Higher Himalayas to some extent. Unlike
the classical anticlines, where the core is occupied by the oldest rocks and the limbs
comprise successively younger rocks, the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis exposes the
youngest rocks (i.e., Mid Tertiary and younger molasses sediments of Rawalpindi-
Siwalik Group) in the core, and successively older rocks in the limbs. This owes to
crustal stacking due to thrusting prior to the development of the Hazara-Kashmir
syntaxial structure. This N-S oriented mega-fold structure is the youngest of the
tectonic features in the region. Except for the Himalayan Frontal Thrust, all the major
thrusts including MBT, Panjal Thrust and MCT are refolded by this structure. Like
Nanga Parbat syntaxis, the western margin of the HKS is characterized by strong
neotectonic activity manifested in the form of Kashmir Earthquake 2005. Several
boundary thrusts, some of which are off course equivalent to the PT and the MBT are
involved in folding related with the HKS. These include the Mansehra Thrust, Oghi
Shear, Murree Thrust, Nathiagali Thrust, Muzaffarabad Thrust and the Jhelum Fault
(Fig. 2.3). Because of varying nomenclature, and looping together of several fault
structures, it is at time confusing to fully appreciate the tectonics of the HKS.
Therefore, an attempt is made below to clarify this tectonic set up.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
33/116
20
Fig. 2.3. Tectonic map showing refolding of the major Himalayan thrusts by the
Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis. MMT = Main Mantle Thrust; MCT = MainCentral Thrust; PT = Panjal Thrust; MBT = Main Boundary Thrust; MT =
Muzaffarabad Thrust; JF = Jhelum Fault; NT = Nathiagali Thrust (Modified
after Latif, 1970; Calkins et al., 1975; Greco and Spencer, 1993; and this
study).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
34/116
21
The structures in the HKS are divided into two groups for the sake of description: the
core structures and the limb structures.
2.5.1. The Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis: Core Structures
There are three structures in the core of the HKS that are most significant. 1)
Muzaffarabad Anticline, and 2) Jhelum Thrust, 3) NE Trending Refold Structures. In
the following these three structures will be elaborated in detail.
2.5.1.1. The Muzaffarabad Anticline
The overall structure in the HKS, especially in its northern part, north of the Jhelum
River can be visualized as a large doubly plunging southwest-verging anticline, with a
well developed NE limb and a highly tectonized and attenuated SW limb. The core of
this structure is exposed near Muzaffarabad, and hence the structure is appropriately
termed as the Muzaffarabad Anticline (Calkins et al., 1975; Bossart et al., 1984;
Hussain et al., 2004).
The doubly plunging anticline exposes the deepest stratigraphic levels in a 30 km long
stretch between Muzaffarabad and Balakot, where the core is occupied by carbonates
of Muzaffarabad Formation. In the eastern outer limbs of the anticline, immediately
overlying the Muzaffarabad Formation, there is another set of carbonate rocks of
Paleocene-Eocene age. It is marked by unconformable lower contact with the
Muzaffarabad Formation and unconformable upper contact with the Murree
Formation. The Murree Formation occupies the entire eastern limb of the
Muzaffarabad Anticline as well as the northern apex of the syntaxis.
The western limb of the Muzaffarabad anticline is highly attenuated because of
involvement in and reworking by the faults marking the western limb of the HKS.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
35/116
22
2.5.1.2. Muzaffarabad Thrust (The Jhelum Thrust)
The Muzaffarabad Thrust marks contact of the Muzaffarabad Formation with the
Murree Formation at the western limb of the Muzaffarabad anticline (Calkins et al.,
1975). It is a steep thrust (25o-50
o) exposed immediately east of Muzaffarabad. The
thrust is refolded along the Neelum River, before it stretches NW towards the
Balakot, where it merges with Panjal Thrust and MBT at the western margin of the
Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis (Fig. 2.3). The 2005 Kashmir Earthquake ruptured the
Muzaffarabad Thrust as well as its southeastern extension (Tanda Fault of Nakata et
al., 1991) in an over 100 km stretch between Balakot in the north to Bagh in the SE,
that established existence of a major thrust along this stretch.
2.5.1.3. NE-SW Refolding Structures
The Muzaffarabad Anticline and related structures, including the Muzaffarabad
Thrust, which mark the first phase of structures in the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis, are
refolded through a subsequent phase of deformation. The structures related with this
folding are oriented ENE-WSW, almost at right angle to first-phase structures and
thus result in their refolding. About three such folds refold the core of the
Muzaffarabad Anticline in the vicinity of Muzaffarabad (Fig. 2.4). The largest of
these refold structure is defined by the Neelum reentrant, whereby the axis of the
Muzaffarabad Anticline as well as the Muzaffarabad Thrust form a NE trending fold
structure around the Neelum River as it enters Muzaffarabad (Fig. 2.3). Greco (1989)
have shown that this phase of folding is widespread in the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis
as well as in the Lesser and Higher Himalayas in the Kaghan area (Fig. 2.5).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
36/116
23
Fig. 2.4. Map showing the refolding of first phase structures of HKS, oriented almost
at right angle to each other (After Greco, 1989).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
37/116
24
Fig. 2.5. Map showing the continuation of refolding structures of HKS in Kaghan
area (After Greco, 1989).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
38/116
25
2.5.2. Structures Defining the Margins of the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis
The Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis is a half-window structure which is typically exposed
through erosion of the overlying thrust sheets. The remnants of these thrusts are now
confined to the margins of the syntaxis in the form of a NNW oriented loop. As
mentioned above, the western margin of the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis is more
tectonized than its northern apex or eastern limb. In the following, the margins of the
syntaxis will therefore be described in two separate sections.
2.5.2.1. Northern and Eastern Limb
The margin of the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis north of Balakot and its further extension
towards the SE is primarily bounded by the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT). Although
the MBT is classically defined as the thrust contact between the Mesozoic-Eocene
carbonate platform and the Miocene molasse sediments of the Murree Formation, this
condition is met only locally in the Kaghan valley near Paras. In this part of the
Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis, a tectonic sliver (~ 2 km thick) containing carbonates from
Jurassic to Eocene age, is in contact with the Murree Formation in the Hazara
Kashmir Syntaxis core. Elsewhere the Murree Formation is in direct tectonic contact
with the Permian-Triassic aged Panjal Formation. The Panjal Thrust, in this part of
the syntaxis is a separate entity following the outer part of the syntaxial margin
defining a tectonic boundary between the Panjal Formation and overlying
Precambrian Salkhala Formation.
2.5.2.2. Western Limb
The western margin of the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis is far more complex than the
eastern margin. The MBT and the Panjal Thrust, which remain as separate entities on
the eastern margin as well as the northern apex of the syntaxis, merge with each other
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
39/116
26
some five kilometers north of Balakot and continue southwards as a single fault. The
rock units on the either side of the fault are also variable. In the vicinity of Balakot,
the fault separates the Murree Formation occupying the syntaxis core from the
Precambrian Salkhala Formation in the west. The Salkhala Formation pinches out to
the south of Balakot and is replaced by the Precambrian Hazara Formation. On the
inner side in the syntaxis, although the fault is predominantly lined by the Murree
Formation, but at places, especially between Garhi Habibullah and Balakot, it is the
Muzaffarabad Formation which occupies the faulted contact. Minor slivers of
Paleocene-Eocene carbonate rocks locally intervene between the fault and the
Muzaffarabad Formation.
To the south of Muzaffarabad, much of the continuity of the fault marking the western
margin of the syntaxis runs along the Jhelum River as an upright strike-slip fault.
2.5.2.2.1. Jhelum Fault
Jhelum Fault is a NS oriented upright strike slip fault, marking the southern
continuation of western limb of Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis from Muzaffarabad (Fig.
2.6). As mentioned earlier, it almost runs along the Jhelum River from Muzaffarabad
to Kohala. It separates Precambrian Hazara Formation in the west from the Miocene
molasse sediments of Murree Formation in the east in an area between Muzaffarabad
and Rara, a small village situated near the junction of Kunhar River and Jhelum River.
Further south of Rara village, it demarcates Murree Formation from the dolomites,
quartzites and limestones belonging to Mesozoic Rara Formation (Greco, 1989).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
40/116
27
Fig. 2.6. Steeply dipping Jhelum Fault exposed along River Jhelum between
Muzaffarabad and Kohala.
2.5.3. Tectonic Models for the Origin of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis
1. Wadia (1931) stated that the horst on the Indian plate is responsible for the
formation of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis (HKS). He identified a SSE-ward
transport direction on the western side of the HKS contradicting with a
southwest-ward transport direction on the eastern limb.
2. Calkins et al. (1975) also recognized different transport directions on each
limb of Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis and mentioned that a second, west-directed,
movement direction resulted in the west-vergent shape of the anticlinal
syntaxis.
3. Bossart et al. (1984, 1988) proposed that the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis
developed in response to anticlockwise rotation of the Indian Plate during the
Late Tertiary. According to this model the foreland thrust-fold belt in Pakistan
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
41/116
28
Himalayas developed kink structures with sinisterly slip. Continued rotation
and contraction associated with the Indian-plate underthrusting resulted in
development of the kink-structures into the crustal-scale antiformal fold
structure.
4. Bossart and Ottiger (1990) based on the paleomagnetic studies reviewed
Bossart et al. (1988) model. Their findings suggested that whereas the western
limb did rotate anticlockwise in Tertiary, the eastern limb rather rotated
clockwise, opposite to the rotation of the western limb.
5. Treloar et al. (1992) suggested that Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis developed as a
consequence of interference between two active and converging thrust sheets;
Kashmir Himalayas in the east and Hazara-Pothowar Himalayas in the west.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
42/116
29
CHAPTER 3 (STRATIGRAPHIC SETUP)
STRATIGRAPHY
The study area falls in the domain of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis (HKS) and
exposes rocks of Precambrian age to Recent fluvial deposits. A larger part of the
study area occupies core of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis while a lesser portion
includes area at the western limb of the Syntaxis. The stratigraphy of the area has long
been established by many workers and following is the age-wise division of the
exposed stratigraphy (Table 3.1).
Table 3.1. Table showing the composite stratigraphy of the study area (from Calkins
et al., 1975; Greco, 1989; Greco and Spencer, 1993; Kazmi and Jan, 1997;
Hussain et al., 2004; Kazmi and Abbasi, 2008; Shah, 2009).
Age Formation Lithological Description
Miocene
Kamlial FormationMedium to coarse grained sandstone
interbeded with hard shale andintraformational conglomerate
Murree FormationThick monotonous fluvial sequence ofclay and sandstone with subordinate
intraformational conglomerate
PaleocenePaleocene rocks
(Undivided)
Nodular limestones and calcareousshales with intercalations of marls. 4 mthick coal bed accompanied by Bauxite
soil at the base
Jurassic Rara Formation
Mainly composed of dolomites,quartzites and limestones with
alternating carbonaceous slates and fewsandstone and siltstone layers
Cambrian Muzaffarabad Formation
Stromatolitic limestone and dolomitewith minor conglomerate bed near the base and shale horizon in the middle
part
Precambrian Hazara Formation
Highly deformed Slate, Phyllite andShale with minor occurrences of
Limestone, Graphite, Gypsum andSandstone
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
43/116
30
3.1. PRECAMBRIAN
There is one formation exposed in the study area that belongs to Precambrian age.
3.1.1. Hazara Formation
In the western part of the study area, highly deformed argillaceous rocks, with
intercalations of carbonaceous rocks, are exposed. These rocks belong to Precambrian
Hazara Formation.
Hazara Formation represents Hazara Slate Formation of Marks and Ali (1961),
Slate Series of Hazara of Middlemiss (1896), Hazara Group of Latif (1970) and
Hazara Formation of Calkins et al. (1975) and Greco and Spencer (1993). As the
formation also includes rocks other than slates, the name Hazara Formation is thus
adopted by many workers and is therefore used here in this thesis.
Hazara Formation consists primarily of slate, phyllite and shale. Some minor
occurrences of limestone, graphite, gypsum and sandstone are also found at few
places. Slates and phyllite are rusty brown and dark green on weathered surfaces
while grey to greenish grey or black on the fresh surfaces. Bedding in slate and
phyllite is identifiable at few places and are thin to medium bedded whereas intense
deformation has obliterated the depositional features at most places and hence
bedding is not clear. Shale layers, few centimeters to few feet thick, are present as
precursor lithology where degree of metamorphism is low. Fine to medium grained
and thick bedded Sandstone is also present at some places. Limestone observed near
Charhkapora chowk on Muzaffarabad-Kohala road is thin bedded, internally
laminated, jointed and fractured, yellowish black in color with almost vertical
bedding. Minor folding is also developed and bedding parallel calcite veins are found.
This limestone is non-fossiliferous and micritic. Gypsum is found in a 100 to 400 feet
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
44/116
31
thick zone along with calcareous phyllite (Calkins et al., 1975). The contact of this
zone with the surrounding slates is sharp and probably tectonic in origin (Greco,
1989).
Thickness of the Hazara Formation is not established yet due to two reasons; i)
Hazara Formation is strongly deformed and forms many isoclinals folds., and ii) the
base of the Hazara Formation is not exposed. However, its broad outcrop exposure
means large thickness. Contact of the Hazara Formation in the study area is faulted
with Rara Formation and Murree Formation.
Marks and Ali (1961) categorized the Formation as turbidite deposit but Calkins et al.
(1975) opposed their concept and emphasized that occurrence of limestone, gypsum
and graphite in turbidite sequence is uncertain. According to Calkins et al. (1975),
most of the rock units of Hazara Formation were possibly deposited as shallow-water
argillaceous sequence. Due to the presence of evaporites, Latif (1973) correlated
Hazara Formation with the Salt Range Formation whereas Calkins et al. (1975)
correlated it with Dogra Slates of Kashmir which are overlain by fossiliferous
Cambrian rocks. For this reason, Calkins et al. (1975) gave Precambrian age to the
Hazara Formation. Crawford and Davies (1975), using Rb/Sr method, analyzed three
samples from the Hazara Formation for age determination. Results of the two samples
gave the age of 765 20 million years, while the third one showed the age of 950
20 million years, therefore both these results confirm the age of Hazara Formation as
Precambrian.
3.2. PALEOZOIC
There is one formation exposed in the study area that belongs to Paleozoic age.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
45/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
46/116
33
In the eastern limb of Muzaffarabad anticline, Muzaffarabad Formation is overlain by
Paleocene rocks and the contact is unconformable. Whereas in the western limb,
Muzaffarabad Formation has unconformable contact with Paleocene rocks at some
places, and where Paleocene rocks are missing, it has faulted contact with Murree
Formation. Similarly, where both the Paleocene rocks and Murree Formation are
absent, the Muzaffarabad Formation has faulted contact with the Precambrian Hazara
Formation.
Table 3.2. Table showing the stratigraphic comparison of Muzafarrabad with
Abbottabad and Kotli areas.
Group Formation Member
Quaternary Havelian (Alluvium) (Alluvium) Alluvium
Kamlial Formation SiwalikMurree Formation Murree
KuldanaLora
Margala Hill Limestone
Margalla Hill Limestone
Kuzagali Shale
Paleocene Mari
Limestone Paleocene Rocks
Undivided Patala Formation
chanali limestone
Giumal sandstoneSpiti shale
Sikhar Limestone
Maira
MurreeMiocene
Eocene
Rawalpindi
P e r m
i a n T r
i a s s
i c
Cretaceous
Tarnawai
Muzaffarabad (This Study)
Kotli (Choudhry & Ashraf, 1981)
Thandiani
Hothla
Galis
Rara FormationJurassicJurassic
Abbottabad (Latif 1970 & 1974)Age
Hazira
Galdanian
Muzaffarabad Formation
Abbottabad Group
A b b o
t t a b a
d
Cambrian
P e r m
i a n T r
i a s s
i c
Tarnawai
SirbanMirpur
Mahmda Gali
Sangar GaliTanakki
Precambrian Hazara Hazara Formation Dogra Slates
Muzaffarabad Formation
Abbottabad Group
A b b o
t t a b a
d
CambrianKakul
MBT-Panjal Thrust
Hiatus
Hiatus
Hiatus
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
47/116
34
3.3. MESOZOIC
Mesozoic in the study area is represented by a narrow extension of rocks in a north-
south orientation along Jhelum River. These rocks belong to Rara Formation.
3.3.1. Rara Formation
Greco (1989) used the name Rara Formation for a fault bounded package of rocks
that is sandwiched between Murree Formation and Hazara Formation. He suggested
this new name because of the easily distinguishable nature of constituent lithologies
i.e. the presence of in situ fossiliferous limestone associated with the quartzites,
dolomites and carbonaceous slates near the village of Rara. Wadia (1928) called this
package of rocks as Giumal Series and gave it cretaceous age. Other workers have
classified it as part of the Precambrian Hazara Formation (e.g. Latif, 1970 and Calkins
et al., 1975) or Miocene Murree Formation (e.g. Hussain et al., 2004).
This rock sequence is mainly composed of dolomites, quartzites and limestones with
alternating carbonaceous slates. According to Greco (1989), Rara formation has a
total thickness of 100 m. The lower 50 m of which, separated from the Murree
Formation in the east by Jhelum Fault, is dominantly dolomite and alternating layers
of quartzite with few slates, sandstone and siltstone beds. Dolomite is thickly bedded,
fine grained, light grey on fresh surface and rusty brown on weathered surface where
as quartzite is pure, thinly bedded and white in colour. Similarly, the overlying 50 m
of Rara Formation are composed of thinly bedded, bioclasts-bearing, grey limestone
with alternating carbonaceous slates. These slates exhibit black colour on fresh
surfaces whereas brown on weathered surfaces and are found near the top along with
white quartzites. This upper contact with the Hazara Formation in the west is defined
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
48/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
49/116
36
formations but no one has been able to divide it into individual formations e.g.
Calkins et al. (1975) called these rocks as Kala Chitta Group, Greco (1989) termed
these Paleocene to Eocene Formations, Greco and Spencer (1993) described them
as Paleocene Formations, Arbab and Shah (1996) considered these as Paleocene
and Eocene rocks and called them Patala Formation and Margalla Hills Limestone
(Undifferentiated), Hussain et al. (2004) grouped these rocks as Paleocene Rocks
(Undivided) whereas Iqbal et al. (2004) considered them Early Eocene to
Paleocene and gave the name Patala Formation and Lockhart Limestone
(Undifferentiated). The name Paleocene Rocks (Undivided) of Hussain et al.
(2004) is preferred in this report because most of the people have correlated these
rocks to the Paleocene Lockhart and Patala Formations.
In the investigated area, Paleocene Rocks (Undivided) is represented by a sequence
of grey to dark grey and black limestone and dark-grey shales with intercalations of
marls. The limestone is generally bedded and nodular while shales are calcareous and
the sequence contains abundant Foraminifera (Calkins et al., 1975; Greco and
Spencer, 1993; Hussain et al., 2004). Greco (1989) reported that a 4 meters thick layer
of black, graphitic, coal beds accompanied by bauxite soils is present at the base of
these Paleocene rocks. He also gave a 200 m thickness for this sequence of alternating
silty marls and limestones. In the overturned southwestern limb of Muzaffarabad
anticline, Paleocene nodular limestone is found in patches between Muzaffarabad and
Murree Formations (Greco, 1989). Bossart (1986) gave upper Paleocene age to this
sequence on the basis of abundant macrofossil fauna. He correlated these rocks with
the Lockhart Limestone and Patala Formation of the Kala Chitta Zone (Tahirkheli,
1982).
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
50/116
37
These rocks are marked by an unconformable lower contact with the Cambrian
Muzafarabad Formation and unconformable upper contact with the Murree Formation
(Table 3.2).
3.4.2. Murree Formation
Murree Formation represents the basal part of the Rawalpindi Group of Pinfold
(1918) (Cheema et al., 1977). According to Shah (2009), Murree Formation is the
formal name given by Stratigraphic Committee of Pakistan to Mari Group of
Wynne (1874), Murree Beds of Lydekker (1876) and Murree Series of Pilgrim
(1910).
The Murree Formation is comprised of a thick monotonous fluvial sequence of dark
red and purple clay and red, brown to greenish grey sandstone with subordinate
intraformational conglomerate (Kazmi and Jan, 1997; Kazmi and Abbasi, 2008; Shah,
2009). Beds of calcareous sandy conglomerate in places are intercalated with the
sandstone (Calkins et al., 1975) especially in the basal part of the formation (Shah,
2009). In the mapped area the Murree Formation is exposed to the east of Jhelum
Fault (Fig. 4.6) and is found only in the axial zone of the Hazara Kashmir Syntaxis.
Good exposures of Murree Formation can be found along the road cuts and steep
gorges (Fig. 3.1). The Formation is composed of a large number of fining upward
cycles of deposition, containing sandstones, shales and siltstones. Siltstone is the chief
constituent of the formation and is composed of red and green argillaceous silts. The
sandstone is green, grey and red, moderately sorted, medium to coarse grained, often
cross-and graded-bedded. West dipping sandstone beds of the Murree Formation,
exposed near the junction of Kunhar and Jhelum Rivers, show cross bedding (Fig.
3.2). Younging direction determined from these cross beds indicate that the beds have
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
51/116
38
been overturned at this location. At some places, the sandstone is jointed (Fig. 3.3a)
and containing sole marks (Fig. 3.3b). The sandstone beds are characterized by
channel lag breccia (Fig. 3.4) usually at the base of sandstone bodies. (Kazmi and
Abbasi, 2008).
Fig. 3.1. Murree sandstone exposed along gorge sides near location 6.
Fig. 3.2. Cross beds in Murree sandstone near Kunhar-Jhelum Rivers Junction.
Stratigraphic younging direction is indicated by word Up. Photo taken
looking towards S60E.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
52/116
39
Fig. 3.3. (a) Grey jointed sandstone of Murree Formation exposed along road side. (b)
Sole marks in Murree sandstone present at the lower face of the exposed
bed.
Fig. 3.4. Channel lag breccia and overlying grey sandstone of Murree Formation.
The exact thickness of the Murree Formation at the study area is undecided because of
intense folding (Fig. 3.1). East of Lachi Khan, some 8 miles north of Muzaffarabad,
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
53/116
40
5,000 feet (1524 m) thick, undisturbed section of Murree Formation is exposed
(Calkins et al., 1975). In the study area, the formation is lying unconformably on top
of Peleocene rocks (Undivided). Its upper contact is transitional with the Kamlial
Formation.
Based on the presence of nummulitic-bearing limestone as intercalation with the
sandstone and shale, Bossart and Ottiger (1989) have assigned Eocene age to these
sediments and named them Balakot Formation. Najman et al. (2001, 2002)
however, showed that the molasses sediments had detrital micas with K/Ar ages as
young as Miocene, which annulled the possibility of Eocene age for these sediments.
They also showed that the limestone bands are not depositional intercalations but are
tectonically incorporated with the molasses sediments. Murree Formation is poorly
fossiliferous and only few plant remains, silicified wood, fish remains, frog and
mammalian bones have been recorded (Kazmi and Jan, 1997; Shah, 2009). This fauna
indicates an Early Miocene age for the Murree Formation.
3.4.3. Kamlial Formation
Stratigraphic Committee of Pakistan has given the name Kamlial Formation to the
Kamlial beds of Pinfold (1918) and Kamlial stage of Pascoe (1964). Wynne
(1874, 1877) described the Kamlial Formation as part of the Mari Group which is
now days called Murree Formation. Several people have shown the Kamlial
Formation as a part of Murree Formation including Wadia (1928), Calkins et al.
(1975), Greco (1989), Greco and Spencer (1993) and Arbab and Shah (1996).
However, Iqbal et al. (2004) and Akhtar et al. (2004) have differentiated it from the
Murree Formation in geological maps of the area prepared for the Geological Survey
of Pakistan.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
54/116
41
The Formation is comprised of medium to coarse grained purple-grey and dark brick-
red sandstone interbeded with hard purple shale and yellow and purple
intraformational conglomerate (Iqbal et al., 2004; Shah, 2009). Kazmi and Abbasi
(2008) have classified the Kamlial Formation as 75% of the formation is sandstone,
20% is siltstone and 5% is intraformational conglomerate. It contains high amount of
intraformational conglomerate usually at the base of large sandstone bodies. The
sandstone is fine to medium grained, cross-bedded and intercalated with lenses of
intraformational conglomerate or thin layers of clay. Sandstone of Kamlial Formation
is distinguished from the sandstone of underlying Murree Formation by its usually
spheroidal weathering, abundance of tourmaline and lack of epidote which is
abundantly present in Murree sandstone (Shah, 2009).
The thickness of the Kamlial Formation is not exactly known in the study area. It is
650 m thick at Soan Gorge, 580 m at Khaur, 90 m at Kamlial, and 60 m at Ling River
near Rawalpindi whereas its thickness in the subsurface is 150 m at Pamal Domeli,
100 m at Balkasar and 180 m at Jhatla (Shah, 2009). Lower contact of the Kamlial
Formation with Murree Formation is broadly transitional whereas its upper contact in
the study area is not exposed but elsewhere with the Chinji Formation, of Siwalik
Group, is conformable. A number of mammalian fossils have been reported from the
Kamlial Formation and on the basis of this fauna the formation is given the middle
Miocene age (Kazmi and Abbasi, 2008; Shah, 2009). Johnson et al. (1985) also
reported middle Miocene age for the Kamlial Formation when he carried out the
Paleomagnetic dating of a section in Gabir River near Chinji Village in Talagang
District. His results gave 18.3 million years to 14.3 million years age for the Kamlial
Formation which means middle Miocene age.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
55/116
42
CHAPTER 4 (STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY)
INTRODUCTION
Structure of the study area shows variations in size and style. It is dominated by the
HazaraKashmir Syntaxis, which is a fold structure formed by the Main Boundary
Thrust (MBT) having Tertiary clastics of Murree Formation in its footwall (Calkins et
al., 1975; Greco and Spencer, 1993; Arbab and Shah, 1996). Other rocks exposed
within the syntaxis include dolomites and siliclastics of the Cambrian Muzaffarabad
Formation, Paleocene Lockhart Limestone and shales of the Paleocene aged Patala
Formation. Structurally, the Precambrian metasedimentary rock sequence of the
Hazara and Tanawal Formations and the Cambrian Mansehra Granite form the
hanging wall of MBT (Owen et al., 2008).
4.1. MAJOR STRUCTURES
There are numerous faults and folds in the study area ranging in size from centimeter
scale to tens of kilometers. It is very difficult to describe every single structure, so
here only major structures are discussed in details.
4.1.1. Jhelum Fault
To the south of Muzaffarabad, two major fault structures bifurcate from the Balakot
Shear Zone; 1) the Jhelum Fault, which marks the southern continuation of the
western limb of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis and 2) the Muzaffarabad Thrust, which
traverses obliquely through the core of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis along the Upper
Jhelum River. As far as the Jhelum Fault is concerned, it mostly follows the western
bank of the Jhelum River between Muzaffarabad and Kohala.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
56/116
43
The Jhelum Fault has a general N-S orientation from Muzaffarabad to Kohala running
almost parallel to the Jhelum River, where it separates the Murree Formation in east
from the Hazara and Rara Formations in the west. Another notable feature of the
Jhelum Fault is the topographic difference across its strike. Murree Formation
consisting of sandstones, shales and clays is susceptible to erosion as compared to the
metasediments of Hazara Formation which are harder. Hence slates of the Hazara
Formation form high relief mountains on the western side of the Jhelum Fault as
compared to the Murree Formation forming low relief topography on the eastern side
(Fig. 4.1). It exhibits a left-lateral strike slip sense of motion and is upright to steeply
dipping towards East (Fig. 4.2).
Fig. 4.1. Difference in relief across Jhelum Fault (JF); Murree Formation (left)
forming low relief while Hazara Formation (right) forming high relief
topography.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
57/116
44
Fig. 4.2. Steeply dipping fault plane of Jhelum Fault exposed along the left bank of
Jhelum River between Muzaffarabad and Kohala and its equal area
stereographic projection (Location 4, Fig. 4.6).
After crossing Chathar area in Muzaffarabad, Jhelum Fault runs parallel to the JhelumRiver in N-S direction and exhibits a sharp contact at most of its exposures (Fig. 4.3,
Location 1). At Location 2 (Fig. 4.6), it crosses the Kunhar River near the Rara
village where the fault plane is almost vertical (Fig. 4.4). To the further south, for
about 1-2 Kilometres, Jhelum Fault runs through channel of the River Jhelum in
summer season and may get exposed at its left bank in winters due to low level of
water flow (Fig. 4.5). Southward it runs on the right bank of River Jhelum.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
58/116
45
Fig. 4.3. Sharp contact (Jhelum Fault)
between Murree Formation
and Hazara Formation
exposed along the
Muzaffarabad-Kohala road at
location 1 (Fig. 4.6).
Fig. 4.4. Jhelum Fault crossing the
Kunhar River, close to its
junction with the Jhelum River
near the Rara village and its
stereographic projection
(Location 2, Fig. 4.6).
Fig. 4.5. Jhelum Fault exposed at left bank of Jhelum River due to low level of water
flow in winter. For scale, arrow shows two persons standing on outcrop of
Hazara Formation.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
59/116
46
4.1.2. Muzaffarabad Thrust
After separation from the western limb of Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis, Muzaffarabad
Thrust passes through interior of the Hazara-Kashmir Syntaxis having NW-SE
orientation along the Upper Jhelum River (Fig. 4.6). The Muzaffarabad Thrust has
emerged at the surface over a distance of ~100 km with an earthquake of 7.6
magnitude in 2005 proving its seismically active nature (Singh et al., 2006). The trace
of the thrust occupies northern bank of the Upper Jhelum River from Muzaffarabad
up to the village Naushahra. The trace crosses the river at Dhallian, passes through the
Siran village and follows the Baghsar Katha towards Chikar.
The vergence of the anticline towards southwest suggests an inherited steepness of the
upright to overturned western limb, which in essence is a thrust fault, most
appropriately can be termed as the Muzaffarabad Thrust (Calkins et al., 1975). It
marks the western contact of the Muzaffarabad Formation with the Murree Formation
at the western limb of the Muzaffarabad anticline. It dips at 25 o-50 o towards NE and is
exposed immediately east of Muzaffarabad. Muzaffarabad Thrust is refolded along
the Neelum River near Nisar camp area, before it extends towards the Balakot in the
NW, where it joins MBT and Panjal Thrust at the western limb of the Hazara-
Kashmir Syntaxis.
To the southeast, the Muzaffarabad Thrust was previously not mapped beyond the
termination of exposures of the Muzaffarabad Formation. Nakata et al. (1991) did
show an active fault along the upper Jhelum River between Muzaffarabad and Garhi
Dopatta, which he termed as the Tanda Fault. The 2005 Kashmir Earthquake ruptured
the Muzaffarabad Thrust along with its southeastern extension (Tanda Fault) between
Balakot in the NW to Bagh in the SE, thus establishing the existence of a major thrust
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
60/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
61/116
48
Indian Kashmir. In doing so, these authors named this fault as the Kashmir Boundary
Thrust. In some regional maps, the Himalayan Frontal Thrust exposed in Indian
Himalayas (Kashmir and to the east) has been tentatively extended to NW and is
joined with the Muzaffarabad Thrust. A careful survey of the literature shows that
neither the Raisi Thrust joins the Muzaffarabad Thrust nor does the Main Himalayan
Thrust. Tapponier et al. (2006) used the name Jhelum Thrust for Muzaffarabad
Thrust, but it confuses with Jhelum Fault which is altogether a different structure.
Since the name Muzaffarabad Thrust is previously used for this structure in literature
(e.g., Calkins et al., 1975), and the Muzaffarabad city was most devastated by
rupturing of this thrust in 2005 Kashmir Earthquake, I preferred to retain the name
Muzaffarabad Thrust for this structure.
4.1.3. Nathiagali Thrust
On a regional scale, the Himalayas have been divided into internal (or hinterland) and
external (or foreland) zones (Coward et al., 1988). MMT marks the northern limit of
the internal zone which comprises of crystalline rocks of Naran, Upper Kashmir,
Upper Hazara, Besham and Swat (Fig. 2.1). The external zone, which is a type of
foreland thrust-fold belt, is comprised of successions of stratified rocks of Hill Ranges
(e.g., Kohat, Kalachitta, and Margala), the Salt Ranges-Trans-Indus Ranges and
Potwar-Kohat plateau. The tectonic boundary between the northern internal and
southern external zones is demarcated by The Nathiagalli-Khairabad Thrust.
Nathiagali Thrust branches off towards the western side from the Jhelum Fault near
the village of Rara which is situated some 5 kilometers south of Muzaffarabad along
Muzaffarabad-Kohala road (Greco and Spencer, 1993). From Rara it almost runs
parallel to the Jhelum Fault in North-South direction separating Hazara Formation
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
62/116
49
from the Rara Formation. The Rara-Kohala segment of the Nathiagali Thrust exhibits
strike slip behavior. Near Kohala, Nathiagali Thrust takes turn along the Bakot Nala
and runs towards southwest direction where it thrusts the Precambrian slates over the
Mesozoic formations and upto Tertiary Kuldana Formation (Burg et al., 2005).
4.1.4. Muzaffarabad Anticline
The Muzaffarabad Anticline can be visualized as a large doubly plunging southwest-
verging anticline covering the overall core area of HKS, especially in its northern
part, north of the Jhelum River. Muzaffarabad Anticline is characterized by a well
developed NE limb and a highly tectonized and attenuated SW limb. The core of this
structure is exposed near Muzaffarabad, and hence the structure is appropriately
named as the Muzaffarabad Anticline (Calkins et al., 1975; Bossart et al., 1984;
Hussain et al., 2004). Bossart et al. (1984) showed that the fold axis of the
Muzaffarabad anticline passes NE of Muzaffarabad and plunges to the NW near
Balakot. To the south, the fold axis runs parallel to the upper Jhelum River through
Garhi Dopatta towards Chikar and Bagh further to the southeast. As mentioned above,
the mega anticlinal structure is highly tectonized at its SW limb due to its involvement
in the active faulting including the Panjal Thrust and the MBT, marking the western
limb of the syntaxis. Especially between Muzaffarabad and Balakot, the SW limb of
this anticline is truncated obliquely by the Panjal-MBT faults resulting in the
beheading of the NW plunging axis of the Muzaffarabad anticline.
Core of this doubly plunging anticline exposes the Cambrian carbonates in a 30 km
long stretch between Muzaffarabad and Balakot. In the eastern limb of the anticline,
there is another set of carbonate rocks of Paleocene age immediately overlying the
Muzaffarabad Formation. These carbonates are marked by unconformable lower
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
63/116
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
64/116
51
northwestern parts of the study area, close to Jhelum Fault in the west and its junction
with Muzaffarabad anticline in the north, have experienced two phases of fold
formation (Fig. 4.7).
There is a large syncline present in the lower core area of the Hazara-Kashmir
Syntaxis (Fig. 4.6), having its axis parallel to both upper Jhelum river and
Muzaffarabad Thrust i.e. SE-NW. It is an open syncline with its limbs dipping at
about 30-55 towards each other. Its eastern limb is cut by Muzaffarabad Thrust near
Chikar khas area. This syncline exposes the younger rocks of Kamlial Formation in its
core. There is another syncline in the southern parts of the study area near Kohala,
where too, Kamlial Formation is exposed in the core. Its axis is oriented in N-NNW
direction, parallel to lower Jhelum River and Jhelum Fault.
There are several other small scale anticlines and synclines exposed alternatively
throughout the study area. One such series of small scale anticlines and synclines is
exposed along a tributary of Agar Nala near Nurpur village having their fold axis
oriented in NW-SE direction. Hence it shows that these folds are formed due to the
effect of NE-SW shortening. Such folds are also present in an area between
Muzaffarabad and Rara village to the east of and adjacent to Jhelum Fault which are
oriented in NS and NE direction. Some outcrop scale faults were also observed in the
area (Fig. 4.8). Figure 4.8 shows a low angle thrust fault, observed at Location 3,
cutting through the limb of a fold in Hazara formation. Attitude of both this fold and
fault is in complete accordance with the stresses direction responsible for the
movement of Jhelum Fault, left lateral strike slip fault, because Hazara formation
would have moved southwards relative to core of HKS, thus resulting in north-
dipping low angle thrust fault and the associated fold.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
65/116
52
Fig. 4.7. Structural map of the study area showing two phases of structures
formation. Structural trend of the area is determined from results of this
study, Greco (1989) and Published GSP maps.
8/10/2019 Syed Ali Turab M.phil Thesis
66/116
53
Fig. 4.8. Fold and Thrust fault in Hazara Formation at Location 3. Equal area, great
circle plots of both bedding plane and fault plane are given at the top
corners.
Two different structural domains are identified in the study area based on the
published data of Geological Survey of Pakistan (GSP) which was analyzed in
StereoWin 1.2, a software by Richard W. Allmendinger for plotting and analyzing
structural data. For this purpose, only the data lying between Muzaffarabad Thrust
and Jhelum Fault was taken to study the effect of both these structures on this data. A
total of 109 Strike orientations of beddings were first calculated using Global Mapper
8.03 software from the published GSP maps (43 F/7, 43 F/11 and 43 F/12). These
orientations were then plotted on stereonet for further analysis and hence two domains
were recognized.
Domain 1 shows less concentrated data and bedding planes are of wide range of strike
and dip values (Fig. 4.9).