Technology and Greater Sage-grouse Conservation Responding to the Conservation – Responding to the ThreatsThomas ClaysonOctobe 9 2009October 9, 2009
Objectivej
•Demonstrate Technologies That Aid in Conserving Greater Sage-grouse Habitats Greater Sage-grouse Habitats
Wyoming Case Study
2October 15, 2009
Background Informationg
•Western State’s Land Ownership & Major Producing Basins in the Greater Sage-grouse’s HabitatsBasins in the Greater Sage-grouse s Habitats
•Status of Greater Sage-grouse Petition for Listing Under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Changing g p ( ) g gRegulatory Environment
Federal Land Management of Greater Sage-grouseBureau of Land Management (BLM) Special Status Species Management
Wyoming’s Greater Sage-grouse Habitat Mgt Approach
•Technologies or Best Management Practices
3October 15, 2009
Western Federal Land Ownershipp
State Surface % of State
NV 84.5
UT 57.4
OR 53 1OR 53.1
ID 50.2
AZ 48.1
CA 45.3
WY 42.3
NM 41 8NM 41.8
CO 36.6
WA 30.3
4October 15, 2009
MT 29.9
Greater Sage-grouseg g
5October 15, 2009
Greater Sage-grouse Habitat (USGS)g g ( )
6October 15, 2009
Major Western Producing Basinsj g
MajorProducingBasin
7October 15, 2009
Greater Sage-grouse Status - ESAg g
•Prior to 2005 Numerous Petitions to list Greater-sage Grouse Submitted to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)( )
•USFWS 2005 Decision “Not Warranted”
Federal agencies responsible for managing 66% of sagebrush l dlandscape
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) responsible for management of majority of those lands (46%)
R i d t f th tReview and assessment of threatsOil and gas development
Strong focus on BLM resource management
•Judge Winmill Decision – Idaho Federal District Court 2007
Remanded decision back to USFWS for reconsideration
USFW will issue new listing decision early 2010
8October 15, 2009
•USFW will issue new listing decision early 2010
BLM Management for Greater Sage-Grouseg g
•Special Status Species Management Policy (6840 Manual)
ESA Listed SpeciesESA - Listed Species
ESA - Candidate Species
ESA - Proposed for ListingESA Proposed for Listing
Identified by a State requiring special management
Identified by the BLM State Director
•Endangered or Threatened Species – Management for Recovery
•All other – Conservation to prevent listing
9October 15, 2009
BLM Management Strategiesg g
•Established Permitting Conditions – Point Radii Management
One Quarter (1/4) mile NSO from a lek (strutting)One Quarter (1/4) mile NSO from a lek (strutting)Prevent disturbance that may affect leking activity
2 mile seasonal no surface disturbing activities (March 1 to June 15)
Prevent disturbance in nesting and brood rearing habitats
Siting - Locating infrastructure to minimize impactg g p
Daily timing restrictions – no post dawn and pre sunset travel
R d ti f i t t tiReduction of noise at compressor stations
10October 15, 2009
BLM Management Strategiesg g
•Evolving Permitting Conditions
Limits on well site visitation
Habitat based management rather than point radii
Limitation on surface disturbing activities during critical Limitation on surface disturbing activities during critical periods => 4 mi.
Limits on well pad densities
Seasonal “No Surface Disturbing Activities” Restrictions in Winter Concentration Areas
11October 15, 2009
State of Wyoming Sage-grouse ManagementManagement
•State of Wyoming Executive Order Oil and Gas Management Stipulations(2008)Management Stipulations(2008)
One well pad per 640 acres. No more than 11 well pads within 1.9 miles of the perimeter of occupied sage grouse leks with densities not to exceed 1 pad per 640 acres. Clustering of well pads may be considered and approved on a case-by-case basispp y
Surface disturbance will be limited to < 5% of sagebrush habitat per 640 acres.
12October 15, 2009
State of Wyoming Sage-grouse ManagementManagement
Limitation on disturbance may be considered and approved on a case-by-case basis.pp yNo Surface Occupancy (NSO) within 0.6 mi of the perimeter of occupied sage grouse leks
P li N t Li it d t Oil d G•Policy Not Limited to Oil and GasWind, Mining, etc.
•Demonstration to USFWS that Wyoming is Taking a •Demonstration to USFWS that Wyoming is Taking a Proactive and Leadership Role in Greater Sage-grouse Conservation
C id i i li i d i iConsideration in listing decisionEnsure both Sage-grouse and the state’s economy base is protected.
13October 15, 2009
p
Wyoming Core Areasy g
14October 15, 2009
Wyoming Game and Fish Dept Management Recommendations Outside Core AreaRecommendations Outside Core Area
•Recommendations for Development of Oil and Gas Resources within Important Wildlife Habitats (2009)Resources within Important Wildlife Habitats (2009)
No surface occupancy (NSO) within 1/4 mile of the perimeter of each lek. Thresholds and mitigation apply to all development within 2 miles of a lek, and within identified nesting/brood-rearing habitats > 2 miles from a lek. In addition, seasonal use restrictions should apply to leks at all impact thresholds.
Greater than 3 well pad locations should be avoided to the extent practicablep
15October 15, 2009
Identified Interactions of Concern for Oil and Gas Development and Greater Sage-grouseDevelopment and Greater Sage-grouse
•Habitat loss
Surface disturbance
Invasive species
N i•Noise
Compressors and other facilities
O h d St t•Overhead Structures
Power lines, towers, etc.
T ffi•Traffic
Volume, timing, frequency
16October 15, 2009
Technology Solutionsgy
•All Oil and Gas Fields not Created Equal
ConsiderationsTechnically feasibility
EconomicsEconomics
•All Greater Sage-grouse Habitat not Created Equal
ConsiderationsHigh Quality Habitats Utilized
High Quality Habitat not Utilized
M i l H bit t Utili dMarginal Habitats Utilized
Marginal Habitats not Utilized
17October 15, 2009
Technology Solutionsgy
•Bottom LineConsiderations Must Be BalancedConsiderations Must Be Balanced
Energy productionSocialE i t lEnvironmentalEconomic
Shared GoalsReduced Surface Disturbance
Construction and Reclamation Costs ReducedReduction in Temporary Habitat Loss
Reduced TrafficReduced TrafficWell Site and Facility Visits Cost $$$Reduction Interaction with Wildlife
Increased Operational Efficiency
18October 15, 2009
Drill and Complete Wells Quicker
Technology Solutionsgy
•Environmentally Friendly Drilling Systems (EFD)
“To integrate advanced technologies into a drilling rig system that significantly reduces the environmental impact of petroleum drilling and production” (Houston Advanced Research Center)
Anadarko Petroleum and partners are incorporating dual engineering and environmental research programs dual engineering and environmental research programs specifically to reduce the environmental impacts on ecologically sensitive areas from extraction activities
Transportation
Drilling
Production and Completion Systems
19October 15, 2009
Applied Technologiespp g
•Directional Drillingd d & d Reduces road & pad construction
Related dust and emissions
Reduces road network
Reduces truck traffic dust and emissions
20October 15, 2009
Applied Technologies
•Telemetry & Well AutomationRed ction in Vehicle TrafficReduction in Vehicle Traffic
21October 15, 2009
Applied Technologies
•Off-site Centralization of Production and Liquids Gathering Systems
Reduces Vehicle TrafficCan Site Facilities Near High Volume Roads
22October 15, 2009 22
Applied Technologies
• Centralized Fracturing FarmsReduction in Vehicle TrafficReduced Surface Disturbance
23October 15, 2009
Applied Technologies
•Burying Lines & UtilitiesReduction in Surface DisturbanceReduction in Surface DisturbanceFaster Reclamation
Plow mark
24October 15, 2009
Applied Technologies
•Utilization of Noise Reduction
25October 15, 2009
Applied Technologies pp g
•Rotary – Steerable Drills
Reduced Drilling Timeframes
•Fit for Purpose Rigs
R d d S f Di bReduced Surface Disturbance
Reduced Drilling Timeframes
I d S f tIncreased Safety
•3D Seismic
C Eli i t U W llCan Eliminate Unnecessary Wells
26October 15, 2009
Applied Best Management Practicespp g
•Industry Applied Strategies Conserving Sage-grouse and Their Habitat
http://www.pawyo.org/html/management.htmAdministrative – RegulatoryAdministrative – Internal to OperatorpPlanningHabitat MappingReclamationReclamationDrillingOperationsProduced Water ManagementMonitoring; andCommunication and Cooperation
27October 15, 2009
p
Conclusions
•New Technologies Must Play a Role
Meet Future Energy DemandsContinue to Explore and Operate in Sensitive Environments
Continue to Safeguard the Environment in All AreasContinue to Safeguard the Environment in All Areas
•Their Application Must Be
Proven to be Effective in Reducing Environmental gImpacts
Balanced with Economic, Social and Environmental CostsCosts
Be Technically Feasible
• They All Do Not Need to Be Elegant
28October 15, 2009
• They All Do Not Need to Be Elegant