8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
1/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
Who or what decides upon an artists fate? Pierre Bourdieu, Pierre Michon
and the theory of the literary field [slide 1]
1. Introduction [slide 2]
Let me first introduce the subject of todays class by explaining why I have
chosen Pierre Michons short stories about Lorentino and Joseph Roulin as an
illustration of ourdieus theory of the mar!et of symbolic goods"
#irst of all because of the theme of this course"ourdieus theories have had $
and perhaps still have $ great influence in #rance when it comes to what he callsthe distribution of cultural capital in society% the role education plays in it% and
the way all forms of art &literature% painting' are affected by it" (hese ideas suit
perfectly with the theme of this course% literature and society" )ne of ourdieus
main wor!s isLa Distinction&*+,+- translated in *+./ asDistinction'- in this he
discusses the genesis of social relationships and examines the lifestyle of
#rances class structure" 0s you can read in the footnote at page *1% the articleyou have read for today is at the basis ofDistinction"
(he second reason is my own research project that focuses on the revival of the
painters novel" 2e will see that the way painters are portrayed in this !ind of
novel has a social dimension and the short stories written by Michon are good
examples of this"
I will start with a brief summary of the history and characteristics of the
painters novel% then we will discuss the theory of ourdieu and analyse the two
short stories"
2. he painters no!el
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13*
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
2/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
(he painters novel $ specialist disagree on the 3uestion whether it is a genre or
not $ was% at least in #rance% very popular in the nineteenth century% but
gradually disappeared at the beginning of the twentieth century" (he last
twenty4thirty years however% it is bac!% in #rance but also in the 5etherlands"
Rather surprisingly% we see artists not only in what is commonly called 6high
literature but also in 6low literature e"g" the detective novel" (he classic
example here is of course 7an rowns The Da Vinci code"
0 painters novel could be defined as follows8 a text in prose in which the
protagonist is a painter and in which visual art and aesthetics are discussed%either directly $ in the conversations the painter has with his friends and fellow
artists $ or indirectly $ e"g" by means of e!phrasis% the description of paintings
by the narrator $" 2hen we loo! at the way painters are portrayed in these
novels% we find a series of topoi% literary commonplaces" Roughly spea!ing% the
artist is [slide "]
eitheran inspired genius% misunderstood and socially marginali9ed-struggling for recognition% rebelling against the prescriptions of the 0cademy
of 0rt% living in an old and empty garret : and in this portrait we can clearly
see the influence of Romanticism &the first half of the century'
or a successful artist% socially compliant% who follows the aesthetic rules set
by the 0cademy and lives in a mansion- sometimes he is even a shrewd
businessman who capitali9es on the 6taste of the public% that is to say thebourgeois : that is how the painters novel expresses the commerciali9ation
of art in the second half of the century
0s you can see these literary commonplaces have a social dimension $ I will
come bac! on that later% while discussing ourdieu"
5ear the end of the *+
th
century the painters novel faded away% but the lasttwenty4thirty years we see it coming bac!% not only in #rance &perhaps you have
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13;
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
3/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
heard of Michel
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
4/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
going on in art and4or literature" (his is all the more interesting because
contemporary writers seem to revert to the same &social' commonplaces in the
portraits they s!etch of their painters" ourdieus theory of the literary4artistic
field could contribute to answering these 3uestions8 e"g" there might be analogies
between the literary4artistic field in the *+thcentury and the contemporary
literary4artistic field"
: return to realism- competition with other media &photography4film- 4computer
and video art' : leads to discussion among artists
)f course% we cannot discuss all the aspects of the revival of the painters novelin two hours- what I want to do is *' s!etch% explain and discuss in broad outline
the article you have read $ that will be necessary% I suppose $ and see the lin!s
with my research and ;' read the short stories in the light of ourdieus theory8
a' what can we say about the reasons Lorentino never became a famous painter-
b' why has Michon chosen himC c' why does he show us Dan Aogh through the
eyes of his postmanC
". Bourdieu
0s you probably !now ourdieu has had a great influence on teachers%
intellectuals and political activists in #rance% most certainly because of the fact
that his notions of fields% class% power relations and symbolic goods can explain
the failure of the ideal of 6education for everyone% which was one of the goals
of the students insurrections in the late *+EFs" In his main wor!La
Distinction!Distinction&*+,+4*+./'% ourdieu discusses the origin of social
relationships% examines the lifestyle of #rances social classes and analyses the
#rench educational system% which is still very hierarchic" (he places to be are
not the universities% but the 6grandes Gcoles to which a 6concours $ a
comparative exam $ is the only access8 every year there is a limited number of
places and only the best students are admitted" 0nd the selection is the same
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13/
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
5/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
after graduation8 those who have the highest mar!s obtain the best jobs% e"g" at a
prestigious 6lycGe in Paris and not somewhere in the country% 6la #rance
profonde- or when you loo! at political life there is an old boys networ! of
6Gnar3ues% former students of the Hcole 5ationale de l0dministration &they are
M0' " ourdieu ma!es it clear that the best and most successful students are
those who are the richest in terms of symbolic capital% in other words8 those who
come from families where &literary' culture is important"
ourdieus approach of art and culture is that of a sociologist% which means the
focus is on the world of art more than on the wor! of art for itself8*
he examines *' the way individual artists and groups of artists interact8
collaboration% mutual exclusion% conflicts and competition and ;' the way
their world &the artistic field4field of cultural production' is organised-
his aim is to discover the characteristics of the field% the patterns you can
discover% the way it functions and decides upon reputations and careers8 he
3uestion he as!s for instance is whether the avantBgarde can liberate art fromfixed &that is to say bourgeois' social structures and if so% howC
(his approach of art implies the end of the romantic concept of genius% one of
the commonplaces4topoi we have seen8
the wor! of art is no longer considered as the result of asupernatural gift-
artists and art are mereproducts of their time-
wor!s of art function insocial configurations&institutions' that determine
their reputation8 art academies% art criticism% museums% grant providers- these
configurations are intertwined with other social institutions
: this means that art is not a mystery but a social construction- the artist is an
actor in a social field of influence" 0nd that brings us to (he mar!et of
1This part of the lecture has been taken from Ton Bevers, Kunst, geschiedenis en sociologie, in: KittyZilmans en !arlite "albertsma, Gezichtspunten. Een inleiding in de methoden van de kunstgeschiedenis,
#imegen, $%#, 1&&', pp()*1+)-, 1&&'(
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
6/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
symbolic goodsK : a little difficult to read- the argumentation often is
repetitive"
#. he &ar'et of sy&(olic )oods
4.1. The logic of the process of autonomization
ourdieu first explains how art or% to put it correctly% the field of cultural
production% became autonomous" 0s I said before% the notion of field is central
to his theory- let us see what it means [slide *]8
#ield &economic% educational% political% cultural' a structured space with its
own laws of functioning and its own power relations independent of those ofpolitics and economy : that is how the emancipation4liberation of the
artistic4literary field too! place8 for centuries% nobility and church determined
the cultural production"
ut8 even though each field is relatively autonomous% it is structurally
homologous with the others8 ourdieu uses the word 6correlation here"
Its structure is determined by the positions agents occupy in the field% so
there is always a competition going on between these agents for control of
the interests or resources that are specific to the field in 3uestion and can give
them authority" In the case of the field of cultural production% interests and
resources are not material- its capital is symbolic the authority inherent in
recognition% consecration and prestige that gives the artist symbolic power%
that is to say8 power not reducible to economic capital" 0 field is a social universe with its own laws of functioning8 external
determinants can have an effect only through transformations in the structure
of the field itself : that is the evolution ourdieu s!etches in the first
chapter of the article8 four main reasons &p" */'% three periods &p" *- the %irst
,ein+ the uattro cento the "eriod in )hich the story a,out Lorentino
ta/es "lace' in which we see a complete revolution of the artistic field%
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13E
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
7/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
because power relations are changing8 professional artists and intellectuals no
longer accept rules coming from others &church% academies% politics' and this
autonomy transforms the relations between artists and between artists and
nonBartists"
(he conse3uences of this growing autonomy are8 *' the creation of a divide
between artBasBcommodity and artBasBpure symbolism &pure art'- between the
field of large scale production LP' where cultural goods are produced for
nonBproducers of cultural goods% for the public at large- and the field of
restricted production RP' where cultural goods are produced for other
producers of cultural goods &cultural elite' - ;' the artist is submitted to thelaws of the mar!et of symbolic goods% although he might thin! he is
completely free"
:
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
8/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
the doxa &the reigning rules'" (herefore they are bound to disconcert the
orthodox by their 6obscurity and 6pointlessness and they will have to defend
their own positions"
: there is a permanent search for originality in matters of aesthetics- a
permanent search for distinction socioBcultural differentiation% for being
uni3ue"
: artists do so especially by using new stylistic and technical principles8 in
painting&from realism to impressionism to 3uestioning painting itself' and in
literature &from realism to the modernist and postmodernist novel% the latter
showing overtly its structure e"g" with the commentary of the narrator brea!ingthe suspension of disbelief : there are no references to external demands% hence
no acceptance outside the field'"
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
9/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
ou might wonder why the field of restricted production does not disappear%
since it is separate from the public at large" In chapter 1 ourdieu explains how
that is possible $ the main factor being the role of the educational system"
2hereas inthe field of largeBscale cultural production consumption is
independent of educational level% in the field of restricted cultural production%
consumption and educational level are closely related" (his is because in the
field of restricted production% consumption is related to aesthetic disposition and
the mastery of the codes"
(he field of restricted production can only function because of the existence of8
B the institutions that conserve the capital of symbolic goodsB the institutions that reproduce agents capable of understanding the code
ou could say that these institutions $ academies% museums and the educational
system create a system that maintains itself &p" ;/' because they
B have the power to grant cultural consecration
B reproduce producers of a specific type of cultural goods% the corresponding
consumers% the consecration authorities necessary for this type of wor!% acultivated public and the agents of legitimi9ation or canoni9ation"
0nd then ourdieu signals a paradox when it comes to innovation" Innovation
means that the field has to be receptive to new ideas8 a new definition of wor! of
art% new aesthetics% new values about production and distribution and the
formation of new networ!s to spread the new ideas" ut at that point the field of
restricted production finds itself in opposition with the institutions whose
mission is conservation &page ;E% he distinguishes between avantBgarde%
academies4museums and the educational system- between intellectual culture
and scholastic culture'"
: paradox or at least ambivalence8 with their innovations% producers in the field
of restricted production challenge $ conservative $ educational authorities but
they are dependent upon them for recognition" ourdieu observes that the liberty
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13+
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
10/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
they ta!e depends upon their social status8 intellectual functionaries &petitB
bourgeois' and independent artist4intellectual &bourgeois' both have a
subservient position% but those who come from the 6petite bourgeoisie are most
directly under the control of the state because they are dependent on grants"
0nyway% it is clear that school functions li!e a filter8 it reinforces successfully
those who already possess the attitudes and aptitudes of the cultivated classes $
who master the code of interpretation% !now the rules of the game $ and it
refuses those who do not have these 3ualifications" (his means that education
leads to reproduction of the culture of the dominant group% it reproduces thehierarchy of the social world &good example of correlation'8 education reinforces
and consecrates the ine3ualities instead of diminishing them" (his is where we
find the notion of 6habitus8
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
11/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
0part from the art produced in the field of restricted production% there is also
middleBbrow4average art% the product of the system of large scale production"
ourdieu discusses it in chapter / and he observes that8
B in contrast to the 6high culture where artists wor! for their fellow artists and
where innovation is the only means of survival% middleBbrow art obeys the
imperatives of competition for con3uest of the mar!et-
B in contrast to the 6high culture where the wor!s create their public% in middleB
brow art wor!s are entirely defined by their public &highest social denominator-
average spectator'-
B in contrast to the 6high culture that cherishes the cult of form for its own sa!e&out of devotion to art for its own sa!e'% middleBbrow art searches for effect8
because of its submission to the mar!et- the artists are cautious and use only
tried and proven techni3ues-
B in contrast to 6high culture that is autonomous% middleBbrow art is
heteronomous% that is to say dependent on the mar!et"
(hese differences% according to ourdieu% lead to a very une3ual power of
distinctionK &p" 1*'- middleBbrow culture has to define itself in relation to
legitimate cultureK &p" 1;'" (he practitioners of middleBbrow art% in the margins
of legitimi9ed art% find themselves in an ambivalent position8 they attac! what is
consecrated% but are not able to offer an alternative% so in fact their attac! is a
longing for recognition" ut the only reason they can attac! is that every artist
has his position in the cultural field% according to his degree of consecration"
4.$. "ositions and position%ta&ings
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
12/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
position in the field8 they act accordingly% e"g" by imitating academic critics and
borrowing their language that is generally considered as 6a high standard"
PositionBta!ing is partly a matter of habitus $ unconscious strategies $ and partly
a matter of conscious strategies $ based on the representation the agent has of
his own position in the field and that of the agent he interacts with $" (his is
again a matter of habitus8
B an author chooses a publisher according to his position in the field
B an editor judges an author according to his position in the field
B a critic judges a wor! by the name of the author and the publisher
(his leads to selfBpreservation% but innovation is still possible- it comes from the
critic who deciphers the wor! of an avantBgarde artist and thus encourages him
to continue" @ee the example of Les =ditions de Minuit $ a #rench publishing
house well !nown for its 6nose for innovation8 they published the 6nouveaux
romans &consisting entirely of metadiscourse' in the EFs and ,Fs and the soB
called minimalists &that reintroduced the intrigue and the characters' in the .Fsand +Fs" #irst the authors were mere individuals% but because the critics and the
public saw them as weird innovators they formed a !ind of school% their
reputation &status4position' gradually bettered and they became the leading
authors"
: this means that the toposof vocation and the choices the artist ma!es are
nothing more and nothing less than a decision based on positions in the field &p"
1+'8 what seems to be inspired by vocation% determined by an intellectual
itinerary or fashion is in fact the result of the artists hierarchic position in the
field and of his cultural capital &p" 1+'" @o again we must conclude there is
nothing sacred or mystic about the artist at wor!-
: the same goes for citations &intertextuality and interpicturality'8 to cite N to
pay tribute to or to be original% but to ta!e position in the field"
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13*;
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
13/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
$. Pierre Michon
efore studying the artistic field represented inthe short story% let us tal! about
the position of Michon in the contemporary literary field8
one of the great names of contemporary #rench literature &though perhaps his
wor!s are not really bestsellers'- he refuses to be a celebrity% a media
personality-
part of a new development8 after the form experiments in the novel $
6nouveau roman which ourdieu calls 6denovellisation in note **% page ;;
$ the story% the intrigue is bac! ¬ only in #rench% but also in 7utch
literature- cf" Daessens%De revanche van de ro(anand the essays published
by 0thenaeum% Pola! O Dan Aennep'" ou should note that from the *+th
century onwards the exclusion of all social or socially mar!ed content from
the wor! was a mar! of 6experimental that is8 highBbrow culture% but no
the story is the experiment' the innovation' the characteristic of novels
belonging to the !R""
Michon8 3uestions concerning art and artists8 why does a writer write or a
painter paintC
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
14/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
#or our analysis% two issues are important8 *' what can we say about Lorentino
en Joseph in the light of ourdieus theoryC and ;' why has Michon chosen
themC
$.1. Roulin and (ourdieu
hat is the interest o% o,servin+ Van $o+h throu+h the eyes o% 2ose"h oulin45
: in fact this short story is a perfect illustration of4discussion with ourdieu
Roulin is naQve% is unprejudiced and tries to understand the talent of Dan
Aogh- he sees and interprets the paintings before Dan Aogh became a myth%
famous because of his suicide and because of what art critics and arthistorians say about his wor!- Roulin !new Dan Aogh before his mar!et
value became proverbial% before his wor! was commerciali9ed"
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
15/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
(he narrator 3uestions the sources of Dan Aoghs reputation8
B Roulin does not read between the lines% but reads the lines themselves- he
does not frolic in metaphor &p" +'
B the novel that had been written too often ever since &p" **'
B a man as massively notable today $ and perhaps for as few reasons &p" *;'
(he narrator systematically undermines everything the 6learned boo!s say
about Dan Aogh and about his portraits of Roulin-
B Roulin would be surprised to see what these boo! tell about him &p" '
B the narrator systematically underlines that we do not !now anything for
sure8 he could% he could% he could &p" ,'
B the holy sanctuaries &p" *1'- hac!neyed words and attitudes &p" *,'
B including the commonplaces &p" ;,'
B 0ccording to Roulin &or is it the narratorC' the 6superlative citi9ens% les
a(ateurs% are told they should be 6enamored of certain wor!s of art &p" /,'"
(he world of art is represented by the young man% the artBdealer who visits
Roulin and tells him about Dan Aoghs rising star : Roulin as!s himself
who had decided that he was a great painter &p" /F'- the young man tries to
explain what nobody understands &p" //' : ironic remar! about 0mericans
who !now what beauty is and by their dollars are able to prove it
(his story shows us how the #RP wor!s and how reputation is determined by
social laws% by the hierarchy in the field"
$.1. #orentino and (ourdieu
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13*
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
16/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
an you e6"lain7 ,y analy&in+ the "o)er relations in the artistic %ield
re"resented in the story7 )hy Lorentino7 in s"ite o% his talent7 has "assed into
o,livion4 8 Lorentino does not "lay the +a(e o% "o)er relations
"oer relations beteen )asari and #orentino
Dasari [slide ]8 rich- went to school with members of the family 7i Medici-
friend of Michelangelo- his wor! &frescos% paintings% churches' were
commissioned by popes and grand du!es- his biography of more than ;FF
artists is worldBfamous- : he is an authority% can decide4has decided upon
reputations- an 6agent of legitimi9ation
does not pay much attention to Lorentino- he is not worth ten or twenty pages
&*;,'- [slide 1]all he does is suggest interpretations of his life $ 6leaves it as
understood &*;,'
but what does the narrator doC (wo remar!s8 hand poorly suited to painting
&*;*'- we do not have to believe Dasari &*;,' he casts a doubt on Dasaris
judgment% thus denying4perverting the power relations"
The *artistic+ field in the short story
(he end of the Suattro cento &*;*'% so at the beginning of the autonomy of
the artistic field% but that was only for the elite in #lorence and we read
Lorentino never dared to go there-
#ield of class relations8 opposition between the city and the country% between
townspeople and peasants8 the latter fear that they will not be understood%
will not have enough words to ma!e their existence !nown &*;1'- cf" *' the
allusion that @aint Martin is there not only for the du!es but also for old
Marias &*;1' and ;' the farmers poor mastery of the language &*;1% *;'
0rtistic field8 reflects these relations8
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13*E
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
17/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
B the peasant with the pig is send away and humiliated by the painters%
because &understatement' he did not seem to come from 0rcady &*;;'% thats
to say he is not one of the rich commissioners-
B the peasant is deeply moved by the magic of images &*;/'- because of his
ignorance% he has his own hierarchy% his values are completely different from
those that are commonly accepted : for the peasant a portrait is what is most
impenetrable and mysterious% because of the price $ you pay half the price of
a farm% only for the colours" @o8 in the hierarchy of the artistic field he is just
a nobody"
The position of #orentino
Dasari says that he is poor% that he ma!es portraits of the rich and mighty and
that he is a pupil4follower of Piero della #rancesca- but we do not !now for
sure if Dasari spea!s the truth% because according to the narrator he follows
the legend &*;*' and he is a romantic% that is to say he has a vivid
imagination &*;;'-5" (he narrator too has a vivid imagination% because we do not !now at all
if he is right- his story about Lorentino is not even a reconstruction% it is mere
supposition : part of his strategy to reveal% and then undermine% the power
relations8 he shows us that a low position in the hierarchy and a lac! of
reputation do not necessarily imply that you are a bad painter"
: so he needs an un!nown painter whose life is still a mystery to all of us"
2hat does the narrator tell us about LorentinoC
B that he is a painter without a sign &*;;' which means that he does not
belong to the established painters-
B how he ma!es the portrait &*;E'8 Lorentino is not an innovator but clings to
accepted representations $ the expected moment% the saint as a Romansoldier- hesitation which model to choose : he is ashamed to receive
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13*,
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
18/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
something from his master and to receive something from a peasant
influence of economic structure4power8 he is middleBclass-
Reconstruction of #orentino,s life *- habitus+
Loren9o d0ngelo Lorentino for his mother% the neighbours and his patrons
&*;,B*;.' : he accepts this as reasonable &free indirect speech' T reflection
of economic field- but also a denigration
does not see the chiaroscuro- he has been taught to imitate the style of Piero
authority &*;.'- he does not have the guts to innovate-
as!s himself if he has become what he wanted to be &*;.'- he has created a
perfect woman $ his daughter 0ngioletta $ but he has not painted her & the
toposof the struggle between art and family- toposof Pygmalion'
: Lorentino is wondering why he has not been successful &*;.'
: finds himself only good enough to paint a peasants saint for a peasant
&*;+'% but that is hisidea% determined by his position in the artistic field
which reflects his economic position- he would have preferred another saint
because they represent a higher &symbolic' value-
: he has a pupil% but he thin!s he has not taught him much8 he has taught
him theory% but not talent% genius- he has not been a master to artolomeo
&*1F' he has failed because he himself was among the greatest &Piero%
Dene9iano'- and artolomeo is li!e a peasant% which means he is not really a
pupil to Lorentino &*1*% *1;- is not even mentioned by Dasari *1;'8 he thin!sabout his artistic career in terms of power relations8 master4pupil% finds
himself unworthy% but we do not !now if that is true"
: Lorentino suffers from his imperfection% see the thoughts he attributes to
his wife 7iosa about him being successful and receiving orders from the
courts% the pope% the princes &*11B*1/' : not for artistic reasons but for
reasons of power% glorification% reward economic reasons &*1/'
Marjolein van Tooren 09.09.13*.
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
19/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
he thin!s he does not deserve this fate% revels in selfBpity &*1/B*1'% which
means he depreciates himself and that is exactly one of the theses of
ourdieu8 once you are in a certain class% you tend to repeat the social
evaluation of that class% it sort of becomes hereditary because you display the
behaviour they expect of you% it becomes your habitus"
!lash%bac& *- habitus+
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
20/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
Lorentino dreams of another patron% @aint #rancis disguised as a pope or a
warlord &*/,'% who would have inspired him to create a masterpiece"
8/12/2019 Text of Lecture Bourdieu and Michon 2013
21/21
Bourdieu and Michon MA-course Literature and Society
Michon completely perverts hierarchy8 *' in the story he shows 6the rules of the
game and shatters them by suggesting that Lorentino was a very gifted man%
perhaps even a greater artist than Piero- in fact he shows the negative effects of
the mar!et of symbolic goods% of the hierarchy in the #RP and ;' he writes in a
very elo3uent% very polished #rench &that evo!es a funeral oration or a
laudation' on someone who has passed un!nown into history : paradoxically%
that ma!es him a distinguished writer ut what he really does is criticise the
commerciali9ation of art and the hierarchy in the world of art" 2ith the
apparition of @aint Martin &after which Lorentino paints his masterpiece' he
seems to return to the romantic topos of the inspired genius" (he story is acritical reaction to the contemporary world of art"