The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 1
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
Environmental Statement, Volume I Non-Technical Summary
November 2012
Notice
This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Wessex Water’s information and use in relation to The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme.
Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection
with this document and/or its contents.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 2
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 3
Contents
Section Page
Introduction 5
Why is the Scheme Needed? 5
The Proposed Scheme 7
Description of Development 12
Environmental Impact Assessment Methodology 16
Planning Context 17
Ecology and Nature Conservation 18
Historic Environment 21
Landscape 22
Water Environment 24
Traffic and Transport 25
Noise and Vibration 26
Air Quality 27
Miscellaneous and Cumulative Impacts 28
Conclusions 29
List of Figures
Figure 1 - The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme 6
Figure 2 - Illustration of the key issues that will be resolved by the Scheme 7
Figure 3 - Options Identification and Assessment Process 8
Figure 4 - Illustration of the ‘long list’ alternatives and the two chosen ‘short-list’ alternatives 9 Figure 5 - Map of the Scheme showing route and Local Planning Authority boundaries 11
Figure 6 - Illustration of an example of a large pumping station, once constructed 12
Figure 7 - Illustration of a typical storage tank, once constructed 13 Figure 8 - Illustration of the construction of a typical water supply pipeline 15
Figure 9 - Construction of a recent water supply pipeline by Wessex Water 16
Figure 10 - The River Wylye SAC from Boyton Bridge 19
Figure 11 - The Landscape around Fontmell and Melbury Downs SAC 20
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 4
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 5
Introduction A planning application has been submitted by Atkins Ltd on behalf of Wessex Water Services Ltd for the
Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme (the Scheme).
The Scheme consists of a large section of new buried water supply pipe, together with associated pumping
stations and water storage tanks located on a series of ten new or extended sites. It forms an essential part
of Wessex Water’s Integrated Water Supply Grid network that will distribute water from areas of surplus to
areas of need.
The planning application has been submitted to three planning authorities: Wiltshire Council, East Dorset
District Council and North Dorset District Council, as the Scheme crosses all three administrative areas. The
approximate route of the pipeline and the new development sites are illustrated in Figure 1 below.
This Non Technical Summary forms Volume 1 of the Environmental Statement, which has been prepared to
accompany the planning application and provides an overview of the need for the scheme and alternatives
considered, the environmental impacts of the Scheme and the measures proposed to mitigate those
impacts.
Why is the Scheme Needed? The Integrated Grid programme is a series of linked projects to allow Wessex Water to resolve a number of
issues with their water supply network. In simple terms, the Integrated Grid involves improving connections
within the existing water supply system to enable water to be moved from areas where it’s available to areas
where it’s needed.
In summary, the Integrated Grid is required to enable Wessex Water to meet the following legal and
regulatory obligations:
The legal obligations in National Environment Programme issued by the Environment Agency,
specifically associated with reductions in the amount of water that Wessex Water can extract from
certain underground water sources from 2018 onwards, as required under the EU Habitats Directive;
The legally binding undertaking agreed with the Drinking Water Inspectorate, to ensure compliance
with Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2000, associated with high levels of nitrates in certain
untreated water sources largely from agricultural fertiliser;
The regulatory outputs set by Ofwat, associated with the security of water supply to their customers
served by a single source of water only; and
The statutory duty to balance the supply of and demand for water up to the year 2035 as set out in the
Water Resources Management Plan approved by Defra in 2010.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme is a key component within the Integrated Grid. It will provide
a new pipeline system that will link together the southern and central areas of the Company’s supply network
and enable the improved transfer of water between these different areas to help meet these obligations. An
illustration of the location of each of the sites where these issues will be resolved by the Scheme is shown in
Figure 2.
The Scheme will provide benefits from:
Reduced abstractions from four existing underground water sources leading to flow improvement in the
Rivers Wylye and Bourne;
Maintenance of drinking water quality for 140,000 water consumers; and
Provision of a more secure water supply for 88,000 water consumers.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 6
Figure 1 – Schematic of The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 7
Figure 2 - Illustration of the key issues that will be resolved by the Scheme
The Proposed Scheme
Alternatives Considered Wessex Water’s supply strategy for the future needs to satisfy a number of key objectives:
Meeting the demand for water over the next 25 years and enabling the reductions in groundwater
abstraction required by the Environment Agency to improve flows in some rivers and protect their
ecology.
Maintaining drinking water quality, when the quality of untreated water at certain underground water
sources is worsening, particularly due to increasing concentrations of nitrates largely from agricultural
fertiliser – as required by the Drinking Water Inspectorate.
Meeting customer expectations for a reliable water supply, established through customer research.
Specifically this involves improving the security of water supply to customers, even in the event of a
catastrophic failure of a water source or treatment works – as agreed with Ofwat.
In order to ensure that it meets Statutory, Regulatory and legal obligations, failing to resolve these objectives
(i.e. doing nothing) is not a viable option for Wessex Water.
Every five years water companies in the UK prepare a strategic Water Resources Management Plan
(WRMP). This plan outlines how Wessex Water intends to ensure a reliable water supply to their customers
over the next 25 years. The need and alternatives for the Integrated Grid, and hence for the Scheme, was
first considered within the WRMP.
Blandford
Shaftesbury
Existing network
Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
Sources with nitrate issues, directly resolved
by Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
Stand alone sources connected into wider supply
Network by Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
Groundwater abstraction licence reduction in 2018
Area of future predicted water supply-demand deficit
LEGEND
B R
E L
Bristol
Bath
Chippenham
Salisbury
Bournemouth
Poole
Dorchester
Taunton
Bridgwater
Yeovil
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 8
Wessex Water considered over 100 options to meet the company’s key objectives and identified the best
solution in terms of ability to supply the water required, environmental impacts (including the carbon footprint
of each), cost and compliance with environmental law. This process is illustrated in Figure 3 below.
Figure 3 - Options Identification and Assessment Process
Using the best options for each area an integrated approach was compared with the traditional alternative of
providing individual solutions for each of the drivers.
The assessment showed that the benefits of the integrated approach were significantly greater than the
costs. Furthermore the environmental and social impacts of the integrated approach were less than the
alternative. Therefore, the Grid concept satisfied all of Wessex Water’s key objectives and had fewer
environmental and social impacts and hence was adopted.
Once the overall concept for the Grid had been established and consulted upon through Wessex Water’s
published WRMP and business plan, a series of more detailed alternative options were then investigated in
more detail to ensure that the chosen layout for the Scheme was the best. A staged approach was applied
in order to logically identify the best solution from a number of competing alternatives.
Stage 1 – ’The long list’: Consideration and assessment of eight regional Grid routes to move water
between the Poole and Salisbury areas. Two preferred routes were short-listed and are illustrated in
Figure 4 along with the eight original options.
Stage 2 – ’The short list’: Consideration of the details of the two short-listed alternatives from Stage 1,
using a range of criteria including environmental impacts, water quality, future and operational flexibility
and ease of construction. This resulted in the selection of a single preferred way to transfer water
between Corfe Mullen and Salisbury via Shaftesbury and Blandford.
The preferred option was found to have fewer environmental impacts, was considered cheaper and
safer to build and avoided the need for new water treatment works as it made better use of existing
groundwater sources.
Plan B
Individual solutions
• traditional approach
• each driver considered
separately
Plan A
Integrated approach
• align strategies
• maximise synergies
Options identification and
assessment
• to meet demand to 2035
• to accommodate low flows
reductions
Feasible options
Options identification and
assessment
• to deal with deteriorating
raw water quality
Options identification and
assessment
• to improve security of
supply to stand alone
sources
Feasible options Feasible options
Water resources Drinking water quality Security of supply
Option identification and assessment process
Water resources Drinking water quality Security of supply
Option identification and assessment process
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 9
Stage 3 – ’The best regional route’: Consideration and selection of different route options for the
pipeline and of different sites for the associated pumping stations and storage tanks in order to provide
the best engineering solution whilst avoiding, where possible, areas of environmental sensitivity.
Stage 4 – ’The best overall route’: Consideration and assessment of options to accommodate known
local ‘pinch-points’ in the preferred regional route identified from Stage 3.
Figure 4 - Illustration of the ‘long list’ alternatives and the two chosen ‘short-list’ alternatives
2
Existing network
Grid concept alternative options
LEGEND
B R
E L
Bristol
Bath
Chippenham
Salisbury
Bournemouth
Poole
Dorchester
Taunton
Bridgwater
Yeovil
16
34
5
7
8
2
Whitesheet storage tank
Existing network
Short-listed alternative concept 1
Short-listed alternative concept 2 – preferred option
Common new pipeline for both concepts
LEGEND
B R
E L
Bristol
Bath
Chippenham
Salisbury
Bournemouth
Poole
Dorchester
Taunton
Bridgwater
Yeovil
Salisbury
Shaftesbury
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 10
This extensive options appraisal process has resulted in the final Scheme that is presented and assessed
within the Environmental Statement. The environmental impacts that cannot be avoided due to engineering,
operational and flow requirements have been assessed through the Environmental Impact Assessment with
the intention to reduce the environmental effects from development as much as possible.
A map of the final Scheme that has been selected is shown in Figure 5 below, illustrating the pipeline route
and the location of each of the pumping stations and storage tanks. The local planning authority boundaries
are also shown to help illustrate the relative amount of the Scheme within each area.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 11
Figure 5 - Map of the Scheme showing route and Local Planning Authority boundaries
SECTION 6
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 12
Description of Development
Sturminster Marshall to Summerslade Down The Scheme will use an existing pipeline to transfer water between Corfe Mullen Water Treatment Works
(WTW) and Sturminster Marshall WTW.
The water supply pipeline between Sturminster Marshall and Summerslade Down is approximately 44km
long, with connections to the existing Wessex Water storage tanks at Snowsdown and Littledown along the
route.
In addition to the new pipeline, a number of new pumping stations and storage tanks are required along the
route to ensure the effective operation of the water supply system. Indicative illustrations of what the storage
tanks and large pumping stations will look like once constructed are provided in Figure 6 and Figure 7. The
storage tanks will be partially buried and grass covered. Landscape planting is provided around the pumping
station, especially around the ancilliary equipment outside the building, to screen it from the site entrance.
Consequently, and to allow vehicle access to all areas, the access road is extended around the whole
pumping station building.
The storage tanks are required along the pipeline route to provide a store of water near to customers, which
can be used to balance variable customer demands throughout the day. The storage tanks along the
Scheme also help to maintain a safe and efficient water pressure in the pipeline.
Figure 6 - Illustration of an example of a large pumping station, once constructed
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 13
Figure 7 - Illustration of a typical storage tank, once constructed
The locations of these sites are primarily determined by the need to locate them adjacent to existing Wessex
Water sites along the route of the proposed pipelines, but also take account of engineering requirements,
topography and environmental sensitivity. The main sites along the southern section of the route are:
Corfe Mullen pumping station. A new pumping station, located within the existing operational site
boundary at Corfe Mullen Water Treatment Works (WTW). The temporary construction area on the
existing site will be between 1.5 and 2 hectares (roughly the size of 2 ½ football pitches) and the new
building will be approximately 17m long, 9m wide and 6.5m high.
Sturminster Marshall storage tank and pumping station. Two new storage tanks connected to a
new pumping station are required on land located directly to the west of the existing water treatment
works at Sturminster Marshall. The temporary construction area will be approximately 5 hectares
(roughly the size of 7 football pitches). The temporary construction area is relatively large at
Sturminster Marshall as it will also be used as a construction and material storage hub for the pipeline.
The new storage tanks will hold 5 million litres of water (equivalent to 2 Olympic swimming pools) and,
overall, the building for the new tanks and pumping station will be approximately 45m long and 65m
wide with a roof that is 9m high.
Snowsdown storage tank. A new storage tank is required at Snowsdown adjacent to the existing
Wessex Water storage tank. The temporary construction area will be just under 2 hectares (roughly the
size of 3 football pitches). The new storage tank will have a capacity of 3 million litres (equivalent to just
over 1 Olympic swimming pool) and will be approximately 55m long, 25m wide and 4 – 5m high.
Pimperne pumping station. A new pumping station is required to the west of Pimperne to allow water
to be pumped from Snowsdown storage tank to Littledown storage tank. The new pumping station will
be located adjacent to existing agricultural buildings, west of the village of Pimperne. The temporary
construction area for the new site will be a little less than 2 hectares (slightly greater than the size of 2 ½
football pitches) and the new building will be approximately 18m long, 18m wide and 7.5m high.
Littledown storage tank. A new storage tank is required at Littledown adjacent to the existing Wessex
Water storage tank. The temporary construction area will be between 1.5 and 2 hectares (roughly the
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 14
size of 2 ½ football pitches). The new storage tank will have a capacity of 2 million litres (equivalent to
about ¾ of an Olympic swimming pool) and will be approximately 20m long, 25m wide and 5m high.
Monkton Deverill pumping station. A new pumping station is required at Monkton Deverill to allow
water to be pumped between Littledown and the new storage tank at Summerslade Down. The new
pumping station will be located adjacent to existing agricultural buildings, south of the village. A new
cross connection to the existing water pipeline between Whitesheet storage tank and Codford WTW is
also required at Monkton Deverill. The temporary construction area will be just over 1 hectare (roughly
the size of 1 ½ football pitches) and the new building will be approximately 36m long, 15m wide and 8m
high.
Summerslade Down storage tank. A new storage tank is also required at Summerslade Down. The
temporary construction area will be approximately 4.5 hectares (roughly the size of 6 football pitches).
The temporary construction area is also relatively large at Summerslade, as at Sturminster Marshall, as
it will also be used as a construction and material storage hub for the pipeline. The new storage tank
will have a capacity of 8 million litres (equivalent to just over 3 Olympic swimming pools) and will be
approximately 43m long, 58m wide and 5m high.
Codford to Camp Hill The Scheme will use an existing pipeline between Summerslade Down and Codford WTW. This section will
comprise 19km of new water pipeline between the existing Codford WTW and the existing Wessex Water
storage tank at Camp Hill. The pipeline route runs along the Wylye valley running to the south of the River
Wylye and the Warminster to Salisbury railway line for the majority of its length. The following works are
also required as part of the Scheme:
Codford WTW. A new pumping station and storage tank is required at the existing Codford WTW. In
addition, improvements are also required to upgrade and extend the existing water treatment works.
The new pumping station, storage tank and water treatment facilities will be located on land directly to
the west of the existing Wessex Water site. Overall the temporary construction area for this site will be
approximately 2.5 hectares (roughly the size of 3 ½ football pitches). The pumping station building will
be approximately 30m long, 15m wide and 8m high. The new storage tank will have a capacity of 2
million litres (equivalent to about ¾ of an Olympic swimming pool) and will be approximately 25m long,
20m wide and 7m high.
Wylye WTW. An additional pump building will be constructed on an extended operational site at Wylye
WTW. The temporary construction area on the existing site at Wylye will be relatively small (40m x
20m) and the new building will be approximately 4m long, 3m wide and 2m high.
Camp Hill storage tank. A new storage tank is required at the existing Wessex Water site at Camp
Hill. The temporary construction area will be approximately 3 hectares (roughly the size of 4 ½ football
pitches). As for Sturminster Marshall and Summerslade, the temporary construction area is relatively
large here as it will also be used as a construction and material storage hub for the pipeline. The new
storage tank will have a capacity of 5.6 million litres (equivalent to just under 2 ½ Olympic swimming
pools) and will be approximately 42m long, 32m wide and 5m high.
Description of Construction Construction of the Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme will commence in summer 2013 for
completion by 2018.
To build the pipeline, the width of the area affected will typically be 20 - 25m along the length of the Scheme,
but this may increase locally to around 30 - 35m where the pipeline crosses roads, watercourses, railways
and the like to facilitate safe working. At hedge crossings this will typically be reduced to 5m in order to
minimise the length of hedge affected.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 15
Typically minor roads, byways, footpaths and other rights of way will be crossed using open cut construction
meaning that the pipeline will be laid in an open, excavated trench as shown on Figure 8. This means that
these rights of way will be subject to temporary closure whilst the pipeline is constructed across them.
Where hedges are crossed using open-cut techniques, a short length (5 – 10m) of hedgerow is typically
removed prior to the pipeline trench being excavated. Once the pipeline has been laid in the trench, it is
backfilled with soil and the hedge is reinstated with new planting to minimise impacts.
Smaller watercourses and ditches will also be crossed using open cut techniques where practicable and in
agreement with the regulatory authorities. Water flow will be maintained down the watercourse during
construction. After laying the pipe, trenches will be filled in with soil and normal water flow will be restored.
The banks and bed of the watercourses will be returned to their original form.
Where more major or very sensitive obstacles are encountered, such as primary roads, railways, major
watercourses or ecologically valuable hedgerows it is possible to install pipes without digging a trench,
typically using directional drilling or auger boring, where a tunnel or passage is cut under the crossing and
the pipe inserted into this.
A typical illustration of a water supply pipeline being constructed is provided in Figure 8 below and an
example from a recent pipeline project undertaken by Wessex Water is shown in Figure 9.
Figure 8 - Illustration of the construction of a typical water supply pipeline
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 16
Figure 9 - Construction of a recent water supply pipeline by Wessex Water
Environmental Impact Assessment
Methodology Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a procedure that ensures that the environmental implications of
decisions are taken into account before the decisions are made.
The planning application site for the Scheme has been drawn widely to incorporate the required construction
works and also the potential for minor route re-alignment (within a typically 50m wide corridor) to avoid
unforeseen environmental features as the Scheme progresses. It is also partially in outline with only the
maximum height, width and length of the new pumping station buildings defined – the details of their design
and appearance will be subject to further, more detailed planning approval. The design of all parts of the
Scheme has been developed to a stage, however, which can reliably inform the EIA process. In addition the
scope of the EIA has been agreed with the planning authorities.
The Scheme has been assessed in terms of the following environmental effects:
Direct, indirect and secondary effects;
Short, medium and long term effects;
Permanent and temporary effects;
Positive and negative effects; and
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 17
Cumulative effects with other projects, plans and policies;
The significance of potential impacts has been considered by taking account of the importance of the
environment that is impacted by the Scheme and the magnitude of any impacts. A summary of the main
findings of this assessment is provided below.
Planning Context Overall, the Scheme is consistent with national, regional and local planning policy and the conclusion of the
assessment is that the scheme provides a neutral, but marginally beneficial impact in respect of key
planning objectives.
The key findings of the assessment are:
Sustainable infrastructure to support the economy and society - Future growth is underpinned by
the provision of sustainable infrastructure such as water supply. The requirement for a resilient water
supply is in the public interest and essential to the local and regional economy. Accordingly, the
development is compliant with and beneficial to both national and regional growth policies.
Climate Change - The Scheme is considered compliant with and beneficial to national and local climate
change policies and objectives. Wessex Water provides 19% of its energy usage from renewable
sources and is taking active steps to increase this provision further.
Development on the Green Belt - The Scheme is considered to be consistent with the policies of
Green Belt protection. The water supply requirements of the Scheme cannot be satisfied by
development on land outside the Green Belt.
Development on the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) - Due to the regional nature of the
Scheme and the areas it connects, there is no scope for avoidance of the AONB. It is considered that
the exceptional circumstances demanded for development in the AONB are met and accordingly the
Scheme is considered to be consistent with policies on development in the AONB.
Protection of historic assets – Whilst the route of the new pipelines passes through various areas of
archaeological sensitivity, it has been located to avoid designated assets of historic importance. The
Scheme is considered to be consistent with the policies of heritage protection.
Protection of nature conservation assets - The measures employed during the design of the Scheme
and through mitigation during construction will ensure that any adverse impacts from the Scheme on
nature conservation assets can be avoided, mitigated or compensated for. Accordingly the Scheme is
considered to be consistent with national and local nature conservation policies.
Agricultural land – The Scheme is considered to be consistent with agricultural land policy, as only a
very small area of higher grade agricultural land is permanently lost, no agricultural businesses or
agricultural practices are compromised by the Scheme, and any temporary loss of crop during
construction will be compensated for.
Protection of residential and other amenities - With measures in place to mitigate the temporary and
permanent impacts, any local adverse impacts on public amenity as a result of the Scheme are
outweighed by the more widespread benefits from the provision of a reliable water supply for
communities. All public rights of way affected by the Scheme will be diverted temporarily. Therefore,
the Scheme is considered consistent with residential and amenity protection policies.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 18
Ecology and Nature Conservation
Existing Environment The Scheme is located in open countryside. In the south, the Sturminster Marshall to Summerslade Down
section of the pipeline follows the relatively low lying River Stour Valley. The route steadily rises on
increasingly open chalk down to the top of Fontmell Hill south of Melbury Abbas, and then drops to flatter
ground to the east of Shaftesbury and drops again to an area of low lying heavy soils to the east of
Motcombe and Mere. To the north of the A303, the route rises again to higher chalk downs.
The Codford to Camp Hill section is largely situated in the River Wylye valley although it rises to higher chalk
downs at its eastern end.
Construction Impacts The largest potential for ecological impacts is during and immediately following the construction of the
pipeline, and relates to potential direct damage to habitats and potential disturbance or harm to species living
within them. The majority of habitat impacted by the Scheme comprises arable and agriculturally improved
pasture fields, both of which are of modest or limited ecological value. The most notable exceptions are
limited impacts on two sites designated for their nature conservation value and habitats including ditches
small rivers and hedges.
International Designations
The proposed pipeline section between Codford to Camp Hill crosses the River Wylye in two locations. This
river is part of the River Avon Special Area of Conservation (SAC) which is internationally designated for its
chalk stream habitats and species. The River Wylye from Boyton Bridge is illustrated in Figure 10. Potential
for impacts will be largely avoided here by use of directional drilling or auger boring (as discussed previously)
to install the pipe beneath the river bed. Residual pollution risks will be managed by careful management of
the construction works as defined by the Construction Environmental Management Plan.
The proposed pipeline route runs close to the Fontmell and Melbury Downs SAC. This area is internationally
designated for its population of a rare chalk flower (the Early Gentian) and also for chalk downland habitats.
The route of the pipeline in this area has been carefully designed to minimise, where possible, impacts upon
the important designated habitats and features. The high quality of the grassland environment in this area is
illustrated in Figure 11.
However, the pipeline in this area does impact grassland habitat adjacent to the designation, including two
areas designated at the county level which is considered to have some ‘buffering’ effect on the internationally
designated habitats. Works in these areas will be undertaken and managed using specialist techniques to
minimise the chances of accidental damage and to allow rapid recovery of that habitat which is directly
impacted by the construction works.
Overall, the Scheme is assessed to have a short term but moderate adverse effect on these two habitats
prior to mitigation works.
National Designations
There will be a direct and unavoidable impact on Ebsbury Down Site of Special Scientific Interest which is
nationally designated for its chalk grassland habitats. The impacted area represents around 0.1% of the
designation and comprises very degraded habitat of neutral ecological value.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 19
County Designations
The entire route will have direct impacts on a five county designated sites. In all instances careful
construction management and restoration are proposed and impacts are considered be minor. As a result of
these impacts Wessex Water will facilitate nature conservation orientated habitat management works on
these sites or similar sites in the wider countryside.
Figure 10 - The River Wylye SAC from Boyton Bridge
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 20
Other Habitats and Species
All of the proposed surface sites fall within areas of less valuable (non-designated) habitat, largely
comprising arable or improved pasture or existing Wessex Water operational land. There will be a
requirement to remove a small amount of hedge at the Sturminster Marshall and Littledown sites and some
trees at the Camp Hill storage tank site. This will be compensated by on site planting.
During construction, the effects on non designated habitats and species include potential impacts on hedges,
ditches and rivers. As for the Wylye, on other major watercourse crossings, the impacts will be avoided
through directional drilling or auger boring below the river bed. However, other features will predominantly
be crossed by using open trenches into which the pipeline will be laid. This will lead to a requirement for the
removal of hedges and hedge vegetation, which will be kept to a minimum, and where possible removal of
trees will be avoided. Hedgerow habitats will restored and replanted where appropriate and in agreement
with landowners.
Particular consideration has been given to impacts on protected species including nesting birds, great
crested newts and dormice as these species have the highest potential to be affected. The overall impacts
on these species are considered to be temporary during construction and their subsequent recovery should
give rise to no permanent impact on populations. To further mitigate impacts Wessex Water proposes to
assist in the continued funding of the existing South Wiltshire Farmland Bird project officer covering the area
and to encourage the undertaking of enhancement works in habitats across the wider countryside.
Overall, the Scheme is assessed to have a short term, minor adverse effect on the national and local
designated areas and on local protected species prior to mitigation works.
Figure 11 – View east from Fontmell and Melbury Downs SAC
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 21
Operational Impacts For the most part, the Scheme will have no operational impacts on ecological features. The one exception
will be the need to discharge treated water into watercourses including the River Wylye, from storage tanks
typically at 5 year intervals and approximately once every 10-20 years for washouts along the pipeline for
routine cleaning and maintenance. Any such water would be subjected to de-chlorination before discharge,
and wherever possible particularly sensitive times of the year would be avoided. Consequently, these
operational impacts are considered to be minor.
Overall Where moderate or minor adverse impacts are identified, these effects will be mitigated through careful
habitat re-instatement and enhancement will be sought wherever possible in both designated and
undesignated areas. Ecological monitoring during construction and species disturbance licenses will further
mitigate impacts. As a result of these habitat reinstatement and enhancement mitigation measures, in
combination with the temporary nature of the majority of the impacts identified and the lack of significant
operational impacts, the scheme is assessed to have a negligible to slight adverse impact on ecology and
nature conservation.
Historic Environment
Existing Environment The Historic Environment encompasses cultural heritage from as early as the Palaeolithic period through to
the modern era. These heritage assets include designated and non-designated archaeological remains,
historic buildings and structures and historic landscapes.
In view of the known archaeological potential of the area traversed by the Scheme, a desk study was
augmented by preliminary field investigations in the form of geophysical surveys (radar based surveys to
highlight interesting buried features) covering all infrastructure sites and targeted sections of the pipeline
route where archaeological potential was considered high. Based on these results further targeted trial
trenching was then undertaken to help determine the nature, extent, date and condition of buried remains to
inform the Environmental Statement and any recommendations to mitigate and reduce impacts.
It has been determined that the pipeline has the potential to affect archaeology remains dating anywhere
between the Prehistoric and Modern periods. However, the geophysical surveys and evaluation undertaken
suggests an overall low density of archaeological features, which in part is due to the sensitive design of the
Scheme in which significant known settlement, built heritage and historic landscape features have been
avoided (during Stage 3 of the consideration of alternative routes for the Scheme outlined earlier).
Construction Impacts The Scheme will have a direct physical impact on a limited number of significant known landscape and
archaeological features and a number of significant previously unknown buried archaeological remains
discovered during the preliminary investigations. Following appropriate mitigation the overall effect on these
assets will be as follows:
Moderate Adverse impacts on:
Sturminster Marshall WTW extension - suspected Prehistoric burnt mounds, Bronze Age settlement
activity;
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 22
Codford WTW extension - Bronze Age settlement evidence and possible 17th century water meadow
systems;
Camp Hill storage tank site - suspected Prehistoric enclosure and field system associated Iron Age
settlement; and
Pipeline section between Sturminster Marshall and Littledown storage tank, adjacent to Bishops Court
Farm - Prehistoric settlement, possibly associated with round barrow.
Slight Adverse impacts on:
Pimperne Infrastructure site - Iron Age settlement activity associated with enclosure;
Various features along the pipeline route including strip lynchet associated with scheduled cross dyke,
Bronze Age/Iron Age linear dyke, Bronze Age/Iron Age linear dyke associated with scheduled cross
dyke, Roman activity and possible metal working site, Roman road; and Bronze Age/Iron Age ditch
associated with scheduled cross dykes.
Preliminary investigations have also identified significant archaeological remains within a further ten localised
sections mainly along the Codford to Camp Hill pipeline route. Field evaluations are currently being
undertaken at these sites, and mitigation recommendations will be confirmed following completion of this
work. The Scheme will also affect the setting of the scheduled medieval strip lynchets at Monkton Deverill,
although careful design of the site and screen planting in keeping with the modern landscape will reduce the
effect to a slight adverse impact only.
Grade II listed Dover House near Codford WTW will have very limited views affected looking out across the
river at Boyton towards the proposed infrastructure site at Codford. Screen planting in keeping with the
landscape character of the area will neutralise the impact.
Operational Impacts The impacts on heritage assets from operational activity will be negligible. Operational traffic movements
(which may affect the amenity experience of historic features) will be minimal and maintenance works are
likely to take place in already disturbed ground such that there is little potential for further disturbance of
archaeological features.
Overall In conclusion, there will be a limited number of significant archaeological sites that will be physically
impacted by the Scheme. The route chosen avoids most of the known heritage features along the route and
the narrow width of the pipeline trench and small number of intermediate sites minimises the scale of any
potential impacts. Additionally, an archaeologist will be present during the construction of the highest risk
areas to minimise the risk of impacts occurring. Where impacts are unavoidable, these will be mitigated
through targeted archaeological excavation and recording, reducing the overall adverse effect of the
Scheme. Twelve sites are still undergoing preliminary investigations; however, considering the Scheme will
have a moderate adverse effect on just four sites at this time and given the great length of the Scheme, the
Scheme overall is assessed to have a slight adverse effect on the historic environment.
Landscape
Existing Landscape Character The proposed Scheme crosses Wiltshire, North Dorset and East Dorset, each of which has an extremely rich
geological, ecological and cultural landscape. This diversity contributes to a distinct landscape character
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 23
resulting in nationally designated areas including the Cranborne Chase and West Wiltshire Downs Area of
Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), the principal protected landscape affected by the Scheme and covering
approximately two thirds of the overall Scheme area.
Corfe Mullen to Summerslade Down Section
The Scheme passes through rural landscapes within East Dorset, North Dorset and Wiltshire. The pipeline
passes close to rural villages, hamlets and scattered farmsteads which have various historical features,
some of which are classified as Conservation Areas.
The scheme environment comprises open countryside with undulating and steep scarps. The fields are
large-scale offering extensive views across the surrounding landscape. Land cover includes arable and
pasture fields with dense hedgerow boundaries to fields. The area has a rich history with many Scheduled
Ancient Monuments located along the route including historic churches within settlements. Figure 11
illustrates the landscape of the area around Fontmell and Melbury Downs SAC, to the south of Shaftesbury.
Codford to Camp Hill Section
The Scheme passes through rural landscapes within west and south Wiltshire. The Salisbury to Winchester
railway line defines much of the built landscape along this section as it runs along the valley floor to the north
of the pipeline. The Scheme passes close to rural villages, hamlets and scattered farmsteads.
The development has a rural setting with open, undulating and steep scarps rising from the river valley.
Where the land rises, fields become more large-scale offering extensive views across the surrounding
landscape. Where the land falls the landscape is more enclosed and increasingly vegetated with woodland
copses and scattered tree belts.
Construction Impacts The new pipeline gives rise to temporary impacts. Whilst there will be ground disturbance and vegetation
loss along the pipeline route within the construction area, the route is located within predominantly open
agricultural landscapes which will quickly return to arable use or pasture. The route has been carefully
selected to avoid woodland areas and lengths of important, mature hedgerow.
The proposed pumping station and storage tank sites are generally well contained from the surrounding rural
landscape due to dense vegetation screening or by nature of the surrounding landscape. The proposed
building style at the pumping stations are generally in keeping with the wider landscape character and
features associated with the local area in terms of scale, land use, visual balance, colour, interest and
texture. In general, existing vegetation and/or new boundary planting screens the interior of the sites. There
are generally few nearby properties or amenities, therefore the sites generate limited impacts upon the wider
landscape character. The planning of the Scheme has sought to achieve two landscape and visual
objectives, first to minimise the visual impacts of the proposals and second to enhance the natural
environment.
The majority of temporary and permanent impacts will occur during the construction phase. In respect of the
pipeline route, the main changes that have the potential to affect the landscape are where the pipeline route
causes loss of boundary hedgerows, mature trees, arable land and areas of pasture/grassland. On the
surface sites, an increase in size and visual prominence of the structures will have a potential effect on the
landscape.
The Scheme proposals include mitigation measures such as replanting and in sensitive areas, techniques
such as translocation of hedgerows and trees. It is likely that the replanted hedge and trees will be notably
younger and less effective as a visual screen until they have fully established and matured which may take
several years.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 24
Operational Impacts Generally the additional surface sites will increase the visual intrusion into the wider landscape. The severity
of the impact will be offset by the distance from nearby properties and people and mitigation measures such
as planting to help screen the sites.
The proposed developments are considered to be of the scale and type which can be accommodated with
limited harm to the local and wider landscape setting. Subject to the implementation of measures to
enhance local biodiversity and visual amenity, the landscape and visual impact of development can be
minimised to an extent which is compliant with the aims of landscape policy, protection of the countryside
and, in particular, conformity with AONB aims and objectives.
Overall With the implementation of sensitive building design and appropriate landscape planting and mitigation,
overall, the proposed development of the Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme is anticipated to have
slight adverse impact on the landscape resources and visual amenity of the local area.
Water Environment
Existing Environment The water environment in the study area is very diverse and includes features, such as the River Avon, River
Wylye, River Lodden and the River Stour, that are of very high quality. These rivers and the habitats around
them are home to important species and their quality and extent need to be protected.
The proposed works will have a number of long lasting positive impacts on the water environment including
indirect benefits for both river flows and groundwater levels. This is particularly true as the Scheme enables
Wessex Water groundwater abstraction to be reduced in the upper River Avon catchment, without the need
for additional new sources of water, to the direct benefit of the flows and ecology of the Avon river
catchment.
Construction Impacts The potential negative water related impacts that have been identified primarily result from the construction
phase; particularly where works are in proximity to a river or over vulnerable groundwater aquifers
(vulnerable because the soil over it easily lets pollutants soak through). The main anticipated adverse
impacts relate to:
The risks associated with construction works over groundwater aquifers that are used for public water
supply;
The risks associated with sediment or pollution runoff from construction compounds;
The risks associated with completing the pipeline river crossings during the construction phase; and
The construction of new structures and buildings where they could be at risk of flooding.
These potential negative impacts upon water quality will be minimised through careful construction practices
as defined in the Construction Environmental Management Plan.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 25
Operational Impacts Operational impacts are limited to water quality impacts to the local watercourses from washouts operated
typically at 5 year intervals for storage tanks and approximately once every 10-20 years for washouts along
the pipeline for routine cleaning and maintenance. Any such water would be subjected to de-chlorination
before discharge, and wherever possible particularly sensitive times of the year would be avoided. The flow
and water quality of the discharges are designed to meet the Water Quality Standards and minimise
potential impacts upon the environment. Consequently, these operational impacts are considered to be
minor.
Overall With the implementation of suitable construction techniques in accordance with the Environment Agency’s
Pollution Prevention Guidelines and techniques such as directional drilling beneath major watercourses, the
potential minor / moderate adverse construction impacts can be significantly reduced. Operationally, the
scheme has a major beneficial impact as it will allow the long term permanent improvements in quality and
flow of the River Avon watercourses through reduced abstraction, which will also help to improve
groundwater levels in the catchment. Overall, the Scheme is assessed to have a major beneficial impact
on the water environment.
Traffic and Transport
Traffic Environment For the construction phase, the potential impacts of the Scheme on traffic and transport result from road
closures and diversions, increases in construction traffic and access arrangements to temporary pipe store
compounds and new pumping station or storage tank sites. For the operational phase sources of impacts
include trip generation and permanent access for operational vehicles to the permanent surface sites.
Construction Impacts For the construction phase transport impacts can be summarised as follows:
The predicted movement of vehicles (construction traffic) to the surface sites is assessed to be of
neutral / minor adverse significance. The impact will be minimised by ensuring that construction
vehicles deliver / remove from the sites outside of peak hours and that construction traffic journeys are
minimised where possible.
There will need to be a temporary closure and traffic diversion at Spread Eagle Hill over a three week
period, and the impact on access to National Trust land in the area is an acknowledged disturbance for
local users. This road closure cannot be avoided due to the sensitivity of the surrounding environment
and factors associated with the safety of the construction works.
All direct impact on major traffic routes is avoided through directional drilling of the pipeline crossing
under the main roads.
Routes for construction vehicles have been provided and mitigation measures have been identified
where necessary.
Some of the highway accesses to pipe store compounds and new surface sites will require mitigation
measures in order to improve the access visibility, such as hedgerow lowering. One of the new surface
water sites, at Camp Hill storage tank will require a new access from the highway to ensure safety.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 26
The significance of the impact on footways and cycle routes is negligible.
The potential adverse impact on bus routes will be avoided through mitigation measures in terms of the
timing of open cut construction and resultant road closures.
These impacts are collectively considered to have a negligible / minor adverse effect on traffic and transport.
Operational Impacts For the operation phase impacts can be summarised as follows:
The trip generation impacts associated with the operational phase of the Scheme are considered to be
negligible as the sites are unmanned.
Access arrangements will be improved at a number of existing sites.
The operational impacts are considered negligible.
Overall With the implementation of suitable mitigation works, including the timing of works to avoid or minimise
adverse effects on road users, temporary diversions to public rights of way and creation of site accesses
during construction, the Scheme is considered to have a negligible to slight adverse effect on traffic and
transport.
Noise and Vibration
Noise Environment The Scheme environment is predominately rural where the principal noise sources are bird song, normal
farming activities, occasional aircraft, and road traffic noise. The road traffic noise typically originates from
local roads with little traffic and in some cases from distant, faster roads. The noise levels at some areas in
the northern section are also influenced by railway noise. In the more populated areas, additional noise
sources include general residential activities.
Construction Impacts The main construction impacts due to noise and vibration are as follows:
At most residential locations, the noise impact associated with installation of the pipeline is insignificant.
The assessment indicated that there would be a slight adverse noise impact at a very small number of
residential properties which are within 100m of the construction works. The impact would be expected
to last for approximately 4 days and will be mitigated through temporary noise reduction barriers during
construction.
Vibration resulting from the use of a directional drill at a major crossing point may be perceptible at
dwellings within 20 - 30m. However it is unlikely to cause damage to buildings within this distance
range. There are only 4 properties at or within 30m of the pipeline works.
During the construction of the pumping stations and storage tanks, a slight adverse noise impact is
predicted for the nearest properties to Wylye, Sturminster Marshall and Snowsdown. The nearest
residential property to Corfe Mullen WTW would be subject to a moderate adverse impact during
construction.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 27
To minimise construction impacts, it will be necessary to employ construction best practice. In addition,
noise bunds/barriers and enclosures may need to be considered. Local residents will be kept informed
of the progress of the works.
The assessment of the temporary traffic diversion in the vicinity of Spread Eagle Hill indicated that a
minor to moderate adverse impact may occur for the three week diversion period.
No significant noise impacts are expected from construction vehicle movements to the surface sites or
temporary construction compounds.
Overall, without mitigation, the potential construction impacts are considered to be slight adverse.
Operational Impacts There are no substantive noise sources at the proposed storage tanks, and significant noise impacts are not
expected.
The daytime noise assessment at the pumping station sites indicated that at all but one location (one
property close to the Corfe Mullen site) the noise from the pumping stations is expected to be below the
existing noise levels.
The night time assessment indicated that the noise impact will be insignificant at the closest residential
properties.
A design requirement will be placed upon all of the pumping stations buildings, in order to limit the external
ambient noise level to avoid any noise impacts at nearby residential properties.
The assessment of additional vehicle movements indicated that there will be a negligible impact on noise
levels when the Scheme is operational.
Overall With the implementation of suitable construction mitigation measures, such as consultation with those
potentially affected, daytime working along the pipeline and noise reduction fencing on the sites, along with
adherence to design requirements to reduce operational noise emissions from buildings, overall the Scheme
will have a negligible effect on the noise environment.
Air Quality
Existing Environment The air quality within one kilometre of the pipeline route is considered to be relatively good. Air quality could
be affected during construction of both the pipelines and the surface sites by excavation and by the
movement of construction vehicles.
Construction Impacts The assessment showed that dust emissions could increase during excavation of the pipeline trench or at
surface sites and through vehicle movements along the pipeline route. However, the potential significance of
such dust emissions would be neutral if best practice mitigation measures are applied and Pollution
Prevention Guidelines adhered to.
Changes in air quality as a result of additional construction vehicles travelling to and from construction sites
would be negligible as would those resulting from any road diversions. Both would be temporary and cease
on the completion of the construction works.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 28
Operational Impacts There would be no significant effect on air quality during the operation of the Scheme.
Overall Overall, with the implementation of best practice construction techniques, there will be a negligible impact
on air quality from the Scheme.
Miscellaneous and Cumulative Impacts A number of other issues are commonly addressed within Environmental Impact Assessments. They include
impacts upon geology and soils (contamination, land stability and Geo-environmental designations) and land
use and have been included briefly in the ES for completeness. However, these factors were effectively
scoped out from further consideration at the scoping stage of the EIA process, by agreement with the three
affected Local Planning Authorities.
The majority of these assessments conclude a negligible impact. The impact on land use is considered to
be a minor adverse effect due to the temporary loss of agricultural land during construction and the
permanent loss of only a relatively small area (<5ha) of high quality agricultural land due to the construction
of the surface sites. The loss has been minimised and no farm businesses will be compromised.
Cumulative Development Impacts Analysis of coincident projects to be undertaken by Wessex Water within or near to the Scheme’s proposed
development area has confirmed that the timing and location of other planned projects will, where possible,
minimise coincidence of works with the installation of the proposed transfer main, thus not exacerbating the
environmental and amenity impacts predicted by the ES. The overall cumulative impact of development is
not considered to be significant.
Overall Overall, the scheme will have negligible impacts on contaminated land, ground stability and geo-
environmental designations and there are no significant cumulative impacts with other plans or projects.
There is a minor adverse effect on land use due to the permanent loss of a small area of agricultural land.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 29
Conclusions In summary, the Scheme is required to enable Wessex Water to meet the following legal and regulatory
obligations:
The legal obligations in National Environment Programme issued by the Environment Agency,
specifically associated with reductions in the amount of water that Wessex Water can extract from
certain underground water sources from 2018 onwards, as required under the EU Habitats Directive;
The legally binding undertaking agreed with the Drinking Water Inspectorate, to ensure compliance
with Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2000, associated with high levels of nitrates in certain
untreated water sources largely from agricultural fertiliser;
The regulatory outputs set by Ofwat, associated with the security of water supply to their customers
served by a single source of water only; and
The statutory duty to balance the supply of and demand for water up to the year 2035 as set out in the
Water Resources Management Plan approved by Defra in 2010.
The benefits of the Scheme include reduced abstractions from four existing underground water sources
leading to flow improvement in the Rivers Wylye and Bourne, the maintenance of drinking water quality for
140,000 water consumers, and the provision of a more secure water supply for 88,000 water consumers.
The Environmental Impact Assessment has reviewed potential impacts and concludes that the majority of
impacts are temporary during construction and of negligible or minor significance. Best practice site
construction techniques will minimise these impacts during construction.
Residual permanent impacts from the Scheme are limited to minor adverse impacts on ecology (from
washout discharges to watercourses), the historic environment and the landscape.
The permanent impacts on ecology can be managed through controlled use of the pipeline and storage tank
washouts. The temporary impacts on ecology can all be managed through suitable construction techniques,
habitat re-instatement and enhancement where possible. To further mitigate impacts Wessex Water
proposes to assist in the continued funding of the existing South Wiltshire Farmland Bird project covering the
area and to encourage the undertaking of enhancement works in habitats across the wider countryside.
The proposed above ground developments are considered to be of the scale and type which can be
accommodated with limited harm to the local and wider landscape setting. Subject to a high quality of
sensitive design and implementation of measures to enhance local biodiversity and visual amenity, the
landscape and visual impact of development can be minimised.
The impacts that have been identified on the historic environment will be managed through targeted
excavation and cataloguing at the four identified sites, along with careful routeing of the pipeline within the
50m planning corridor to accommodate unforeseen areas of archaeological significance.
There are major positive benefits from the Scheme in terms of a long term improvement in the security of
regional water supply and reduced groundwater abstractions for public supply, which will increase river flows
and help improve in-river ecology.
With measures in place to mitigate the temporary and permanent impacts, any adverse impacts identified as
a result of the Scheme are outweighed by the more widespread benefits from the provision of a reliable
water supply for the future and the improvements to river flows in the River Avon catchment.
The Corfe Mullen to Salisbury Transfer Scheme
5096140/Volume 1 - Non Technical Summary - FINAL 30
Document Purchase Hard copies of the entire Environmental Statement and all associated appendices can be purchased from
Atkins.
Copies cost £350 each, inclusive of package and posting.
If you would like a copy, then please contact Atkins at the address shown below, enclosing a cheque made
payable to “Atkins Limited”:
Mark Jordan,
Atkins Limited,
Chilbrook Oasis Business Park, Eynsham, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX29 4AH