The FORESTA ICT Policy CouncilThe FORESTA ICT Policy CouncilDr. Julián Seseña, ROSE VIsion Dr. Julián Seseña, ROSE VIsion
FORESTA Council ChairFORESTA Council Chair
Synchronizing EU-LatAm research priorities and opportunities │Brasilia│ 22-23/09/11Synchronizing EU-LatAm research priorities and opportunities │Brasilia│ 22-23/09/11
EU-LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
OBJECTIVES:1. To define a horizon (long term perspectives) for a better alignment of ICT
reasearch policies and strategies between Europe and Latin America2. To issue short to medium term validated recommendations over policies,
instruments and priorities, in order to achieve the first objective and to improve the efficiency of EU-LatAm cooperation
3. To compile the basic information about current policies, programmes, projects and cooperation practices and to make a first analysis of them
Other data form WP2 & WP4
Long term perspectivesCompilation and Analysis Council about policies, programmes, ICT policy dialogue projects and other cooperation support Council practices short to medium term recommendations
Info about Europe priorities (FP8 & others)
(validated)
What has been done so far
• Previous activities carried out:• policies and programmes (D3.1)• cooperation practices (D3.2)
in seven LatAm countries• Create and to consolidate a working team• Launch the Council
What has been done so far
• Documents used as reference for debates:• Deliverable D3.1, on policies and programmes• Deliverable D3.2, on cooperation practices• Consultation European Commission on the Common
Strategic Framework• Other previous projects´ outcomes and
recommendations• Deliverable D3.3, on Strategic recommendations on key
research issues, opportunities and challenges
Difficulties found and how they have been solved
• Harmonization of the information– Through iterations from each country
• Lack of national metrics on the results of ICT research cooperation practices– Applying subjective expert thinking
Studies pre-Council setting (1)
• All considered countries have given steps to promote the ICT sector, with different extend depending on the country, and always conceived and dealed at national level.
• ICT research policies are relatively new and little developed.• Objectives of ICT policies are always strategic and qualitative. There are no
quantitative goals capable to be measured; nor specific development plans with detailed priorities, clearly assigned budget, etc.
• The ICT research cooperation practices are normally based in European bilateral agreements. FP7 have up to now little impact.
• Inter LatAm ICT research cooperation is rare. Anyhow, there are recently growing movements in this direction.
• The current degree of maturity in ICT research cooperation between Europe and Latin America advises to keep on investing in the short term, in instruments and “raising awareness” on the cooperation oportunities
Studies pre-Council setting (2)
• Most of participants in current or past research projects are either academic, governmental organizations or promoters of research activities.
• The main interest of most LatAm countries are more in the innovation than in the basic research field.
• Innovation projects, with a short time to market, have much more interest for the companies than research projects
• Additionally, the expected results in terms of country development are more directly related to innovation and applied research than to basic research.
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Set up of the Council (adoption of methodology of work, work plan, debates, etc.)
• Invitation to Members:Madrid, 10th March 2011Subject: Personal invitation to the EU-Latin America ICT Policy Dialogue CouncilIt is a pleasure for me to invite you to join the EU-LatinAmerica Policy Dialogue Council on Cooperative Research in the Information and Communications Technologies field. Contributing to the definition of the European political direction in what concerns the EU-LatinAmerica cooperation on research programmes and initiatives, the Policy Dialogue Council is launched thanks to the support of FP7 FORESTA (Fostering the Research Dimension of Science and Technology Agreements) project. The EU-LatinAmerica ICT Policy Dialogue Council mandate is to stimulate and support ICT policies and identify common R&D priorities, opportunities and challenges, focusing particularly on long-term perspectives between Europe and Latin America in support of Information and Communications Technologies research. The Council is set by well reputed experts from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia and México and European experts, who all have a central role in the scientific community of their country.……
Dr. Julián SeseñaInterim Chair of the EU-LatinAmerica ICT Policy Dialogue CouncilPresident, Rose Vision
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Set up of the Council (adoption of methodology of work, work plan, debates, etc.)
• Workplan, objectives:The outputs of the Council are the following:– a position paper describing a common Latin America cooperation
strategy with Europe in the field of ICT research in the middle to long term period, with special attention to cooperation practices inside the new FP8
– a set of recommendations in the short to medium term period, appointing to the key issues to be solved in order to reach the goals established in the position paper
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Set up of the Council (adoption of methodology of work, work plan, debates, etc.)• Methodology:
– A methodology to select Members, to support its work, to select debating issues, etc, was developed. – All Council Members were invited to comment the working practices.– Work is made by correspondence, mainly. Face to face meetings can be organized at the time of the Foresta workshops
and conferences
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Set up of the Council (adoption of methodology of work, work plan, debates, etc.)• Members:
– About 30 Members accepted the invitation, out of 55 invited persons– From México, the following are the members
México
Guillermo Rodriguez Avitia UNAMInnovation director ICT
-UNAM Academy
Armando Herrera Corral
Tecnológico de Monterrey,
Campus Estado de México
Technological Parq ICT
Internal - Research Entity
Héctor Sámano Rocha UEMEXCYTDirector of relations
Mexico-Europe UnionGovernment
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Members:
Country Name Surname Entity Position
Category (Government,
Industry, Research Entity)
Argentina
Uriel Cukierman UP FORESTA Project University
Armando de Giusti Red UNCI Coordinator University Association
Esteban di Tada UP Dean University
Eduardo GabelloniETICs Comission -
CAIPresident Professional Association
Carlos Pallotti Sadosky Foundation ICTs I+D Association Board member
Fernando Racca CESSI President Industry Chamber
Rosita Wachenchauzer FONSOFT - MinCyT Coordinator National Ministry
Carmen La Gamba ITS Argentina Coordinator Research
Olga CavalliUniversidad Buenos
Aires University
Chile
Dánisa Chelen TIC-EDU Directora Government
Sebastian Barrientos Enlaces Coordinator Education Ministry
Claudia Bobadilla UDD Direction University
Andrea Ordenes ProteinLab UTEM Research
Alfredo Barriga Estrateguia Digital Executive Secretary
Paola Arellano REUNA Direction Research
Juan Negroni ProteinLab UTEM Research Research
Alejandro BarrosPublic Sector
Innovation ConsultantDirector en e.nable
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Members:
Colombia
Jorge Alonso Cano Restrepo COLCIENCIASTechnological Development
and Innovation DirectorGovernment
Rolando Martínez ERICSSONHead of Sales and General
ManagerIndustry
Carlos Alberto Peña ALCATEL General Manager Industry
Gonzalo Ulloa Universidad ICESI Dean Enginiering Faculty Academy
José Tiberio HernándezUniversidad de Los
AndesAssociate Professor Academy
Manuel Martínez Niño CINTEL CEO Research
Europe
Julián Seseña ROSE VisionPresident. Interim Chairman
of the CouncilPrivate sector - SME
Didier Luzarraga VEADES Managing Director Industry
Leonardo Piccinetti Europe for Business
Fabio Nascimbieni MENON GEIIE Director EEIG
Oscar Mayora CreateNETHead of Multimedia & Smart
Environments
Other Lat Am Countries
Alex Mora CAMTIC President Industry Chamber
Ricardo EndaraTecnoparque
Internacional de Panamá
Director ONG
Silvia Bidart ALETI Director Industry Chamber
Félix Kemper CONACyT Government CONACyT
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Preliminary Activities: A selection of relevant items has been made by the supporting secretariat (ROSE Vision, Spain) with the support of the FORESTA Consortium.
• As crucial challenge, the Council identified the consultation of the European commission Green Paper on converting challenges into opportunities: the shaping of the Common Strategic Framework (now to be called: Horizon 2020).
• The Green Paper question 26 on International cooperation raised 6 Council Recommendations.
– How can EU support for international cooperation with non-EU countries in research and innovation contribute best to the objectives of Europe 2020 and the EU's external policies? How can EU-based research and innovation become more attractive to partners from around the world? What conditions should be placed on funding non-EU partners? How should cooperation with Member States be reinforced in such international collaborations?
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Preliminary Activities: Council Recommendations to Green Paper:
7. Label Latin American Region as a business priority for Europe, thus, enhancing the research cooperation, as a tool to set fruitful and long term partnerships
8. Develop common strategic research agendas with Regions, as basis for research cooperation.
9. Lunch a specialized International Cooperation Action Line to coordinate all activities regarding international cooperation.
10. Promote the attractiveness of the European CSF through dissemination and information to best researchers around the world.
11. Discriminate the benefits of international cooperation partners on the basis of potential business for Europe. Reciprocity should be applied for competing Regions.
12. Empower an International Cooperation Research Forum to exploit synergies among all European activities at European, National, Regional and Local level. Exploit complementarities among European programmes.
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Preliminary Activities: Council Recommendations to Green Paper. Response submitted.
International Organisations (27) – Artemis 254 KB– CABI 285 KB– Creative Commons Usa 100 KB– Enabling Open Scholarship 730 KB– Eu-Russia Industrialists Roundtable 11 KB– Eureka 303 KB– European - American Business Council 677 KB– European Foundation for Management Development - Efmd 251 KB
– Foresta Policy Dialogue Council Eu-Latin America 127 KB– Heterogeneous Technology Alliance - Hta 132 KB– Ihdp - International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change 319 KB– International Federation of Anthroposophic Medical Associations Ivaa 212 KB– International Knowledge Exchange 111 KB
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Council activities– Once the Council was set with 20+ Members, a first meeting via
audioconference was held on May 10th, 2011. This meeting served to approve formally the contribution to the Consultation on International Cooperation (Common Strategic Framework). Output: FORESTA Policy Council position on the Green Paper CSF v1.0
– Document D3.3, complementing with Policy council recommendations (about 10 versions produced), Strategic recommendations on key research priority issues, opportunities and challenges to be jointly addressed by EU and Latin American countries
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Council activitiesActivities carried out so far
Activity AchievementSet the Council Procedures, documents,
methodology in place
Project Overall Target: 5 to 10 members in total for the whole Latin America
35 experts accepted to participate
Internal project target: 5 to 8 members per country
Contributed to CSF Green Paper
Done
Issue of Recommendations D3.3 delivered
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Council activitiesSome of the relevant Actions carried out so far
Audioconference debate on response to CSF and preliminary recommendations
May 4th, 2011
Audioconference Approval CSF May 16th, 2011
Meeting in Bogotá Universidad Los Andes, June 2nd, 2011
Meeting in México ITESM Campus Santa Fe, July 6th, 2011
Meeting in Brazil Concertation and Conference, Brazilia, 20-23 September, 2011
Website support Jorge Ramirez, ITESM, Mexico
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Council activities
Some of the relevant Inputs receivedJulián Seseña, ROSE, Spain Joao Neves Fernandes, Brazil
Paolo Nascimbeni, MENON, Italia Eduardo Gabelloni, Argentina
Hector Sámano, CONACYT, México Silvia Bidart, ALETI, Latin America
Mauro Bianchi, TESEO Guillermo Rodriguez, UNAM, México
Prof Tiberio (Uni Los Andes) and Yenny Garcia, CINTEL, Colombia
Juan Negroni, UTEM, Chile
Uriel Cukierman and Esteban di Tada, Uni Palermo, Argentina
Didier Luzarraga, VEADES, France
Manuel Martínez, CINTEL, Colombia Hector Torres, Andrea Ordenas, Proteinlab, Chile
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Debates: Other Recommendations7) The Policy Dialogue Council considers that ICT priority is still relevant but would
refocus it on Research for the immersive use of ICT in the Health sector8) The policy Dialogue Council considers that ICT priority is still fully relevant. It also
falls within the European Societal challenges, being a highest priority for future European research
9) The Policy Dialogue Council considers that ICT for learning keeps on being one of the most relevant priorities for the development of Latin America countries
10) The Policy Dialogue Council considers that software engineering is one of the fields where Latin America competences may play a significant role in the global scene, at the same level of India and China, with the priorities indicated above
11) The Policy Dialogue Council considers that the ICT contribution in energy efficiency and renewable energies, may be one the key cooperation fields between Europe and Latin America, as demonstrated by ongoing LAIF current initiatives
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Debates: Other Recommendations12) The Policy Dialogue Council considers that e-inclusion is one of the main domains where Latin America contribution may be more relevant, defining a set of efficient solutions of global impact13) The policy Dialogue Council considers that Security and Prevention has strategic relevance for many Latin America countries, in order to provide Governmental bodies of new efficient instruments to face the main threats and risks in this field14) The policy Dialogue Council considers that Latin America may act as an important European partner in Grid Computing, playing also a role as a market provider15) The policy Dialogue Council considers that the mobile/ubiquitous computing may be considered common ICT research priorities by all Latin America countries16) The policy Dialogue Council considers that the development of eGovernment systems may have a key role in the economic development of Latin America countries, providing efficient ways of improving the services for the citizens and making more efficient the Governmental tasks
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Debates: Other Recommendations 17) The policy Dialogue Council considers that the concept of the national or multinational technology platforms is one of the most valid mechanism to set and develop strategic research agendas, as it group all stakeholders in the research domain.18) Policy Dialogue Council shares the view of NEM to empower the cooperation of Europe and Latin America in the specific niche of networked media19) Policy Dialogue Council recommends the support to the organization of those events and encourage the support from NEM participants to those support actions and projects organizing any sort of the above events where the strategy and goals defined by NEM can be discussed and implemented20) Policy Dialogue Council shares the views of the GlobalNEM Activity in regards of facilitating the debates among support action projects towards debating on their findings in terms of strategic research agendas.21) Policy Dialogue Council agrees that sharing priorities among countries is a way of optimization of the research agendas. In this regard, it is recommended the organization of debates among Latin American countries, with the participation of European researchers, regarding the sharing of priorities among the Latin American research programmes.
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Debates: Other Recommendations22) Policy Dialogue Council recommends the setting of a training and coaching programme devoted to train on the way to develop research agendas, sharing of priorities, and efficient consultation to stakeholders in the ICT research field. 23) Policy Dialogue Council recommends the promotion of Strategic ICT agendas, including Innovation (Research, development and innovation), in order to favour the research towards efficient exploitation of the results of the research. The Technology Platforms format is one valid vehicle to build constituency of the ICT sector, where the industrial views can be visibly and deeply represented. Using the research towards exploitation of its results.24) Policy Dialogue Council recommends the orientation of the research priorities with observing the to support growth and environment, weight of SMEs, less favoured communities and applicability of Green ICT ental protection
• 25) Policy Dialogue Council recommends the setting up of special cooperation group between European researchers (namely represented by the Activity group on Gaming industries within the NEM technology Platform) and University groups like University of Los Andes from Colombia to further develop common research agendas on this research niche.
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Debates: Other Recommendations26) Policy Dialogue Council recommends the setting up of cooperation mechanisms like the Eureka-Eurostars European programmes, which can benefit the cooperation among several research groups in different Latin American countries. Rules, operational procedures based on the European experience should be offered to the Latin American research funding agencies to explore the opportunities to launch common calls, to fund international research projects, etc. The Iberoeka programme can be the starting point to strength this type of cooperation.27) Policy Dialogue Council recommends the setting of permanent dialogue among key standardization bodies in Europe and Latin America with the perspective of exploiting the results of research activities, as well as setting their requirements in the early phases of the standardization process, aiming at jointly contributing to the overall global market expectations. 28) Policy Dialogue Council recommends that Latin American countries continue being considered as preferential partners for the participation in the European framework programme, as there is a benefit for the European entities.29) Policy Dialogue Council recommends that Frame Work programme funds allocated to Latin American researchers can found additional funding from National funding agencies in order to promote their interest and benefits to cooperate with the European Consortia.30) Policy Dialogue Council recommends also establishing a permanent dialogue with the people on charge of the current different funding cooperation instruments between Europe and Latin America including the EuropeAid ones and the new LAIF (Latin America Investment Facility)
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Further work:– Develop and shape some of the previously identified
recommendations– Map recommendations to country specific interests. Respond to the
survey on priorities– Identify additional recommendations, if so desired. Provisionally
identified:• Framework for Latin American multilateral research cooperation, CINTEL and ROSE with
CELTIC Office• Develop Rec 25 on Gaming industry; Uni Los Andes and CINTEL• Opportunities on eHealth, Mexican council, ITESM• Opportunities for cooperation in the standardization domains, ????
– Extend the Brazilian membership of the Council?
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
• Further work: Shaping priorities. Members of the Council, with the support of FORESTA partners are invited to fill in the priorities questionnaire.
Criterion: 5 (highest priority), 1 (lowest priority)
Recommendation Argentina Brazil Chile Colombia México
1
2
3
4
…
30
Inputs: by 15th October 2011. At least, one response per Council Member plus oneResponse per Foresta partner
EU – LatAm Policy Dialogue Council
Thanks very much
Dr. Julián SeseñaPresident, ROSE Vision
Chairman, EU – Latin American Policy Dialogue Council