The Toulmin Model:A better way of evaluating arguments
By Harut SargsianSpeech 104 Spring 2012
Stephen S. Toulmin
• Dr.Toulmin a well respected Philosophy Professor at USC
• Developed a model that demonstrates to us on how to evaluate arguments.
• The Toulmin model breaks the argument down to six parts.
Why use the Toulmin Model?
• We use the Toulmin model to better understand an argument.
• The better we understand the better we can know what the strengths and weaknesses are.
• The better we know the strenghts and weaknesses the easier we can resolve the issue at hand.
The Steps of the Toulmin Model
• Claim• Grounds• Warrant• Backing• Reservation• Qualifier
The Claim
• The Statement that is being argued
• Example: You should purchase a BMW
Grounds
• The roots of your claim, what you are trying to prove.
• Example: BMW has been the best selling premium car brand in the world for over 10 years.
Warrant
• The data that links the claim and the ground together, to form a stronger basis.
• Example: BMW has been voted as best consumer satisfaction out of any other car brand.
Backing
• The support of the argument, covers all points of argument to make it clear to the audience.
• Example: You can find a BMW dealership and service center in almost all major cities in the U.S.
Qualifier
• A statement that shows the strength between the data and the warrant, and how well the claim applies to both of these.
• Example: Many people are satisfied with BMW.
Rebuttal
• Counter –arguments that go against the original argument, finding the perfect statement to give an initial rebuttal to the argument.
• Example: Many BMW enthusiasts are prepared to offer you great service at any BMW center.
Sources
• The Toulmin Model of Argument: http://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/documents/Toulmin.pdf
• BMW News Group USA: https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/pressclub/p/pcgl/startpage.htm
THE END