Traditional vs. Alternative Assessment
What is the definition of assessment?
Assessment is the process of finding out how well students have mastered the curriculum.
Traditional AssessmentTests, quizzes, essaysBecame very popular in schools in the
80s when grades were based almost entirely on results of completing multiple choice items on classroom tests that were similar to standardized tests.
Research shows in some cases that there is very little relationship between such test grades, and any measure of students' ability to apply knowledge.
Traditional AssessmentThese types of tests (multiple
choice, similar to standardized tests) are very low on Bloom's taxonomy (recall).
They emphasize memory over more complex skills with a focus on grades and ranking.
Traditional (continued)Based on psychometric theories
of the 1950sIndividuals have/develop specific
and general abilities that can be measured by written tests and will predict / correlate in practice.
Traditional (continued)The formats of these items tend
to be very similar (ie> multiple choice)
The conditions under which the tests are given are also standardized (ie: amount of time, no talking).
Traditional (cont)Produce results that are
comparable between groups, (class to class) but it also tends to make testing highly artificial when compared to what scientists or anyone for that matter actually does in real life.
Alternative assessmentperformance based so sometimes
called “performance” assessment.Uses activities that reveal what
students can do, emphasizing their strengths instead of their weaknesses.
Alternative assessment instruments are by necessity designed and structured differently and are graded and scored differently
Alternative assessment:Students take more responsibility
for their learningTeacher and students assess
student problem-solving skills, not just the product
Human judgment is used for scoring
Higher level thinking
Alternative AssessmentWorks well in learner-centred
classrooms since they are based on the idea that students can evaluate their own learning and learn from the evaluation process.
A detailed scoring rubric is essential: evaluation criteria and standards are known to the student.
Involves interaction between the assessor (instructor/peers/self) and the person being assessed.
Alternative cont...Built around topics or issues of
interest to the studentsReplicate real world
communication contexts and situations
Involve multi-stage tasks and real problems that require creative use of language rather than simple repetition.
Require learners to produce a quality product or performance.
AlternativeAllow for self-regulation, self-
evaluation and self-correction.Methods include checklists,
portfolios, journals.....What, if any are the
disadvantages?
Alternative disadvantagesDifficult to assign a score to a single
student performance (relative to marking a multiple choice test for example)
Portfolios can be time consuming to evaluate for a teacher with a full course load
Comprehensive set of scoring guidelines (rubrics) must be developed in order to accurately judge completeness and quality (also time consuming).
Disadvantages to alternative assessmentsLack of use in traditional
educational institutions (universities)
Most instructors/teachers have no training to develop these types of assessments
difficult to develop and grade
In summary....Difficult to dismiss traditional
assessment entirelyIdeally a combination of both. That
way a teacher can address many learning styles, yet still prepares students for a university or exam experience.
Start slowly to implement alternative assessment strategies – it can’t be done overnight.