US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
US Army Corps of EngineersUS Army Corps of EngineersLife Jacket Policy TestLife Jacket Policy Test
Lynda NuttLynda Nutt
National Association of State Boating Law Administrators Annual Conference
September 2010
BUILDING STRONG®
BUILDING STRONG®
BOTTOM LINE:
Since 1998, nearly 2,000 visitors have died on Corps-managed waters while engaged in water-based recreation:
Greater than 90% of the victims were NOT wearing a life jacket.
BUILDING STRONG®
“…explore the feasibility of establishing a life jacket wear policy on all US Army Corps of Engineers waters.”
MG Don T. Riley
Command Decision to Test
BUILDING STRONG®
BUILDING STRONG®
Vicksburg District Four Lakes in Mississippi
Arkabutla, Arkabutla, Sardis, Grenada Sardis, Grenada and Enid Lakesand Enid Lakes
BUILDING STRONG®
Pittsburgh District Limited policy actually
implemented in 1991; adopted by State in1995 (Corps lakes)
Decline in enforcement activity over years
Brought into the study in 2008
► Baseline data showed very low rates
► Minimal enforcement activity
2009 wear rates fell below national voluntary rate
BUILDING STRONG®
Sacramento District
BUILDING STRONG®
Policy based on statistical trends Policy based on statistical trends
Greatest risk groups:► Boaters in smallcraft ► Boaters underway► Swimmers outside of designated swim beaches
BUILDING STRONG®
The Wear Rates JSI Study – Voluntary wear JSI Study – Wear rates under policy Validation study important for
confidence in findings Early findings show great success
when policy exists AND is worked ►Through educational contacts►Through posted restriction►Through obvious LE presence
BUILDING STRONG®
Vicksburg DistrictVicksburg District
2008 Baseline versus 2009-10 Cumulative Wear Rates2008 Baseline versus 2009-10 Cumulative Wear Rates
BUILDING STRONG®
The Test
WHAT IT IS ABOUT:
- Increasing wear rates to effectively reduce fatalities
- Implementation challenges
- Finding the pro’s and con’s
- Information gathering for USACE and others
WHAT IT IS NOT ABOUT:
- Killing boating or any other water-based recreation
- Taking away personal choices
- Replacing education
BUILDING STRONG®
What we’ve learnedWhat we’ve learned Advance coordination and continued Advance coordination and continued
communication is criticalcommunication is critical
Education still plays a roleEducation still plays a role
Boaters will comply when faced with a Boaters will comply when faced with a policy; swimmers outside designated policy; swimmers outside designated areas were tougher to regulateareas were tougher to regulate
Lives have been saved Lives have been saved
BUILDING STRONG®
Documented statements from survivors Documented statements from survivors that despite educational messages, that despite educational messages, they would not have worn a life jacket they would not have worn a life jacket without policywithout policy
BUILDING STRONG®
USACE Test Will DocumentUSACE Test Will Document Wear rates pre-and-post policy testWear rates pre-and-post policy test
Recreation effectsRecreation effects
Budget and staffing implicationsBudget and staffing implications
Public, Stakeholders and Public, Stakeholders and Congressional reactions/actionsCongressional reactions/actions
Agency costs of not having policyAgency costs of not having policy
BUILDING STRONG®
Our expectationsOur expectations
Our test will be a catalyst for changeOur test will be a catalyst for change Recognition by Corps, US Coast Guard Recognition by Corps, US Coast Guard
and partners of need for national policyand partners of need for national policy Acceptance of life jacket policy by Acceptance of life jacket policy by
boating public boating public To be able to make solid To be able to make solid
recommendations to HQs leadershiprecommendations to HQs leadership► Is it right for the Corps?Is it right for the Corps?