(Why) Are African Americans and Latinos underrepresented among UI beneficiaries? An exploratory look
Andrew Grant-ThomasDeputy Director, Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity
Annual Conference NASI- “Meeting Today's Challenges in Social Security, Health Reform, and Unemployment InsuranceJanuary 27-28, 2011 National Press Club, Washington DC
1
Blacks and Latinos have endured especially high unemployment during the latest recession
2
Blacks and Latinos also are overrepresented among the long-term unemployed (Dec 2010)
3
0
5
10
15
20
25
BLACKS LATINOS ASIAN AMERICANS
% of Labor Force
% of Unemployed
% of Long-term Unemployed (52 weeks+)
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey
The relationship between race/ethnicity and long-term unemployment holds over time
4
However, Blacks seem to be somewhat underrepresented and Latinos very underrepresented among UI recipients
5Source: BLS Local Area Employment Statistics and DOL Employment and Training Administration, Characteristics of the Insured
Unemployed for Calendar Year 2009; BLS Preliminary 2009 Data on Employment Status by State and Demographic Group
41.0%42.8%
39.1%
32.4%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Overall White Black Latino
There are 15 states for which we have fairly good race/ethnicity data on UI recipients in 2009. The unemployed in these states include 2.9 million whites, 1.1 million African Americans, and 360,000 Latinos.
Recipiency rates by race/ethnicity across 15 states, 2009
There is significant variation in relative recipiency rates by race/ethnicity at the state level
6
Recipiency rates by race/ethnicity in most populous of the 15 states, 2009
Source: DOL Employment and Training Administration, Characteristics of the Insured Unemployed for Calendar Year 2009; BLS Preliminary 2009 Data on Employment Status by State and Demographic Group
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Ohio Maryland Georgia Illinois North Carolina Pennsylvania Tennessee
White recipiency rate
Black recipiency rate
Latino recipiency rate
Underrepresentation of Blacks/Latinos in UI worrisome because their families are very vulnerable financially
Insight CCED, "Social Security at 75: Building Economic Security, Closing the Racial Wealth Gap“ webinar. June 17, 2010. 7
Even “high income” African American families can ill afford missed paychecks
8Source: Institute on Assets and Social Policy, “The Racial Wealth Gap Increases Fourfold.” May 2010.
Possible explanations: It may be that…
1. Blacks and Latinos more likely to live/work in low-coverage states (geographic distribution/bad-luck )
2. Blacks and Latinos less likely to meet state eligibility criteria (worker status issue/bad luck)
3. Disparities by race/ethnicity are not coincidental; the Unemployment Insurance program is “racialized” in design and by the role of bureaucratic discretion in its implementation
4. Unemployed Blacks/Latinos less likely to apply for UI
5. Undocumented immigrants more likely to count among the unemployed than to receive UI benefits
9
1. Relative to Whites, Blacks and Latino populations are unfavorably distributed in re state UI recipiency rates
10
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
White population Black population Latino population Entire population
High
Medium
Low
27%33%
32%
35%
37%
36%
27%
20%
53%
32%
31%
38%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, "Estimates of the Resident Population by Race and Hispanic Origin for the United States and States: July 1, 2008 (SC-EST2008-04),“ and ProPublica, “Is Your State's Unemployment System in Danger? November 2009/ http://www.propublica.org/special/is-your-states-unemployment-system-in-danger-603
Distribution of US population by race/ethnicity and state recipiency rates –low (20%-41%), medium (41%-50%), and high (51%-69%) – in November 2009
2. Blacks and Latinos overrepresented among unemployed workers most likely to be ineligible
11
Among unemployed, African Americans less likely than whites to be “job losers” in 4th quarter, 2010 58% and Blacks and 64% of whites were “job losers”
(vs. new entrants, reentrants, etc) Blacks and Latinos disproportionately low-income. The EPI
estimated that in 2009: Blacks were 11% of the workforce, but 18% of workers
affected minimum wage increase to $7.25/hr. Hispanics were 14% of the workforce and 19% of
workers affected by increase.
3. Is UI racialized in design and through the role of discretion in its implementation?
If so, one would expect, for example:
A positive association between recipiency rates and proportion African American and/or Latino
A positive association between wrongful denial of UI benefits and proportion Black and/or Latino
Relatively favorable results to African Americans and Latinos in states that rely more on automation
Greater denial of African Americans and Latinos than of similarly situated White claimants
12
Black-White Implicit Association Test Results
27%
27%
16%
17%
6%
4%
2%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
Strong preference for Whites
Moderate preference for Whites
Slight preference for Whites
Little to no preference
Slight preference for Blacks
Moderate preference for Blacks
Strong preference for Blacks
N = 732,881 13
A few proven behavioral implications of implicit bias
In “shooter game,” mistakes follow clear pattern: people shoot more unarmed blacks and fail to shoot armed whites
Doctors’ implicit racial attitudes unequal treatment for Latinos and Blacks compared to Whites
Resumes with “white-sounding” names (Emily, Greg, Jill, Todd) receive 50% more call-backs than those with “black-sounding” (Jamaal, Latoya, Tyrone, Lakesha) names.
Neighborhoods with White-only residents evaluated much more favorably than same neighborhoods with black residents or racially mixed residents
More or less implicit bias corresponds to comfort level and body language in interracial interactions
“Emergency Treatment May Only Be Skin Deep.” Science Daily 11 Aug. 200714
Back to UI -- states with higher proportions of Black Americans do also have lower coverage rates
15
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.000 0.100 0.200 0.300 0.400 0.500 0.600
IUR/
TUR
Reci
pien
cy
Pct. of State Population African American
Black state population shares x recipiency rates (2010) (Correlation = -0.40)
Source: http://www.doleta.gov/unemploy/chartbook/chartrpt.cfm
Same is true for Latinos, but the relation-ship is weaker than for African Americans
16
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250
IUR/
TUR
Reci
pien
cy
Pct. of State Population Latino
Latino state population shares x recipiency rate (2010) (Correlation = -0.16)
Source: http://www.doleta.gov/unemploy/chartbook/chartrpt.cfm
For Whites, the reverse is true: the greater the White proportion, the higher the coverage rate
17
0.000
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000 1.200
IUR/
TUR
Reci
pien
cy
Pct. of State Population White
White population shares & recipiency rates (2010)(Correlation = 0.22)
Source: http://www.doleta.gov/unemploy/chartbook/chartrpt.cfm
The distribution of the black population nationally has not changed dramatically between 1930 and 2000
18
2000
1930
State shares of B’s/L’s were positively associated with improper monetary denial rates, not with separation/non-separation errors
19Source: DOL Employment and Training Administration, Benefit Accuracy Measurement, Denied Claims Accuracy Report 2009. http://www.ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/bam/2009/Denied_Claims_Accuracy_Rates_CY_2009.xls
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
Impr
oper
mon
etar
y den
ial r
ates
Percent of state population that is Black and Latino
(Correlation = .27)
Potential ResponsesTo possibility of racial/ethnic bias: Make race/ethnicity data collection mandatory
for all UI applicants Conduct audit tests for bias in claims
processing Reduce bureaucratic discretion through still-
greater use of automation Offer de-biasing training
20
Potential Responses (cont.)
Expanding access and speeding transfer: Support wider state adoption of modernization
reforms Require employers to distribute UI information
to displaced workers Change the benefit calculation formula to aid
low-income workers Allow workers to bank their benefits over time
21
22
KirwanInstituteon:
www.race-talk.org