Download - World Bank Document · 2016. 7. 15. · dcf incd as: ; . The Lormz curve ia the relationehipbetveen - P(x) and Fl(x). The * grap%gf the curve -. ie repreeented in a unit square. The

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Development Research Center

Discussion Papers

No: 12

APPLICATIONS OF LOREN2 CURVES IN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

N.C. Kakwani

August 1975

SOTE: Discussion Pnpcrs are prelin~inary materials circulated to stimulnte diecuosion and crirical -comment. References in publication to Discussion Papers 5ould be cleared with the author(s) to protect the tentative character of these

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

The Lorenz c u r v e r e l a t e s t h e c u m u l a t i v e p r o p o r t i o n of i c c m e u n i t 6

t o t h e c u n u l a t i v e p r o p o r t i o n of income r e c e i v e d when u n i t s a r e a r r anged i n

a s c e n d i n g o r d e r of t h e i r income. I n t h e p a s t t h e c u r v e h a s been mainly u s e d

a s a c o n v e n i e n t g r a p h i c a l d e v i c e t o r e p r e s e n t t h e s i z e d i s t r i b u t i o n of

i n c o n e and w e a l t h .

The i n t e r e s t i n t h e Lorenz c u r v e t e c h n i q u e h a s been r e c e n t l y

r e v i v e d by Atlcinson [ 1 ] who p rov ided a theorem r e l a t i n g t h e s o c i r l

w e l f a r e f u n c t i o n and t h e Lorenz cu rve . He showed t h a t t h e r ank ing of

income d i s t r i b u t i o n s a c c o r d i n g t o t h a Lorenz c u r v e c r i t e r i o n is i d e n t i c a l

w i t h t h e r a n k i n g imp l i ed by a g g r e g a t e economic w e l f a r e r e g a r d l e s s of t h e

form o f t h e w e l f a r e f u n c t i o n of t h e i n d i v i d u a l s (except t h a t i t be

i n c r e a s i n g and concave) p rov ided t h e Lorenz c u r v e s do n o t i n t e r s e c t . Hou-

e v e r , i f t h e Lorenz c u r v e do i n t e r s e c t , o n e can a lways f i n d two f u n c t i o n s

t h a t w i l l r ank them d i f f e r e n t l y . Das Gupta , Sen and S t a r r e t t [ 2 ] have

shown t h a t t h i s r e s u l t is i n f a c t more g e n e r a l and does n o t depend on t h e

a s sumpt ion t h a t t h e w e l f a r e f u n c t i o n s s h o u l d n e c e s s a r i l y b e a d d i t i i e .

I n t h e ' p r e s e n t pape r t h e Lorenz Curve t echn ique is used a s a

t s o l t o i n t r o d u c e d i s t r i b u t i o n a l c o n s i d e r a t i o n s i n economic a n a l y s i s . T h e

G n c e p t o f Lorenz cu rve h a s been ex tended and g e n e r a l i z e d t o s tudy t h e '9 L

r_e l a t i onsh ips among t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n s of d i f f e r e n t economic v a r i a b l e s . D.e *

I! S n e r a l i z e d L l ~ r e n z c u r v e s a r e c a l l e d c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e s and t h e Lorenz .

c u r v e i s o n l y n s p e c i a l c a s e o f such c u r v e s , v i z , , t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e

1 / f o r income.-

I / P r o f e s s o r Mahalonobis [ 6 ] used c o n c e n t r a t i a r i c u r v e s t o d e s c r i b e t h e - consumption p a t t e r n f o r d i f f e r e n t commodities based on t h e Na t iona l sample Survey Data . See a l s o Roy, Chakravnr ty and Laha [ 7 1

Sect ion 2 gives t h e de r iva t i on of the Lorenz curve. Some theorezs

r e l a t i v e t he concent ra t ion curve of a func t ion and i ts e l a s t i c i t y a r e

provided i n Sec t ion 3. These theorems provide t h e b a s i s t o s tudy r e l a t i on-

sh ips amon; t h e d i e t r i b u t i o n e of d i f f e r e n t economic va r i ab l e s . Appl icat ions

of the t heo rem a r e discussed i n Sect ion 4.

2 . THE WRENZ CURVE

Suppose t h a t income X of a family is a raildam v a r i a b l e with

p robab i l i t y dens i t y func t i on f ( X ) . Then t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n func t ion F(x)

is defined a s :

and t h i s f unc t i on can be i n t e rp re t ed a e t h e proport ion of fami l ies having

income l e s a than or equal t o x.

I f i t is us& that t h e mean E(X) - N of t h e d i e t r i b u t i o n

e x i s t s and X > 0 , then t h e f i r s t moment d i s t r i b u t i o n func t ion of X is - dc f incd as: ;

The Lormz curve i a t he r e l a t i o n e h i p b e t v e e n P(x) and F l ( x ) . The - . * grap%gf t he curve i e repreeented i n a u n i t square. The equatioxr of t h e -.

l i n e P1 F l a c a l l e d t h e e g a l i t a r i a n l i n e and i f the Lorenz curie c o i n c i d e s

with thim l i n e i t impl ies that each family receive8 the same income.

Tlie most widely used measure of i n e q u a l i t y i s G i n i ' s Index which

is e q u a l t o twice t h e a r e a between t h e Lorenz curve and the e g a l i t a r i a n

l i n e . I t can be w r i t t e n a s : -

a0

and i t v a r i e s from zero t o one.

3 . THE CGNCENTRATIGN CURVES

Let g(X) b e a cont inuous f u n c t i o n of X such t h a t i ts f i r s t

d e r i v a t i v e e x i s t 8 and g(X) 2 0 f o r X > 0 . I f E [g(X)1 e x i s t s , then - one can d e f i n e :

so t h a t F [ g ( x ) ] i s monotonic i n c r e a s i n g and F1 [g (o ) 1 0 and PI [g(m) 1 11. 1

The re l . a t ioneh ip between F1 [ g ( x ) ] and F(x) w i l l be c a l l e d t h e concenkra-

. ? t f o n curve of t h ~ e f u n c t i o n g ( x ) . & - - - . I t can be se )n t h a t t h e Lorenz curve of income x i s a s p e c i a l *

I - case of the c o n c e n t r a t i o n curve f o r t h e f u n c t i o n g ( x ) when g(x) - x.

The above g e n e r a l i z a t i o n of t h e Lorenz curve was suggested by

Profesrsor P.C. 4lnhalanobis t o d e s c r i b e t h e consuroer behav iou r p a t t e r n v i t h

r e s p e c t t o d i f f e r e n t commodities.

The r e l a t i o n s h i p between 5 [ g ( x ) ] and P (x) w i l l be c a l l e d the 1

r e l a t i v e c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e of g(x) wi th r e s p e c t t o x. S i m i l a r l y . l e t

* g (x) be ano the r cont inuous f u n c t i o n of x , then t h e graph of F1 [ g ( x ) ]

* F1 [ g ( x ) ] will1 be c a l l e d t h e r e l a t i v e c o n c e n t r a t i o n curve oL g(x) v i t h

* r e s p e c t t o g (x) . Let 0 (x) be t h e e l a s t i c i t y of g (x ) v i t h r e s p e c t co

8

x , then:

where g l ( x ) ,is t h e f i r s t d e r i v a t i v e of g ( x ) . *

S i m i l a r l y denote (x) a s t h e e l a s t i c i t y of g (x) with r e s p e c t 8*

We can now s t a t e t h e fo l lowing theorem:

Tli60REV I : The c o n c e n t r a t i o n curve f o r t h e f u n c t i o n g (x ) w i l l l . ie above - *

(below) t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n curve f o r t h e f u n c t i o n g (x) i f

0 ( x ) i s l e e s ( g r e a t 5 r ) than 0 (x) f o r a l l x > 0 : B 8* -

Proof of the Tkeorw 1

Using t h e equa t ion (3.1) we o b t a i n :

- 5 -

vhich g i v e t h e s l o p e of t h e r e l a t i v e c o n c e n t r a t i o n curxVe o f g ( x ) w i t h

* r e s p e c t LO g ( x ) a s :

The equa t ion (3.6) i m p l i e s t h a t t h e r e l a t i v e c o n c e n t r a t i o n cu rve is monotonic

i n c r e a s i n g . S i n c e t h e c u r v e must p a s s through ( 0 , O ) and ( 1 , l ) i t f o l l w s

t h a t a s u f f i c i e n t c o n d i t i o n f o r El [ g ( x ) ] t o b e g r e a t e r ( l e s s ) than

* F1 [ g ( x ) ] is t h a t t h e c u r v e be convex (concave) from above. To e s t a b l i s h

c u r v a t u r e we o b t a i n t h e second d e r i v a t i v e of Fl [g (x ) ] w i th r e s p e c t t o

t h e s i g n of t h e second d e r i v a t i v e is g iven by t h e s i g n o f n ( x ) - n (x) . g g*

Thus t h e second d e r i v a t i v e is p o s i t i v e ( n e g a t i v e ) i f n i s g r e a t e r ( l e s s ) R

then f o r a l l x . Hence t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n cu rve f o r g ( x ) is above & * *

(below) t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e f o r g (x) i f rl (x) i s l e s s ( g r e a t e r ) g . P

than (x) f o r a l l x 7 0 . i3

' S * Let g (x ) = c o n s t a n t f o r a l l x > 0, then t h e e l a s t i c i t y n (x)=O -

L * git - an* F1[g ( x ) = F(x) which is t h e equa t ion of t h e e g n l i t a r i n n l i n e . Thus*

m . we have t h e fo l lowing c o r o l l a r j .

.';.~G~L.t.?? I : z h e c o n c c n t r a t i a n c u r v e i c r :hc ~ J ~ I C L : ~ ? g ( x ) v i l l 'l:e z b c . ~ ~ .

(below) t h e e g a l i t a r i a n l i n e if (x) is l e s s ( g r e a t e r ) thz.-. g

zero . --

-. The proof of C o r o l l a r y 1 !s a l s o d i v e 0 by ?.;.;, , r l zXravar t i a c d

* i a h a [ 7 1. Next we assume t h a t g (x) = x s o ti-.at - x ) = 1 and t h e

,4 * * c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e f o r g (x ) i s ~.c-+~ the Lzrens Tcr t h e d l s t r i b u t i o ~

x . I c f o l l o w s f rom t h e C o r o l l a r y i t!:clt tk.- L c r e n z c a r v e f o r x l ies belcr.

t h e e g a l i i a r i a n l i n e and t h e r e f o r e t h z cT:~;c I s ccncnve fro2 abme. F u r t h k r ,

from Theorem 1 we have t h e f o l l o w i n g C o r o l l a r j .

CO?CLLARY 2: The c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e f o r t h e f ~ : i c " -7 - . g ( x ) l i e s above -----

(below) t h e L o r e n ~ c u r v e f o r t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n s f x i f -

I ~ ~ ( x ) i s l e s s ( p r e a t e r ; thnn t in icy fo r a= x > - 0 .

I f t h e f u n c t i o n g(x) h a s t h e u n i t e l a s t i c i t y f o r a l l x - > 0 , t':e

second d e r i v a t i v e f o r t h e r e l a t i o n c o n c e n t r a t i c n o f g(x) w i t h r e s p e c t t o

x w i l l be z e r o which i m p l i e s t h a t s l o p e of t h e r c l a t i . : ~ concent ra t l ion curve

w i l l h e c o n s t a n t For a l l v a l u e s of x . S i n c e t h e cu rve s : ~ s t pns s through

(0 ,Oj and ( 1 , l ) i t means t h a t t h e r e l n t i v e z o n c e n t r i ? : ! ~ ~ cl t g(x) wi th

r e e p e c t t o x , c o i n c i d e s w i t h t h e l i n e ( 2 , G ) and (I,! i . l i ~ n c e

F1 [g(x)] - F ( x ) f o r a l l x ; k-hjch pr- jvco ti?c f o l l o b - f n g : 1

.a CCROLLARY 3: The c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v c f o r g ( x ) cci r .c idcs w i t h t h e Lore- . -- c u r v e f o r i f r? ( x ) - i o r A ; I ;. ; of X .

g ---- e- - I t shou ld be p o i n t e d o u t t h a t i!le ~ c n r r n i r a t ? r i . For g ( x ) ? s :;.:

1 7 the same t h i n g a s t h c Lorenz cur-Jc i i t r 7 ':,, . v ( -. : i.c.- l i o , ; t ~ :kc

c o n d i t i o n under which bo th a r e i d c n : i c ~ ~ .

let y =: g(x) be a random variable with prokability density

* * f~ r . c : i on f ( y ) and the distribution function F ( y ) , and if rean of

v exists, the first moment distribution funstior. cf y I s g iven by :

-

0 * * then [ F (y) , F (y ) ] is a point on the Lcrenz curve f c r g(x ) . The

1

following theorem gives the conditions uader which:

* * F (y) = F(x) and F1(y) a Fl [ 6 ( x ) 1 (3 .9 )

fcr all values of x.

TI!E(?PE?':' 2: - If g(x) &strictly ~onotonic and has a continuous derivative

g' 0:) > 0 for all x, - then the concentration curve for g ( x )

coincides with the Lorenz curve for the distribution of g ( x ) . -

t>oo f of the Theorem 2

Under the oeeumption that g ( x ) is strictly conotonic and has a

cor,tinuoue non-vanishing derivative in t1:c region : , :he probo~bility

density function of y is given by II

* f (Y) E: f [ h ( y ) j 1 h f ( y ) ( (3 . ; 3 )

- - where x - h ( y ) is the solution of y - g ( x ) . ' J

L - * , 8 . Let US now consider the gl-apt1 of F (x) -JC F f g ( > r j ] which h a s ti:< C i -

s l o p e

v h i c h ion u s i n g (3 .10) becomes one if h l ( y j > 0 . h ' ( y j is obv ious ly

g r e a t e r t han z e r o f o r a l l y . F u r t h e r s i n c e g l ( x j > 0 and t h e cu rve m u s t

* pass through (0.d) and ( 1 , l ) i t i m p l i e s t h a t t h e c u r v e F [ g(x) ] .vs

F(x) v h i c h h a s c c n s t a n t s l o p e one must c o i n c i d e wich t h e l i n e p a s s i n g -

* through (0,O) and ( 1 , l ) . Hence F [ g(x ) ] = F ( x ) .

* S i m i l a r l y i t can b e proved t h a t t h e g r aph of F, [ g ( x ) ] v s F1 [ g ( x ) ]

1

has s l o p e one i f h t ( y ) > 0 . S i n c e t h e c u r v e p a s a e s t h r o u g h (0.0) and

( i , i ) , i t must c o i n c i d e w i t h t h e s t r a i g h t l i n e j o i n i n g (C,O) and ( 1 , l )

* which i m p l i e s F1 [g (x ) 1 = F1 [ g ( x ) ] . T h i s p r o v e s t h e t h e o r e a .

I I T 1: The f u n c t i o n g(x ) i s s a i d t o be Lorens s u p e r i o r ( i n f e r i o r )

* t o a n o t h e r f u n c t i o n g (x) i f t h e Lorenz c u r v e f o r g(x )

* l i e s above (below) t h e Lorenz c u r v e f o r g (x) f o r a l l

I t f o l l o w s from t h e d e f i n i t i o n of Gin i- Index t h a t t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n

gene ra t ed from f u n c t i o n g ( x ) w i l l have lower ( h i g h e r ) v a l u e of Gini- Index

* thnn t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n g e n e r a t e d from g (x ) i f g(x) l a Lorenz e u p e r i o r

* ( i n f e r i o r ) t o g (x ) .

* C I f t h e f u n c t i o n s g ( x ) nnd g ( x ) a r e s t r i c t l y monotcnic and

have c o n t i n u o u s d e r i v a t i v e s s t r i c t l y g r e a t e r thnn z ~ r o , t hen from Theorem - - 2 i t f o l l owe t h a t t h e i r c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e s co . inc ide w i t h t h e i r r e s p e c t i v e J

Q

Lorenz c u r v e s . Then u s i n g Thebrem 1 we o b t a i n t h e fol!\wing C o r o l l a r y . - - E I * Js

1

fcFc.-!*lf?Y 5: -- I f t h e f u n c t i o n s g(x) a$ g (x) ore e t r i r t l y ~ o n o t o n i c -- and hnve c o n t i n u o u s d e r i ~ n t i . ~ , e s ~ t r i c t l v g r e a t e r t h a n z e r o ,

R

it re^^ go : ) is r i r ( i f . ' 2 (x,)

i f q (x) is l e s s ( g r c n t e r ) t han 9 ( X I f c r a?: - S ----- *

* ; \ ~ a i : ~ if we p u t g ( x ) = x S O t h a t q X ) 1 r k e 1 Ccrcll.:r:;

g * -

5 l e a d s t o t h e i -o l lowlng C o r o l l a r y .

:;,L.,;LL/:?)' 6: I f g ( x ) i s s t r i c t l y n o s o t o n i c and i:zs a c 3 n t ! ~ u o u s c e r i v a - - - -

t i v e g ' ( x ) > 0 f o r a l l :i: t h e n g(x) Is ;,c:enz s u s e r l u r

( i n f e r i o r ) t o x - i f i ip(x) i s l e s s (2ri-;iir t:ioo r, ( x ) g

f o r a l l x > O . -- -

C 2: The c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d e x f o r gix) l e f l n e d a3 9 n e z i n 3 . i ~

t w i c e t h e a r e a u n d e r t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n c E r v e f c r_ g ( x ) .

I n ollr n o t a t i o n , t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d e x f o r g(x) i s g i v e n b y :

1)

C g = * - 2 ' F1 [ g ( r ) ] f ( x ) dn. I

1 t 1!1 co h c not.ed t11nt j f g ( x ) = corlr;t.nnt., t h e c o ~ ~ r ~ ~ n : r , ~ : i c ~ n c r i r v D coi-.c5,.t2.

w i t h t h e c p , a l t l : a r l a n l i n e s o t h a t C - 0. I f ( x ) : -I i s d n y

c o n s t a n t , t h e n t h e c o n c e p t r a t i o n i s e q u a l t o t h e Gini-Inr!t .x of x . F\:r '&her,

i f g ( x ) 0 f o r a l l x , t h e n C is n l v z y s p o s i t l : . ~ ' 8 i n d v l l l bc: c q : i n l r; R

t h c GlnL- Index o f t h e E u n c t l o r ~ g ( x ) . F i n a l l y i f b ( x ) C) fo r a l l X ,

t h ~ n t h c c - o n c e r r t r a t i o n c u r v e f o r g ( x ) i s a b o v e t h e er,,+l! t ~ r ; a n i:r.c <=r.d - C wlll Se e q u a l t o m i n u s t i m e s F

k :c -,.--..-, -.zL:L.-L,4 3: ~f g ( x ) = 1 g i ( x ) s o t h a t E !a(:.:)] - t 5 ( ' X I ]

1: 1 i i= 1

where E i s t h e expec t ed v a l u e ope=r, : t en :

I Y C ~ f of the Tnecrem 3

k 3 1 S u b s t i t u t i n g g ( x ) = gi(x) ia (3.1) g'.vtJ:--

%=I

N o w Pi [ g i ( x ) ] i s g iven by:

t h i c h on s u b e t i t u ! t i n g i n (2.13) g i v e s t h e r e s u l t s t a t e d i n T h e o r a 3.

. E x ; the;. Le t g(x) = n+bx E O t h a t E [ g ( x ) ] = a+bu , ~ i . - - - -

g(x) cnn b e t r e a t e d R B t h e Bum of two f u n c t i o n s , v i z , a and b x . Hence f r o 2

TIleorem 3 ve o b t a i n :

Because ttt! c o n c c n t r n t i o n c u r v e f o r a c o n s t a n t funce on c o i n c t d e s w i th t h e - I egalitarl& l i n e . The e q ~ a t i o n (3 .16) con a l s o be writttn ;ri:

31 The i n t e r c h a n g e of eumriatiorr s i g n 2nd -- k is f i n i t e .

S i n c e F ( x ) .- > F1(x) f o r all . x i t i ~ ~ p l i e s t h a t t h e c o l : c e r . t r c ~ i . n cur-;? i c r

R 1 i n c a r f u n c t i o n (a i- bx) l i e s above ( ' te low) t h e Lorc:;z cu rve f o r u i f

n is g r e a t e r ( l e s s ) t h a n z e r n . F x r t h e r i f b>O , t h e function g < x ) = a -

bx is a monotonic i n c r e a s i n g f u n c t i o n of x , frox Theor& 2 5~ f u l l - ~ s thz:

t h e ~ o n c e n t r ~ a t i o n c u r v e f o r (a + bx) c o i r c i d e s w i t h the Sorenz CLL:-ve of

f u n c t i o n (a + b x ) . Thus w e have t h e f o l l o c i n g c o r o l l a r ; J .

, - TChOI.Ur7Y 7: Tf b > 0, t h e n t h e l i n e a r f u n c t i o n ( a 4 b u j -15 Lorer.z --

s u p e r i o r ( i n f e r i o r ) t o x if a is g r e a t e r ( l e s s j t h a ~ .

ze ro .

k k 1 - . 3 1 .

I titi,,<Cd 4 : -- - I f g ( x ) - 1 gi(x) SO that.+ E[g,x)] = 1 K f s . (x)] , i=l 1 in1

t h e n : - k

E t a ( x ) l cg - 1 ~ [ g ~ ( x ) l c g i ( 3 . 2 1 ; in1

i h e r e Cg and Cgi a r e c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d i c e s f a r g ( r ) g i ( x ) ,

r e s p e c t i v e l y .

1'1-oc~ f of th Theorem 4 : --

S u b s t i t u t i n g (3.13) i n (3.12) g i v e s : . r

m k

, , i ( x F i g i j f X x ( - . - 2 ,

1 - 0 '2 L

w!>ich on i n t e r c h a n g i n g t h e s-tion and i n t e g r a l ~ i g ; : f i 5rrc L z ~ 9 :

a w L U

k 2 .. I

3 . - - 5 " 1 - - 1 E[p.i(~p:) j 1 - i f (u):;:< E I g ( x ) ! i

- . L

>

f iow C 8 1 is d e f i n e d o f i :

-12-

L u

F [g , (x)] f (x ) c ix C g l - l - 2 \ 1 ( 3 . 2 ~ ; 0

- k S t t S s t i t u t i n g ( 3 . 2 4 ) i n (3.23) and u s i n g t h e f a c t that E[g(xjj = 1 E [ z (x,:

i=1 i

g i v e s t h e r e s u l t (2 .3Gj . T h i s proves t he theorex .

L e t u s a g a i n assur;le t h a t g(x) = a+bx so that E[g(x ) ] - a+Ep .

I f b > 0 , g ( x ) 13 a monotonic i c c r e ~ s i c g fcnct:cn, t h e r e f c r e the c o n c a -

t t a t i o n index f o r g ( x ) w i l l be saze as t h e G in i- index of the f lalnct im.

N w us ing t h e f a c t t h e Gini- Index of a constant is z c - o , and t h e

Gini- Index of bx is same a s t h e Gici-index of x , i t foilcws from T h e o r c

* where G i s t h e Gi r i - Index of x arld G i s t h e Gin i- Index of t h e l i n e a r

f u n c t i o n x ( a + bx) . We have the f o l l c d i n g c o r o l l a r y .

L'CR(?LIARY 8: I f G i s t h e Gini- Index of n random v a r i a b l e x, then ihe ---- - *

Gini- Index G of a l i n e a r f u n c t i c n ( a 5x) f o r b > 0 -- -- . c

is g iven by:

- where E ( x ) - P , * s

* * 'e In t h e above Corollary i f a - 0 , G = G w h f c h !.npifei? r:-,st i f all incc-,__.

a r r n r l l t i p l i r d by a anme c o n s t a n t , then t h e

* Further, G is iess ( g r e a t e r ) t h a n G I f

I n t h i s s e c t i o n w e s h a l l c o

n

s i d e r s o ~ ? :lf i h e a::;lic,;tic!zs of :he

4 / t ? i ~ c r c z q g i v e n i n t h e i n s t s e c t ion .-

- . . . I f g(x) i s t h e e q u a t i o n of Er;gal Ci;rvt'. 91 z .-r~..;nc; t-'. -, , then < r

fo!lor;s f r o n C o r o l l a r y 1 a n d 2 thz: i f i t s concen t r s r i r in zclrve l i es a b o v e

t h e e g a l i t a r i a n l i n e , i t i s a n i n f e r i o r co i - l -okJ l t> , iL : o c r t n t r a t i u n

c u r v e l i e s be tween t h e t o r e n z c u r v e of x an3 r;!c k s n l 3 t i i r : n n i i n e , 1: i s

a n e c e s s a r y commodity a n d i f t h e c o n c - . n t r a t i o n curlre lit:; r e i o 1 t h e L o r e n z

c u r v e , t h e commodity i s l u x u r y .

4 . 2 Ccnsmption and .Saving Filnctio~ro

I n t h e K e y n e s i a n c a s e t h e c o n s u m p t i o n is r e l z c e d t o i n c o x e e i t h e r

l i n e a r l y o r c u r v i l i n c ~ r l y . L e t u s f i r s t a s s n n e t h a t t h e r t l s : ! o n be i i n e a ; :

* .

v h e r e 3 i s t h e r l a rg 'na l p r o p e n s l i y t o cansuz:* f:::ci - i ;- :!-:c. : !spor. -~F. le

jnconr a n d c is the conGumption e x p e n d i t u r e of a n inr'.i:.i:;;:n-. S i n c e n

and r a r e : r e n t e r t h a n z e r o , i t f o l l o u s f r o n C o r o l 2 . z r - y 7 ~!i:>t t h e ; E T : - c : . ~ - - - 'i L

c c r i s u r ~ p t i o n e y e n d i t u r e 1s moLe e q u a l l y d i s t r ! ' 8.:t.i : t -.- " . r c - r t o r , ~ ? - d i s p o s a b l e income.

-

!+/ .'.!any n o r e a p p l i c a t i o n s o f t h o ti;carLl:a:; w!; l i-.;: .-:li ;-;:,-: . I ' ' - ,. . , 3 lc~::::-;~:<:L.:.. :.onoqraph w h i c h i s ;:nc!e:- p rep~r ; \ : t : ; i ? .

~+..f..Lch a g a i n f r o n C o r o l l a r y 7 i m p l i e s t h ? t t h e persGr.e7 sr ;vir ,zs -d i l l b e c o r e

uEequal ly d i s t r i b u t e d t h a n t h e p e r s o n a l d i s p o s a b l e income provzded t h e

a a r g i n a l p r o p e n s i t y is l e s s t h a n oxe.

Let U E now i n t r o d u c e t h e r a t e of i n t e r e s t a s a n ac!di:ional v a r i a b i ~

i n t h e savings f u n c t i o n ( 4 . 2 . 2 ) :

& e r e r i s t h e r a t e of i n t e r e s t . I f 8 < 1, t h e n f ron C c r o l l a r y 8 w e

o b t a i n :

v h e r e G and G a re G i n i - I n d i c e s of d i s p o e a b l e income and r,avings, r e s p e c - 8

t i v e l y . i n t h e mean d i s p o s a b l e incoine and us i s t h e cean s a v i n g x.iiick.

? a g iven by:

. i

h

Dl f r e t e n t i o t i n g ( 4 . 2 . 4 ) w i t h r e s p e c t t o r g i v e s :

C

vh c h l e o d r t o t h e c o n c l c s i o n t h a t h i g h e r t h c i n t c : . - i : , ? T c , xsre cr, ';ai r > -

5 e t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of s a v i n g s . This concltlo!on i:. of cp .a r r r . 5:iseZ CI; :':,,

~ s s : m p t i o n t h a t th2 i n c r e a s e i n t h e l n t c r c , s t ro:c ::L,c. - - ' .4 L I ter "-- C r e

d i a t r i b u t i o n o f t h e d i s p o s a b l e i ncane .

I i I

-.16-

1 i I . .

? . I J-ZZXIILZ i?! un T n i I . ~ t i m " a r y i ' c s z ~ , ~ ~ I

1 Consider a n econcny i n which p r i c e s and prodcc~i- : i :y a r 2 r i s i n g 2:

dnnclal r a t e of 100 p and 100 s p e r c e n t . Sus-,ose t h e ~ ~ I Z P T C S of a l l i n c c a e

, . :nits a r e i ~ c r e a s i n g i n t h e same p r o p o r t i o n . Then ir.coc.c i?f a u n i t a f t e r t

where x is t h e i n i t i a l income. Le t t h e t a x f u n c t i o n 1 ;s :

t hen t h e t a x c o l l e c t e d a t t ime t from a n incorre u n i t ult!: i n i t i a i income ;;

w i l l b e :

l a t h c mean t n x pa id at t ime z e r o , then t h e ccnn t a x p o i 2 n : r:me t v i i l be -

b h i c h g i v e s t h e ave rage tax r a t e z t t i c . e

L;,CX c ;:(Y) = ,. y - [ r . ( t ) ] = , ~ ( t ) . T'llus, i f t i le t a x e s tire ; r o g r c s s i v e

: > 1 , t!le s -~ : ragc t a x r a t e w t l l ir!crcl:!se (c iecret ise) c7,.cr ti.-* i f ? , s a r p

g r e a t e r ( l e s s ) t h a n z e r o b u t l e s s t h a n one i n a b s o l u t e v a i u e .

The d i s p o s a b l e income a t t i n e t of a u n i t havir2g i a i t l z i . i a c o ~ i z

x is x ( t ) - T { x ( t ) ] a n d , t h e r e f o r e , a p p l y i n g Theoi-er 3 xc. o:, tain:

where

q ( x ) = $ 1 a x6 f (x) d x

i s t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f t a x p a i d by i n c o n e u n i t s h a v i n g i n c c z z l e s s t h a n o r e q u a i

* L C J x a t t i m e z e r o and Ft (x ) is t h e p r o p o r t i o n o f t h e

* t h e d i s p o s ; l b l c income o f t h e same i n c o n e u n i t s a t Lime e . , ( r ) i s t l ~ e

ne3n d i s p o s a b l e income a t t i m e t :

* t , ? t p ( t ) = { ( l f p ) ( l + s j } p - {( l . l l1 ) ( l L : j j (: (4 .L.G) - -

Tl:e ecluat i n n ( 4 . 4 . 7 ) simplifies t o :

I f t h e t a x f u n c t i o n i s p r o g r e s s i v e , i . e . 5 > L, t h e n f r o n

C o r o l l a r y 2 , F, (x ) > q (x) f o r a l l x u h i c h f rom (1.6.10) i z p l i s s that .. the c o n c e n t r a t i o n c u r v e f o r t h e d i s p o s a b l e incor-e ar: ti-ze : I s h i g h e r

-

t h a n ? h e L c r e n z c u r v e f o r i n c o ~ e . F u r t h e r , i f ::?e zarg::,.?l t c x r a t e :Ls

l e s s t h a n o n e , t h e d i s p o e a b l e i n c o a e i s a n o n o t o n i c i n c r e s s i c g f u n c t i o n

o f x v h i c h f r o n T h e o r e n 2 i n p l i e s tha t t h e 8ccr.cectrat?o?. C ' I N ? f o r :he

d i s p o s a b l e income a t t i m e t c o i n c i d e s w i t h i ts L o r e n z z : r v e . T h u s f c r

n p r o g r e s s i v e t a x s y s t e m t h e a f t e r t a x i n c o ~ e at t i r e r ? s m r c e q u a l l y

d i s t r i b u t e d t h a n t h e b e f o r e t a x i n c o r e .

Di f f e r e ~ n t i a t i n g ( 4 . 4 . 1 0 ) w i t h r e s p e c t t o p gi3;es :

A g a i n , i f t h e t a x s y s t e m i s p r o g r e s s i v e 6 > 1 and i (x) > q ( x ) 1

which i m p l i e s t h e r i g h t - h a n d s i d e o f ( 4 . 4 . 1 1 ) i s p ~ s i t ! - . ~ e ~ n c i , t h e r e f o r e , ,is

p i n c r e a s e s t h e L o r e n z c u r v e f o r a f t e r - t a x income d i s t r i l u ~ i o n v i l i s h i f t

c p v a r d . S i m i l a r l y , i f t h e t a x s y s t e m i n r e g r e s s i v e , 6 1 f i n ] q k x )

t h e r i g h t- h a n d s i d e o f ( 4 . 4 . 1 1 ) is a g a i n p o u i t i v e . The !.%crr,i?z c u r v e ~ i h i f t s L

upvnrJ no p i n c r e a s e s . Thus we c a n c o n c l u d e t h a t t h e i n f l n e l o n decrease^

t h e a f t e r t a x i n c o m e- i n e q u a l i t y f o r b o t h p r o g r e s s i t c and :r;;r:.r:3ivc t a x

systerno p r o v i d e d t h e b e f o r e t a x d i s t r i b u t i o n i s n o t affected by i n f i a r i o n . - The a b o v e c o n c l u s i o n i o v a l i d ably i f t h e ' i sx ; .~ a c e c a t 3 d j u s ; e a

t o i n f l a t i o n . Su,ppose w e c h a n g e t h e t a x r a t e s every yeAr kj- b c s p i a g t

".- c c n e t n n t b u t c h a n g e t h e p a r a m e t e r t . i n e t a x f ~ m c ~ ' l a - . t i t -2r-c i <:an

t h e n b e * n i t t e n ae:

v h e r e a - 3 a t t = 0 . Then t h e mean t a x a t t i n e t will be: t

a t

~ ( t ) = [ (1 + p ) (1 + 9) j 6 t Q ( 4 . h . l j )

and , t h e r e f o r e , t h e a v e r a g e t a x r a t e b e c m e s :

Suppose we a d j u s t a eve ry y e a r s u c h a way t h a t t!.e r a t i o of t

t o x t o income rer0,aine c o n s t a n t . Then from (4 .4 .14) i t can be seen t h a t

v h i c h means a is t o be r educed eve ry y e a r i f t h e tax f ~ x . c t i o n i s t

p r o g r e e s i v e and f o r a r e g r e a b i v e t a x f u n c t i o n a s h o u l d he increosec i . t

Nuw ue ing (4.4.15) I n (4.4.10) g i v e s :

- - * which implieu t h a t d P t ( x ) / dx I 0 . Thus we conclude: thn t t f t h e : n x

3 - f u n c t i o n i s a d j u ~ t e d eve ry y e a r such n \ jay t h a t t h e tax-lncrtr,.e r a t 2 0 i s *

* I concirsnt rvery y e a r , t h e n t h e i n f l a t i o n w i l l n o t ctiiinge t k r nf:er ?ax incs:,

d i ! l t r i b .d t i on f o r any tax sys t em p r o g r e n s i v e o r rcgressivc.

L e t :

* Ct

a Cin i- index of t h e a f t e r - t a x d i s t r i b u t i c n 3t

t i n e t .

C = Gini - index of b e f o r e- t a x incone a t t=0 .

- C o n c e n t r a t i o n index of t a x e s p a i d a t t i n e

ze ro .

f rom Theorem 4 we o b t a i n :

vh i ch g i v e s t h e e l a s t i c i t y of t h e Gin i - Index of t h e a f t e r t a x d i s t r i b u t i o n

wi th r e s p e c t t o i n f l a t i o n r a t e a s :

We can now compute t h e Gin i- index and t h e e l o c t i c i t y of t h e Gin i -

index v i t h r e s p e c t t o i n f l a t i o n r a t e . The s o u r c e of d a t a use6 f o r t h i s

purpose i s t h e A u s t r a l i a n Taxat lolf S t a t i e t i c s f o r t h e a s sc s s r r sn t yea r 1971-;2

(Income t n x y e n r 1970-71). lT.e d a t a n r e s v o i l n b l e i n gronped form. The

incoae c o n e i d e r e 2 i a t h e a c t u a l income f o r i n d i v i d u a l t n x pnyc r s less t h e ' ? -

e x p e n d i t u r e i n c u r r z d i n g a i n i n g t h a t income. - ~ i n e - - i n & of b e f o r e t a x i n c ~ m e vat3 conprlteC t o b e . 3 4 5 6 and f o r

t h e t a x p a i d t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n index w a s . 5 4 1 9 . The t a x funcl . ion was

5 / e a t i ~ m t e d t o be : -

5 / The weigh ted r e g r e s e i o n method was uaed t o e s t l r i t c t h e ta:: f u n c t i o n . -

l o g T = -6.2064 + 1.583 l o g x ( L . 4 . i > ;

-.h,!re .,: rt,srcsc-:~ts i n c o ~ r a n 2 T t~3:ics. 'The squsre.? c u r r e l n t i o r , bc.:.;c_en

~ ~ t : ; r . j t ~ d a n d a c t u a l v a l u e s of T ~ 3 s conputed t o be .99.

~ t b l c I j r e s e n t s t h e C i n i - i n d e x of t h e a f t e r - t a x incose a n d i ~ s

e l a s t i c i t y v i t h r e s p e c t t o t h e raLe cE i n f l a t i o n . I t i s t o 5 2 noted t h e

Gin[- index is q u l t e s e n s i t i v e t o t h e i n f l a t i o n a sd t h e s e n s i r i v i t y i n c r e a s s s

wi th t h e r a t e of i n f l a t i o n an2 a l e o over t i z e .

Table 1: GIXI-LWEX OF THE kT@i TAX LNCOME AND ITS ELASTICITY WITH RESPECT TO IWPLirTiOH RATE

* u 9 1973 - 1974

Glni- Index l l a s t i c i t y

.0201

.3138 .0109

1972 - 1973 Gini- Index E l a s t i c i ~ y

Rate a t I n f l a t i o n

.31?5

.31G3

I

.0067

0.0000 1

. , I24 - .0071

- -10

1970 - 1971 1971 - 1972

0 . 0 0 1 .3110 -, 0021 .3096 1 -. 0047 .JOB1

C i n i - I n d u E l a s t i c i t y Gini- lnden E l a s t i c i t y

I .3124 0 .00

.3124 1 0 .00

I I 1 ,3121; .3105 - .3080 . 'Q65 -. 01 2 3

I 0 .3124 O.oO j . ) I17

I

I I

I

.0143

.0074

.3141

. 3 i 2 9

I

.3086 I

r a

. 3 1 2 4 1 0 .00 .309k -. 0074 . 3 0 h l -.0165 .7021+ -.0:<7Y r d 1 10 1

! I !

i .3124 1 0.00 .3083 -. 0110 . 3075 -. 0 2 1 , . 7Qi i l I -.01+55, [ i 5 i I 1 I 1

_ -- . -. -i I----- --- ---a -- i

.0045

0.0000

.1124 -312G i

0.0000 .31iO

I .0076

.0038

.0022

. ? I 57

.3134

.3124

S u ~ p o s e t I ~ e t o t a l f ami ly i nzone x i s i i r i ~ c e n a s :he sdn, of n f z c t r s

i ~ l c o r n ~ s x , , Y.~, . . . . x t h e n from Thecrem 4 , ~ - 2 o b t a i n A n '

C i is t h e c o n c e n t r a t i o n i n d e x of t h e i - t h f & z f o r i n c c z : ~ ceni3onent b-hich b.2;

:can income . 111s e q u a t i o n e x p r e s s e s t h e Gin i- index of t i e t o t a l f ami ly

Income aa t h e weighted a v e r a g e of tlrc c o n c c l l t r a t i o n i n d i c e s of each, f a c t o r

income component, t h e we igh t8 b e i n g p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t i le zezn i xcone of e a c h

lke e q u a t i o n (4 .5 .1 ) czn be u sed t o a n a l y z e - : , c o n t r i S u t i o n of i n s j t z ' i i t y

o f each f a c t o r income t o t h e t o t a l I n e q u a l i t y . / Tc i i l u s t r e t e thi t r n m r r i c a i 2 . a =e

. , ~ i l i ~ e t h e d a t a obLained from t h e A u s t r a l i a n Survey of C o n s u ~ e r Expenditure 2nd

Finance, 1967-68.L/ The r e s u l t 8 a r e p r e a e n t e d i n Table 2 . I t is seen f r o 5 :he

: ab le t h a t t h e income f rom employment, i . e . , wages and s s ia r ies c o n t r i b u t e 92.687

t o t h e t o t a l i n e q u a l i t y . Unincorpora ted b u s i n e s s i n c o ~ e ii; sccond con t r i b c t -np

L l . i8X nlid t h e p r o p e r t y income, i . e . i n t e r e s t , d iv idend n x d rant c o n t r i b u t e ~ 7 r r I v

3 . 2 4 1 t o t h e t o t a l i n e q u a l i t y .

- - - - -- - . . - - - -- *I ' i h i * srohlern h a s a l s o been c o n s i d e r e d b y , i a n i a - z 0 ! 2 j 2r.c ?-.- i i 5 1 . . - 7 ' See Prydder and Kakvani i 8 1 .

L

' T ? . t . dt . lv ir lJ r q u a t i o n s o f t h e l i n e a r c x p e n d i t u r c ~ y s t t - n (LES) a r e gi-;::

5 y

vi p l y i 7- b i ( v - a ) ( L . 6 . l )

w!~erc v i - piqi i s t h e p e r c a p i r a e x p e n d i t c r e f o r t h e L- th c o r z c d i t p , pi n

Is i t s p r i c e a n d q i i s t h e p e r c n p i t a q u a n t i t y derar.cle.!. v = 1 piqi i e i=l

n

L p i y i i s t h e s d b s i s t e n c e e x p e n d i t c r e . t o t a l p e r c a p i t a e x p e n d i t u r e and a - ' I= 1

E i 1s i n t e r p r e t e d as t h e m a r g i n a l b u d g e t s h a r e of t h d i t ! c o m o d i t y .

T h e a b o v e s y s t e m o f demand e q u a t i o n s i s d e r i v e d by r n x i m i z i n g t h e b

K l e i n a n d Rubln [ 4 ] form o f t h e u t i l i t y f u n c t i o n .

n u = B i l o g ( q t - yi ) ( L . 6 . 2 )

i-1 n

I n r h l c h t h e 13's and y ' s are p a r a m e t e l 8 w i t h 0 < E l 1, B j = 1 , yl 2 0 i= 1

and q i - y i > 0.

Let G i b e t h e G i n i - i n d e x f o r t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e e x p e n d i t u r e sc

t h e i - t t l conin~odi ty and G* be the (;!~il-index f o r t h e t o t d l e r p c n d i t u r e , their

u s l n p C o r o l l a r y 6 nn t h e e q u a t i o n ( 4 . 6 . 1 ) we o b t a i n

* w t ~ c r c u 1s t h e m a n t o t a l e x p e n d i t u r e and u i i~ t h c rneen e x p e n d i t u r e ;.: - ' i

t h c i - t h cnrrmodit?. T l i i s e q u a t i o n car1 a l s o be w r i t t e n ds

t:xper!r!it UILP c l . t s t j c i t y of t h e i - t h c c ~ n o d l t y d t t h e mc3a-1 t s i ~ c n d ! t u r e s t~ t-i;;uzl

t o c t ~ r r a i i o o f t h e Ginl-indices of tile d j s t r i b ~ l t i o n s ni tLlc I-t:? c o m c d i ~ : :

e x p e n d i t u r e s and t h e t o t a l e x p e n d i t u r e r e s p e c t i v e l y . If t h e e l a s t i c i . t y i s

g r e a t e r ( l e s s ) chan one, t h e e x p e n d i t u r e on t h e i - t h c o m o d i t y is more ( l e s s )

r ~ n e l u ~ l l v d i s t r i b u t e d t'!ian t h e t o t a l e x p e n d i t u r e .

4 . 5 . 1 Tnconc I n e q u a l i t y and Pr-

We now c o n s i d e r t h e e f f e c t of p r i c e changes on t h e income i n e q u a l i t y

of t h e r e a l income.

S u b s t i t u t i n g (4.6.1) i n t o ( 4 . 6 . 2 ) , we o b t a i n t h e i n d i r e c t u t i l i t y

f u n c t i o n a s

* Suppose t h e p r i c e s pi change t o pi , and t h e t o t a l e x p e n d i t u r e -J I

chenges t o v*, t h e n t h e r e e u l t i n g change i n t h e u t i l i t y w i l l be

n h *

where s - 1 p i y i . I f t h e change i n u t i l i t y i s a e t t o r e m , we o b t a i n t h e i-1 .

t o t a l p e r c a p i t a e x p e n d i t u r e v* i n o r d e r t h a t t h e f ami ly m a i n t a i n s t h e same

- - v4 w i l l b e t h e - r e e l e x p e n d i t u r e . Le t GR b e t h 8 ~ i n i - i n d e x of t h e r e a l e-rn- - - . d l t u r e , t h e n a p p l y C o r o l l a r y 8 on t h i e e q u a t i o n g i v e s

s -

. * --.'ere i s t h e G in i - indsx of t h e ncney e x p e n d i t u r e i n t h e base y e a r .

Tr i s obvious from t h e e q u a t i o n ( 4 . 6 . 8 ) t h a t i f a l l t h e p r l c e s c;.ange

i n :he same p r o p o r t i o n GR - G* i . e . , t h e i n e q u a l i t y of t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of

t h e mozey e x p s n d i t u r e i n t h e b a s e y e a r is szme a s t h e i n 2 q u a l i t y of t h e r e a l

e x p e n d i t u r e .

* The r a t i o l- i s t h e t r u e c o s t of l i v i n g index.?j It c o n v e r t s t h e

v

money e x p e n d i t u r e i n t o real e x p e n d i t u r e . I n t h e s p i r i t o f t r u e c o ~ s t of l i v i r g

c.R index , we propoee t o u s e t h e r a t i o - u s an i ndex of t h e iccom~e i n e q u a l i t y G*

t o t a k e i n t o accoun t t h e e f f e c t s o f r e l a t i v e p r i c e changes . T i i ~ index c o n v e r t s

t h e i n e q u a l i t y of t h e money l iousehold e x p e n d i t u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n t o t h e i n e q u a l i t y

o f :he r e a l household e x p e n d i t u r e . I f t h i o i ndex i s l e s s t han one , i t i m p l i e s

t h a t t h e r e l a t i v e p r i c e changes a r e making t h e e x p e n a i t u r e d i s t r i b u t i o n more

i a e q u n l .

The numer i ca l r e s u l t s on t h e i n d e x o f ir.corne i n e q u a l i t y a r e p r e s e n t e d

i n Tab le 3. The U-K d a t a was used f o r t h i s purpose .? - / It i s eecn from t h e

t a b l e t h a t t h e r e l a t i v e p r i c e changee from 1964 t o 1972 have t h e e f f e c t o f

L i n c r e a s i n g income i n e q u a l i t y . The 1971-72 change f s p a r t i c u l a r l y a a r k c d .

4 . 6 . 2 Zrlcone I n e q u n l i t y and P r i c e s : An A l t e r n a t i v e Approach - - ' Z

Suppose t h e p r i c e of j - t t commodity changes by cl j p e r c e n t , t h e r f - - *

t h e dcmnnd f o r t h e i t commodity w i l l change by n i j a j percent:, v h e r e ) I -

r l i j i s t h e p r i c e e l a s t i c i t y of t h e i - t h c o m o d i t y w i t h r e s p e c t t o j - t h

p r l c e . -The r e s u l t i n g demand f o r t h e i - t h c o m o d i t y b e c o ~ e s

'/ See Kle ln and Rubin [ 4 1.

See X a e l l b a u e r [ 5 1 f o r t h e d e t a i l e d d e s c r i p t i o n of :b,c d t i r a .

Table 3: INDEX OF INCOME INEQUALITY IN U.K. 1964-72

.-, - - - T--

' --- - - - ,, r:hanpc I n Gin!- ' I i - , '~ '

- - --- Food 1 . 2 2 1

C l o t h i n g .037

I I !ousing --. 148 !

Durables - . l b 0 1 t

Others - 1 . 5 2 L I I I I

- ---- ----- -- ;

I C i h l e 6 g i v e s the p e r c e n t a g e c h a n g e 111 the Gini-j : :?~:: 5 : t>.t ril;,l P X ; ) ~ ~ Z -

d l t * rt. ~ I ' c l : thc p r i c e o f e a c h c o m o d i t y 11as Incrc;,stn4 t * . - ' .. .- ii t~~:e. 1s

!7cc.r. : l 4 . 3 t t h e p r i c e i n c r e a s e of foot- a n d c lo th i r rg i n c r c j t t . , r : , t incruaiity of

r{:,il e x r c n c i i t \ ~ r e w h i l e t he i n c r e a s e i n p r i c e of t h r e e oti,c.r g o c d s c e ; r a s e :kt

The e x p e n d i t u r e on t h e I - t h c o m d i t y a t base y e a r p r i c e s w i l l be

The t o t a l e x p e n d i t u r e is t h e n o b t a i n e d a s :

n where t h e u s e h a s been made o f t h e r e e t r i c t i o n 1 Si - 1 .

i- 1

Ad

L e t C;R b e t h e Gin i - index of t h e r e a l e x p e n d i t u r e , t h e n a p p l y h g

C o r o l l a r y on t h e e q u a t i o n (4.6.12) g i v e s

The e i rpreee ion (4.6.13) p r o . ~ i d e s t h e pe rcen tnge chnngc i n t h e Gin i - i r -dex

. of t h e r e a l e x p e n d i t u r e w h e n G h e p r i c e o f - t h e j - t h corvlaodity chsmgea by a + Z, 4

'2 o t h e r p r i c e s :remaining c o n s t a m . -

For t h e n u m e r i c a l i l l G t r a t l o n we used t h e d a t a o b t a i n e d from t h e !-lexica I

Household Survey conducted by t h e Bank o f Kexico in 1368. The f a a i l i e ~ con-

~ i d e r e d wcre urban e n t e r p r e n e u r s . The p a r a m e t e r s o f t h e l i n e a r e x p e n d i t u r e :;ye-

tern were s e t h t e d u s i n g i n d i v i d u a l o b s e r v a t i o n s ,

REFERENCES

( 1 1 Atkinaon, A.B. "On t h e Measurener't of I nequa l i t y H, JomaZ of E c o r m ~ c Theory, Vol. 2 , 1970.

i [ 2 ] DasGupte~, P. , A.K. Sen and S t a r r e t t , D . , "Notes on t h e Measurement o f

i Inequal i ty" , JournaZ of Economic l%eoq, Vol. 5, 1973.

[3] P ie , John C.H., Gustav Ranis and Sh i r l ey W. Kuo, "Grovth and the Family Distribution of Income by Fac tor Components: The Case of ~ a i v z i " , Economic Growth Center, Yale Univers i ty , March 1975 (mineo).

(41 Klein, 1L.R. and H. Rubin, "A Conatant U t i l i t y Index of t h e b s t of Living" , Review of Economic Studies, .W (1947-1948), 84-87.

[ 5 1 Muellbauer , J. , " Pr ices and Inequa l i t y : The United Kingdom I3per ienceW, The Economio Journal, Vol. 84, 'March 1974, 32-55.

[6 ] Mahalan~obis, P.C., "A Method of F r a c t i l e Graphical Analysis," E c m e t r i c a , 28, 1960, pp. 325-351.

[7] Roy, J . , I . M . Chakravar t i and R.G. Lana, "A Study of Concentration Curves ae Descr ipt ion of Consumer Pat tern" , Studies m Commer Behmn'oxr, Ind ian S t a t i s t i c a l I n s t i t u t e : Ca l cu t t a , 1959.

[8] Podder, N. and N.C. Kakwani, " Di s t r i bu t i on and Red i s t r i bu t i on of Household Income i n Austra l ia" , The Univers i ty of New South Wales (mimeo) Pebr-ry 1974.

[ 9 ] P y a t t , Graham, "On t h e I n t e r p r e t a t i o n nnd Diflaggregation of Gini Coeff i- c ien t s" , Development Research Center, The World Bank (mimeo), February 1975.

[ I ] Atkinson, A.B. "On t h e Measurement of I n e q u a l i t y H, Jouznai! of EcormLc Theory., Vol. 2, i970.

[ 2 ] DasGupta, P. , A.K. Sen and S t a r r e t t , D., "Notes on t h e Xeasurement of Inequa l i ty" , JournaZ of Economic -Theo~j, Vol. 5 , 1973.

(31 Pie , John C.H. , Gustav Ranis and S h i r l e y W. Kuo, "Grovth and t h e Family D i s t r i b u t i o n of Income by F a c t o r Components: The Carse o f Taiv-", Economic Growth Center , Yale U n i v e r s i t y , March 1975 (mimeo).

[ 4 ] Klein , L.R. end H. Rubin, "A Constant U t i l i t y Index of t h e Cost o f ~ i v ~ n g " , Review of Economic S t zd i e s , XV (1947-1948), 84-87.

[5] Muellbauer, J . , " Pr ices and I n e q u a l i t y : The Uni ted Kingdom Experience" , The Economic J m Z , Vol. 84, . March 1974, 32-55.

[ 6 ] Mehalanobis, P. C . , "A Method of F r a c t i l e Graph ica l Analysis ," Econmetrica, 28, 19160, pp. 325-351.

(71 Roy, J . , I . M . Chakravar t i and R.G. Laha, "A Study o f Concentra t ion Curves ae Deecr ip t ion o f Consumer Pa t t e rn" , Studies on Commer B e F d o l l r , I n d i a n S t a t i a ~ t i c a l I n s t i t u t e : C a l c u t t a , 1959.

(81 Podder, N. and N.C. Kakwani, " D i s t r i b u t i o n and R e d i s t r i b u ~ t i o n of 3ousehold Income! In Aust ra l i a" , The U n i v e r s i t y of New Soutll Wales (mfmeo) Fkbruary 1974.

[ 9 ] Pyatt:, Graham, "On t h e I n t e r p r e t a t i o n and Disaggregat ion of Gin1 C o e f f i - c iento" , Development Research Cen te r , The World Bnnk (rnioe!~), February 1975.