www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Voting Behaviour in Britain
Lynn Bennie
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
What are the main influences on voting in Britain?
• STUDIES OF VOTING BEHAVIOUR • THE BUTLER AND STOKES MODEL• VOTING BEHAVIOUR ‘FACTORS’• DEALIGNMENT AND REASONS FOR CHANGE• RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN ELECTION
STUDIES• TURNOUT• CONCLUSION: 2005 and Beyond
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
STUDIES OF VOTING BEHAVIOUR
Methods:
• Analysis of election results
• Voter surveys e.g. British Election Study. We have data on 40 years of elections.
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
BUTLER AND STOKES
• Political Change in Britain 1964, 1966, 1970
• Class and partisan id key i.e. long-term factors
• Importance of socialisation
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Class
• Central cleavage in society• 1966: of the 100 constituencies with
the largest % of manual workers, Lab won 99.
• Pulzer 1967: Class central determinant, ‘all else is embellishment and detail’.
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
VOTING BEHAVIOUR ‘FACTORS’
Long term ‘structural’ factors:• Class*• Religion• Sex• Age• (=PARTY ID & SOCIOLOGICAL
MODELS)
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Factors cont.
Short term:• Issues• Personalities• Leaders• Campaigns• The media• (=RATIONAL CHOICE MODELS)
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Social Cleavages
– Manual – non-manual– Worker – employer– Public sector – private sector– Centre – periphery– Secular – religious – Urban – rural– Material – post-material
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Ivor Crewe (in Bartle & King 2005)
• “There is no way of knowing, but there are ways of arriving at credible probabilities. One useful approach is to think of any election result as the product of long-term ‘structural’ factors and short-term ‘campaign’ factors.”
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Dealignment/ Change
• Decline in voter loyalty/class id/partisan id
• 1966: 46% ‘very strongly identified’ with a party. 2005: 8%
• But: Total with some id: 1966 94%; 2005 81%
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Other indicators of change
• Tactical voting: 17% of Lib Dems in 05.• Issue voting: Economy, Iraq war• Campaigns matter• Media • Decline in turnout• Rise in support for ‘other parties’.• Decline in party membership• Rise in general cynicism
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
= INCREASED VOLATILITY
• A ‘Restless Electorate’• 1997: Swing of 10% from Con to Lab =
double post-war record of ’79• ¼ of voters did not support same party• Rise in support for others• Move from habitual to judgemental voting
(Denver)
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Reasons: Bottom-up.
• Increase in education• Changing occupational and industrial
structures• Decline of working class• Increase in affluence• Cross-cutting pressures
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
But also Top-down
• Performance of governments• The Media• Leading to disillusionment
Overall = shift in balance between long-term (-) and short-term (+)
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Turnout
• 2001 = 59.2%. Lowest since 1918• 2005 – 61.3%• Generational change evident – decline
in ‘duty to vote’/ sense of civic duty in Thatcher and Blair generations
• So, turn-out likely to remain low???
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Recent BES evidence
• Harold Clarke et al 2004• Analyse entire series of BES• Note the general decline in sense of
civic duty• Decline of position politics and rise of
valence politics
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Position Politics
Involves issues on which the public take different sides e.g. privatisation, trade union rights. It was previously argued that voters assessed the parties on issues and voted for the party that was closest to their own position.
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Valence Politics
General judgements on party policies (the economy), party performance and leaders. Involves issues on which everyone is (more or less) agreed on the end to be pursued e.g. crime, peace and prosperity, corruption.
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Competence key
= general judgement on the relative competence of the parties to achieve desired ends.
= the politics of delivery, not fixed ideological positions
Labour seen as most competent, until now….
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Partisan id no longer important?
• Still important, but reconceptualised• ‘Valenced partisanship’• ‘A storehouse of accumulated party and party
leader performance evaluations’. • It is continuously updated as voters acquire new
information and react to events – voters continuously make judgements about the competence of parties, governments and leaders.
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Are old models at all relevant?
• YouGov polls ask if people ‘generally identify’ with any party – and 70% say yes.
• BES reveals that over 80% of voters still identify with one party
• Most survey respondents in BES are stable in their party id
• Still possible to identify ‘natural’ Lab & Con supporters, and at a constituency level point to Cons and Lab ‘heartlands’.
• So, ‘tribal voters’ still exist (Denver).
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
But VB more complicated now
• Greater turbulence within the electorate. • Non-voting phenomenon is a hot topic - we could
do more to understand this. • In 2005, the Gov’t was elected with the support of
only 21.6% of the eligible electorate i.e. non-voters (40%) out-number those who voted for the winning party by nearly 2 to 1.
• Has led to much debate in parties and universities = democratically legitimate??
www.abdn.ac.uk/sras
Conclusion
• Top-level political scientists simply debate the importance of different factors and influences.
• Most do not/ cannot offer definitive conclusions.