www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
A Fair Test of the IAPT LTC/MUS Pathfinders
IAPT data GBU analysis?
Professor Simon Jones
Ms Eleni Theodorou
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
Objectives:
To : • Share our outline analysis plan• What data to we have for the evaluation? • What is Good, Bad, or Ugly?
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
Subgroups of interest
Long term condition
Medically unexplained symptom
Yes No
Yes
No
Question: How can we identify people in the various groups?•Data sources•Fields and Codes •GBU analysis
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
Data Analysis for LTC & MUS service usersFor each of the subgroups•Socio-Demographics profile•Common mental health problems and other comorbidities •describe duration and type of intervention •outcomes of intervention •explore and quantify relations between independent/predictor variables •Question: Are there any other analysis which you would find useful?
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
Outcome scales
• Personal Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) • Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
score • Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Score (W&SAS) Question: Which outcome is the
most appropriate for MUS/LTC?• GBU analysis
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
Data Validation Study
Primary care services
• Use of medication • Psychotropic • Non-psychotropic • Referral rate
Acute/Secondary Services
• Outpatient activity• In-patient activity• Accident and
Emergency activity
Validate the self-reported co-morbidities from IAPT dataset a against CHOICE (NIHR Programme Grant) data set based on routinely collected primary and secondary healthcare data sets (i.e. Doncaster and Newham).
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
Economic analysisTo ascertain the cost-effectiveness of the service in improving the outcomes of the different patient sub-groups•Convert PHQ-9 into QALYs
– See Brazier, Yang , Tsuchiya , Rowen (2010) A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures, Eur J Health Econ.
•To validate the map between PHQ-9 and EQ-5D we will also seek to identify a dataset where both PHQ-9 and EQ-5D are measured and observed and can be regressed along with interaction and polynomial effects to account for non-linearity and other confounding variables.
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
IAPT Highlight Report
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
IAPT MDS - Personal and demographic detailsM/R Data Set Data Elements
R NHS NUMBER R NHS NUMBER STATUS INDICATOR CODE M LOCAL PATIENT IDENTIFIER M ORGANISATION CODE (CODE OF PROVIDER) M PERSON BIRTH DATE R PERSON GENDER CODE CURRENT M POSTCODE OF USUAL ADDRESS R GENERAL MEDICAL PRACTICE CODE (PATIENT REGISTRATION) R ETHNIC CATEGORY R RELIGIOUS OR OTHER BELIEF SYSTEM AFFILIATION CODE R SEXUAL ORIENTATION (CURRENT) R EX-BRITISH ARMED FORCES INDICATOR
RLONG TERM PHYSICAL HEALTH CONDITION INDICATOR (IMPROVING ACCESS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES)
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
IAPT MDS - Disability
M/R Data Set Data Elements R NHS NUMBER R LOCAL PATIENT IDENTIFIER R ORGANISATION CODE (CODE OF PROVIDER) R DISABILITY CODE
01 Behaviour and Emotional02 Hearing03 Manual Dexterity04 Memory or ability to concentrate, learn or understand (Learning Disability)05 Mobility and Gross Motor06 Perception of Physical Danger07 Personal, Self Care and Continence 08 Progressive Conditions and Physical Health (such as HIV, cancer, multiple sclerosis, fits etc)09 Sight10 SpeechXX OtherNN No DISABILITYZZ Not Stated (PERSON asked but declined to provide a response)
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
IAPT MDS - Referral detailsM/R Data Set Data Elements R NHS NUMBER M LOCAL PATIENT IDENTIFIER M ORGANISATION CODE (CODE OF PROVIDER) M SERVICE REQUEST IDENTIFIER R REFERRAL REQUEST RECEIVED DATE R SOURCE OF REFERRAL FOR MENTAL HEALTH R SERVICE REQUEST ACCEPTANCE INDICATOR R ORGANISATION CODE (CODE OF COMMISSIONER) R PROVISIONAL DIAGNOSIS (ICD)
RYEAR AND MONTH OF SYMPTOMS ONSET (IMPROVING ACCESS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES) R PREVIOUS SYMPTOM INDICATOR
RIMPROVING ACCESS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES CARE SPELL END CODE
REND DATE (IMPROVING ACCESS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES)
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
IAPT MDS- Appointment detailsM/R Data Set Data Elements
R NHS NUMBER M LOCAL PATIENT IDENTIFIER
MORGANISATION CODE (CODE OF PROVIDER) M SERVICE REQUEST IDENTIFIER
M APPOINTMENT DATE
RCARE PROFESSIONAL ROLE CODE (IMPROVING ACCESS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES) M ATTENDED OR DID NOT ATTEND CODE
RCLINICAL CONTACT DURATION OF APPOINTMENT
RAPPOINTMENT TYPE (IMPROVING ACCESS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES) R CONSULTATION MEDIUM USED
R
THERAPY TYPE (IMPROVING ACCESS TO PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES)
(Up to four types may be recorded for each APPOINTMENT)R EMPLOYMENT STATUS
REMPLOYMENT SUPPORT SUITABILITY INDICATOR R EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT REFERRAL DATE
R PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION USAGE
R STATUTORY SICK PAY INDICATOR R PHQ-9 TOTAL SCORE
RGENERALISED ANXIETY DISORDER SCORE
RWORK AND SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT SCALE SCORE
RAGORAPHOBIA MOBILITY INVENTORY SCORE (WHEN ACCOMPANIED)
RAGORAPHOBIA MOBILITY INVENTORY SCORE (WHEN ALONE) R AGORAPHOBIA SCORE
RGENERALISED ANXIETY DISORDER PENN STATE WORRY SCORE
RHEALTH ANXIETY INVENTORY SHORT WEEK SCALE SCORE
ROBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER INVENTORY SCORE
RPANIC DISORDER SEVERITY SCALE SCORE
RPOST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER IMPACT OF EVENTS SCALE REVISED SCORE
R SOCIAL PHOBIA INVENTORY SCORE R SOCIAL PHOBIA SCORE R SPECIFIC PHOBIA SCORE
www.clininf.euwww.surrey.ac.uk
Thanks for listening
Simon Jones
Acknowledgements:
XXX