EFFECT OF MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS ON
PERFORMANCE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN KENYA: A CASE
OF BODABODA BUSINESS IN NAIROBI COUNTY
BY
GOK YANG RUATHDEL
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA
FALL 2019
EFFECT OF MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS ON
PERFORMANCE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN KENYA: A CASE
OF BODABODA BUSINESS IN NAIROBI COUNTY
BY
GOK YANG RUATHDEL
A Research Project Report Submitted to the Chandaria School of
Business in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of
Masters in Business Administration (MBA)
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA
FALL 2019
ii
STUDENT’S DECLARATION
I, the undersigned, declare that this is my original work and has not been submitted to any
other college, institution, or university other than the United States International
University in Nairobi for academic credit.
Signed: ________________________ Date: ______________________
Gok Yang Ruathdel (653957)
This project has been presented for examination with my approval as the appointed
supervisor.
Signed: ________________________ Date: ______________________
Timothy Okech, PhD
Signed: ________________________ Date: ______________________
Dean, Chandaria School of Business
iii
DEDICATION
This project is dedicated to my family, and my kind heartily sponsor who open wide the
way of my dreams through his continuing support of my education. Also to my brother
Tut yang who selflessly provides my needs. To my dearest and lovely wife Nyamal Gach
Pal who usually rob her precious sleeping time waiting for me to making sure I reach
home safely from school. I also to my mother Elder Mary Nyachin Mut who constantly
help me in prayer for God to give me strength to finish my study. I dedicate this work to
you all my beloved family
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With the best efforts I have taken on this project. It would not have been possible without
the kind support and guidance of several individual who immensely contributed to my
success. I would like to express my utmost thanks to all of them. First of all, I would like
to thanks the almighty father who the depth of both riches wisdoms and knowledge found
in Him. For giving me the opportunity, strength and health to work on my project.
I would like to express my special recognition to my dearest brother Tut Yang and my
sponsor David Leitch for their kind contribution toward my study that made me to the
completion of this project. Special thanks goes to United States International University
for giving me this rear Opportunity to undertake me Master in Business Administration in
this wonderful institution.
I would also like to give special thanks to my supportive supervisor Prof. Okech for his
excellent guidance and timely supervision, for giving me the best ideas and all the
information needed in my project. With his encouragement and support from the initial to
the end of my project has exposed me in to valuable ideas about the research and
understand more of the project. Lastly but not the lease, I offer my regard to all those who
supported me in any respect on my project work and as well as in the whole study of this
Master in Business Administration. Thanks you all!
v
ABSTRACT
The general objective of this study was to determine the effect of microfinance banks on
the development of entrepreneurship in Kenya, the case of bodaboda business in Nairobi.
The study was guided by the following research objectives: to examine factors affecting
access to finance on performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs in Roysambu and Safari
Park Area, to find out how lending policies of micro financial institution affects
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs in Roysambu and Safari Park Area; and to
determine the effect of capacity building of micro financial institution affects
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs in Roysambu, Safari Park, Githurai, Kahawa
and Kahawa West areas.
A descriptive research design was used because it helps the researcher find out the what,
who, where, when or how much. Target population used 169 bodaboda operators in
Royambu and Safari Park. Clustered random sampling was used and a quota of 30%
which was drawn from each strata thus, giving us a sample size of 48 respondents.
Questionnaires were used to collect data. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Pearson correlation and regression analysis was used to determine the influence of
independent variables on the dependent variable.
The findings on factors affecting access to finance and its effect on performance of
Bodaboda entrepreneurs revealed that majority of respondents agreed that they started
their business using their savings and they usually disclose information regarding their
business when applying for a loan. Respondents could however not reach an agreement
on due to lack of enough cash flow from their business they prefer taking loan from
friends and family. Respondents started their business using money from family.
Respondents also disagreed on they keep good business records that help them access
finance easily from micro financial institutions and they maintain proper financial record.
The findings on how lending policies of micro financial institution affects performance of
Bodaboda entrepreneurs showed that respondents agreed that due to lack of collateral
respondents get loans from other sources. Consider the amount of interest rates charged
before seeking finance. However, respondents could not reach an agreement on micro
financial intuitions transaction costs are usually higher, discouraged to apply for a loan
because they usually give them less money than what they requested, do not like to apply
vi
for loans due to complex application procedures and do not take loans due to short loan
repayment.
The findings on effect of capacity building of micro financial institution affects
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs. Respondent agreed that training has helped
them grow their business and sales. Through networking respondents were able to share
knowledge and learn new skills. However, respondents were not sure on training offered
by microfinance institutions to help them understand procedures that are related to loan
application, applying for a loan as a group is easy because respondents can get co
guarantors and keeping the right network has enabled respondents get access to. The
study also showed that respondent disagreed on they have a business plan that they can
use when applying for money from microfinance institutions.
The study concluded that a lot of entrepreneurs started their business using their savings
and they also disclose information regarding their business when applying for a loan.
Training has helped Bodaboda entrepreneurs grow their business and sales and it has also
helped them understand terms and conditions required before applying for a loan.
However, entrepreneurs prefer loans from friends and family due to lack of enough cash
flow. Respondents get loan form other financial institutions due to lack of collateral and
they also consider the amount of interest rate offered. Transaction costs are high. MFI’s
offer Short loan repayment period and respondents do not have a business plan that they
can use when applying for loans form microfinance institutions.
It was recommended that MFIs should conduct an awareness campaign to encourage
Bodaboda operators to save more. MFIs and government to come up with a strategy to
provide entrepreneurs with loans at a lower interest rate, reduce the transaction cost,
increase repayment period, make the application process user friendly and easy and
minimize penalty charged to businesses that are not able to repay their loans on time and
MFIs should offer entrepreneurs short courses.
The study only focused on effect of microfinance institutions on performance of
entrepreneurship in Kenya and it looked at factors affecting access to finance, lending
policy and capacity building. Very few studies have been done on capacity building
therefore, more studied should be done. In addition, research should also be done to
identify other factors that might affect performance of entrepreneurship in terms of access
to finance.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
STUDENT’S DECLARATION ..................................................................................................... ii
DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................................ iv
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... v
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. vii
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... ix
LIST OF FIGUERS ........................................................................................................................ x
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background of the Study ......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem ........................................................................................................ 4
1.4 Specific Objectives .................................................................................................................... 5
1.6 The Scope of the Study ............................................................................................................. 6
1.7 Definition of Terms.................................................................................................................. 6
1.8 Chapter Summary .................................................................................................................... 7
CHAPTER TWO ............................................................................................................................ 8
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................................ 8
2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 8
2.2 Access to Finance and Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs ....................................... 8
2.3 Lending Policy on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs ........................................... 12
2.4 Capacity Building on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs ...................................... 16
2.5 Chapter Summary .................................................................................................................. 21
CHAPTER THREE ..................................................................................................................... 22
3.0 RESEARCH METHODLOGY ............................................................................................. 22
3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 22
3.2 Research Design ...................................................................................................................... 22
3.3 Population and Sampling Design .......................................................................................... 22
3.4 Data Collection Methods ........................................................................................................ 24
3.5 Research Procedure................................................................................................................ 25
3.6 Chapter Summary .................................................................................................................. 25
CHAPTER FOUR ........................................................................................................................ 27
4.0 RESULTS AND FINDINGS .................................................................................................. 27
4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 27
viii
4.2 General Information .............................................................................................................. 27
4.3 Factors Affecting Access to Finance ..................................................................................... 30
4.4 Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs ........................................................... 34
4.5 Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurs ...................................................... 38
4.6 Financial Performance ........................................................................................................... 42
4.7 Chapter Summary .................................................................................................................. 43
CHAPTER FIVE .......................................................................................................................... 44
5.0 SUMMARY, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................ 44
5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 44
5.2 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 44
5.3 Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 46
5.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 52
5.5 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 53
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 55
APPENDIX I: QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................................................. 68
APPENDIX II: NACOSTI CERTIFICATE .............................................................................. 72
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Population Size ............................................................................................. 23
Table 3.2: Sample Size .................................................................................................. 24 Table 4.1: Response Rate .............................................................................................. 27
Table 4.2: Descriptive Statistics of Factors Affecting Access to Finance ....................... 32 Table 4.3: Correlation between Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurs ................................................................................................................ 33
Table 4.4: Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance
of Entrepreneurs ............................................................................................................ 33
Table 4.5: Anova of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurs ................................................................................................................ 34
Table 4.6: Coefficients of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurs ................................................................................................................ 34
Table 4.7: Descriptive Statistics of Lending Policy ........................................................ 36
Table 4.8: Correlation between Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs ....... 37
Table 4.9: Regression Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs ...................... 37
Table 4.10: Anova of Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs ...................... 38
Table 4.11: Coefficients of Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs .............. 38
Table 4.12: Descriptive Statistics of Capacity Building ................................................. 40
Table 4.13: Correlation between Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurs . 41
Table 4.14: Regression Analysis of Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurs
...................................................................................................................................... 41
Table 4.15: Anova of Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurship ............. 42
Table 4.16: Coefficients of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurship ........................................................................................................... 42
Table 4.17: Descriptive Statistics of Financial Performance ........................................... 43
x
LIST OF FIGUERS
Figure 4.1: Age ............................................................................................................. 28
Figure 4.2: Gender......................................................................................................... 28
Figure 4.3: Marital Status .............................................................................................. 29
Figure 4.4: Highest Level of Education ......................................................................... 29
Figure 4.5: Years of Business Operation ........................................................................ 30
Figure 4.6 Finances you have accessed .......................................................................... 30
1
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Microfinance is the process of providing financial services such as micro-credit, micro-
saving or micro-insurance to poor people. Ogunleye (2009) define Microfinance as small
scale financial services that involve mainly savings and credit services to the poor.
Microfinance is a financial institution that provides financial services to enterprenuers
who are not able to get banking and other associated services (Malach, Lerner &
Schwartz, 2010). In addition, entrepreneurs are able to get financial services through
relationship based banking and group-based models. Relationship based banking is
offered to individual entrepreneurs and small businesses and group-based models are
offered to a group of entrepreneurs and small businesses to apply for loan and other
services (Malach et al., 2010).
Microfinance institutions (MFIs) are institutions, registered to provide microfinance
services such as loans, domestic funds transfer and other financial services to micro,
small and medium enterprises to run and expand their business (Muogbo & Tomola,
2018). According to Kibas (2004), MFIs can be classified as Non-Governmental
Organizations (NGOs), Savings and Credit Co-operative (SACCOs), banks and
Community Based Organizations (CBOs). They provide financial services such as
savings, loans and insurance to enterprises in the form of micro credit. According to
World Bank (2010), there are around 900 microcredit institutions in 101 countries that
offer loans to the world’s poor. Some microfinance institution however are reluctant
offering their services to people in rural areas due to poor infrastructure, high risk and
high cost of operation (World Bank, 2010).
The main objective of microfinance institutions is to create a good environment for the
low income self-employed and near-poor households and provide them with an
opportunity to access credit, savings, insurance, and general banking services (Rukaria,
2015). MFIs are key players in entrepreneurship development; it is recommended that
microfinance institutions (MFIs) should package their services together (financial and
2
non-financial) in order to positively boost growth of Micro Small and Medium
Enterprises (MSMEs) (Kushoka, 2013). Akm (2016) states that there are around 742
NGOs in Bangladesh that are authorized to operate microcredit program. The NGOs are
involved in developing credit-based productive and income generating projects to
encourage women become entrepreneurs and provide access to supportive services
hence, reduce poverty in rural areas and empower women to start their own businesses.
However, Mallick (2002) indicated that microcredit institutions were created in rural
communities in Bangladesh to increase economic and social development. Moreover,
Bangladesh has around 20,000 NGOs, associations, credit groups and cooperatives.
Around 2116 NGOs offer microfinance to poor people living in rural areas at a lower cost
to improve borrowers’ economic conditions (Mazumder & Wencong, 2013). In
Netherlands, Chiyah and Forchu (2010) postulated that microfinance institutions offers
people new opportunities by enabling them to get and secure finance hence, give them an
opportunity to grow and increase their profits. It also increases economic and social
development by improving peoples living conditions. In a report by European
Commission (2013), access to finance was considered a key determinant for business
start-up, development and growth for enterprises. Enterprises have different needs and
faces different financial challenges as compared to large businesses.
In Africa, Sakthi (2011) found that 6% of Africans borrow money to start a business and
13% borrow to buy food. Moreover, 50% of the population live with less than 1US$ or
less per day and most Africans lack the understanding of what it would take to successful
entrepreneurs. Morover, they lack necessary technical management skills and confidence.
They also lack personal ambition and willingness for fear of sharing ownership and failed
to form partnership whereas, Oseph (2014) indicated that in Ethiopia, microfinance
institutions (MFIs) were developed to resolve credit access problem that entrepreneurs
face. Microfinance institutions were also developed to help people and business to
manage available assets on a continuous basis. In addition, access to financial services
allows existing businesses to grow and provides starting capital for businesses that are
starting. Furthermore, Abdel, Abdimajid and Ali (2013) suggested that in Mogadishu
microfinance institution should set flexible, affordable and attractive requirements in
financing small businesses thus, motivate entrepreneurs to borrow.
3
In Nigeria, Ojo (2009) noted that microfinance institutions play a big role in the financial
industry. It has a positive effect on individuals, business organization and other financial
institutions. Hala (2018) asserted that in Egypt microfinance institutions plays a big role
in the financial industry and it also has a positive effect on individuals, business, other
financial institutions, government and economy. However, in Mogadishu, a study done by
Yasin, (2013) established that requirement put in place by microfinance institutions
prevents them from borrowing money. In addition, most enterprises are not able to meet
the requirements set by the Microfinance institutions. Muogbo and Tomola (2018) also
noted that some of the challenges that micro-financing institutions are facing in Nigeria
includes; high operating cost, repayment problem, inadequate experienced credit staff,
and lack of re-financing facilities and internal control challenge.
In Kenya, Mwangi (2011) postulate that Microfinance movement started in the late 1980s
as a result of exclusion of large proportion of the population from the formal financial
institution such as banks. Microfinance was developed to fill the gap left by banks in
providing credit to individuals, micro, small and medium enterprises which were
growing during this period. In addition, in Kenya, Microfinance institutions were
developed by NGO or a Savings and Credit Cooperative Society Framework. MFIs are a
source of credit for low income households and enterprises in rural and urban areas of
Kenya (Wambugu & Ngugi. 2012). MFIs also gained reputation in Kenya because formal
banking sector saw informal sector as risky and not commercially viable Ogindo (2006).
Moreover, new, innovative and pro-poor methods of financing low-income households
and MSEs were developed by MFIs to encourage them to take finances. MFIs have also
greatly contributed to social-economic empowerment to the beneficiaries and their
dependents (Kamau, 2010).
Access to credit as start capital has grown especially to entrepreneurs in Kenya. However,
most small scale businesses lack adequate funds to grow and expand due to difficulties in
accessing credit facilities from financial institutions they provide a number of services
including book keeping, basic management, access to market and skills development
(Mokua, 2013). Mbithe (2013) established that financing offered by MFIs in Kenya helps
entrepreneur’s access loans and offers favorable interest hence create opportunities for
them to grow and expand. In addition, some of the obstacles that enterprises face include;
4
poor financial management skills, financial literacy and unable to document their business
operations and perform basic accounting
Bodaboda is a common means of transport used in Kenya. They are around 600,000
commercial motorcycles in Kenya (Bodaboda Safety Association of Kenya, 2019). The
industry grew significantly in 2008 due to the inability of Kenyan transport
system’s to fully meet the commuters’ transportation needs (Kumar & Barret, 2008).
In addition, the increase is attributed to the higher registration of motor and auto cycles as
a result of the zero rating of all motorcycles below 250 cc in 2008. Through this, the
Kenyan government was able to increase both rural and urban transport and create job
(Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2010). The industry has also contributed around
Sh219 Billion in revenue in the economy (Bodaboda Safety Association of Kenya, 2019).
Motorcycles function in areas where other modes of transport may not be available. They
serve as taxis and they are reliable and convenient irrespective of time, type of road,
distance or destination and in addition, they are readily available (Kumar & Barret, 2008).
1.2 Statement of the Problem
Microfinance is a source of financial services for startup entrepreneurs and small
businesses owners lacking access to banking services and other forms of financial credit.
Enterprises need financial and non-financial services. Sievers and Vanderbay (2004)
suggested that Microfinance has become major support in the sustenance and survival of
small enterprises in Kenya. Ojo (2009) in his study on impact of microfinance on
entrepreneurial development it was indicated that in Nigeria there was a significant
difference between the number of entrepreneurs who used microfinance institutions and
those who do not use them, there is a significant effect of microfinance institutions
activities in predicting entrepreneurial productivity; and that there is no significant effect
of microfinance institutions activities in predicting entrepreneurial development.
Omwono, Maizs and, Toroitich (2016) investigated the effect of microfinance services on
entrepreneurship development in Uasin-Gishu County Kenya. It was revealed that there
was a positive effect on entrepreneurship development.
Onyango (2011) conducted a research on the role of microfinance institutions in the
growth of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). A case of SMEs in Gikomba Market it
was revealed that microfinance institutions played an important role in the growth of
5
small medium enterprises by providing the following services seed capital, financial skills
training, role models and mobilization of savings. It was recommended that microfinance
institutions should play a larger role in the provision of seed capital which is mainly
provided by relatives. A lot of research has been done of microfinance and performance
but none has been done on Bodaboda operators. According to a study done by Kabahanga
(2013), it was recommended that there was need for a study to be done on effect of micro
finance institutions on performance of entrepreneurship in Kenya thus bridge a gap and
more knowledge that can be used for further study.
1.3 General Objective
The general objective of the study was to determine the effect of microfinance institutions
on performance of entrepreneurship by bodaboda operators in Roysambu, Safari Park,
Githurai, Kahawa and Kahawa West areas.
1.4 Specific Objectives
1.4.1 To examine factors affecting access to finance and its effect on performance of
Bodaboda entrepreneurs.
1.4.2 To find out how lending policies of micro financial institution affects performance
of Bodaboda entrepreneurs.
1.4.3 To determine the effect of capacity building of micro financial institution affects
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs.
1.5 Importance of the Study
The study was of importance to the following;
1.5.1 Government of Kenya
A national long-term development blueprint to create a globally competitive and
prosperous nation with a high quality of life by 2030, that aims to transform Kenya into a
newly industrializing, middle-income country providing a high quality of life to all its
citizens by 2030 in a clean and secure environment. This project will also highlight keys
section that contribute largely in poverty reduction inline the government vision for 2030
blue print goals therefore every sector that contribution a significant amount to the
6
economic need to be taken care of. It will educate the government on how to put attention
to promote this section of the economic.
1.5.3 Microfinancial Institutions
The Microfinance institution will understand the benefit of lending to the bodaboda
operators financial loan to continue expanding their businesses. Provide assistant to start
up their business in other sectors and makes more return back to the household as well as
national economic of the country.
1.5.4 Ministry of Transport
The minister of transport will be able to consider the operation of the bodaboda transport
to supplements the gap that already exists in the transport industry and provide clear
guidelines that will governance the bodaboda operation.
1.6 The Scope of the Study
The study sought to determine the effect of microfinance banks on the development of
entrepreneurship in Kenya. The study targeted 164 bodaboda operators located in
Roysambu and Safari Park area. The study was conducted in the month of September and
December 2019.
1.7 Definition of Terms
1.7.1 Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship is the process where individuals start and manage a business enterprise
in spite of obstacles they are going through to make profit (Kilby, 2012).
1.7.2 Microfinance
Microfinance is a financial institution that provides financial services to business that are
not able to get banking and other associated services (Malach et al., 2010).
1.7.3 Lending Policies
Lending policy is a statement of philosophy, standards, and guidelines that employees
must observe in granting or refusing a lending request (Munyiri, 2010).
7
1.7.4 Access to Credit
Access to credit is the ease of getting money or either personal use or business use
(Sakwa, 2017).
1.8 Chapter Summary
This chapter has discussed in details the background of the study, statement of the
problem, general objective and how the study was beneficial to other organizations. The
chapter has also outlined the scope of the study with the objective ofdetermining the
effect of microfinance banks on the development of entrepreneurship in Kenya. Chapter
two reviewed literature based on research objective under study and chapter three
analyzed research methodology that was used. Chapter four coved results and findings,
while chapter five provides the summary, discussion, conclusion and recommendations.
8
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This chapter discusses literature review based on the following research objectives; to
examine the effect of access to credit on performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs, to find
out how lending policies of micro financial institution affects performance of Bodaboda
entrepreneurs and to determine the effect of capacity building of micro financial
institution affects performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs.
2.2 Access to Finance and Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
2.2.1 Size Firm
Size of a firm is how big or small a firm is in regards to the number of employees, capital
and also asset the firm has. According to a survey done on SME financing in Canada it
was revealed that the size of business irrespective of age has a strong influence on
financial structure (Sakwa, 2017). Self-employed businesses had the highest form of
informal financing, 37% use personal credit cards, 36% use their own personal savings
while 34% used commercial loans. This implies that small businesses depend on informal
financing such as business owner’s savings and personal credit facilities. But as firms
grow to medium size enterprises they start relaying on formal commercial instruments,
trade credit from suppliers and the resources of the business (Gichuki, 2012).
It is costly for smaller firms to resolve information asymmetries with debt providers.
Therefore, small firms will be offered less debt capital as compared to larger firms.
Transaction cost may also be higher. In addition, smaller firms are also not able to raise
capital because they are not able to reach capital markets due to their size (Cassar, 2004).
According to studies done by Kakuru (2013), claims that small and medium enterprises
face financial challenges as compared to large businesses. In addition, small firms are not
able to provide financial information, because it is owned and operated by the owner, they
have fewer assets and they lack legal requirement to regularly report financial information
and also lack audited financial accounts.
Older firms provide financial information which can be used by financial institutions to
determine their credit worthiness however, it is usually difficult and cost effective for
9
SME’s to access bank financing due to information asymmetry (Beal & Goyen, 2015).
According to Fatoki and Odeyemi (2010), studies have shown that demographic factors
such as; size, ownership type, age and sector influence the access to finance. Small firms
have more credit limitations as compared to large firms. Small firms are owned and
operated by private individuals who have no legal obligation to report financial
performance or to regularly audit their financial accounts. Small firms also have fewer
assets to provide as collateral and they are also linked with high failure rates as compared
to large firms (Pandula, 2011).
Smaller and younger entrepreneurs usually encounter higher cost of financing and are
also required to produce collateral however; smaller entrepreneurs have fewer assets to
offer as collateral (Berger & Udell, 2002). Zarook, Rahman and Khanam (2013) in their
study on the impact of demographic factors on accessing finance in Libya's SMEs. The
study revealed that there is a positive relationship between size of a firm and SMEs
access to finance. Essien and Chukwuemeka (2012) in their analysis on access to credit
markets and the performance of small scale agro-based enterprises in the Niger delta
region of Nigeria. Multistage sampling technique was used. Data was collected from 264
respondents. It was revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between
access to finance and size of a firm.
According to a study done by Morobe (2015), on the effect of micro finance loans on the
financial performance of small and medium enterprises in Nairobi County. The study
used descriptive research. Total population was 5,596 SMEs. Stratified random sampling
technique was used to select a sample of 357 respondents. It was revealed that age of the
SME’s and credit accessibility affects performance of the SME. Oliveira and Fortunato
(2006) found that small firms face financial limitation which affects their growth and
development in the long run. Moreover, small firms are also not able to make use of
economies of scale as compared to large firms. This is because small firms do not have
sufficient cash flow and are not able to depend on bank financing but depends on their
own equity investment. Kira and Zhongzhi (2012) in their study on the impact of firm
characteristics in access of financing by small and medium-sized enterprises in Tanzania.
Findings showed that firm’s access to finance is affected by location, industry, age, size
and collateral.
10
2.2.2 Ownership Structure
SME’s are classified based on legal structure such as sole ownership; partnership and
proprietary. In Bhutan SMEs are classified based on the size of the initial cost of
investment of the firm and number of employees (Ministry of Economic Affairs & Asian
Development Bank, 2012). Onyango (2010) postulated that MSEs and SMEs are in the
same group as MSMEs. SME’s has 100 or less employees. They are also grouped into
sole-proprietorship, partnership or unlisted companies thus, making it hard for capital
markets and money markets to make investments. Firms’ sources of finance changes as
time go. Moreover, most firms usually start as family owned business and use their
savings and family finance. The business then grows and they start seeking for funds
from other Microfinance institutions. With time it becomes well established and starts
keeping good business records, developed accounting systems, establish a legal identity
and start seeking finance form financial institutions (Onyango, 2010).
According to a study done by Macharia (2012), on the effects of access to finance on
micro and small enterprises investment growth in Ongata Rongai Township. The study
found that in financing of the micro and small business, family and friends played a big
role in helping business owners to boost their operations with an average of 40% of the
finances coming from them, an average of 24% came from Microfinance institutions
while on average 30% of the finances were from business savings. Bello (2012) argued
that increasing access to saving is important because it helps the people who come from
poor areas that have not qualified for Microfinance services, to save with Microfinance
institutions thus, be able to access micro-credit and alleviate poverty.
A research done by Musamali and Tarus (2013) on does firm profile influence financial
access among small and medium enterprises in Kenya. Target population was 515 SMEs
in Eldoret Town. The study collected data from 203 respondents. The study revealed that
firm profile such as; business type, ownership structure; size of the firm and age of the
business influence SMEs’ access to finance. Charilaos (2017) examined ownership
structure and access to finance in developing countries, applied economics. The results
revealed that ownership structure is a significant predictor of firms’ access to finance.
Pierluigi and Valentina (2017) in their study on "family firms and access to credit. The
study revealed that family owned firms are more likely to experience difficulty accessing
credit from financial institutions.
11
2.2.3 Information Asymmetry
Information asymmetry is the process where one group of participants has better or
timelier information than other groups (Bushee & Leuz, 2005). Joseph (2013) noted that
financial characteristics such as business registration, accurate documentation of
transaction and financial activities as well as good business planning have a positive
correlation with credit accessibility. Schayek (2011) claim that most SME’s
owners/managers are very sensitive about disclosing information relating to their firm’s
financial performance. According to Mazanai and Fatoki (2012), start-up SMEs are
usually affected by information asymmetry problems because information is usually
inadequate and not transparent. New SMEs are also unwilling to provide full information
about their business therefore, limiting them from accessing finance from financial
institutions.
Entrepreneurs are more likely to be affected by information asymmetry problems.
Moreover, information asymmetries are common in new and technology-based
propositions. It occurs when manufacturing or technology based firms, are reluctant to
provide full information because they fear that disclosure may make it easier for their
competitors to exploit (Deakinset, North, Baldock & Whittam, 2008). Aunga (2017) in
their study on challenges facing small scale entrepreneurs in accessing loan from banks at
Ngongongare, Meru District, Arusha Region in Tanzania. It was revealed that lack of
adequate accounting information is one of the challenges that small scale entrepreneurs
are facing while accessing loans from financial institutions.
Entrepreneurs are facing a challenge to access finance from financial institutions due to
lack of sufficient information that is needed and transparency hence, hindering their
growth and development (Canton, Grilo, Monteagudo & Van der Zwan, 2013). Beck,
BeckDemirgüç-Kunt and Singer (2013) in their study on is small beautiful? Financial
structure, size and access to finance it was revealed that information asymmetry is caused
by poor accounting records, lack of audited financial statements and inadequate access to
SMEs information from credit bureaus. Cheng, Ya and Zhifei (2014) conducted an
analysis on financing difficulties for SMEs due to asymmetric information. Findings
revealed that access to finance is affected by information asymmetry.
12
In a study done by Gichure (2016) on financial market failure constraints and access to
finance by small and medium enterprises in Kenya. The study used correlation and
descriptive design. Target population was 120,000 SMEs. Purposive, stratified and simple
random sampling were used to select 384 SME. The study revealed that the SMEs faced
challenges in accessing finance due to information asymmetry. Nanyondo, Kamukama,
Nkundabanyanga and Tauringana (2014) examined quality of financial statements,
information asymmetry, perceived risk and access to finance by Ugandan SMEs. It was
established that there was a significant and positive relationship between quality of
financial statements and access to finance and a significant and negative relationship
between information asymmetry and access to finance.
2.3 Lending Policy on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
2.3.1 Collateral
Collateral is the degree to which assets are committed by borrowers to a lender as a
security so that they can pay their debt (Gitman, 2003). The assets used as security are
used to recover the principle a borrower is not able to pay back the loan he or she
borrowed. Entrepreneurs offer security such as houses, their businesses, car, and anything
that can be sold and recover the money borrowed (Garrett, 2009). Hongbo Duan, Xiaojie
and Hongbo (2009) postulated that due to lack of collateral and guarantees the
entrepreneurs in China find it difficult to access loan from financial institutions thus
preventing them from contributing in the economic development of the country. Haron,
Said, Jayaraman, and Ismail (2013) noted in Malaysia collateral affects enterprise access
to finance.
A lot of micro finance institutions are considering to start providing financial services to
low income clients, women entrepreneurs and the self-employed who not able to access
banking and other services. Moreover, the ability to offer credit facilities to customers by
lending institutions was determined by the value of collateral, credit repayment records,
interest rates and the amount of savings customer have (Lumumba, 2016). Abdinor
(2013) investigated the effect of microfinance institution lending on the growth of small
and medium enterprise in Somalia. Descriptive design was used. Probability sampling
and stratified random sampling techniques were used to select a sample of 60 SMEs. It
13
was revealed that only a small percentage of SMEs in Somalia are beneficiaries of the
MFI lending services thus, having an effect on their growth. It was also revealed that
most SME’s do not have collateral thus, end up seeking for finance from cheaper sources.
It was recommended that the government and other financial institutions should ease the
accessibility of credit in small and medium enterprises to the microfinance institutions
and minimize the collateral conditions. SMEs should also be encouraged to use group
financing so as to minimize loan defaulting.
According to a study done by Kimaiyo (2016), on factors limiting small and medium
enterprises access to credit in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Target population was 10,200
SMEs. Descriptive research was used. The study sampled 392 SMEs. It was concluded
that most SMEs did not apply for credit due to complex application procedures, high
interest rate, and insufficient collateral and poor record keeping. Omondi and Jagongo
(2018) suggested that lack of access to credit is a major factor that prevents the growth of
entrepreneurial sector. It limits entrepreneurs from gaining financial services due to lack
of tangible security combined with inappropriate legal and regulatory framework that
does not recognize innovative strategies for lending to entrepreneurs. Adomako-Ansah
and Kwabena (2012) argues that before SME’s access credit form micro financial
institutions they are required to meet certain qualifications such as; collateral security,
financial performance, audited financial statements, credit history, recommendation from
risk managers, business registration documents, entrepreneurial experience and age of
firm.
Due to high collateral requirements, unfavorable interest rates and untimely delivery of
credit are factors that makes SMEs reluctant to obtain loans. Additionally, access to credit
by SME’s has reduced because micro financial institutions have failed to increase SME’s
loans due to lack of information, high transaction costs, large number of borrowers and
low returns from investments (Olutunla & Obamuyi, 2008). Gitonga (2012) in her study
on Microcrediting for low income earners. It was established that entrepreneurs need to
be educated on micro-crediting program and show different business opportunities to
venture into. Additionally, entrepreneurs have suffered lack of access to credit as a result
of not having collateral.
14
2.3.2 Repayment Policy
The amount of debt determines repayment requirements when enterprises are given loans.
In addition, entrepreneurs usually find is a challenge to repay big loans. Efficient loan
size fit borrowers’ repayment capacity and stimulate enterprise. If the amount of loan
given to entrepreneurs is sufficient for the purposes intended, it has a positive impact on
the borrower’s capacity to repay (Chong, 2010). Bragg (2010) postulated that the short
time frame given to entrepreneurs to repay their loans reduces the risk of non-repayment
to the bank, which will make the business’s fortunes will not decline so far within such a
short time period that it cannot repay the loan, while the bank will also be protected from
long-term variations in the interest rate”.
Pius (2010) in her study on influence of microcredit finance on the growth of small scale
women entrepreneurs in Kenya. It was indicated that repayment period affected the cash
flow into the business. Yusuf (2014) examined the effect of microfinance on small scale
enterprise in Osun State, Nigeria. Total population was 120 respondents. Data was
collected from 105 respondents. It was established that business turnover is affected by
loan repayment period, family size, and experience in business were the key determinants
of business turnover. In addition, volume of credit available to SMES’s is affected by the
repayment period and number of sourced.
Base on a study done by Frimpong (2014) on the effect of demand-side factors on access
to external finance by micro, small and medium manufacturing enterprises in Kumasi
Metropolis, Ghana. Target population was 4400 MSMMEs. Some of the challenge that
MSMMEs faces when accessing finance includes size of the firm, educational
background and work experience and financial management practices such as preparation
and use of financial information, business plan and capital budgeting. It is suggested that
SMEs should include good financial management practices such as preparation and usage
of financial information in their operations. It is also important for entrepreneurs to
include business plans in their operations as this will positively affect their access to
external finance. Mathenge (2011) examine the effect of micro finance institutions
services on the financial performance of micro and small enterprises in India Division. It
was revealed that accessibility and repayment of loans affects financial performance of
MSEs positively.
15
Loans given to entrepreneurs by financial institutions usually have short repayment
periods which prevent entrepreneurs from accessing loans (Abereijo & Fayomi, 2005).
Aunga (2017) investigated challenges facing small scale entrepreneurs in accessing loan
from banks at Ngongongare, Meru District, Arusha Region in Tanzania. Total population
was 420 SME’s. 100 respondents were sampled. Questionnaires were used to collect
primary data. It was revealed that transaction costs were found to be high and interest rate
was also found to be high consequently discouraging SME’s from applying for loan.
Moulson (2015) revealed that the payment period is a challenge that entrepreneur’s faces
when accessing loan from financial institutions. At times, loans received are less than
requested and short periods are giving for the repayment of the loan. Abdinor (2013)
investigated the effect of microfinance institution lending on the growth of small and
medium enterprise in Somalia. Descriptive research design was used. Stratified random
sampling was used to select 60 SMEs. The study revealed that challenges causing low
acceptance of loans include; long time taken to process loans, strict repayment terms and
high transaction costs.
2.2.3 Interest Rate
Group lending is the provision of small credit to the poor. It is used by microfinance that
provides loans without collateral. Interest charge is usually lower than interest charged to
individuals who want to access credit (Natarajan, 2004). High lending rates affect
business because they influence both their own direct costs and the ability of their
customers to borrow and spend (Bramuel, 2013). Aunga (2017) stated that loans from
Kenyan microfinance institutions are usually limited in amount, have no grace period, are
short term and have very high interest rates. Additionally, studies have shown that loans
to SMEs only satisfy a fraction of their financial needs.
According to a research done by Abdi and Gikandi (2016), on effects of interest rate on
credit access of small and medium enterprises in Garissa County. Descriptive survey was
employed. Target population was 10 SACCOs and 150 SMEs registered within Garissa
County. It was concluded that SACCO’s interest rate policy affect SMEs accessibility to
credit. It was suggested that SACCO’s should consider revising their policy on interest
rate charged and the county government should intervene to ensure that SMEs have
access to financial services to enable them contribute to development and employment
16
creation. However, a study done by Muthoka (2012) on effect of microfinance on
financial sustainability of small and medium enterprises in Nairobi. The study revealed
that SMEs prefer loans from microfinance institutions, and they seek financial assistance
from the MFIs due to interest rate, easy loan repayment and amount offered.
Based on a study done by Bawuah, Yakubu and Alhassan (2014) on the effects of interest
rate on micro, small and medium enterprises financing decision in Wa Municipality of
Ghana. Multiple research and descriptive survey were used. Data was collected form 200
respondents. Findings revealed that interest rate affects choice of financing decision
SMEs make. Wakaba (2014) examined the effect of microfinance credit on the financial
performance of small and medium enterprises in Kiambu County, Kenya. Survey design
was employed. Total population was 2,061 SMEs. Simple randomly was used to select a
sample of 60 registered SMEs. It was concluded that enterprises benefit from loans from
microfinance institutions, the SMEs seek financial assistance from the MFIs due to
interest rate and easy loan repayment and amount offered.
In his Bett (2013) conducted a study on factors influencing growth of small scale
businesses in Bomet Constituency. It was indicated that SMEs are facing a challenge
accessing credit because of availability of fewer micro financial institutions. Majority of
SME’s are afraid of applying for credit due to high interest rates and lack of information
on availability of more affordable services that are being offered. Aunga (2017)
investigated challenges facing small scale entrepreneurs in accessing loan from banks at
Ngongongare, Meru District, Arusha Region in Tanzania. Total population was 420
SME’s. 100 respondents were sampled. Questionnaires were used to collect primary data.
It was recommended that banks and other financial institutions should lower their interest
rates and also grant loans on business asset and income as collateral securities.
2.4 Capacity Building on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
2.4.1 Education
According to a study done by Frimpong (2014) on the effect of demand-side factors on
access to external finance by micro, small and medium manufacturing enterprises in
Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. Target population was 4400 MSMMEs. Data was collected
from 440 MSMMEs. Explanatory research design was used. It was revealed that
17
education and experience of the entrepreneur has a significantly impact on access to
external finance. It was suggested that short courses should be created to help MSMMEs
practice of financial management especially those with lower educational background as
education is an important factor in accessing external finance. Karajkov (2009) noted that
lack of awareness, education and lack of interest by enterprises constitute the demand-
side factors which contribute to the current situation with regard to access to risk finance.
A survey done by Growth Fin (2008) revealed that inadequate and lack of knowledge on
available options of finance may limit entrepreneur’s access to external finance. Usually,
entrepreneurs are not aware of the kind of money they need and what the alternatives are
to raise capital. Irwin and Scott (2010) in their study on barriers faced by SMEs in raising
bank finance. It was established that educated entrepreneurs have the ability to present
positive financial information and strong business plans and they also have the ability to
maintain a better relationship with financial institutions compared to less educated
entrepreneurs. Fatoki and Smit (2011) found that education and work experience has a
positive effect on loan approval. Kumar and Francisco (2005) in their study they found
education has a strong effect on access to financial services in Brazil.
According to a study done by Owuor (2015), on the effect of microfinance services on the
growth of women owned small and medium enterprises in Ruiru Sub-County. Total
population was 467 women owned SMEs in Ruiru Sub County. Simple random sampling
was used to select a sample of 47 SMEs. Questionnaires were used to collect data. It was
revealed that there was a weak correlation between training and growth of women owned
SMEs in Ruiru sub county and business training services were offered to a very small
extent, SMEs did not attend the training regular and implementation advisory services did
not do a follow up during training and after training. Donkor (2012) argued that one of
the major challenges that entrepreneurs face is lack of financial literacy. This affects
entrepreneur’s ability to access finance from financial institutions. Some entrepreneurs
are not able to understand the terms and conditions required before applying for a loan
and are usually reluctant when repayment period tend to be longer than expected. Some
financial institutions take advantage of their illiteracy and refuse to give them more
information and explain interest rate and its implication on the loan that they are about to
take.
18
Entrepreneurs from rural areas are not able to understand services offered by micro
financial institutions they also lack understanding of loan procedures. Moreover, lack of
information and knowledge makes entrepreneurs have a weak bargaining power in terms
of interest paid, asset and liability disclosure, misuse of loan funds and generally
bad preparedness (Bbenkele, 2007). Olomi, Mori, and Urassa (2008) noted that SME’s
faces a challenge accessing finance due to lack of knowledge of available finance
services, credit history and skills. According to King and McGrath (2012), the growth of
entrepreneurs is greatly affected by education. Entrepreneurs who have large stocks of
human capital in terms of education and vocational training are able to easily adapt to
changes that are taking place in the environment.
2.4.2 Training
According to Shane (2003), entrepreneurial process is a vital source of human capital and
also plays an important role in providing learning opportunity for individuals to improve
their skills, attitudes and ability. However, women entrepreneurs in developing countries,
lack training and. Micro finance service should offer entrepreneurs training because it
will help entrepreneurs gain skills and experience needed for business (Akanji, 2006).
Hassan, Chin, Yeow and Rom (2011) proposed that some microfinance institutions offer
training opportunities to micro-entrepreneurs so that they can understand procedures that
are related to loan application. Kimanzi (2016) studied the influence of micro finance
services on growth of women owned enterprises in Kitui Central Sub-County. Target
population was 230 respondents. Structured questionnaires were used to collect primary
data. It was recommended that leaders in women enterprises should be trained and given
advice on investment opportunities.
According to a study done by Rono (2018), on micro-credit and its relationship to the
growth of small and medium enterprises in Konoin Subcounty, Kenya. Descriptive
research design was used. Target population was 60 retail outlets. Questionnaires were
used to collect data. It was recommended that SMEs should be trained on how to use
financial management systems in their business thus increase efficiency and effectiveness
in tracking financial transactions. Financial institutions should also take part in
mentorship programs where SMEs should be introduced to professional marketers and
business development in order to ensure growth of their enterprises. Zindiye (2008)
19
claims that SME’s are usually unwilling to take part on training programs that requires
them to finance the costs because they are usually not able to learn how to manage case,
develop market and financial strategies. Micro financial instruction should therefore
develop training programs that are free and teach SME’s financial management skills,
book keeping, preparing financial statements, debit/credit control, budgeting and tax
calculation to ensure their growth.
Studies have revealed that lack of training is one of the challenges that entrepreneurs are
facing when accessing microfinance. Entrepreneurs lack training on how to generate
profit from microfinance institution thus, making them fail to manage the loan (Ashe,
Treanor & Mahmood, 2011). Kisaka and Mwewa (2014) investigated effects of Micro-
credit, Micro-savings and training on the growth of small and medium enterprises in
Machakos County in Kenya. A survey research design was used. Data was collected from
100 respondents. Questionnaires were used to collect data. Finding revealed that micro-
credit, micro-savings and training have a positive effect to SMEs growth. However, the
effect of training is not statistically significant because training is not based on the real
needs of SMEs. Nyabwanga (2013) claims that most entrepreneurs have basic education
and over 57% of these business operators do not attend any financial training
programmes. In addition, over 60% of them had little or no knowledge in business
management hence, lacking management skills.
In a study done by Chege (2013) on influence of capacity building on financial
performance and growth of women owned small and medium enterprises in Gikomba
Market. The study concluded that a lot of women owned SME’s have not gone through
training and development. It was suggested that SME’s should be offered training and
development opportunity because it will them increase their financial performance and
growth. Madole (2013) in his study on impact of microfinance credit on the performance
of SMEs in Tanzania: A case study of national microfinance bank- Morogoro. A case
study was used. Simple random and purposive sampling techniques were used to select a
sample of 80 customers. Findings revealed that age or experience of the SME’s owners
and credit accessibility has a positive influence on access to credit and SME’s should be
trained on ways to make investment decision or increase their profits.
20
Some financial institutions offer their clients training opportunities that help
entrepreneurs understand how to keep records and understand their business operations.
Through training, entrepreneurs are able to learn more skills, change their attitude on how
they perceive and conduct business activities and increase their firm performance. A
financially literate entrepreneur is also able to make better decisions on how to use other
financial services, save more and mitigate risk through use of insurance services (Andoh
& Nunoo, (2011).
2.4.3 Networking Skills
Networking is an activity where entrepreneurs build and manage personal relationships
with other businesses and financial institutions in their surrounding (Aarakit &
Kimbugwe, 2015). According to Mano (2014), networking is the creation of formal
relationships where participants share information. Networking is the process of building
long-term relationships with an aim of exchanging information and resources (Lama &
Shrestha, 2011). Chua, Chrisman, Kellermanns and Wu, (2011) contend that a lot of
SME’s are usually too small and do not have resources to make use of networking to
access debt financing. Sungur (2015) argued that if networking is well used it will
increase entrepreneur’s financial performance and market share. It will also help
entrepreneurs identify new opportunities, share knowledge and skills and reduce their
level of uncertainty surrounding the operation of the organization.
According to Ngoc and Nguyen (2009), networking will help entrepreneurs to access
external finance, gain more knowledge and skills and get support they need for
microfinance institutions. Coulthard and Loos (2007) noted that through networking,
entrepreneurs are able to build and manage a personal relationship with organization and
people from different backgrounds. Networking helps SME’s concentrate on its core
business, learn new skills and adapt to technological changes that are taking place in the
environment (Chittithaworn, Islam, Keawchana & Yusuf, 2011). Heshmati (2013) adds
that networking can also help organizations learn suitable business activities and increase
their ability to access finance from microfinance activities.
According to a study done by Tafadzwa and Olawale (2013), on the impact of networking
on access to debt finance and performance of small and medium enterprises in South
Africa. The study revealed that there is a significant and positive relationship between
21
networking and access to debt finance and performance of SMEs. Katambo (2016)
investigated the effect of networking on performance of small and medium sized audit
firms in Nairobi. It was established that performance is influenced by network diversity,
network size and network platform. Gunto and Alias (2014) conducted a research on the
impact of networking on the SMEs’ ability to access financial government support in
Malaysia. It was established that there is a positive and significant relationship between
networking and access to finance.
2.5 Chapter Summary
This chapter has reviewed literature based on the following study research objectives;
challenges, lending policies and demographic factors. The next chapter covered research
design, population and sampling design, data collection methods, research procedures and
the various data analysis methods. This is followed by results and findings in chapter
four, while chapter five provides summary, discussion, conclusion and recommendations.
22
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 RESEARCH METHODLOGY
3.1 Introduction
This chapter deals with steps that should be taken in order to obtain data from the fields.
It discusses method and procedures that were followed to undertake the research. It
covers research design to be used; the population, sampling frame, sampling technique
and sample size; the data collection methods, research procedures and data analysis
methods.
3.2 Research Design
Research design is a framework used to collect and examine data to answer research
questions under study and provide justification for choice of source of data, collection
methods and methods of data analysis (Saunders, Lewis & Thornhill, 2016). The study
used descriptive research design. This study used a descriptive research design.
Descriptive research is appropriate for this study because it helped a researcher gather
information and make summary of present and interpret data for clarification (Orodho,
2003). It helped the researcher collect data that can be described, described, grouped or
summarized in a way that makes sense. The use of descriptive research also helped the
researcher identify attributes of a particular situation based on observation made
(Williams, 2007). The use of descriptive research also helped the researcher describe
characteristics of certain groups, estimate the total number of people who have certain
characteristics and make predictions (Churchill & Iacobucci, 2018).
3.3 Population and Sampling Design
3.3.1 Population
Target population is a complete listing of all the elements under study (Cooper &
Schindler, 2014). Population is individuals, events or objects having a common
observable characteristic (Mugenda & Mugenda, 2003). The target population for this
study was 164 bodaboda operators located in Roysambu, Safari Park, Githurai, Kahawa
and Kahawa West areas.
.
23
Table 3.1: Population Size
Variable Population Percentage (%)
Safari Park 15 9
Githurai 52 32
Kahawa 35 21
Kahawa West 25 15
Roysambu 37 23
Total 164 100
Sorce: Boda Boda Safety Association of Kenya data base, (2019)
3.3.2 Sampling Design
3.3.2.1 Sampling Frame
Sampling frame is a list of all things where sample was drawn (Saunders, Lewis &
Thornhill, 2012). Cooper and Schindler (2012) defines sample frame is a list of all
elements in a population that a researcher was used to draw a sample from. Sample frame
is the selection of certain members of the total population that are to be examined in a
research (Bailey, 2008). The sample frame for this study consisted of 164 bodaboda
operators located in Roysambu and Safari Park areas. This information was obtained from
BodaBoda Safety Association of Kenya data base (2019).
3.3.2.2 Sampling Technique
The study used clustered random sampling. The target population was divided into a
cluster based on geographical location and data was collected for each location. Clustered
random sampling is the process where sample is drawn from elements in a population that
are geographically dispersed and possibly unable to access at the same time (Rahi, 2017).
Clustered random sampling is the process of selecting a sample randomly from each
cluster (Krathwohl, 2009). The use of clustered random sampling helps a researcher
reduce unbiased by ensuring that each element in the population is given an equal chance
of being selected (Bluman, 2007).
3.3.2.3 Sample Size
A sample size is a smaller group or sub-group gotten from the total population (Mugenda
& Mugenda, 1999). Sample size is the collection of a subset of objects, units or things
within a population to gain knowledge about the total population to make predictions
24
based on statistical inference (Thietart, 2001). Guided by the rule of thumb, the study
used clustered random sampling and a quota of 30% which was drawn from each strata.
Table 3.2: Sample Size
Variable Population Sampling ratio Sampling Size
Safari Park 15 0.3 5
Githurai 52 0.3 16
Kahawa 35 0.3 11
Kahawa West 25 0.3 6
Roysambu 37 0.3 11
Total 164 100 48
3.4 Data Collection Methods
Data collection is the process of gathering and assessing information based on sample
under study in a systematic way. It helps a researcher answer relevant questions and
evaluate outcomes (Cooper & Schindler, 2008). The study used primary data because
they are accurate, researcher was able to get up-to-date information and it is usually
unbiased. Primary data is raw data that has been collected directly from the field it can
also be qualitative or quantitative in nature. According to Struwig and Stead (2001),
qualitative data are information expressed in the form of “words, pictures, drawings,
paintings, photographs, films, videotapes, music and sound tracks” and are also expressed
in numbers. In addition, primary data was collected using closed ended questionnaires.
Closed ended questionnaires will be used to collect data because they are easy to analyze,
able to compare answers from different respondents and clarify any questions that
respondents might have. According to Kothari (2004), questionnaire is one of the most
common data collection tools used in research. Questionnaires are used to gather data on
current conditions, practices, opinions and attitudes in a quick and precise way (Orodho,
2008). In addition, use of questionnaires is usually cheap and less time consuming.
The questionnaire had a five point likert scale where; 5= strongly agree, 4=agree,
3=neutral, 2=disagree and 1= strongly disagree. The questionnaire was divided into five
sections. Section one has demographic information. Section two contained questions on
factors affecting access to finance. Section three has questions on lending policies.
25
Section four has questions on capacity building and section five has questions on
financial performance.
3.5 Research Procedure
A pilot study was done to identify any weakness in the research design (Cooper and
Schindler, 2013). Therefore, ten questionnaires were used to conduct a pilot study.
According to Mugenda and Magenda (2003), a pilot study with a sample of a tenth
of the total sample with homogenous characteristics is appropriate for the pilot
study. Information collected after the pilot study was used to polish and modify the
questionnaire thus, determine reliability. Pilot testing is an important step in research
process because it reveals vague questions and unclear instructions in the instruments. It
also captures important comments and suggestions from the respondents that enable the
researcher to improve on the efficiency of research instrument. To be able to collect data,
NACOSTI and a letter from United States International University obtained from the
university to help the research collect data. Questionnaires were self-administered.
Through this, a researcher was able to develop a relationship with the respondents,
answer questions that respondents might have and ensure that questionnaires are returned.
Gall, Gall, & Borg (2007) argued “that a self-administered questionnaire is the only way
to prompt self-report on peoples’ opinion, attitudes, beliefs and values. Due to
researcher’s lack of time to collect data a researcher was hired to collect and respondents
were assured that information collected was treated confidential and was only be used for
academic research.
3.6 Data Analysis Methods
Mugenda and Mugenda (2003) stated that data analysis is the process of bringing order,
structure and meaning to the information collected. Descriptive research was used. Data
collected was coded and analyzed based on variables under study. Statistical Package for
Social Sciences (SPSS) software was used to analyze the data. Pearson correlation and
regression analysis was used to determine the influence of independent variables on the
dependent variable. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, mean, standard deviation,
correlation, ANOVA and regression analysis were used to present data.
3.6 Chapter Summary
This chapter explains research methodologies that were used. In addition, a pilot study
was also done to determine the reliability of the questionnaire and primary data was
26
collected using questionnaire and a Pearson correlation was also done to determine
reliability of variables under study. Chapter four covers results and findings, while
chapter five provides summary, discussion, conclusion and recommendations.
.
27
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULTS AND FINDINGS
4.1 Introduction
This chapter covers results and findings of the study. It has presented results on
demographic factors, factors affecting access to finance, lending policy and capacity
building. Results on the study variables were presented using descriptive statistics.
4.2 General Information
4.2.1 Response Rate
The study issued 48 questionnaires but only 43 were filled and collected and 5
questionnaires were not answered. This gives a response rate of 90% as shown in Table
4.1.
Table 4.1: Response Rate
Questionnaires Number Percentage
Filled and collected 43 90
Non Responded 5 10
Total 48 100
4.2.2 Respondents’ Background
This section presents results on demographic factors of the respondents who participated
in the study.
4.2.2.1 Age of Respondents
To examine age of the respondent’s it was established that 40% of the respondents were
between age group 25-30 years. It was also revealed that 37% of the respondents were
between age group 31-39 and 23% were 40 years and above. Results are shown in Figure
4.1.
28
Figure 4.1: Age of Respondents
4.2.2.2 Gender of Respondents
To study gender of the respondent’s results revealed that 79% of the respondents were
male and 21% of the respondents were female. Results are shown in Figure 4.2.
Figure 4.2: Gender of Respondents
4.2.2.3 Marital Status
To investigate marital status results showed that 30 of the respondents are marred this
accounts for 70% of the total population, 6 responded were divorced accounting for 14%
of the respondents, 4 respondents were single accounting for 9% of the total population
and 3 respondents were widowed accounting for 7% of the total population. Results are
shown in Figure 4.3.
29
Figure 4.3: Marital Status
4.2.2.4 Highest Level of Education
Respondents were asked to state their highest level of education and 15 respondents
stated that they have secondary education this represents 35% population, 13 respondents
stated that they have a certificate this represents 30% the population, 8 respondents have
diploma this represents 19% of the population, 6 respondents have primary education this
represents 14% of the population and 1 respondent have a degree this represents 2% of
the population. As shown in Figure 4.4.
Figure 4.4: Highest Level of Education
4.2.2.5 Years of Business Operation
The results in Figure 4.5 show that 19 respondents stated that they have had the business
for 3-5 years representing 44% of the population, 13 respondents revealed that the
business has been operating for 6-8 years this represents 30% of the population, 6
respondents answered they have running the business for 0-2 years this represents 14% of
30
the population and 5 respondents noted that they have been running the business for more
than 9 years this represents 12% of the population..
Figure 4.5: Years of Business Operation
4.2.2.6 Finances Accessed
To investigate finances respondents have accessed, results revealed that 35% of
respondents have gotten loan from Sacco, 23% from personal savings, 16% have gotten
loan from family, 14% from more two sources, and 5% have gotten loan from friends. As
shown in Figure 4.6.
Figure 4.6 Finances you have accessed
4.3 Factors Affecting Access to Finance
The first objective sought to examine factors affecting access to finance and its effect on
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs in Roysambu and Safari Park. Five point Likert
Scale was used. Respondents were supposed to answer the questions where; 5= Strongly
31
Agree 2- Agree, 3= Neutral, 4 =Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree. In the sub-section, both
descriptive and inferential statistics are provided with regard to access to finance.
4.3.1 Descriptive Statistics of Factors Affecting Access to Finance
It was determined that majority of respondents agreed that they started they started their
business using their savings had the highest mean of 3.48 and standard deviation of 1.110
and respondents usually disclose information regarding their business when applying for
a loan had a mean of 3.47 and standard deviation of 1.202. However respondents could
not reach an agreement on due to lack of enough cash flow from their business
respondents prefer taking loan from friends and family had a mean of 3.44 and standard
deviation of 1.297. Respondents started their business using money from family had a
mean of 3.33 and standard deviation of 1.366. Business savings has helped respondent’s
access loan easily from financial institutions had a mean of 3.24 and standard deviation of
.932 and respondents experience a challenge accessing finance from microfinance
institutions had a mean of 3.05 and standard deviation of 1.463. Respondents also
disagreed on they keep good business records that help them access finance easily from
micro financial institutions had a mean of 2.91 and standard deviation of 1.087 and they
maintain proper financial record had a mean of 2.63 and standard deviation of 1.381.
Results are shown in Table 4.2.
32
Table 4.2: Descriptive Statistics of Factors Affecting Access to Finance
VARIABLE MEAN SD
I experience a challenge accessing finance from microfinance
institutions 3.05 1.463
I keep good business records that help me access finance easily
from micro financial institutions.
2.91 1.087
Due to lack of enough cash flow from my business I prefer
taking loan from my friends and family 3.44 1.297
I started my business using my savings 3.48 1.110
I started my business using money from my family. 3.33 1.366
My business savings has helped me access loan easily from
financial institutions 3.24 .932
I usually disclose information regarding my business when
applying for a loan. 3.47 1.202
I maintain proper financial record 2.63 1.381
Aggregate Value 3.19 1.229
4.3.2 Statistical Tests
The study was set to analyze the effect of microfinance institutions on performance of
entrepreneurship in Kenya. A regression analysis was done to determine if factors
affecting access to finance influences performance of entrepreneurs.
4.3.2.1 Correlation between Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurs
The study did a correlation analysis to determine the relationship between factors
affecting access to finance and performance of entrepreneurship. It was revealed that
there was a positive and insignificant relationship between affecting access to finance and
performance of entrepreneurship (r=0.26, p<0.092). This shows that with every
improvement on factors affecting access to finance there is no increase in performance.
33
Table 4.1: Correlation between Factors Affecting Access to Finance and
Performance of Entrepreneurs
Correlations
Performance Factors Affecting Access to
Finance
Performance Pearson
Correlation
1 0.26
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.092
Factors Affecting
Access to
Finance
Pearson
Correlation
0.26 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.092
4.3.2.2 Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance
of Entrepreneurs
The results revealed that the R2 was 0.068 which indicates that 6.8% of performance of
entrepreneurship is determined by factors affecting as shown in Table 4.4
Table 4.2: Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and
Performance of Entrepreneurs
Model Summary
Model R R
Square
Adjusted
R
Square
Std.
Error of
the
Estimate
Change Statistics
R
Square
Change
F
Change
df1 df2 Sig. F
Change
1 .260a 0.068 0.045 0.74917 0.068 2.983 1 41 0.092
a. a. Predictors: (Constant), factors affecting access to finance
4.3.2.3 ANOVA
An ANOVA analysis was done between factors affecting access to finance and
performance of entrepreneurship and at 95% confidence level, the F value=2.983,
P<0.092). This shows that factors affecting access to finance has an insignificant effect on
performance as shown in Table 4.5.
34
Table 4.3: Anova of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurs
ANOVAa
Model Sum of
Squares
df Mean
Square
F Sig.
1 Regression 1.674 1 1.674 2.983 .092b
Residual 23.012 41 0.561
Total 24.686 42
a. Dependent Variable: Performance
b. Predictors: (Constant), factors affecting access to finance
4.3.2.4 Coefficients of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurs
The findings in Table 4.6 indicates that factors affecting access to finance has a positive
but insignificant effect on performances (β= 0.260, p>0.092).
Table 4.4: Coefficients of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurs
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std.
Error
Beta
1 Performance 2.157 .783 2.755 .009
Factors Affecting Access
to Finance
.421 .243 .260 1.727 .092
4.4 Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs
The first objective sought to find out how lending policies of micro financial institution
affects performance. Five point Likert Scale was used. Respondents were supposed to
answer the questions where; 5= Strongly Agree 2- Agree, 3= Neutral, 4 =Disagree, 1=
Strongly Disagree. In the sub-section, both descriptive and inferential statistics are
provided with regard to lending policy.
35
4.4.1 Descriptive Statistics of Lending Policy
The study established that respondents agreed that due to lack of collateral respondents
get loans from other sources had a mean of 3.63 and standard deviation of 1.092 and
respondents consider the amount of interest rates charged before seeking finance had a
mean of 3.51 and standard deviation of .985. However, respondents could not reach an
agreement on micro financial intuitions transaction costs are usually higher thus, making
respondents not apply for loans had a mean of 3.47 and standard deviation of .767. Use of
group financing has helped respondents pay their loan easily had a mean of 3.44 and
standard deviation of 1.119. Respondents are usually discouraged from applying for a
loan because they usually give them less money than what they requested had a mean of
3.44 and standard deviation of 1.031.
Findings also revealed that respondents face challenges accessing finance due to high
interest rate had a mean of 3.26 and standard deviation of 1.136. Micro financial
institutions charge high penalties on credit default had a mean of 3.26 and standard
deviation 1.217. Respondents do not like to apply for loans due to complex application
procedures had a mean of 3.23 and a standard deviation of 1.109. Respondents are able to
easily repay their loan had a mean of 3.12 and standard deviation of 1.159. Businesses
that are registered are able to access loan easily had a mean of 3.09 and standard
deviation of 1.109. Respondents do not take loans due to short loan repayment had a
mean of 3.09 and standard deviation of 1.109 and respondents have enough assets to use
as security when accessing loan from financial institutions had a mean of 3.05 and
standard deviation of 1.344. As shown in Table 4.7.
36
Table 4.5: Descriptive Statistics of Lending Policy
VARIABLE MEAN SD
I have enough assets to use as security when accessing loan from
financial institutions. 3.05 1.344
I am able to easily repay my loan 3.12 1.159
Due to lack of collateral I get loans from other sources 3.63 1.092
The use of group financing has helped me pay my loan easily 3.44 1.119
I do not like to apply for loans due to complex application
procedures
3.23 1.109
Businesses that are registered are able to access loan easily 3.09 1.109
I consider the amount of interest rates charged before seeking
finance
3.51 .985
I do not take loans due to short loan repayment 3.09 1.109
Micro financial intuitions transaction costs are usually higher
thus, making me not apply for loans
3.47 .767
I am usually discouraged to apply for a loan because they
usually give me less money than what I requested
3.44 1.031
I face challenges accessing finance due to high interest rate 3.26 1.136
Micro financial institutions charges high penalties on credit
default
3.26 1.217
Aggregate Value 3.29 1.098
4.4.2 Statistical Tests
The study was set to analyze the effect of microfinance institutions on performance of
entrepreneurship in Kenya. A regression analysis was done to determine if lending policy
influences performance of entrepreneurs
4.4.2.1 Correlation between Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurship
The study did a correlation analysis to determine the relationship lending policy and
performance of entrepreneurship. It was revealed that there was a positive and significant
relationship between lending policy and performance of entrepreneurship (r=.388*,
p<0.010). This shows that with every improvement on lending policy there is an increase
in performance.
37
Table 4.6: Correlation between Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs
Correlations
Performance Lending Policy
Performance Pearson
Correlation
1 .388*
Sig. (2-tailed) .010
Lending Policy Pearson
Correlation
.388* 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .010
4.4.2.2 Regression Analysis of Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs
The findings showed that the R2 was 0.151 which indicates that 15% of performance of
entrepreneurship is determined by lending policy as shown in Table 4.9.
Table 4.7: Regression Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs
Model Summary
Model R R
Square
Adjusted
R
Square
Std.
Error of
the
Estimate
Change Statistics
R
Square
Change
F
Change
df1 df2 Sig. F
Change
1 .388a 0.151 0.13 0.71516 0.151 7.267 1 41 0.01
a. a. Predictors: (Constant), lending police
4.4.2.3 ANOVA
An ANOVA analysis was done between lending police and performance of
entrepreneurship and at 95% confidence level, the F value=7.267, P<0.010). This shows
that lending police has a significant effect on performance as shown in Table 4.10.
38
Table 4.8: Anova of Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs
ANOVAa
Model Sum of
Squares
df Mean
Square
F Sig.
1 Regression 3.717 1 3.717 7.267 .010b
Residual 20.969 41 .511
Total 24.686 42
a. Dependent Variable: performance of entrepreneurship
b. Predictors: (Constant), lending police
4.3.3.4 Coefficients of Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs
The findings in Table 4.11 indicates that lending has a positive and significant effect on
performances (β= 0.388, p<0.010).
Table 4.9: Coefficients of Lending Policy and Performance of Entrepreneurs
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1 Performance 1.455 .764 1.904 .064
Lending Policy .618 .229 .388 2.696 .010
4.5 Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurs
The third objective sought to determine the effect of capacity building of micro financial
institution affects performance. Five point Likert Scale was used. Respondents were
supposed to answer the questions where; 5= Strongly Agree 2- Agree, 3= Neutral, 4
=Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree. A regression analysis was done to determine if capacity
building influences performance of entrepreneurs
4.5.1 Descriptive Statistics of Capacity Building
The study revealed that respondent agreed that training they attended helped them grow
their business had a mean of 3.70 and standard deviation 1.166. Business training has a
positive effect to the sales growth trend in respondents business had a mean of 3.70 and
39
standard deviation .887. Through networking respondents were able to share knowledge
and learn new skills had a mean of 3.65 and standard deviation .923 and respondents are
able to understand terms and conditions required before applying for a loan had a mean of
3.65 and standard deviation of 1.152.
Findings also revealed that majority of respondents were not sure on they require more
business training to access loans had a mean of 3.37 standard deviation of 1.176. Appling
for a loan as a group is easy because respondents can get co guarantors had a mean of
3.35 and standard deviation of 1.361. Respondents have attended a training offered by
microfinance institutions to help me understand procedures that are related to loan
application had a mean of 3.26 and standard deviation of 1.026 and keeping the right
network has enabled respondents get access to loans had a mean of 3.23 and standard
deviation of 1.288. The study also showed that respondent disagreed on they have a
business plan that they can use when applying for money from microfinance institutions
had a mean of 2.98 and standard deviation of 1.165.
40
Table 4.10: Descriptive Statistics of Capacity Building
VARIABLE MEAN SD
I am aware of loans offered by micro financial institutions 3.60 1.003
I require more business training to access loans 3.37 1.176
I have a business plan that I can use when applying for money
from microfinance institutions 2.98 1.165
Business training has a positive effect to the sales growth trend
in my business 3.70 .887
I am able to understand terms and conditions required before
applying for a loan 3.65 1.152
Through training I was able to gain skills and experience needed
to run my business
3.56 1.098
I have attended a training offered by microfinance institutions to
help me understand procedures related to loan application 3.26 1.026
The training I attended helped me grow my business 3.70 1.166
Keeping the right network has enabled me get access to loans 3.23 1.288
Through networking I was able to share knowledge and learn
new skills 3.65 .923
Appling for a loan as a group is easy because I can get co-
guarantors 3.35 1.361
Aggregate Values 3.45 1.113
4.5.2 Statistical Tests
The study was set to analyze the effect of microfinance institutions on performance of
entrepreneurship in Kenya. A regression analysis was done to determine capacity building
influences performance of entrepreneurs.
4.5.2.1 Correlation between Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurs
The study did a correlation analysis to determine the relationship between capacity
building and performance of entrepreneurship. It was revealed that there was a positive
and significant relationship between capacity building and performance of
entrepreneurship (r=.605***, p<0.000). This shows that with every improvement on
capacity building there is an increase in performance.
41
Table 4.11: Correlation between Capacity Building and Performance of
Entrepreneurs
Correlations
Performance Capacity Building
Performance Pearson
Correlation
1 .605**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
Capacity
building
Pearson
Correlation
.605** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
4.5.2.2 Regression Analysis of Capacity Building and Performance of
Entrepreneurship
The results revealed that the R2 was 0.366 which indicates that 36% of performance of
entrepreneurship is determined by capacity building as shown in Table 4.14.
Table 4.12: Regression Analysis of Capacity Building and Performance of
Entrepreneurs
Model Summary
Model R R
Square
Adjusted
R
Square
Std.
Error of
the
Estimate
Change Statistics
R
Square
Change
F
Change
df1 df2 Sig. F
Change
1 .605a 0.366 0.351 0.61773 0.366 23.693 1 41 .000
a. a. Predictors: (Constant), capacity building
4.5.2.3 ANOVA
An ANOVA analysis was done between capacity building and performance of
entrepreneurship and at 95% confidence level, the F value= 23.693, P<0.010). This shows
that capacity building has a significant effect on performance as shown in Table 4.15.
42
Table 4.13: Anova of Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurship
ANOVAa
Model Sum of
Squares
df Mean
Square
F Sig.
1 Regression 9.041 1 9.041 23.693 .000b
Residual 15.645 41 .382
Total 24.686 42
a. Dependent Variable: performance of entrepreneurship
b. Predictors: (Constant), capacity building
4.5.3.2 Coefficients of Capacity Building and Performance of Entrepreneurship
The findings in Table 4.16 shows capacity building has a positive significant effect on
performances (β= 0.605, p<0.000).
Table 4.14: Coefficients of Factors Affecting Access to Finance and Performance of
Entrepreneurship
Model Unstandardized
Coefficients
Standardiz
ed
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std.
Error
Beta
1 Performance .726 .576 1.260 .215
Capacity building .800 .164 .605 4.868 .000
4.6 Financial Performance
The study sought to determine the effect of financial performance. Five point Likert Scale
was used. Respondents were supposed to answer the questions where; 5= Strongly Agree
2- Agree, 3= Neutral, 4 =Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree.
4.6.1 Descriptive Statistics of Financial Performance
The study showed that majority of respondent agreed that access to finance has helped
respondents grow their business had a mean of 3.65 and standard deviation of 1.066 and
respondents are able to achieve targets that they set for each task had a mean of 3.63 and
43
standard deviation of 1.113. However, respondents disagreed on through training,
financial performance has increased had a mean of 3.42 and standard deviation of 1.006
and savings has contributed to respondents financial performance had a mean of 3.28 and
standard deviation of 1.141.
Table 4.15: Descriptive Statistics of Financial Performance
VARIABLE MEAN SD
Access to finance has helped me grow my business 3.65 1.066
Through training, my financial performance has increased 3.42 1.006
Savings has contributed to my financial performance 3.28 1.141
I am able to achieve targets that I set for each task 3.63 1.113
Aggregate Values 3.49 1.081
4.7 Chapter Summary
Chapter four has discussed findings based on the analysis that was done from primary
data that was collected. It covered results on demography and discusses results on each
objectives using descriptive statistics. It also presents correlation and regression analysis
for each objectives. Chapter five provides summary, discussion, conclusion and
recommendations.
44
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 SUMMARY, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
This chapter discusses summary of the findings, conclusion and recommendation of the
study. It also covers summary and gives conclusion based on research objectives. It then
discusses recommendation based on the conclusion and gives recommendation for further
studies.
5.2 Summary
The general objective of this study was to determine the effect of microfinance banks on
the development of entrepreneurship in Kenya, the case of bodaboda business in Nairobi.
The study was guided by the following research objectives: to examine factors affecting
access to finance on performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs in Roysambu and Safari
Park Area; to find out how lending policies of micro financial institution affects
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs in Roysambu and Safari Park Area; and to
determine the effect of capacity building of micro financial institution affects
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs in Roysambu and Safari Park Area.
A descriptive research design was used because it helps the researcher find out the what,
who, where, when or how much. Target population used was 164 bodaboda operators in
Royambu and Safari Park. Clustered random sampling was used and a quota of 30%
which was drawn from each strata thus, giving us a sample size of 48 respondents.
Questionnaires were used to collect data. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Pearson correlation and regression analysis was used to determine the influence of
independent variables on the dependent variable.
The findings on factors affecting access to finance and its effect on performance of
Bodaboda entrepreneurs revealed that majority of respondents agreed that they started
their business using their savings and respondents usually disclose information regarding
their business when applying for a loan. Respondents could not however reach an
agreement on due to lack of enough cash flow from their business they prefer taking loan
from friends and family. Respondents started their business using money from family.
45
Business savings has helped respondent’s access loan easily from financial institutions
and respondents experience a challenge accessing finance from microfinance institutions.
Respondents also disagreed on they keep good business records that help them access
finance easily from micro financial institutions and they maintain proper financial record.
A regression analysis was done and It was revealed that there was a positive and
insignificant relationship between affecting access to finance and performance of
entrepreneurship (r=0.26, p<0.092).
The findings on how lending policies of micro financial institution affects performance of
Bodaboda entrepreneurs. Showed that respondents agreed that due to lack of collateral
respondents get loans from other sources. Respondents consider the amount of interest
rates charged before seeking finance. However, respondents could not reach an agreement
on micro financial intuitions transaction costs are usually higher thus, making respondents
not apply for loans; use of group financing has helped respondents pay their loan easily.
Respondents are usually discouraged to apply for a loan because they usually give them
less money than what they requested. Findings also revealed that respondents face
challenges accessing finance due to high interest rate. Micro financial institutions charges
high penalties on credit default. Respondents do not like to apply for loans due to
complex application procedures. Respondents are able to easily repay their loan.
Businesses that are registered are able to access loan easily. Respondents do not take
loans due to short loan repayment and respondents have enough assets to use as security
when accessing loan from financial institutions. A regression analysis was done and It
was revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between lending policy
and performance of entrepreneurship (r=.388*, p<0.010).
The findings on effect of capacity building of micro financial institution affects
performance of Bodaboda entrepreneurs respondent agreed that training they attended
helped them grow their business. Business training has a positive effect to sales growth.
Through networking respondents were able to share knowledge and learn new skills and
respondents are able to understand terms and conditions required before applying for a
loan. Findings also revealed that majority of respondents were not sure on they require
more business training to access loans had. Appling for a loan as a group is easy because
46
respondents can get co guarantors. Respondents have attended a training offered by
microfinance institutions to help them understand procedures that are related to loan
application and keeping the right network has enabled respondents get access to. The
study also showed that respondent disagreed on they have a business plan that they can
use when applying for money from microfinance institutions. A regression analysis was
done and it was revealed that there was a positive and significant relationship between
capacity building and performance of entrepreneurship (r=.605***, p<0.000).
5.3 Discussion
5.3.1 Access to Finance and Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
The findings established that respondents started their business using their savings. This
is in line with a study done by Gichuki (2012) who stated that self-employed businesses
had the highest form of informal financing, 37% use personal credit cards, 36% use their
own personal savings while 34% used commercial loans. This implies that small
businesses depend on informal financing such as business owner’s savings and personal
credit facilities.
The study revealed that respondents usually disclose information regarding their business
when applying for a loan. Schayek (2011) claims that most SME’s owners/managers are
very sensitive about disclosing information relating to their firm’s financial performance.
According to Mazanai and Fatoki (2012), start-up SMEs are usually affected by
information asymmetry problems because information is usually inadequate and not
transparent. New SMEs are also unwilling to provide full information about their business
therefore, limiting them from accessing finance from financial institutions.
Entrepreneurs are more likely to be affected by information asymmetry problems.
Moreover, information asymmetries are common in new and technology-based
propositions. It occurs when manufacturing or technology based firms, are reluctant to
provide full information because they fear that that disclosure may make it easier for their
competitors to exploit (Deakinset et al, 2008).
47
The findings revealed that due to lack of enough cash flow from their business they prefer
taking loan from friends and family and respondents started their business using money
from family. Mazanai and Fatoki (2012) revealed that that due to lack of enough cash
flow from their business they prefer taking loan from friends and family and respondents
started their business using money from family. Macharia (2012), The study found that
in financing of the micro and small business, family and friends played a big role
in helping business owners to boost their operations with an average of 40% of the
finances coming from them, an average of 24% came from microfinance institutions
while on average 30% of the finances were from business savings.
Oliveira and Fortunato (2006) found that small firms face financial limitation which
affects their growth and development in the long run. Moreover, small firms are also not
able to make use of economies of scale as compared to large firms. This is because small
firms do not have sufficient cash flow and are not able to depend on bank financing but
depends on their own equity investment.
It was indicated that business savings has helped respondent’s access loan easily from
financial institutions. According to Onyango (2010), most firms usually start as family
owned business and use their savings and family finance. The business then grows and
they start seeking for funds from other microfinance institutions. With time it becomes
well established and starts keeping good business records, developed accounting systems,
establish a legal identity and start seeking finance form financial institutions Bello (2013)
argued that increasing access to saving is important because it helps the people who come
from poor areas that have not qualified for Microfinance services, to save with
microfinance institutions thus, be able to access micro-credit and alleviate poverty.
The findings revealed that respondents experience a challenge accessing finance from
microfinance institutions. Canton et al (2013) noted that entrepreneurs are facing a
challenge to access finance from financial institutions due to lack of sufficient
information that is needed and transparency hence, hindering their growth and
development. Pierluigi and Valentina (2017) revealed that family owned firms are more
likely to experience difficulty accessing credit from financial institutions. Gichure (2016)
in his study it was revealed that the SMEs faced challenges in accessing finance due to
information asymmetry
48
According to Fatoki and Odeyemi (2010), studies have shown that demographic factors
such as; size, ownership type, age and sector influence the access to finance. Small firms
have more credit limitations as compared to large firms. Small firms are owned and
operated by private individuals who have no legal obligation to report financial
performance or to regularly audit their financial accounts. Small firms also have fewer
assets to provide as collateral and they are also linked with high failure rates as compared
to large firms Pandula (2011).
The findings showed that respondents dose not maintain proper financial record Kakuru
(2013) stated that small firms are not able to provide financial information, because it is
owned and operated by the owner, they have fewer assets and they lack legal requirement
to regularly report financial information and also lack audited financial accounts. Joseph
(2013) noted that financial characteristics such as business registration, accurate
documentation of transaction and financial activities as well as good business planning
have a positive correlation with credit accessibility. A study done by Aunga (2017)
revealed that lack of adequate accounting information is one of the challenges that small
scale entrepreneurs are facing while accessing loans from financial institutions.
It was established that respondents disagreed on they keep good business records that
help them access finance easily from micro financial institutions. Beck et al (2013)
postulated that financial structure, size and access to finance it was revealed that
information asymmetry is caused by poor accounting records, lack of audited financial
statements and inadequate access to SMEs information from credit bureaus. Nanyondo et
al (2014) in their study it was established that there was a significant and positive
relationship between quality of financial statements and access to finance and a
significant and negative relationship between information asymmetry and access to
finance.
5.3.2 Lending Policy on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
It was determined that due to lack of collateral respondents get loans from other sources.
This is in line with a study done by Abdinor (2013) which revealed that most SME’s do
not have collateral thus, end up seeking for finance from cheaper sources. It was
49
recommended that the government and other financial institutions should ease the
accessibility of credit in small and medium enterprises to the microfinance institutions
and minimize the collateral conditions. SMEs should also be encouraged to use group
financing so as to minimize loan defaulting. Hongbo et al, (2009) postulated that due to
lack of collateral and guarantees the entrepreneurs in China find it difficult to access loan
from financial institutions thus preventing them from contributing in the economic
development of the country.
The study found that respondents consider the amount of interest rates charged before
seeking finance. Muthoka (2012) postulated that SMEs benefit from loans from
microfinance institutions, and they seek financial assistance from the MFIs due to interest
rate, easy loan repayment and amount offered. Abdi and Gikandi (2016) in their study it
was concluded that SACCO’s interest rate policy affect SMEs accessibility to credit. It
was suggested that SACCO’s should consider revising their policy on interest rate
charged and the county government should intervene to ensure that SMEs have access to
financial services to enable them contribute to development and employment creation.
The study has determined that micro financial intuitions transaction costs are usually
higher thus, making respondents not apply for loans. Smaller and younger entrepreneurs
usually encounter higher cost of financing and are also required to produce collateral
however; smaller entrepreneurs have fewer assets to offer as collateral (Berger & Udell
(2002). Access to credit by SME’s has reduced because micro financial institutions have
failed to increase SME’s loans due to lack of information, high transaction costs, large
number of borrowers and low returns from investments (Olutunla & Obamuyi, 2008).
The findings revealed that respondents disagreed on respondents are usually discouraged
to apply for a loan because they usually give them less money than what they requested.
Cassar (2004) indicated that it is costly for smaller firms to resolve information
asymmetries with debt providers. Therefore, small firms will be offered less debt capital
as compared to larger firms. Transaction cost may also be higher. In addition, smaller
firms are also not able to raise capital because capital markets they are not able to reach
capital markets due to their size.
It was indicated that respondents face challenges accessing finance due to high interest
rate. According to a study done by Kimaiyo (2016), it was concluded that most SMEs did
50
not apply for credit due to complex application procedures, high interest rate, and
insufficient collateral and poor record keeping. A lot of micro finance institutions are
considering to start providing financial services to low income clients, women
entrepreneurs and the self-employed who not able to access banking and other services.
Moreover, the ability to offer credit facilities to customers by lending institutions was
determined by the value of collateral, credit repayment records, interest rates and the
amount of savings customer have (Lumumba, 2016). Bett (2016) stated that majority of
SME’s are afraid of applying for credit due to high interest rates and lack of information
on availability of more affordable services that are being offered.
The findings showed that respondents do not take loans due to short loan repayment.
Bragg (2010) postulated that the short time frame given to entrepreneurs to repay their
loans reduces the risk of non-repayment to the bank, which will make the business’s
fortunes not decline so far within such a short time period that it cannot repay the loan,
while the bank will also be protected from long-term variations in the interest rate”. Pius
(2010) in her study on influence of microcredit finance on the growth of small scale
women entrepreneurs in Kenya. It was indicated that repayment period affected the cash
flow into the business
It was determined that respondents do not have enough assets to use as security when
accessing loan from financial institutions. Omondi and Jagongo (2018) suggested that
lack of access to credit is a major factor that prevents the growth of entrepreneurial sector.
It limits entrepreneurs from gaining financial services due to lack of tangible security
combined with inappropriate legal and regulatory framework that does not recognize
innovative strategies for lending to entrepreneurs.
5.3.3 Capacity Building Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
The finding revealed that respondent agreed that training they attended helped them grow
their business. This is in contrast to a study done by Owuor (2015) it was revealed that
there weak correlation between training and growth of women owned SMEs in Ruiru Sub
County and business training services were offered to a very small extent, attendance was
not regular and there was no follow up on implementation advisory services offered
during such training. A study done by Kisaka and Mwewa (2014) revealed that that
51
micro-credit, micro-savings and training jointly contribute positively to SMEs growth.
According to King and McGrath (2012), the growth of entrepreneurs is greatly affected
by education. Entrepreneurs who have large stocks of human capital in terms of education
and vocational training are able to easily adapt to changes that are taking place in the
environment.
The study showed that respondents are able to understand terms and conditions required
before applying for a loan. Donkor (2012) argued that one of the major challenges that
entrepreneurs face is lack of financial literacy. This affects entrepreneur’s ability to
access finance from financial institutions. Some entrepreneurs are not able to understand
the terms and conditions required before applying for a loan and are usually reluctant
when repayment period tend to be longer than expected. Some financial institutions take
advantage of their illiteracy and refuse to give them more information and explain interest
rate and its implication on the loan that they are about to take.
It was indicated that through networking respondents were able to share knowledge and
learn new skills. Sungur (2015) argued that if networking is well used it will increase
entrepreneur’s financial performance and market share. It will also help entrepreneurs
identify new opportunities, share knowledge and skills and reduce their level of
uncertainty surrounding the operation of the organization. Networking is the process of
building long-term relationships with an aim of exchanging information and resources
(Lama & Shrestha, 2011). According to Mano (2014) networking is creation of formal
relationships where participants share information. According to Ngoc and Nguyen
(2009), networking will help entrepreneurs to access external finance, gain more
knowledge and skills and get support they need for microfinance institutions.
Respondents could not reach an agreement on they have attended training offered by
microfinance institutions to help them understand procedures that are related to loan
application. Entrepreneurs from rural areas are not able to understand services offered by
micro financial institutions they also lack understanding of loan procedures. Moreover,
lack of information and knowledge makes entrepreneurs have a weak bargaining power in
terms of interest paid, asset and liability disclosure, misuse of loan funds and generally
bad preparedness (Bbenkele, 2007).
52
Findings also revealed that majority of respondents could not reach an agreement on they
require more business training to access loans. Kimanzi (2016) in his study it was
recommended that leaders in the women enterprises should be trained and given advice
on investment opportunities. Studies have revealed that lack of training is one of the
challenges that entrepreneurs are facing when accessing microfinance. Entrepreneurs lack
training on how to generate profit from microfinance institution thus, making them fail to
manage the loan (Ashe et al, 2011). Rono (2018) stated that financial institutions should
also take part in mentorship programs where SMEs should be introduced to professional
marketers and business development in order to ensure growth of their enterprises
It was revealed that respondents could not reach an agreement on keeping the right
network has enabled respondents get access to loans. According to Ngoc and Nguyen
(2009), networking will help entrepreneurs to access external finance, gain more
knowledge and skills and get support they need for microfinance institutions. Heshmati
(2013) adds that networking can also help organizations learn suitable business activities
and increase their ability to access finance from microfinance activities. As study done by
Tafadzwa and Olawale (2013) study revealed that there is a significant and positive
relationship between networking and access to debt finance and performance of SMEs.
According to Ngoc and Nguyen (2009), networking will help entrepreneurs to access
external finance, gain more knowledge and skills and get support they need for
microfinance institutions. Gunto and Alias (2014) in their study, it was established that
there is a positive and significant relationship between networking and access to finance.
5.4 Conclusions
5.4.1 Access to Finance and Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
The study concluded that a lot of entrepreneurs started their business using their savings
and when applying for a loan they also feel free to disclose information regarding their
business when applying for a loan. However, due to lack of enough of cash flow
entrepreneurs prefer loans from friends and family. Entrepreneurs are also not able to
access loan because they use their business savings and they also lack business records
has made it hard for entrepreneurs to access loans.
53
5.4.2 Lending Policy on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
In conclusion, respondents get loan from other financial institutions due to lack of
collateral and they also consider the amount of interest rate the microfinance institution
are offering before applying for a loan. Entrepreneurs are also not able to get loan form
microfinance institutions because transaction costs are usually high, short loan repayment
period and lack of enough assets and group financial has not helped entrepreneurs to pay
their loan
5.4.3 Capacity Building on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
Training has helped Bodaboda entrepreneurs grow their business and sales and it has also
helped them understand terms and conditions required before applying for a loan.
Networking has also helped Bodaboda operators to share knowledge and learn new skills.
However, respondents have not attended a training offered by microfinance institutions to
help them understand procedures and some were not sure is they need more business
training to access loans. In addition, they also do not have a business plan that they can
use when applying for loans form microfinance institutions.
5.5 Recommendations
5.5.1 Recommendation for Improvement
5.5.1.1 Access to Finance and Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
MFIs should conduct an awareness campaign to encourage Bodaboda operators to save
more. This will help their shares increase. It was also recommended that Bodaboda
operators should be encouraged to register their business, have accurate documentation of
transaction and financial activities as well as good business planning. This will reduce
information asymmetry and make it easy for them to access loans from MFIs.
5.5.1.2 Lending Policy on Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
There is need for MFIs and government to come up with a strategy to provide
entrepreneurs with loans at a lower interest rate, reduce the transaction cost, increase
repayment period, make the application process user friendly and easy and minimize
penalty charged to businesses that are not able to repay their loans on time. This will
encourage a lot of entrepreneurs to apply for loans thus contribute towards general output
in the economy.
54
5.5.1.3 Capacity Building Performance of Bodaboda Entrepreneurs
Based on findings it is recommended that MFIs should offer entrepreneurs short courses.
Through this, entrepreneurs will be able to gain more knowledge and skills on financial
management, book keeping, preparing financial statements and budgeting. Entrepreneurs
will also be able to know services that MFIs provide, procedures and how to apply for
those services.
5.5.2 Recommendations for Further Studies
The study only focused on effect of microfinance institutions on performance of
entrepreneurship in Kenya and it looked at factors affecting access to finance, lending
policy and capacity building. Very few studies have been done on capacity building
therefore, more studied should be done. In addition, research should also be done to
identify other factors that might affect performance of entrepreneurship in terms of access
to finance.
55
REFERENCES
Aarakit S. M. & Kimbugwe F. K. (2015). The Relationship between Social networks and
Firm Performance in Kampala, Uganda. International Journal of Social Science
and Economics Invention, 1(1), 69.
Abdel, H., A., Abdimajid, O., A., & Ali, Y. S. A. (2013). The Accessibility of
Microfinance for Small Businesses in Mogadishu, Somalia. International Journal
of Humanities and Social Science, 3 (11), 172-180.
Abdi, M., M., & Gikandi, J. (2016). Effects of interest rate on credit access of small and
medium enterprises in Garissa County. International Journal of Finance and
Accounting, 1 (1), 1-14.
Abdinor, D. S. (2013). The effect of microfinance institution lending on the growth of
small and medium enterprise in Somalia. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to
University of Nairobi.
Abereijo, I. O., & Fayomi, A. O. (2005). Innovative approach to SME financing in
Nigeria: A review of small and medium industries equity investment scheme (
SMIEIS). Journal of Social Sciences, 11(3), 219-227.
Adomako-Ansah, F. K. & Kwabena, F. (2012). Determinants of small and medium
enterprise (SME) financing by financial institutions in Ghana. Unpublished
Thesis Submitted to Kwame Nkrumah University.
Akanji, O. O. (2006). Microfinance as a strategy for poverty reduction. Central Bank of
Nigeria Economic and Financial Review, 39(4), 111-134.
Akm, S. (2016). Community-Based developmental entrepreneurship: Linking
microfinance with ecosystem services. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to
University of Manitoba.
Andoh, F., K., & Nunoo, J. (2014). Sustaining Small and Medium Enterprises through
Financial service utilization: does financial literacy matter? Retrieved on 10th June
2019 from https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/123418/.
Ashe, F., Treanor, L., & Mahmood, S. (2011). Microfinance and women entrepreneurs in
Pakistan. International journal of gender and entrepreneurship. 3(3), 265-274.
56
Aunga, D. A. O. (2017). Challenges Facing Small Scale Entrepreneurs in Accessing
Loan from Banks at Ngongongare, Meru District, Arusha Region in Tanzania.
Journal of Business and Management, 19(3), 103-113.
Bailey, R. A. (2008). The design of comparative experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Bawuah, B.,Yakubu, A., S.,& Alhassan, M. (2014). The effects of interest rate on micro,
small and medium enterprises financing decision in Wa Municipality of Ghana.
International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 4 (4), 81-90.
Bbenkele, E. K. (2007). An investigation of small and medium enterprises perceptions
towards services offered by commercial banks in South Africa. African journal of
accounting, economics, finance and banking research, 1(1), 1-13.
Beal, D., J., & Goyen, M. (2015).Why do we invest ethically? The Journal of Investing,
14(3), 66-77.
Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Singer, D. (2013). Is small beautiful? Financial structure,
size and access to finance. World Development, 52, 19-33.
Bello, G. B. (2013). An assessment of the contributions of microfinance on the growth of
small and medium enterprises (MSEs) in Nigeria. International journal of
Innovative Research in Management, 2(8), 16 – 23.
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2002). Small business credit availability and relationship
lending: The importance of bank organizational structure. The Economic Journal,
112(477).
Bett, A., (2016). Factors influencing growth of small scale businesses in Bomet
Constituency Unpublished Thesis Submitted to University of Nairobi.
Bluman, A. G. (2007). Elementary statistics: A step by step approach (6th ed.). New
York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Bodaboda Safety Association of Kenya (2019). Bodaboda Operators. Retrieved on 13th
March 2019 from https://bak.co.ke/
57
Bragg, S. M. (2010).The Ultimate Accountants' Reference: Including GAAP, IRS & SEC
Regulations, Leases and More (3rded). New York, New York John Wiley & Sons
Inc.
Bramuel, K. K. (2013).Factors influencing growth and development of small and medium
enterprises in Kenya. A case of Huruma Division, Nairobi County. Unpublished
Thesis Submitted to University of Nairobi.
Bushee, B., J., & Leuz, C. (2005) ‘Economic consequences of SEC disclosure regulation:
evidence from the OTC bulletin board’. Journal of Accounting and Economics,
39, 233–264.
Canton, E., Grilo, I., Monteagudo, J., & Van der Zwan, P. (2013). Perceived credit
constraints in the European Union. Small Business Economics, 41(3), 701-715.
Cassar, G. (2004). The financing of business start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing,
19(2), 261-283
Charilaos, M. (2017). Ownership structure and access to finance in developing countries,
Applied Economics, 49:32, 3195-3213.
Chege, S. M. (2013). Influence of capacity building on financial performance and growth
of women owned small and medium enterprises in Gikomba Market, Nairobi
County, Kenya. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to University of Nairobi
Cheng, H., Ya, W., & Zhifei, L. (2014).Analysis on Financing Difficulties for SMEs due
to Asymmetric Information. Global Disclosure of Economics and Business, 3
(2), 28-31.
Chittithaworn, C., Islam, M., A., Keawchana, T., & Yusuf, D. H. M. (2011). Factors
Affecting Business Success of Small & Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Thailand.
Asian Social Science Journal. 7(5), 180-190.
Chiyah, B., N., & Forchu, Z. N. (2010). The impact of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in
the development of small and medium size businesses (SMEs) in Cameroon. A
case study of Cam CCUL. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Swedish University.
Chong, F. (2010). Evaluating the credit management of micro-enterprises. WSEAS
transactions on Business and Economics, 2(7), 149-159.
Chua, J., H, Chrisman, J., J, Kellermanns, F., W., & Wu, Z. (2011). Family involvement
and new venture debt financing. J of Bus Vent, 26(4), 472-488.
58
Churchill, G., A., & Iacobucci, D. (2018). Marketing research: Methodological
foundations (12th ed). Nashville, TN: South-Western College.
Cooper, D. & Schindler, P. (2008). Business Research Methods. (9th ed.).New York, NY:
Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Cooper, D. & Schindler, P. (2012). Business Research Methods. (12th ed.).New York,
NY: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Cooper, D., R., & Schindler, P. S. (2013). Business Research Methods. (12th Ed). New
York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education.
Cooper, D. & Schindler, P. (2014). Business Research Methods. (13th ed.).New York,
NY: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Coulthard, M., & Loos, J. (2007). Networking, the missing link in firm based
entrepreneurial orientation (EO) performance models. Monash University
Business and Economics Working Paper, 1-13.
Deakins, D., D., North, R., Baldock, G., & Whittam, G. (2008). SMEs’ Access to
Finance: Is there still a debt finance gap? Belfast, NIR: Institute for Small
Business & Entrepreneurship. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Middlesex
University.
Donkor, K. (2012). Financial illiteracy dilemma, business guide. Retrieved 14th May 2019
from www.thestatesmanonline.com/pages/news-detail.php?section.
Essien, U., A., & Chukwuemeka, A. J. (2012).An analysis of access to credit markets and
the performance of small scale agro-based enterprises in the Niger delta region of
Nigeria. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 2(3),105-120.
European Commission (2013). Joint Commission/ECB report: Access to finance and
finding customers the most pressing problems for SMEs. Retrieved on May 14th
from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-980_en.htm.
Fatoki, O., & Odeyemi, A. (2010). The determinants of access to trade credit by new
SMEs in South Africa. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 2763.
Fatoki, O., O., & Smit, A. V. A. (2011). Constraints to credit access by new SMEs in
South Africa: A supply-side analysis. African Journal of Business Management,
5(4),1413-1425.
59
Frimpong S. (2014). Effect of demand-side factors on access to external finance by micro,
small and medium manufacturing enterprises in Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana.
Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Kenyatta University.
Gall, M., D., Gall, J., R., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction
(8th ed). Utah State, Oregon. Pearson International Edition.
Garrett, J. F. (2009). Bank and their customers (1st ed). New York, Dobbs Ferry: Oceana
Publications.
Gichuki, V. W. (2012). Challenges faced by small and medium garment enterprises in
financing business operations within Umoja-Embakasi Constituency. Unpublished
Thesis Submitted to Kenyatta University.
Gichure, J. M. (2016). Financial market failure constraints and access to finance by small
and medium enterprises in Kenya. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Jomo
Kenyatta University.
Gitman, L. J. (2003). The principles of managerial finance (7th ed.). New York, New
York: Pearson Education Inc.
Gitonga, B. D. (2012). Micro-crediting for low income earners. Unpublished Thesis
Submitted to University of Nairobi.
GrowthFin. (2008). SME Risk capital Fund: Constraints to Kenyan Institutional
Investment. Retrieved on 14th May 2019 from
http://www.fsdkenya.org/pdf_documents/FSD-
SME_Risk_Capital_Funds.pdf.
Gunto, M., & Alias, M. H. (2014). The impact of networking on the SMEs’ ability to
access financial government support in Malaysia. South East Asia Journal of
Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 5(3), 9-17.
Hala, H. E. H. (2018). Impact of Microfinance on Entrepreneurial Development: The
Case of Egypt. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9 (90), 68-
76.
Haron, H., Said, S., B., Jayaraman, K. & Ismail, I. (2013). Factors Influencing Small
Medium Enterprises (SMES) in Obtaining Loan. International Journal of
Business and Social Science, 4 (15), 182-195.
60
Hassan, N. B., Chin, S. T. S., Yeow, J. A., & Rom, N. M. (2011). Financial constraints
and opportunities of micro enterprise entrepreneurs: A theoretical framework.
International Conference on Business and Economics Research, (1),165-168.
Heshmati, N. (2013). The impact of networking on access to bank finance for SMEs:
Comparison of Iran and Sweden. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Halmstad
University.
HongboDuan, X., H., & Hongbo, Y. (2009). “An Analysis of Causes for SME‟s
financing difficulty”. International Journal of Business Management, 4 (6),
73-75.
Irwin, D., & Scott, J. M. (2010). Barriers faced by SMEs in raising bank finance.
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research,16(3), 245-259.
Joseph, K. (2013). Financing small and micro enterprises in Ghana. Challenges and
determinant in accessing bank credit. Ghana. International Journal of Research In
Social Sciences, 2(3), 12-25
Kabahanga, P. M. (2013). Business Development Services: A critical ingredient to
sustainable microfinance service.
Kakuru, H. (2013). Financing Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs). Uganda’s
experience. Bank of Uganda working paper, WP/03/01.
Kamau, A. T. (2010). Assessment of strategies adopted by microfinance institutions to
survive and grow in the banking industry. A survey of selected MFIs in Kenya.
Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Kenyatta University.
Karajkov, R. (2009). Bridging the Gap: Access to Risk Finance for Early-Stage SMEs in
Southeast Europe. Retrieved on 14th May 2019 from
http://www.incubat.ro/uploads/Publicatii_Investment_SMS_report.pdf.
Katambo, H. (2016). Effect of networking on performance of small and medium sized
audit firms in Nairobi. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to KCA University.
Kibas, P. (2001). Impact of Credit on Women operated Micro-Enterprises in UasinGishu
District. Negotiating social space: East African Micro-enterprises, 197-222.
Kilby, P. (2012). Failure of SMEEIS Led to Microfinance Bank. Business Day, Wed,
Fed. 15th.
61
Kimaiyo, D. (2016). Factors limiting small and medium enterprises access to credit in
Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Unpublished thesis Submitted to university of
Nairobi.
Kimanzi, V. K. (2016). Influence of micro finance services on growth of women owned
enterprises in Kitui Central Sub-County. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to South
Eastern Kenya University.
King, K., & McGrath, S. (2012). Globalization, Enterprise and Knowledge .Symposium:
Oxford University Press.
Kira, A., R., & Zhongzhi, H. (2012). The impact of firm characteristics in access of
financing by small and medium-sized enterprises in Tanzania. International
Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 108-113.
Kisaka, S., E., & Mwewa, N. M. (2014). Effects of Micro-credit, Micro-savings and
Training on the Growth of Small and Medium Enterprises in Machakos County in
Kenya. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(7), 43-49.
Kenya National BS, (2010). Rural and Urban Transport. Retrieved on 15th October 2015
from https://www.knbs.or.ke/download/kenya-facts-2010/.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. (2nd ed). New
Delhi, IN New Age International Publishers.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2009). Methods of educational and social science research: The logic
of methods (3rd ed.). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Kumar, A., & Barrett, F. (2008). Stuck in traffic: Urban transport in Africa. AICD
Background paper, 1. Retrieved on 13th September from
http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTAFRSUBSAHTRA/Resources/Stuck-in-
Traffic.pdf.
Kumar, A., & Francisco, M. (2005). “Enterprise size, financing patterns and credit
constraints in Brazil: Analysis of data from the Investment Climate Assessment
Survey.” World Bank working paper No.49.
Kushoka, I. (2013). “Contribution of Microfinance Institutions to Entrepreneurship
Development in Tanzania”. International Journal of Business and Management
Tomorrow, 3 (3), 2249-9962.
62
Lama, A., K., & Shrestha, A. K. (2011). Factors influencing in networking activities in
SMEs an exploratory study of factors that initiate networking activities in
case of SMEs. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Umea University Sweden.
Macharia, G. P. (2012). Effects of access to finance on micro and small enterprises
investment growth in Ongata Rongai Township. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to
University of Nairobi.
Madole, H. (2013). The impact of microfinance credit on the performance of SMEs in
Tanzania: A case study of national microfinance bank Morogoro. Unpublished
Thesis Submitted to Mzumbe University.
Malach, P., A., Lerner, M., & Schwartz, D. (2010). Gender differences in
entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis.
Equality, diversity and inclusion. An International Journal, 29(2), 186-198.
Mallick, R. (2002). Implementing and evaluating microcredit in Bangladesh.
Development in Practice, 12(2), 153-163.
Mano, R. S. (2014). Social media and online health services: A health empowerment
perspective to online health information. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 404-
412.
Mathenge, G. M. (2011). The effect of micro finance institutions services on the
financial performance of micro and small enterprises in India Division.
Unpublished Thesis Submitted to University of Nairobi.
Mazanai, M., & Fatoki, O. (2012). “Access to Finance in the SME sector: A South
African Perspective”. Asian Journal of Business Management, 1, 58-6.
Mazumder, M., S., U., & Wencong, L. (2013). Micro-credit and poverty reduction: a case
of Bangladesh. Prague economic papers, 22(3), 403-417.
Mbithe, M. N. (2013). “The Effects of Microfinance services on the Growth of Small and
Medium Enterprises in Machakos County.” Unpublished Thesis Submitted to
University of Nairobi.
Ministry of Economic Affairs (MoEA) & Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2012).
Kingdom of Bhutan: micro, small and medium-sized enterprise sector
development programme: competitiveness study, MoEA, Royal Government of
Bhutan, Thimphu, Bhutan.
63
Mokua, K. (2013). Factors influencing credit financing of small scale business
enterprises, in Kisii County, Kenya. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to University
of Nairobi.
Morobe, D. M. (2015). The effect of micro finance loans on the financial performance of
small and medium enterprises in Nairobi County. Unpublished Thesis Submitted
to the University of Nairobi.
Moulson, N. D. R. (2015). "How Millennial Generation Entrepreneurs Use Mentors to
Improve Business Performance." Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Walden
University.
Mugenda, O., M., & Mugenda, A. G. (1999) Research Methods: Quantitative and
Qualitative Approaches. Acts Press, Nairobi.
Mugenda, O., M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative qualitative
and Approaches. Nairobi: African Centre for Technology Studies.
Munyiri, M. (2010).Lending policies and their effects on performance of Commercial
Banks in Kenya. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to University of Nairobi.
Muogbo, U., S., & Tomola, O. (2018). The Impact of Microfinance Bank on
Entrepreneurship Development in Nigeria. Journal of Business and Economic
Development, 3(2), 51-61.
Musamali, M., M., & Tarus, D. K. (2013). Does firm profile influence financial access
among small and medium enterprises in Kenya? Asian Economic and Financial
Review, 3(6), 714-723.
Muthoka, J. M. (2012). Effect of microfinance on financial sustainability of small and
medium enterprises in Nairobi East District. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to
University of Nairobi.
Mwangi, S. W. (2011). Factors affecting growth of micro and small enterprises funded by
micro Kenyatta University Library Repository.
Nanyondo, M., Kamukama, N., Nkundabanyanga, S., & Tauringana, V. (2014). Quality
of financial statements, information asymmetry, perceived risk and access to
finance by Ugandan SMEs. International Journal of Management Practice, 7(4),
324-340.
64
Natarajan, D. (2004). The role of micro finance in the growth of small and medium size
industries. Retrieved on 12th June 2019 from https://www.academia.edu/1813923
8/the_role_of_micro_finance_in_the_growth_of_small_and_medium_size_industr
ies
Ngoc, T., B., Le, T., & Nguyen, T. B. (2009). The impact of networking on bank
financing: The case of small and medium enterprises in Vietnam.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 867-887.
Nyabwanga, R.N., Ojera, P., Otieno, S. & Nyakundi, F.N. (2013). An Empirical Analysis
of the Liquidity, Solvency and Financial Health of Small and Medium Sized
Enterprises in Kisii Municipality, Kenya. European Journal of Business and
Management, 5(8), 1-15.
Ogindo, R. (2006). An assessment of performance of MFIs in Kenya. Unpublished Thesis
Submitted to University of Nairobi.
Ogunleye, E. (2009). Post-formation & transmutation: challenges, prospects and key
success factors in MFIs. Being a paper presented at a conference of Directors of
MFIs organized by CIBN, Ibadan.
Ojo, O. (2009). Impact of microfinance on entrepreneurial development: The case of
Nigeria. The International Conference on Economics and Administration, Faculty
of Administration and Business, University of Bucharest, Romania ICEA – FAA
Bucharest, 14-15th November.
Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2006). Firm growth and liquidity constraints: A dynamic
analysis. Small Business Economics, 27(2-3), 139-156.
Olomi, D., Mori, N., Mduma, E., & Urassa, G. (2008).Constraints to access to capital by
Tanzanian SMEs. Dar-es Salaam: REPOA.
Olutunla, G., T., & Obamuyi, T. M. (2008). An empirical analysis of factors associated
with the probability of Small and Medium Enterprises in Nigeria. African Journal
of business management, 2(11), 195 – 200.
Omondi, R., I., A., & Jagongo, A. (2018). Microfinance services and financial
performance of small and medium enterprises of youth SMEs in Kisumu
65
County, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1),
24-43.
Omwono, G., Maizs, E., K., & Toroitich, K. K.(2016). Effect of Microfinance Services
on Entrepreneurship Development in Uasin-Gishu County Kenya. International
Journal of Research in Business Studies and Management, 3 (8), 1-14.
Onyango, J. (2010). Credit bureau to open fund taps for SMEs. Retrieved on May
18th2019 from http://www.businessdailyafrica. com/Company%20Industry/Credi
t%20bureau%20to%20open%20fund%20taps%20for%20SMEs//539550/892900/-
/106d1l1/-/index.html
Onyango, K. A. O. (2011). The role of microfinance institutions in the growth of small
and medium enterprises (SMEs).A case of SMEs in Gikomba Market. Nairobi.
Kenya. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to the Management University of Africa.
Orodho, A. J. (2003). Essentials of Educational and Social Sciences Research Method.
Nairobi: Masola Publishers.
Orodho, J. A. (2008). Techniques of Writing Research Proposals and Reports in
Educational and Social Sciences. Kanezja HP Enterprises, Maseno, Kenya.
Oseph, W. A. (2014). Effects of Microfinance institutions’ services on sustainability of
small enterprises: A survey of small enterprises in Langas Estate, Eldoret Town.
Unpublished Thesis Submitted to Kisii University
Owuor, M. A. (2015). Effect of microfinance services on the growth of women owned
small and medium enterprises in Ruiru Sub-County. Unpublished Thesis
Submitted to University of Nairobi.
Pandula, G. (2011). An empirical investigation of small and medium enterprises Access
to finance: The case of an emerging economy. Proceedings of the ASBBS Annual
Conference (pp. 255-73), Las Vegas.
Pierluigi, M., & Valentina, P. (2017)."Family firms and access to credit. Is family
ownership beneficial?," CERBE Working Papers wpC23, CERBE Center for
Relationship Banking and Economics.
Pius, M. M. (2010). Influence of microcredit finance on the growth of small scale women
entrepreneurs in Kenya. Unpublished thesis Submitted to university of Nairobi.
66
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research
paradigms, sampling issues and instruments development. International Journal
of Economics & Management Sciences, 6(2), 1-5.
Rono, L. D. C (2018). Microcredit and its relationship to the growth of small and medium
enterprises in Konoin Sub-county, Kenya. International Journal of Advance
Research, 6(4), 961-968.
Rukaria, G. K. (2015). Challenges affecting transformation of microfinance institutions
into deposit taking financial institutions in Kenya. Unpublished Thesis
Submitted to Jomo Kenyatta University.
Sakthi, G. (2011). “The Role of Microfinance Institutions in the Development of
Entrepreneurs” .International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 4(2),
300-3005.
Sakwa, M. A. (2017). Access to credit and performance of small and medium enterprises
in turbo sub county, Kenya. Unpublished Thesis Submitted to University of
Nairobi
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students
(6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research methods for business students
(11th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
Schayek, R., & Dvir, D. (2011). The impact of public assistance programs on small
businesses: strategic planning, entrepreneurship resources usage, and market
orientation as mediating variables. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 22(1), 67-
98.
Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity
nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sievers, M., & Vandenberg, P. (2004). ‘Synergies through Linkages: Who Benefits from
Linking Microfinance and Business Development Services?’, in: World
Development, 35 (8), 1341-1358
Struwig, M., Struwig, F. W., & Stead, G. B. (2001). Planning, reporting & designing
research (4th ed). South Africa, SA: Pearson.
67
Sungur, O. (2015). Business incubators, networking and firm survival: evidence from
Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 6(5), 136-149.
Tafadzwa M., & Olawale, F. (2013). The Impact of Networking on Access to Debt
Finance and Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in South Africa. J
Economics, 4(2), 97-104.
Thietart, R. A. (2001). Doing management research: a comprehensive guide (1st ed).
Utah State, Oregon. Sage Publication.
Wakaba, S. W. (2014). The effect of microfinance credit on the financial performance of
small and medium enterprises in Kiambu County, Kenya. Unpublished Thesis
Submitted to University of Nairobi.
Wambugu, F., W., & Ngugi, J. K. (2012). Factors Influencing Sustainability of
Microfinance Institutions in Kenya: A Case of Kenya Women Finance Trust.
International Journal of Innovative Research & Development,1(11), 519 -537.
Williams, C. (2007). Rеsеarch Methods. Journal of Business & Economic Research, 5
(3). 18-27
World Bank (2010).Scaling up SME Access to Financial Services in the Developing
World. In: Report of the G20 Seoul Summit.
Yasin, A. (2013). “The Accessibility of Microfinance for Small Businesses in Mogadishu,
Somalia”. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 11(3), 172-
173
Yusuf. S. A. A. J. (2014). Effect of microfinance on small scale enterprise in Osun State,
Nigeria. American Journal of Contemporary research, 4 (6), 190-200.
Zarook, T., Rahman, M. M., & Khanam, R. (2013).The impact of demographic factors on
accessing finance in Libya's SMEs. International Journal of Business and
Management, 8(14), 55-65.
Zindiye, S. (2008). An empirical investigation into the factors affecting the performance
of Small and Medium enterprises in the manufacturing sector of Harare,
Zimbabwe. (p.78). Unpublished Thesis Submitted to University of Fort Hare
68
APPENDIX I: QUESTIONNAIRE
Effect of Microfinance Institutions on Performance of Entrepreneurship in Kenya:
A Case of Bodaboda Business in Nairobi County
This questionnaire helps in data collection for academic purpose only. The research
intends to give an analysis of effects of microfinance institutions on performance of
entrepreneurship in Kenya. All information attained, will be treated confidentiality. Do
not incorporate identification or names in the questionnaire.
SECTION A: DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS
Please answer every question as outlined by using a tick (√) in the option that applies
1. What is your Age?
Below 25 years25-30 years
31-39years
40 years and Above
2. What is your Gender? Male Female
3. What is your marital statues
Single Married Divorced Widowed
4. What is your highest level of education?
Primary Secondary education Certificate Diploma
Degree Other
5. How long have been running this business?
0 - 2 years 3 - 5 years 6-8 years Above 9 years
6. What type of financing have you accessed?
Bank Loan Loan from Sacco Personal Savings Loan from Family
Loan from Friends
69
SECTION B: FACTORS AFFECTING ACCESS TO FINANCE
Please indicate your opinion as per the level of disagreement or agreement with the
outline statement using 1 to 5 scale guideline. 5= Strongly Agree 2- Agree, 3= Neutral,
4 =Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree.
SECTION C: LENDING POLICY
Please indicate your opinion as per the level of disagreement or agreement with the
outline statement using 1 to 5 scale guideline. 5= Strongly Agree 2- Agree, 3= Neutral,
4 =Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree.
LENDING POLICY 1 2 3 4 5
1 I have enough assets to use as security when
accessing loan from financial institutions.
2 I am able to easily repay my loan
3 Due to lack of collateral I get loans from other
sources
4 The use of group financing has helped me pay my
loan
5 I do not like to apply for loans due to complex
application procedures
6 Businesses that are registered are able to access
loan easily
7 I consider the amount of interest rates charged
before seeking finance
8 I do not take loans due to short loan repayment
9 Micro financial intuitions transaction costs are
usually higher thus, making me not apply for loans
10 I am usually discouraged to apply for a loan
because they usually give me less money than what
I requested
11 I face challenges accessing finance due to high
interest rate
70
12 Micro financial institutions charges high penalties
on credit default.
SECTION D: CAPACITY BUILDING
Please indicate your opinion as per the level of disagreement or agreement with the
outline statement using 1 to 5 scale guideline. 5= Strongly Agree 2- Agree, 3= Neutral,
4 =Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree.
CAPACITY BUILDING 1 2 3 4 5
1 I am aware of loans offered by micro financial
institutions
2 I require more business training to access loans
3 I have a business plan that I can use when applying
for money from microfinance institutions
4 Business training has a positive effect on sales
growth trend in my business
5 I am able to understand terms and conditions
required before applying for a loan
6 Through training I was able to gain skills and
experience needed to run my business
7 I have attended a training offered by microfinance
institutions to help me understand procedures
related to loan application
8 The training I attended helped me grow my
business
9 Keeping the right network has enabled me get
access to loans
10 Through networking I was able to share knowledge
and learn new skills
11 Appling for a loan as a group is easy because I can
get co guarantors
71
SECTION E: FINANCIAL PERFROMANCE
Please indicate your opinion as per the level of disagreement or agreement with the
outline statement using 1 to 5 scale guideline. 5= Strongly Agree 2- Agree, 3= Neutral,
4 =Disagree, 1= Strongly Disagree.
FINANCIAL PERFROMANCE 1 2 3 4 5
1 Access to finance has helped me grow my business
2 Through training, my financial performance has
increased
3 Savings has contributed to my financial
performance
4 I am able to achieve my targets that I set for each
task
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION