Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters 183
Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters
Constructs and indicators
Environmental complexity
In the last five years, how easy was it to predict the effect of events and trends on your firm in the following areas? (1 = very easy, 5 = very difficult)
Innovations related to product design and/or functionality
Potential trends related to customer preferences
Market entry or exit by competitors
Innovations related to product marketing/sales strategies
Cost and/or quality of inputs (e.g., raw materials, semi-finished products)
Strategies of competitors
Environmental dynamism
To what extent do you agree with the following statements with respect to the dynamism of your market environment? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
Our customers tend to look for new products all the time
We are witnessing demand for our products and services from customers who never bought them before
New customers tend to have product-related needs that are different from those of our existing customers
Resource and coordination flexibility
To what extent do you agree with the following statements with respect to your flexibility compared to that of your competitors? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
The range of alternative products that we can develop, manufacture, distribute and market, is larger
Adaptating our product strategy flexibly (e.g., design, quantities) is easier for us
The use of modular product development and manufacturing processes makes us more flexible
The use of standardized, electronic interfaces with our customers and suppliers makes us more flexible
The cooperation with other firms (e.g., strategic alliances, networks) makes us more flexible
Loadings
0.74
0.68
0.69
0.58
0.46
0.76
0.68
0.77
0.83
0.39
0.69
0.46
0.69
0.60
Variance Inflation Factors (VIF)
1.33
1.46
1.29
1.35
1.15
1.31
1.27
1.50
1.34
1.07
1.25
1.33
1.22
1.15
184 Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters
Constructs and indicators Loadings Variance Inflation Factors (VIF)
0.51
0.76
0.94
1.16
1.58
1.62
Quick, cost-efficient product development process To what extent do you agree with the following statements with respect to your product development process? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
For most of the products we have developed over the last five years, the 0.37 1.10 most important product characteristics were already set at the beginning of the product development process
Over the last five years, we have frequently reacted to competitors' innovations by quickly changing our product portfolio
Our product development process is less costly than that of most companies in our line of business
When it comes to the development and introduction of products, we are quicker than most companies in our line of business
Product development process focused on creativity and innovation To what extent do you agree with the following statements with respect to your product development process? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
When it comes to product development, we are better than our competitors at anticipating future customer needs
Our product introductions over the last five years have significantly influenced our line of business
The products we have developed over the last five years were unique on the market at the time they were introduced
Isolating mechanisms
To what extent do you agree with the following statements with respect to your capabilities and resources? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
It is difficult for outsiders to identify the capabilities and resources we use 0.40 1.11 to distinguish ourselves from competitors
Our business units and/or functional units (e.g., marketing, R&D, sales) are 0.71 1.44 closely intertwined and support each other, thereby improving our competitiveness
Compared to our major competitors, our capabilities and resources com- 0.88 1.58 plement each other extremely well
Our competitors could only imitate our distinctive capabilities and re- 0.61 1.35 sources if they invested the same amount of time in building them as we do
0.95
0.79
0.67
1.38
2.21
2.18
Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters 185
Constructs and indicators Loadings Variance Inflation Factors (VIF)
Our most important capabilities and resources require a critical mass (e.̂ with respect to firm size, sales network, customer awareness), without which they could not be imitated
0.28 1.24
Table 14: Measurement model parameters: Formative indicators
Constructs and indicators
Industry foresight
Over the last five years, have your firm's efforts to identify trends been adequate to contribute to... (1 = not adequate, 5 = adequate)
... its awareness of problems and opportunities?
... its knowledge of its own strengths and weaknesses?
... its awareness of environmental conditions?
... its early identification of changing customer needs?
Brand strength
Relative to your competitors, how would you rank your brand (or brands) in terms of the following attributes? (1 = weaker, 5 = stronger)
Brand prestige
Quality (e.g., design, workmanship, materials) that customers associate with our brand(s)
Trust in our brand(s)
High level of awareness of our brand(s) among existing and potential customers
High loyalty of our customers to our brand(s)
Internal transparency
To what extent do you agree with the following statements? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
In this firn, it is easy to talk with virtually anyone you need to, regardless of rank or position
There is ample opportunity for informal "hall talk" among individuals from different departments in
1 this firm
Loadings
0.87
0.87
0.86
0.84
0.99
0.99
1.00
0.99
0.99
0.69
0.85
Convergent validity (AVE)
0.74
0.98
0.69
Composite reliability
0.92
1.00
0.87
Discriminant validity*
0.25
0.01
0.14
186 Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters
Constructs and indicators Loadings Convergent validity (AVE)
In this firm, employees from different departments 0.91 feel comfortable calling each other when the need arises
Ability to adapt to change 0.80
To what extent do you agree with the following statements? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
Overall, our firm has adapted well to external 0.89 change over the past five years
Our firm will be able to react adequately to future 0.90 change
Ability to create change 0.87
To what extent do you agree with the following statements? (1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
Our firm has succeeded in shaping its market envi- 0,95 ronment significantly over the past five years
Our firm will be able to positively influence its mar- 0.91 ket environment in the future
Compo- Discrimi-site nant reliabili- validity* ty
0.89 0.25
0.93 0.13
* The entry in each row is the highest squared correlation of the particular construct with another construct. This value needs to be below the one of AVE according to Fomell/Larcker 1981.
Table 15: Measurement model parameters: Reflective indicators
Firm performance
How would you rate the performance of your firm relative to competition in the past 5 years on each of the following dimensions? (1 = worse, 5 = better)
How important are the following dimensions for the long-term performance of your firm? (1 = not important, 5 = important)
Improvement of firm value Size of market share
Return on assets Sales growth
Retention of existing customers Return on sales
Acquisition of new customers Financial liquidity
Creation of customer satisfaction Retention of particularly qualified employees
Development of market share Cost management
This composite measure was built by multiplying the relative performance scores with the importance scores, and dividing the result by the sum of the importance scores.
Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters 187
Scope of areas being scanned; scope of areas for which forecasts are produced
How would you describe the search of your firm for information about the following areas? (Historical & current developments: 0 = Our search for information is mainly ad hoc, 1 = We systematically search for information; Future developments: 0 = We do not produce forecasts for this area, 1 = We produce forecasts for this area)
Product innovation and development Labor market conditions
Marketing innovations Demographics and social conditions
Trends in customer needs Political conditions and government regulations
Entry and exit of competition General economic conditions
Cost and/or quality of inputs Strategies of competitors
Technological conditions
The two composite measures were built by counting the number of areas that were (i) scanned systematically and (ii) for which forecasts were produced, respectively.
Frequency of scanning
For those areas, about which your firm systematically searches for information, please indicated the frequency of the information search. (In the on-line version of the questionnaire, only those areas appeared that the respondent had previously indicated his or her firm scanned systematically.)
(1 = seldom (yearly), 5 = continuously (daily))
Product innovation and development Labor market conditions
Marketing innovations Demographics and social conditions
Trends in customer needs Political conditions and government regulations
Entry and exit of competition General economic conditions
Cost and/or quality of inputs Strategies of competitors
Technological conditions
This composite measure was built by averaging the scores for all areas that were scanned systematically.
Scope of sources being used for scanning
How often does the top management of your firm use the following internal information sources to
get a sense of current and future trends?
(1 = seldom (yearly), 5 = continuously (daily))
Conversations with immediate peers or Computer/MIS reports or accounting (P&L) subordinates (H) reports (L)
Conversations with salesmen, staff specialists, or Special studies and newsletters (L)
other employees (H)
Formal meetings with the top management team (H) Emails, memos and letters from employees (L)
Formal meetings with other employees (H) Analysis of computer databases (L)
How often does the top management of your firm use the following external information sources to get a sense of current and future trends?
(1 = seldom (yearly), 5 = continuously (daily))
188 Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters
Attendance at conferences or trade shows (H) Newspapers and magazines (L)
Letters and phone calls from outsiders (H) Government notice or publications(L)
Personal contacts with suppliers, customers, and Co-operations with other firms, universities, or competitors (H) other research institutions (H)
Personal contacts with friends, colleagues, and Commercial databases (L) associates in other companies (H)
Market surveys (L) Consulting or information providers (H)
This composite measure was built by counting the number of internal and external information sources that were used at least frequently, i.e., which were given a score of 3 or above.
Intensity of use of high rich information sources
This composite measure was built by counting the number of internal and external high rich information sources (marked "H) that were used at least frequently, i.e., which were given a score of 3 or above.
Table 16: Measurement Model Parameters: Composite Measures
Strategy Types
To what extent do you agree with the following statements about the strategy of your firm?
(1 = disagree, 5 = agree)
Compared to our competitors, we search more intensively for opportunities to actively shape our market environment
We believe we can actively influence customer preferences
We usually aim at being the first ones to introduce new brands/products to the market, even if the brand/product may fail
It is important for our firm to identify changes in customer needs early on in order to set new product trends
To be successful in the long run, we believe that firms have to be able to anticipate customer preferences even before customers can express them by themselves
We only adjust our product portfolio and/or features of existing products when a trend has proven to be substantial
In our view, being a first mover with respect to the introduction of new products usually does not pay off in our market environment
In our view, a quick adaptation to changes is more advisable than trying to influence the market environment to one's own benefit
We try to differentiate ourselves from competition rather by an attractive price-value relationship than by more innovative products
The two groups of firms were built by comparing their average scores on the first five items with their average scores on the last four items. Firms were assigned to the "create change" group if their average score on the first five items exceeded their average scores on the last four items and vice versa. Firms with equal average scores on both item batteries were dropped from the group comparison analysis.
Table 17: Indicators of Strategy Types
Appendix: Questionnaire Items and Measurement Model Parameters 189
- M CQ 0)
o
^ a 4 si o <u
• S (SD
1^ S • M <Q
<i! 5
u
a
2 • «
c
s ^
^ s
s "So •o
S
^ -a «2 ^ 1 -o 5
CN
u u
u
u <
u <
s
H
in CQ
CQ
OQ
r^ CQ
CQ
;̂ UH
m
&
(SI
&
s ^
1 t*
I S
1 ^
ON
^ ©
P ^ d d
^
'« d
i n d
f S so d
A
, f l
^ u
-a 2
PQ
'"'
o o
s o
o o
W-)
o d
5
^ 0 0 ON
d
o o
o
d
o o
m o d
CM CQ
^ 0 0 ON
d
ON ON d
8 d
o d
8 d
NO
o d
CO
s; d
QO 0 ^
d
00 ON
d
m O O
oo O
d
o d
U-)
o d
03
QO ON
d
ON
d
§; d
QO ON
d
o d
0 0
o d
8 d
i n
o d
v n CQ
1
2
g ii
d
d
en o d
s d
o d
< N
d
^ d
ON
d
d
H
' - I
00
m d
CO
d
d
d
CM
d
<N
d
CM
d
CN
d
d
ON
d
b
^
«̂ 1/)
d
d
>n O
d
oo o d
s d
o d
o d
^ m q
CO en d
ON
d
CN ( N
d
£
a
5
<i1
^ ( N cn d
o ( N
d
d
O
d
o d
d
o d
^ o d
^ d
? d
ON
d
o m d
U
<
^H
§ d
0 0 cn d
ON CNl
d
d
O
d
o d
d
o d
^ o d
o d
O N
d
m
d
vn cn d
CSI
U <
S
1
a
^ cn cn d
NO cn d
'̂ d
o
d
o d
CN
d
o d
d
o
d
o
d
CN
d
r-
d
NO
d
r-
d
U U
1-H
d
cn cn d
CN
d
0 0
d
»n
d
o d
cn
d
o
d
CN
d
-d
^ d
2 d
g d
o d
8 d
( N u u
^ ^
References 191
References
Abernathy, F. H./Dunlop, J. T./Hammond, J. H./Weil, D. (1999): A Stitch in Time:
Lean Retailing and Transformation of Manufacturing - Lessons from the Apparel and
Textile Industry, New York.
Aguilar, F. J. (1967): Scanning the Business Environment, New York.
Alters, S./Hildebrandty L. (2005): Methodische Probleme bei der Erfolgsfaktorenfor-
schung: Messfehler, formative versus reflektive Indikatoren und die Wahl des Struk-
turgleichungs-Modells, unpublished paper, to be published in the Zeitschrift fiir be-
triebswirtschaftliche Forschung, Kiel/Berlin
Alchian, A. A. (1965): Some Economics of Property Rights, in: II Politico, 30, pp. 816-
829.
Amburgey, T. L./Kelly, DJBarnett, W. P. (1993): Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics
of Organizational Change, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 38 (1), pp. 51-73.
Amit, R./Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993): Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent, in:
Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1), pp. 33-46.
Anand, G./Ward, P. T. (2004): Fit, Flexibility and Performance in Manufacturing:
Coping with Dynamic Environments, in: Production and Operations Management, 13
(4), pp. 369-385.
Anonymous (2005): Bang & Olufsen holt auf, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,
29.11.2005, p. 17
Ansoff, H. I. (1972): The Concept of Strategic Management, in: Journal of Business
Policy, 2 (4), pp. 2-22.
Ansojf, H. I. (1975): Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals, in:
California Management Review, 18 (2), pp. 21-38.
192 References
Ansojf, H. I. (1976): Managing Surprise and Discontinuity: Strategic Response to
Weak Signals, in: Zeitschrift fiir betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 28, pp. 129-152.
Ansojf, H. I. (1979): The Changing Shape of the Strategic Problem, in: Schendel, D.
E./Hofer, C. W. (Eds.), Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and
Planning, Boston, pp. 30-44.
Ansoff, H. I. (1982): Managing Discontinuous Strategic Change: The Learning-Action
Approach, in: Ansoff, H. I./Bosman, A./Storm, P. M. (Eds.), Understanding and Man
aging Strategic Change: Contributions to the Theory and Practice of General Man
agement, Amsterdam, pp. 5-31.
Aragon-Correa, A. J./Sharma, S. (2003): A Contingent Resource-based View of Pro
active Corporate Environmental Strategy, in: Academy of Management Review, 28
(1), pp. 71-88.
Armstrong, J. S./Overton, T. S. (1977): Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,
in: Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3), pp. 396-402.
Arthur, W. B. (1989): Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by
Historical Events, in: The Economic Journal, 99 (394), pp. 116-131.
Astley, W. G./Van de Ven, A. H. (1983): Central Perspectives and Debates in Organiza
tion Theory, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (2), pp. 245-273.
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2005): Resolving the Capability-Rigidity Paradox in New Product
Innovation, in: Journal of Marketing, 69 (October 2005), pp. 61-83.
Audia, P. G./Locke, E. A./Smith, K. G. (2000): The Paradox of Success: An Archival
and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental
Change, in: Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), pp. 837-853.
Backhaus, K./Erichson, B./Plinke, W./Weiber, R. (2003): Multivariate Analysemetho-
den: Fine anwendungsorientierte Einfiihrung, 10th ed., Berlin, Heidelberg.
References 193
Bagozzi, R. P./Baumgartner, H. (1994): The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
and Hypothesis Testing, in: Bagozzi, R. P. (Ed.), Principles of Marketing Research,
Cambridge, MA, pp. 386-422.
Bain, J. S. (1956): Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge.
Bain, J. S. (1968): Industrial Organization, 2nd ed.. New York.
Baines, A./Langfield-Smith, K. (2003): Antecedents to Management Accounting
Change: A Structural Equation Approach, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society,
28 (7/8), pp. 675-698.
Barclay, D./Higgins, C./Thompson, R. (1995): The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Ap
proach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration,
in: Technology Studies, 2, pp. 285-309.
Barney, J. B. (1986a): Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business
Strategy, in: Management Science, 32 (10), pp. 1231-1241.
Barney, J. B. (1986b): Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an
Integrative Framework, in: Academy of Management Review, 11 (4), pp. 791-800.
Barney, J. B. (1991): Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, in: Jour
nal of Management, 17 (1), pp. 99-120.
Barney, J. B. (2001): Resource-based Theories of Competitive Advantage: A Ten-year
Retrospective on the Resource-based View, in: Journal of Management, 27 (6), pp.
643-650.
Barney, J. B./Arikan, A. M. (2001): The Resource-based View: Origins and Implica
tions, in: Hitt, M. A./Freeman, R. E./Harrison, J. S. (Eds.), The Blackwell Handbook
of Strategic Management, Oxford, pp. 124-188.
Barney, J. B./Hansen, M. H. (1994): Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Ad
vantage, in: Strategic Management Journal, 15 (8), pp. 175-190.
194 References
Barney, J. B./Wright, M./Ketchen, D. J. J. (2001): The Resource-based View of the
Firm: Ten Years after 1991, in: Journal of Management, 27 (6), pp. 625-641.
Bayus, B. L./Erickson, G./Jacobson, R. (2003): The Financial Rewards of New Product
Introductions in the Personal Computer Industry, in: Management Science, 49 (2), pp.
197-210.
Bhattacharya, SJKrishnan, V./Mahajan, V. (1998): Managing New Product Definition
in Highly Dynamic Environments, in: Management Science, 44 (11), pp. S50-S64.
Birkinshaw, J./Fey, C. F. (2000): Building an Internal Market System: Insights from
Five R&D Organizations, in: Birkinshaw, J./Hagstrom, P. (Eds.), The Flexible Firm:
Capability Management in Network Organizations, New York, pp. 149-175.
Black, J. A./Boal, K. B. (1994): Strategic Resources: Traits, Configurations, and Paths
to Sustainable Competitive Advantage, in: Strategic Management Journal, 15 (5), pp.
131-148.
Boeker, W. (1997): Strategic Change: The Influence of Managerial Characteristics and
Organizational Growth, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40 (1), pp. 152-170.
Bollen, K. A./Lennox, R. (1991): Conventional Wisdom on Measurement: A Structural
Equation Perspective, in: Psychological Bulletin, 110 (2), pp. 305-314.
Bonnin, A. R. (2002): The Fashion Industry in Galicia: Understanding the 'Zara' Phe
nomenon, in: European Planning Studies, 10 (4), pp. 519-527.
Bontis, N./Crossan, M. M./Hulland, J. (2002): Managing an Organizational Learning
System by Aligning Stocks and Flows, in: Journal of Management Studies, 39 (4), pp.
437-469.
Boschma, R. A./Frenken, K. (2004): Why Is Economic Geography Not an Evolution
ary Science?, RSAI World Congress, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 14-17 April 2004.
Bourgeois, III., L. J. (1980): Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration, in:
Academy of Management Review, 5(1), pp. 25-39.
References 195
Bourgeois, L, L. J. (1985): Strategic Goals, Perceived Uncertainty, and Economic Per
formance in Volatile Environments, in: Academy of Management Journal, 28 (3), pp.
548-573.
Boyd, B. K. (1990): Corporate Linkages and Organizational Environment: A Test of
the Resource Dependence Model, in: Strategic Management Journal, 11 (6), pp. 419-
430.
Boyd, B. K./Fulk, J. (1996): Executive Scanning and Perceived Uncertainty: A Multi
dimensional Model, in: Journal of Management, 22 (1), pp. 1-21.
Brown, S. LJEisenhardt, K. M. (1997): The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Com
plexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations, in:
Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, pp. 1-34.
Brown, T. J./Dacin, P. A. (1997): The Company and the Product: Corporate Associa
tions and Consumer Product Responses, in: Journal of Marketing, 61 (1), pp. 68-84.
Brush, T. H./Artz, K. W. (1999): Toward a Contingent Resource-based Theory: The
Impact of Information Asymmetry on the Value of Capabilities in Veterinary Medi
cine, in: Strategic Management Journal, 20 (3), pp. 223-250.
Cabral, L M. B. (2000): Stretching Firm and Brand Reputation, in: RAND Journal of
Economics, 31 (4), pp. 658-673.
Cagliano, R./Spina, G. (2000): Advanced Manufacturing Technologies and Strategi
cally Flexible Production, in: Journal of Operations Management, 18 (2), pp. 169-190.
Caves, R. E. (1980): Industrial Organization, Corporate Strategy and Structure, in:
Journal of Economic Literature, 18 (March 1980), pp. 64-92.
Caves, R. E./Porter, M. E. (1977): From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjec
tural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition, in: Quarterly Journal
of Economics, 91 (2), pp. 241-261.
196 References
Chaharbaghi, K./Lynch, R. (1999): Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Towards a
Dynamic Resource-based Strategy, in: Management Decision, 37 (1), pp. 45-50.
Chakravarthy, B. S. (1982): Adaptation: A Promising Metaphor for Strategic Man
agement, in: Academy of Management Review, 7(1), pp. 35-44.
Chakravarthy, B. S. (1997): A New Strategy Framework for Coping with Turbulence,
in: Sloan Management Review (Winter 1997), pp. 69-82.
Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1990): Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism,
Boston.
Charney, B. (2005): HP to Include Netscape Offering on New PCs, in: eWeek, 22
(40), pp. 34-34.
Chenhall, R. H./LangfieId-Smith, K. (1998): The Relationship Between Strategic Pri
orities, Management Techniques and Management Accounting: An Empirical Investi
gation Using a Systems Approach, in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23 (3),
pp. 243-264.
Chin, W. W. (1998): The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Mod
eling, in: Marcoulides, G. A. (Ed.), Modem Methods for Business Research, London,
pp. 295-336.
Churchill Jr., G. A. (1979): A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing
Constructs, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1), pp. 64-73.
Coase, R. (1937): The Nature of the Firm, in: Economica, 4, pp. 386-402.
Coase, R. (1960): The Problem of Social Cost, in: Journal of Law and Economics, 3
(1), pp. 1-44.
Coase, R. (1998): The New Institutional Economics, in: American Economic Review,
88 (2), pp. 72-74.
References 197
Cockburn, I. M./Henderson, R. M./Stern, S. (2000): Untangling the Origins of Com
petitive Advantage, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10-11), pp. 1123-1145.
Coff, R. W. (1999): When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The
Resource-based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power, in: Organization Science, 10
(2), pp. 119-133.
Cohen, W. M./Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on
Learning and Innovation, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), pp. 128-152.
Cohen, W. M./Levinthal, D. A. (1994): Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm, in: Man
agement Science, 40 (2), pp. 227-251.
Colbert, B. A. (2004): The Complex Resource-Based View: Implications for Theory
and Practice in Strategic Human Resource Management, in: Academy of Management
Review, 29 (3), pp. 341-358.
Collins, J. L. (2001): Flexible Specialization and the Garment Industry, in: Competi
tion & Change, 5, pp. 165-200.
Collis, D. J./Montgomery, C. A. (1995): Competing on Resources: Strategy in the
1990s, in: Harvard Business Review, July-August 1995, pp. 118-128.
Combs, J. G./Ketchen, D. J. J. (1999): Explaining Interfirm Cooperation and Perform
ance: Toward a Reconciliation of Predictions from the Resource-based View and Or
ganizational Economics, in: Strategic Management Journal, 20 (9), pp. 867-888.
Commons, J. R. (1932): The Problems of Correlating Law, Economics, and Ethics, in:
Wisconsin Law Review, 8(1), pp. 3-26.
Conant, J. S./Mokwa, M. P. (1990): Strategic Types, Distinctive Marketing Competen
cies and Organizational Performance: A Multiple-Measures-Based Study, in: Strategic
Management Journal, 11 (5), pp. 365-383.
198 References
Conner, K. R. (1991): A Historical Comparison of Resource-based Theory and Five
Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organisation Economics: Do We Have a New
Theory of the Firm?, in: Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 121-154.
Cool, K./Dierickx, I./Jemison, D. (1989): Business Strategy, Market Structure and
Risk-Return Relationships: A Structural Approach, in: Strategic Management Journal,
10 (6), pp. 507-522.
Courtney, H./Kirkland, J./Viguerie, P. (1997): Strategy under Uncertainty, in: Harvard
Business Review, November-December 1997, pp. 67-79.
Daft, R. LJLengel, R. H. (1984): Information Richness: A New Approach to Manage
rial Behavior and Organization Design, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, pp.
191-233.
Daft, R. LJSormunen, J./Parks, D. (1988): Chief Executive Scanning, Environmental
Characteristics, and Company Performance: An Empirical Study, in: Strategic Man
agement Journal, 9 (2), pp. 123-139.
Daft, R. L./Weick, K. E. (1984): Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation
Systems, in: Academy of Management Review, 9 (2), pp. 284-295.
Dahan, N. (2005): Can There Be a Resource-based View of Politics?, in: International
Studies of Management & Organization, 35 (2), pp. 8-27.
Das, T. K./Teng, B.-S. (2000): A Resource-based Theory of Strategic Alliances, in:
Journal of Management, 26 (1), pp. 31-61.
Datta, D. K./Rajagopalan, N./Zhang, Y. (2003): New CEO Openness to Change and
Strategic Persistence: the Moderating Role of Industry Characteristics, in: British
Journal of Management, 14 (2), pp. 101-114.
D'Aveni, R. A. (1994): Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Ma
neuvering, New York.
References 199
Dawar, N. (2004): What are Brands Good for?, in: Sloan Management Review, 46 (1),
pp. 31-37.
Day, G. S. (1994): The Capabilities of Market-driven Organizations, in: Journal of
Marketing, 58 (4), pp. 37-52.
Deephouse, D. L. (2000): Media Reputation as a Strategic Resource: An Integration of
Mass Communication and Resource-Based Theories, in: Journal of Management, 26
(6), pp. 1091-1112.
Demsetz, H. (1967): Toward a Theory of Property Rights, in: American Economic Re
view, 57 (2), pp. 347-359.
Denis, J.-L./Lamothe, L./Langley, A. (2001): The Dynamics of Collective Leadership
and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations, in: Academy of Management Jour
nal, 44 (4), pp. 809-837.
Dequech, D. (2001): Bounded Rationality, Institutions, and Uncertainty, in: Journal of
Economic Issues, 35 (4), pp. 911-929.
DeSarbo, W. S./Di Benedetto, C. AJSong, M./Sinha, L (2005): Revisiting the Miles
and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic
Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance, in: Strategic
Management Journal, 26 (1), pp. 47-74.
Diamantopoulos, A./Winklhofer, H. M. (2001): Index Construction with Formative In
dicators: An Alternative to Scale Development, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 38
(2), pp. 269-277.
Dierickx, I./Cool, K. (1989): Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competi
tive Advantage, in: Management Science, 35 (12), pp. 1504-1511.
Djelic, M.-LJAinamo, A. (1999): The Coevolution of New Organizational Forms in the
Fashion Industry: A Historical and Comparative Study of France, Italy, and the United
States, in: Organization Science, 10 (5), pp. 622-637.
200 References
Donaldson^ L. (1996): The Normal Science of Structural Contingency Theory, in:
Clegg, S. R./Hardy, C./Nord, W. R. (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, Lon
don, pp. 57-76.
Dowling, G. R. (2004): Corporate Reputations: Should You Compete on Yours?, in:
California Management Review, 46 (3), pp. 19-36.
Dubin, R. (1978): Theory Development, New York.
Duguay, C. R./Landry, S./Pasin, F. (1997): From Mass Production to Flexible/Agile
Production, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17
(12), pp. 1183-1195.
Dutta, S./Narasimhan, O./Rajiv, S. (2005): Conceptualizing and Measuring Capabili
ties: Methodology and Empirical Application, in: Strategic Management Journal, 26
(3), pp. 277-285.
Dutton, J. E. (1986): Understanding Strategic Agenda Building and its Implications for
Managing Change, in: Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, August 1986, pp.
3-24.
Dutton, J. E./Ashford, S. J. (1993): Selling Issues to Top Management, in: Academy of
Management Review, 18 (3), pp. 397-438.
Dutton, J. E./Ashford, S. J./Lawrence, K. A./Miner-Rubino, K. (2002): Red Light,
Green Light: Making Sense of the Organizational Context for Issue Selling, in: Or
ganization Science, 13 (4), pp. 355-369.
Dutton, J. EJAshford, S. J./0'Neill, R. M./Lawrence, K. A. (2001): Moves That Matter:
Issue Selling and Organizational Change, in: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4),
pp. 716-736.
Dutton, J. E./Duncan, R. B. (1987): The Creation of Momentum for Change Through
the Process of Strategic Issue Diagnosis, in: Strategic Management Journal, 8 (3), pp.
279-295.
References 201
Dutton, J. E./Jackson, S. E. (1987): Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organiza
tional Action, in: Academy of Management Review, 12 (1), pp. 76-90.
Dyer, J. H./Singh, H. (1998): The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources
of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage, in: Academy of Management Review,
23 (4), pp. 660-679.
Edwards, J. R. (2001): Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Re
search: An Integrative Analytical Framework, in: Organizational Research Methods, 4
(2), pp. 144-192.
Eisenhardt, K. M./Martin, J. A. (2000): Dynamic Capabilities: What are They?, in:
Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10-11), pp. 1105-1121.
Eisenhardt, K. M./Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990): Organizational Growth: Linking Found
ing Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures,
in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (3), pp. 504-529.
Encaoua, D./Geroski, P. A./Jacquemin, A. (1986): Strategic Competition and the Per
sistence of Dominant Firms: A Survey, in: Stiglitz, J. E./Mathewson, G. F. (Eds.), New
Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 55-86.
Erickson, G./Jacobson, R. (1992): Gaining Comparative Advantage Through Discre
tionary Expenditures: The Returns to R&D and Advertising, in: Management Science,
38 (9), pp. 1264-1279.
Fagerberg, J. (2005): Innovation: A Guide to the Literature, in: Fagerberg, J./Mowery,
D. C./Nelson, R. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York, pp. 1-26.
Fahy, J./Hooley, G. (2002): Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Electronic Busi
ness: Towards a Contingency Perspective on the Resource-based View, in: Journal of
Marketing, 10, pp. 241-253.
202 References
Faria, A./Fenn, P./Bruce, A. (2002): Determinants of Adoption of Flexible Production
Technologies: Evidence from Portuguese Manufacturing Industry, in: Economics of
Innovation & New Technology, 11 (6), pp. 569-580.
Farjoun, M. (1998): The Independent and Joint Effects of the Skill and Physical Bases
of Relatedness in Diversification, in: Strategic Management Journal, 19 (7), pp. 611-
630.
Ferdows, K./Lewis, M. AJMachuca, J. A. D. (2004): Rapid-Fire Fulfillment, in: Har
vard Business Review, 82 (11), pp. 104-110.
Flier, B.Nan den Bosch, F. A. J./Volberda, H. W. (2003): Co-evolution in Strategic
Renewal Behaviour of British, Dutch and French Financial Incumbents: Interaction of
Environmental Selection, Institutional Effects and Managerial Intentionality, in: Jour
nal of Management Studies, 40 (8), pp. 2163-2187.
Fombrun, C./Shanley, M. (1990): What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corpo
rate Strategy, in: Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2), pp. 233-258.
Forest, J./Mehier, C. (2001): John R. Commons and Herbert A. Simon on the Concept
of Rationality, in: Journal of Economic Issues, 35 (3), pp. 591-605.
Fornell, C./Bookstein, F. L (1982): Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and
PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 19
(4), pp. 440-452.
Fornell, C./Larcker, D. F. (1981): Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unob-
servable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics, in: Journal of Mar
keting Research, 18 (1), pp. 39-50.
Foss, N. J./Knudsen, C./Montgomery, C. A. (1995): An Exploration of Common
Ground: Integrating Evolutionary and Strategic Theories of the Firm, in: Montgomery,
C. A. (Ed.), Resource-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Toward a Synthe
sis, Boston, pp. 1-17.
References 203
Foss, N. J./Mahnke, V., Eds. (2000): Competence, Governance, and Entrepreneur ship,
Oxford.
Fox, K. A. (2001): Invisible Competition: Some Lessons Learned, in: Journal of Busi
ness Strategy, July/August 2001, pp. 36-38.
Fredrickson, J. W./Mitchell, T. R. (1984): Strategic Decision Processes: Comprehen
siveness and Performance in an Industry with an Unstable Environment, in: Academy
of Management Journal, 27 (2), pp. 399-423.
Freiling, J. (2001): Resource-based View und okonomische Theorie: Grundlagen und
Positionierung des Ressourcenansatzes, Wiesbaden.
Freiling, J. (2004): A Competence-based Theory of the Firm, in: Management Revue,
15(1), pp. 27-52.
Garg, V. K./Walters, B. A./Priem, R. L (2003): Chief Executive Scanning Emphases,
Environmental Dynamism, and Manufacturing Firm Performance, in: Strategic Man
agement Journal, 24 (8), pp. 725-744.
Geroski, P. A. (1999): Early Warning of New Rivals, in: Sloan Management Review,
Spring 1999, 40 (3), pp. 107-116.
Gersick, C. /. G. (1994): Pacing Strategic Change: The Case of a New Venture, in:
Academy of Management Journal, 37 (1), pp. 9-45.
Gotz, O./Liehr-Gobbers, K. (2004): Analyse von Strukturgleichungsmodellen mit Hil-
fe der Partial-Least-Squares(PLS)-Methode, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 64 (6), pp.
714-738.
Govindarajan, V./Fisher, J. (1990): Strategy, Control Systems, and Resource Sharing:
Effects on Business-Unit Performance, in: Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2),
pp. 259-285.
204 References
Grant, R. M. (1991): The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: ImpUca-
tions for Strategy Formulation, in: California Management Review, 33 (3), pp. 114-
135.
Grant, R. M. (1996): Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm, in: Strategic
Management Journal, 17 (Winter Special Issue), pp. 109-122.
Greenwood, R./Hinings, C. R. (1996): Understanding Radical Organizational Change:
Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism, in: Academy of Management
Review, 21 (4), pp. 1022-1054.
Gupta, A. K./Govindarajan, V. (1984): Business Unit Strategy, Managerial Character
istics, and Business Unit Effectiveness at Strategy Implementation, in: Academy of
Management Journal, 27 (1), pp. 25-41.
Hambrick, D. C. (1981): Specialization of Environmental Scanning Activities among
Upper Level Executives, in: Journal of Management Studies, 18 (3), pp. 299-320.
Hambrick, D. C. (1982): Environmental Scanning and Organizational Strategy, in:
Strategic Management Journal, 3 (2), pp. 159-174.
Hambrick, D. C. (1983): Some Tests of the Effectiveness of Miles and Snow's Strate
gic Types, in: Academy of Management Journal, 26 (1), pp. 5-26.
Hambrick, D. C./Geletkanycz, M. A./Fredrickson, J. W. (1993): Top Executive Com
mitment to the Status Quo: Some Tests of Its Determinants, in: Strategic Management
Journal, 14 (6), pp. 401-418.
Hamel, G./Prahalad, C. K. (1989): Strategic Intent, in: Harvard Business Review, 67
(3), pp. 63-78.
Hamel, G./Prahalad, C. K. (1992): Letter in Response to Stalk/Evans/Shulman (1992),
in: Harvard Business Review, May/June, 70 (3), pp. 164-165.
Hamel, G./Prahalad, C. K. (1993): Strategy as Stretch and Leverage, in: Harvard
Business Review, 71 (2), pp. 75-85.
References 205
Hamely G./Prahalad, C. K. (1994a): Competing for the Future, in: Harvard Business
Review, 72 (4), pp. 122-129.
Hamel, G./Prahalad, C. K. (1994b): Competing for the Future, Boston/Mass.
Hammond, J. H. (1993): Quick Response in Retail/Manufacturing Channels, in:
Hausman, J./Nolan, R. (Eds.), Globalization, Technology, and Competition, Boston,
pp. 185-214.
Hannan, M. T./Freeman, J. (1984): Structural Inertia and Organizational Change, in:
American Sociological Review, 49 (2), pp. 149-164.
Hannan, M. TJPolos, LJCarroll, G. R. (2003): The Fog of Change: Opacity and As
perity in Organizations, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (3), pp. 399-432.
Hansen, G. S./Wernerfelt, B. (1989): Determinants of Firm Performance: The Relative
Importance of Economic and Organizational Factors, in: Strategic Management Jour
nal, 10 (5), pp. 399-411.
Harrigan, K. R. (1984): Strategic Flexibility: A Management Guide for Changing
Times, Lexington, MA.
Harrington, R. J./Lemak, D. J./Reed, RJKendall, K. W. (2004): A Question of Fit: The
Links among Environment, Strategy Formulation, and Performance, in: Journal of
Business and Management, 10 (1), pp. 15-38.
Hayes, R. H/Wheelwright, S. C./Clark, K. B. (1988): Dynamic Manufacturing: Creat
ing the Learning Organization, New York.
Hedberg, B. (1981): How Organizations Learn and Unlearn, in: Nystrom, P.
C./Starbuck, W. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, New York, pp. 3-27.
Hedberg, B./Jonsson, S. (1977): Strategy Formulation as a Discontinuous Process, in:
International Studies of Management & Organisation, 7 (2), pp. 88-109.
206 References
Helfat, C. E./Peteraf, M. A. (2003): The Dynamic Resource-based View: Capability
Lifecycles, in: Strategic Management Journal, 24 (10), pp. 997-1010.
Hempel, C. G./Oppenheim, P. (1948): Studies in the Logic of Explanation, in: Phi
losophy of Science, 15 (2), pp. 135-175.
Henderson, A. D. (1999): Firm Strategy and Age Dependence: A Contingent View of
the Liabilities of Newness, Adolescence, and Obsolescence, in: Administrative Sci
ence Quarterly, 44 (2), pp. 281-314.
Henderson, R. M./Clark, K. (1990): Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of
Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms, in: Administra
tive Science Quarterly, 35 (1), pp. 9-30.
Henderson, R. M./Cockburn, I. M. (1994): Measuring Competence? Exploring Firm
Effects in Pharmaceutical Research, in: Strategic Management Journal, 15 (8), pp. 63-
84.
Henderson, R. M./Mitchell, W. (1997): The Interactions of Organizational and Com
petitive Influences on Strategy and Performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, 18
(SI), pp. 5-14.
Henri, J.-F. (2004): Organizational Culture and Performance Measurement Systems,
in: Accounting, Organizations and Society, Article in press, available online at
www.sciencedirect.com, pp. 1-27.
Hill, S. (1999): Women's Wear Makers Look Ahead to 2005, in: Apparel Industry
Magazine, November 1999, pp. 25-28.
Him, W. (2003): Mode zum Anfassen - Hennes & Mauritz: Die Modekette aus
Schweden ist zur Trendmaschine avanciert, in: Manager Magazin, Dezember 2003, pp.
74-80.
References 207
Hitt, M. A./Bierman, L./Shimizu, K./Kochhar, R. (2001): Direct and Moderating Ef
fects of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A
Resource-based Perspective, in: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1), pp. 13-28.
Hodgson, G. M. (1992): The Reconstruction of Economics: Is There Still a Place for
Neoclassical Economics?, in: Journal of Economic Issues, 26 (3), pp. 749-767.
Hoejfler, S./Keller, K. L. (2003): The Marketing Advantages of Strong Brands, in:
Journal of Brand Management, 10 (6), pp. 421-445.
Holbrook, D./Cohen, W. M./Hounshell, D. A./Klepper, S. (2000): The Nature, Sources,
and Consequences of Firm Differences in the Early History of the Semiconductor In
dustry, in: Strategic Management Journal, 21 (10-11), pp. 1017-1041.
Homburg, C./Workman Jr., J. P./Krohmer, H. (1999): Marketing's Influence Within
the Firm, in: Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), pp. 1-17.
Hrebiniak, L GJJoyce, W! F. (1985): Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and
Environmental Determinism, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 30 (3), pp. 336-
349.
Huber, G. P. (1991): Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the
Literatures, in: Organization science, 2 (1), pp. 88-115.
Hulland, J. (1999): Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Re
search: A Review of Four Recent Studies, in: Strategic Management Journal, 20 (4),
pp. 195-204.
Huy, Q. N./Mintzberg, H. (2003): The Rhythm of Change, in: MIT Sloan Management
Review, 44 (4), pp. 79-84.
Huygens, M./Baden-Fuller, C./van den Bosch, F. A. J./Volberda, H. W. (2001): Co-
evolution of Firm Capabilities and Industry Competition: Investigating the Music In
dustry, 1877-1997, in: Organization Studies, 22 (6), pp. 971-1011.
208 References
Iyer, A. V./Bergen, M. E. (1997): Quick Response in Manufacturer-Retailer Channels,
in: Management Science, 43 (4), pp. 559-570.
Jagersma, P. K. (2003): Innovate or Die, in: Journal of Business Strategy, Janu
ary/February 2003, pp. 25-28.
Jain, S. C. (1984): Environmental Scanning in U.S. Corporations, in: Long Range
Planning, 17 (2), pp. 117-128.
Jarvis, C. B./MacKenzie, S. B./Podsakoff, P. M. (2003): A Critical Review of Con
struct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Con
sumer Research, in: Journal of Consumer Research, 30, pp. 199-218.
Jaworski, B. JJKohli, A. K. (1993): Market Orientation: Antecedents and Conse
quences, in: Journal of Marketing, 57 (3), pp. 53-70.
Jennings, D. F./Lumpkin, J. R. (1992): Insights between Environmental Scanning Ac
tivities and Porter's Generic Strategies: An Empirical Analysis, in: Journal of Man
agement, 18 (4), pp. 791-803.
Jensen, M./Meckling, W. (1976): Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency
Costs, and Ownership Structure, in: Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), pp. 305-
360.
Johansson, J. K./Yip, G. S. (1994): Exploiting Globalization Potential: U.S. and Japa
nese Strategies, in: Strategic Management Journal, 15 (8), pp. 579-601.
Jordan, W. C./Graves, S. C. (1995): Principles on the Benefits of Manufacturing Proc
ess Flexibility, in: Management Science, 41 (4), pp. 577-594,
Joreskog, K. G./Sorbom, D. (1996): LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide, Lincolnwood,
IL.
Katila, RJShane, S. (2005): When Does Lack of Resources Make New Firms More
Innovative?, in: Academy of Management Journal, 48 (5), pp. 814-829.
References 209
Kelly, D./Amburgey, T. L. (1991): Organizational Inertia and Momentum: A Dynamic
Model of Strategic Change, in: Academy of Management Journal, 34 (3), pp. 591-612.
Kim, D. H. (2001): Organizing for Learning: Strategies for Knowledge Creation and
Enduring Change, Waltham.
Kim, E./Nam, D.-i./Stimpert, J. L (2004): The ApplicabiHty of Porter's Generic Strate
gies in the Digital Age: Assumptions, Conjectures, and Suggestions, in: Journal of
Management, 30 (5), pp. 569-589.
King, A. W./Zeithaml, C. P. (2001): Competencies and Firm Performance: Examining
the Causal Ambiguity Paradox, in: Strategic Management Journal, 22 (1), pp. 75-99.
King, A. W./Zeithaml, C. P. (2003): Measuring Organizational Knowledge: A Concep
tual and Methodological Framework, in: Strategic Management Journal, 24 (8), pp.
763-772.
Kleinbaum, D. G./Kupper, L. L./Muller, K. E./Nizam, A. (1997): Applied Regression
Analysis and Multivariable Methods, 3rd ed.. Pacific Grove, CA et al.
Ko, E./Kincade, D. H./Brown, J. R. (2000): Impact of Business Type upon the Adop
tion of Quick Response Technologies: The Apparel Industry Experience, in: Interna
tional Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20 (9), pp. 1093-1111.
Kogut, BJKulatilaka, N. (2001): Capabilities as Real Options, in: Organization Sci
ence, 12 (6), pp. 744-758.
Kogut, B./Zander, U. (1992): Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and
the Replication of Technology, in: Organization Science, 3 (3), pp. 383-397.
Konrad, L (1991): Strategische Friiherkennung - Fine kritische Analyse des "weak
signals"-Konzeptes, Bochum.
Kraatz, M. S./Zajac, E. J. (2001): How Organizational Resources Affect Strategic
Change and Performance in Turbulent Environments: Theory and Evidence, in: Or
ganization Science, 12 (5), pp. 632-657.
210 References
Kuhn, T. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago.
Lado, A. AJBoyd, N. G./Wright, P. (1992): A Competency-Based Model of Sustain
able Competitive Advantage: Toward a Conceptual Integration, in: Journal of Man
agement, 18(1), pp. 77-91.
Lajferty, B. A./Goldsmith, R. E. (1999): Corporate Credibility's Role in Consumers' At
titudes and Purchase Intentions When a High versus a Low Credibility Endorser Is
Used in the Ad, in: Journal of Business Research, 44, pp. 109-116.
Lajferty, B. A./Goldsmith, R. E. (2004): How Influential are Corporate Credibility and
Endorser Attractiveness When Innovators React to Advertisements for a New High-
Technology Product, in: Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (1), pp. 24-36.
Lam, A. (2005): Organizational Innovation, in: Fagerberg, J./Mowery, D. C./Nelson,
R. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York, pp. 115-147.
Lant, T. K./Milliken, F. J./Batra, B. (1992): The Role of Managerial Learning and In
terpretation in Strategic Persistence and Reorientation: An Empirical Exploration, in:
Strategic Management Journal, 13 (6), pp. 585-608.
Lau, C.-M./Woodman, R. W. (1995): Understanding Organizational Change: A Sche
matic Perspective, in: Academy of Management Journal, 38 (2), pp. 537-554.
Lawless, M. W./Finch, L K. (1989): Choice and Determinism: A Test of Hrebiniak
and Joyce's Framework on Strategy-Environment Fit, in: Strategic Management Jour
nal, 10 (4), pp. 351-365.
Lazerson, M. (1995): A New Phoenix?: Modem Putting-out in the Modena Knitwear
Industry, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (1), pp. 34-59.
Lee, D. Y./Tsang, E. W. K. (2001): The Effects of Entrepreneurial Personality, Back
ground and Network Activities on Venture Growth, in: Journal of Management Stud
ies, 38 (4), pp. 583-602.
References 211
Lee, J. (2003): Innovation and Strategic Divergence: An Empirical Study of the U.S.
Pharmaceutical Industry from 1920 to 1960, in: Management Science, 49 (2), pp. 143-
159.
Lei, D./Hitt, M. A./Bettis, R. (1996): Dynamic Core Competences Through Meta-
leaming and Strategic Context, in: Journal of Management, 22 (4), pp. 549-569.
Lei, D./Slocum Jr., J. W. (2005): Strategic and Organizational Requirements for Com
petitive Advantage, in: Academy of Management Executive, 19 (1), pp. 31-45.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992): Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Man
aging New Product Development, in: Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 13
(8), pp. 111-125.
Levinthal, D. A. (1991): Random Walks and Organizational Mortahty, in: Administra
tive Science Quarterly, 36 (3), pp. 397-420.
Lieberman, M. B./Montgomery, D. B. (1988): First-Mover Advantages, in: Strategic
Management Journal, 9, pp. 41-58.
Liebl, F. (1997): Strategische Friihaufklarung als LemprozeB: Ein Modell zur Unter-
stiitzung der Umfeldanalyse, in: Pfeiffer, R. (Ed.), Systemdenken und Globalisierung:
Folgerungen fiir die lernende Organisation im intemationalen Umfeld, Berlin, pp. 39-
59.
Liebl, F. (2000): Der Schock des Neuen: Entstehung und Management von Issues und
Trends, Miinchen.
Lippman, S. A./Rumelt, R. P. (1982): Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm
Differences in Efficiency under Competition, in: Bell Journal of Economics, 13 (2),
pp. 418-438.
Macdonald, S. (1995): Learning to Change: An Information Perspective on Learning
in the Organization, in: Organization Studies, 6 (5), pp. 557-568.
212 References
Mahoney, J. T. (2001): A Resource-based Theory of Sustainable Rents, in: Journal of
Management, 27 (6), pp. 651-660.
Mahoney, J. T./Pandian, J. R. (1992): The Resource-based View within the Conversa
tion of Strategic Management, in: Strategic Management Journal, 13 (5), pp. 363-380.
Maijoor, S.N an Witteloostuijn, A. (1996): An Empirical Test of the Resource-based
Theory: Strategic Regulation in the Dutch Audit Industry, in: Strategic Management
Journal, 17 (7), pp. 549-569.
Maitlis, S. (2005): The Social Processes of Organizational Sensemaking, in: Academy
of Management Journal, 48 (1), pp. 21-49.
Makadok, R. (2001): Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-based and Dynamic-
Capability Views of Rent Creation, in: Strategic Management Journal, 22 (5), pp. 387-
401.
Makhija, M. (2003): Comparing the Resource-based and Market-based Views of the
Firm: Empirical Evidence from Czech Privatization, in: Strategic Management Jour
nal, 24 (5), pp. 433-451.
Mansfield, E./Schwartz, M./Wagner, S. (1981): Imitation Costs and Patents: An Em
pirical Study, in: The Economic Journal, 91 (December 1981), pp. 907-918.
March, J. G./Shapira, Z. (1982): Behavioral Decision Theory and Organizational De
cision Theory, in: Ungson, G. R./Braunstein, D. N. (Eds.), Decision Making: An Inter
disciplinary Inquiry, Boston, pp. 95-122.
Markides, C. (1997): Strategic Innovation, in: Sloan Management Review, Spring
1997, pp. 9-23.
Markides, C. C./Geroski, P. A. (2005): Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass
Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets, San Francisco.
Markoczy, L. (2001): Consensus Formation during Strategic Change, in: Strategic
Management Journal, 22 (10-11), pp. 1013-1031.
References 213
Marlin, D./Hojfman, J. J./Lamont, B. T. (1994): Porter's Generic Strategies, Dynamic
Environments, and Performance: A Profile Deviation Fit Perspective, in: The Interna
tional Journal of Organizational Analysis, 2 (2), pp. 155-175.
Marshall, A. (1890): Principles of Economics, New York.
Mason, E. S. (1957): Economic Concentration and the Monopoly Problem, Cam
bridge, MA.
Mauri, A. J./Michaels, M. P. (1998): Firm and Industry Effects within Strategic Man
agement: An Empirical Examination, in: Strategic Management Journal, 19 (3), pp.
211-219.
May, R. C./Stewart, j . W. H./Sweo, R. (2000): Environmental Scanning Behavior in a
Transitional Economy: Evidence from Russia, in: Academy of Management Journal,
43 (3), pp. 403-427.
McCormick, A. (2005): Firefox Raises Share of Browser Market but Is still far behind
IE, in: New Media Age, 12/15/2005, pp. 15-15.
McEvily, S. K./Chakravarthy, B. S. (2002): The Persistence of Knowledge-based Ad
vantage: An Empirical Test for Product Performance and Technological Knowledge,
in: Strategic Management Journal, 23 (4), pp. 285-305.
McGrath, R. G./MacMillan, I. C.Nenkataraman, S. (1995): Defining and Developing
Competence: A Strategic Process Paradigm, in: Strategic Management Journal, 16 (4),
pp. 251-275.
McWilliams, A.Nan Fleet, D. D./Cory, K. D. (2002): Raising Rivals' Costs Through
Political Strategy: An Extension of the Resource-based Theory, in: Journal of Man
agement Studies, 39 (5), pp. 707-723.
Meagher, D. (2004): Brava Bravo, in: Australian Financial Review Magazine, 27 Au
gust 2004, pp. 60-61.
214 References
Mellewigt, T./Nothnagel, K. (2003): Customers as Strategic Resources in the Banking
Industry: A Resource-based Empirical Study, 65. Wissenschaftliche Jahrestagung des
Verbands der Hochschullehrer fiir Betriebswirtschaft, Zurich, Switzerland, June 10-13,
2003.
Meyer, A. D. (1991): What is Strategy's Distinctive Competence?, in: Journal of Man
agement, 17 (4), pp. 821-833.
Miles, R. E./Cameron, K. S. (1977): Coffin Nails and Corporate Strategies, Working
Paper No. 3, School of Organization and Management, Yale University.
Miles, R. E./Snow, C. C. (1978): Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process, New
York.
Miller, D. (1988): Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure:
Analysis and Performance Implications, in: Academy of Management Journal, 31 (2),
pp. 280-308.
Miller, D. (1993): The Architecture of Simplicity, in: Academy of Management Re
view, 18 (1), pp. 116-138.
Miller, D./Eisenstat, R./Foote, N. (2002): Strategy from the Inside Out: Building Ca
pability-Creating Organizations, in: California Management Review, 44 (3), pp. 37-54.
Miller, DJShamsie, J. (1996): The Resource-based View of the Firm in Two Environ
ments: The Hollywood Film Studios from 1936 to 1965, in: Academy of Management
Journal, 39 (3), pp. 519-543.
Miller, J. P. (1994): The Relationships Between Organizational Culture and Environ
mental Scanning: A Case Study, in: Library Trends, 43 (2), pp. 170-205.
Milliken, F. J. (1987): Three Types of Perceived Uncertainty About the Environment:
State, Effect, and Response Uncertainty, in: Academy of Management Review, 12 (1),
pp. 133-143.
References 215
Milliken, F. J./Lant, T. K. (1991): The Effect of an Organization's Recent Performance
History on Strategic Persistence and Change: The Role of Managerial Interpretations,
in: Shrivastava, P./Huff, A./Dutton, J. (Eds.), Advances in Strategic Management,
Greenwich, CT, pp. 129-156.
Mintzberg, H./Quinn, J. B. (1992): The Strategy Process: Concepts and Contexts,
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Mishina, Y./Pollock, T. G./Porac, J. F. (2004): Are More Resources Always Better for
Growth? Resource Stickiness in Market and Product Expansion, in: Strategic Man
agement Journal, 25 (12), pp. 1179-1197.
Mitchell, W. (1992): Are More Good Things Better, or Will Technical and Market Ca
pabilities Conflict When a Firm Expands?, in: Industrial & Corporate Change, 1 (2),
pp. 327-346.
Morgan, N. A./Kaleka, A./Katsikeas, C. S. (2004): Antecedents of Export Venture Per
formance: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Assessment, in: Journal of Marketing,
68(1), pp. 90-108.
Morrison, E. W./Milliken, F. J. (2000): Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change
and Development in a Pluralistic World, in: Academy of Management Review, 25 (4),
pp. 706-725.
Mosakowski, E. (1993): A Resource-based Perspective on the Dynamic Strategy-
Performance Relationship: An Empirical Examination of the Focus and Differentiation
Strategies in Entrepreneurial Firms, in: Journal of Management, 19 (4), pp. 819-839.
Murray, A. I. (1988): A Contingency View of Porter's "Generic Strategies", in: Acad
emy of Management Review, 13 (3), pp. 390-400.
Murray, J. Y./Chao, M. C. H. (2005): A Cross-Team Framework of International
Knowledge Acquisition on New Product Development Capabilities and New Product
Market Performance, in: Journal of International Marketing, 13 (3), pp. 54-78.
216 References
Nelson, R. R. (1991): Why Do Firms Differ, and how Does It Matter?, in: Strategic
Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 12, pp. 61-74.
Nelson, R. R./Winter, S. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cam
bridge, MA.
Noda, T./Collis, D. J. (2001): The Evolution of Intraindustry Firm Heterogeneity: In
sights from a Process Study, in: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), pp. 897-
925.
NyStrom, P. C./Starbuck, W. H. (1984): To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn, in:
Organizational Dynamics, 12 (4), pp. 53-65.
Ocasio, W. (1997): Towards an Attention-based View of the Firm, in: Strategic Man
agement Journal, 18, Summer Special Issue, pp. 187-206.
Oliver, C. (1997): Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and
Resource-based Views, in: Strategic Management Journal, 18 (9), pp. 697-713.
Ozawa, T. (2004): Veblen's Theories of "Latecomer Advantage" and "the Machine
Process": Relevancy for Flexible Production, in: Journal of Economic Issues, 38 (2),
pp. 379-388.
Park, D./Krishnan, H. A. (2003): Understanding the Stability-Change Paradox: In
sights from the Evolutionary, Adaptation, and Institutionalization Perspectives, in: In
ternational Journal of Management, 20 (3), pp. 265-270.
Pashigian, P. B. (1988): Demand Uncertainty and Sales: A Study of Fashion and
Markdown Pricing, in: American Economic Review, December 1988, pp. 936-53.
Pearson, C. M./Clair, J. A. (1998): Reframing Crisis Management, in: Academy of
Management Review, 23 (1), pp. 59-76.
Pennings, J. M. (1987): Structural Contingency Theory: A Multivariate Test, in: Or
ganization Studies, 8 (3), pp. 223-240.
References 217
Penrose, E. (1959): The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York.
Peteraf, M. A. (1993): The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based
View, in: Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), pp. 179-191.
Peteraf, M. A./Bergen, M. E. (2003): Scanning Dynamic Competitive Landscapes: A
Market-based and Resource-based Framework, in: Strategic Management Journal, 24
(10), pp. 1027-1041.
Pfeffer, J./Nowak, P. (1976): Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence,
in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (3), pp. 398-418.
Pianta, M. (2005): Innovation and Employment, in: Fagerberg, J./Mowery, D.
C/Nelson, R. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Innovation, New York, pp. 568-
598.
Picot, A. (1991): Okonomische Theorien der Organisation. Ein UberbUck iiber neuere
Ansatze und deren betriebswirtschaftliches Anwendungspotential, in: Ordelheide,
D./Rudolph, B. (Eds.), Okonomische Theorie der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Stuttgart,
pp. 143-170.
Piderit, S. K. (2000): Rethinking Resistence and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multi
dimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational Change, in: Academy of
Management Review, 25 (4), pp. 783-794.
Popper, K. R. (1967/1995): Das Rationalitatsprinzip, in: Popper, K. R./Miller, D.
(Eds.), Lesebuch: ausgewahlte Texte zu Erkenntnistheorie, Philosophic der Naturwis-
senschaften, Metaphysik, Sozialphilosophie, 2nd ed., Tubingen, pp. 350-359.
Porter, M. E. (1980a): Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and
Competitors, New York.
Porter, M. E. (1980b): Industry Structure and Competitive Strategy: Keys to Profit
ability, in: Financial Analysts Journal, July-August 1980, pp. 30-41.
218 References
Porter, M. E. (1985): Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Per
formance, New York.
Porter, M. E. (1991): Towards a Dynamic Theory of Strategy, in: Strategic Manage
ment Journal, 12 (8), pp. 95-117.
Porter, M. E. (1996): What is Strategy?, in: Harvard Business Review, November-
December 1996, pp. 61-78.
Powell, T. C./Lovallo, D./Caringal, C. (2006): Causal Ambiguity, Management Per
ception, and Firm Performance, in: Academy of Management Review, 31 (1), pp. 175-
196.
Prahalad, C. K./Bettis, R. A. (1986): The Dominant Logic: A New Linkage between
Diversity and Performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, 7 (5), pp. 485-501.
Prahalad, C. K./Hamel, G. (1990): The Core Competence of the Corporation, in: Har
vard Business Review, 68 (3), pp. 79-91.
Priem, R. LJButler, J. E. (2001): Is the Resource-based View a Useful Perspective for
Strategic Management Research?, in: Academy of Management Review, 26 (1), pp.
22-40.
Priem, R. L./Rasheed, A. M. A./Kotulic, A. G. (1995): Rationahty in Strategic Decision
Processes, Environmental Dynamism and Firm Performance, in: Journal of Manage
ment, 21 (5), pp. 913-929.
Rajagopalan, N./Spreitzer, G. M. (1996): Toward a Theory of Strategic Change: A
Multi-Lens Perspective and Integrative Framework, in: Academy of Management Re
view, 22 (1), pp. 48-79.
Reed, RJDeFillippi, R. J, (1990): Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sus
tainable Competitive Advantage, in: Academy of Management Review, 15 (1), pp. 88-
102.
References 219
Reinhardt, W. A. (1984): An Early Warning System for Strategic Planning, in: Society
for Long Range Planning, 17 (5), pp. 25-34.
Richard, O. C. (2000): Racial Diversity, Business Strategy, and Firm Performance: A
Resource-based View, in: Academy of Management Journal, 43 (2), pp. 164-177.
Rindova, V. P./Kotha, S. (2001): Continuous "Morphing": Competing Through Dy
namic Capabilities, Form, and Function, in: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (6),
pp. 1263-1280.
Ringle, C. M./Wende, S./Will, A. (2005): SmartPLS 2.0 (beta), http://www.smartpls.de.
University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Rivkin, J. W. (2000): Imitation of Complex Strategies, in: Management Science, 46
(6), pp. 824-844.
Rothaermel, F. T./Hill, C. W. L. (2005): Technological Discontinuities and Comple
mentary Assets: A Longitudinal Study of Industry and Firm Performance, in: Organi
zation Science, 16 (1), pp. 52-70.
Rouse, M. J./Daellenbach, U. S. (1999): Rethinking Research Methods for the Re
source-based Perspective: Isolating Sources of Sustainable Competitive Advantage, in:
Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5), pp. 487-494.
Rugman, A. M./Verbeke, A. (2002): Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based
view of strategic management, in: Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp. 769-780.
Rumelt, R. P. (1984): Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm, in: Lamb, R. B. (Ed.),
Competitive Strategic Management, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 556-570.
Rumelt, R. P. (1991): How Much Does Industry Matter?, in: Strategic Management
Journal, 12 (3), pp. 167-185.
Russo, M. V./Fouts, P. A. (1997): A Resource-based Perspective on Corporate Envi
ronmental Performance and Profitability, in: Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3),
pp. 534-559.
220 References
Samuels, W. J. (1995): The Present State of Institutional Economics, in: Cambridge
Journal of Economics, 19 (4), pp. 569-590.
Samuelson, P. A. (1948): Economics: An Introductory Analysis, New York.
Sanchez, R. (1995): Strategic Flexibility in Product Competition, in: Strategic Man
agement Journal, 16 (5), pp. 135-159.
Sanchez, R. (1997): Preparing for an Uncertain Future: Managing Organizations for
Strategic Flexibility, in: International Studies of Management & Organisation, 27 (2),
pp. 71-94.
Sanchez, R./Heene, A. (2004): The New Strategic Management: Organization, Compe
tition, and Competence, New York.
Sanchez, R./Heene, A./Thomas, H., Eds. (1996a): Dynamics of Competence-based
Competition: Theory and Practice in the New Strategic Management, Oxford, New
York.
Sanchez, R./Heene, A./Thomas, H. (1996b): Towards the Theory and Practice of Com
petence-based Competition, in: Sanchez, R./Heene, A./Thomas, H. (Eds.), Dynamics
of Competence-based Competition, Oxford, pp. 1-35.
Schermelleh-Engel, K./Moosbrugger, H./Muller, H. (2003): Evaluating the Fit of
Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit
Measures, in: Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8 (2), pp. 23-74.
Schmalensee, R. (1985): Do Markets Differ Much?, in: American Economic Review,
75 (3), pp. 341-351.
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1990): Strategy, Complexity and Economic Rent, in: Manage
ment Science, 36 (10), pp. 1178-1192.
Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1997): Disciplined Imagination: From Scenarios to Strategic
Options, in: International Studies of Management & Organisation, 27 (2), pp. 43-70.
References 221
Scholderer, J./Balderjahn, I. (2005): PLS versus LISREL: Ein Methodenvergleich, in:
Bliemel, F. et al. (Eds.), Handbuch PLS-Pfadmodellierung: Methode, Anwendung,
Praxisbeispiele, Stuttgart, pp. 87-98.
Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981): Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions
Hidden within the Language of Contingency "Theory", in: Administrative Science
Quarterly, 26 (3), pp. 349-377.
Scott, W. R./Meyer, J. W. (1994): Institutional Environments and Organizations: Struc
tural Complexity and Individualism, Thousand Oaks et al.
Sebenius, J. K. (2002): Negotiating Lessons from the Browser Wars, in: MIT Sloan
Management Review, 43 (4), pp. 43-50.
Selznick, P. (1957): Leadership in Administration, New York.
Seth, A./Thomas, H. (1994): Theories of the Firm: Implications for Strategy Research,
in: Journal of Management Studies, 31 (2), pp. 165-191.
Sharma, S./Mahajan, V. (1980): Early Warning Indicators of Business Failure, in:
Journal of Marketing, Fall 1980, 44 (4), pp. 80-89.
Sheremata, W. A. (2004): Competing Through Innovation in Network Markets: Strate
gies for Challengers, in: Academy of Management Review, 29 (3), pp. 359-377.
Siggelkow, N. (2001): Change in the Presence of Fit: The Rise, the Fall, and the Ren
aissance of Liz Claiborne, in: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), pp. 838-857.
Silverman, B. S. (1999): Technological Resources and the Direction of Corporate Di
versification: Toward an Integration of the Resource-based View and Transaction Cost
Economics, in: Management Science, 45 (8), pp. 1109-1124.
Simon, H. A. (1999): Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning, in: Reflec
tions, 1 (2), pp. 17-25.
222 References
Sood, A./Tellis, G. J. (2005): Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation, in:
Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), pp. 152-168.
Sorescu, A. B./Chandy, R. K./Prabhu, J. C. (2003): Sources and Financial Conse
quences of Radical Innovation: Insights from Pharmaceuticals, in: Journal of Market
ing, 67 (4), pp. 82-102.
Spanos, Y. EJLioukas, S. (2001): An Examination into the Causal Logic of Rent Gen
eration: Contrasting Porter's Competitive Strategy Framework and the Resource-based
Perspective, in: Strategic Management Journal, 22 (10), pp. 907-934.
Sproles, G. 5. (1981): Analyzing Fashion Life Cycles - Principles and Perspectives, in:
Journal of Marketing, 45 (Fall 1981), pp. 116-124.
Stalk, G./Evans, P./Shulman, L. E. (1992): Competing on Capabilities: The New Rules
of Corporate Strategy, in: Harvard Business Review, March/April, 70 (2), pp. 57-69.
Statistisches Bundesamt (2004): GENESIS Online: Das statistische Informationssys-
tem, https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online/Online, October 11, 2004
Stigler, G. J. (1968): The Organization of Industry, Homewood, 111.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965): Social Structure and Organizations, in: March, J. G. (Ed.),
Handbook of Organizations, Chicago, pp. 142-193.
Stuart, T. E. (1998): Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investiga
tion of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry, in: Administra
tive Science Quarterly, 43 (3), pp. 668-698.
Sutcliffe, K. M. (1994): What Executives Notice: Accurate Perceptions in Top Man
agement Teams, in: Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5), pp. 1360-1378.
Swamidass, P. M./Newell, W. T. (1987): Manufacturing Strategy, Environmental Un
certainty and Performance: A Path Analytic Model, in: Management Science, 33 (4),
pp. 509-524.
References 223
Tallman, S./Fladmoe-Lindquist, K. (2002): Internationalization, Globalization, and
Capabilities-based Strategy, in: California Management Review, 45 (1), pp. 116-135.
Tallman, S./Jenkins, M./Henry, N./Pinch, S. (2004): Knowledge, Clusters, and Com
petitive Advantage, in: Academy of Management Review, 29 (2), pp. 258-271.
Teece, D./Pisano, G./Shuen, A. (1990): Firm Capabilities, Resources, and the Concept
of Strategy, CCC Working Paper No. 90-8, Berkeley: University of California.
Teece, D. J. (1993): The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred
Chandler's Scale and Scope, in: Journal of Economic Literature, 31 (1), pp. 199-225.
Teece, D. J./Pisano, G./Shuen, A. (1997): Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Man
agement, in: Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), pp. 509-533.
Tenenhaus, M./Vinzi, V. E./Chatelin, Y.-M./Lauro, C. (2005): PLS Path Modeling, in:
Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48 (1), pp. 159-205.
Tetenbaum, T. J. (1999): Beating the Odds of Merger & Acquisition Failure: Seven
Key Practices That Improve the Chance for Expected Integration and Synergies, in:
Organizational Dynamics, 28 (2), pp. 22-35.
Thomas, H./Pollock, T. (1999): From I-O Economics' S-C-P Paradigm Through Stra
tegic Groups to Competence-based Competition: Reflections on the Puzzle of Com
petitive Strategies, in: British Journal of Management, 10 (2), pp. 127-140.
Thomas III, L G. (2004): Are We All Global Now? Local vs. Foreign Sources of
Corporate Competence: The Case of the Japanese Pharmaceutical Industry, in: Strate
gic Management Journal, 25 (8/9), pp. 865-886.
Thomas, J. B./Clark, S. M./Gioia, D. A. (1993): Strategic Sensemaking and Organiza
tional Performance: Linkages among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes,
in: Academy of Management Journal, 36 (2), pp. 239-270.
224 References
Thomas, K. W./Tymon, W. G., Jr. (1982): Necessary Properties of Relevant Research:
Lessons from Recent Criticisms of the Organizational Sciences, in: Academy of Man
agement Review, 7 (3), pp. 345-352.
Thornhill, S./Amit, R. (2003): Learning about Failure: Bankruptcy, Firm Age, and the
Resource-based View, in: Organization Science, 14 (5), pp. 497-509.
Tiffany & Co. (2006): History & Timeline, http://www.tiffany.com/about/timeline.asp,
January 27, 2006
Tsang, E. W. K. (2000): Transaction Cost and Resource-based Explanations of Joint
Ventures: A Comparison and Synthesis, in: Organization Studies, 21 (1), pp. 215-242.
Tucking, E. (1999): Die deutsche Bekleidungsindustrie im Zeitalter der GlobaHs-
ierung: eine Marktanalyse unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung auBenwirtschaftlicher
Rahmenbedingungen, Miinster (also: Dissertation, Universitat Miinster, 1998).
Tung, R. L. (1979): Dimensions of Organizational Environments: An Exploratory
Study of Their Impact on Organization Structure, in: Academy of Management Jour
nal, 22 (4), pp. 672-693.
Tyler, B. B./Bettenhausen, K. L./Daft, R. L. (1989): The Use of Low and High Rich In
formation Sources and Communication Channels in Developing and Implementing
Competitive Business Strategy, in: Academy of Management Proceedings, 1989, pp.
245-249.
Ulrich, H. (1994): Reflexionen iiber Wandel und Management, in: Gomez, P. et al.
(Eds.), Unternehmerischer Wandel: Konzepte zur organisatorischen Emeuerung,
Wiesbaden, pp. 5-30.
Van den Berg, J. C. J. M./Stagl, S. (2003): Coevolution of Economic Behaviour and
Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Change, in: Journal of Evolutionary
Economics, 13 (3), pp. 289-317.
References 225
Venkatraman, N./Ramanujam, V. (1987): Measurement of Business Economic Per
formance: An Examination of Method Convergence, in: Journal of Management, 13
(1), pp. 109-122.
Verona, G. (1999): A Resource-based View of Product Development, in: Academy of
Management Review, 24 (1), pp. 132-142.
Viswanathan, M./Sudman, SJJohnson, M. (2004): Maximum versus Meaningful Dis
crimination in Scale Response: Implications for Validity of Measurement of Consumer
Perceptions about Products, in: Journal of Business Research, 57 (2), pp. 108-124.
Volberda, H. W. (1996): Toward the Flexible Form: How to Remain Vital in Hyper-
competitive Environments, in: Organization Science, 7 (4), pp. 359-374.
Volberda, H. W. (1998): Building the Flexible Firm: How to Remain Competitive, Ox
ford et al.
Von Krogh, G./Roos, J. (1995): A Perspective on Knowledge, Competence and Strat
egy, in: Personnel Review, 24 (3), pp. 56-76.
Von Tunzelmann, N./Acha, V. (2005): Innovation in "Low-Tech" Industries, in: Fager-
berg, J./Mowery, D. C./Nelson, R. R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation,
New York, pp. 407-432.
Walker, O. C. J./Boyd, H. W. J./Mullins, JJLarreche, J.-C. (2003): Marketing Strat
egy: Planning and Implementation, 4th ed., Homewood, IL.
Weick, K. E. (1982): Management of Organizational Change Among Loosely Coupled
Elements, in: Goodman, P. S./Associates (Eds.), Change in Organizations: New Per
spectives in Theory, Research, and Practice, San Francisco, pp. 375-408.
Weick, K. EJSutclijfe, K. M./Obstfeld, D. (2005): Organizing and the Process of Sen-
semaking, in: Organization Science, 16 (4), pp. 409-421.
Weigelt, K./Camerer, C. (1988): Reputation and Corporate Strategy: A Review of Re
cent Theory and Applications, in: Strategic Management Journal, 9 (5), pp. 443-454.
226 References
Weiguny, B. (2005): Wie klaut man schneller als andere? Ein spanischer Konzem ko-
piert Internationale Designermode am erfolgreichsten, Die Zeit, http://www.zeit.de/
2005/40/Mode_2fZARA, February 2, 2006
Wernerfelt, B. (1984): A Resource-based View of the Firm, in: Strategic Management
Journal, 5 (2), pp. 171-180.
Wernerfelt, B. (1995): The Resource-based View of the Firm: Ten Years After, in:
Strategic Management Journal, 16 (3), pp. 171-174.
Wernerfelt, B. (2005): Product Development Resources and the Scope of the Firm, in:
Journal of Marketing, 69 (2), pp. 15-23.
Whetten, D. A. (1989): What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?, in: Academy of
Management Review, 14 (4), pp. 490-495.
Williamson, O. E. (1985): The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York.
Williamson, O. E. (2000): The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking
Ahead, in: Journal of Economic Literature, 38 (3), pp. 595-613.
Wold, H. (1985): Systems Analysis by Partial Least Squares, in: Nijkamp, P./Leitner,
H./Wrigley, N. (Eds.), Measuring the Unmeasurable, Boston, pp. 221-251.
WTO (2004): Statistics Database: Time Series Data, http://stat.wto.org/Statistical-
Program/WSDBViewData.aspx?Language=E, October 11, 2004
Wust, C. (2006): Klappdach mit Tucken, in: Der Spiegel, 2 (09.01.2006), pp. 160-161.
Yasai-Ardekani, M./Nystrom, P. C. (1996): Designs for Environmental Scanning Sys
tems: Tests of a Contingency Theory, in: Management Science, 42 (2), pp. 187-204.
Zajac, E. J./Kraatz, M. S./Bresser, R. K. F. (2000): Modeling the Dynamics of Strate
gic Fit: A Normative Approach to Strategic Change, in: Strategic Management Jour
nal, 21 (4), pp. 429-453.
References 227
Zajac, E. J./Shortell, S. M. (1989): Changing Generic Strategies: Likelihood, Direc
tion, and Performance Implications, in: Strategic Management Journal, 10 (5), pp. 413-
430.
Zander, U./Kogut, B. (1995): Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation
of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test, in: Organization Science, 6(1), pp.
76-92.