Post on 30-Dec-2015
description
transcript
A NEW OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY PREDICTION SYSTEM OVER ITALY
Maria Chiara Metallo1*, Attilio A. Poli2, Fabrizio De Fausti1, Luca Delle Monache3, Pierluca Di Giovandomenico1, Cristina Faricelli1, Margherita Moreno1, Alessandra Scifo1
1Environmental System Analysis srl, Bracciano, Rome, Italy2Take Air srl, Bracciano, Rome, Italy
3National Center for Atmospheric Research, Research Applications Laboratory, Boulder, CO
8th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 19-21, 2009
CONTACTS: Chiara Metallo (c.metallo@takeair.info), Luca Delle Monache (lucadm@ucar.edu)
Outline
• LaMiaAria modeling system• Nested domains• Model configurations• The Dust model• Emissions• Operational timelines• Preliminary Results• Future work
LaMiaAria Modeling System Structure
Nested Domains
Domain Coverage Spatial resolutionDomain1 Europe + North Africa 54 km (77 X 111)Domain2 intermediate 18 km (84 X 78)Domain3 Italy 6 km ( 177 X 213)
CMAQ CONFIGURATION
Current operational CMAQ forecast still uses static profile lateral boundary condition (LBC).
The initial conditions (IC) for CMAQ are set from the previous forecast cycle.
ADOPTED SCHEMES:
Yamartino global mass-conserving scheme to calculate horizontal and vertical
advectiondiffusion coefficient based on local wind deformation
calculate vertical diffusion using the Asymmetric Convective Model version 2
deactivate plume in grid model
2nd generation CMAQ aerosol deposition velocity routineRADM-based cloud processor that uses the asymmetric convective model to compute convective mixing
Aerosol module : the 3rd generation modal CMAQ aerosol model (AERO 3)
ADOPTED SCHEMES:
NCEP /GFS data
No grid analysis nudging
No observation nudging
Reisner mixed phase
Kain-fritsch cumulus parameterization (54 and 18 km grid)
MRF pbl (Troen and Mahrt, 1986)
Atmospheric radiation scheme: CLOUD (Dudhia)
Shallow convective scheme
Multi-layer soil model
MM5 CONFIGURATION
Nested DomainsD54 80 x 114D18 94 x 91D6 193 x 216Vertical Layers29 sigma pressure
THE DUST MODEL
S Erodibility factor (to reveal Hot Spots) [Ginoux, 2001]
T Tunable Factor
Am Bare soil fraction [Zender, 2003]
α = f(soil texture)= 100exp[(13.4 Mclay-6.0)ln10] Mobility Efficiency
Q = Q(u*,u*t) =const · u*t3 [1- (u*t/ u*)2] [1+ u*t/ u*] Horizontal Flux
u* = (/ ρ)1/2 Friction Velocity
u*t = f(D, Re*t, ρp ) · Fc Threshold Friction Velocity [Iversen & White, 1982]
F = α Q(u*, u*t) · Am · T · S
The algorithm used to assess surface dust flux is based on the Dust Entrainment and Deposition model (DEAD, Zender, 2002). The flux of dust, expressed in Kg/m2s, released in the atmosphere and than transported by CMAQ (in 2 bins fine/coarse fractioned following D’Almeida [1987] size distribution) is given by:
Saharan dust Outbreak over Sicily 15-16/05/09
For the 54 and 18 km grid, the contributions of the anthropogenic sources (road transport, non road transport, industry, agricultural sources, etc.) are implemented using the last available version of:
European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) emission database;
Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), excluded particulate matter, for north African areas;
European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER) for industrial point sources.
The spatial disaggregation is evaluated according to the methodology of the surrogate variables, using geographic data in a GIS platform (primary traffic, CORINE land cover by European Environment Agency) related to the emissions sources.
54 and 18 km GRID EMISSIONS
The inventory of emissions for the Italian national territory (6 km grid) is carried out using the National Emission Inventory provided by the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), available according to the CORINAIR classificationThe municipal spatial disaggregation is carried out from the emissive data on a provincial base according to the methodology of the proxy (or surrogate) variables.
6km GRID EMISSIONS
Operational Timelines
Preliminary results: hourly values50
40
30
20
10
0
PM10 Modeled (blue)VS
Observed (red) values
NO2 Modeled (blue)VS
Observed (red) values
O3 Modeled (blue)VS
Observed (red) values
O3 Modeled (blue)VS
Observed (red) values
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Ponzone (Al, 14 May 2009 ) for PM10, Cremona (15 June 2009) for NO2, Alessandria (20 June 2009) and Acqui Terme (8 May 2009) for O3.
µg/m3 µg/m3
µg/m3µg/m3
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Fractional Bias
Preliminary Results
(114 stations) (83 stations) (53 stations)
ResultsEuropean directive for modeling uncertainty
LM: European AQ Limit value (Target value for O3)EVA with values exceeding the regulatory target (50%) depicted in red
Scatter plots24-h Mean for PM10 in 53 stations. 24-h Max for O3 and NO2 in 83 and 114 stations respectively.
Analyzed Period: 1 July- 30 September Summer O3 daily-max modeled values are 96.4% inside the range ±30% and 86.7% inside ±20%
Results
AQ Forecast samples
High summer ozone in Italy
Tomorrow NO2 and O3 forecast
NO2 O3
Tomorrow SO2 and PM10 forecast
SO2 PM10
LaMiaAria web site: www.lamiaaria.it
Region maps
Future worksShort-term (1 year): * WRF *AERO4 *CB-V * Emission improvements road transport and natural sources Medium-term (1-3 years): * Postprocessing, i.e., bias correction (e.g., KF-based algorithm) * Global CTM BC Long-term (3-5 years): * Probabilistic prediction system based on ensemble data assimilation
A NEW OPERATIONAL AIR QUALITY PREDICTION SYSTEM OVER ITALY
Thank you for your attention
Luca Delle Monache (lucadm@ucar.edu)
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Research Applications Laboratory Boulder, CO
8th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 19-21, 2009
CONTACTS: Chiara Metallo (c.metallo@takeair.info), Luca Delle Monache (lucadm@ucar.edu)