Benjamin F. Hobbs Schad Professor of Environmental Management, Whiting School of Engineering

Post on 22-Mar-2016

31 views 1 download

Tags:

description

The Future Ain't What It Used to Be: What Variable Renewables Mean for Conventional Generation NY Association for Energy Economics August 23, 2012. Benjamin F. Hobbs Schad Professor of Environmental Management, Whiting School of Engineering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

E2SHI•

The Future Ain't What It Used to Be: What Variable Renewables Mean for

Conventional Generation

NY Association for Energy EconomicsAugust 23, 2012

Benjamin F. HobbsSchad Professor of Environmental Management, Whiting School of Engineering

Director, Environment, Energy, Sustainability & Health Institute (E2SHI)The Johns Hopkins University

Chair, Market Surveillance CommitteeCalifornia Independent System Operator

E2SHI•

Outline

I. Our goals: economy, environmentII. The challenge of variable output & pricesIII. Investment impactsIV. Why won’t the market provide needed

capacity? And how can it be fixed?

E2SHI•

A Lesson about Electricity

E2SHI•

1. Min cost / max net economic benefits

2. Min emissions & other environmental impacts

I. Fundamental Goals of Market Design

E2SHI•

K1. ?

• “a2. S

Source: Kay, 2011

Proxy Goals

• Maximizing proxies not same as maximizing fundamental efficiency & environmental objectives

E2SHI•

Renewable Portfolio Standard Policies, June 2012

29 states,+ Washington DC and 2 territories,have

Renewable Portfolio Standards

(8 states and 2 territories have

renewable portfolio goals).

Source; DSIRE, NCSU, www.dsireusa.org/summarymaps

E2SHI•

Outline

I. Our goals: economy, environmentII. The challenge of variable output & pricesIII. Investment impactsIV. Why won’t the market provide needed

capacity? And how can it be fixed?

E2SHI•

II. The Challenge of Variability:Dispatch Conventional Gen to Net Load

M. Rothleder, CAISO, Operational Flexibility Study Update, 6/22/2012 Market Surv. Comm. Mtg.

8

Load

& N

et L

oad

(MW

)

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

20,000

22,000

24,000

26,000

28,000

30,000

32,000

34,000

36,000

38,000

40,000

42,000

44,000

46,000

0:00 1:30 3:00 4:30 6:00 7:30 9:00 10:30 12:00 13:30 15:00 16:30 18:00 19:30 21:00 22:30 0:00

Load Net Load Wind Solar

Load, Wind & Solar Profiles – High Load Case, Jan. 2020

Win

d &

Sol

ar (M

W)

8,000 MW in 2 hours

6,300 MW in 2 hours

13,500 MW in 2 hours

E2SHI•

Can increase both costs and emissions• KU-Leuven stochastic unit commitment (De Jonghe, Hobbs, Belmans 2011):

■ Minimizing wind spill increases fuel costs & CO2 (relative to dispatch under 0 €/MWh wind bid)

• 17% reduction in spill possible• Per MWh of spill reduction:

0.71 t CO2 increase (+1.5% total CO2) 49 € cost increase (+1.3% total cost)

Example of Fundamental vs. Proxy Goals: Absolute Priority for Wind in Dispatch Makes

No Economic or Environmental Sense

E2SHI•

What’s Happened To Prices? Texas

David J. Maggio, ERCOT, Presentation IEEE PES, 7/2012

E2SHI•

What’s Happened to Prices? South Australia: 17% Wind

Cutler, Boerema, MacGill & Outhred, Energy Policy, 2011; I. MacGill, IEEE PES Mtg, 7/2012

• Revenue by gen type 47 $AU for wind 90 $AU for other

Load (MW) Duration Price ($/MW) Duration

Wind MW

Wind MW

E2SHI•

What Might Happen to Prices? CaliforniaCAISO 20% Penetration Study (2010)

Gas weekly MW generation

2012 Base Casevs.

20% Wind Case

Spring Energy Price Distribution

20% RPS 2.5% Lower Prices

Steam Gas CC Gas CT Gas0

10

20

30

40

% Revenue Loss under 20% RPS

Hour

E2SHI•

What Might Happen to Prices? NYISO2010 NYISO “Growing Wind” integration study

Price Duration Curve for 1275 and 8000 MW Wind Capacity(Superzones A-E)

E2SHI•

Why Revenues Diverge Among Gen Types

2000Net Load, MW

1000

timeFast 0 0 400 0 MWSlow 1000 1000 1600 2000 MWWind 600 500 200 100 MW LMP: 30 -10 70 30 $/MWh

• E.g., a system with two types of thermal generation: – 1000 MW of quick start peakers @ $70/MWh– 2100 MW of slow thermal @ $30/MWh; Max ramping = 600 MW/hr

• Morning ramp up and resulting generation:

W W

W W

Avg. Price Received$70$34.3$18.6

Spot prices reward flexibility!

E2SHI•

Outline

I. Our goals: economy, environmentII. The challenge of variable output & pricesIII. Investment impactsIV. Why won’t the market provide needed

capacity? And how can it be fixed?

E2SHI•

III. What do those Prices Imply for Long Run Generation Mix? The WECC Case

J. Bushnell, “Building Blocks: Investment in Renewable & Nonrenewable Technologies,” Iowa State U, 2010

Baseload CC Peakers

MW MW

E2SHI•

What do those Prices Imply for Long Run Generation Mix? The UK Case (15% Wind)R. Green & N. Vasilakos, Imperial College, The Long-Term Impact of Wind

Power on Electricity Prices and Generating Capacity

Wind

Peakers

CombinedCycle

Baseload

E2SHI•

CAISO: 33% Wind in 2020 Potentially 4,600MW of Upward Flexible Resources Needed (Hi-Load Scenario)

M. Rothleder, CAISO, Operational Flexibility Study Update, 6/22/2012 Market Surveillance Comm. Mtg.

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Trajectory, Environmental, Cost, Time Constraint Cases

(1-in-2 year load, 5,688 MW of incremental DR, 5,145 MW of

Energy Efficiency)

2020 LTPP Operational Case (10% (5,500 MW) Higher Load)

2020 LTPP Operational Case(3,173 MW Local Capacity

Resources)

2018 Sensitivity Risk of Retirement Case

Capa

city

(MW

)

Generic Upward Capacity Needs to Meet Observed A/S Load Following Shortages

Local Capacity Needs (Based on LCR Studies of OTC Retirement) System Neeeds

18

E2SHI•

Outline

I. Our goals: economy, environmentII. The challenge of variable output & pricesIII. Investment impactsIV. Why won’t the market provide needed

capacity? And how can it be fixed?

E2SHI•

IV. CAISO Needs It, But Are They Getting It?

www.calpine.com/power/plant.asp?plant=28

- Announced intent to retire new (2001) CC Plant (Sutter)

- Losing 11 GW of Once-Through Cooled Capacity?

E2SHI•

Why Doesn’t the CAISO Get Its Needed Capacity?

Spot Market Failures: Markets suppress price variability

Flexibility not rewarded- 5-15-60 minute averaging times- Risk disregarded in scheduling- Public/operator distaste for price spikes

Bid & price caps

“Missing Money”

E2SHI•

Fixes?I. Operational market fixes

- Shorter intervals- Ramp constraints/products in spot markets

- MISO- CAISO: Twice as costly as spin in Q2 2012

- Stochastic unit commitment/dispatch?

II. Capacity market fixes- Different flavors of capacity- Longer horizon & liquid capacity market

E2SHI•

New York: Monthly Capacity Market

S. Harvey, S. Pope, W. Hogan, Preliminary Evaluation of the New York ISO Capacity Market, New York ISO ICAP Working Group, 7/31/2012

E2SHI•

More thanenough capacity …..

PJM Capacity Market (RPM): Eliciting Capacity Investment from Surprising Sources

Brattle, Second Performance Assessment of PJM’s Reliability Pricing Model Market Results 2007/08 through 2014/15, Aug.2011

…At prices lower than “CONE”

E2SHI•

PJM RPM: Surprising Capacity SourcesBrattle, Second Performance Assessment of PJM’s Reliability Pricing Model Market Results 2007/08 through 2014/15, Aug.2011

GainsLosses

Target

E2SHI•

Conclusions

Variable net loads and prices • Lower margins from spot energy for

thermal generation

To get an economic & clean gen mix, more revenues needed from:

• Ancillary services E.g., CAISO flexiramp

• Capacity markets E.g., PJM RPM

E2SHI•

Questions?

bhobbs@jhu.eduE2SHI, The Johns Hopkins University