Post on 27-Mar-2015
transcript
by
Noise Performance MetricsA View on the Situation at Amsterdam Airport
Schiphol in 2003
M.E.S. VogelsNational Aerospace Laboratory NLR
Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Technical Interchange Meeting FAA- Eurocontrol15-17 May 2002, Toulouse, FranceAction Plans 2, 5, 6
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 2
Contents
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and its environment
Noise Target Setting (2003+)
Assessment Method
Example of Daily Performance Evaluation
Future years
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 4
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and Its Environment
New Runway
5 runways:480.000 in 2003 4 runways: 460.000 in 2002
Reduced noise load. Benefit!!!
Increased noise load.Not in populated area!!!
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 5
Noise control points for Lden Total Noise Volume
(virtual airport)
x
y
0 km
0
1
2
17151311973.5
Referentiepunten
Targets are set by noise loads computed for scenario 2005
Targets in noise control points include meteo-margin
Noise Target Setting (2003+)
Noise control points for Lnight
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 6
Noise Target Setting (2003+)
Reasons for changing the noise target setting:– distrust of general public in modelling, forcing a transition from
modelling towards measurements, hence a transition from a noise zone to a set of discrete control points
– non-incorporation of noise levels below 65 dB(A)– absurdities: environmental protection against high noise loads
on parking lots and beet fields– harmonisation in Europe towards Lden and Lnight, abandoning
Dutch Kosten Unit
Transition from the current noise zone system involves:– changes in law– environmental impact procedure– independent assessment of information
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 7
Assessment method
The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method
Procedures
Flight path
Timetable
Certification Noise Data
...
Noise Impact
Fleet
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 8
Assessment method
The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method
Procedures
Flight path
Timetable
Certification Noise Data
...
Noise Impact
Fleet
Actual
Modelled/Planned/Predicted
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 9
Assessment method
The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method
Procedures
Flight path
Timetable
Certification Noise Data
...
Noise Impact
Fleet
Actual
Modelled/Planned/Predicted
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 10
Assessment method
The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method
Procedures
Flight path
Timetable
Certification Noise Data
...
Noise Impact
Fleet
Actual
Modelled/Planned/Predicted
Also applicable to Validation of new procedures!!!
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 11
Assessment method
The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method
Procedures
Flight path
Timetable
Certification Noise Data
...
Noise Impact
Fleet
Actual
Modelled/Planned/Predicted
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 12
Assessment method
The assessment method for target setting, planning, monitoring, enforcement is identical, viz. calculation method
Procedures
Flight path
Timetable
Certification Noise Data
...
Noise Impact
Fleet
Actual
Modelled/Planned/Predicted
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 13
Nov-99
Dec-99
Jan-00
Feb-00
Mar-00
Apr-00
May-00
Jun-00
Jul-00
Aug-00
Sep-00
Oct-00
Zone Plan Margin Actual Expected
critical value
decrease
Maximum Plan Margin Actual Expected
Example of Daily Performance monitoring
M.E.S. Vogels, NLR, May 15, 2002 14
Future years...
The noise development in living areas in the 53 Lden contour of the transition scenario will be monitored.
From 2005+ noise measurements will be involved in target setting. Various options are being investigated.
Harmonisation policy in Europe will be integrated into national regulations