Post on 14-Jan-2015
description
transcript
CLINICAL SCREENING REPORTWEEK 43
Al-Ahli Saudi FC
GRAM MATHIEUCLINICAL SCREENING
Player 1
o Area at risk: Adductor muscleso Evolution: Ankle mobility maintained.
o Planned action: Continue follow-up by Coach Mathieu
Player 1
o Evolution: Overall slight increased hip adductor strength (HAS) and decreased pain perception.
o Planned action: Continue follow-up by Coach Mathieu
Player 2
o Area at risk: Iliopsoas and rectus femoris muscleo Evolution: Ankle mobility decreased in right ankle
o Planned action: Further assessment and treatment by Coach Mathieu
Player 2
o Evolution: Decreased hip adduction strength with increased pain on both sides.
o Planned action: Further assessment and treatment by Coach Mathieu
Player 6
o Area at risk: Back, Iliopsoas, rectus femoris, adductor muscles and left ankle
o Evolution: No change in ankle mobility
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
Player 6
o Evolution: Hip adduction strength increased . Pain remained.
o Planned action: Continue treatment/monitoring by Coach Mathieu
Player 3
o Area at risk: Lower back + right hamstrings (neurologic factor involved)
o Evolution: Maintained ankle mobility left, restored right
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
Player 3
o Evolution: Slight increase in hip adduction strength, major decrease to 0/10 in pain perception.
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
Player 4
o Area at risk: Lower back muscles, Iliopsoas, rectus femoris, Abd and Adductors + Body weight
o Evolution: Restored ankle mobility
Player 4
o Evolution: Increased hip adduction strength with decreased pain perception
o Planned action: Further assessment and treatment by Coach Mathieu
Player 5
o Area at risk: Lower back, rectus femoris and adductorso Evolution: Maintained ankle mobility
Player 5
o Evolution: Slightly fluctuating hip adduction strength. Pain score swings around 2-3. This is nothing to worry about.
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
Conclusion
Taken into account the limited data base, the following conclusions can be drawn:
o Following players need extra care:o Player – Neurological factor in right hamstring (Medical imaging
approval in process)o Player – R ankle + Adductorso Player– Adductor righto Player – Adductors
o Following players have decreased knee to wall measurements and need further joint mobility assessment to rule out possible arthrogenic problems:
o Player
Conclusion
o Following players have a positive evolution in their risk of groin area injuries:o Player o Player o Player
o Following players have a negative evolution in their risk of groin area injuries and should be monitored closely:o /
o Planned action: Further assessment by Coach Mathieu
Conclusion
In conclusion
o Football is a high maintenance sport o Frequent screening sessions allow the staff to create an
atmosphere in which the player is comfortable to mention all types of issues (biopsychosocial).
o This is often important information in order to adapt and monitor injury prevention sessions, secondary and tertiary prevention.
o This information is also of importance to the head coach and physical coach in order to individualize trainings.
In light of these conclusions I would advice to organize a weekly screening moment in order to profit maximally from it’s advantages