December 6, 2006 Council of Graduate Schools 1 Managing Graduate Attrition and Completion 46 th CGS...

Post on 27-Mar-2015

218 views 0 download

Tags:

transcript

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 1

Managing Graduate Attrition and Completion

46th CGS Annual MeetingPre-Meeting WorkshopDecember 6, 2006

Daniel Denecke, Director, Ph.D. Completion ProjectHelen Frasier, Program Manager, CGS Best PracticesKenneth Redd, Director, Research and Policy Analysis

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 2

Workshop Materials

Completion & Attrition Worksheet

Data Templates

CD of Project Templates: Data Templates Data Template Instructions Exit Surveys

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 3

Ph.D. Completion ProjectData Templates

Completion Data Attrition Data Aggregate Completion Data Factor Assessments Exit Survey Templates

Standard Short-form Online

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 4

Completion Templates(10-year and 7-year cohorts)

Entering student

academic year cohort*

Number of entering doctoral students

Number of students who left program

after receving master's degree

Number of students

admitted to PhD

candidacy**

3 years

[ ≤ 3Years ]

4 years

[ > 3 ≤ 4 Years ]

5 years

[ > 4 ≤ 5 Years ]

6 years

[ > 5 ≤ 6 Years ]

7 years

[ > 6 ≤ 7 Years ]

8 years

[ > 7 ≤ 8 Years ]

9 years

[ > 8 ≤ 9 Years ]

10 years

[ > 9 ≤ 10 Years ]

1992-93

1993-94

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-2000

2000-01

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

Totals

Of those admitted to PhD candidacy**:

Number who completed within given number of years after enrolling

Number who are still

enrolled after 10 years

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 5

Completion & Attrition Data- Data Verification

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 6

Attrition Template

After Enrollment

CohortCohort

Size

Wit

ho

ut

MA

Wit

h M

A -

wit

ho

ut

C

Wit

h C

an

did

ac

y

Tra

ns

fer

Ou

t

Sto

p O

ut

Ph

.D.

De

gre

e

Co

nti

nu

ing

Info

Un

kn

ow

n

Wit

ho

ut

MA

Wit

h M

A -

wit

ho

ut

C

Wit

h C

an

did

ac

y

Tra

ns

fer

Ou

t

Sto

p O

ut

Ph

.D.

De

gre

e

Co

nti

nu

ing

Info

Un

kn

ow

n

Wit

ho

ut

MA

Wit

h M

A -

wit

ho

ut

C

Wit

h C

an

did

ac

y

Tra

ns

fer

Ou

t

Sto

p O

ut

Ph

.D.

De

gre

e

Co

nti

nu

ing

Info

Un

kn

ow

n

Wit

ho

ut

MA

Wit

h M

A -

wit

ho

ut

C

Wit

h C

an

did

ac

y

Tra

ns

fer

Ou

t

Sto

p O

ut

Ph

.D.

De

gre

e

Co

nti

nu

ing

Info

Un

kn

ow

n

Wit

hd

rew

Tra

ns

fer

Ou

t

Sto

p O

ut

Ph

.D.

De

gre

e

Co

nti

nu

ing

Info

Un

kn

ow

n

92-93

93-94

94-95

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

Totals

Annual Total

Year 1 [ ≤ 1 Year ] Year 2 [ > 1 ≤ 2 Years ] Year 3 [ > 2 ≤ 3 ] Year 4 [ > 3 ≤ 4 ] Year 5 [ > 4 ≤ 5 ]

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 7

Completion & Attrition Data- Data Readiness

Data Readiness Challenges of the Completion and Attrition Templates Student Degree Objective Mastering out

With vs. Without Candidacy Transfers and Stop-outs

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 8

Attrition and Completion Management

Data Examples

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 9

Baseline Data:Summary of Cases

Data submitted by: 21 Research Partners, 8 Project Partners 316 Doctoral Programs represented in analysis Cohorts entering 1992-93 through 2003-04 academic

years Program-level data for more than 47,000 graduate

students Institution-level demographic data for 52,975 graduate

students

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 10

Definitions of “Discrete” Cohorts

10-Year Cohorts Students enrolling in 1992-93; 1993-94; 1994-95 828 cohorts (11,846 students)

7-Year Cohorts Students enrolling in 1995-96; 1996-97; 1997-98 897 cohorts (11,334 students)

4-Year Cohorts Students enrolling in 1998-99; 1999-2000; 2000-01 908 cohorts (11,795 students)

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 11

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 12

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 13

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 14

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 15

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 16

Demographic Completion Data

Forthcoming changes in Demographic Data

Collection

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 17

Student Exit Surveys- Descriptive Statistics

Engineering 13.8%

Life Sciences 19.4%

Math & Physical Sciences

19.1%

Social Sciences 24.3%

Humanities 21.8%

Did not specify 1.6%

Did not answer, 1.50%

Male, 55.80%

Female, 42.80%

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 18

Student Exit Surveys- Descriptive Statistics

White, 66.5%Asian American, 16.8%Black, 6.5%Hispanic, 3.1%American Indian/AK Native, 0.4%Other, 3.9%Did not answer, 2.7%

Spouse/Partner 60.0%

No Spouse 38.2%

Did not answer 1.8%

Dependents 27.0%

No Dependents 70.3%

Did not answer 2.7%

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 19

Student Exit Surveys- Identifying Key Completion Factors

Among COMPLETERS:

Financial Support 79.5%

Mentoring 63.0%

Family Support 59.8%

Program Quality 41.6%

Social Environment

38.9%

Other Factors 30.1%

Professional Guidance

29.6%

Among NON-COMPLETERS:

Other Factors 62.2%

Mentoring 40.5%

Financial Support 37.8%

Professional Guidance 35.1%

Program Quality 29.7%

Social Environment 29.7%

Family Support 27.0%

Program Requirements 18.9%

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 20

Student Exit Surveys- The Value & Role of Mentors

What were the most valuable things or tools you received from your mentor(s)?

Among Completers 86% - Research

Guidance 62% - Career

Guidance 46% - Teaching 14% - Other

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 21

Student Exit Surveys- The Value & Role of Mentors

Did you receive regular feedback from your advisor and/or program about your academic progress?

The Chi-2 test result suggests there is no statistically significant difference between broad fields

Did you have access to someone in your doctoral program that you consider a mentor, e.g. someone who advised you on academic and professional matters beyond your immediate research project(s)?

The Chi-2 test result suggests there is statistically significant (at 1% level) difference between broad fields

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 22

CGS Online Exit Surveys:Sample Survey Links

Standard length survey:https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=183051439540

“Short-form” survey:https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=76911383556

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 23

December 6, 2006Council of Graduate Schools

www.cgsnet.org 24

www.phdcompletion.org

phdcompletion@cgs.nche.edu

Daniel Denecke

ddenecke@cgs.nche.edu

Helen Frasier

hfrasier@cgs.nche.edu

Kenneth Redd

kredd@cgs.nche.edu