Post on 04-Feb-2020
transcript
Name of Scheme
5. Jenemarrung6. Pamukulu
T : Technical IrrigationST : Semi-Technical Irrigation
RegisteredArea (Ha)
1,0524,526
SubjectArea (Ha)
9754,480
Irrigation Scheme
STT
Location Map of Irrigation Schemesin Takalar District
LEGEND
Capital Town of District
Sub-District Town
District Boundary
Sub-District Boundary
Provincial Road
District Road
River
Irrigation Scheme
Technical Irrigation
Semi-Technical Irrigation
Location of District
N
SOUTH SULAWESIPROVINCE
CENTRALSULAWESI
SOUTHEASTSULAWESI
UJUNGPANDANG
PARE-PARE
The Study on Comprehensive Recovery Programof Irrigation Agriculture
Japan International Cooperation Agency
0 1 2 3 4
SCALE
5 Km6. Pamukulu
5. Jenemarrung
TAKALAR
Mangada
Calalang
JENEPONTODISTRICT
TAKALARDISTRICT
M a k a s s a r
S t r a i t s
GOWADISTRICT
South Sulawesi Province5. Jenemarung Scheme(1/4)
I.1 General(1) Code Number : 73050051 (7) Number of Farmers : 782(2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Jenemarrung (8) Water Resource River : Jenemarrung(3) District (Kabupaten) : Takalar (9) Catchment Area (km2) : 43.50(4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Polombangkeng Selatan (10) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1961/1975(5) Registered Area (ha) : 1,052(6) Technical Level : Semi Technical
I.2 Availability of Reports/Documents & References (A : Available, B : Available but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) b. Irrigation diagram c. As-built drawings
A Ae. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender
A -
II.1 Present and Planned Land Use
975 975 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
975 975 0
III.1 Present/Before Project Condition(1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production
AnnualPaddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others
975 975 100% 4.0 3,900200 200 21% 160
0 0%975 200 0 1,175 121% 4.0 3,900 160 0
(2) Problems and ConstraintsA. Irrigation & Agriculture Performances- No irrigation water supply in dry season- Only single cropping of paddy in wet season practiced; annual intensity low; paddy yield levels still low;B. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JICA Study - Irrigation & Drainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Limited bargaining power of farmers - Agronomic Issues: Damage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Limited bargaining power of farmers - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited
III.2 Development Plan(1) Development Approaches
- Expansion of irrigated area through rehabilitation- Double cropping of paddy in the entire scheme; productivity increase of paddy through further intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season II- Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs
(2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop ProductionAnnual
Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others975 975 100% 5.0 4,875975 975 100% 5.0 4,875
195 195 20% 2,5001,950 195 0 2,145 220% 5.0 9,750 2,500 0
975 -5 0 970 99% 1.0 5,850 2,340 0
IV.1 Existing Condition(1) Number a. Target; 10 b. Established; 10 c. Not yet; 0 Registered 0
Performance a. Developed; 0 b. Under developing; 10 c. Not yet; 0 Not yet registered 10
(2) Problems and ConstraintsOperation Maintenance Management
(3) Causes of Problems and Constraints- Less frequency of WUA internal meeting.
IV.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures
- Promotion of WUA federation.
(2) Development Plan- Management training.
Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field
Season Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
Season II (dry I)Season III (dry II)
Season I (wet)
Total/Annual
Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
Crop Production (ton)
Season I (wet)Season II (dry I)
Season III (dry II)Total/Annual
a. Irrigated paddy fieldb. Rainfed paddy fieldc. Upland Fieldd. Uncultivated Lande. Non-irrigableTotal
III. AGRICULTURE
Crop Production (ton)Season
Plan (ha) Increment (ha)Category Present (ha)
h. WUAs dataC A
II. SUBJECT AREA FOR REHABILITATION PLAN
I. PROJECT FUNDAMENTALS
a. Design Reports of Existing System(Full set) d. Structure lists & diagramA B
IV. WUAs
Annual Increment
3 - 17
South Sulawesi Province5. Jenemarung Scheme
(2/4)
V.1 Existing Condition(1) Overall Irrigation System : D (A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
Water Resources Facility : C Main Canal System : D Secondary Canal System : D On-farm : D(2) Water Resources Facilty
a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. Condition : Cb. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos.c. Length of weir : 45 m g. Settling basin : not providedd. Design intake discharge : 1.2 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information)
(3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection RoadCanal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m)
Main 634 0 634Secondary 1,977 7,143 9,120
(4) Major Problems and Constrains- Water Resources Facility
Crack or damage on weir crestInsufficient diversion water due to sedimentation in front of intakeInflow of bed loads into canal and decrease canal flow capacity
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureImpassable of inspection road along canalGeneral O&M problemsDifficulty on maintenance of earth canalDifficulty on O&M
(5) Causes of Major Problems and Constraints- Water Resources Facility
Collision of foreign materials against weir crest, low quality of concrete/masonrySedimentation in front of intakeNo provision of settling basin, no proper gate operation of intake during flood
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureImproper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canalNo kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenanceFallen down and collapse of side slope, water plants or weed at inside of canalNo provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken
V.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Problems
- Water Resources FacilityRepair of weir crest by cement/chemical grouting or filling concreteDredging or flushing of sediment, proper gate operation of headworks and intakeProvision of settling basin, proper gate operation of intake during flood
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureProvision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavementProvision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure nameProvision of concrete liningProvision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement
(2) Water Resources Facility Dam/Headworks body Intake, civil Intake, mechanicalSettling basin
(3) Irrigation Canal and Related Structure
MainSecondaryMainSecondary
(4) On-farm Development (Unit: ha)a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 975 d. Non-potential paddy field 0b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 0 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field 0c. Potential non-paddy field 0 975
(5) Rehabilitation Cost (Direct Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.)On-Farm Project CostDevelop. Facility per ha
2,777 11,815 1,181 1,999 1,260 19,032 19.5 (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, Develop.: Development)
VI.1 EIRR 20.7%
VI.2 Prioritization ScoringEvaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score
Utilization of Irrigation Potential 10.0 - Agricultural Productivity 20.0 - -Urgency 25.0 - Social Problem 15.0 -Sustainability 15.0 - Economic Impact 15.0 -
VI.3 Priority Group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province -
No rehabilitation00
00
(A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Notfunctioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
(A: Functioning well,B: Partially deteriorated,C: Not functioning well,D: Serious condition foroperation)
DD
: minor rehabilitation: replacement or new
021,824
Works
: minor rehabilitation
New construction
IrrigationSystem
VI. PROJECT EVALUATION
Irrigation Drainage TotalW.R.F
7
221
00
: replacement or new
Total
282
10,944
21
63Rehabilitation
6349,120
Group VI: Development by other category(Subject area is less than 1,000 ha)
V. IRRIGATION FACILITY
Inspection road (m)
Canal (m)
Structure(nos)
697Total
ConditionStructure (nos)
3 - 18
South Sulawesi Province5. Jenemarung Scheme(3/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Headworks)
StructureFixed Weir
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Headworks)
StructureFixed Weir
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Main Canal)
StructureMasonry Lined Canal
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
Year of Construction
Crack or damage on weir crest; settlement of weir body;deflection of pier of weir
D
1961/75
A B C
Technical Level
TakalarJenemarrung
1,052 haSemi-technical
District
Registered Area
Scheme
DA B C
Sedimentation; crack or damage on lined canal; collapseof canal; leakage from lined canal; deflection of liningtoward inside of canal; no inspection road.
Crack or damage on weir crest; settlement of weir body;sedimentation.
A B C D
SS.10.124
SS.10.122
SS.10.125
3 - 19
South Sulawesi Province5. Jenemarung Scheme
(4/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Main Canal)
StructureCheck Structure
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, On-Farm
ActivityLand Preparation by Hand Tractor
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, On-Farm
ActivitySecondary Crop Cultivation
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads.
A B C
1,052 ha Year of Construction
D
C D
Lower function of check structure due to sedimentationin front of strcuture; damage of structure; physicaloperation problem on structure; deterioration of gate.
D
Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads.
C
Takalar
Technical Level Registered Area
Scheme Jenemarrung District
1961/75Semi-technical
A B
A B
SS.10.117
3 - 20
South Sulawesi Province6. Pamukulu Scheme(1/4)
I.1 General(1) Code Number : 73050051 (7) Number of Farmers : 3,996(2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Pamukulu (8) Water Resource River : Pamukulu(3) District (Kabupaten) : Takalar (9) Catchment Area (km2) : 110(4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Palang Bangky Utara (10) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1985(5) Registered Area (ha) : 4,526(6) Technical Level : Technical
I.2 Availability of Reports/Documents & References (A : Available, B : Available but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) b. Irrigation diagram c. As-built drawings
A Ae. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender
A 40
II.1 Present and Planned Land Use
4,133 4,480 347347 0 -3470 0 00 0 00 0 04,480 4,480 0
III.1 Present/Before Project Condition(1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production
AnnualPaddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others
4,133 4,133 100% 4.0 17,4001,332 223 1,555 38% 4.0 5,328 731
05,465 223 0 5,688 138% 4.0 22,728 731 0
1/: Irrigated & rainfed paddy & palawija(2) Problems and Constraints
A. Irrigation & Agriculture Performances- Irrigation water supply at on-farm level limited in dry season; existing of rainfed paddy field (347ha)- Double cropping of paddy still limited; paddy yield levels still low; palawija introduced to some extentB. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JICA Study - Irrigation & Drainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Low marketing prices - Agronomic Issues: Damage caused by rat - Farmers Organizations: Economic activities are limited - Paddy Marketing Low marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited
III.2 Development Plan(1) Development Approaches
- Expansion of irrigated area & ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation & upgrading- Expansion of double cropped area of paddy; productivity increase of paddy through intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season I- Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs
(2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop ProductionAnnual
Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others4,480 4,480 100% 4.0 17,9203,584 896 4,480 100% 5.5 19,712 2,778
0 0%8,064 896 0 8,960 200% 5.2 37,632 2,778 02,599 673 0 3,272 62% 1.2 14,904 2,047 0
IV.1 Existing Condition(1) Number a. Target; 36 b. Established; 35 c. Not yet; 1 Registered 0
Performance a. Developed; 0 b. Under developing; 33 c. Not yet; 2 Not yet registered 35
(2) Problems and ConstraintsOperation Maintenance Management
(3) Causes of Problems and Constraints- No available irrigation water in dry season.
IV.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures
- Acceleration of WUA establishment and federation
(2) Development Plan- WUA activity empowerment training.
Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field
Season Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
Season II (dry I)Season III (dry II)
Season I (wet)
Total/Annual
Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
Crop Production (ton)
Season I (wet)Season II (dry I)
Season III (dry II)Total/Annual
a. Irrigated paddy fieldb. Rainfed paddy fieldc. Upland Fieldd. Uncultivated Lande. Non-irrigableTotal
III. AGRICULTURE
Crop Production (ton) 1/Season
Plan (ha) Increment (ha)Category Present (ha)
h. WUAs dataC A
II. SUBJECT AREA FOR REHABILITATION PLAN
I. PROJECT FUNDAMENTALS
a. Design Reports of Existing System(Full set) d. Structure lists & diagramA B
IV. WUAs
Annual Increment
3 - 21
South Sulawesi Province6. Pamukulu Scheme
(2/4)
V.1 Existing Condition(1) Overall Irrigation System : C (A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
Water Resources Facility : C Main Canal System : C Secondary Canal System : D On-farm : C(2) Water Resources Facilty
a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. Condition : Cb. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 2 nos.c. Length of weir : 30 m g. Settling basin : not providedd. Design intake discharge : 7.0 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information)
(3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection RoadCanal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m)
Main 7,509 9,790 17,299Secondary 15,292 21,539 36,831
(4) Major Problems and Constrains- Water Resources Facility
Physical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworksPhysical operational problem on intake gate(s)Difficulty on O&M
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureSedimentation or obstruction of water flowDifficulty on maintenance of earth canalClogging of barrel of cross drainDifficulty on O&M
(5) Causes of Major Problems and Constraints- Water Resources Facility
Improper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leafImproper design, installation and/or maintenance of intake gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leafNo provision of inspection/access road, no provision of inspection bridge/deck
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureNo provision of settling basin(sediments), improper management of canal (sediments, water plant) Fallen down and collapse of side slope, water plants or weed at inside of canalImproper regular maintenance, insufficient capacity of barrel area against design discharge No provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken
V.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Problems
- Water Resources FacilityReplacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s)Replacement of intake gate(s)Provision of inspection/access road, inspection bridge/deck
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureRemoval of sediment soil and foreign materials from canal, grass cutting Provision of concrete liningRemoval of foreign materials from inside, or provision of screen, blow-off for maintenanceProvision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement
(2) Water Resources Facility Dam/Headworks body Intake, civil Intake, mechanicalSettling basin
(3) Irrigation Canal and Related Structure
MainSecondaryMainSecondary
(4) On-farm Development (Unit: ha)a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 4,133 d. Non-potential paddy field 0b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 347 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field 0c. Potential non-paddy field 0 4,480
(5) Rehabilitation Cost (Direct Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.)On-Farm Project CostDevelop. Facility per ha
4,343 74,428 7,443 9,362 1,570 97,146 21.7 (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, Develop.: Development)
VI.1 EIRR 13.7%
VI.2 Prioritization ScoringEvaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score
Utilization of Irrigation Potential 10.0 5.0 Agricultural Productivity 20.0 16.0 68.3Urgency 25.0 21.0 Social Problem 15.0 6.0Sustainability 15.0 8.3 Economic Impact 15.0 12.0
VI.3 Priority Group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province 16
No rehabilitation00
00
(A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Notfunctioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
(A: Functioning well,B: Partially deteriorated,C: Not functioning well,D: Serious condition foroperation)
CD
: minor rehabilitation: replacement or new
101010
Works
: minor rehabilitation
New construction
IrrigationSystem
VI. PROJECT EVALUATION
Irrigation Drainage TotalW.R.F
24
101121
17,29936,831
: replacement or new
Total
145111
36,831
121
0Rehabilitation
17,29936,831
Group II: Second priority group
V. IRRIGATION FACILITY
Inspection road (m)
Canal (m)
Structure(nos)
17,299Total
ConditionStructure (nos)
3 - 22
South Sulawesi Province6. Pamukulu Scheme(3/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Headworks)
StructureIntake
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Headworks)
StructureIntake Gate
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Main Canal)
StructureDivision Structure
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
Year of Construction
Leakage from gate leaf; insufficient strength againstdesign load due to rust, decay of steel material; problemon management due to lack of periodically maintenance
D
1985
A B C
Technical Level
TakalarPamukulu
4,526 haTechnical
District
Registered Area
Scheme
DA B C
Lower function of division structure due tosedimentation in front of structure; physical operationproblem on structure; deterioration of gate.
Leakage from gate leaf; insufficient strength againstdesign load due to rust, decay of steel material; problemon management due to lack of periodically maintenance
A B C D
3 - 23
South Sulawesi Province6. Pamukulu Scheme
(4/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Main Canal)
StructureDivision Structure
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, On-Farm
ActivityPaddy Cultivation
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, Agro-economy
ActivityFarmers' Group Shop
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
A B C
4,526 ha Year of Construction
D
C D
Lower function of division structure due tosedimentation in front of gates; physical operationproblem on structure.
D
Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads.
C
Takalar
Technical Level Registered Area
Scheme Pamukulu District
1985Technical
A B
A B
3 - 24
Bulupodo
Samataring
SINJAI
Dikeru
Manipi
Name of Scheme
7. Aparang I8. Aparang Hulu
ST : Semi-Technical Irrigation
RegisteredArea (Ha)
1,0491,094
SubjectArea (Ha)
1,0491,094
Irrigation Scheme
STST
Location Map of Irrigation Schemesin Sinjai District
LEGEND
Capital Town of District
Sub-District Town
District Boundary
Sub-District Boundary
Provincial Road
District Road
River
Irrigation Scheme
Semi-Technical Irrigation
Location of District
N
SOUTH SULAWESIPROVINCE
CENTRALSULAWESI
SOUTHEASTSULAWESI
UJUNGPANDANG
PARE-PARE
0 5
SCALE
10 Km
The Study on Comprehensive Recovery Programof Irrigation Agriculture
Japan International Cooperation Agency
8. Aparang Hulu
BONEDISTRICT
GOWADISTRICT
BULUKUMBADISTRICT
7. Aparang I
B o n e B a ySINJAIDISTRICT
South Sulawesi Province7. Aparang I Scheme(1/4)
I.1 General(1) Code Number : 73070121 (7) Number of Farmers : 1,587(2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Aparang 1 (8) Water Resource River : S. Aparang(3) District (Kabupaten) : Sinjai (9) Catchment Area (km2) : 62.0(4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Sinjai Selatan (10) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1975(5) Registered Area (ha) : 1,049(6) Technical Level : Semi Technical
I.2 Availability of Reports/Documents & References (A : Available, B : Available but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) b. Irrigation diagram c. As-built drawings
A Ae. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender
A 3
II.1 Present and Planned Land Use
1,049 1,049 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0
1,049 1,049 0
III.1 Present/Before Project Condition(1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production
AnnualPaddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others
1,049 1,049 100% 4.0 4,1961,048 1,048 100% 4.0 4,192
74 74 7% 522,097 74 0 2,171 207% 4.0 8,388 52 0
(2) Problems and ConstraintsA. Irrigation & Agriculture Performances- High irrigation performances attained; however water shortage in dry season reported- Double cropping of paddy practiced almost in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels still low; palawija introduced to some extentB. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JICA Study - Irrigation & Drainage: Water shortage at on-farm level in dry season - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - Agronomic Issues: Infestation of pest & diseases - Farmers Organizations: Most members are not active - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited
III.2 Development Plan(1) Development Approaches
- Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Productivity increase of paddy through intensification; expansion of palawija in dry season II- Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs
(2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop ProductionAnnual
Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others1,049 1,049 100% 5.0 5,2451,049 1,049 100% 5.0 5,245
420 420 40% 5042,098 420 0 2,518 240% 5.0 10,490 504 0
1 346 0 347 33% 1.0 2,102 452 0
IV.1 Existing Condition(1) Number a. Target; 8 b. Established; 8 c. Not yet; 0 Registered 0
Performance a. Developed; 0 b. Under developing; 8 c. Not yet; 0 Not yet registered 2
(2) Problems and ConstraintsOperation Maintenance Management
(3) Causes of Problems and Constraints- Less sense of responsibility for duties by O&M workers.
IV.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures
- Encouragement of WUA membership.
(2) Development Plan- Empowerment training.
Annual IncrementTotal/Annual
IV. WUAs
I. PROJECT FUNDAMENTALS
a. Design Reports of Existing System(Full set) d. Structure lists & diagramB B
h. WUAs dataC A
II. SUBJECT AREA FOR REHABILITATION PLAN
Plan (ha) Increment (ha)Category Present (ha)
e. Non-irrigableTotal
III. AGRICULTURE
Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field Crop Production (ton)Season Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
a. Irrigated paddy fieldb. Rainfed paddy fieldc. Upland Fieldd. Uncultivated Land
Season I (wet)
Total/Annual
Season II (dry I)Season III (dry II)
Crop Production (ton)
Season I (wet)Season II (dry I)
Season III (dry II)
Season Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
3 - 25
South Sulawesi Province7. Aparang I Scheme
(2/4)
V.1 Existing Condition(1) Overall Irrigation System : C (A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
Water Resources Facility : B Main Canal System : D Secondary Canal System : D On-farm : D(2) Water Resources Facilty
a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. Condition : Bb. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos.c. Length of weir : 46 m g. Settling basin : not providedd. Design intake discharge : 1.4 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information)
(3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection RoadCanal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m)
Main 3,542 250 3,792Secondary 2,650 5,548 8,198
(4) Major Problems and Constrains- Water Resources Facility
Settlement or breakdown of apron of weirPhysical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworksPhysical operational problem on intake gate(s)
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureImpassable of inspection road along canalDifficulty on maintenance of earth canalDifficulty on O&M
(5) Causes of Major Problems and Constraints- Water Resources Facility
Insufficient strength of weir foundation, not enough foundation treatment, or insufficient length of apronImproper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leafImproper design, installation and/or maintenance of intake gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureImproper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canalFallen down and collapse of side slope, water plants or weed at inside of canalNo provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken
V.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Problems
- Water Resources FacilityReconstruction of apron of weirReplacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s)Replacement of intake gate(s)
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureProvision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavementProvision of concrete liningProvision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement
(2) Water Resources Facility Dam/Headworks body Intake, civil Intake, mechanicalSettling basin
(3) Irrigation Canal and Related Structure
MainSecondaryMainSecondary
(4) On-farm Development (Unit: ha)a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 1,049 d. Non-potential paddy field 0b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 0 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field 0c. Potential non-paddy field 0 1,049
(5) Rehabilitation Cost (Direct Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.)On-Farm Project CostDevelop. Facility per ha
2,661 17,118 1,712 2,150 1,260 24,901 23.7 (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, Develop.: Development)
VI.1 EIRR 8.5%
VI.2 Prioritization ScoringEvaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score
Utilization of Irrigation Potential 10.0 5.0 Agricultural Productivity 20.0 11.0 65.5Urgency 25.0 21.0 Social Problem 15.0 10.5Sustainability 15.0 10.5 Economic Impact 15.0 7.5
VI.3 Priority Group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province 19
379
: replacement or new
Rehabilitation3,792
New construction
Total
00
7
Group III: Third priority group
108,198
289,838
: minor rehabilitation
2619
No rehabilitation4,171
Total
: minor rehabilitation
00
IrrigationSystem
VI. PROJECT EVALUATION
Irrigation Drainage TotalW.R.F
D
Structure (nos)8 0
0
Condition
19
V. IRRIGATION FACILITY
Inspection road (m)
Canal (m)
Structure(nos)
(A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Notfunctioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
: large rehabilitation
1,640
(A: Functioning well,B: Partially deteriorated,C: Not functioning well,D: Serious condition foroperation)
Works
D
3 - 26
South Sulawesi Province7. Aparang I Scheme(3/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Headworks)
StructureFixed Weir
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Main Canal)
StructureEarth Canal
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Main Canal)
StructureDivision Structure
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
Year of Construction
Crack or damage on weir crest; settlement of weir body;deflection of pier of weir
D
1975
A B C
Technical Level
SinjaiAparang I
1,049 haSemi-technical
District
Registered Area
Scheme
DA B C
Lower function of division structure due tosedimentation in front of gate; physical operationproblem on structure; deterioration of gates.
Sedimentation; collapse of canal; leakage from canal;difficulty on maintenance of earth canal; no inspectionroad.
A B C D
SS.12.31
SS.12.30b
SS.12.51a
3 - 27
South Sulawesi Province7. Aparang I Scheme
(4/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Secondary Canal)
StructureDivision Structure
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, On-Farm
ActivityPaddy Cultivation
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, On-Farm
ActivityLand Preparation by Hand Tractor
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads.
A B C
1,049 ha Year of Construction
D
C D
Lower function of division structure due tosedimentation in front of gate; physical operationproblem on structure; deterioration of gates.
D
Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads.
C
Sinjai
Technical Level Registered Area
Scheme Aparang I District
1975Semi-technical
A B
A B
SS.12.47b
3 - 28
South Sulawesi Province8. Aparang Hulu Scheme(1/4)
I.1 General(1) Code Number : 73070194 (7) Number of Farmers : 1,960(2) Name of Irrigation Scheme : Aparang Hulu (8) Water Resource River : S. Aparang(3) District (Kabupaten) : Sinjai (9) Catchment Area (km2) : 48.98(4) Sub-district (Kecamatan) : Sinjai Borong (10) Completion / Last Rehabilitation Year : 1985(5) Registered Area (ha) : 1,094(6) Technical Level : Semi Technical
I.2 Availability of Reports/Documents & References (A : Available, B : Available but partially, C : Not available/ No plan) b. Irrigation diagram c. As-built drawings
A Ae. Rehabilitation plan & its references f. Crops and yield data g. Cropping Calender
A 5
II.1 Present and Planned Land Use
941 1,048 1070 0 0
153 0 -1530 0 00 46 46
1,094 1,094 0
III.1 Present/Before Project Condition(1) Irrigation Performance and Crop Production
AnnualPaddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others
941 941 100% 4.0 3,764941 941 100% 4.0 3,764
0 0%1,882 0 0 1,882 200% 4.0 7,528 0 0
1/: Irrigated paddy & upland palawija(2) Problems and Constraints
A. Irrigation & Agriculture Performances- High irrigation performances attained; existing of upland field (153ha)- Double cropping of paddy practiced in the entire irrigated area; paddy yield levels still low; palawija not yet introducedB. Primary Constraint Identified through the Inventory Survey by the JICA Study - Irrigation & Drainage: Poor O&M at tertiary level and below - Palawija Marketing: Unstable marketing prices - Agronomic Issues: Farmers not following recommended practices - Farmers Organizations: No collaboration among KTs - Paddy Marketing Unstable marketing prices - Extension Services: Implementation of extension programs is limited
III.2 Development Plan(1) Development Approaches
- Ensuring year round irrigation water supply at on-farm level through rehabilitation - Productivity increase of paddy through intensification; introduction of palawija in dry season II- Strengthening of extension activities tailored to area specific needs; empowerment of farmer groups (KTs) to establish agri-business oriented KTs
(2) Planned Irrigation Performances and Crop ProductionAnnual
Paddy (ha) Palawija Others (ha) Total (ha) Intensity Paddy Palawija Others1,048 1,048 100% 5.0 5,2401,048 1,048 100% 5.0 5,240
210 210 20% 5042,096 210 0 2,306 220% 5.0 10,480 504 0
214 210 0 424 20% 1.0 2,952 504 0
IV.1 Existing Condition(1) Number a. Target; 7 b. Established; 4 c. Not yet; 3 Registered 0
Performance a. Developed; 0 b. Under developing; 4 c. Not yet; 0 Not yet registered 4
(2) Problems and ConstraintsOperation Maintenance Management
(3) Causes of Problems and Constraints- Less attention to O&M works among WUA members.
IV.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures
- Activation of WUA O&M works.
(2) Development Plan- O&M training for WUA membership.
Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field
Season Cropped Area in Irrigated Paddy Field Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
Season II (dry I)Season III (dry II)
Season I (wet)
Total/Annual
Irrigated Paddy Yield(GKG ton/ha)
Crop Production (ton)
Season I (wet)Season II (dry I)
Season III (dry II)Total/Annual
a. Irrigated paddy fieldb. Rainfed paddy fieldc. Upland Fieldd. Uncultivated Lande. Non-irrigableTotal
III. AGRICULTURE
Crop Production (ton) 1/Season
Plan (ha) Increment (ha)Category Present (ha)
h. WUAs dataC A
II. SUBJECT AREA FOR REHABILITATION PLAN
I. PROJECT FUNDAMENTALS
a. Design Reports of Existing System(Full set) d. Structure lists & diagramB B
IV. WUAs
Annual Increment
3 - 29
South Sulawesi Province8. Aparang Hulu Scheme
(2/4)
V.1 Existing Condition(1) Overall Irrigation System : D (A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
Water Resources Facility : C Main Canal System : D Secondary Canal System : D On-farm : D(2) Water Resources Facilty
a. Type of facility : Headworks e. Scouring sluice gate : 1 nos. i. Condition : Cb. Type of weir : Fixed weir f. Intake gate : 1 nos.c. Length of weir : 13 m g. Settling basin : not providedd. Design intake discharge : 1.3 m3/s h. Inspection bridge : not provided (no info.: no information)
(3) Irrigation Canal and Inspection RoadCanal Lined (m) Unlined (m) Total (m)
Main 1,755 200 1,955Secondary 2,873 3,000 5,873
(4) Major Problems and Constrains- Water Resources Facility
Settlement or breakdown of apron of weirPhysical operational problem on flood/scouring sluice gate(s) of headworksPhysical operational problem on intake gate(s)
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureImpassable of inspection road along canalGeneral O&M problemsDifficulty on O&M
(5) Causes of Major Problems and Constraints- Water Resources Facility
Insufficient strength of weir foundation, not enough foundation treatment, or insufficient length of apronImproper design, installation and/or maintenance of flood/scouring sluice gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leafImproper design, installation and/or maintenance of intake gate(s); breakdown of hoist, stem, guide frame or leaf
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureImproper routine O&M works due to no or narrow wide of road, slope erosion by rainfall then in flow into canalNo kilo and hectometer post, no structure plate or mark on structures and no identification for repair/maintenanceNo provision or damage of inspection road, difficulty on passing of inspection road due to damage, broken
V.2 Development Plan(1) Proposed Countermeasures for Major Problems
- Water Resources FacilityReconstruction of apron of weirReplacement of control system or damaged equipment of flood/scouring sluice gate(s)Replacement of intake gate(s)
- Irrigation Canal and Related StructureProvision of inspection road both main and secondary canal with pavementProvision of kilo, hect-m posts, marking to each structure with structure nameProvision or repair of inspection road with all weather type/pavement
(2) Water Resources Facility Dam/Headworks body Intake, civil Intake, mechanicalSettling basin
(3) Irrigation Canal and Related Structure
MainSecondaryMainSecondary
(4) On-farm Development (Unit: ha)a. Potential Irrigated paddy field 941 d. Non-potential paddy field 0b. Potential non-irrigated paddy field 0 e. Non-potenttial non-paddy field 153c. Potential non-paddy field 0 1,094
(5) Rehabilitation Cost (Direct Cost) (Unit: Million Rp.)On-Farm Project CostDevelop. Facility per ha
2,710 9,589 959 2,713 1,260 17,232 15.8 (W.R.F: Water Resources Facility, Develop.: Development)
VI.1 EIRR 14.3%
VI.2 Prioritization ScoringEvaluation Index Full Score Score Evaluation Index Full Score Score Total Score
Utilization of Irrigation Potential 10.0 5.0 Agricultural Productivity 20.0 11.0 69.0Urgency 25.0 23.0 Social Problem 15.0 10.5Sustainability 15.0 10.5 Economic Impact 15.0 9.0
VI.3 Priority Group VI.4 Priority Ranking in the Province 12
No rehabilitation00
00
(A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Notfunctioning well, D: Serious condition for operation)
(A: Functioning well,B: Partially deteriorated,C: Not functioning well,D: Serious condition foroperation)
DD
: minor rehabilitation: replacement or new
2111,175
Works
: minor rehabilitation
New construction
IrrigationSystem
VI. PROJECT EVALUATION
Irrigation Drainage TotalW.R.F
5
1113
00
: replacement or new
Total
1813
7,048
13
196Rehabilitation
1,9555,873
Group II: Second priority group
V. IRRIGATION FACILITY
Inspection road (m)
Canal (m)
Structure(nos)
2,151Total
ConditionStructure (nos)
3 - 30
South Sulawesi Province8. Aparang Hulu Scheme(3/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Headworks)
StructureFixed Weir
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Headworks)
StructureScouring Sluice Gate
Condition
Problems
CategoryIrrigation (Main Canal)
StructureDivision Structure
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
Lower function of division structure; deterioration ofgates; sedimentation at inside of canal; physicaloperation problem on structure.
D
Leakage from gate leaf; insufficient strength againstdesign load due to rust, decay of steel material; problemon management due to lack of periodically maintenance
A B C D
A B C
Technical Level
SinjaiAparang Hulu
1,049 haSemi-technical
District
Registered Area
Scheme
Crack or damage on weir crest; settlement of weir body;deflection of pier of weir
D
1985Year of Construction
A B C
SS.13.33
SS.13.34
SS.13.40
3 - 31
South Sulawesi Province8. Aparang Hulu Scheme
(4/4)
CategoryIrrigation (Secondary Canal)
StructureSecondary Canal
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, On-Farm
ActivityLand Preparation by Horse Power
Condition
Problems
CategoryAgriculture, On-Farm
ActivityThreshering by Power
Condition
Problems
Condition: A: Functioning well, B: Partially deteriorated, C: Not functioning well, D: Serious condition for operation
D
Low density of on-farm canals and farm roads.
Semi-technical 1,049 ha Year of Construction
A B C
1985
D
Sedimentation, collapse of canal; leakage from canal;difficulty on maintenance of earth canal.
Technical Level Registered Area
A B C
Scheme Aparang Hulu District Sinjai
DA B C
SS.13.38
3 - 32