Post on 19-Sep-2020
transcript
This project is financedby the European Union
A project implemented by the consortium of: WS Atkins International (lead), Pescares Italia Srl., GIZ, SML.
The European Union and Neighbours ENI – The European Neighbourhood Instrument
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogueon Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
National Blue Economy study
December 11st, 2017, Tel Aviv, Israel
This project is financedby the European Union 2
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
BLUE ECONOMY SCOPES
Maritime and coastal
market-driven activities
Cons:- Resources and space not
considered- Non-market activities not
captured- Synergies between market-
driven and non-market driven activities cannot be captured
- Assessment of potential new activities not easy
Maritime and coastal
market-driven activities
Maritime and coastal capital
Maritime and coastal non-
market-driven activities
+ Relations
Conventional scope of Blue Economy doesn’t capture all the maritime added value
Blue Economy: scope of this studyBlue Economyconventional scope
This project is financedby the European Union 3
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
The Maritime and coastal Capital – Basis for BE
Policy-driven maritime activities
Market-driven maritime activities
Products and
services
Regulation, management, knowledge,
research…
produce Innovation, knowledge,
training…
Use
Mobilize
Mobilize
Require
Preserve
This project is financedby the European Union 4
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Recommendations for developing Blue Economy
Increase, extend, improve, promote recognize, value,
manage
Develop, increase local content
Develop, increase local
contentDevelop,
increase local content
Produce more or better
Get more Value
Develop, increase local content, create
new sectors
Develop synergiesInnovate
This project is financedby the European Union
A project implemented by the consortium of: WS Atkins International (lead), Pescares Italia Srl., GIZ, SML.
Assessment of maritime and coastal Capital
5
This project is financedby the European Union 6
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Global overview of Israel’s maritime and coastal capital
High level of pressures (infrastructure, urban and rural development along the coast) but protection measures (MPA) – marine reserve in Red Sea
Large access to Mediterranean but also to Red Sea ; High level of pressures on coastal zones ; Management process (MSP)
Substantial offshore resources (O&G)Declining fishing ;Unexplored SWAC and offshore wind potentials ; No marine minerals use
Good level of knowledge, some gaps (offshore) but improving
academic and research institutes (Israel Marine Data Center (ISRAMAR),
IOLR, Naval institute, …)
Good availability of infrastructures and services to support import supply ; Project to develop
offshore space use with dedicated structures
High national investments (tax reduction forattractiveness).Privatization of maritime economy attractinginternational capital.Low level of national control on financialcapital?
Significant maritime culture and heritage (coastal and underwater)
Maritime governance is still mainly sectoral. But efforts towards more integration
Israelmaritime and coastal capital
This project is financedby the European Union 7
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
THREATS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
STRENGTHS
ENJEUX
Israel Maritime and Coastal Capital – SWOT Analysis
• Offshore space accessible to offshore structures• MSP and MPAs• Offshore O&G resources availability
• Access to both Mediterranean and Red Sea• Good connections to land (ports, road, rail, cables, pipes)• Significant coastal and marine cultural heritage• Technical and scientific ability to valorize and protect the
capital• Ability to attract foreign investments • Diaspora support
• Sovereignty and jurisdiction disputed• Dependence of neighbours (environmental
management)• Erosion issues in coastal space• Busy space (land, coastal)• Limited marine natural resources
• Security issues, jurisdiction and sovereignty• Erosion• Strong human pressures on coastal zones• Pollution and biodiversity loss• Climate change• Use conflicts in busy areas
This project is financedby the European Union 8
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
• Develop knowledge and management of resources and heritage• Enhance integrated regulation and management (MPA and MSP, SEA/EIA)• Develop integrated (multilevel) governance involving national and local
authorities and public participation• Define clear policies for preservation, sustainable use and development of
national maritime and coastal capital (environment, resources, research, infra & services…)
• Take advantage of O&G revenues (through specific fund?) for supporting these policies and improve coastal and maritime infrastructures and services
• Build a more resilient development model based on preservation of natural capital, stimulation of human capital, and optimization of the technical capital.
• Update and implement ICZM at national scale as a framework for all coastal projects
Recommandations for the maritime and coastal capital
This project is financedby the European Union
A project implemented by the consortium of: WS Atkins International (lead), Pescares Italia Srl., GIZ, SML.
Assessment of Policy-driven activities
(Management, regulation, knowledge production and sharing)
9
This project is financedby the European Union 10
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Policy-driven Maritime Activities: management of maritime capital
Monitoring and surveillancenetworks and services, enforcement (ships, airplanes, crews...)
Management of national financial resources and services (bank, investment funds, pooling of
resources..)
Policy and strategy making, regulation, public participation
Inventory (knowledge), management, valorization, development
Production of knowledge(universities, research institutions), transfer (education and training, dissemination (maritime portals for data and information....
Inventory (knowledge), management (e.g. MPAs),
protection (regulation), monitoring
Management, monitoring and surveillance networks and services,
enforcement (ships, airplanes, crews...)
Inventory (knowledge), management,
regulation, protection...
Research and Knowledge
Regulation and surveillance
Management and protection
This project is financedby the European Union 11
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Regulation and Surveillance – SWOT Analysis
THREATS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
STRENGTHS
ENJEUX
• Unregulated maritime and coastal activities ? (overexploitation of resources, threats to marine and coastal environment)
• Integration of maritime surveillance and marine and coastal monitoring (environment and activities)
• Contribution from regulatory monitoring to national monitoring network
• Upgrading the technology deployed at Israel’s ports• ECosystem APproach implementation ( Barcelona
convention)• Safety and security issues
• Good maritime surveillance (safety/security/defense)• Strong capacities for enforcement• Monitoring indicators : environment• Monitoring and enforcement of land-based sources of
marine pollution - a national center for on-line surveillance of effluent outfalls to the sea.
• Limited integration of regulation and surveillance (thematic or sectoral)
• Low integration of environmental monitoring and surveillance of activities
This project is financedby the European Union 12
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Research and Knowledge– SWOT Analysis
THREATS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
STRENGTHS
• Limited knowledge on offshore areas • Difficulties for institutes to find contracts• National marine/maritime research strategy not very
visible
• High level in public R&D and observations capacities• Many institutes with high level of skills• Public capacities to enhance TRL and support innovation
and private sectors• Existing GIS and dedicated portal for data sharing and
dissemination (ISP Web GIS)• Good connection with private sectors (financing
contracts)• Liaison with EU countries , EU and USA
• Reduction of public support to the public maritime and coastal research and education
• Insufficient information hampering development of economic activities
• Increase of private sector in public R&D (already 69% of Israel’s GERD is contributed by the Private Sector)
• Contribution from EIA and regulatory monitoring to knowledge
• Development of policies and associated research about Climate change and sustainability
• Better dissemination (e.g. maritime portal) and transmission (maritime cursus, education)
• Interdisciplinary maritime/marine curricula
This project is financedby the European Union 13
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Management and protection – SWOT Analysis
THREATS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
STRENGTHS
ENJEUX
• Climate change effects on biodiversity and coastal zones (erosion, sea level threats)
• Human pressures - cumulative effects and urbanization
• Risks of sewage and maritime pollutions (domestic and other countries)
• Urban sprawl
• Policies taking in account Climate change and sustainability
• Natural and human heritage protection• Seamless planning in maritime and coastal zones• Marine renewable energies (SWAC and offshore
wind) development ( potential to be assessed and taken in account in MSP
• On going Planning – master plans (Israel Marine Plan (ISP)) • Full public involvement in planning process (MSP) and
methods (ICZM protocol) and experience in CAMP project• Stakeholders involvement in dedicated structures • Strong NGOs (Society for the Protection of Nature in Israel
(SPNI), Israel Union for Environmental Defence (IUED), …)• Settlement and development of marine protected areas • Development of integration in Policies (TBC)• Bidding process for O&G offshore fields exploitation
• Border effects management (sewage or maritime pollutions)
• No dedicated measures for sea to implement Paris Agreement (cf. national plan)
• No clear policy orientations about MPAs in Israel • Sectoral management of marine resources
This project is financedby the European Union
A project implemented by the consortium of: WS Atkins International (lead), Pescares Italia Srl., GIZ, SML.
Assessment of Maritime Economic Activities
(MEAs)
14
This project is financedby the European Union 15
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Overview of Maritime Economic Activities for BE in Israel
More mature “to be reinvented”
Coastal tourism
Cruises
Passenger ferry
Fisheries
Shipbuilding, repair and deconstruction
Offshore oil-gas
Shipping
Mariculture
Yachting and boating
Desalination
Marine renewable technologies
Offshore wind
Water sports and leisure
Blue-biotech
Potentials
Rele
vanc
e
Mature : adaptation needed Growing : potential for development
Discussed : potential not proven Emerging : support needed
This project is financedby the European Union 16
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Overview of Maritime Economic Activities for BE in Israel
Potentials
Curr
ent w
eigh
t
Offshore O&G
Passenger Ferry
Cruising
Fisheries
Shipping
BoatingShipbuilding
And repair
Desalination
Water sports
Mariculture Blue BiotechMarine renewable energies
This project is financedby the European Union 17
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Shipping : strengthen quality and strategic synergies (logistics, surveillance, …) at national and regional scaleFerry/Passengers: develop domestic links, including maritime urban transport as an alternative to land public transport in busy coastal cities
Desalination: reduce energy bill with use of REN or MRE,explore valorization of desalination brines (extraction of dissolved substances: salt, metals, …)
Cruises: rather than focusing on large ships (high costs, low local return) explore the whole range including short excursions and small/medium ship cruises, promoting cultural assets and providing high local value and jobs
Fisheries: explore the potential of allocating some fishing resources/areas to leisure fishing in order to produce more added value (jobs/revenues: pay for fishing + pay for fish)
Yachting and boating: rather than the usual model (marinas, inactive fleet: much space artificialized, limited local return), support shared uses and “boating and yachting as a service” approaches
Mariculture: explore the potential of algae for food, cosmetics and pharmaceutical sector, and potential synergies with marine biotechnologies
Nautical and water sports: switch from opportunist individual practice to promotion of dedicated affected areas, seeking synergies with coastal and marine protected areas
Coastal tourism: rather than mass “sea sun sand” resorts, move upmarket and develop an offer based on maritime and coastal cultural heritageExplore potential extension of offer to mobile workers to fill seasonal gaps in tourism resorts
Marine biotechnologies: Actively prospect local specific marine resources that could allow creation of local biotech ecosystem including research, production, training, derived production, etc.
BE: examples of possible options/ actions for MEAs
Ship building and repair : Enhance integration and skills(HQSE) addressing all the sectors (shipping, ferry, fishing,port supply)Develop regional partnerships to reduce competition andaddress the important national demand includingdeconstructionMarine Renewable Energies: assess potential of all MRE resources based on in situ measurements and synergies with shipbuilding and energy supply
O&G exploitation: Develop LNG production for shipping and energy transport, define strategic uses and stocks in order to prepare future
This project is financedby the European Union 18
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Current size
Target size
Sector growth
Increased share
Adapt current model
Change model
Develop new options
MEAs : Development options
Growth of sector in volume and/or value:Exploit more resources or more space, capture larger share of value chain at national or regional levelCreate local jobs
Adaptation: Modification of the current model to focus activity on most interesting segments of the value chain of the activity, upmarket
Structural changes:Address other segments of market with development of synergies
New options:Exploit new resources, diversify outputs and services
Growth of regional share:Capture more value in the region, control more capital
This project is financedby the European Union 19
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Orientations for development of MEAs: Overview
Maturity Current sector growth
NationalCurrent
employment
MEA/Natcap
MEA/Techcap
MEA/Humcap
National captured
value
Region share
Adaptation Structural change
New options
Fisheries mature -- +++ ++++ ++ +++ 0/+ - ++ + ++
Mariculture developing 0 0 ++ ++ ++ 0/+ - + +
Biotechnologies emerging 0 0 ++ + ++ NR + +
Cruise, maritime tourism
mature ++ 0 ++ ++ ++ 0/+ + + ++ ++
Coastal tourism mature + +++ +++ ++ +++ + + + ++ +
Water leisure and sport
developing + 0/+ +++ ++ ++ 0/+ ++
Yachting and boating
mature 0 + +++ ++ ++ 0 + + ++ +
Shipping mature + + ++ ++ +++ + ++ + +
Passenger ferry mature + + ++ ++ ++ 0/+ ++ ++
Shipbuildingand repair
mature + + ++ ++ ++ + + +
Marine renewable energies
emerging 0 0 + + + NR +
Desalination mature/dev ++ + ++ ++ ++ ++ + + +
Offshore O&G mature/dev ++ + +++ ++ + ++ +
This project is financedby the European Union 20
Supporting a Regional Policy Dialogue on Climate Action and Integrated Maritime Policy / Blue Economy
Fisheries
Growth of sector in volume and/or value:Claim maritime areas and related fisheries resources. Support stocks recovery, ecosystem-based
Adaptation:Increase share of artisanal fleet locally controlled (capital, jobs)
Structural changes:Upmarket towards local high-value products: short circuits, direct selling (e.g. to high quality restoration)
New options:Support non-food activities: leisure (« pay for fishing ») through development of synergies (MPAs, tourism sector)
Growth of regional share:Improve regional control (financial capital, fleets) and regulation (stocks, all catches), training and adapttion of local fishermen
Current situation
• Limited resources, at threat (poor environmental management, poor activity management)
• Limited control on resources/catches
• Low price at first sale (global market)
• Competition between industrial/semi-industrial and artisanal fleets
• Decreasing number of jobs, fishermen revenues
Analysis - Orientations
• No major growth can be expected• Ecosystems and stocks recovery
a regional priority
• Overall orientation: get more local value from the same or reduced catches
• Option 1: capture larger share of stocks
• Option 2: increase price at first sale
• Option 3: prioritize increase of local jobs/local value within fishing sector
• Option 4: allocate areas/stocks to development of sectors that produce more value/jobs from the same amount of fish
This project is financedby the European Union 21
Supporting a Regional Policy Dialogue on Climate Action and Integrated Maritime Policy / Blue Economy
Coastal tourism
Growth of sector in volume and/or value:Limited share as “Sea, sand and sun offer”Answer domestic demand for resilienceImprove safety and security
Adaptation:develop synergies with local maritime activities (fisheries, yachting, …) to enlarge touristic offer but also with inland tourism)
Structural changes:Reduce environmental impact of resorts (REN, circular economy)
New options:Develop green and cultural tourism (cultural heritage
Growth of regional share:Share regional assets with touristic tours (link with small cruise and yachting)
Current situation
• “Sea, sand and sun” -driven offer mass tourism
• Mainly foreign tourist oriented• Growing domestic demand• Sector mainly controlled out of
the area (operators/investments)• Sustainability to be improved
(resorts)• High costs (infra, security…),
mid local return (mid expenses, numerous jobs)
• Low resilience (security issues)• Seasonal activity
• Other sectors (eco tourism/ cultural tourism) developing
• Regional assets (natural/cultural) little exploited
• Natural and cultural assets favourable to further development
Analysis - Orientations
• Need and will to reduce impacts of human activities and valorize heritage sustainably
• Increasing privatization of public domain
• Need to increase quality and added-value actually captured by local operators
• Possible synergies with other activities for diversification (yachting and marinas, aquatic sports, fisheries, …)
• Orientation1: assess sustainability and potential for local return before supporting development of new resorts
• Orientation 2: foster quality rather than mass tourism
• Orientation 3: Develop local offers valorising regional assets
This project is financedby the European Union 22
Supporting a Regional Policy Dialogue on Climate Action and Integrated Maritime Policy / Blue Economy
Cruise sector
Growth of sector in volume and/or value:Limit share or large ships cruise or make support conditional to increased local return (longer calls,, etc.)
Adaptation:Develop other subsectors (small/medium ships cruise) locally built/controlled with high local return (jobs/value)
Structural changes:Support development of cruises focused on cultural heritage/attractions rather mass tourism
New options:Develop very short cruise sector (maritime excursions) with strong synergies with coastal tourism
Growth of regional share:Support sub-regional trips (home ports and major calls in the area), more open to domestic customers
Current situation
• Large cruise ships, mass tourism
• Sector controlled out of the region
• High costs (infra, security…), low local return (limited expenses, no jobs)
• Short calls, home ports out of the area
• Low resilience (security issues)
• Other cruise sectors (small/medium, excursions) little developed
• Regional assets (natural/cultural) little exploited
• Natural and cultural assets favourable to further development
Analysis - Orientations
• Contradiction between sector and countries interests (large ships)
• Large potential for other subsectors with much larger local return
• Local assets little valorised (a few sites only)
• Limited local customer base
• Orientation1: assess potential for local return before supporting development of large cruise ships
• Orientation 2: foster quality rather than mass cruising
• Orientation 3: Develop local trips valorizing regional assets
• Orientation 4: develop segments with high local control producing more local value and jobs
This project is financedby the European Union 23
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Cruise tourism: increase local return (1)
Home port
Call
Call
Call
Call
Call
Call
Day 2
- 1 week, 6 calls. Sail overnight- Calls: a few short circuits/visits- Not all passengers disembark
Ship construction
Ship operation
Hotel services
Marketing sales
Most of value and jobs (somewhere…
foreign/international)
Home ports can catch additional
value
Call ports catch a small share of the
value
Limited tourism services
Tourism services
Transportation
Financial capital
Value chain and distribution
« Standard » MED cruise
This project is financedby the European Union 24
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Cruise tourism: increase local return (2) – Some opportunities
Home port
Call
Call
Call
Call
Call
Call
Day 2
Financial capital
Ship construction
Ship operation
Hotel services
Marketing sales
TransportationTourism services
Control financial capital: decision on value chain, financial returns
Build in national shipyards
Operate, employ nationals
Operate, employ nationals, shipchandlers, etc.
Locate in country
« Cut the loop »: insert national tourism offer
within standard regional cruises
Locate home port in country
This project is financedby the European Union 25
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Approach of Integrated Functional Clusters (IFCs)
In the analysis and recommendations we move:• From Value “Chains” (sectoral/linear);• To Value “Nets” (inter-sectoral/complex).
We identify Integrated Functional Clusters (IFCs) as they:• Refer to various activities (integrated); • Focus on functions (functional) rather then “definitions”;• Share infrastructures services and facilities (clusters).
This project is financedby the European Union 26
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
IFC« Maritime and coastal tourism and leisure
Cruise tourism
Large ships
Small & medium
ships
Excursions
Fishing
Commercial fishing
Pesca-tourism
Leisurefishing
Coastal tourism
Resorts
2nd
house
Circuits
Bathing
Diving
Water leisure
Water sports
ShippingUrban
transport
FerriesEnvironmental management
MPAs
Monitoring
Renting & sharing
Yachting & boating
Harbour services
Each sector has its own dynamics, but there are many potential synergies within this cluster• Driven by tourism and
leisure• Many possible links to be
explored (only some represented here)
• E.g. MPAs and excursions, diving, water sports, tourism circuits, yachting, leisure fishing….
This project is financedby the European Union 27
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
IFC« Maritime and coastal tourism and leisure
Cruise tourism
Large ships
Small & medium
ships
Excursions
Fishing
Commercial fishing
Pesca-tourism
Leisurefishing
Coastal tourism
Resorts
2nd
house
Circuits
Bathing
Diving
Water leisure
Water sports
ShippingUrban
transport
FerriesEnvironmental management
MPAs
Monitoring
Renting & sharing
Yachting & boating
Harbour services
• A national «cluster » may gather all these stakeholders: project developments, marketing (global offer), etc.
This project is financedby the European Union 28
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
IFC « tourism-leisure » : Examples of potential synergies withmaritime excursions within cluster
Cruise tourism
Large ships
Small & medium
ships
Excursions
Fishing
Commercial fishing
Pesca-tourism
Leisurefishing
Coastal tourism
Resorts
2nd
house
Circuits
Bathing
Diving
Water leisure
Water sports
ShippingUrban
transport
FerriesEnvironmental management
MPAs
Monitoring
Renting & sharing
Yachting & boating
Harbour services
Fish: gastronomy excursions
Extension of excursion
Extension of excursion
Excursions offer
Excursion as a harbour service
Connection/extension
Excursion in MPAs (natural or cultural)
Excursion ships used for routine monitoring
This project is financedby the European Union 29
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Maritime tourismMaritime and coastal sectors involved Expected synergies
• Marketing• Tourism packages• Port services• Shared infrastructures
SHIPPINGFERRY
FISHERIES• Artisanal fisheries
COASTAL TOURISM
• Ferry/urban maritime transport
CRUISE TOURISM
WATER LEISURE
YACHTING• Pilot project
Possible actions
Policy-driven sectors involvedPROTECTION
• MPAs including Natural and cultural heritage
Coastal tourism
Ferry
Yachting
PescatourismGastronomy
TransportExcursions
Water Sport
• Medium and small ships cruises
• Sailing cruises rentals
• Dedicated spots with a national/regional tour
• Touristic circuit
Cruisetourism
Artisanal fisheries
Touristic circuitShared infras
ProtectionMPA
MPA
KnowledgeMonitoring
• Natural and cultural heritage knowledge improvement and dissemination
• Dedicated monitoring
MPA
Shared infrasand services
TransportExcursionsShared infras
and services
Touristiccircuit
Blue Economy : suggested Integrated Functional Clusters
This project is financedby the European Union 30
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
MonitoringKnowledge
Desalination
Marine Energy
Mariculture
MarineBiotech
BE national platform forstrategic development
Skills and capacity
DiversificationEnergy supply
IFCMaritimeTourism
Water usage
Blue Economy : suggested Integrated Functional Clusters
Water, advanced products and sustainable energy
Expected synergies
• Infrastructures/Investments• Technological expertise• Research capacity
• Engage with private sector and research
• Assess cross-sectoralclusters potentials
• Launch key strategic actions (potential assessment, feasibility studies, business cases, pilot initiatives)
Possible actions
Policy-driven sectors involved
MONITORING KNOWLEDGEExpand and build on potentials of monitoring technologiesNatural heritage knowledge improvement
INNOVATIONFoster cross-sectoral research and innovationBuild on existing national/international advanced applied research
Maritime and coastal sectors involved
MARINEBIOTECH
MARICULTURE
High-end research supported by terrestrial biotechnologies transfer
High-end product diversificationMARINEENERGY
DESALINATION
In accordance with the potentials to be assessed Desalination derived product valorisation (brines) – environmental impact reduction – use of REN
Exploit areas of technological innovation across more mature activities
Foster growth and employmentby applying high-tech innovation to more
emerging activities
This project is financedby the European Union 31
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Blue Economy: where is the potential? Some hints
Offshore infrastructures(including networks)
Knowledge,skills, capacity
Culture and heritage valorization
Financial services formaritime economy
Preservation, conservation, management,
restoration
New resources (energy, metals, geneticresources…)
Shift to offshore
Appropriation by coastal territories + global governance in ABNJ
This project is financedby the European Union 32
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
This project is financedby the European Union 33
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
This project is financedby the European Union 34
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Thank you for your attention
Frédérick Herpersfrederick.herpers@strategies-marines.fr
Matteo Boccibocci.matteo@gmail.com
This project is financedby the European Union 35
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
National BE study (SML) National BE study (ADALYA)
Port : infrastructures and space part of capital not for a dedicated sector (shipping) as it is sharedPort Services also included in capital
Ports and services : only included with Shippingnot in fishing or yachting
Maritime and coastal space : part of natural capital
Mariculture Marine agriculture
Distinction netween MAE and PDA A mix of MAE and PDA Level of maturity for MAE Level of maturity for MAE but also for PDA (useful?
as not under the same ranking in priorities)Assessment of the potential of cruise tourism (low – low added value)
O&G finite resources
Yachting : assessment of practices and marinas are part of capital (infrastructures & services) closer to recreationnal coastal navigation
Yachting/marinas: reduced to berths or dockingplaces
Water sport & leisures : domestic and foreigndemand and practices
recreationnal coastal navigation and diving tourism :Partial
This project is financedby the European Union 36
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Port and activities
LANDSEA
Coastal zone
GoodsPassengers
InformationEnergy
Biological resources
Ocean energy resources
Mineral resources
PortsHarbours
Import
ImportExport
SendReceive
Import
Import
Ports areas are major assets for Blue Economy
àActivity clusters, not just transport infrastructures
This project is financedby the European Union 37
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Blue Economy: where is the potential? Some hints
Offshore infrastructures(including networks)
Knowledge,skills, capacity
Culture and heritage valorization
Financial services formaritime economy
Preservation, conservation, management,
restoration
New resources (energy, metals, geneticresources…)
Shift to offshore
Appropriation by coastal territories + global governance in ABNJ
This project is financedby the European Union 38
Facility for Regional Policy Dialogue on Integrated Maritime Policy / Climate Change
Recommendations• World trends driven and then Med focus – high level drivers - relevance for Israel to check• Typologies in accordance with EU BE studies better to split MEA and PDA• Points of attention
– Sectoral approach and assessment => research of synergies between sectors (IFC)• Shipbuilding and repair not only for shipping but also yachting, marinas fisheries• Investments diversification (PPP) to promote synergies through clusters
– PDA : • better to use an agregated typology based on functions and policies in an integrative approach
(synergies – public savings)– MAE
• Potential evolutions or diversification of sector itself• Assessment of national added value to capture along the value chain• prospective for potential export (know how)
– Capital • Human capital (knowledge, skills) to be taken in account as a pillar for development of maritime
sectors from terrestrial sectors (technologies transfer)• Human capital (Cultural heritage) to be valorized (Tourism and leisure)• Space/infrastructures/skills/Research to be shared to support
– Homes and employment are not BE activities better to use as a driver (urbanisation)