Fatigue Performance of High Strength Riser Materials RPSEA Project No. DW 1403 PWC Web Meeting

Post on 23-Feb-2016

32 views 0 download

description

Fatigue Performance of High Strength Riser Materials RPSEA Project No. DW 1403 PWC Web Meeting November 6, 2009 Prepared by Stephen J. Hudak, Jr. and James H. Feiger Materials Engineering Department Southwest Research Institute. Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

1

Fatigue Performance of High Strength Riser Materials

RPSEA Project No. DW 1403

PWC Web MeetingNovember 6, 2009

Prepared byStephen J. Hudak, Jr. and James H. Feiger

Materials Engineering DepartmentSouthwest Research Institute

Research Partnership to Secure Energy for America

2

Meeting Objective Review variable frequency test data Select test protocol for future testing

• Fatigue Crack Growth Rates (FCGR)• Classical S-N fatigue life

3

MaterialsMaterial YS: min/meas Sour Status

1 110/123 ksi yes frequency-scan complete;Fatigue testing underway

2 125/137 ksi yes frequency-scan completeFatigue testing underway

3 125/134 ksi yes Received material this quarter;Specimen machining completeFrequency-scan complete

4 125/132 ksi no frequency-scan complete;Fatigue testing underway.

5 125/163 ksi no Frequency-scan complete;Fatigue testing underway

6 114 ksi yes S-N specs. MachinedFreq-Scan tests underway

4

Environments Lab air (baseline): 70-75°F, 40-60% RH

Seawater: ASTM D1141 substitute ocean water open to the air with cathodic protection: - 1050mv vs. Saturated Calomel Electrode

Sour Brine: Production brine with oxygen below 10 ppb and 35% H2S + 65% CO2

5

Background: Freq. Dependence Complex at Low DK

Region IIClassicalFreq. Effect

Region IInverseFreq Effect

Mod 4130 Steel: YS=98ksiSour Environment

6

Inverse Freq. Effect at Low DK Due to Corrosion-Product Wedging

d=1/p (Kmax/E sys)2

DK, ksiin1 10 100

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-9

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

SeawaterLab Air (2 Tests)

YS = 114 ksiSeawater and Lab AirKmax = 44 ksiinC = -6 in-1 0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

123 ksi Steel in SW+CP vs. Lab AirFrequency Schedule 1

DK, ksiin1 10 100

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-9

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

SeawaterLab Air (2 Tests)

YS = 114 ksiSeawater and Lab AirKmax = 44 ksiinC = -6 in-1

0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

123 ksi Steel in SW+CP vs. Lab AirFrequency Schedule 2

DK, ksiin1 10 100

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-9

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

SeawaterSeawaterLab Air (2 Tests)

YS = 114 ksiSeawater and Lab AirKmax = 44 ksiinC = -6 in-1 0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

123 ksi Steel in SW+CP vs. Lab AirSchedule 1 vs Schedule 2

DK, ksiin1 10 100

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-9

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

Sour BrineLab Air (2 tests)

YS = 114 ksiSour Brine and Lab AirKmax = 44 ksiinC = -6 in-1 0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

123 ksi Steel in Sour Brine vs. Lab AirFrequency Schedule 1

DK, ksiin1 10 100

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-9

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

Sour BrineLab Air (2 tests)

YS = 114 ksiSour Brine and Lab AirKmax = 44 ksiinC = -6 in-1

0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

123 ksi Steel in Sour Brine vs. Lab AirFrequency Schedule 2

DK, ksiin1 10 100

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-9

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

Sour BrineSour BrineLab Air (2 tests)

YS = 114 ksiSour Brine and Lab AirKmax = 44 ksiinC = -6 in-1 0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

0.01 Hz

0.17 Hz

1 Hz

123 ksi Steel in Sour Brine vs. Lab Air

Schedule 1 vs Schedule 2

123 ksi Steel in Sour Brine vs. Lab Air

13

?

Test Frequency Options Replicate tests using Frequency Schedule 1

• Advantage: closest to service conditions• Disadvantage: may be non-conservative, and increases

test duration Replicate tests using Frequency Schedule 2

• Advantage: provides conservative results, and decreases test duration

• Disadvantage: may not be best representation of riser loading frequency – i.e. damage may be too conservative

One test each at Frequency Schedules 1 and 2• Advantage: Defines effect of frequency on fatigue damage• Disadvantage: no test replication

14

Project Schedule Complete FCGR testing: 4-6 months

Complete S-N testing: 12-14 months• Total Material-Envirs. 9 (including added sour tests• Completed Mat-Envirs. 1• Remaining Mat-Envirs. 8• Remaining machine time: 48 Months• Remaining calendar time: 12-14 months (4 test machines)

15

Other Issues1. Higher strength materials exhibiting signs of

SCC in both sour brine and SW+CP• Recommend adding selected SCC tests• Formulating Workscope and cost estimate for SCC

testing2. Need to add funding for additional sour

brine testing identified at kick-off meeting• Total cost = testing cost – savings on air tests being

conducted at NETL• Formulating workscope and cost estimate for these addition

sour brine tests.• Source of cost sharing: donated materials?

16

Seawater vs. Sour Brine

17

YS = 132 ksi

Crack Length, in.0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10 Hz - air10 Hz - seawater1Hz - seawater0.33 Hz - seawater0.1 Hz - seawater0.01 Hz - seawater

YS = 131 ksiSeawaterDK=20 ksiinR=0.5

Seawater

15X

Crack Length, in.0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10 Hz - air10 Hz - sour brine1Hz - sour brine0.33 Hz - sour brine0.1 Hz - sour brine0.01 Hz - sour brine

YS = 131 ksiSour BrineDK=20 ksiinR=0.5

250X

Sour Brine

Backup Slides

18

19

FCGR Specimen

Crack Length, in.0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10 Hz - air10 Hz - seawater1Hz - seawater0.33 Hz - seawater0.1 Hz - seawater0.01 Hz - seawater

YS = 132 ksiSeawaterDK=20 ksiinR=0.5

20

Frequency Scan Testing

Corrosion fatigue performance sensitive to loading frequency

Fatigue crack growth rates at constant-DK used to characterize frequency effect in frequency scan (FS) tests

13x

Seawater

Seawater vs. Sour Brine

21

Crack Length, in.0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10 Hz - air10 Hz - seawater1Hz - seawater0.33 Hz - seawater0.1 Hz - seawater0.01 Hz - seawater

YS = 114 ksiSeawaterDK=20 ksiinR=0.5

6X

Seawater

Crack Length, in.0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10 Hz - air10 Hz - sour brine1Hz - sour brine0.33 Hz - sour brine0.1 Hz - sour brine0.01 Hz - sour brine

YS = 114 ksiSour BrineDK=20 ksiinR=0.5

24X

Sour Brine

YS = 114 ksi

Frequency Response vs. YS

22

Cyclic Frequency, Hz0.01 0.1 1 10

Aver

age

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

Sour BrineDK = 20 ksiinR=0.5

green: YS = 131 ksiblue: YS = 114 ksi

Sour Brine

Air Baseline

Cyclic Frequency, Hz0.01 0.1 1 10

Aver

age

da/d

N, i

n./c

ycle

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

SeawaterDK = 20 ksiinR=0.5

green: YS = 131 ksiblue: YS = 114 ksi

Seawater

Air Baseline

Yield Strength, ksi

114 131 132

Material-Environment Interactions

23

Environment:

Sour Brine

Seawater

24X 250X --- 6X 15X 15X

Corrosion-Fatigue Acceleration* vs. Air Baseline

* At DK= 20 ksi√in. R=0.5 and Frequency = 0.01 Hz