Post on 13-Jan-2015
description
transcript
1 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Fields, Innovations and Places:
Three Different Strategies for Social Innovators
Pete Plastrik and John ClevelandInnovation Network for Communities
January 23, 2009
2 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Agenda
• INC Background• Contexts for Social Change
– Fields
– Innovations
– Places
• Some Examples from INC Work• Application to WKKF Work• Next Steps
3 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Assumptions
• Not all philanthropy is focused on social change• There are many different kinds of philanthropy:
– Basic needs support
– Institutional support
– Social innovation (aka “social change”, “systems change” or “strategic” philanthropy
• Kellogg has clearly focused its work in the “social innovation niche”
• Kellogg’s investment in INC was designed to advance knowledge about the process and discipline of social innovation
4 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
INC Strategy Summary
Element Description
Mission To develop and spread scalable innovations that transform the performance of community systems.
Vision To establish an integrated national system for communities to import, develop, scale and export social innovations with transformative potential.
Strategies INC organizes production networks that design, prototype, launch, and scale place-based social innovations. These networks come in two types:•National networks focused on developing innovations for national distribution.•Place-based networks focused on organizing social innovation capacity in a specific community or region.
INC has focused on building networks, not an organization.
5 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Innovation Portfolio
Niche Innovations Urban Learning Systems
Urban learner “engagement schools” College completion models Urban school incubator
Networks for Social Change Network design and development Network evaluation
Adult Workforce Development Sector-based talent development systems Regional talent development systems
Double Bottom Line Private Equity Investment Funds
DBL Investing Institute
Urban Sustainability Sustainability Planning Building Retrofits Transit Innovations Sustainable Economic Development Community Energy Systems
Transnational Immigrant Communities
Global immigrant social networks Remittance-based immigrant community funds Transnational Immigration Index for Communities
Market-Driven Community Economic Development
Center for market-based economic development Regional development trusts
Community Development Philanthropy
Rural development philanthropy Charitable Asset Stewards
6 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Some INC Learning
• There are different ways to invest in social innovation:– Develop Fields
– Develop Innovations
– Develop Places
• Each kind of “social investing” requires different systems; competencies; and success criteria
• The three kinds of work are usually not clearly differentiated from each other – and differentiation can increase effectiveness
7 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Synergy Between the Domains Accelerates Change
Structured Field
A Family ofProven
Innovations
Deep Practice Environments
8 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Field Building
9 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Field Building
• Fields evolve in stages• Fields have some common elements; the work on
each elements changes over the stages• Fields often start with aspirational “movements”
that evolve to practice fields• Healthy fields create the “ecology” out of which
many innovations emerge• Ultimately, clusters of innovation are the core of
field development
10 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Examples of Relatively New Practice Fields
•Total Quality Management
•Environmental Sustainability
•Lean Manufacturing
•Corporate Social Responsibility
•Community Development
•Development Finance & Microfinance
•Regional Equity
•Urban Sustainability
11 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Some Elements of A “Field”
Element Description
Identity Definition of the “boundaries” of the field and the content it encompasses.
Frameworks Intellectual structures for organizing field content and knowledge, including core field hypotheses.
Practice Innovations New ways of doing things that emanate from the field hypotheses. These might be practices; processes; technologies; enterprises; or systems.
Standards Professional standards of practice that can be encompassed in Best Management Practices; credentials; certifications; etc.
Reward Systems Ways in which practice innovations are incentivized through public or private market mechanisms.
Networks Connecting, aligning and productung networks of players within the field.
R&D Investments in field innovations.
12 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
The Evolution of Practice Fields
Stage 1: FRAMING.
Stage 2: NETWORKING.
Stage 3: MATURATION.
Stage 4: STANDARDIZATION.
Conceptual framing and isolated practice examples.
Networking of innovators and the
proliferation of practices. Practices are fragmented and
often considered “proprietary.”
Maturation of practices;
convergence around common methods
and tools; integration of
previously differentiated
practices; development of a
professional implementation
support network.
Practices become highly standardized, and incorporated into
formal training; credentialing and
certification systems. Practices are considered
“commodities.” Reward systems reinforce desired
behaviors.
13 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Characteristics of “Young” & “Mature” Fields
Element Young Fields Mature Fields
Identity Confused/multiple identities Well defined boundaries; easy to know what is “in” and “out”
Frameworks Lack of integration between multiple frameworks
Strongly shared frameworks (theoretical premises; principles; ways to organize knowledge)
Practice Innovations
Competing “gurus” each of whom consider their ideas and business models to be “proprietary”
Standardization of methods, tools, enterprises, etc. for implementation
Standards Lack of standards in all areas Well-defined professional standards for defining competence & quality (regulatory; skill certification; testing of innovations)
Reward Systems
No real feedback mechanisms from the market
Market feedback matches best practice thinking
Networks Isolated individual practitioners Well developed networks for sharing knowledge and best practice
R&D Investment happens on a haphazard basis
Well organized R&D infrastructure to support innovation
14 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
An Example from the Urban Sustainability Field
Dimension Urban Sustainability Description
Field Definition Views cities as a solution to climate change, not a problem. The field encompasses the place-based practices that dramatically improve the environmental performance of cities while driving inclusive prosperity.
Frameworks •Science of climate change mitigation and adaptation.•Low carbon economy hypothesis.•Linking of economic development and reduced resource consumption to improved standards of living for all segments.
Practice Innovations •Comprehensive sustainability and climate planning•Building retrofitting•Transit innovations•Sustainable economic development•Community energy systems•Green infrastructure•Waste diversion•Water management
15 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Investing In Field Development
Dimension Description
What You Try to Accomplish
• Regional, national and international networks of practitioners and organizations that self-identify as part of a field.
• Clear differentiation of the practice field from other fields.
What You Invest In Research; intellectual frameworks; policy changes; practitioner networks; professional standards and best practices.
Typical Partners Think tanks; academics and thought leaders; policy players; national and international NGOs.
Time Horizon Multiple decades.
Key Skills Networking; thought leadership; research and analysis; debate and dialogue; intellectual synthesis.
16 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Some Lessons Learned
• Don’t mistake a “movement” for a “field”
• Field builders often play an important role in transcending the “competing guru” stage
• Many new fields exaggerate their claims (for impact) early on to gain legitimacy
• Many fields try to claim too much territory (“context inflation”) instead of acknowledging the real boundaries of their contributions
• If you push a field faster than it is ready to develop, you can actually slow it down
17 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Innovation Development
18 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Examples of Social Innovations
• Community Development Finance Institutions
• Early College High Schools• Community Colleges• Charter Schools• Program Related and Mission Related
Investments• Inclusionary Zoning• Co-Housing• Low Income Housing Tax Credits• Community Supported Agriculture• Career Readiness Credentials• Career Pathways• Unemployment Insurance
Social Innovations Can Be:
•Enterprise Designs•Products•Policies•Programs
19 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Criteria for “Scalable Social Innovations”
Significant performance improvements – Creates significant improvements (50%+) in key performance outcomes at a reduced cost.
Financially sustainability – Is based on an economic model that is sustainable on reliable and predictable revenue sources.
Scalable – Can be expanded using a common set of core systems that is not context-dependent.
Systems transformation potential – If implemented at scale, the innovation has the potential to contribute to the transformation of existing systems.
20 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Innovation Criteria Due Diligence Questions
Innovation Criteria Due Diligence Questions
Performance Improvement
• Is there evidence the innovation can create genuine, cost-effective improvements in performance over the current system?
• Are there clear metrics identified to measure these improvements? • Is it clear how the innovation will produce these performance improvements?
Scalable Operating Systems
• Is there a clear business design for the innovation?• Is there a well-defined “unit of production” that gets expanded in scaling?• Can the essence of the innovation be embedded in systems that can easily be
adopted and implemented by others?• Are there any significant barriers to scaling, such as highly specialized human capital
or unique sets of relationships?
Financial Sustainability
• Are the potential customers for the product/service clearly identified and is there a clear value proposition for each customer?
• Is there clarity about the costs of the innovation?• Are reliable long-term revenue sources identified and are these embedded in a clear
financial model for sustainability?• Is the front-end “risk capital” investment reasonable? How long is the ROI period?
Systems Change Potential
• Is there a clear hypothesis about how scaling of the innovation could contribute to a significant change the operations of current systems?
• Is this hypothesis realistic, and does the business strategy show how the required level of scale can be achieved?
21 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
The Innovation Management Process
1. Concept 3. Launch 4. Scaling Up
An defined innovation
hypothesis and concept, with an analysis of the
innovation opportunity and a written description
of the idea, including its
primary features and benefits.
A refined design for the innovation,
including strategic, customer, market,
technical, and financial analyses,
and a working prototype of the
product or service, with performance
characteristics verified by users.
Finished products or services, with established
pricing/costing; a marketing plan;
distribution systems; and necessary
support services. Development of a detailed business
plan for the innovation and
introduction of the innovation into
mainstream markets.
Spread of the innovation to
multiple locations and/or applications through franchising,
wholesale distribution, expansion,
intermediaries or other methods of
growth.
2. Design & Prototyping
22 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Criteria for Success At Each Stage
Stage Criteria for Success
Concept • Deep understanding of the system you are seeking to influence; access to “insiders” who know how the system actually works.
• A clear innovation hypothesis – a testable theory about how scalable and sustainable new performance outcomes can be achieved.
• An entrepreneur who is committed to the innovation vision.• The ability to clearly see untapped opportunities.• An ability to communicate the idea to others.
Design & Prototyping
• Opportunities for rapid prototyping at relatively small scales.• Technical/social competence that matches the level of sophistication is required to make the
innovation work.• Access to “lead users” who are willing to work with prototypes.• A willingness to significantly redesign the innovation if the prototypes don’t work – “learning while
doing.”• Patient investors who are willing to tolerate mistakes; redesign; and false starts.
Launch • A start up entrepreneur and management team.• Systems development capabilities.• Skills of strategy development; operational execution and excellence; culture building; and
organizational development.• Access to skilled team members.• Business planning and financial planning skills.• Launch capital.
Scaling • Scalable operating systems.• Distribution partners.• Clear scaling business models and economics.
23 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Investing In Innovation Development
Dimension Description
What You Try to Accomplish
• A portfolio of scalable innovations• A pipeline of new innovations under
development
What You Invest In • Sector scans and market research• The innovation development process• Organized innovation capacity
Typical Partners • Entrepreneurs• Innovation production networks• Entrepreneurial organizations
Time Horizon 5-10 years
Key Skills Market research; business planning and analysis; partner “deal making”; financial analysis; operating systems; venture investing
24 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Some Lessons Learned
• It is not a linear process
• It’s all about the entrepreneur and their team
• The entrepreneur needs business skills as well as social innovation insights
• It is hard to shift from making grants to investing in innovations
• Social innovation is very hard to do with public money and in public settings
• It is critical to know how much everything costs
• Too many entrepreneurs try to take innovations prematurely to scale
25 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Investing In Places (“Community Development
Philanthropy”)
26 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Developing Places
• Supporting systems change at the community level means building the capacity of a place to drive continuous innovation in its social and economic systems
• This requires the ability to assemble an “ensemble” of innovations and integrate them together in a place.
• Therefore, community innovation work is usually about importing and adapting innovations, not developing them.
27 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Community Innovation Infrastructure
Place-Based Transformation of
Community Systems
Innovation Management•Scanning•Development•Importing•System Integration
Social Innovation Investing
•Investor networks•Shared standards & practices•Capital continuum --(Angel; Seed; Growth; Operating)
Community Leadership•Commitment to social innovation•Facing the “brutal facts”•Setting priorities•Organizing resources•Changing the culture•Broad-based representation
Social Entrepreneurs•Social entrepreneur networks•Innovation brokers•Entrepreneur development•Entrepreneur attraction
28 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Infrastructure Varies By Sector
SECTOR Community Leadership
Social Entrepreneurs
Social Innovation Investing
Innovation Management
Systems
Education
Workforce Development
Health
Economic Development
Development Finance
Civic Engagement
Etc.
29 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Investing In Community Innovation
Dimension Description
What You Try to Accomplish
• Place-based capacity for continuous innovation
What You Invest In • Innovation brokers• Social capital networks• Community leadership capacity• Innovation “ensembles”
Typical Partners • Community organizations• Formal and informal leaders• Community foundations & local investors
Time Horizon 15-20 years
Key Skills Networking; listening; leadership development; opportunistic investing; expanding the ‘art of the possible’; innovation importing & adaptation
30 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Some Lessons Learned
• Requires high levels of flexibility and capacity to respond to unplanned opportunities
• You have to “meet the community where it is” – strategy will be inherently more “emergent” than “designed”
• Innovation brokers – informal networkers that span multiple networks – are critical
• Often requires investing in individuals, not organizations
• More about building social capital networks than individual innovations
• Serious change requires implementation of “families of innovations”
31 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Summary
32 • January 23, 2009 • © 2009 by Innovation Network for Communities. • www.in4c.net • All Rights Reserved.
Summary Comparison of Differences
Dimension Fields Innovations Places
What You Try to Accomplish
A clearly defined field that practitioners self-identify with.
A portfolio of scalable innovations & pipeline of opportunities
Place-based capacity for continuous innovation
What You Invest In
• Research & frameworks • Policy changes • Practitioner networks • Professional standards
• Sector scans• The innovation
development process• Organized innovation
capacity
• Innovation brokers• Social capital networks• Community leadership
capacity• Innovation “ensembles”
Typical Partners
• Think tanks & academics
• Policy players• National and
international NGOs
• Entrepreneurs• Innovation production
networks• Entrepreneurial
organizations
• CBOs• Leaders• Local funders
Time Horizon 10-30 years 5-10 years 15-20 years
Key Skills Networking; thought leadership; research and analysis; debate and dialogue; intellectual synthesis.
Market research; business planning; partner “deal making”; operating systems.
Networking; listening; leadership development; opportunistic investing; innovation importing and adaptation.