Post on 09-Jul-2020
transcript
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
FLORENCE PITAK, as Executrix for the Estate of JOHN PITAK. i Index No.: 109974/2000;and FLORENCE PITAK, Individually j 122204/1999
Plaintiff,
- against -
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.C and S., INC., et ah,
Defendants,
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
_, 2016
0WM
Hft l
Fiaiik Ouiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
<><c\
SO ORDERED,.
latitat B. HomfiaivAttorney for Defer,
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
3HomPe^^^MoultonTXS^Cv-G0
ItMlb NYSSUP« V1STJDJUN 01 2016
{V0323945.1}
Dices'
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
EILEEN DITULLIO, as Executrix for the Estate of VINCENT A.DITULLIO and EILEEN DITULLIO, Individually,
Plaintiff,
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah,
Defendants.
Index No.: 190228/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
^ , 2016
fL.mmH&-
WEITZ & LUXENBERG.P.cA^ ^700 BroadwayNew York, NY 100G& ,V(212) 558-5500 ^ ^
SO ORDERED, /7^—
;<?&
Laura B. Hollman,Attorney for DefenvamECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
- Hon ^eter H. Moulton, J.S.C.Uhli<* RECEIVED
NYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD
JUN 01 2016HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
{V0323880.1}
Vi
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F' L E DJUH 7 m
X
ROBERT W. LEAHY, Index No. 112943-04
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
(is- n« iCp
'X)
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
rr
ri n:;i T - :J
i
. I
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F l l- £ DC°UN^Q%o,ncs
X
PATRICIA A. LEAVY, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No. 109164-04KENNETH LEAVY and PATRICIA A. LEAVY, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
i ~~7 ~ I G
^ u.
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,„
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th Floof ~ ~
Newark, NJ 07102 ; „u
Hon. Peter H. Moultonu,
}
/
6
83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
GIOVANNA LUCENTE and JOSEPH LUCENTE, JR., index No.
F"- e0CO
JUHl 7 *°K
116165-04
-against-Plaintiff(s),
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYCBS CORPORATION, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
Cvs -n
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton/I
U.2 }
J83228690VI
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
Engine
LOUIS MATTIELLI and MARIE MACRE, as Co-Executors of Index No. 109544-04the Estate of Domenic Mattielli, and FANNIE MATTIELLI,Individually,
Plaintiff(s),-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
i^ ' ji
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd. r-One Newark Center- 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
/ a
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
DAVID C. NIEMCZYK,,
xNYCAL
x
F / L E DJW* 11 2016
COUNTNmfo%° oe
Index No. 100336-03
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
Qs. i'i.U
Charles Ferguson,Esq. ^Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
t*
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center-16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F / L B DJ W l 7 m
X
DORIEL EDWARDS, Index No. 105165-03
Plaintiff(s),100731-gX^
-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,et al., including NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYCBS CORPORATION, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
(\v n - i u
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 0710^_
/ u ,'
Hon. Peter H. Moulton 'W 0 5-V. ; /
-iij83228690V1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
F l L E DJUN J 7 2616
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
ALLEN E. BLANCHARD, as Administrator for theEstate of EVERETT A. BLANCHARD, and ALLEN E.BLANCHARD, as Executor for the Estate ofLUCY BLANCHARD,
Index No. 100085-03
Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
rt- ( (o
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 Broadway
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation
New York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
83228690v1
F I L E DJUN 17 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
CONNIE CURTIS, as Administratrix for the Estate of SALLYLAROSE,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.f includingCBS CORPORATION,
tNY«L %*<fc,
Index No. 19W7I/08*
%NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
r>c - i Co
f "N
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,TH Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center-16?1!FloorNewark,NJ 07102
v.
jysyiL ID //
82640541vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F I L E DJUN 17 2Q|6
COUNTY eu?flK'g ©taF,eeX
CALLO, DOMENICK, Index No. 100087-03
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.# includingCBS CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED,that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
to-
i\Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
T Hon. Peter H. MoultonG
83228690v1
F I L E DJUN 17 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK COUNTY SUBK'8 ©PFI6E
x NIWmmIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
MICHAEL D1GIROLOMO, Index No. 190089-12
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,New York
(Vs- rv ( C>
C:;
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.
Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102 rrr
~ri Hon. Peter H. Moulton
(i i2^ is
)/
- j
83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
ROBERT F. NUGENT,
-against-Plaintiff(s),
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
NYCAL
Index No.
%
100287-03*+% •%
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,New York
c' ’ •••
''- s :' - • / \
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.
Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
Hon. Peter H. Moulton/f" -
L .
JUH G 2 ZG1S
1i
/
83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
NYCAL
x
BRITT L. MORTON, Index No. 100083-03
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE; defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
ryvn. i^
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
SUZANNE LEITHNER,
-against-Plaintiff(s),
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
YCAL
Inv Mn
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
CJS- O.K?
f \
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.c Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102 /5'iTti "
m e s: A ,U)
: /o //
L I
- - J
83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
NYCALc%, %
x
ROSE MARIE NASSO, Individually and as Personal Representative index No.for the Estate of DOMENIC NASSO,
190181-^60^/V'cePlaintiffs,
-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation
(hereinafter "CBS") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant CBS with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant CBS be
and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
OlfOtfHsCynthia JSedgwick LLK
Attorneys for CBS Corporation, a Delawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Boulevard,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
-J
Hon. Peter M. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
NYCAL
X
ROSE MARIE NASSO,Individually and as Personal Representative index No. 190181-2009for the Estate of DOMENIC NASSO,
Plaintiffs,
-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
WHEREFORE,defendant Perkins Engines Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-
entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Perkins Engines Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Perkins Engines Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,New York 10003
SO ORDERED,
0l/C 2ji L
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Cynthia J. Cho, (E^q.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor Perkins Engines Inc.1085 Raymond Boulevard,16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
E>!(a jICo
j J^ C 2 ;: rj ; s
— 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to;
MICHAEL CULLEN, AS EXECUTOR FOR THEESTATE OF ARTHUR CULLEN, AND ALMACULLEN, INDIVIDUALLY
F't E oLA.S, Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 190075/12
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CerlainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212. dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant CerlainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposit ion thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, ail claims and cross claims against
defendant CerlainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: NewimuDZlJ
rk. New York. 2016
2-23U::;:::
Charles M, Ferguson. Esq.WEITZ & LUXEMBURG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York , NY 10003( 212 ) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavk& Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAYITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys ibr CertainTepd Corporation '
116 East 27m Street. \2lh FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
/J
SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter I F Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
LEONARD J. LUBNIEWSKI AND MARYLUBNIEWSKI
^4.JlJN 1 7
C°Ul\ITyc
£O
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) %Index No: 190378/2011 ^NO OPPOSITION SUMlV&fej-.JUDGMENT MOTION ANDWfeeR
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2016
b $M AEsq. QWft fLU KliUu
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yayitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12*FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
LEONARD J. LUBNIEWSKI AND MARYLUBNIEWSKI
%X*/j
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P. ) *4^. 4,Index No: 190378/2011 *NO OPPOSITION SUM]V&It%£,JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Lennox Industries Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Lennox Industries Inc., with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lennox Industries Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York/10a y^ , 2016
M 1M.1A jCfinrln M^crm/noV r ~ q j r » TT\1 [ 0f ( H c iWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavftz, Esq.
DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Lennox Industries Inc.,116 East 27th Street, 12l1' FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
JP/J)//(oSO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
HERMAN N. BRESSEL AND FRANCOISEBRESSEL
A,4% %
NYCAL >I.A.S. Part 50 *%-(Moulton, P.)Index No: 190112/10 ^NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
(“ Dana Companies” ) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkWla^ lS , 2016
P
.isish&rfOTisuirBpsui, Esq. llLW)ttv| Pft iUcLfsiWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavi/z, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Co tnpanies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, U LHon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NIKI PETRONE AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF ROSE M. PETRONE
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
°OUj^ U17
'Nry ZQl6
Index No: 118275/2002
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York£3 2016
Charles M. Fcrafeon;Esq.i D g i i\i aWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
' I /1
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
b j(0 f/ io
rsSO ORDERED,
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
NIKI PETRONE AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF ROSE M. PETRONE
ANYCAL cI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 118275/200Z Q
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY^JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation
(“ Dana Companies” ) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant
Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation (“ Dana Companies” ), with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation (“ Dana Companies” ), be and
the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York7 R 2016
V. A . , 1 /1 . I A\
f !
x
Gh esJ^EfilgWi^sq. L' O&Cit toWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. \DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.kb>hu>: j 1 ]SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
IMOGENE ARONE, as Personal Representative for theEstate of RALPH ARONE,
X
NYCAL
^ I L 5 o**i *»*SSBSs®***
rveut,Index No.: 190107/2009
Plaintiff(s),
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff
By:
^mwicl^lffll, Esq.
700 B\Wpway JNew York, New York 10003(212) 6(15-6200
Dated: New York,.New YorkS fz-H!'
SO ORDERED:
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC
By: . cs Gaurav K. Talwar, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, Fifth FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
"1
LH >|
yu/bHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X
F I L E DJUN 17 7016
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
XMADELINE ZACCHEO, as Administratrix for the :Estate of SALVATORE QUATTROCCHI, :
NYCALCOUNTY CLERK'® OPPIQE
NSW YORK
Index No.: 190240/2010
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,et al.Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York, New York
’n/ ylzjKoWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC
SuZ£
J \
Ratcliffe, Esq. Gaurav K. Talwar, Esq.
700 BroadwkyNew York, New York 10003(212) 605-6200
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
137 West 25th Street, Fifth FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
p-'--
- f
J
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
FBW39133/Legal/nosjm/NOVEMBER 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XTHOMAS O’CONNOR,
Plaintiff(s),
*'4C0(J>
JlJ/ y 17*0'Nry
?oie
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against- IndexNo,: 112730/00 &122202/99
A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.. NYCALI.A.S. Part^' SO
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz 8L Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003<\
GdikiCharles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDEREDVfc> w n
.! < ; 5
L5S — i
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- xIN RE NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:X
F"- e0J U N > r mC0U/V7YO
NYCAL ^yf^CeI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
Index No: 190108/11
Eithne Brennan, Individually and as Executrix of the Estateof Edmond Brennan,
Plaintiffs,against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER
Crane Co., et al.,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant Otis Elevator Company , hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Otis Elevator Company, with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant Otis Elevator Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
6 h l ( fc
Kevin Berry, Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer PAAttorneys for Plaintiff110 William StNew York, NY 10038
Efik DiMarco, Esq,
Gordon & Rees LLPAttorney for DefendantOtis Elevator Company1 Battery Park Plaza, 28th FloorNew York, NY 10005
SO ORDERED,.
^HON, PETER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.klkflk
NA/27633015V. I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S, Part 50(Moulton, P.)
m11 weCOUNTY Cl en
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 121982/99, 107864/00
LOUIS A. LIPA, JR.AND
DIANA LIPA NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York, New York
PV* , 2016
AttornlyTdM^intiffsLouis A. Lipa, Jr. and Diana LipaWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Kewyann-ML Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H, Moulton
Lie-
1-26037AS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CRESSER, BERNICE, et al
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WHITING CORPORATION, et al
Defendants.
-x NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)
- x
O '<Index No.: 113071/1998
\%
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTWHITING CORPORATION
-Xi
WHEREFORE, Defendant Whiting Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Whiting Corporation with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Whiting Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
New York, New York
Dated:
Adam S. DrckskfTA* 0£ CIXIO
WEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Zhanna A. LehrmanfEsq.
WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166D: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700 j
I U H o H O I S /CtVii /
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE
I, Shanna A. Lehrman, state that I am an attorney in good standing and admitted to
practice in the courts of the State of New York. On June 1, 2016, I served a copy of the
foregoing Defendant's Notice of No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order and No
Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order upon the following counsel:
1. Lindsay M. Decicco, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, LLP700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorney for Plaintiff
2. All Defense Counsel in the New York City Asbestos Litigation
I hereby affirm the foregoing statements to be true under the penalties of perjury.
Dated: June 1, 2016
New York, NY
WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166slehrman@winston.comD: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
- x NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITY I.A.S. Part 50
ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Moulton)x
This Document Relates to:
BIGAJ, LINDA, et al
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WHITING CORPORATION, et al
Defendants.
J^ l 7 ^ oC°uNryn 2016
Index No.: 115015/1998
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTWHITING CORPORATION
-X
WHEREFORE, Defendant Whiting Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against Defendant Whiting Corporation with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Defendant Whiting Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New York
Dated: $ /zJj jib
v) «asOCX
IWAtt700New
L & LUXENBERG;ys for Plaintiff3adway
Fork, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
“Shanna A. Lehrma]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166D: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700
i
on. Peter H. MoultonWN o i m
L:
AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE
I, Shanna A. Lehrman, state that I am an attorney in good standing and admitted to
practice in the courts of the State of New York. On June 1, 2016, I served a copy of the
foregoing Defendant's Notice of No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order and No
Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order upon the following counsel:
1. Jason Yampolsky, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, LLP700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorney for Plaintiff
2. All Defense Counsel in the New York City Asbestos Litigation
I hereby affirm the foregoing statements to be true under the penalties of perjury.
Dated: June 1, 2016
New York, NY
WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp,
200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166slehrman@winston.comD: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
— - XTn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION_ — X
This document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part ieT(Moulton, P)
Index No.: 112741/QJ> 106578/02114779/04
DAVID JOSEPH BARNES and TERRY L. BARNES,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant. — X_
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER
COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed
with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: ftUtj A , 2016Harrison, New York
jElTZ crre feNBERG^.C.IAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayMew York, New York 10003/2/12)558-5500(7SO ORDERED. — -Honorable Peter H, Moulton
°Oo, 1? oRussell S. Jamisbn, tisq.MARIN GOODMAN. LLP.Attorneys for Lr&JeipilatitKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck AvenueHarrison, New York 10528(914) 412-7300 •—I T
hjloflb \lU) I
I : .' 1'; - iv ’ ;:o !6
L!I:S
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates To:
ANTHONY J. DI MONTE and MARY DIMONTE,
Plaintiffs),
X00
X
sc
-<:x> 1
"f||—m
NYCAL 0fxleracar- 0
I.A.S. P a r t S'O ^Ion. Slitiii y Klein Ikiller)
-against-
A.C. and S. INC, (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et ah,
Index No.: 118569-98
NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: l l & l l f aNew York, New York
Wk^Than Alvara3han Alvarado, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
NAJLXA
-Hon. Sherry Klein Ilcitlcr
KiVsteh Alford Kneis, Esq.K<^L GATES LLP
tomeys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900
Li m s i mHON.PETERH.MOULTON
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
xNYCAL
CQI.A.S. Partpt^ S"0
*>/
ox
Index No. 190374/09
NO OPPOSITIONMARIO RIVADENEYRA SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, Defendant E, I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defcndants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant E. I du Pont de Nemours and Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.
Dan New York. NqwYorkJanuary 7, 2 0 1 5 /
Chris Romanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaititiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 681-1575
j -TA / '
-c . c/ / iDavid J . Goodearl, Esq.LEADER & BERKON LLPAttorneys far £, /. du Pont de Nemours and Company630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400
SO ORDERED,./44en. Sherry Klein -Heitto-HON.PETERH.MOULTON
JQated:: iijlal,Ik. m77
/j
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
MARGARET J. KOSIBA, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of RONALD Z.KOSIBA, INDEX NO. 126710-2002
Plaintiff , NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against- F I L E DA.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al., JUN 1 7 2016
Defendants. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant, DEERE & COMPANY, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, DEERE & COMPANY, with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, DEERE & COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500Attorneys for Plaintiff
666 Fifth Avenue, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10103(212) 753-5000Attorneys for Defendant, De&
SO ORDERED:
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CRESSER, HARRY, et al
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WHITING CORPORATION, et al
x NYCAL 0I.A.S. Part 50 %(Moulton)
x
Index No.: 112095/1998g£% r;a
NO OPPOSITION %SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTWHITING CORPORATION
Defendants. :--- X
WHEREFORE, Defendant Whiting Corporation hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Whiting Corporation with prejudice, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Whiting Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
New York, New York
Dated: 1 ,
MMAdam S^DuuLtjlcjf , Ejqr*
»v\ - OedfcdoWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
iSnanna A. Lehrman, Elsqf "7
WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166D: (212) 294-6607 xF: (212) 294-4700 j [p jj :,
I J ,JN 01 2016 IiN Y S S L
AFFIRMATION OF SERVICE
I, Shanna A. Lehrman, state that I am an attorney in good standing and admitted to
practice in the courts of the State of New York. On June 1, 2016, I served a copy of the
foregoing Defendant's Notice of No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order and No
Opposition Summary Judgment Motion and Order upon the following counsel:
1. Lindsay M. Decicco, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, LLP700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Attorney for Plaintiff
2. All Defense Counsel in the New York City Asbestos Litigation
I hereby affirm the foregoing statements to be true under the penalties of perjury.
Dated: June 1, 2016
New York, NY
WINSTON & STRAWN LLPAttorneys for Defendant Whiting Corp.
200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166slehrman@winston.comD: (212) 294-6607F: (212) 294-4700
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 113335/01
F I L E D-W J 7 2M5
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., with
prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York5" f 4 2016
tA\t 3Aa> &Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
Alysa Koloms, Esq.Attorney for DefendantSafeguard Industrial Equipment Co.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, .
Hon. Peter H. Moulton6/(o//C?
324-6295
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 113335/01,
u
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York£(( 4 2016
Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
r\K JKeri^aaoJ^Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantCourter & Company, Inc.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
SO ORDERED, .( Hon. Peter H. Moulton
(c
[ f ]i
I 0 1
~7/
f
1122-19132
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) - ' v
% \Index No.: 113335/01/^ %
NO OPPOSITION SUM1V&06V *JUDGMENT MOTION ANf)%DER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation, with prejudice in this action, and there
being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Treadwell Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkr ( ( t 2016
ERTT-ACORYTGUTAttorney for Plaintiffs C— ^Estate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTreadwell CorporationMCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
non. Peter H. Moulton
!T:?
i— ...
1235-18597
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ESTATE OF JOSEPH C. MCKENDRY
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 113335/01,
JUN 1 7 20)6
COUNTY eLWiOPFfGiNIWVDRSK
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York2016
i
fcfclL AGe> fe> (Attorney for PlaintiffsEstate of Joseph C. McKendryWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED, .
Hon. Peter hi. MouitorT
M. Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456
/6
J
2383-23573
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
LIONEL J. OSSE,Plaintiff(s),
X
0^ 1 1 20 ,6
mcAL couwvcIndex No.: 190052/2012
-against-
AERCO INTERNATIONAL, et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Georgia-Pacific LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Georgia-Pacific LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York, New York
jl (y
WEITZ &AUXENBERG, P.C. LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys fbr Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Georgia-Pacific LLC
Chris Romanelli, Esq. Kate H. Romick, Esq.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 605-6200
137 West 25th Street, Fifth FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED: y/6 . ;o
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This 'Document Relates to:
LUIGI GARRITANO and CESIRAGARRITANO
X\%cNYCAL ^I.A.S. Pari 50
(Moulton. P.)Index No: T 90.089/11
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide -Corporation hereby requests summary judgment ,
in the above“ entitled ease,, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against defendant 'Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,. all claims and. cross claims against ,
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York
fhoyo . 2Qi 6
w .
f
Charles NT Ferguson, Esq.VYEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York. NY 100381212 ) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavirz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVfTZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbine. Corporation116 East 27th Street, I 2lhlfborNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300 .
j
SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter H, Moulton
A
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
ROSE MARIE NASSO, Individually and as Personal Index No.Representative for the Estate of DOMENIC NASSO,
190181-200|?
Plaintiffs,
-against-NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al..
WHEREFORE, defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC hereby request summary judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant Foster Wheeler, LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant Foster
Wheeler, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
Weitz 8Attorne700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Cynthia J. Gtf o, Esq.Sedgwick£LPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler, LLC1085 Raymond Boulevard,16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
l
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No. 190304/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
F I L E DJUN 17 2016
COUNTY 0L8RKS OPPlCiNSW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant Perkins Engines, Inc. hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitledcase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs5 complaint against defendant PerkinsEngines, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant PerkinsEngines, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
MICHAEL GAGLIANO as Executor of the Estate ofCARYL R. GAGLIANO and MICHAEL GAGLIANOIndividually,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
BORG WARNER CORPORATION, et al., IncludingPerkins Engines, Inc.
Defendants.
Dated: New York, New YorkV
tULeDanny R. Kraft, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg P.C>-
Attomeys for Plaintiff700 Broadway---^New York^New York 10003
Shaun Bean, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for Perkins Engines, Inc.1085 Raymond BoulevardOne Newark Center — 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton n~si/ /VVS O ;
JUN E A Iv 2 / n -;b
83283471vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
\%
FRANK FERLITO, as Administrator for the Estate of FRANK index No. 190070/08FERLITO, and JOANNE DEMICHELE, a Executrix for theEstate of CONNIE FERLITO, Individually,
Plaintiffs), N0 OPPOSITION SUMMARY-against- JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
63 - t~i4 Cs>
/
IsCharles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.
Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16|^eoiu___
INewark, NJ 07102
C Hon. Peter H. Moulton
i/
I JUNQ 2 ? r! jgV
82640582vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
F"- e o
RITA BREITLAUCH, as Administratrix for the Estate of KURT index No. 190098-09BREITLAUCH, and RITA BREITLAUCH, Individually,
Plaintiffs),-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
CYV ( u
Charles Ferguson, Esq,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102 r--
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
6A//(, r*
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
FRANCESCO COSENTINO,
-against-Plaintiff(s),
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
NYCAL
Index No.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
- 1 C g
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,.k /b/fto
C Hon. Peter H. Moulton ' ' '• :
'
0
j83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
^ J L E DJUN 1 7 2016
C0UNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
LOUIS DOLAK,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., IncludingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.
Index No. 116022-07
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
OS' i^ f Co. . -V
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,.^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
&
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
p l LJUH l 7
COUNTY &
X
THERESA SLEVIN as Executrix for the Estate of JOHN J. Index No. 108924-04SLEVIN, and THERESA SLEVIN, Individually,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
&>- 1-7 - 1 U
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center-16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
SO ORDERED, & /h i/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
MARIE KAPETENAKIS, as the Administratrix of the Estate of index No.LILY PETRELIS,
F UJUN 1 7
COUNTY2016
115617-04
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
\~i - i^r.S J
Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloofNewark, NJ 07102 /
kyk//6n
J
/ '
J
83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
Co
ERNEST F. RISTO, Index No. 106524-04
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„includingCBS CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7 complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
\
j-'V
Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon, Peter H. Mou ton
' 2 . 3
83228690vl
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
F I L E DJlJN 1 7 2016
CORNELIUS COTTER as Personal Representative for the Index No. 107035-04Estate of MADELINE C. COTTER, and CORNELIUS COTTER,Individually,
Plaintiff(s),-against- MO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
as- n- iG
— w- /
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.Z
Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
C /£//£>Hon. Peter H. Moulton
83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F I L E D1 7 2016
COUNTY CLIHK’iOFFICENEWYOflK
DONALD P. DAILEY and KATHLEEN DAILEY,
X
Index No. 116294-04
-against-Plaintiff(s),
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYCBS CORPORATION, JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation,a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,New York
n< 1C
• w ~ {Charles Ferguson,Esq. 'Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
1Dennis E. Vega,Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
SO ORDERED, 2.Hon. Peter H. Moulton
f
J83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F I L E DJUN I 7 2016
x
MICHAEL H. DESANTIS, Index No. 109921-04
-against-Plaintiffs),
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
OS> - ( -7 ,- ( Cs.
\ , >Charles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
y/6
J83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016
COUNTY CLIRK'S ©PPlGiNEW YORKX
DIANGELO,NEIL A., Index No. 112944-04
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingCBS CORPORATION,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
- ri. (c.Xr;/ - i
X
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED.£
Hon. Peter H. Moulton^ i d
j83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016
COUNTS CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
JOHN J. DOHERTY and KATHLEEN DOHERTY,
Plaintiffs,•against-
A.C. & S. INC., et al., including CBS CORPORATION, a DelawareCorporation, f/k/a VIACOM INC. successor by merger to CBSCorporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation,
Index Nos. 111230-01;123065-01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation
{hereinafter "Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantWestinghouse with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, ail claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkOs.n. ( Csrp*-
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff (s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-9536
SO ORDERED,
MichaelW. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation> a Delawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
CAROLINE FLEMING, as Administratrix for the Estate of Index No.QUINTINA CHECO,
F I L E0JUN 1
«-aar*190106-11
Plaintiff(s), N0 OPPOSITION SUMMARY-against- JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O.SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al., includingCBS CORPOATION, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a VIACOMINC. successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a PennsylvaniaCorporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor bymerger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation
(hereinafter "Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to
Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant
Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
New York, New York fn ;Dated:
Charles Ferguson,Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-9536
SO ORDERED,.
Micnael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for CBS Corporation, a Delawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16thFloorNewark,NJ 07102
Hon. Peter H. Moulton f /h}
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xNYCAL
JUN 1 7 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
x2doo
EDWARD MURRAY and MELANIE L. MURRAY, Index No. -3301052011:
Plaintiffs,
-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.C.&S. INC. et al.,
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantWestinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated * Mou/ Vnrl/ Matir Vi-irU
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 Broadway
Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneys for CBS Corporation, a DeIawarecorporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by mergerto CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
New York, New York 10003-9563
O Hon. Peter H. Moulton
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 17
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL rOUNTY CLJRK1® 0FFIG6^ NEW YORK
X
SYLVIA BRADOR PENA as Personal Representative for the index No. 117056-04Estate of CARLOS BRADOR CASTILLO,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation,a Delaware corporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Os - vl - ( Cp
Charles Ferguson, Esq. \Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
\
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
83228690V1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
F I L E DJUNI7 m
COUNn CLERK'S OFFICENew YORK CE
X
BOBRA WHITE FERGUSON, Individually and as Index No. 190110-09Administratrix for the Estate of BERT THOMAS FERGUSON,
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York,New York
oS- ( 0?
^ JCharles Ferguson,Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th.FloorNewark,NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,7A
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
f<L^AjL/A>
83228690v1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL
x
LYNNE STACK as Proposed Administratrix for the Estate of index No.PAUL STACK and LYNNE STACK, Individually,
F I L E D1 7 2016
COUNTY ClgRKg OFFlCPNEW YORK ' E
100340-03
Plaintiff(s),-against-
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYA.O SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., including JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERCBS CORPORATION,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE,defendant CBS Corporation, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc., successor by
merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation,f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter
"Westinghouse") hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice
Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Westinghouse with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Westinghouse be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York,New York
to- n < ICP
Charles Ferguson,Esq. "Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Sedgwick LLPAttorneysfor CBS Corporation1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center -16th FloorNewark,NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
j
J83228690v1
i !
!!! :
1
CLB'568 l2/iega!/nosjm/MAV 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XGEORGE J. CORNISH, JR„
E DJtJ« I 7 2016
C0UN z°
Plaintiff(s),
-againsT
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aL
Defendant(s) ,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 190268/09
NYCAL ^I.A.S. Part 3/0 O'O
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
L>Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
ShawnetteTTbftf. Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, lo/Uluii. SlicTiyitleiii-IIeitlar
H0N PEfER H.MOULTON
g/6/
nJhl Q 2
F I L E DX: FB H /32500/dismissaIs/nosim/September 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XALICE M. PETERSON, Individually and asAdministratrix of the Estate of HOWARD PETERSON,
Plaintiff(s),
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et ah;
Defendants. — xWHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
JUN 1UQ16
COUNTV CLERK'S OWC6C NEW YORK
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
Index No.: 100976/98
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
QUJM Wgt^Esq .Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,/Hon. Peter Moulton
h/ L/jJ^^ J -
J U N 0 2 2016: " " f. n' r . Cr j f-J - CIVIL
A:CLB/60052./disniissaIs/nosjnt/SEPTEMBER2015F I L E D
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-X
JUN 1 7 2016COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUE ANNE MORRIS, as Administratrix for the Estate of NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYRICHARD E. MORRIS, JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDERPlaintiff(s),
- against - Index No.: 112359/00
A.C. & S. INC., et ah; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
Defendants.•X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
F I L E DX:FBW/40r74.Mismissak/nosim/SEPTEMBER2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XSUE ANNE MORRIS, as Administratrix for the Estate of NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYRICHARD E. MORRIS, JUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
JUN 1 7 2QI6
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Plaintiff(s),
- against - Index No.: 112359/00
A..C. & S. INC., et al.; NYCAL
Defendants.X
I.A.S. Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
K , Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,1n
Hon. Peter Moulton
io rc
Lr.JUN 0 2 2016
PACT 50- CIVIL
!
i'
M;!
CLBjASI 8/iegal/nosjm/MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XANDREW KUTKO, JR„
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et aL
Defendant(s),
F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORKNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 190020/10
NYCAL^ ST AI.A.S. Paiyo b o
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
.f
tShawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,Sherry Klein Heitlcr
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
fa(a w
q2
: '
i!
! i
CLB56814/leeal/nosjm/MA Y 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK— - XTHOMAS KOWALSKI,
F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
Plaintiffs),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Index No.: 190337/09
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et aL
Defendant(s),
NYCALI.A.S. PartjJO
-X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS. INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
tomey for PlaintiffFrank Ortl!Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
— T 4Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,J£w*rShui) Klcili-Heider
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
yy ,yJUN G 2 2016
L-ZZj CH
3:.‘r ”
*"T - CIVIL
i
i
hr3 -' t r'
;;
ii
i i
I !
F I L E DJUN 17 2016
CLB56S15/leeal/nosjm/MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XMELVYN MECKEL,
Plaintiffs),
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against- Index No, ; 190411/09
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et ah, NYCAL_
I.A.S. Part yf 0Defendant(s),
- -X
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
: :
!!
!!
E1
i .
ii
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
FranPTjrtiz. Es^Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Shawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York. New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, f£/%(oHem rrv Klein Hcitter
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
F I L E D
:i
; i
CLB5,6824/legal/nosjm,MAY 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
CHARLES fi. MORIARTY,-X
Plaintiffs),
JUN 1 7 2016COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against- IndexNo.: 117523/99 &4141s$m-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendant(s),X
NYCAL ,I.A.S. Part^ef ^O
WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary
I judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,i f
i dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC, with prejudice,
I and there being no opposition thereto,
! ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
jj defendants CLEAVER BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
i: iii
without costs.
ojjX /O'jrikOrtiz^ Esq. ,,A *imey for Plaintiff
Frank Ortiz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz 8L Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
L>tShawnette Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER BROOKS, INC.Barry' McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED.B&n. Sherry Klcill-Hemef—
HON.PETERH.MOULTON
SUPREME COURT OF TEE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
FLORENCE PITAK, as Executrix for the Estate of JOHN PITAK.and FLORENCE PITAK, Individually
- against -
A.C and S., INC., et al.,
Plaintiff,
C0(jj
Defendants.o
Index No.: 109974/2000;122204/1999
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTiyOTION AND ORDER
NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
2016y/z?
Fiaiik Ox Liz, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
^aura^B. HomnanyEsqYAttorney for DefendantECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED, Din^on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
{V0323945.1}
H i r n T
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:x
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
FRANCES A. BARRIO, as Executrix for theEstate of EDWARD S. BARRIO, and FRANCESA. BARRIO, Individually,
Index No. 02/11315302/107221
Plaintiff
-against-
NATIONAL GRIDNATIONAL GRID
4J(Jty j
Co^£O
7 2Qw NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New .York2J±t£_, 201L
MMg|Esq.mfen LLPifendantGENERATION LLC
Ma feitysr Esq JoSor\w pWEimZV SJ LUXENBERG, P.C.Atnoiuadys for Plaintiffs100\Btt<fadwayNew rcark, NY 10003(212) p58-5500
6 ib
John J. FCullen aAttorneyNATIONAL44 Wall :New York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
i :
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK— xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGAnON :
This Document Relates To:-x
ROSERITA SCHRETTNER, as Executrix for theEstate of ALFRED F. SCHRETTNER andROSERTTA SCHRETTNER, Individually,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
Plaintiffs)vs.
A C & S, INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY), et aL,
FI Le i: JUN 1 7 2016
115622/01
Defendants).COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
-X NEW YORKWHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
\!
:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and :without costs.Dated: New York,New York
2016
By: Prank M. Qifeis Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Counsel for:Plaintiffs
By: AdamL. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016
1T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
SO ORDERED: ,t HON. PETER H. MOULTON&
/j ,s® e 3
L 6 ;
J
V\i l
1
(01813560JX)CX }
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
I
Index No.: 190228/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
b NYCALI.A.S Part 50
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
EILEEN DITULLIO, as Executrix for the Estate of VINCENT A.DITULLIO and EILEEN DITULLIO, Individually,
Plaintiff,
- against - ^A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., J( j/\i i ,Co/
72016DefenaMV yo - i
WHEREFORE, Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, hereby requests
summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant A. O. Smith Water Products Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
y/t°j 2016
/LmmWEITZ & LUXENBERG,P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Laura B. Hollman,Attorney for DefenaetmECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank StreetWhite Plains,New York 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED, .HomPeter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
{V0323880.1}
0oS7 ci
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
X
X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)
Index No.: 190028/11Robert Polotaye and Sandra Polotay^Plaintiff(s),# t
- against - %» J^OOPPOSITIONsifi^IARY JUDGMENT
*?gn. MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al./C/*
®
Defendants.X
I
WHEREFORE, defendant HOWDEN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
i/s/h/a HOWDEN BUFFALO, INC., Individually and as Successor in
Interest to FB Sturtevant, The Howden Buffalo Group and Buffalo
Fan, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant HOWDEN NORTH
AMERICA, INC. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all
claims and cross claims against defendant HOWDEN NORTH AMERICA,
INC. be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dat^d: New York, New YorkL I7 , 2016
Cj/yl l/>Weitz &
Esq.Luxenberg, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)Robert Polotaye700 BoradwayNew York, New York 10003
"efhrey Fegan, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLP
forneys for DefendantHowden North America, Inc.44 Wall StreetNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000Our File No.: 1123,1^111
Hon. Peter H.
_Jp//0jMoulton, J.S.C. /
/ /(
JU!y Q $
Lffl/5 /
;
So Ordered:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
xTHIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
DAVID JOSEPH BARNES and TERRY L. BARNES,
Plaintiff(dN •
against * LfQJ( , NO
17m
Index No.: 04/11477902/11274102/106578
NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/h/aNATIONAL GRID, et al., BOUNTYGig
OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendantsx
WHEREFORE, defendant, NATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC d/b/a NATIONAL
GRID ("NATIONAL GRID"), sued herein as KEYSPAN GENERATION LLC f/k/a
LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,
dismissing plaintiff's complaint against defendant NATIONAL GRID with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and
cross claims against defendant NATIONAL GRID be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York ew York/Hy U, 201 fo
John J.I Fanning, Esq.Cullen VpidyCykman LLPAttorne^For DefendantNATIONAL GRID GENERATION LLC44 Wall StreetNew York, NY 10005(212)732-2000
SO ORDERED,
& LUXENBERG*P.C.WEDTE & LUXENBERG,
AttlpAneys for Plai10O^BroadwayNewark, NY 10003
Plaintiffs
(212 558-5500
min** Hon. Peter H. Moulton
1
-SJ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
xNYCALI.A.S. Part £->(Moulton, ,£)
Index No. 190366/2011
NO OPPOSITION
JOHN A. ATTANASIO, DECD
JUN 17 mi
WHEREFORE, Defendant Imo Industries Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against defendant Imo Industries Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
COUNTY Cl gi
NEW YORKsmbmc
£. SUMMARY JUDGMENTr|L pMgWION AND ORDER
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant Imo Industries Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts.
Dated: New York, New YorkApriEM; 2016
2_V 2
IAlt700
1-& LUXENBERG, P.C.
ys for Plaintiffsladway
New W>rk, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
poh JCLJ David J. GoodeaiT, Esq.LEADER &^ERKON LLPAttorneys for Imo Industries Inc.630 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10017(212) 486-2400
SO ORDEREDHon. Peter H. Moulton
Dated:: Info / lbJ
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X
This document relates to:
WESTON REED
F4-L~E~E> X
JUN 1 7 £016 ;COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE :
NEW YORK :.X
NYCALI. A. S. Pari 50(Moulton,$Index No,: 104333/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
WHEREAS, Defendant PFIZER, INC. (“ PFIZER” ) requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled ease, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
Plaintiffs complaint against PFIZER, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it
is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
PFIZER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated:New York, New YorkSeptember-— — 2015“
Nicholas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff
^ficolollpcncc, Esq. 1
Renzulli Law Firm, LLP300 East 42nd Street17th FloorNew York, New York 10017Counsel for Pfizer, Inc.
SO ORDERED.Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 117884/00
-XRONALD RESUA AND SUSAN RESUA,
-against-Plaintiff(s),
E*| NOC
' L E W?
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTM§TION AND ORDER
A.C. & S, INC., et al„
?on. Peter H. MoultonX
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, A.W. Chesterton Company, be and tire same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED,
^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
m o 8 I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
xMARGARET C. LARSEN, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of STANLEY CORNELIUSLARSEN, deceased.
-against-Plaintiff(s),
Index No,: 190087/12F * L E D
JUH 1 7 2016
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.W. CHESTERTON, et al.
Defendants.x
Haa, Sherry Klein I Kilter
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-
entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
l lup
M l3Jordan C. Fox, EsqfBELLUCK £ FOKf, 1Attorneys fon Plaittif546 Fifth Ava, 4/ Flok&/New York, NY*"!0036
John Mi/Guerriero, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SO ORDERED, blion. Sherry ICleiirHcitlar
HON.PETERH.MOULTON It ~!
f • ' W Cl: , / ' 3
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI. A, S. Part 50(Moulton,|?)
This document relates to:
HENRY DAWSON NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
Index No.: 113467/98
WHEREAS, Defendant PFIZER, INC. (“ PFIZER” ) requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
Plaintiffs complaint against PFIZER, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it
is hereby
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
PFIZER, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkJL U1 IV, l VIIV
^September 2015 - J?
NMmlarNovack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th Floor
co < vA^NfcSfe penee, Esq.Renzulli Law Firm, LLP300 East 42nd Street17th FloorNew York, New York 10017Counsel for Pfizer, Inc.
New York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff
{00366628.DOCX}
1/
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
INNOCENZO OSTACOLI;GREALD ATWOOD;RONALD ELLIOTT;ALONZO HAMILTON;ALLAN R. KACHUK;WLTER H. KEILICH;RICHARD T. KELLY;KENNETH KILGANNON;ROBERT KOJALO;AUGUSTINE P, MASSELLO;ROCCO MASTROCOLA;JAMES E. MCCANDLESS;JOHN MCGANN;KENNETH MEYEROWITZ;RICHARD WARDROP;
Plaintiffs,
NYCALI.A.S, Part 50(Moulton, pIndex No. 111621/2002
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
*-against-
A.C. &S., INC., formerly ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING andSUPPLY, INC.,etal.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant PFIZER INC, hereby requests summary judgment against plaintiff
AUGUSTINE MASSELLO in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against defendant PFIZER INC. only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant PFIZER
INC.only be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Traced p>pn \ n » ZQKQ
^AndreiGrous, Esq. * "''— Carol Tempesta,'Esq~“ V'WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER
Irew Grous, Esq,
Wall Street Plaza88 Pine StreetNew York, NY 10005Attorneys for PlaintiffAugustine Massello
larol Tempesta,Esq.RENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains, NY 10601Attorneys for DefendantPfizer Inc.
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J,S,C.
C . ; 5
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE:NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X
-X
NYCALI.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, f.)
RUTH MORACE,as Administratrix for the Esfe of I g-*» IadexNo. 120765-1997RAYMOND MORACE, Individually, L» C U 105234-1998
111036-1998Plaintiff; JUN 1 7 2016 113279-2000
-against- COUNTY CLERK'S OF^f&fP OSITTON SUMMARYNEW YORK JUDGMENT MOTION AND
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & ORDERSUPPLY),etal.
Defendants. -X
WHEREFORE,defendantPFIZER INC.hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to C.P.L.R. Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against
defendant PFIZER INC.only with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against
defendant PFIZERTNC. onhf be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
cos ' litd
."OIAJIIH 7- U)r.|(,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003Telephone: (212) 558-5580Facsimile: (212) 344-5461Attorneys for PlaintiffEstate of Raymond Morace
Nicole A.SpenceRENZULLI LAW FIRM, LLP81 Main Street, Suite 508White Plains,NY 10601Telephone: (914) 285-0700
' Facsimile: (914) 285-1213Attorneys for DefendantPfizer, Inc,
SOORD:EREDf__^Hrm THon.Peter H. MoultonhlS/ f b
r-
jJ
!
J
J
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
F l L B oIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN RICHARD SAWYER ANDMARGARET H. SAWYER
NYCAL ^ 1 1 £816I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No: 104204/99NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
UNT?cm$Niwfommes
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Dana Companies,
LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC, formerly known as Dana Corporation, be and the same are
hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkS /23 & , 2016
JM' filAU^nasayM.Decicc^ Esq. Judith A. Ya>lqtz^sq.EITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER ERRANTE YA^
LiniWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Judith A. Ya^itz^Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAtlTZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016 1(212) 452-5300
i
Hcfn. Peter H. MoultonilSL/Co I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MIREYA RIVADENEYRA, AS ADMINISTRATRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF MARIO RIVADEYRA, ANDMIREYA RIVADENEYRA, INDIVIDUALLY
F I L E DNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
m 17 mC°UNTY GLmmNIW vomOPPlG1
Index No: 190374/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York/ / / . 2016
LAAh>In M F°rnin *" 11nr] — »WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CTAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10038(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavifz^E^.
| DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP('Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation
116 East 27th Street, 12th FlohrNew York, NY 10016 [(212) 452-5300 (
SO ORDERED,
1
^/flon. Peter H. Moulton
U~9JAOxt V J
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JU(N||7 2g]gIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CAROL J. RIEGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ASEXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM K.RIEGER
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
COUNTY CLiWiOWgiNIWYQBK
Index No: 113324/01
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkrtirujj 25 , 2016
mm'iLindsay Deciccd, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yd^it5/ Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
1 '
iSO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton 3 , ]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
KATHLEEN P. KEOGH, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of JAMES W. KEOGH
Ju^ Um
Index No. 119892/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATED:
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
,2016
\
Sam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,
' Hon. Peter H. Moulton
NYS SUPREME CT<ML-1ST jD
JUN 13-2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
^ I L E DJ {JN 17 ?M
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
KATHLEEN P. KEOGH, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of JAMES W. KEOGH
Index No. 119892/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: ,2016
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Sam VTRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
NYS SUPREME C cfvn.-iSTJD
JUN 1 3-20(6
J&S&BSS?
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
!
GENE SPINELLI and JOAN SPINELLI,
Plaintiffs,
- against -A.L. EASTMOND & SONS, Individually and as
Successor to Easco Boiler Corp., et al.
Defendants.
New York City Asbestos Litigation
Index No.: 190488/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant RJELLO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. herebyrequests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissingPlaintiffs Complaint against Defendant RIELLO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
F 1 LJ U N t t *0'6
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-derendams all claims and cross-claims againstDefendant RIELLO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, INC. be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated; New York, New York
, 20
BELLUCK & FOX LLP546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Attorneys \'<fx laintifT
Jordan F sq.
THE REINARTZ LAW FIRM, LLCCourt Plaza South- West Wing21 Main Street, Suite 205Hackensack, NJ 07601Attorneys for DefendantRiello Corporation of America, Inc.
By : ~LRichard A. R&na^CEsqJ
SO ORDERED,
Hon.Teter H. MoultonLS 08 2DI6
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JlJN 17 2016
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 121825/01
EARL W. VAN TASSELL and ROSE MARIE VANTASSELL
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATED
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SarfrV. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
EARL W. VAN TASSELL and ROSE MARIE VANTASSELL
JlJH xj
Index No. 121825/01
jUH\1
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
§MCE fol^hferebyWHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE mb., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: IMM ,2016
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SaftrrV. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,C Hon. Peter H. Moulton y /y / Co
rYssupR^w^lI JUN 1 fZgjg I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F \ LE0
JUKII ®6
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
RONALD RESUA and SUSAN RESUAIndex No. 117884/00
110182/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATE
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SamV/^trggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,
NYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD
JUN 13 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
JUN 1 7 2016COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
RONALD RESUA and SUSAN RESUAIndex No. 117884/00
110182/00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATEI
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Sam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,
RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD
JUN 1ff*Q16HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
MH 1 7 2016
NEW YORKTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
DANIEL P. POLAKIndex No. 104431/97
109676/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: ^ ,2016
Attorneys for Plaintiff Sam V. KuggeriWeitz & Luxenberg Attorneys for De700 Broadway - 7th floor BMCE Inc.
New York, NY 10003 Marshall, Denne
Sam V. KuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
JUN 17 2016
COUNTY OJW8 OFFICENEW YORK
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 118275/02
NIKI PETRONE as Proposed Executrix for the Estate ofROSE M. PETRONE
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATED: tYhw) VS ,2016
Attorneys for plaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SamVTRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,c Hon. Peter H. Moulton
NYS SUPREMEjPREMecr-avinsTJD
JUN 18? 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
J U t s i l 7C0UNTycLmi
£Ql§
Gg
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
NIKI PETRONE as Proposed Executrix for the Estate ofROSE M. PETRONE
Index No. 118275/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: 2-3 ,2016
YS4MJ.Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
Sam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
W/y IkHon. Peter H. Moulton
NYS SUPREMEECCTVaviL-isT JD
HOIAl
JUN 13' 2016
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
F I L E DJUN 1 7 2016
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 107745/99
CATHLEEN MARIE HEWITT BIGGS, AS EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES C. HEWITT
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATED:
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Sam \7TRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,
RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD
JUN 13 2016HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Jw 1 7 mCENEW YORK
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 107745/99
CATHLEEN MARIE HEWITT BIGGS, AS EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES C. HEWITT
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in theabove entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATE ,2016
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Cam V. RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,
^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1ST JD
JUN 13 2016HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
BARBARA A. PINE, and LISA J. POIRER, as Co-Executrices for the Estates of HAGOP KEVORKHAGOPIAN, and ALICE C. HAGOPIAN
F I L E DJlJN 17 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OPf?jegNEW YORK
Index No. 122168/98
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: ftf /lb ,2016
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Sam Vfc faggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
RECEIVEDNYS SUPREME CT-CIVIL-1STJD
JUN 132016HON. PETER H. MOULTONADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK F I L E DIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION JUN 17 2016
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
CONNIE CIFFA, as Executrix for the Estate of JOSEPHPAUL CIFFA, and CONNIE CIFFA, Individually
Index No. 109694/02105876/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, BMCE Inc. , hereby requests summary judgment in the
above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, BMCE Inc., with prejudice in this action, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant BMCE Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DA
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
Saro^VTRuggeriAttorneys for DefendantBMCE Inc.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
SO ORDERED,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK P \ L£°IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
CONNIE CIFFA, as Executrix for the Estate of JOSEPHPAUL CIFFA, and CONNIE CIFFA, Individually
Index No. 109694/02105876/02
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Lockheed Martin Corp., with prejudice in this action,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Lockheed Martin Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATED:
SarrfOT RuggeriAttorneys for DefendantLockheed Martin Corp.Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin105 Maxess Road, Suite 303Melville, NY 11747
Attorneys for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway - 7th floorNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton