Post on 10-Feb-2016
description
transcript
CLASSIFICATION (U)
GATE 6 SUFFICIENCY REVIEW (Sustainment)
Program Manager Name
Review Date
PROGRAM NAME
The PEO/PM is responsible for ensuring that all files are properly marked with the correct classifications in accordance with SECNAV M-5510.36.
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Key Performance Parameters
Program Requirements
PARAMETER STATUS
Improving Constant Degrading
Legend
Meets Objective
Meets Threshold
Below Threshold
KPP Threshold Performance Objective Status/Basis
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Basis Legend
E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Program Requirements
PARAMETER STATUS
Legend
Meets Objective
Meets Threshold
Below Threshold
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
KSAs / Other Attributes
KSA Status/Basis Other Attribute Status/
Basis
E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Program Resources
BUDGET AND PLANNINGProgram Funding & Quantities
($ in Millions / Then Year)Prior Years
Current Year
FYDP Yr 1
FYDP Yr 2
FYDP Yr 3
FYDP Yr 4
FYDP Yr 5
FYDP Yr 6
FYDP Yr 1- 6 To Comp Total
RDT&ECurrent $ (PB 08) 5.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 31.0 10.0 47.0Required $ 0.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 18.0 9.0 28.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 5.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 1.0 19.0
PROCUREMENTCurrent $ (PB 08) 5.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 31.0 10.0 47.0Required $ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 9.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 5.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 31.0 1.0 38.0
O&MCurrent $ (PB 08) 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 43.0 5.0 53.0Required $ 1.0 3.0 5.0 2.0 9.0 2.0 6.0 6.0 30.0 2.0 36.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 1.0 0.0 (1.0) 3.0 (2.0) 6.0 3.0 4.0 13.0 3.0 17.0
MPCurrent $ (PB 08) 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 55.0 15.0 79.0Required $ 5.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 11.0 14.0 12.0 14.0 57.0 17.0 85.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) (1.0) (1.0) 6.0 1.0 (2.0) (4.0) (1.0) (2.0) (2.0) (2.0) (6.0)
MILCONCurrent $ (PB 08) 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 43.0 20.0 68.0Required $ 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 33.0 15.0 55.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10.0 5.0 13.0
TOTALCurrent $ (PB 08) 18.0 13.0 18.0 23.0 33.0 38.0 43.0 48.0 203.0 60.0 294.0Required $ 9.0 14.0 12.0 16.0 26.0 24.0 28.0 32.0 138.0 52.0 213.0 Delta $ (Current - Required) 9.0 (1.0) 6.0 7.0 7.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 65.0 8.0 81.0TOC Objective $ 17.5 13.2 17.0 21.2 31.8 35.5 40.0 44.8 190.3 49.0 270.0 Delta $ (TOC Objective - Current) (0.5) 0.2 (1.0) (1.8) (1.2) (2.5) (3.0) (3.2) (12.7) (11.0) (24.0)
QUANTITIESCurrent (PB 08) 31 25 34 43 61 70 79 88 375.0 0 431Required Qty 18 27 22 30 50 45 52 59 258.0 0 303 Delta Qty (Current - Required) 13 (2) 12 13 11 25 27 29 117 0 128
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Program Resources
Obligations and Expenditures
BUDGET AND PLANNING
Legend
Greater than or equal to
benchmark
1% to <10% below the
benchmark
Greater than 10% below benchmark
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Appropriation Cateogry Obligation Expenditure Obligation Expenditure Obligation ExpenditureO&M 100% ---- N/A ---- N/A ----RDT&E 80% 55% 100% 90% N/A ----Procurement 80% ---- 96% ---- 100% ----Advance Proc 100% ---- N/A ---- N/A ----
First Year AvailableCumulative Second Year
AvailableCumulative Third Year
Available
Not Applicable
FY07 OBL/EXP FY08 OBL/EXP FY09 OBL/EXP
RDT&ENOPNSCN/APNWPNO&M, N/MCMPNMILCONPANMCPMC
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Program Resources
MANNINGStaffing Adequacy
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Legend
Not Applicable Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Contractor Support ServicesMilitary Civilian
OverallProgram Management Y G R G G G G G G G G G G G G Y G G
Engineering Y G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
Logistics G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
Test and Evaluation G G G R G G G G G G R G G G G G G G
Contract Management G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
Financial Management G G G G G G G G G Y G G G G G R G G
Cost Analysis G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
Depots / Centers G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
Capability / Resources G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G GY G G G
# of Staff Skill of StaffPrevious Current Future Previous Current Future
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Program Resources
MANNING
Staffing Adequacy
SUBSYSTEM IPT LEADERS / PROJECT MANAGERS
O-5/6 / PAYBAND III
NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT ELEMENT
NOTE: BREAKOUT BY MAJOR PRODUCT COMPONENT’S SUBSYSTEM ELEMENTS
MAY BE ALIGNED WITH PROGRAM OFFICE OR OTHER COMPETENCIES
PAPM / TOC Reduction MANAGER
PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD T&E
PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD BFM
PROGRAM MANAGERDEPUTY PROGRAM MANAGER
ALIGNED WITH OTHER COMPETENCIES AND ASSIGNED FULL TIME TO PROGRAM OFFICE
PAPM / IPT LEADER OF
MAJOR PRODUCT “X”
PAPM / IPT LEADER OF
MAJOR PRODUCT “Y”
PAPM / IPT LEADER OF
MAJOR PRODUCT “N”
. . . . .
. . . . .
FUNCTIONAL LEAD SE
FUNCTIONAL LEAD COST
FUNCTIONAL LEAD CONT
FUNCTIONAL LEAD LEGAL
PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEMIPT LEADER
PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEMIPT LEADER
PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEMIPT LEADER
PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEMIPT LEADER
PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEMIPT LEADER
PROJECT MGR / SUBSYSTEMIPT LEADER
COMMON ACROSS ALL SYSCOMS
SUB-PRODUCT LEVEL POSITIONS
POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE PROGRAM OFFICE (PO)POSITIONS ALIGNED TO THE FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCY AND ASSIGNED TO THE POPOSITIONS THAT ARE EITHER
POSITIONS THAT ARE MISSION FUNDED
POSITIONS THAT CAN BE MISSION FUNDED OR WCF
“CO
RE”
PR
OG
RA
M O
FFIC
E“S
UB
-PR
OD
UC
T” L
EVEL
“CORE” FUNCTIONS
REPORTING ALIGNMENT
FUNDING ALIGNMENT MODEL
Program Management Office Framework
PAPM / FUNCTIONAL LEAD LOG
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
TOTAL OWNERSHIP COST ESTIMATING
Event Rating RationalePost-IOC/FDD cost estimates and the projection of the TOC Objective versus SCP baseline are substantiated by assessed fielded systems performance, operations, and sustainment related expenditure to date.
Post-IOC/FDD Cost Estimating
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Program Planning / Execution
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
T&E Item Rating RationaleMajor deficiencies identified in IOT&E and/or FOT&E reports are available for review.
Approved Test Plans for correction of deficiencies and/or system modifications are aligned with deployment and sustainment strategies and schedules.
TEST AND EVALUATIONProgram Planning / Execution
Test and Evaluation Status
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
TEST AND EVALUATION
Note: This slide should be used to report on Operational Test Agency (OTA) findings of deficiency. If all deficiencies are resolved, delete this slide.
Program Planning / Execution
Deficiency Rating/Basis Rationale
Vehicle failed to meet Radar Detection Range Threshold
Single Engine Acceleration below threshold
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Status of Major T&E Deficiencies
E = Estimated | C = Calculated T = Test Data | L = Legacy
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Technology Assessment Maturity Summary
(As Applicable)
TECHNICAL MATURITYProgram Planning / Execution
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Basis LegendTRL Legend
Does Not Meet TRL 8
Does Not Meet TRL 9
Previous CurrentE = Estimated | C = Calculated
T = Test Data | L = Legacy LV = Level B = Basis
Key
Critical Technology Elements
Previous Gate Current
TRL MRL IRL TRL MRL IRL
LV B LV B LV B LV B LV B LV B
Rotors 8 C 8 C 8 C 9 T 9 T 8 C
Propulsion 8 E 8 E 8 T 9 E 9 T 8 T
Actuators 8 C 7 C 8 C 9 C 9 T 8 T
UHF Antenna Assembly 7 T 8 T 8 E 8 T 8 E 8 E
Digital Receiver 8 C 8 C 7 C 8 T 8 T 8 T
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
TECHNICAL MATURITYProgram Planning / Execution
PCA and ISR Technical Assessment Summary
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
FY xx FY x1 FY x2 FY x3 FY x4 FY x5
Criti
cal R
eque
st fo
r Act
ion
ClosedTotal
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
FY xx FY x1 FY x2 FY x3 FY x4 FY x5No
n-Cr
itica
l Req
uest
for A
ctio
n
ClosedTotal
SETR Event SETR Date Close-Out Date
Critical Requests for Action Non-Critical Requests for Action
Total Open Closed Total Open Closed
PCAISR
Creation Date
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Sustainment Item Rating RationaleSustainment program logistically supports all system performance capabilities introduced to date, such that KPP/KSA capability parameters are assessed to meet threshold levels.
The Sustainment Program is executing per the LCSP/LRFS.
Sustainment related performance metrics are measured, assessed, reported, and used to revise Sustainment Program planning and execution.
Supply Chain Management to include a program of DMSMS is operating effectively to support operations and maintenance.
SUSTAINMENTProgram Planning / Execution
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Sustainment and Logistics Activities Page 1 of 2
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Sustainment Item Rating RationaleMaintenance is operating to specified levels of repair and is supporting operations.
The training system is operating to plan, is supporting the manpower KPP threshold (if applicable), and is supporting operations and maintenance.
Facilities are in place and environmentally ready to support scheduled systems fielding, deployment, operations, and maintenance.
SUSTAINMENTProgram Planning / Execution
Sustainment and Logistics Activities
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Page 2 of 2
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Independent Logistics Assessment Item Rating Rationale
ILS Management
Budgeting and Funding
Maintenance Planning/Execution
Design Interface
RAM Maturity Growth
Supply Support
Support and Common Equipment
Human Systems Integration (MPT&E)
Facilities & Platform Integration
Safety & Environment
Product/Technical Data
Computer Resources & SW Support
PHS&T
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Legend
Supports Activities Some Gaps Exist Significant Gaps
Exist
Independent Logistics Assessment
SUSTAINMENTProgram Planning / Execution
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
SOFTWARESoftware Sub-Metric Ratings
Program Planning / Execution
Sub-Metric Events Rating Rationale
Organization
Software sustainment capability (e.g. SSA), facilities, and infrastructure have been established and are supporting systems operations. Experienced software maintenance staff are in place and are being retained.
Quality
Software sustainment is being conducted, as detailed in the LCSP, and is being tracked, analyzed, and reported per established software metrics.
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Size / Stability Sub-Metric
Software Size / Stability Remarks / Notes
Program Planning / Execution
SOFTWARE
Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the
data table may allow.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Jan.
Feb.
Mar
.
Apr.
May
June Ju
l.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct
.
Nov
.
Dec
.
Date
Num
ber o
f Sof
twar
e U
nits
Planned Units
Actual Units
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Organization Sub-Metric
Software Organization
Program Planning / Execution
Remarks / Notes
SOFTWARE
Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the
data table may allow.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Post IB
R
Post C
DRCPD
Pre FRP
Sustai
nmen
t
Pers
onne
l
Total (P lanned)Total (Actual)Experienced (P lanned)Experienced (Actual)
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Cost/Schedule Sub-Metric
Software Cost/Schedule
Program Planning / Execution
Remarks / Notes
SOFTWARE
Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the
data table may allow.
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Percentage Complete (%)
Cum
ulat
ive
Valu
es ($
in M
illio
ns)
Actual Costs (AC)P lanned Value (P V)Earned Value (EV)Budget at Completion (BAC)
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Quality Sub-Metric
Software Quality
Program Planning / Execution
Remarks / Notes
SOFTWARE
Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the
data table may allow.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Jan.
Feb.
Mar
.
Apr.
May
Jun.
Jul.
Aug.
Sep.
Oct
.
Nov
.
Dec
.
Date
Num
ber o
f Tro
uble
Rep
orts
Total Trouble ReportsTrouble Reports OpenedTrouble Reports Closed
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
Contract Execution Breakdown
Contractor/Government Performer Rating Rationale
Contractor/Government Performer 1
Contractor/Government Performer 2
Program Planning / Execution
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Criteria: Contractor/government work performance is meeting program performance metrics and contractual delivery requirements in accordance with scheduled milestones.
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Contractor/Government Performer 1 Rating
Contractor/Government Performer 1
Program Planning / Execution
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
($400,000)
($300,000)
($200,000)
($100,000)
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
Jul-0
4
Aug-0
4
Sep-0
4
Oct-04
Nov-04
Dec-04
Jan-0
5
Thou
sand
s of
Dol
lars
Cost Variance $104,505 Sched Variance ($69,500) Mgmt Reserve $295,000
10% Thresholds PM VAC $318,321 CONTR VAC $0
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Program Planning / Execution
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
Contractor 1 Earned Value Metrics
CPI/SPI Legend
>= 0.95 >= 0.90 and < 0.95 < .90
TCPI Legend
| TCPI-CPI | <= 0.05
| TCPI-CPI |<= 0.10 and
> 0.05| TCPI-CPI |
> 0.10
CPI/SPI SummaryCPI SPI TCPI
Jul 2009 0.90 0.92 1.02
Jun 2009 0.93 0.94 1.02
May 2009 0.95 0.96 1.00
Apr 2009 0.97 0.97 1.00
Mar 2009 0.98 0.96 1.00
Feb 2009 1.21 0.96 1.00
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Program Planning / Execution
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
Estimates at Completion
$1,500,000
$1,600,000
$1,700,000
$1,800,000
$1,900,000
$2,000,000
1
$ IN
THO
USAN
DS
CUM CPI………………. $1,709,621
CPI*SPI…………………. $1,757,665
CBB…………………….. $1,798,668
LRE……….…………….. $1,798,668
PM EAC………………… $1,800,000
N00019-03-C-9999
Scheduled Completion Date: Dec 2007
Time Now
ABC CorpCORPORATION (IS)
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Non-EVMS Contract Status
Metric ValueSchedule Used / Allocated:
Budget Used / Allocated:
Behind Schedule (Y/N):
Overspending (Y/N):
Program Planning / Execution
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Contractor Performance Assessment Report
B Exceptional P Very Good G Satisfactory Y Marginal R Unsatisfactory
► No Change ▲ Improving ▼ Degrading
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Program Planning / Execution
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
B Outstanding P Excellent G Good Y Satisfactory R Unsatisfactory
CPAR Legend
Item: (CPAR or IPAR) IPAR IPAR IPAR CPAR IPAR IPAR IPAR IPAR IPARPeriod Ending: MM/YYYY Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08 Apr '08 Sep '08Months Covered: NR 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Areas to Evaluate a. Technical (Quality of Product) Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► 1. Product Performance G ► G ► B ▼ G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► 2. Systems Engineering G ► G ► G ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► B ▲ 3. Software Engineering G ► Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► P ▲ G ► G ► G ► 4. Logistics Support/Sustainment G ▼ G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► R ▲ G ► P ▲ 5. Product Assurance G ► B ► G ► G ► B ▲ Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► 6. Other Technical Performance G ► P ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ►b. Performance Y ▼ G ► R ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▲ 1. Schedule G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ▼ G ▲ G ► 2. Cost Control G ► G ► G ► B ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► G ►c. Management P ▲ G ► G ► G ► Y ▼ G ► G ► G ► G ► 1. Management Responsiveness G ► R ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► 2. Subcontract Management G ► G ► G ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ► P ▼ G ► 3. Program Mgmt. and Other Mgmt. R ▲ G ► G ▲ G ► P ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ►d. Other Areas G ► Y ▲ G ► G ► G ► G ▲ G ► G ► G ► 1. Communications G ► G ► G ► B ▼ G ► R ► G ► G ► G ► 2. Risk Management G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ► G ▼ G ► G ►
Contract Number: 123456789Estimated Completion Date: MM/DD/YYYYContract Start Date: MM/DD/YYYYContractor: Contractor Name 1
Program: Program Name
IPAR Legend
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
EVMS Contractor Staffing Plan / Execution
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Program Planning / Execution
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
-12,000.00
-10,000.00
-8,000.00
-6,000.00
-4,000.00
-2,000.00
0.00
2,000.00
4,000.00
6,000.00
8,000.00
May
-08
Jun-
08
Jul-0
8
Aug-
08
Sep-
08
Oct
-08
Nov
-08
Dec
-08
Jan-
09
Feb-
09
Mar
-09
Apr-
09
May
-09
Jun-
09
Jul-0
9
Aug-
09
Sep-
09
Oct
-09
Nov
-09
Previous Month's Plan Actual Last Month's 6 Month Projection
Current 6 Month Projection Delta to Last Month's Plan Cumulative Delta
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
EVMS Work Package Status
Program Planning / Execution
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
CONTRACT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
Task Execution Status
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Jan-07
Feb-07
Mar-07
Apr-07
May-07
Jun-07
Jul-07
Aug-07
Sep-07
Oct-07
Nov-07
Dec-07
Jan-08
Feb-08
Mar-08
Apr-08
Contract Period of Performance
Num
ber o
f Tas
ks
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% o
f Tot
al T
asks
in IM
S
Finish Early
Finish On Time
Finish Lessthan OneMonth LateFinish OverOne MonthLateIncomplete
Cum Planned% of Total
Cum Actual %of Total
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Government Performance Assessment
Event Rating RationaleProgram Office releases funding to contractor(s)/government performer(s) to maintain program schedules and to ensure effective and timely logistics and sustainment products and services.
RMB has been established. Risks are being mitigated per established timelines and are not being realized as issues.
Program Planning / Execution
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
GOVERNMENT PROGRAM OFFICE PERFORMANCE
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
Legend
Meets Criteria Partially Meets Criteria
Does Not Meet Criteria
Notes: Any pertinent information that cannot be readily gathered from the data table above can be included in this text box. It provides an easy method of conveying more details than the data table may allow.
Sub-metric Events Rating RationaleSupply Chain Risk Management (SCRM)
SCRM is active and continually assessing supply chain threats associated with design, procurement, and life cycle sustainment.
TECHNOLOGY PROTECTIONStatus of Technology Protection Sub-Metrics
Program Planning / Execution
PROGRAM NAME
GATE 6 Sustainment
(PoPS)
DATE
CLASSIFICATION (U)
External Influencers
INTERDEPENDENCIES
Solid denotes current systemDash denotes future system
Arrow to Program XYZ denotes supports Program XYZArrow from Program XYZ denotes Program XYZ supportsIndicates program are interdependent
No known issues affecting inter-related programs
Resolvable interface issues affecting programs
Unresolvable interface issues affecting programs
Program H
Program I (upgrades)
Program J
Program K
Program L
Program M
Program A
Program B
Program C
Program D
Program E
Program F
Program G
Program XYZ
Program XYZ
C S P
Programs, plus major public/private Sustainment infrastructure Interdependencies