Post on 10-May-2019
transcript
GREEN BUILDINGS for developing countries from code to voluntary systems
www.edgebuildings.com
IFC’s EDGE Offers a Programmatic Solution
3
Government regulations
Supporting new financial products
EDGE certification system
Investing in buildings &
technologies
A four-pronged approach to incentivize market adoption of green building practices
EDGE offers a dynamic effort to transform the market by drawing together government, developers, banks, professionals, and occupants.
Developers use EDGE to differentiate Banks target GB market with new products Owners recognize operating benefits Governments offer incentives and enable alignment of EE code
4
• Built environment: buildings structures
excluding infrastructure (roads, power plants, water sanitation, etc.)
• Risks: Natural hazards risks (seismic, weather-related, etc.) and chronic risks (fires, structural collapse)
• First line of protective defense against natural hazards: In cities, we spend 95% of our lives inside or around buildings
A new program for the built environment
Addis Ababa, 2016
Chronic
Building
Failure
Acute Disaster or
Concentrated Risk
The benefits of effective building regulation
PUBLIC
HEALTH
RESOURCE
EFFICIENCY
PROPERTY VALUE
& MUNICIPAL
FINANCE
ACCESSIBILITY
FOR PERSONS
WITH DISABILITIES
Chronic
Building
Failure
Acute Disaster or
Concentrated Risk
The benefits of effective building regulation
PUBLIC
HEALTH
RESOURCE
EFFICIENCY
PROPERTY VALUE
& MUNICIPAL
FINANCE
ACCESSIBILITY
FOR PERSONS
WITH DISABILITIES
8
ADDRESSING THE LARGE PERFORMANCE ‘GAP’ IN EMERGING MARKETS? _______
CODES: • SIMPLE • ACTIONABLE • BUSINESS-FOCUSED • INSPECTABLE
9
IFC’s GB Code Experience
1. Indonesia Green Building
Code National Jakarta Bandung* Makassar* Surabaya*
2. Vietnam Energy Efficiency
Code
5. Philippines
National Mandaluyong
4. Colombia
6. Peru* & Costa Rica*
3. Bangladesh*
Green Building
Code
* In development/ waiting
approval
About
10 Million m2 of new building
space has complied with
these codes
7. Mongolia, Cambodia & Myanmar In early planning stage
10
Phases in GB Code Development
2. Code Development
3. Code Enforcement
4. What Next?
1. Before the Code What kind of research & preparations is needed before starting code development?
How can the codes more impactful, simple and contextual?
How can high compliance be ensured, without burdening enforcement staff and developers?
How can we learn from the process and results to improve the current and future developments?
11
1. Before the Code 1.1. Criteria for Country Selection
Other Factors:
• High construction growth • Government interest and
policy alignment • Lack of existing regulation
Some countries with “low cost but high carbon grid” were still selected because energy is heavily subsidized there and the “real cost of energy” is fairly high
12
1. Before the Code 1.2. Long Term Roadmap
Current State Phased Plan Vision for Future
What initiatives/ enabling regulations/ related policies are already in place? What are the gaps between current state and desired vision? Who else is championing this in the country?
Based on government’s targets on - sustainability - energy/ resource sustainability - climate change
Timeline with specific intermediate targets. Also identifying teams/ champions
Net Zero Energy?
Net Carbon?
Renewable energy?
Reduced groundwater use?
CO2 emission targets?
Building Codes
Energy Conservation Laws
Appliance efficiency standards
13
1. Before the Code 1.2. Long Term Roadmap- example from Jakarta
CO2 Emissions
30% Water
30% Energy
30%
=
3.8
GWH
=
3.37
Mill. ton CO2e
=
2.400
Bill. liter
2030
Grand Design for entire Jakarta building stock
Reduction targets vs Business as Usual
14
Policy and Regulation
SKPD Penanggung Jawab Partner Potensial2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
1 Pengarusutamaan BGH pada RPJMD 2017, 2020, 2025 dan 2030 Bappeda
2 Pengembangan Pergub 38 dan Pembaharuannya DPK
3 Pengembangan Skema Pembiayaan BGH oleh Institusi Keuangan DPK
4 Pengembangan Skema Insentif dan Disinsentif DPK
6 Pengembangan Standar Kompetensi Pemeriksaan BGH Eksisitng DPK
Tahun Uraian KegiatanNo.
SKPD Penanggung Jawab Partner Potensial
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
1 Perangkat Penerapan untuk Implementasi Pemenuhan Persyaratan BGH BPTSP
2 Sinergi Prosedur Perizinan dan Kelaikan Fungsi BPTSP, DPK, BPLHD, DPE, Tata Air
3 Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi Pada Tahap Pemanfaatan BPTSP
4 Percontohan BGH DPGP
5 Pemantauan pada Percontohan BGH DPK, BPLHD, DPE, Tata Air
No. Uraian KegiatanTahun
Implementation
SKPD Penanggung Jawab Partner Potensial
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
1 Penilaian Berkala atas Implementasi BGH (Policy Assessment DPK
2 Pelaporan Pencapaian BPTSP
No. Uraian KegiatanTahun
Monitoring and Evaluation
Stakeholder Engagement
SKPD Penanggung Jawab Partner Potensial
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
1 Peningkatan Kualitas Aparat Pemda
a. Pelatihan Aparat terkait BGH dan Pemeriksaan Bangunan Badan Diklat
b. Lokakrya tentang BGH Badan Diklat
2 Peningkatan Kualitas Penyedia Jasa
a. Penyusunan Database IPTB Non RT secara elektronik DPK
b. Pelatihan dan Pelaksanaan Pembaharuan IPTB Non RT DPK
3 Keterlibatan Pemangku Kepentingan Lainnya dalam Pengemb. Kapasitas Biro KDH KLN, Biro Tapem
No. Uraian KegiatanTahun
Capacity Development
SKPD Penanggung Jawab Partner Potensial
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
1 Peningkatan Partispasi Publik
a. Kampanye Publik Diskominfomas
b. Pengarusutamaan pada Generasi Muda Dians Pendidikan
c. Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam Pengawasan DPK
2. Pengembangan Jejaring
a. Forum lintas pemangku kepentingan Biro KDH KLN
b. Keterkaitan dengan Akademisi dan Profesional Biro KDH KLN, Biro Tapem
c. Keterkaitan dengan Pemerintah Pusat (K/L) dan Pemerintah Daerah Biro Tapem
No. Uraian KegiatanTahun
Knowledge Management
SKPD Penanggung Jawab Partner Potensial
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
1 Penyebarluasan Informasi BGH
a. Website BGH Resmi DKI Jakarta Diskominfomas
b. Pusat informasi Penerapan Teknologi BGH DPK
2 Scaling UP
a. Kolaborasi lintas program (Kampung Ilim, Kawasan Hijau, Hunian Hijau, Kota Hijau) DPK, BPLHD
b. Partispasi Aktif pada acara-acara regional/internasional Biro KDH KLN
No. Uraian KegiatanTahun
JAKARTA GRAND DESIGN- PHASING TILL 2030
15
Phases in GB Code Development
2. Code Development 2.1. Stakeholder engagement
Identification of Gaps and
Challenges
Discussion of Best Practices from Other
countries
Share government ambitions and
targets
Awareness---- - What is the benefit of building green? - How to design GB efficiently? - Low consumer demand for GB Capacity---- - Lack of enforcement capacity in
government - Low skill level among professionals
(architects/ engineers, developers) Funding--- - Lack of funding mechanisms or
incentives - High cost of GB (real or perceived)
16
Phases in GB Code Development
2. Code Development 2.2. Type of Code
PRESCRIPTIVE PERFORMANCE CAP BASED
1. Based on specific building
elements
2. Defining the performance
of each element
3. Simpler to use
4. Less room to maneuver
1. Defining the performance of
entire building against
specific baseline.
2. Requires higher skills at
design and inspection stage
3. Higher flexibility
1. Defining the performance
of entire building against
specific use.
2. Requires higher skills at
design and inspection side
3. Higher flexibility
COMBINED
1. A combination of the
methods
Preferred approach for
developing countries
Preferred approach for
developing countries
17
Phases in GB Code Development
2. Code Development 2.3. Data Collection & Analysis
Building Survey Existing Local standards
Local Weather data
Calibrated computer simulation models
Typical Specifications
Operational behavior
Utility costs
Local utility tariffs
Local construction costs
Sensitivity analysis measures
19
Baseline
Max & Min Sensitivity Analysis
Energy saving more than 1% Exclude
Yes
Payback less than 5
Years?
No
Is it a easy
measure to
achieve?
Exclude No No
Yes
Technically feasible? Yes
No Exclude Yes
Include in the Code
Typical Criteria
for Selecting Code Measures
What is the cost impact? Payback assessment for offices
Green Building Measure %Saving
Cost
increase
Payback
period Action
• Window to wall ratio 8.0% Negative 0 Include
• Solar Shading Devices 17.3% 7.2% 25.0 Consider
• Reflectivity - Wall 0.5% 0.0% 4.8 Include
• Thermal Conductance (Wall U-Value) 0.3% 0.5% 98.6 Exclude
• Reflectivity – Roof 0.2% Negligible - Include
• Thermal Conductance – (Roof U-value) 0.1% 0.0% 18.1 Consider
• Glazing Assembly Properties (U-value, SHGC, VLT) 7.3% 0.1% 0.9 Include
• COP of air conditioning equipment 11.4% 1% 5.4 Include
• Variable Speed Drives for cooling towers 9% 0% 0 Include
• Heat recovery on extract air 2% Cost awaiting 26.2 Consider
• Solar collectors for Hot water NA NA --- Exclude
• Photo electric control perimeter lighting 18% 2% 7.4 Include
• Exterior lighting controls NA NA --- Exclude
• Low energy lighting [CFL, T5, LEDs etc] 7% 0.12% 1.0 Include
• Electronic Ballast 2% Negligible 0.0 Include
• Sub-metering benefits 3% NA NA Consider
• Water efficient fittings 40% 0.35% 6.0 Include
• Rainwater harvesting 15% Cost awaiting 26.2 Consider
• Recycling onsite Sewage T plant 67% Cost awaiting 7.4 Consider
• Water metering NA Negligible NA Include
• Storm water attenuation and ground water recharge NA Minimal impact NA Include
The energy saving potential of each measure has been correlated with the cost impact and therefor the simple payback.
High Impact Measures Office Retail Hotel Hospital Apartment School
Photoelectric controls [inclusion of controls to maximize
daylighting] 5% NA NA NA NA 6%
Solar Shading [addition of horizontal and vertical external
shading] 5% 5% 10% 9% 5% 2%
Glass performance [higher solar and thermal properties]
7% 3% 9% 8% 7% 4%
Efficient Chillers [higher chiller COP]
11% 8% 6% 7% 9% 12%
Variable speed drives [inclusion of variable drives on pumps]
9% 3% 3% 5% 0.0% 0.0%
Percentage glazing [limiting window to wall ratio of façade]
8% 4% 9% 7% 2% 0.0%
Low energy Lights [limiting the power density for lighting]
7% 8% 7% 16% 6% 5%
Thermostat Mgmt [limiting the min temperature]
2% 3% 3% 7% 6% 11%
Heat Recovery [adding heat recovery to fresh air inlet]
2% 5% 3% 8% NA NA
* Note: the above values must not be aggregated as they only reflect the potential of making each individual measure. The total energy savings potential will be smaller than the sum of individual measure
What measures make immediate sense in Jakarta? Sensitivity analysis of energy efficiency option for Jakarta shows that energy savings of more than 30-40% can be achieved from simple measures
Implementation Matrix Summary
OFFICES
CONST. COST
5% up ENERGY USE
25% down
RETAIL
CONST. COST
2% up ENERGY USE
15% down
HOTELS
CONST. COST
3% up ENERGY USE
30% down
HOSPITALS
CONST. COST
3% up ENERGY USE
30% down
APARTMENTS
CONST. COST
2% up ENERGY USE
15% down
SCHOOLS
CONST. COST
3% up ENERGY USE
15% down
With an overall cost increase of 3% energy saving of more than 20% can be achieved across all new buildings in Jakarta
23
Phases in GB Code Development
2. Code Development 2.4. Code Recommendations
Code Recommendations
Integration with permitting process
Legal process
• Very specific technical requirements
• Referring to existing standards, where appropriate
• Documentation requirements clearly mentioned
Legal language of the code may sometime need to be simplified in a
separate user guide
Complying of code is a prerequisite for getting construction/
occupancy permit
24
Phases in GB Code Development
3. Code Enforcement 3.1. Training
Over 2000 code officials already trained in last two years
What are green buildings? What are the technical code requirements? How to check the requirements?
25
Phases in GB Code Development
3. Code Enforcement 3.2. User Guides & Calculators
Technical details
Examples
Best practices
Documentation reqmts
Calculators to
simplify
compliance
calculations
26
Phases in GB Code Development
3. Code Enforcement 3.3. Pilot Projects
FPT Office in Da Nang La Thanh Hotel in Ha Noi Ehome in Ho Chi Minh city
• Special technical advice provided to pilot
project owners & design team
• Project documented for sharing
Citra Towers Kemayoran, Jakarta
27
Phases in GB Code Development
3. Code Enforcement 3.4. Evaluation and Compliance System
ANALOG SEMI-DIGITAL/ HYBRID
• Paper- based checklists
• Slow & tedious
• Difficult to record data
• Low tech and inexpensive
• Web compliance forms OR Downloadable Excel
based checklists
• Same checklists used by developers and evaluators
• Uploading of checklists with optional automatic
data extraction by IT system. Documents provided
• Checklists include calculators
• Documents maybe submitted digitally in CD/ USB
• Evaluation status updated manually online
CLOUD BASED
• Completely cloud based
system
• Upload of forms/ documents
• Additional guidance provided
online
• Evaluation status can be
checked online
Hindered by low internet speeds
Current approach for some countries Current approach for most countries
Preferred future approach
29
Jakarta GB Code Web Portal
Vietnam Code Web Portal
Colombia Web Portal
www.greenbuilding.jakarta.go.id
greenbuilding.distarcip.bandung.go.id
Bandung GB Website
31
Phases in GB Code Development
3. Code Enforcement 3.6. Raising Awareness
HCMC
Raising awareness through media, training workshops for professionals & academia
32
Phases in GB Code Development
4. What Next? 4.1. Monitoring
Jakarta GB Code requires regular utility data reporting Signed by Government of DKI Jakarta
Code Recommendation:
Water Consumption:
Design Feature 1
Design Feature 2
Design Feature 3
in recognition of their energy performance as shown below.
by DKI Government of Jakarta
For the year 2013-17
E N E R G Y P E R F O R M A N C E
IKE for this building 422 KWh/m2/year
J A K A R T A G R E E N B U I L D I N G
P E R F O R M A N C E A S S E S S M E N T
RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
This Performance Assessment Document is awarded to
[BUILDING TEST PROJECT123]
by [TEST OWNER ABC ]
Perlu melakukan retrofitting atau replacement
W A T E R P E R F O R M A N C E
1200 m3/person/year
D E S I G N F E A T U R E S
Band 1 (Hemat): IKE<294KWh/m2/yr
Band 2 (Agak Hemat):IKE 294 - 360
KWh/m2/yr
Band 3 (Agak Boros):IKE 360 - 409
KWh/m2/yr
Band 4 (Boros): IKE>409 KWh/m2/yr
Collected data
will be used to
develop
benchmarks
and flag
inefficient
buildings
33
Phases in GB Code Development
4. What Next? 4.1. Monitoring
Bandung GB Portal
also has a
monitoring
dashboard that
allows mayor to
keep track of all GB
applications
34
• Simple to comply and evaluate
• prescriptive OR hybrid code using compliance tool
• performance code to be phased in as the market matures
• Cost effective- low payback measures
• Localized
• based on local weather, available materials and technology, and construction practices
• developed through local stakeholder involvement (professionals, developers, owners etc.)
Supplemented by:
• Awareness building among industry including
training for government staff
• Financial instruments such as green mortgages,
DSM programs
• Supported by Financial and non-financial
Incentives
• Simplified compliance & monitoring mechanisms
IFC Approach for Developing Countries
36
EDGE IS MOVING GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION TO A MAINSTREAM PRODUCT
_______
EDGE: • SIMPLE • AFFORDABLE • BUSINESS-FOCUSED • FIT FOR FUNCTION
38
20%
THE SOLUTION IS EDGE: A SOFTWARE, A STANDARD, AND A GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION SYSTEM.
_______
ROOF TOP SOLAR PVs
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
WATER COOLED CHILLERS
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
DAYLIGHTING
CONTROLS
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
WALL INSULATION
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
EFFICENT GLASS
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
CEILING FANS
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
SOLAR HOT WATER
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
NATURAL VENTILATION
VENTILATION
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
EXTERNAL SHADING
COST SAVING
-$200K 9%
LOWER WINDOW AREA
EXPOSED SOFITS
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
CAVITY WALLS
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
SOLAR HOT WATER
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
NATURAL VENTILATI
VENTILATION
COST SAVING
$??? ???%
What if you could know what works best, instantly?
42
Operation Construction Design
Preliminary Certificate EDGE Certificate
Use of EDGE tools for design changes
Use of EDGE tools for construction changes
Register
EDGE website
BUILDINGS RECEIVE A PRELIMINARY CERTIFICATE AND A POST-CONSTRUCTION FINAL CERTIFICATE
_______
43
IN MOST COUNTRIES, PROJECTS CHOOSE BETWEEN 2 GLOBAL CERTIFYING PARTNERS
Global Office +44 203 473 8758 edge@thinkstep.com
Thinkstep-SGS Consortium Green Business Certification Inc
Global Office +1 202 828 1145 edge@gbci.org
OR A LOCAL PARTNER IN ONE OF THE COUNTRIES WITH LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS
_______
See https://www.edgebuildings.com/certify/ for details
45
• TOOL AVAILABLE IN 125 COUNTRIES
• ACTIVE PROGRAMS IN 5 COUNTRIES
• OVER 100 BUILDINGS CERTIFIED
• 822,000 M2 OF FLOOR SPACE
• 5,000 RESIDENTIAL UNITS
46
Confederation of Real Estate Developers Associations of India
JOIN ALL THOSE WHO ARE EMBRACING EDGE
IN EMERGING MARKETS
47
EDGE AS A CODE COMPLIANCE TOOL
EDGE can be used as a Hybrid
– performance based code
compliance tool
EDGE can also incorporate minimum prescriptive
requirements in its default list
If codes are fully enforced in a country, EDGE base case will
be same as a code compliance building
Minimum Code
48
HOW CAN EDGE HELP WITH NEW FINANCIAL PRODUCTS?
Reach out
to new
clients
Stronger
portfolio
Cross sell Sustainability
leadership
New offer
for current
clients GREEN BONDS
GREEN MORTGAGES
GREEN DEVELOPER FINANCE
QUESTIONS?
_______
Dr. Ommid Saberi
Senior Industry Specialist-Green Buildings IFC Climate Business Department
IFC is a member of the World Bank Group
T +1 (202) 458-5260
E osaberi@ifc.org